"From these considerations, sire, and in the execution of so holy an

ordinance, your parliaments, by their decrees, proportion their

punishments to the guilt of the offenders; and your parliament of Normandy

has never, until the present time, found that its practice was different

from that of other courts; for all the books which treat upon this matter

cite an infinite number of decrees condemning witches to be burnt, or

broken on the wheel, or to other punishments. The following are

examples:--In the time of Chilperic, as may be seen in Gregory of Tours,

b. vi. c. 35 of his _History of France_; all the decrees of the parliament

of Paris passed according to, and in conformity with, this ancient

jurisprudence of the kingdom, cited by Imbert, in his _Judicial Practice_;

all those cited by Monstrelet, in 1459, against the witches of Artois; the

decrees of the same parliament, of the 13th of October 1573, against Mary

Le Fief, native of Saumur; of the 21st of October 1596, against the Sieur

de Beaumont, who pleaded, in his defence, that he had only sought the aid

of the devil for the purpose of unbewitching the afflicted and of curing

diseases; of the 4th of July 1606, against Francis du Bose; of the 20th of

July 1582, against Abel de la Rue, native of Coulommiers; of the 2d of

October 1593, against Rousseau and his daughter; of 1608, against another

Rousseau and one Peley, for witchcraft and adoration of the devil at the

Sabbath, under the figure of a he-goat, as confessed by them; the decree

of 4th of February 1615, against Leclerc, who appealed from the sentence

of the parliament of Orleans, and who was condemned for having attended

the Sabbath, and confessed, as well as two of his accomplices, who died in

prison, that he had adored the devil, renounced his baptism and his faith

in God, danced the witches' dance, and offered up unholy sacrifices; the

decrees of the 6th of May 1616, against a man named Leger, on a similar

accusation; the pardon granted by Charles IX. to Trois Echelles, upon

condition of revealing his accomplices, but afterwards revoked for renewed

sorcery on his part; the decree of the parliament of Paris, cited by

Mornac in 1595; the judgments passed in consequence of the commission

given by Henry IV. to the Sieur de l'Ancre, councillor of the parliament

of Bourdeaux; of the 20th of March 1619, against Etienne Audibert; those

passed by the chamber of Nerac, on the 26th of June 1620, against several

witches; those passed by the parliament of Toulouse in 1577, as cited by

Gregory Tolosanus, against four hundred persons accused of this crime, and

who were all marked with the sign of the devil. Besides all these, we

might recal to your majesty's recollection the various decrees of the

parliament of Provence, especially in the case of Gaufrédy in 1611; the

decrees of the parliament of Dijon, and those of the parliament of Rennes,

following the example of the condemnation of the Marshal de Rays, who was

burned in 1441, for the crime of witchcraft, in presence of the Duke of

Brittany;--all these examples, sire, prove that the accusation of

witchcraft has always been punished with death by the parliaments of your

kingdom, and justify the uniformity of their practice.

"These, sire, are the motives upon which your parliament of Normandy has

acted in decreeing the punishment of death against the persons lately

brought before it for this crime. If it has happened that, on any

occasion, these parliaments, and the parliament of Normandy among the

rest, have condemned the guilty to a less punishment than that of death,

it was for the reason that their guilt was not of the deepest dye; your

majesty, and the kings your predecessors, having left full liberty to the

various tribunals to whom they delegated the administration of justice, to

decree such punishment as was warranted by the evidence brought before

them.

"After so many authorities, and punishments ordained by human and divine

laws, we humbly supplicate your majesty to reflect once more upon the

extraordinary results which proceed from the malevolence of this sort of

people; on the deaths from unknown diseases, which are often the

consequences of their menaces, on the loss of the goods and chattels of

your subjects, on the proofs of guilt continually afforded by the

insensibility of the marks upon the accused, on the sudden transportation

of bodies from one place to another, on the sacrifices and nocturnal

assemblies, and other facts, corroborated by the testimony of ancient and

modern authors, and verified by so many eye-witnesses, composed partly of

accomplices, and partly of people who had no interest in the trials beyond

the love of truth, and confirmed, moreover, by the confessions of the

accused parties themselves; and that, sire, with so much agreement and

conformity between the different cases, that the most ignorant persons

convicted of this crime have spoken to the same circumstances, and in

nearly the same words, as the most celebrated authors who have written

about it, all of which may be easily proved to your majesty's satisfaction

by the records of various trials before your parliaments.

"These, sire, are truths so intimately bound up with the principles of our

religion, that, extraordinary although they be, no person has been able to

this time to call them in question. If some have cited, in opposition to

these truths, the pretended canon of the Council of Ancyre, and a passage

from St. Augustin, in a treatise upon the _Spirit and the Soul_, it has

been without foundation; and it would be easy to convince your majesty

that neither the one nor the other ought to be accounted of any authority;

and, besides that, the canon, in this sense, would be contrary to the

opinion of all succeeding councils of the Church, Cardinal Baronius, and

all learned commentators agree that it is not to be found in any old

edition. In effect, in those editions wherein it is found, it is in

another language, and is in direct contradiction to the twenty-third canon

of the same council, which condemns sorcery, according to all preceding

constitutions. Even supposing that this canon was really promulgated by

the Council of Ancyre, we must observe that it was issued in the second

century, when the principal attention of the Church was directed to the

destruction of paganism. For this reason, it condemns that class of women

who said they could pass through the air, and over immense regions, with

Diana and Herodias, and enjoins all preachers to teach the falsehood of

such an opinion, in order to deter people from the worship of these false

divinities; but it does not question the power of the devil over the human

body, which is, in fact, proved by the holy Gospel of Jesus Christ

himself. And with regard, sire, to the pretended passage of St. Augustin,

everybody knows that it was not written by him, because the writer,

whoever he was, cites Boetius, who died more than eighty years after the

time of St. Augustin. Besides, there is still more convincing proof in the

fact, that the same father establishes the truth of witchcraft in all his

writings, and more particularly in his _City of God_; and in his first

volume, question the 25th, wherein he states that sorcery is a communion

between man and the devil, which all good Christians ought to look upon

with horror.

"Taking all these things into consideration, sire, the officers of your

parliament hope, from the justice of your majesty, that you will be

graciously pleased to receive the humble remonstrances they have taken the

liberty to make. They are compelled, for the acquittal of their own

consciences and in discharge of their duty, to make known to your majesty,

that the decrees they passed against the sorcerers and witches brought

before them, were passed after a mature deliberation on the part of all

the judges present, and that nothing has been done therein which is not

conformable to the universal jurisprudence of the kingdom, and for the

general welfare of your majesty's subjects, of whom there is not one who

can say that he is secure from the malevolence of such criminals. We

therefore supplicate your majesty to suffer us to carry into effect the

sentences we passed, and to proceed with the trial of the other persons

accused of the same crime; and that the piety of your majesty will not

suffer to be introduced during your reign an opinion contrary to the

principles of that holy religion for which you have always employed so

gloriously both your cares and your arms."

Louis, as we have already mentioned, paid no attention to this appeal. The

lives of the old women were spared, and prosecutions for mere witchcraft,

unconnected with other offences, were discontinued throughout France. In

1680 an act was passed for the punishment, not of witches, but of

pretenders to witchcraft, fortune-tellers, divineresses, and poisoners.

Thus the light broke in upon Germany, France, England, and Scotland about

the same time, gradually growing clearer and clearer till the middle of

the eighteenth century, when witchcraft was finally reckoned amongst

exploded doctrines, and the belief in it confined to the uttermost vulgar.

Twice, however, did the madness burst forth again as furious, while it

lasted, as ever it had been. The first time in Sweden, in 1669, and the

second in Germany so late as 1749. Both these instances merit particular

mention. The first is one of the most extraordinary upon record, and for

atrocity and absurdity is unsurpassed in the annals of any nation.

It having been reported to the king of Sweden that the little village of

Mohra, in the province of Dalecarlia, was troubled exceedingly with

witches, he appointed a commission of clergy and laymen to trace the

rumour to its source, with full powers to punish the guilty. On the 12th

of August 1669, the commissioners arrived in the bewitched village, to the

great joy of the credulous inhabitants. On the following day the whole

population, amounting to three thousand persons, assembled in the church.

A sermon was preached, "declaring the miserable case of those people that

suffered themselves to be deluded by the devil," and fervent prayer was

offered up that God would remove the scourge from among them.

[Illustration: LOUIS XIV.]

The whole assembly then adjourned to the rector's house, filling all the

street before it, when the king's commission was read, charging every

person who knew any thing of the witchery, to come forward and declare the

truth. A passion of tears seized upon the multitude; men, women, and

children began to weep and sob, and all promised to divulge what they had

heard or knew. In this frame of mind they were dismissed to their homes.

On the following day they were again called together, when the depositions

of several persons were taken publicly before them all. The result was

that seventy persons, including fifteen children, were taken into custody.

Numbers also were arrested in the neighbouring district of Elfdale. Being

put to the torture, they all confessed their guilt. They said they used to

go to a gravel-pit, that lay hard by the cross-way, where they put a vest

upon their heads, and danced "round and round and round about." They then

went to the cross-way, and called three times upon the devil; the first

time in a low still voice; the second, somewhat louder; and the third,

very loudly, with these words, "Antecessor, come, and carry us to

Blockula!" This invocation never failed to bring him to their view. He

generally appeared as a little old man, in a grey coat, with red and blue

stockings, with exceedingly long garters. He had besides a very

high-crowned hat, with bands of many-coloured linen enfolded about it, and

a long red beard that hung down to his middle.

The first question he put to them was, whether they would serve him soul

and body? On their answering in the affirmative, he told them to make

ready for the journey to Blockula. It was necessary to procure, in the

first place, "some scrapings of altars and filings of church clocks."

Antecessor then gave them a horn with some salve in it, wherewith they

anointed themselves. These preparations ended, he brought beasts for them

to ride upon,--horses, asses, goats, and monkeys; and giving them a

saddle, a hammer, and a nail, uttered the word of command, and away they

went. Nothing stopped them. They flew over churches, high walls, rocks,

and mountains, until they came to the green meadow where Blockula was

situated. Upon these occasions they carried as many children with them as

they could; for the devil, they said, "did plague and whip them if they

did not procure him children, insomuch that they had no peace or quiet for

him."

Many parents corroborated a part of this evidence, stating that their

children had repeatedly told them that they had been carried away in the

night to Blockula, where the devil had beaten them black and blue. They

had seen the marks in the morning, but they soon disappeared. One little

girl was examined, who swore positively that she was carried through the

air by the witches, and when at a great height she uttered the holy name

of Jesus. She immediately fell to the ground, and made a great hole in her

side. "The devil, however, picked her up, healed her side, and carried her

away to Blockula." She added (and her mother confirmed her statement),

that she had till that day "an exceeding great pain in her side." This was

a clencher, and the nail of conviction was driven home to the hearts of

the judges.

The place called Blockula, whither they were carried, was a large house,

with a gate to it, "in a delicate meadow, whereof they could see no end."

There was a very long table in it, at which the witches sat down; and in

other rooms "there were very lovely and delicate beds for them to sleep

upon."

After a number of ceremonies had been performed, by which they bound

themselves body and soul to the service of Antecessor, they sat down to a

feast composed of broth, made of colworts and bacon, oatmeal, bread and

butter, milk and cheese. The devil always took the chair, and sometimes

played to them on the harp or the fiddle while they were eating. After

dinner they danced in a ring, sometimes naked, and sometimes in their

clothes, cursing and swearing all the time. Some of the women added

particulars too horrible and too obscene for repetition.

Once the devil pretended to be dead, that he might see whether his people

regretted him. They instantly set up a loud wail, and wept three tears

each for him; at which he was so pleased, that he jumped up among them,

and hugged in his arms those who had been most obstreperous in their

sorrow.

Such were the principal details given by the children, and corroborated by

the confessions of the full-grown witches. Any thing more absurd was never

before stated in a court of justice. Many of the accused contradicted

themselves most palpably; but the commissioners gave no heed to

discrepancies. One of them, the parson of the district, stated in the

course of the inquiry, that on a particular night, which he mentioned, he

had been afflicted with a headache so agonising, that he could not account

for it otherwise than by supposing he was bewitched. In fact, he thought a

score of witches must have been dancing on the crown of his head. This

announcement excited great horror among the pious dames of the auditory,

who loudly expressed their wonder that the devil should have power to hurt

so good a man. One poor witch, who lay in the very jaws of death,

confessed that she knew too well the cause of the minister's headache. The

devil had sent her with a sledge hammer and a large nail to drive into the

good man's skull. She had hammered at it for some time, but the skull was

so enormously _thick_, that she made no impression upon it. Every hand was

held up in astonishment. The pious minister blessed God that his skull was

so solid, and he became renowned for his thick head all the days of his

life. Whether the witch intended a joke does not appear, but she was

looked upon as a criminal more than usually atrocious. Seventy persons

were condemned to death on these so awful, yet so ridiculous confessions.

Twenty-three of them were burned together in one fire in the village of

Mohra, in the presence of thousands of delighted spectators. On the

following day fifteen children were murdered in the same manner, offered

up in sacrifice to the bloody Moloch of superstition. The remaining

thirty-two were executed at the neighbouring town of Fahluna. Besides

these, fifty-six children were found guilty of witchcraft in a minor

degree, and sentenced to various punishments, such as running the

gauntlet, imprisonment, and public whipping once a week for a twelvemonth.

Long after the occurrence of this case, it was cited as one of the most

convincing proofs upon record of the prevalence of witchcraft. When men

wish to construct or support a theory, how they torture facts into their

service! The lying whimsies of a few sick children, encouraged by foolish

parents, and drawn out by superstitious neighbours, were sufficient to set

a country in a flame. If, instead of commissioners as deeply sunk in the

slough of ignorance as the people they were sent amongst, there had been

deputed a few men firm in courage and clear in understanding, how

different would have been the result! Some of the poor children who were

burned would have been sent to an infirmary; others would have been well

flogged; the credulity of the parents would have been laughed at; and the

lives of seventy persons spared. The belief in witchcraft remains in

Sweden to this day; but happily the annals of that country present no more

such instances of lamentable aberration of intellect as the one just

cited.

In New England, about the same time, the colonists were scared by similar

stories of the antics of the devil. All at once a fear seized upon the

multitude, and supposed criminals were arrested day after day in such

numbers, that the prisons were found too small to contain them. A girl

named Goodwin, the daughter of a mason, who was hypochondriac and subject

to fits, imagined that an old Irish woman, named Glover, had bewitched

her. Her two brothers, in whose constitutions there was apparently a

predisposition to similar fits, went off in the same way, crying out that

the devil and Dame Glover were tormenting them. At times their joints were

so stiff that they could not be moved; while at others, said the

neighbours, they were so flexible, that the bones appeared softened into

sinews. The supposed witch was seized, and as she could not repeat the

Lord's Prayer without making a mistake in it, she was condemned and

executed.

But the popular excitement was not allayed. One victim was not enough; the

people waited agape for new disclosures. Suddenly two hysteric girls in

another family fell into fits daily, and the cry of witchcraft resounded

from one end of the colony to the other. The feeling of suffocation in the

throat, so common in cases of hysteria, was said by the patients to be

caused by the devil himself, who had stuck balls in the windpipe to choke

them. They felt the pricking of thorns in every part of the body, and one

of them vomited needles. The case of these girls, who were the daughter

and niece of a Mr. Parvis, the minister of a Calvinist chapel, excited so

much attention, that all the weak women in the colony began to fancy

themselves similarly afflicted. The more they brooded on it, the more

convinced they became. The contagion of this mental disease was as great

as if it had been a pestilence. One after the other the women fainted

away, asserting on their recovery that they had seen the spectres of

witches. Where there were three or four girls in a family, they so worked

each upon the diseased imagination of the other, that they fell into fits

five or six times in a day. Some related that the devil himself appeared

to them, bearing in his hand a parchment-roll, and promising that if they

would sign an agreement, transferring to him their immortal souls, they

should be immediately relieved from fits and all the ills of the flesh.

Others asserted that they saw witches only, who made them similar

promises, threatening that they should never be free from aches and pains

till they had agreed to become the devil's. When they refused, the witches

pinched, or bit, or pricked them with long pins and needles. More than two

hundred persons named by these mischievous visionaries were thrown into

prison. They were of all ages and conditions of life, and many of them of

exemplary character. No less than nineteen were condemned and executed

before reason returned to the minds of the colonists. The most horrible

part of this lamentable history is, that among the victims there was a

little child only five years old. Some women swore that they had seen it

repeatedly in company with the devil, and that it had bitten them often

with its little teeth for refusing to sign a compact with the evil one. It

can hardly increase our feelings of disgust and abhorrence when we learn

that this insane community actually tried and executed a dog for the same

offence!

One man, named Cory, stoutly refused to plead to the preposterous

indictment against him. As was the practice in such cases, he was pressed

to death. It is told of the Sheriff of New England, who superintended the

execution, that when this unhappy man thrust out his tongue in his mortal

agony, he seized hold of a cane, and crammed it back again into the mouth.

If ever there were a fiend in human form, it was this sheriff: a man who,

if the truth were known, perhaps plumed himself upon his piety--thought he

was doing God good service, and

"Hoped to merit heaven by making earth a hell!"

Arguing still in the firm belief of witchcraft, the bereaved people began

to inquire, when they saw their dearest friends snatched away from them by

these wide-spreading accusations, whether the whole proceedings were not

carried on by the agency of the devil. Might not the great enemy have put

false testimony into the mouths of the witnesses, or might not the

witnesses be witches themselves? Every man who was in danger of losing his

wife, his child, or his sister, embraced this doctrine with avidity. The

revulsion was as sudden as the first frenzy. All at once, the colonists

were convinced of their error. The judges put a stop to the prosecutions,

even of those who had confessed their guilt. The latter were no sooner at

liberty than they retracted all they had said, and the greater number

hardly remembered the avowals which agony had extorted from them. Eight

persons, who had been tried and condemned, were set free; and gradually

girls ceased to have fits and to talk of the persecutions of the devil.

The judge who had condemned the first criminal executed on this charge,

was so smitten with sorrow and humiliation at his folly, that he set apart

the anniversary of that day as one of solemn penitence and fasting. He

still clung to the belief in witchcraft; no new light had broken in upon

him on that subject, but, happily for the community, the delusion had

taken a merciful turn. The whole colony shared the feeling; the jurors on

the different trials openly expressed their penitence in the churches; and

those who had suffered were regarded as the victims, and not as the

accomplices of Satan.

It is related that the Indian tribes in New England were sorely puzzled at

the infatuation of the settlers, and thought them either a race inferior

to, or more sinful than the French colonists in the vicinity, amongst

whom, as they remarked, "the Great Spirit sent no witches."

Returning again to the continent of Europe, we find that, after the year

1680, men became still wiser upon this subject. For twenty years the

populace were left to their belief, but governments in general gave it no

aliment in the shape of executions. The edict of Louis XIV. gave a blow to

the superstition, from which it never recovered. The last execution in the

Protestant cantons of Switzerland was at Geneva, in 1652. The various

potentates of Germany, although they could not stay the trials, invariably

commuted the sentence into imprisonment, in all cases where the pretended

witch was accused of pure witchcraft, unconnected with any other crime. In

the year 1701, Thomasius, the learned professor at the University of

Halle, delivered his inaugural thesis, _De Crimine Magiæ_ which struck

another blow at the falling monster of popular error. But a faith so

strong as that in witchcraft was not to be eradicated at once: the

arguments of learned men did not penetrate to the villages and hamlets;

but still they achieved great things; they rendered the belief an

unworking faith, and prevented the supply of victims, on which for so many

ages it had battened and grown strong.

Once more the delusion broke out; like a wild beast wounded to the death,

it collected all its remaining energies for the final convulsion, which

was to shew how mighty it had once been. Germany, which had nursed the

frightful error in its cradle, tended it on its death-bed, and Würzburg,

the scene of so many murders on the same pretext, was destined to be the

scene of the last. That it might lose no portion of its bad renown, the

last murder was as atrocious as the first. This case offers a great

resemblance to that of the witches of Mohra and New England, except in the

number of its victims. It happened so late as the year 1749, to the

astonishment and disgust of the rest of Europe.

[Illustration: VIEW IN WÜRZBURG.]

Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds · 第 50 / 66 段