SLAVERY AND THE BLACK CODE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

REMARKS IN THE SENATE, ON A RESOLUTION FOR THE DISCHARGE OF FUGITIVE

SLAVES FROM THE WASHINGTON JAIL, DECEMBER 4, 1861.

December 4th, Mr. Wilson introduced a joint resolution for

the release of certain persons confined in the county jail

for the County of Washington in the District of Columbia,

which was read a first and second time. A debate ensued, in

which the jail and the judiciary of the District were severely

handled. Mr. Hale hoped that Mr. Wilson, who had introduced the

resolution, would “pursue his inquiries further, and find out

where the cause of all this evil is, and apply the remedy.” Mr.

Fessenden, after calling attention to the administration of

justice in the District and hoping for an inquiry, concluded:

“It is well, perhaps, that we should begin here; it is a

tangible point; but I hope it will be followed up to any extent

that may be necessary in order to accomplish the purpose.” Mr.

Sumner at once took advantage of the debate, and turned it

against Slavery and the Black Code.

MR. PRESIDENT,--The Senator from Maine [Mr. Fessenden] has pointed

to abuses of the judiciary in this District, and he insists that at

last we shall have decent men on the bench. But that is not going

far enough, Sir. Something more is needed. We must have decent laws.

A Black Code still prevails in this District, imported from the old

legislation of Maryland, which is a shame to the civilization of our

age. If any one wishes to know why such abuses exist in prisons and in

courts as have been so eloquently portrayed, I refer him to that Black

Code. There you will find apology for every outrage. If, therefore,

Senators are really in earnest, if they are determined that the

national capital shall be purified, that the administration of justice

here shall be worthy of a civilized community, they must expunge that

Black Code from the statute-book: but to do this is to expunge Slavery

itself; and here we are brought precisely to the point.

Senators mistake, if they treat this question merely on the outside.

They must penetrate its interior. Why is that prison so offensive as I

know it to be?--for it has been my fortune to visit it repeatedly. It

is on account of Slavery, with the Black Code, which is its offspring.

Why is justice so offensively administered in this District? It is on

account of those brutal sentiments generated by Slavery, and manifested

in the Black Code, which the courts here but enforce.

I listened with gratitude to my distinguished friend from New Hampshire

[Mr. HALE], when he reviewed this subject, and announced that he would

soon bring in a bill to remove the evil. He did not tell us what the

bill would be; but the Senator is apt to be thorough. I doubt not that

he understands the case; but I am sure, that, to meet it, he must deal

directly with Slavery, the fountain and origin of all the noisome

inhumanity exposed before us to-day.

This was the first open word against Slavery in the District

since the breaking out of the Rebellion.

The resolution of Mr. Wilson was referred to the Committee

on the District of Columbia. He followed at once by another

resolution, which was referred to the same committee, where,

among other things, the committee was “instructed to consider

the expediency of abolishing Slavery in the District, with

compensation to the loyal holders of slaves.”

December 16th, Mr. Wilson introduced a bill “for the release

of certain persons held to service or labor in the District

of Columbia,” which was afterwards referred to the Committee

on the District, who reported it with amendments February 14,

1862. The further part Mr. Sumner took on this question will

appear hereafter.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 07 (of 20) · 第 132 / 136 题