CHAPTER XIX.

ASSYRIA'S AGE OF SPLENDOUR

Tiglath-pileser IV, the Biblical Pul--Babylonian Campaign--Urartian

Ambitions in North Syria--Battle of Two Kings and Flight of

Sharduris--Conquest of Syro-Cappadocian States--Hebrew History from

Jehu to Menahem--Israel subject to Assyria--Urartu's Power

broken--Ahaz's Appeal to Assyria--Damascus and Israel

subdued--Babylonia united to Assyria--Shalmaneser and Hoshea--Sargon

deports the "Lost Ten Tribes"--Merodach Baladan King of

Babylonia--Egyptian Army of Allies routed--Ahaz and Isaiah--Frontier

Campaigns--Merodach Baladan overthrown--Sennacherib and the Hittite

States--Merodach Baladan's second and brief Reign--Hezekiah and

Sennacherib--Destruction of Assyrian Army--Sack of Babylon--

Esarhaddon--A Second Semiramis--Raids of Elamites, Cimmerians,

Scythians, and Medes--Sack of Sidon--Manasseh and Isaiah's

Fate--Esarhaddon conquers Lower Egypt--Revolt of Assyrian

Nobles--Ashurbanipal.

We now enter upon the last and most brilliant phase of Assyrian

civilization--the period of the Third or New Empire during which

flourished Tiglath-pileser IV, the mighty conqueror; the Shalmaneser

of the Bible; "Sargon the Later", who transported the "lost ten

tribes" of Israel; Sennacherib, the destroyer of Babylon, and

Esarhaddon, who made Lower Egypt an Assyrian province. We also meet

with notable figures of Biblical fame, including Ahaz, Hezekiah,

Isaiah, and the idolatrous Manasseh.

Tiglath-pileser IV, who deposed Ashur-nirari IV, was known to the

Babylonians as Pulu, which, some think, was a term of contempt

signifying "wild animal". In the Bible he is referred to as Pul,

Tiglath-pilneser, and Tiglath-pileser.[503] He came to the Assyrian

throne towards the end of April in 745 B.C. and reigned until 727 B.C.

We know nothing regarding his origin, but it seems clear that he was

not of royal descent. He appears to have been a popular leader of the

revolt against Ashur-nirari, who, like certain of his predecessors,

had pronounced pro-Babylonian tendencies. It is significant to note in

this connection that the new king was an unswerving adherent of the

cult of Ashur, by the adherents of which he was probably strongly

supported.

Tiglath-pileser combined in equal measure those qualities of

generalship and statesmanship which were necessary for the

reorganization of the Assyrian state and the revival of its military

prestige. At the beginning of his reign there was much social

discontent and suffering. The national exchequer had been exhausted by

the loss of tribute from revolting provinces, trade was paralysed, and

the industries were in a languishing condition. Plundering bands of

Aramaeans were menacing the western frontiers and had overrun part of

northern Babylonia. New political confederacies in Syria kept the

north-west regions in a constant state of unrest, and the now powerful

Urartian kingdom was threatening the Syro-Cappadocian states as if its

rulers had dreams of building up a great world empire on the ruins of

that of Assyria.

Tiglath-pileser first paid attention to Babylonia, and extinguished

the resistance of the Aramaeans in Akkad. He appears to have been

welcomed by Nabonassar, who became his vassal, and he offered

sacrifices in the cities of Babylon, Sippar, Cuthah, and Nippur.

Sippar had been occupied by Aramaeans, as on a previous occasion when

they destroyed the temple of the sun god Shamash which was restored by

Nabu-aplu-iddina of Babylon.

Tiglath-pileser did not overrun Chaldaea, but he destroyed its

capital, Sarrabanu, and impaled King Nabu-ushabshi. He proclaimed

himself "King of Sumer and Akkad" and "King of the Four Quarters". The

frontier states of Elam and Media were visited and subdued.

Having disposed of the Aramaeans and other raiders, the Assyrian

monarch had next to deal with his most powerful rival, Urartu.

Argistis I had been succeeded by Sharduris III, who had formed an

alliance with the north Mesopotamian king, Mati-ilu of Agusi, on whom

Ashur-nirari had reposed his faith. Ere long Sharduris pressed

southward from Malatia and compelled the north Syrian Hittite states,

including Carchemish, to acknowledge his suzerainty. A struggle then

ensued between Urartu and Assyria for the possession of the

Syro-Cappadocian states.

At this time the reputation of Tiglath-pileser hung in the balance. If

he failed in his attack on Urartu, his prestige would vanish at home

and abroad and Sharduris might, after establishing himself in northern

Syria, invade Assyria and compel its allegiance.

Two courses lay before Tiglath-pileser. He could either cross the

mountains and invade Urartu, or strike at his rival in north Syria,

where the influence of Assyria had been completely extinguished. The

latter appeared to him to be the most feasible and judicious

procedure, for if he succeeded in expelling the invaders he would at

the same time compel the allegiance of the rebellious Hittite states.

In the spring of 743 B.C. Tiglath-pileser led his army across the

Euphrates and reached Arpad without meeting with any resistance. The

city appears to have opened its gates to him although it was in the

kingdom of Mati-ilu, who acknowledged Urartian sway. Its foreign

garrison was slaughtered. Well might Sharduris exclaim, in the words

of the prophet, "Where is the king of Arpad? where are the gods of

Arpad?"[504]

Leaving Arpad, Tiglath-pileser advanced to meet Sharduris, who was

apparently hastening southward to attack the Assyrians in the rear.

Tiglath-pileser, however, crossed the Euphrates and, moving northward,

delivered an unexpected attack on the Urartian army in Qummukh. A

fierce battle ensued, and one of its dramatic incidents was a single

combat between the rival kings. The tide of battle flowed in Assyria's

favour, and when evening was falling the chariots and cavalry of

Urartu were thrown into confusion. An attempt was made to capture King

Sharduris, who leapt from his chariot and made hasty escape on

horseback, hotly pursued in the gathering darkness by an Assyrian

contingent of cavalry. Not until "the bridge of the Euphrates" was

reached was the exciting night chase abandoned.

Tiglath-pileser had achieved an overwhelming victory against an army

superior to his own in numbers. Over 70,000 of the enemy were slain or

taken captive, while the Urartian camp with its stores and horses and

followers fell into the hands of the triumphant Assyrians.

Tiglath-pileser burned the royal tent and throne as an offering to

Ashur, and carried Sharduris's bed to the temple of the goddess of

Nineveh, whither he returned to prepare a new plan of campaign against

his northern rival.

Despite the blow dealt against Urartu, Assyria did not immediately

regain possession of north Syria. The shifty Mati-ilu either cherished

the hope that Sharduris would recover strength and again invade north

Syria, or that he might himself establish an empire in that region.

Tiglath-pileser had therefore to march westward again. For three years

he conducted vigorous campaigns in "the western land", where he met

with vigorous resistance. In 740 B.C. Arpad was captured and Mati-ilu

deposed and probably put to death. Two years later Kullani and Hamath

fell, and the districts which they controlled were included in the

Assyrian empire and governed by Crown officials.

Once again the Hebrews came into contact with Assyria. The Dynasty of

Jehu had come to an end by this time. Its fall may not have been

unconnected with the trend of events in Assyria during the closing

years of the Middle Empire.

Supported by Assyria, the kings of Israel had become powerful and

haughty. Jehoash, the grandson of Jehu, had achieved successes in

conflict with Damascus. In Judah the unstable Amaziah, son of Joash,

was strong enough to lay a heavy hand on Edom, and flushed with

triumph then resolved to readjust his relations with his overlord, the

king of Israel. Accordingly he sent a communication to Jehoash which

contained some proposal regarding their political relations,

concluding with the offer or challenge, "Come, let us look one another

in the face". A contemptuous answer was returned.

Jehoash the king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah, saying,

The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in

Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife: and there

passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon, and trode down the

thistle. Thou hast indeed smitten Edom, and thine heart hath

lifted thee up: glory of this, and tarry at home, for why

shouldest thou meddle to thy hurt, that thou shouldest fall, even

thou, and Judah with thee? But Amaziah would not hear. Therefore

Jehoash king of Israel went up; and he and Amaziah king of Judah

looked one another in the face at Beth-shemesh [city of Shamash,

the sun god], which belongeth to Judah. And Judah was put to the

worse before Israel; and they fled every man to their tents.

Jehoash afterwards destroyed a large portion of the wall of Jerusalem

and plundered the temple and palace, returning home to Samaria with

rich booty and hostages.[505] Judah thus remained a vassal state of

Israel's.

Jeroboam, son of Jehoash, had a long and prosperous reign. About 773

B.C. he appears to have co-operated with Assyria and conquered

Damascus and Hamath. His son Zachariah, the last king of the Jehu

Dynasty of Israel, came to the throne in 740 B.C. towards the close of

the reign of Azariah, son of Amaziah, king of Judah. Six months

afterwards he was assassinated by Shallum. This usurper held sway at

Samaria for only a month. "For Menahem the son of Gadi went up from

Tirzah, and came to Samaria, and smote Shallum the son of Jabesh in

Samaria, and slew him, and reigned in his stead."[506]

Tiglath-pileser was operating successfully in middle Syria when he had

dealings with, among others, "Menihimme (Menahem) of the city of the

Samarians", who paid tribute. No resistance was possible on the part

of Menahem, the usurper, who was probably ready to welcome the

Assyrian conqueror, so that, by arranging an alliance, he might secure

his own position. The Biblical reference is as follows: "And Pul the

king of Assyria came against the land: and Menahem gave Pul a thousand

talents of silver, that his hand might be with him to confirm the

kingdom in his hand. And Menahem exacted the money of Israel, even of

all the mighty men of wealth, of each man fifty shekels of silver, to

give to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria turned back, and

stayed not there in the land."[507] Rezin of Damascus, Hiram of Tyre,

and Zabibi, queen of the Arabians, also sent gifts to Tiglath-pileser

at this time (738 B.C.). Aramaean revolts on the borders of Elam were

suppressed by Assyrian governors, and large numbers of the inhabitants

were transported to various places in Syria.

Tiglath-pileser next operated against the Median and other hill tribes

in the north-east. In 735 B.C. he invaded Urartu, the great Armenian

state which had threatened the supremacy of Assyria in north Syria and

Cappadocia. King Sharduris was unable to protect his frontier or

hamper the progress of the advancing army, which penetrated to his

capital. Dhuspas was soon captured, but Sharduris took refuge in his

rocky citadel which he and his predecessors had laboured to render

impregnable. There he was able to defy the might of Assyria, for the

fortress could be approached on the western side alone by a narrow

path between high walls and towers, so that only a small force could

find room to operate against the numerous garrison.

Tiglath-pileser had to content himself by devastating the city on the

plain and the neighbouring villages. He overthrew buildings, destroyed

orchards, and transported to Nineveh those of the inhabitants he had

not put to the sword, with all the live stock he could lay hands on.

Thus was Urartu crippled and humiliated: it never regained its former

prestige among the northern states.

In the following year Tiglath-pileser returned to Syria. The

circumstances which made this expedition necessary are of special

interest on account of its Biblical associations. Menahem, king of

Israel, had died, and was succeeded by his son Pekahiah. "But Pekah

the son of Remaliah, a captain of his, conspired against him and smote

him in Samaria, in the palace of the king's house, ... and he killed

him, and reigned in his room."[508] When Pekah was on the throne, Ahaz

began to reign over Judah.

Judah had taken advantage of the disturbed conditions in Israel to

assert its independence. The walls of Jerusalem were repaired by

Jotham, father of Ahaz, and a tunnel constructed to supply it with

water. Isaiah refers to this tunnel: "Go forth and meet Ahaz ... at

the end of the conduit of the upper pool in the highway of the

fuller's field" (_Isaiah,_ vii, 3).

Pekah had to deal with a powerful party in Israel which favoured the

re-establishment of David's kingdom in Palestine. Their most prominent

leader was the prophet Amos, whose eloquent exhortations were couched

in no uncertain terms. He condemned Israel for its idolatries, and

cried:

For thus saith the Lord unto the house of Israel, Seek ye me and

ye shall live.... Have ye offered unto me sacrifices and offerings

in the wilderness forty years, O house of Israel? But ye have

borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the

star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.[509]

Pekah sought to extinguish the orthodox party's movement by subduing

Judah. So he plotted with Rezin, king of Damascus. Amos prophesied,

Thus saith the Lord.... I will send a fire into the house of

Hazael, which will devour the palaces of Ben-hadad. I will break

also the bar of Damascus ... and the people of Syria shall go into

captivity unto Kir.... The remnant of the Philistines shall

perish.

Tyre, Edom, and Ammon would also be punished.[510] Judah was

completely isolated by the allies who acknowledged the suzerainty of

Damascus. Soon after Ahaz came to the throne he found himself hemmed

in on every side by adversaries who desired to accomplish his fall.

"At that time Rezin, king of Syria, and Pekah ...came up to Jerusalem

to war: and they besieged Ahaz, but could not overcome him."[511]

Judah, however, was overrun; the city of Elath was captured and

restored to Edom, while the Philistines were liberated from the

control of Jerusalem.

Isaiah visited Ahaz and said,

Take heed, and be quiet; fear not, neither be faint-hearted for

the two tails of these smoking firebrands, for the fierce anger of

Rezin with Syria, and of the son of Remaliah. Because Syria,

Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, have taken evil counsel against

thee, saying, Let us go up against Judah, and vex it, and let us

make a breach therein for us, and set a king in the midst of it,

even the son of Tabeal: Thus saith the Lord God, It shall not

stand, neither shall it come to pass.[512]

The unstable Ahaz had sought assistance from the Baal, and "made his

son to pass through the fire, according to the abominations of the

heathen".[513] Then he resolved to purchase the sympathy of one of the

great Powers. There was no hope of assistance from "the fly that is in

the uttermost part of the rivers of Egypt", for the Ethiopian Pharaohs

had not yet conquered the Delta region, so he turned to "the bee that

is in the land of Assyria ".[514] Assyria was the last resource of the

king of Judah.

So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria,

saying, I am thy servant and thy son: come up and save me out of

the hand of Syria and out of the hand of the king of Israel, which

rise up against me. And Ahaz took the silver and gold that was

found in the house of the Lord, and in the treasures of the king's

house, and sent it for a present to the king of Assyria. And the

king of Assyria hearkened unto him: for the king of Assyria went

up against Damascus, and took it, and carried the people of it

captive to Kir[515] and slew Rezin.[516]

Tiglath-pileser recorded that Rezin took refuge in his city like "a

mouse". Israel was also dealt with.

In the days of Pekah king of Israel came Tiglath-pileser king of

Assyria, and took Ijon and Abel-beth-maachah, and Janoah and

Kedesh, and Hazor, and Gilead, and Galilee, all the land of

Naphtali, and carried them captive to Assyria. And Hoshea the son

of Elah made a conspiracy against Pekah the son of Remaliah, and

smote him, and slew him, and reigned in his stead.[517]

Tiglath-pileser recorded: "They overthrew Paqaha (Pekah), their king,

and placed Ausi'a (Hoshea) over them". He swept through Israel "like a

hurricane". The Philistines and the Arabians of the desert were also

subdued. Tribute was sent to the Assyrian monarch by Phoenicia, Moab,

Ammon, and Edom. It was a proud day for Ahaz when he paid a visit to

Tiglath-pileser at Damascus.[518] An Assyrian governor was appointed

to rule over Syria and its subject states.

Babylon next claimed the attention of Tiglath-pileser. Nabonassar had

died and was succeeded by his son Nabu-nadin-zeri, who, after reigning

for two years, was slain in a rebellion. The throne was then seized by

Nabu-shum-ukin, but in less than two months this usurper was

assassinated and the Chaldaeans had one of their chiefs, Ukinzer,

proclaimed king (732 B.C.).

When the Assyrian king returned from Syria in 731 B.C. he invaded

Babylonia. He was met with a stubborn resistance. Ukinzer took refuge

in his capital, Shapia, which held out successfully, although the

surrounding country was ravaged and despoiled. Two years afterwards

Tiglath-pileser returned, captured Shapia, and restored peace

throughout Babylonia. He was welcomed in Babylon, which opened its

gates to him, and he had himself proclaimed king of Sumer and Akkad.

The Chaldaeans paid tribute.

Tiglath-pileser had now reached the height of his ambition. He had not

only extended his empire in the west from Cappadocia to the river of

Egypt, crippled Urartu and pacified his eastern frontier, but brought

Assyria into close union with Babylonia, the mother land, the home of

culture and the land of the ancient gods. He did not live long,

however, to enjoy his final triumph, for he died a little over twelve

months after he "took the hands of Bel (Merodach)" at Babylon.

He was succeeded by Shalmaneser V (727-722 B.C.), who may have been

his son, but this is not quite certain. Little is known regarding his

brief reign. In 725 B.C. he led an expedition to Syria and Phoenicia.

Several of the vassal peoples had revolted when they heard of the

death of Tiglath-pileser. These included the Phoenicians, the

Philistines, and the Israelites who were intriguing with either Egypt

or Mutsri.

Apparently Hoshea, king of Israel, pretended when the Assyrians

entered his country that he remained friendly. Shalmaneser, however,

was well informed, and made Hoshea a prisoner. Samaria closed its

gates against him although their king had been dispatched to Assyria.

The Biblical account of the campaign is as follows: "Against him

(Hoshea) came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria; and Hoshea became his

servant, and gave him presents. And the king of Assyria found

conspiracy in Hoshea: for he had sent messengers to So king of

Egypt,[519] and brought no present to the king of Assyria, as he had

done year by year; therefore the king of Assyria shut him up and bound

him in prison.

"Then the king of Assyria came up throughout all the land, and went up

to Samaria, and besieged it three years."[520]

Shalmaneser died before Samaria was captured, and may have been

assassinated. The next Assyrian monarch, Sargon II (722-705 B.C.), was

not related to either of his two predecessors. He is referred to by

Isaiah,[521] and is the Arkeanos of Ptolemy. He was the Assyrian

monarch who deported the "Lost Ten Tribes".

"In the ninth year of Hoshea" (and the first of Sargon) "the king of

Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria, and placed

them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of

the Medes."[522] In all, according to Sargon's record, "27,290 people

dwelling in the midst of it (Samaria) I carried off".

They (the Israelites) left all the commandments of the Lord their

God, and made them molten images, even two calves, and made a

grove, and worshipped all the host of heaven (the stars), and

served Baal. And they caused their sons and their daughters to

pass through the fire, and used divination and enchantments, and

sold themselves to do evil in the sight of the Lord, to provoke

him to anger. Therefore the Lord was very angry with Israel, and

removed them out of his sight: there was none left but the tribe

of Judah only. And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon,

and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from

Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of

the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in

the cities thereof.... And the men of Babylon made Succoth-benoth,

and the men of Cuth (Cuthah) made Nergal, and the men of Hamath

made Ashima, and the Avites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the

Sepharites burnt their children in fire to Adram-melech and

Anam-melech, the gods of Sepharvaim.

A number of the new settlers were slain by lions, and the king of

Assyria ordered that a Samaritan priest should be sent to "teach them

the manner of the God of the land". This man was evidently an orthodox

Hebrew, for he taught them "how they should fear the Lord.... So they

feared the Lord", but also "served their own gods ... their graven

images".[523]

There is no evidence to suggest that the "Ten Lost Tribes", "regarding

whom so many nonsensical theories have been formed", were not

ultimately absorbed by the peoples among whom they settled between

Mesopotamia and the Median Highlands.[524] The various sections must

have soon lost touch with one another. They were not united like the

Jews (the people of Judah), who were transported to Babylonia a

century and a half later, by a common religious bond, for although a

few remained faithful to Abraham's God, the majority of the Israelites

worshipped either the Baal or the Queen of Heaven.

The Assyrian policy of transporting the rebellious inhabitants of one

part of their empire to another was intended to break their national

spirit and compel them to become good and faithful subjects amongst

the aliens, who must have disliked them. "The colonists," says

Professor Maspero, "exposed to the same hatred as the original

Assyrian conquerors, soon forgot to look upon the latter as the

oppressors of all, and, allowing their present grudge to efface the

memory of past injuries, did not hesitate to make common cause with

them. In time of peace the (Assyrian) governor did his best to protect

them against molestation on the part of the natives, and in return for

this they rallied round him whenever the latter threatened to get out

of hand, and helped him to stifle the revolt, or hold it in check

until the arrival of reinforcements. Thanks to their help, the empire

was consolidated and maintained without too many violent outbreaks in

regions far removed from the capital, and beyond the immediate reach

of the sovereign."[525]

While Sargon was absent in the west, a revolt broke out in Babylonia.

A Chaldaean king, Merodach Baladan III, had allied himself with the

Elamites, and occupied Babylon. A battle was fought at Dur-ilu and the

Elamites retreated. Although Sargon swept triumphantly through the

land, he had to leave his rival, the tyrannous Chaldaean, in

possession of the capital, and he reigned there for over eleven years.

Trouble was brewing in Syria. It was apparently fostered by an

Egyptian king--probably Bocchoris of Sais, the sole Pharaoh so far as

can be ascertained of the Twenty-fourth Dynasty, who had allied

himself with the local dynasts of Lower Egypt and apparently sought to

extend his sway into Asia, the Ethiopians being supreme in Upper

Egypt. An alliance had been formed to cast off the yoke of Assyria.

The city states involved Arpad, Simirra, Damascus, Samaria, and Gaza.

Hanno of Gaza had fled to Egypt after Tiglath-pileser came to the

relief of Judah and broke up the league of conspirators by capturing

Damascus, and punishing Samaria, Gaza, and other cities. His return in

Sargon's reign was evidently connected with the new rising in which he

took part. The throne of Hamath had been seized by an adventurer,

named Ilu-bi´di, a smith. The Philistines of Ashdod and the Arabians

being strongly pro-Egyptian in tendency, were willing sympathizers and

helpers against the hated Assyrians.

Sargon appeared in the west with a strong army before the allies had

matured their plans. He met the smith king of Hamath in battle at

Qarqar, and, having defeated him, had him skinned alive. Then he

marched southward. At Rapiki (Raphia) he routed an army of allies.

Shabi (?So), the Tartan (commander-in-chief) of Pi´ru[526] (Pharaoh),

King of Mutsri (an Arabian state confused, perhaps, with Misraim =

Egypt), escaped "like to a shepherd whose sheep have been taken". Piru

and other two southern kings, Samsi and Itamara, afterwards paid

tribute to Sargon. Hanno of Gaza was transported to Asshur.

In 715 B.C. Sargon, according to his records, appeared with his army

in Arabia, and received gifts in token of homage from Piru of Mutsri,

Samsi of Aribi, and Itamara of Saba.

Four years later a revolt broke out in Ashdod which was, it would

appear, directly due to the influence of Shabaka, the Ethiopian

Pharaoh, who had deposed Bocchoris of Sais. Another league was about

to be formed against Assyria. King Azuri of Ashdod had been deposed

because of his Egyptian sympathies by the Assyrian governor, and his

brother Akhimiti was placed on the throne. The citizens, however,

overthrew Akhimiti, and an adventurer from Cyprus was proclaimed king

(711 B.C).

It would appear that advances were made by the anti-Assyrians to Ahaz

of Judah. That monarch was placed in a difficult position. He knew

that if the allies succeeded in stamping out Assyrian authority in

Syria and Palestine they would certainly depose him, but if on the

other hand he joined them and Assyria triumphed, its emperor would

show him small mercy. As Babylon defied Sargon and received the active

support of Elam, and there were rumours of risings in the north, it

must have seemed to the western kings as if the Assyrian empire was

likely once again to go to pieces.

Fortunately for Ahaz he had a wise counsellor at this time in the

great statesman and prophet, the scholarly Isaiah. The Lord spake by

Isaiah saying, "Go and loose the sackcloth from off thy loins, and put

off thy shoe from thy foot. And he did so, walking naked and barefoot.

And the Lord said, Like as my servant Isaiah hath walked naked and

barefoot three years for a sign and wonder upon Egypt and upon

Ethiopia; so shall the king of Assyria lead away the Egyptians

prisoners.... And they (the allies) shall be afraid and ashamed of

Ethiopia their expectation, and of Egypt their glory."[527]

Isaiah warned Ahaz against joining the league, "in the year that

Tartan[528] came unto Ashdod (when Sargon the king of Assyria sent

him)". The Tartan "fought against Ashdod and took it".[529] According

to Sargon's record the Pretender of Ashdod fled to Arabia, where he

was seized by an Arabian chief and delivered up to Assyria. The

pro-Egyptian party in Palestine went under a cloud for a period

thereafter.

Before Sargon could deal with Merodach Baladan of Babylon, he found it

necessary to pursue the arduous task of breaking up a powerful league

which had been formed against him in the north. The Syro-Cappadocian

Hittite states, including Tabal in Asia Minor and Carchemish in north

Syria, were combining for the last time against Assyria, supported by

Mita (Midas), king of the Muski-Phrygians, and Rusas, son of Sharduris

III, king of Urartu.

Urartu had recovered somewhat from the disasters which it had suffered

at the hands of Tiglath-pileser, and was winning back portions of its

lost territory on the north-east frontier of Assyria. A buffer state

had been formed in that area by Tiglath-pileser, who had assisted the

king of the Mannai to weld together the hill tribesmen between Lake

Van and Lake Urmia into an organized nation. Iranzu, its ruler,

remained faithful to Assyria and consequently became involved in war

with Rusas of Urartu, who either captured or won over several cities

of the Mannai. Iranzu was succeeded by his son Aza, and this king was

so pronounced a pro-Assyrian that his pro-Urartian subjects

assassinated him and set on the throne Bagdatti of Umildish.

Soon after Sargon began his operations in the north he captured

Bagdatti and had him skinned alive. The flag of revolt, however, was

kept flying by his brother, Ullusunu, but ere long this ambitious man

found it prudent to submit to Sargon on condition that he would retain

the throne as a faithful Assyrian vassal. His sudden change of policy

appears to have been due to the steady advance of the Median tribes

into the territory of the Mannai. Sargon conducted a vigorous and

successful campaign against the raiders, and extended Ullusunu's area

of control.

The way was now clear to Urartu. In 714 B.C. Sargon attacked the

revolting king of Zikirtu, who was supported by an army led by Rusas,

his overlord. A fierce battle was fought in which the Assyrians

achieved a great victory. King Rusas fled, and when he found that the

Assyrians pressed home their triumph by laying waste the country

before them, he committed suicide, according to the Assyrian records,

although those of Urartu indicate that he subsequently took part in

the struggle against Sargon. The Armenian peoples were compelled to

acknowledge the suzerainty of Assyria, and the conqueror received

gifts from various tribes between Lake Van and the Caspian Sea, and

along the frontiers from Lake Van towards the south-east as far as the

borders of Elam.

Rusas of Urartu was succeeded by Argistes II, who reigned over a

shrunken kingdom. He intrigued with neighbouring states against

Assyria, but was closely watched. Ere long he found himself caught

between two fires. During his reign the notorious Cimmerians and

Scythians displayed much activity in the north and raided his

territory.

The pressure of fresh infusions of Thraco-Phrygian tribes into western

Asia Minor had stirred Midas of the Muski to co-operate with the

Urartian power in an attempt to stamp out Assyrian influence in

Cilicia, Cappadocia, and north Syria. A revolt in Tabal in 718 B.C.

was extinguished by Sargon, but in the following year evidences were

forthcoming of a more serious and widespread rising. Pisiris, king of

Carchemish, threw off the Assyrian yoke. Before, however, his allies

could hasten to his assistance he was overcome by the vigilant Sargon,

who deported a large proportion of the city's inhabitants and

incorporated it in an Assyrian province. Tabal revolted in 713 B.C.

and was similarly dealt with. In 712 B.C. Milid had to be overcome.

The inhabitants were transported, and "Suti" Aramaean peoples settled

in their homes. The king of Commagene, having remained faithful,

received large extensions of territory. Finally in 709 B.C. Midas of

the Muski-Phrygians was compelled to acknowledge the suzerainty of

Assyria. The northern confederacy was thus completely worsted and

broken up. Tribute was paid by many peoples, including the rulers of

Cyprus.

Sargon was now able to deal with Babylonia, which for about twelve

years had been ruled by Merodach Baladan, who oppressed the people and

set at defiance ancient laws by seizing private estates and

transferring them to his Chaldaean kinsmen. He still received the

active support of Elam.

Sargon's first move was to interpose his army between those of the

Babylonians and Elamites. Pushing southward, he subdued the Aramaeans

on the eastern banks of the Tigris, and drove the Elamites into the

mountains. Then he invaded middle Babylonia from the east. Merodach

Baladan hastily evacuated Babylon, and, moving southward, succeeded in

evading Sargon's army. Finding Elam was unable to help him, he took

refuge in the Chaldaean capital, Bit Jakin, in southern Babylonia.

Sargon was visited by the priests of Babylon and Borsippa, and hailed

as the saviour of the ancient kingdom. He was afterwards proclaimed

king at E-sagila, where he "took the hands of Bel". Then having

expelled the Aramaeans from Sippar, he hastened southward, attacked

Bit Jakin and captured it. Merodach Baladan escaped into Elam. The

whole of Chaldaea was subdued.

Thus "Sargon the Later" entered at length into full possession of the

empire of Sargon of Akkad. In Babylonia he posed as an incarnation of

his ancient namesake, and had similarly Messianic pretensions which

were no doubt inspired by the Babylonian priesthood. Under him Assyria

attained its highest degree of splendour.

He recorded proudly not only his great conquests but also his works of

public utility: he restored ancient cities, irrigated vast tracts of

country, fostered trade, and promoted the industries. Like the pious

Pharaohs of Egypt he boasted that he fed the hungry and protected the

weak against the strong.

Sargon found time during his strenuous career as a conqueror to lay

out and build a new city, called Dur-Sharrukin, "the burgh of Sargon",

to the north of Nineveh. It was completed before he undertook the

Babylonian campaign. The new palace was occupied in 708 B.C. Previous

to that period he had resided principally at Kalkhi, in the restored

palace of Ashur-natsir-pal III.

He was a worshipper of many gods. Although he claimed to have restored

the supremacy of Asshur "which had come to an end", he not only adored

Ashur but also revived the ancient triad of Anu, Bel, and Ea, and

fostered the growth of the immemorial "mother-cult" of Ishtar. Before

he died he appointed one of his sons, Sennacherib, viceroy of the

northern portion of the empire. He was either assassinated at a

military review or in some frontier war. As much is suggested by the

following entry in an eponym list.

Eponymy of Upahhir-belu, prefect of the city of Amedu ...

According to the oracle of the Kulummite(s).... A soldier

(entered) the camp of the king of Assyria (and killed him?), month

Ab, day 12th, Sennacherib (sat on the throne).[530]

The fact that Sennacherib lamented his father's sins suggests that the

old king had in some manner offended the priesthood. Perhaps, like

some of the Middle Empire monarchs, he succumbed to the influence of

Babylon during the closing years of his life. It is stated that "he

was not buried in his house", which suggests that the customary

religious rites were denied him, and that his lost soul was supposed

to be a wanderer which had to eat offal and drink impure water like

the ghost of a pauper or a criminal.

The task which lay before Sennacherib (705-680 B.C.) was to maintain

the unity of the great empire of his distinguished father. He waged

minor wars against the Kassite and Illipi tribes on the Elamite

border, and the Muski and Hittite tribes in Cappadocia and Cilicia.

The Kassites, however, were no longer of any importance, and the

Hittite power had been extinguished, for ere the states could recover

from the blows dealt by the Assyrians the Cimmerian hordes ravaged

their territory. Urartu was also overrun by the fierce barbarians from

the north. It was one of these last visits of the Assyrians to Tabal

of the Hittites and the land of the Muski (Meshech) which the Hebrew

prophet referred to in after-time when he exclaimed:

Asshur is there and all her company: his graves are about him:

all of them slain, fallen by the sword.... There is Meshech,

Tubal, and all her multitude: her graves are round about him: all

of them uncircumcised, slain by the sword, though they caused

their terror in the land of the living.... (_Ezekiel_, xxxii.)

Sennacherib found that Ionians had settled in Cilicia, and he deported

large numbers of them to Nineveh. The metal and ivory work at Nineveh

show traces of Greek influence after this period.

A great conspiracy was fomented in several states against Sennacherib

when the intelligence of Sargon's death was bruited abroad. Egypt was

concerned in it. Taharka (the Biblical Tirhakah[531]), the last

Pharaoh of the Ethiopian Dynasty, had dreams of re-establishing

Egyptian supremacy in Palestine and Syria, and leagued himself with

Luli, king of Tyre, Hezekiah, king of Judah, and others. Merodach

Baladan, the Chaldaean king, whom Sargon had deposed, supported by

Elamites and Aramaeans, was also a party to the conspiracy. "At that

time Merodach Baladan, the son of Baladan, king of Babylon, sent

letters and a present to Hezekiah.... And Hezekiah was glad of

them."[532]

Merodach Baladan again seized the throne of Babylon. Sargon's son, who

had been appointed governor, was murdered and a pretender sat on the

throne for a brief period, but Merodach Baladan thrust him aside and

reigned for nine months, during which period he busied himself by

encouraging the kings of Judah and Tyre to revolt. Sennacherib invaded

Babylonia with a strong army, deposed Merodach Baladan, routed the

Chaldaeans and Aramaeans, and appointed as vassal king Bel-ibni, a

native prince, who remained faithful to Assyria for about three years.

In 707 B.C. Sennacherib appeared in the west. When he approached Tyre,

Luli, the king, fled to Cyprus. The city was not captured, but much of

its territory was ceded to the king of Sidon. Askalon was afterwards

reduced. At Eltekeh Sennacherib came into conflict with an army of

allies, including Ethiopian, Egyptian, and Arabian Mutsri forces,

which he routed. Then he captured a number of cities in Judah and

transported 200,150 people. He was unable, however, to enter

Jerusalem, in which Hezekiah was compelled to remain "like a bird in a

cage". It appears that Hezekiah "bought off" the Assyrians on this

occasion with gifts of gold and silver and jewels, costly furniture,

musicians, and female slaves.

In 689 B.C. Sennacherib found it necessary to penetrate Arabia.

Apparently another conspiracy was brewing, for Hezekiah again

revolted. On his return from the south--according to Berosus he had

been in Egypt--the Assyrian king marched against the king of Judah.

And when Hezekiah saw that Sennacherib was come, and that he was

purposed to fight against Jerusalem, he took counsel with the

princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the fountains

which were without the city: and they did help him.... Why should

the kings of Assyria come and find much water?

Sennacherib sent messengers to Jerusalem to attempt to stir up the

people against Hezekiah. "He wrote also letters to rail on the Lord

God of Israel, and to speak against him, saying, As the gods of the

nations of other lands have not delivered their people out of mine

hand, so shall not the God of Hezekiah deliver his people out of mine

hand."[533]

Hezekiah sent his servants to Isaiah, who was in Jerusalem at the

time, and the prophet said to them:

Thus shall ye say to your master. Thus saith the Lord, Be not

afraid of the words which thou hast heard, with which the servants

of the king of Assyria have blasphemed me. Behold, I will send a

blast upon him, and he shall hear a rumour, and shall return to

his own land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own

land.[534]

According to Berosus, the Babylonian priestly historian, the camp of

Sennacherib was visited in the night by swarms of field mice which ate

up the quivers and bows and the (leather) handles of shields. Next

morning the army fled.

The Biblical account of the disaster is as follows:

And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went

out, and smote the camp of the Assyrians an hundred and four score

and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning,

behold, they were all dead corpses. So Sennacherib king of Assyria

departed, and went and returned and dwelt at Nineveh.[535]

A pestilence may have broken out in the camp, the infection, perhaps,

having been carried by field mice. Byron's imagination was stirred by

the vision of the broken army of Assyria.

The Assyrian came down like a wolf on the fold,

And his cohorts were gleaming with purple and gold;

And the sheen of their spears was like stars of the sea,

When the blue wave rolls nightly on deep Galilee.

Like the leaves of the forest when summer is green,

That host with their banners at sunset were seen;

Like the leaves of the forest when autumn hath blown,

That host on the morrow lay withered and strown.

For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast,

And breathed on the face of the foe as he passed;

And the eyes of the sleepers waxed deadly and chill,

And their hearts but once heaved--and forever grew still!

And there lay the steed with his nostril all wide,

But through it there rolled not the breath of his pride;

And the foam of his gasping lay white on the turf,

And cold as the spray of the rock-beating surf.

And there lay the rider distorted and pale,

With the dew on his brow, and the rust on his mail;

And the tents were all silent--the banners alone--

Thelances uplifted--the trumpet unblown.

And the widows of Asshur are loud in their wail,

And the idols are broke in the temple of Baal;

And the might of the Gentile, unsmote by the sword,

Hath melted like snow in the glance of the Lord.

Before this disaster occurred Sennacherib had to invade Babylonia

again, for the vassal king, Bel-ibni, had allied himself with the

Chaldaeans and raised the standard of revolt. The city of Babylon was

besieged and captured, and its unfaithful king deported with a number

of nobles to Assyria. Old Merodach Baladan was concerned in the plot

and took refuge on the Elamite coast, where the Chaldaeans had formed

a colony. He died soon afterwards.

Sennacherib operated in southern Babylonia and invaded Elam. But ere

he could return to Assyria he was opposed by a strong army of allies,

including Babylonians, Chaldaeans, Aramaeans, Elamites, and Persians,

led by Samunu, son of Merodach Baladan. A desperate battle was fought.

Although Sennacherib claimed a victory, he was unable to follow it up.

This was in 692 B.C. A Chaldaean named Mushezib-Merodach seized the

Babylonian throne.

In 691 B.C. Sennacherib again struck a blow for Babylonia, but was

unable to depose Mushezib-Merodach. His opportunity came, however, in

689 B.C. Elam had been crippled by raids of the men of Parsua

(Persia), and was unable to co-operate with the Chaldaean king of

Babylon. Sennacherib captured the great commercial metropolis, took

Mushezib-Merodach prisoner, and dispatched him to Nineveh. Then he

wreaked his vengeance on Babylon. For several days the Assyrian

soldiers looted the houses and temples, and slaughtered the

inhabitants without mercy. E-sagila was robbed of its treasures,

images of deities were either broken in pieces or sent to Nineveh: the

statue of Bel-Merodach was dispatched to Asshur so that he might take

his place among the gods who were vassals of Ashur. "The city and its

houses," Sennacherib recorded, "from foundation to roof, I destroyed

them, I demolished them, I burned them with fire; walls, gateways,

sacred chapels, and the towers of earth and tiles, I laid them low and

cast them into the Arakhtu."[536]

"So thorough was Sennacherib's destruction of the city in 689 B.C.,"

writes Mr. King, "that after several years of work, Dr. Koldewey

concluded that all traces of earlier buildings had been destroyed on

that occasion. More recently some remains of earlier strata have been

recognized, and contract-tablets have been found which date from the

period of the First Dynasty. Moreover, a number of earlier pot-burials

have been unearthed, but a careful examination of the greater part of

the ruins has added little to our knowledge of this most famous city

before the Neo-Babylonian period."[537]

It is possible that Sennacherib desired to supplant Babylon as a

commercial metropolis by Nineveh. He extended and fortified that city,

surrounding it with two walls protected by moats. According to

Diodorus, the walls were a hundred feet high and about fifty feet

wide. Excavators have found that at the gates they were about a

hundred feet in breadth. The water supply of the city was ensured by

the construction of dams and canals, and strong quays were erected to

prevent flooding. Sennacherib repaired a lofty platform which was

isolated by a canal, and erected upon it his great palace. On another

platform he had an arsenal built.

Sennacherib's palace was the most magnificent building of its kind

ever erected by an Assyrian emperor. It was lavishly decorated, and

its bas-reliefs display native art at its highest pitch of excellence.

The literary remains of the time also give indication of the growth of

culture: the inscriptions are distinguished by their prose style. It

is evident that men of culture and refinement were numerous in

Assyria. The royal library of Kalkhi received many additions during

the reign of the destroyer of Babylon.

Like his father, Sennacherib died a violent death. According to the

Babylonian Chronicle he was slain in a revolt by his son "on the

twentieth day of Tebet" (680 B.C). The revolt continued from the "20th

of Tebet" (early in January) until the 2nd day of Adar (the middle of

February). On the 18th of Adar, Esarhaddon, son of Sennacherib, was

proclaimed king.

Berosus states that Sennacherib was murdered by two of his sons, but

Esarhaddon was not one of the conspirators. The Biblical reference is

as follows: "Sennacherib ... dwelt at Nineveh. And it came to pass, as

he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch (?Ashur) his god, that

Adrammelech and Sharezer (Ashur-shar-etir) his sons smote him with the

sword: and they escaped into the land of Armenia (Urartu). And

Esarhaddon his son reigned in his stead." Ashur-shar-etir appears to

have been the claimant to the throne.

Esarhaddon (680-668 B.C.) was a man of different type from his father.

He adopted towards vassal states a policy of conciliation, and did

much to secure peace within the empire by his magnanimous treatment of

rebel kings who had been intimidated by their neighbours and forced to

entwine themselves in the meshes of intrigue. His wars were directed

mainly to secure the protection of outlying provinces against

aggressive raiders.

The monarch was strongly influenced by his mother, Naki'a, a

Babylonian princess who appears to have been as distinguished a lady

as the famous Sammu-rammat. Indeed, it is possible that traditions

regarding her contributed to the Semiramis legends. But it was not

only due to her that Esarhaddon espoused the cause of the

pro-Babylonian party. He appears to be identical with the Axerdes of

Berosus, who ruled over the southern kingdom for eight years.

Apparently he had been appointed governor by Sennacherib after the

destruction of Babylon, and it may be that during his term of office

in Babylonia he was attracted by its ethical ideals, and developed

those traits of character which distinguished him from his father and

grandfather. He married a Babylonian princess, and one of his sons,

Shamash-shum-ukin, was born in a Babylonian palace, probably at

Sippar. He was a worshipper of the mother goddess Ishtar of Nineveh

and Ishtar of Arbela, and of Shamash, as well as of the national god

Ashur.

As soon as Esarhaddon came to the throne he undertook the restoration

of Babylon, to which many of the inhabitants were drifting back. In

three years the city resumed its pre-eminent position as a trading and

industrial centre. Withal, he won the hearts of the natives by

expelling Chaldaeans from the private estates which they had seized

during the Merodach-Baladan regime, and restoring them to the rightful

heirs.

A Chaldaean revolt was inevitable. Two of Merodach Baladan's sons gave

trouble in the south, but were routed in battle. One fled to Elam,

where he was assassinated; the other sued for peace, and was accepted

by the diplomatic Esarhaddon as a vassal king.

Egypt was intriguing in the west. Its Ethiopian king, Taharka (the

Biblical Tirhakah) had stirred up Hezekiah to revolt during

Sennacherib's reign. An Assyrian ambassador who had visited Jerusalem

"heard say concerning Tirhakah.... He sent messengers to Hezekiah

saying.... Let not thy God, in whom thou trustest, deceive thee

saying, Jerusalem shall not be given into the hand of the king of

Assyria. Behold, thou hast heard what the kings of Assyria have done

to all lands by destroying them utterly; and shalt thou be delivered?

Have the gods of the nations delivered them which my fathers have

destroyed, as Gozan, and Haran, and Rezeph, and the children of Eden

which were in Telassar? Where is the king of Hamath, and the king of

Arphad, and the king of the city of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivah?"[538]

Sidon was a party to the pro-Egyptian league which had been formed in

Palestine and Syria.

Early in his reign Esarhaddon conducted military operations in the

west, and during his absence the queen-mother Naki'a held the reins of

government. The Elamites regarded this innovation as a sign of

weakness, and invaded Babylon. Sippar was plundered, and its gods

carried away. The Assyrian governors, however, ultimately repulsed the

Elamite king, who was deposed soon after he returned home. His son,

who succeeded him, restored the stolen gods, and cultivated good

relations with Esarhaddon. There was great unrest in Elam at this

period: it suffered greatly from the inroads of Median and Persian

pastoral fighting folk.

In the north the Cimmerians and Scythians, who were constantly warring

against Urartu, and against each other, had spread themselves westward

and east. Esarhaddon drove Cimmerian invaders out of Cappadocia, and

they swamped Phrygia.

The Scythian peril on the north-east frontier was, however, of more

pronounced character. The fierce mountaineers had allied themselves

with Median tribes and overrun the buffer State of the Mannai. Both

Urartu and Assyria were sufferers from the brigandage of these allies.

Esarhaddon's generals, however, were able to deal with the situation,

and one of the notable results of the pacification of the

north-eastern area was the conclusion of an alliance with Urartu.

The most serious situation with which the emperor had to deal was in

the west. The King of Sidon, who had been so greatly favoured by

Sennacherib, had espoused the Egyptian cause. He allied himself with

the King of Cilicia, who, however, was unable to help him much. Sidon

was besieged and captured; the royal allies escaped, but a few years

later were caught and beheaded. The famous seaport was destroyed, and

its vast treasures deported to Assyria (about 676 B.C). Esarhaddon

replaced it by a new city called Kar-Esarhaddon, which formed the

nucleus of the new Sidon.

It is believed that Judah and other disaffected States were dealt with

about this time. Manasseh had succeeded Hezekiah at Jerusalem when but

a boy of twelve years. He appears to have come under the influence of

heathen teachers.

For he built up again the high places which Hezekiah his father

had destroyed; and he reared up altars for Baal, and made a grove,

as did Ahab king of Israel; and worshipped all the host of heaven,

and served them.... And he built altars for all the host of heaven

in the two courts of the house of the Lord. And he made his son

pass through the fire, and observed times, and used enchantments,

and dealt with familiar spirits and wizards: he wrought much

wickedness in the sight of the Lord, to provoke him to anger. And

he set a graven image of the grove that he had made in the house,

of which the Lord said to David, and to Solomon his son, In this

house, and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all tribes of

Israel, will I put my name for ever.[539]

Isaiah ceased to prophesy after Manasseh came to the throne. According

to Rabbinic traditions he was seized by his enemies and enclosed in

the hollow trunk of a tree, which was sawn through. Other orthodox

teachers appear to have been slain also. "Manasseh shed innocent blood

very much, till he had filled Jerusalem from one end to another."[540]

It is possible that there is a reference to Isaiah's fate in an early

Christian lament regarding the persecutions of the faithful: "Others

had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of bonds and

imprisonment: they were stoned, _they were sawn asunder_, were

tempted, were slain with the sword".[541] There is no Assyrian

evidence regarding the captivity of Manasseh. "Wherefore the Lord

brought upon them (the people of Judah) the captains of the host of

the king of Assyria, which took Manasseh among the thorns, and bound

him with fetters, and carried him to Babylon. And when he was in

affliction, he besought the Lord his God, and humbled himself greatly

before the God of his fathers, and prayed unto him: and he was

intreated of him, and heard his supplication, and brought him again to

Jerusalem into his kingdom."[542] It was, however, in keeping with the

policy of Esarhaddon to deal in this manner with an erring vassal. The

Assyrian records include Manasseh of Judah (Menasê of the city of

Yaudu) with the kings of Edom, Moab, Ammon, Tyre, Ashdod, Gaza,

Byblos, &c, and "twenty-two kings of Khatti" as payers of tribute to

Esarhaddon, their overlord. Hazael of Arabia was conciliated by having

restored to him his gods which Sennacherib had carried away.

Egypt continued to intrigue against Assyria, and Esarhaddon resolved

to deal effectively with Taharka, the last Ethiopian Pharaoh. In 674

B.C. he invaded Egypt, but suffered a reverse and had to retreat. Tyre

revolted soon afterwards (673 B.C).

Esarhaddon, however, made elaborate preparations for his next

campaign. In 671 B.C. he went westward with a much more powerful army.

A detachment advanced to Tyre and invested it. The main force

meanwhile pushed on, crossed the Delta frontier, and swept

victoriously as far south as Memphis, where Taharka suffered a

crushing defeat. That great Egyptian metropolis was then occupied and

plundered by the soldiers of Esarhaddon. Lower Egypt became an

Assyrian province; the various petty kings, including Necho of Sais,

had set over them Assyrian governors. Tyre was also captured.

When he returned home Esarhaddon erected at the Syro-Cappadocian city

of Singirli[543] a statue of victory, which is now in the Berlin

museum. On this memorial the Assyrian "King of the kings of Egypt" is

depicted as a giant. With one hand he pours out an oblation to a god;

in the other he grasps his sceptre and two cords attached to rings,

which pierce the lips of dwarfish figures representing the Pharaoh

Taharka of Egypt and the unfaithful King of Tyre.

In 668 B.C. Taharka, who had fled to Napata in Ethiopia, returned to

Upper Egypt, and began to stir up revolts. Esarhaddon planned out

another expedition, so that he might shatter the last vestige of power

possessed by his rival. But before he left home he found it necessary

to set his kingdom in order.

During his absence from home the old Assyrian party, who disliked the

emperor because of Babylonian sympathies, had been intriguing

regarding the succession to the throne. According to the Babylonian

Chronicle, "the king remained in Assyria" during 669 B.C., "and he

slew with the sword many noble men". Ashur-bani-pal was evidently

concerned in the conspiracy, and it is significant to find that he

pleaded on behalf of certain of the conspirators. The crown prince

Sinidinabal was dead: perhaps he had been assassinated.

At the feast of the goddess Gula (identical with Bau, consort of

Ninip), towards the end of April in 668 B.C., Esarhaddon divided his

empire between two of his sons. Ashur-bani-pal was selected to be King

of Assyria, and Shamash-shum-ukin to be King of Babylon and the vassal

of Ashur-banipal. Other sons received important priestly appointments.

Soon after these arrangements were completed Esarhaddon, who was

suffering from bad health, set out for Egypt. He died towards the end

of October, and the early incidents of his campaign were included in

the records of Ashur-bani-pal's reign. Taharka was defeated at

Memphis, and retreated southward to Thebes.

So passed away the man who has been eulogized as "the noblest and most

sympathetic figure among the Assyrian kings". There was certainly much

which was attractive in his character. He inaugurated many social

reforms, and appears to have held in check his overbearing nobles.

Trade flourished during his reign. He did not undertake the erection

of a new city, like his father, but won the gratitude of the

priesthood by his activities as a builder and restorer of temples. He

founded a new "house of Ashur" at Nineveh, and reconstructed several

temples in Babylonia. His son Ashur-bani-pal was the last great

Assyrian ruler.

Myths of Babylonia and Assyria · 第 19 / 20 章