IRISH OBSTRUCTION IN ITS EARLY DAYS (1877).

=Source.=--_The Times_, August 1.

Mr. Parnell and his special friends greatly distinguished

themselves in the House of Commons last night by the multiplicity

of the motions in committee on the South Africa Bill. The

Government adopted special means to wear out the tenacity of the

members who thus consume hour after hour, for it had arranged that

the House should sit until the work should be done, even if the

discussion should last till breakfast time. But it does injustice

to Mr. Parnell. He is the most misunderstood and most ill-used man

in the House of Commons. Such is the burden of the long letter from

him which we printed on Monday. He has been accused of trying to

stop public business by floods of irrelevant speech. He has been

charged with something like open disrespect for the authority of

Mr. Speaker. He has been suspected of a wish to make Irish members

intolerable, in the hope that weary Englishmen and Scotchmen would

bid them begone to enjoy the beatitudes of Home Rule. He has made

the Leader of the House, although the mildest of men, propose to

banish him to the penal settlement of silence, and the House has

done him the honour of framing two new rules to impede the flow of

his speech during the rest of the Session.... The incorrectness

of that accusation, he replies, is proved by the comparatively

small use he has made of almost boundless opportunities. If his

enemies speak of what he has done, he appeals to what he might

have done. Has he obstructed every clause of every Bill? Has he

even obstructed every Bill? Has he exhausted all the forms of the

House even yet? These questions oppress us with a sense of his

moderation. If he has done so much, he might have done so much

more! As most Bills have at least ten clauses, as most clauses

contain at least a hundred words, and as at least one amendment

might be moved after each word, Mr. Parnell could have opposed

each Bill with at least a thousand amendments, and he himself, Mr.

Biggar, and Mr. O'Donnell could each have delivered at least a

thousand speeches.

Imperialism and Mr. Gladstone (1876-1887) · 第 22 / 117 题