The evidences of _Hercules_ planting _Britain_, are of the like nature,

which I shall very briefly recapitulate. _Apollodorus_ in II. after

the story of _Hercules_, _Antæus_ and _Geryon_, two kings in _Afric_

and _Spain_, mentions his conquering _Alebion_ and _Dercynus_ sons of

_Neptune_, in the same mythologic strain as the others, because they

attempted to drive away his oxen. He makes it to be in _Libya_, others

in _Ligya_ or _Liguria_, others in _Gaul_. The variety of places is of

no consequence in these very old stories. I regard only the personal

names of _Albion_ and _Bergion_, as more commonly call’d, sons of

_Neptune_. If this be really so, sons of _Tarshish_, son of _Javan_:

for _Tarshish_ was the true _Neptune_ of the heathen; and he was one

of the sons to whom the heathen generally attribute the plantation of

islands, as well as _Moses_, _Gen._ x. 5. But _Albion_ and _Bergion_

are notoriously most ancient names of _Britain_ and _Ireland_. _Mela_,

II. 5. mentions _Hercules_ fighting _Albion_ and _Bergion_. So _Tzetzes

in chiliad._ and _Tzetzes_ the interpreter of _Lycophron_.

_Tacitus_ says expressly _Hercules_ was in _Germany_, in that part

lying upon the ocean especially. _Ammianus Marcellinus_, in his XV. 9.

tells us from _Timagenes_, an ancient historian, “that the _Dorienses_

following the more ancient _Hercules_, inhabited the western countries

bordering on the ocean.” By mount _Carmel_ was a city _Dora_ spoken of

by _Josephus_, and by _Stephanus_ of _Byzantium_, quoting _Hecatæus_,

and many more old authors. See the famous fragment of _Stephanus_.

_Claudius Julius_, in his III. of the _Phœnician_ history, writes,

“next to _Cæsarea_ is _Dora_, inhabited by _Phœnicians_ on account of

the great quantity of the purple fish there found.” Now _Hercules_

being confessedly the inventor of this _Tyrian_ dye, ’tis probable the

companions of his, mention’d by _Ammianus_, were of this city.

If _Hercules_ peopled the ocean, coasts of _Gaul_, _Spain_ and

_Germany_, we may well imagine he would do the like in _Britain_.

_Pliny_’s testimony is express, that _Melcarthus_ (corruptly

_Midacritus_) first brought _tyn_ from the _Cassiterid_ islands, which

can be no other than _Britain_.

The poets and mythologists, when speaking of the _Titans_, agree they

went all into the west, which seems to be meant of _Hercules_ and his

people settling in _Britain_. Our _Thule_, or northern island, seems

to have been named by our _Hercules_, as a demonstration of his being

there, from an island of the same name in the _Persian_ gulph. Of which

_Bochart_.

The like is to be inferr’d from such stories as that related by

_Parthenius Nicæus_, “that _Hercules_ travelling, after his expedition

against _Geryon_, pass’d thro’ the country of the _Celts_, and was

entertain’d by _Britannus_. His daughter _Celtine_ fell in love with

him, on whom he begat a son call’d _Celtus_; from him afterwards the

people of the _Celts_ received their denomination.”

We took notice before, that these shepherds who quitted _Egypt_ under

the conduct of our _Hercules_, call’d themselves _Hycsi_, as _Manethon_

informs us in _Josephus & Eusebius in chronol._ The word imports

_royal shepherds_, _valiant_, _freemen_, _heroes_. Now we find the

remains of this very name in the south-western part of our island, in

_Worcestershire_, even to the _Roman_ times, and still further, even

to the time of venerable _Bede_. They were called _Huiccii_, to which

_Orduices_ and _Vigornienses_ is synonymous. And all three words mean

the same thing, as the great _Baxter_ shews in his glossary, _Antiq.

Britan. voce Orduices_, _Iceni_, _Huiccii_, &c. And by all accounts

our old _Britons_ lov’d that same free, shepherd’s life, which the old

_Canaanites_ did about _Abraham_’s time, as describ’d in scripture.

Bishop _Cumberland_ is elaborate upon it.

I take the _Irish_, and ancient highland _Scots_, to be the remains

of the original _Phœnician_ colony. My learned friend, Dr. _Pocock_,

when he was in _Ireland_, observ’d a surprizing conformity between the

present _Irish_ and the _Egyptians_, and that in very many instances.

These considerations, added to what I said in _Stonehenge_, are enough

to persuade us, that our _Hercules_ had a considerable hand in peopling

_Britain_.

[Illustration:

TAB. XL.

_The antient Symbols of the deity._

the deity thus exprest on the imposts at Persepolis.

_thus upon Chinese gates._

_thus in Egyptian monuments._

_on asardonyx in Pignor. mens. Isiaca. P.20._

_isiac table._

_isiac table._

_isiac table._

_isiac table._

_isiac table._

_Reverendissimo Prœsuli Iohanni Archiepiscopo Cantuarensi.

humillime d.d. W. Stukeley._]

CHAP. XIV.

_Part of_ Cadmus _his history, who was a builder of serpentine

temples. He was son of_ Canaan _called_ Agenor. _He was a_ Horite

_or_ Hivite, _call’d_ Kadmonite _in scripture._ Hivite _signifies

a serpent. Mount_ Hermon _denominated from his wife_, Psal.

cxxxiii. 3. _“like as the dew of_ Hermon, _which fell on the hill

of_ Sion.” _Correct it_, Sirijon. _Another correction in the

translation of our bible_, “Canaanite _in the house of the Lord

of hosts,” read_ merchant. _’Tis a prophecy not attended to_,

Zech. xiv. 21. _The ancient_ greek _fables of sowing serpents’

teeth; of_ Cadmus _and his wife being turn’d into serpents, and

the like; are form’d from their building serpentine temples. Not

to be wonder’d at so much, when our country-people have the very

same reports of_ Rouldrich _stones; of the_ Weddings, _another

Druid temple in_ Somersetshire; _of_ Long Meg and her daughters,

_another in_ Cumberland; _and most firmly believe, that they were

men and women turn’d into stones. The mythology of the ancients

not to be despis’d, but its original meaning sought for._

None more famous in _Grecian_ history than _Cadmus_, who brought

them the use of those letters that convey’d their history to us,

and preserv’d the little knowledge we can chiefly have of profane

antiquity. He was son of _Agenor_, by which word the _Greeks_ chose

to pronounce the difficult one of _Canaan_. _Alexander Polyhistor_

cites out of _Eupolemus_; “from _Saturn_ (who is _Cham_) came _Belus_

and _Canaan_, and _Canaan_ begat the father of the _Phœnicians_, or

_Phœnix_. _Eusebius, pr. ev._ 9 has it too. Again, _Eusebius, pr. ev._

1. quotes from _Sanchoniathon_, _Cna_, (_Canaan_,) who was styled

among the _Phœnicians_ ΧΗΝΑ.” So in _Stephanas_ of _Byzantium_,

_Phœnicia_ is called ΧΗΝΑ, and the _Phœnicians_ ΧΗΝΑΙ, which is

_Canaanites_. ΧΗΝΑ, _Cna_, is _Agenor_.

_Cadmus_ lived in the time of, or very little after _Hercules_.

Tho’ the _Parian_ marble is an invaluable monument, yet ’tis not

an infallible one. If the learned _Bentley_ finds it erring about

_Stesichorus_, we must not depend on its _æra_ of _Cadmus_, who lived

a thousand years before that stone was made. Nor is the authority of

_Eusebius_’s chronology in this particular, greater. _Bochart_ holds

him older than the builder of _Tyre_; _there_ perhaps he heightens his

date a little too much.

To have a proper notion of the history of this great man, bishop

_Cumberland_ shews us, that the _Horites_ or _Hivites_, sons of

_Canaan_, i. e. the colony or people of _Cadmus_ son of _Agenor_, or

_Canaan_, went out of the land of _Canaan_ about the same time that

_Misraim_ or _Osiris_, son of _Cham_, went to plant _Egypt_. They went

likewise into _Egypt_. They lived quietly there for some time, but

war arising between the _Misraimites_ and the pastors, they retir’d

back again, probably a little before the expulsion of the pastors. Some

went to the north of _Canaan_, about mount _Hermon_ under _Libanus_;

some remain’d in the more southern parts, more particularly call’d

_Horites_, or _Avim_, or _Hivites_.

In _Gen._ xv. 18. when God made his great covenant with _Abraham_,

he tells him, he will give him the land of the _Kenites_, and

_Kenizzites_, and _Kadmonites_, and _Hittites_, and _Perizzites_, and

_Rephaims_, _Amorites_, &c. By _Kadmonites_ he means the people of

_Cadmus_ son of _Canaan_. But afterward, in all those places where

these nations are recited, they are called _Hivites_; _Cadmus_ was

likewise call’d _Hyas_, _Hivæus_: _Hyas_ or _Cadmus_, one or both,

being honorary names, or names of consecration, as was the mode of that

time. The same is to be said of _Melchizedec_, _Abimelech_, _Pharaoh_,

and many more. About this time there was likewise _Hyas_ a son of

_Atlas_.

The name of _Hermon_ is probably deriv’d from his wife _Hermione_, as

a compliment to her. And of this mountain is that saying in _Psalm_

cxxxiii. 3. The psalmist draws an elegant comparison of the holy

unction of _Aaron_ running from his head to his beard, and so down

his garments, “like as the dew of _Hermon_ which falls on the hill of

_Sion_.” A difficulty that gave St. _Augustin_ a great deal of trouble;

but must needs be an absurd reading, and ought to be corrected _Sirion_

for _Sion_. _Sirion_ is a lower part of the high ground at the bottom

of mount _Hermon_, as that lies under the elated crest of _Libanus_.

_Psal._ xxix. 6. “_Libanon_ also, and _Sirion_, like a young unicorn.”

A mountain not a little remarkable, since we read, _Deut._ iii. 9.

“which _Hermon_ the _Sidonians_ call _Sirion_, and the _Amorites_ call

it _Shenir_;” _Hermon_ and _Sirion_ being parts of mount _Libanon_.

Since we are upon criticism, the reader will excuse me in mentioning

another of like nature, and not foreign to our purpose. These

_Horites_, _Hivites_, _Avim_ or _Cadmonites_, as called from _Cadmus_,

_Gen._ xv. 19. or _Canaanites_, as called from his father _Canaan_,

extending themselves upon the _Phœnician_ shore, became traders or

merchants in the most eminent degree of all ancient people in the

world, and traded as far as _Britain_; so that the name of _Canaanite_

and _merchant_ became equivalent. _Isaiah_ xxiii. 8. “Who hath taken

this counsel against _Tyre_, saith the prophet, the _crowning_ city;

whose merchants are princes, whose _traffickers_ are the honourable of

the earth.”

Hence we observe, 1. The prophet calls it the _crowning_ city, for they

sent a golden crown to _Alexander the great_ as a present.

2. The word _traffickers_, _mercatores_, is _Canaanites_ in the

original. And the like in _Jerem._ x. 17. “Gather up thy _wares_ out of

the land, O inhabiter of the fortress.” ’Tis _Canahe_ in the original.

3. This naturally leads me to mention a noble prophecy, overlook’d

thro’ a too literal translation in our bible, _Zech._ xiv. 21. “Yea,

every pot in _Jerusalem_, and in _Judah_, shall be holiness unto

the LORD of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take

of them, and seethe therein. And in that day there shall be no more

the _Canaanite_ in the house of the LORD of hosts.” It ought to be

translated _merchant_, as in the vulgate _latin_ and _chaldee_. For

’tis a prophecy concerning the days of the Messiah; and regards that

famous act of his life, when he drove the traders out of the temple.

The _Kadmonites_ got the name of _Hivites_, as I apprehend, from their

celebrity in building temples of the serpentine form. At first they

were consecrated to true religion; but too soon all these, and other

patriarchal temples in the land of _Canaan_ were polluted to idolatrous

purposes; and probably from them the worship of snakes became famous.

Now the word _Avim_, _Hevæus_ in the _Syriac_, signifies a _snake_.

And from this custom of the _Phœnicians_ making serpentine temples,

the notion might arise of the _Phœnicians_ worshipping serpents, as

_Eusebius_ observes, _pr. ev._ I. And from this the _Greeks_ made their

fables of _Cadmus_ overcoming a great snake, sowing its teeth, and

armed men sprouting up, _&c._

On this account it is, that they who represent this exploit of his,

describe it as done by a stone of a very extraordinary bulk, _Ovid.

Met._ III. _v._ 59.

————_dextrâque molarem

Sustulit, et magnum magno conamine misit.

Illius impulsu cùm turribus ardua celsis

Mœnia mota forent; serpens sine vulnere mansit._

The bulk of the serpent is equally extravagant,

————_immensos sinuatur in arcus.

————tantoque est corpore, quanto

Si totum species, geminos qui separat arctos.

Ipse modò immensum spiris facientibus orbem

Cingitur, interdum longâ trabe rectior exit._

This is but a poetical description of the circle and the avenues at

_Abury_.

You have this same action of the heroes represented in some _Tyrian_

coins: _Cadmus_ is throwing a stone at a serpent. That of _Gordian_

III. in _Vaillant_’s colony coins, vol. II. p. 217. Another of

_Gallienus_, p. 350. The author quotes _Nonnus_’s _Dionysiacs_ IV.

reciting the history of his breaking a snake’s head with a stone. And

he thinks those other _Tyrian_ coins belong to this same history, as

that p. 136, where a snake is represented as roll’d about a great stone.

[Illustration:

I. _A coin of_ Gordian III. Vaillant’s colon. II. p. 217. _which

the learned author adjudges to_ Cadmus. _Another of_ Gallienus,

p. 350. _Both struck at_ Tyre.

II. _A coin of the city of_ Tyre _in_ Vaillant’s colon. p. 136,

147. _The learned author says a stone and serpent is the symbol

of_ Cadmus. _The truth is, they regard_ Cadmus _founding

serpentine temples._]

It was from the city of _Sareptha_ that _Europa_ was carry’d off; ’tis

in the country of _Sidon_; and I apprehend, from the name of it, here

was originally a serpentine temple. _Sareptha_ is the serpent _Ptha_. I

have an ancient coin of this city, in brass. A palm-tree on one side, a

leopard’s face on the other, which refers to the wine here famous: of

which the learned _Reland_ in _Palestina_.

_Conon_, in his narration 37, gives us the origin of the _greek_ fable

of _Cadmus_’s men, the _Phœnicians_, springing out of the ground armed,

for before then helmets and shields were unknown. Hence they were

call’d _Spartæ_.

That these armed men sprung out of the ground upon sowing the serpent’s

teeth, means our _Hivites_ making a religious procession along the

avenue of their serpentine temples on the great festival days, when

they sacrific’d. We see a like procession of armed men, carv’d upon

the temple of _Persepolis_ in _Le Brun_’s prints. And Ovid calles a

_Bœotian_, one of _Cadmus_’s people, _Hyantius_, III. v. 147. _Strabo_

vii. writes, they took that name from their king _Hyas_, which is the

same as _Hivite_. _Pliny_ iv. 7. observes the _Bœotians_ were so call’d

anciently.

In the next book _Met._ iv. ver. 560. we have an account of _Melicerta_

our _Melcarthus_ and his mother deify’d: and of the _Sidonian_ women

their companions, some turn’d into stones, others into birds, for

grieving at their fate. This seems to mean their building temples after

some of the modes we have been describing, and that which is to follow

chap. XVI. near the sepulchres of heroes and founders of states; as was

the custom of old: what we observed by _Silbury-hill_ and _Abury_. For

these temples were prophylactick, and a sacred protection to the ashes

of the defunct. So we read in _Virgil_ by _Anchises_’s tomb, _Æneid_ V.

_Tunc vicina astris Erycino in vertice sedes

Fundatur Veneri Idaliæ; tumuloque sacerdos

Ac lucus latè sacer additur Anchisæo._

Immediately after _Ovid_’s account of _Melicerta_, the poet speaks of

_Cadmus_ and his wife turn’d into serpents: which I understand of the

like serpentine temple made by their sepulchre. _Suidas_ writes, on

_Epaminondas_’s tomb was a shield and a snake carv’d, to shew he was

of _Spartan_ race. We may very well imagine the circle and snake, the

cognizance of _Cadmus_.

After _Cadmus_’s decease, his people built a city called _Butua_; and

near it is a place call’d _Cylices_, where _Cadmus_ and _Hermione_ were

turn’d into serpents: and two stone snakes are there set up by the

_Phœnicians_, to their honour: _Bochart_ page 502, where many authors

are quoted to prove these particulars. He says, the word _Cylices_

in _Phœnician_, means _tumulos_, our barrows. It was a place full

of sepulchral _tumuli_, as _Stonehenge_ and _Abury_: cups revers’d,

regarding the form of them. _Nonnus in Dionys._ writes, that there

are two great stones or rocks there, which clap together with a great

noise, whence auguries are taken. _Tzetzes chiliad._ iv. _hist._ 139,

mentions the same thing. I take this to be a main ambre, of which I

spoke largely in _Stonehenge_. _Herodot._ V. 61. says the _Cadmeians_

being admitted citizens of _Athens_, built temples there, which had

nothing common with the _Greek_ temples; particularly they had a temple

of _Ceres Achæa_ and mystical rites. _Achæa_, I suppose, means a

serpentine temple, from the oriental name.

We read just now, that the _Sidonian_ women, the mourners for

_Melcarthus_ and his mother, were turn’d some into stones, others into

birds.

_Pars volucres factæ, sumptis Ismenides alis._

I should suppose the internal meaning of this to be, the

making an alate temple, of which we are further to speak in chap. xvi.

_Antoninus Liberalis_ in his XXXI. tells a very old story of the first

inhabitants of _Italy_ before _Hercules_’s time; a place among the

_Messapians_ called the sacred stones: where the nymphs _Epimelides_

had a fane set round with trees, which trees were formerly men. This

must be understood as the former.

Thus we see how the ancient _Greeks_ involv’d every thing in fable,

but still all fable has some historical foundation, and _that_ we must

endeavour to find, by applying things so properly together, as to

strike out the latent truth.

The learned Dr. _Bogan_ in his letter prefix’d to _Delphi phœniciss._

from _Æschylus_ and others, Ικετ. ά. shews, that men were often call’d

snakes by the ancients, in an allegorical way; and as to the report of

_Cadmus_ and his wife, of the _Sidonian_ women and others, turn’d into

snakes, or stones, or birds, or trees, in the sense we are explaining

them; ’tis no more than what we daily see and hear at this time, in

these very Druid temples of our own island, which we are speaking of.

The people who live at _Chippin-Norton_ and all the country round our

first described temple of _Rowldrich_; affirm most constantly and as

surely believe it, that the stones composing this work are a king, his

nobles and commons turn’d into stones. They quote an ancient proverb

for it, concerning that tall stone, call’d the king stone.

_If_ Long-Compton _thou canst see,

Then king of_ England _shall thou be._

And as Mr. _Roger Gale_ wrote once to me from the place: “’tis the

creed of all that country, and whoever dares to contradict it, is

looked upon as the most audacious free-thinker.”

The very same report remains, at the Druid temple of _Stanton-Drew_, in

_Somersetshire_, which I shall describe in my next volume. This noble

monument is vulgarly call’d the _Weddings_; and they say,’tis a company

who assisted at a nuptial solemnity, thus petrify’d. In an orchard near

the church, is a cove consisting of three stones, like that of the

northern circle in _Abury_, or that of _Longstones_: this they call the

parson, the bride, and bridegroom. Other circles are said to be the

company dancing: and a separate parcel of stones standing a little from

the rest, are call’d the fidlers, or the band of musick.

So that vast circle of stones in _Cumberland_ which was a Druid temple,

is call’d _long Meg and her daughters_, and verily believed to have

been human, turn’d into stones.

Thus we see an exact uniformity between the fables of the antient

_Greeks_, and our present people. The former found these kind of

patriarchal temples built by their first heroes and planters; admiring

the vastness of the works, they affix’d these marvellous stories to

them, and retain them as firmly, as our vulgar do the like now. And

this is the nature of the ancient mythology; but by finding the end of

the clue, we draw it out into useful truths.

These _Cadmonites_, _Avim_, _Hittites_, _Hivites_, _Spartans_,

_Lacedemonians_, (who are all one and the same people,) retain’d a

distinct remembrance of their relation to the _Jews_, even to the days

of the _Maccabees_, as we read 1. _Maccab._ xii. and in _Josephus_ Ant.

xii. 5. Undoubtedly they reckoned themselves of kin to _Abraham_, if

not descended from him; thus I understand it. _Joshua_ mentions chap.

xi. the _Hivites_ in the land of _Mizpeh_ under mount _Hermon_ by

_Libanus_. He says further, in the 19th verse, the _Gibeonites_ were

a portion of that same people. The _Avim_ or _Horites_ about mount

_Seir_ where _Esau_ dwelt, were the same people who were expell’d by

the _Caphthorim_, as _Moses_ mentions: on which bishop _Cumberland_ has

wrote largely.

We read of the great intercourse there was between _Esau_’s family and

these people; for _Esau_ married four of his wives from them, _Gen._

xxvi. 34. xxxvi. 2. no doubt but they married into his family again.

Hence it is that _Strabo_ x. writes, that _Cadmus_ had _Arabians_ in

his company. And in xvi. that the inhabitants of _Syria_ (he means

properly _Phœnicia_) are originally deriv’d from the neighbourhood of

the _Persian gulf_.

I doubt not but that there are now upon the face of the earth, many of

these serpentine temples remaining in _Europe_, _Asia_ and _Africa_.

For instance, _Strabo_ xvi. from _Posidonius_ relates, that in a field

call’d _Macra_ by _Damascus_, was a dead serpent, the length of an

acre, so thick that two horsemen could not see each other across him,

his mouth so large as a horseman might enter into it; each scale was as

big as a shield.

We may hence see the origin of idolatry, soon after these heroes we

have recited; and it seems to have begun first in _Phœnicia_, which

_Eusebius_ always puts before _Egypt_, when speaking of the matter.

_Demaroon_ was _Jupiter_ the supreme, _Phut_ they deify’d into his

son, _Canaan_ they made the third divine person. But wherever idolatry

began, whether in the call of _Asia_, or the west, it flew too soon

into other countries, and they made a _Jupiter_, a _Son_, and a

_Mercury_ or _Neptune_ who are the same, of their own; ’till with every

hero and benefactor to mankind they fill’d the heaven of the heathens.

CHAP. XV.

_A metaphysical disquisition concerning the nature of the deity,

shewing how the Druids, by the strength of reason, might arrive

to the knowledge of a divine emanation or person, from the

supreme first cause, which we call the Son of God; and the

necessity of admitting of such an emanation. All the philosophers

and priests of antiquity had this notion; as we read in_ Plato

_and many more._

I have given the reader an account of three eminent builders of these

_Dracontia_, or serpentine temples, in the earliest times after the

flood, and in the more eastern parts of the world; as well as described

one of those works in our island. There are many more such builders

and buildings, which will be easily found out by those that are

conversant in ancient learning. This figure of the circle and snake,

on which they are founded, had obtained a very venerable regard,

in being expressive of the most eminent and illustrious act of the

deity, the multiplication of his own nature, as the _Zoroastrians_ and

_Platonists_ speak; and in being a symbol of that divine person who was

the consequence of it.

We shall not wonder that the Druids had a perception of this great

truth, when we consider that it was known, as far as necessary, to all

the philosophic and religious sects of antiquity, as shewn at large by

several learned writers. My opinion is, that it was communicated to

mankind, originally, by God himself. ’Tis the highest point of wisdom

which the human mind can arrive at, to understand somewhat of the

nature of the deity; and the studious, the pious, and thinking part of

the world, would not fail to improve this knowledge by reflexion and

ratiocination.

Abury, A Temple of the British Druids, With Some Others, Described · 第 11 / 14 段