RUSSIA DECLARES WAR ON TURKEY (1877).

=Source.=--_The Times_, April 25.

We have not a word to say in defence of the Porte. We admit that it

was guilty, as Lord Salisbury has confessed, of infatuation when

it defied the Conference, and that it would have accepted even the

Protocol, if it had possessed a tithe of the sagacity which was

once a better protection of its weakness than ironclads are to-day.

We may even admit that the Protocol was, what Prince Gortchakoff

styles it, the last expression of the united will of Europe. But

his story is fatally incomplete. It would have been desirable to

know whether Russia has done her best to make it easy for Turkey

to accept the undisguised tutelage of the European Powers. That

question calls to mind how much the fanaticism of the Turks was

inflamed by the covert aid which Russia gave to Servia. The Czar

refers to the famous words which he spoke in the Kremlin. They were

indeed the real declaration of war, for they prevented Russia from

accepting anything less than the complete submission of Turkey.

Russia might plead, no doubt, that as war was certain to be found

an absolute necessity in the end, it mattered little how rudely

she ruffled the Osmanli pride. But in that case the negotiations

of the past two years have been a series of hypocrisies. As it

is, the general judgment is expressed by what Lord Derby said

last night. While he found it hopeless to bend the will of Turkey

towards submission, he equally found on the part of her Government

"a deeply seated conviction that, do what they would, sooner or

later war would be forced upon them." He believed that he and

his colleagues have throughout been "engaged in the solution of

a hopeless problem." Such, we fear, is the prosaic truth, and,

whatever be the measure of Turkish obstinacy, Russia cannot escape

condemnation. She has sometimes acted as if she wished to cut off

a way of retreat both from herself and her foe.... Russia has

hastened to stop all further negotiations, and to act as if she

and she alone had an interest in the tranquillity of the Turkish

Empire. Thus she has forfeited any right to speak in the name

of Europe. Nor has she given the Powers assurances which they

had a right to expect. Nothing is said in the same strain as the

declarations at Livadia, that Russia had no objects of territorial

ambition.... The Czar has committed a grave error by neglecting to

proclaim that in no event would he seize Turkish territory.

Imperialism and Mr. Gladstone (1876-1887) · 第 21 / 117 题