Over 80 per cent of the population are engaged in farming. They

live from hand to mouth. They have no reserve whatever. If the

monsoon fails nothing will grow, and they have no money to import

food for themselves and their cattle from more fortunate sections.

Hence they are helpless. As a rule the monsoons are very reliable,

but every few years they fail, and a famine results. The government

has a meteorological department, with observers stationed at

several points in Africa and Arabia and in the islands of the

sea, to record and report the actions of nature. Thus it has been

able of late years to anticipate the fat and the lean harvests. It

is possible to predict almost precisely several months in advance

whether there will be a failure of crops, and a permanent famine

commission has been organized to prepare measures of relief before

they are needed. In other words, Lord Curzon and his official

associates are reducing famine relief to a system which promotes

economy as well as efficiency.

It is an interesting fact that the monsoon currents which cross

the Indian Ocean from South Africa continue on their course through

Australia after visiting India, and recent famines in the latter

country have coincided with the droughts which caused much injury

to stock in the former. Thus it has been demonstrated that both

countries depend upon the same conditions for their rainfall,

except that human beings suffer in India while only sheep die

of hunger in the Australian colonies.

The worst famine ever known in India occurred in 1770, when Governor

General Warren Hastings reported that one-third of the inhabitants

of Bengal perished from hunger--ten millions out of thirty millions.

The streets of Calcutta and other towns were actually blocked

up with the bodies of the dead, which were thrown out of doors

and windows because there was no means or opportunity to bury

them. The empire has been stricken almost as hard during the

last ten years. The development of civilization seems to make

a little difference, for the famine of 1900-1901 was perhaps

second in severity to that of 1770. This, however, was largely

due to the fact that the population had not had time to recover

from the famine of 1896-97, which was almost as severe, although

everything possible was done to relieve distress and prevent

the spread of plagues and pestilence that are the natural and

unavoidable consequences of insufficient nourishment.

No precautions that sanitary science can suggest have been omitted,

yet the weekly reports now show an average of twenty thousand

deaths from the bubonic plague alone. The officials explain that

that isn't so high a rate as inexperienced people infer, considering

that the population is nearly three hundred millions, and they

declare it miraculous that it is not larger, because the Hindu

portion of the population is packed so densely into insanitary

dwellings, because only a small portion of the natives have

sufficient nourishment to meet the demands of nature and are

constantly exposed to influences that produce and spread disease.

The death rate is always very high in India for these reasons.

But it seems very small when compared with the awful mortality

caused by the frequent famines. The mind almost refuses to accept

the figures that are presented; it does not seem possible in the

present age, with all our methods for alleviating suffering,

that millions of people can actually die of hunger in a land

of railroads and steamships and other facilities for the

transportation of food. It seems beyond comprehension, yet the

official returns justify the acceptance of the maximum figures

reported.

The loss of human life from starvation in British India alone

during the famine of 1900-1901 is estimated at 1,236,855, and

this is declared to be the minimum. In a country of the area

of India, inhabited by a superstitious, secretive and ignorant

population, it is impossible to compel the natives to report

accidents and deaths, particularly among the Brahmins, who burn

instead of bury their dead. Those who know best assert that at

least 15 per cent of the deaths are not reported in times of

famines and epidemics. And the enormous estimate I have given

does not include any of the native states, which have one-third

of the area and one-fourth of the population of the empire. In

some of them sanitary regulations are observed, and statistics

are accurately reported. In others no attempt is made to keep

a registry of deaths, and there are no means of ascertaining

the mortality, particularly in times of excitement. In these

little principalities the peasants have, comparatively speaking,

no medical attendance; they are dependent upon ignorant fakirs

and sorcerers, and they die off like flies, without even leaving

a record of their disappearance. Therefore the only way of

ascertaining the mortality of those sections is to make deductions

from the returns of the census, which is taken with more or less

accuracy every ten years.

[Illustration: AN EKKA OR ROAD CART]

The census of 1901 tells a terrible tale of human suffering and

death during the previous decade, which was marked by two famines

and several epidemics of cholera, smallpox and other contagious

diseases. Taking the whole of India together, the returns show

that during the ten years from 1892 to 1901, inclusive, there

was an increase of less than 6,000,000 instead of the normal

increase of 19,000,000, which was to be expected, judging by

the records of the previous decades of the country. More than

10,000,000 people disappeared in the native states alone without

leaving a trace behind them.

The official report of the home secretary shows that Baroda State

lost 460,000, or 19.23 per cent of its population.

The Rajputana states lost 2,175,000, or 18.1 per cent of their

population.

The central states lost 1,817,000, or 17.5 per cent.

Bombay Province lost 1,168,000, or 14.5 per cent.

The central provinces lost 939,000, or 8.71 per cent.

These are the provinces that suffered most from the famine, and

therefore show the largest decrease in population.

The famine of 1900-01 affected an area of more than four hundred

thousand square miles and a population exceeding sixty millions,

of whom twenty-five millions belong in the provinces of British

India and thirty-five millions to the native states.

"Within this area," Lord Curzon says, "the famine conditions

for the greater part of a year were intense. Outside it they

extended with a gradually dwindling radius over wide districts

which suffered much from loss of crops and cattle, if not from

actual scarcity. In a greater or less degree in 1900-01 nearly

one-fourth of the entire population of the Indian continent came

within the range of relief operations.

"It is difficult to express in figures with any close degree

of accuracy the loss occasioned by so widespread and severe a

visitation. But it may be roughly put in this way: The annual

agricultural product of India averages in value between two and

three hundred thousand pounds sterling. On a very cautious estimate

the production in 1899-1900 must have been at least one-quarter

if not one-third below the average. At normal prices this loss

was at least fifty million pounds sterling, or, in round numbers,

two hundred and fifty million dollars in American money. But,

in reality, the loss fell on a portion only of the continent,

and ranged from total failure of crops in certain sections to

a loss of 20 and 30 per cent of the normal crops in districts

which are not reckoned as falling within the famine tract. If to

this be added the value of several millions of cattle and other

live stock, some conception may be formed of the destruction

of property which that great drought occasioned. There have been

many great droughts in India, but there have been no others of

which such figures could have been predicated as these.

"But the most notable feature of the famine of 1900-01 was the

liberality of the public and the government. It has no parallel in

the history of the world. For weeks more than six million persons

were dependent upon the charity of the government. In 1897 the

high water mark of relief was reached in the second fortnight

of May, when there were nearly four million persons receiving

relief in British India. Taking the affected population as forty

millions, the ratio of relief was 10 per cent. In one district of

Madras and in two districts of the northwestern provinces the ratio

for some months was about 30 per cent, but these were exceptional

cases. In the most distressed districts of the central provinces

16 per cent was regarded in 1896-7 as a very high standard of

relief. Now take the figures of 1900-01. For some weeks upward

of four and a half million persons were receiving food from the

government in British India, and, reckoned on a population of

twenty-five millions, the ratio was 18 per cent, as compared

with 10 per cent of the population in 1897. In many districts

it exceeded 20 per cent. In several it exceeded 30 per cent.

In two districts it exceeded 40 per cent, and in the district

of Merwara, where famine had been present for two years, 75 per

cent of the population were dependent upon the government for

food. Nothing I could say can intensify the simple eloquence

of these figures.

"The first thing to be done was to relieve the immediate distress,

to feed the hungry, to rescue those who were dying of starvation.

The next step was to furnish employment at living wages for those

who were penniless until we could help them to get upon their

feet again, and finally to devise means and methods to meet such

emergencies in the future, because famines are the fate of India

and must continue to recur under existing conditions.

"I should like to tell you of the courage, endurance and the

devotion of the men who distributed the relief, many of whom

died at their posts of duty as bravely and as uncomplainingly

as they might have died upon the field of battle. The world will

never know the extent and the number of sacrifices made by British

and native officials. The government alone expended $32,000,000

for food, while the amount disbursed by the native states, by

religious and private charities, was very large. The contributions

from abroad were about $3,000,000, and the government loaned the

farmers more than $20,000,000 to buy seed and cattle and put

in new crops.

"So far as the official figures are concerned, the total cost

of the famine of 1900 was as follows:

BRITISH INDIA

Direct relief $31,950,000

Loss of revenue 16,200,000

Loans to farmers and native states 21,300,000

NATIVE STATES

Relief expenditure and loss of revenue 22,500,000

-----------

Total $91,950,000

"Some part of these loans and advances will eventually be repaid.

But it is not a new thing for the government of India to relieve

its people in times of distress. The frequent famines have been

an enormous drain upon the resources of the empire."

The following table shows the expenditures for famine relief

by the imperial government of India during the last twenty-one

years:

Five years, 1881-86 $25,573,885

Five years, 1886-91 11,449,190

Five years, 1891-96 21,631,900

1896-1897 8,550,705

1897-1898 19,053,575

1898-1899 5,000,000

1899-1900 10,642,235

1900-1901 20,829,335

1901-1902 5,000,000

------------

Total (twenty-one years) $127,730,825

Among the principal items chargeable to famine relief, direct and

indirect, are the wages paid dependent persons employed during

famines in the construction of railways and irrigation works,

which, during the last twenty-one years, have been as follows:

Direct Construction

famine Construction of irrigation

relief. of railways. works.

Five years, '81-'86 $379,760 $9,113,165 $3,739,790

1886-1891 277,030 666,665 1,384,570

1891-1896 411,065 12,056,505 921,675

1896-1897 6,931,750 156,100

1897-1898 17,752,025 125,055

1898-1899 133,515 2,301,175 38,900

1899-1900 10,375,590 119,650

1900-1901 20,626,150 155,570

1901-1902 2,645,905 353,465

----------- ----------- ----------

Total (21 years) $59,531,790 $24,137,610 $6,994,775

The chief remedies which the government has been endeavoring to

apply are:

1. To extend the cultivated area by building irrigation works and

scattering the people over territory that is not now occupied.

2. To construct railways and other transportation facilities

for the distribution of food. This work has been pushed with

great energy, and during the last ten years the railway mileage

has been increased nearly 50 per cent to a total of more than

26,000 miles. About 2,000 miles are now under construction and

approaching completion, and fresh projects will be taken up and

pushed so that food may be distributed throughout the empire as

rapidly as possible in time of emergency. Railway construction

has also been one of the chief methods of relief. During the

recent famine, and that of 1897, millions of coolies, who could

find no other employment, were engaged at living wages upon various

public works. This was considered better than giving them direct

relief, which was avoided as far as possible so that they should

not acquire the habit of depending upon charity. And as a part

of the permanent famine relief system for future emergencies,

the board of public works has laid out a scheme of roads and

the department of agriculture a system of irrigation upon which

the unemployed labor can be mobilized at short notice, and funds

have been set apart for the payment of their wages. This is one

of the most comprehensive schemes of charity ever conceived, and

must commend to every mind the wisdom, foresight and benevolence

of the Indian government, which, with the experience with a dozen

famines, has found that its greatest difficulty has been to relieve

the distressed and feed the hungry without making permanent paupers

of them. Every feature of famine relief nowadays involves the

employment of the needy and rejects the free distribution of

food.

3. The government is doing everything possible to encourage the

diversification of labor, to draw people from the farms and employ

them in other industries. This requires a great deal of time,

because it depends upon private enterprise, but during the last

ten years there has been a notable increase in the number of

mechanical industries and the number of people employed by them,

which it is believed will continue because of the profits that

have been realized by investors.

4. The government is also making special efforts to develop the

dormant resources of the empire. There has been a notable increase

in mining, lumbering, fishing, and other outside industries which

have not received the attention they deserved by the people of

India; and, finally,

5. The influence of the government has also been exerted so far

as could be to the encouragement of habits of thrift among the

people by the establishment of postal savings banks and other

inducements for wage-earners to save their money. Ninety per

cent of the population of India lives from hand to mouth and

depends for sustenance upon the crops raised upon little patches

of ground which in America would be too insignificant for

consideration. There is very seldom a surplus. The ordinary Hindu

never gets ahead, and, therefore, when his little crop fails he

is helpless.

[Illustration: A TEAM OF "CRITTERS"]

The munificence of Mr. Henry Phipps of New York has enabled the

government of India to provide one of the preventives of famine

by educating the people in agricultural science. A college, an

experimental farm and research laboratory have been established

on the government estate of Pusa, in southern Bengal, a tract

of 1,280 acres, which has been used since 1874 as a breeding

ranch, a tobacco experimental farm and a model dairy. No country

has needed such an institution more than India, where 80 per

cent of the population are engaged in agricultural pursuits,

and most of them with primitive implements and methods. But the

conservatism and the illiteracy, the prejudices and the ignorance

of the natives make it exceedingly difficult to introduce

innovations, and it is the conviction of those best qualified

to speak that the only way of improving the condition of the

farmer classes is to begin at the top and work down by the force

of example. During a recent visit to India this became apparent

to Mr. Phipps, who is eminently a practical man, and has been

in the habit of dealing with industrial questions all of his

life. He was brought up in the Carnegie iron mills, became a

superintendent, a manager and a partner, and, when the company

went into the great trust, retired from active participation in

its management with an immense fortune. He has built a beautiful

house in New York, has leased an estate in Scotland, where his

ancestors came from, and has been spending a vacation, earned

by forty years of hard labor, in traveling about the world. His

visit to India brought him into a friendly acquaintance with Lord

Curzon, in whom he found a congenial spirit, and doubtless the

viceroy received from the practical common sense of Mr. Phipps many

suggestions that will be valuable to him in the administration

of the government, and in the solution of the frequent problems

that perplex him. Mr. Phipps, on the other hand, had his sympathy

and interest excited in the industrial conditions of India, and

particularly in the famine phenomena. He therefore placed at the

disposal of Lord Curzon the sum of $100,000, to which he has

since added $50,000, to be devoted to whatever object of public

utility in the direction of scientific research the viceroy might

consider most useful and expedient. In accepting this generous

offer it appeared to His Excellency that no more practical or

useful object could be found to which to devote the gift, nor

one more entirely in harmony with the wishes of the donor, than

the establishment of a laboratory for agricultural research, and

Mr. Phipps has expressed his warm approval of the decision.

It is proposed to place the college upon a higher grade than

has ever been reached by any agricultural school in India, not

only to provide for a reform of the agricultural methods of the

country, but also to serve as a model for and to raise the standard

of the provincial schools, because at none of them are there

arrangements for a complete or competent agricultural education.

It is proposed to have a course of five years for the training

of teachers for other institutions and the specialists needed in

the various branches of science connected with the agricultural

department, who are now imported from Europe. The necessity for

such an education, Lord Curzon says, is constantly becoming more

and more imperative. The higher officials of the government have

long realized that there should be some institution in India

where they can train the men they require, if their scheme of

agricultural reformation is ever to be placed upon a practical

basis and made an actual success. For those who wish to qualify

for professorships or for research work, or for official positions

requiring special scientific attainments, it is believed that

a five years' course is none too long. But for young men who

desire only to train themselves for the management of their own

estates or the estates of others, a three years' course will be

provided, with practical work upon the farm and in the stable.

The government has solved successfully several of the irrigation

problems now under investigation by the Agricultural Department

and the Geological Survey of the United States. The most successful

public works of that nature are in the northern part of the empire.

The facilities for irrigation in India are quite as varied as in the

United States, the topography being similar and equally diverse.

In the north the water supply comes from the melting snows of the

Himalayas; in the east and west from the great river systems

of the Ganges and the Indus, while in the central and southern

portions the farmers are dependent upon tanks or reservoirs into

which the rainfall is drained and kept in store until needed.

In several sections the rainfall is so abundant as to afford

a supply of water for the tanks which surpluses in constancy

and volume that from any of the rivers. In Bombay and Madras

provinces almost all of the irrigation systems are dependent

upon this method. In the river provinces are many canals which

act as distributaries during the spring overflow, carry the water

a long distance and distribute it over a large area during the

periods of inundation. In several places the usefulness of these

canals has been increased by the construction of reservoirs which

receive and hold the floods upon the plan proposed for some of

our arid states.

In India the water supply is almost entirely controlled by the

government. There are some private enterprises, but most of them

are for the purpose of reaching land owned by the projectors.

A few companies sell water to the adjacent farmers on the same

plan as that prevailing in California, Colorado and other of

our states. But the government of India has demonstrated the

wisdom of national ownership and control, and derives a large

and regular revenue therefrom. In the classification adopted by

the department of public works the undertakings are designated

as "major" and "minor" classes. The "major" class includes all

extensive works which have been built by government money, and

are maintained under government supervision. Some of them, classed

as "famine protective works," were constructed with relief funds

during seasons of famine in order to furnish work and wages to

the unemployed, and at the same time provide a certain supply

of water for sections of the country exposed to drought. The

"minor" works are of less extent, and have been constructed from

time to time to assist private enterprise.

The financial history of the public irrigation works of India

will be particularly interesting to the people of the United

States because our government is just entering upon a similar

policy, the following statement is brought down to December 31,

1902:

Cost of construction $125,005,705

Receipts from water rates (1902) 7,797,890

Receipts from land taxes (1902) 4,066,985

Total revenue from all sources (1902) 11,864,875

Working expenses (1902) 3,509,600

Net revenue (1902) 8,355,275

Interest on capital invested 4,720,615

Net revenue, deducting interest 3,634,660

Profit on capital invested, per cent 6.97

Net profit to the government, per cent 3.04

In addition to this revenue from the "major" irrigation works

belonging to the government, the net receipts from "minor" works

during the year 1902 amounted to $864,360 in American money.

In other words, the government of India has invested about

$125,000,000 in reservoirs, canals, dams and ditches for the

purpose of securing regular crops for the farmers of that empire

who are exposed to drought, and not only has accomplished that

purpose, but, after deducting 3-1/2 per cent as interest upon

the amount named, enjoys a net profit of more than $3,500,000

after the payment of running expenses and repairs. These profits

are regularly expended in the extension of irrigation works.

In the Sinde province, which is the extreme western section of

India, adjoining the colony of Beluchistan on the Arabian Sea,

there are about 12,500,000 acres of land fit for cultivation. Of

this a little more than 9,000,000 acres are under cultivation,

irrigated with water from the Indus River, and the government

system reaches 3,077,466 acres. Up to December 31, 1902, it had

expended $8,830,000 in construction and repairs, and during that

year received a net revenue of 8.5 per cent upon that amount

over and above interest and running expenses.

In Madras 6,884,554 acres have peen irrigated by the government

works at a cost of $24,975,000. In 1902 they paid an average

net revenue of 9.5 per cent upon the investment, and the value

of the crops grown upon the irrigated land was $36,663,000.

In the united provinces of Agra and Oudh in northern India the

supply of water from the Himalayas is distributed through 12,919

miles of canals belonging to the government, constructed at a

cost of $28,625,000, which irrigates 2,741,460 acres. In 1902

the value of the crops harvested upon this land was $28,336,005,

and the government received a net return of 6.15 per cent upon

the investment. The revenue varies in different parts of the

provinces. One system known as the Eastern Jumna Canal, near

Lucknow, paid 23 per cent upon its cost in water rents during

that year. In other parts of the province, where the construction

was much more expensive, the receipts fell as low as 2.12 per

cent.

Modern India · 第 21 / 34 段