CHAPTER XXV. "DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL."

THE gradual decline of the German festival and "spektakel" operas was

consummated in 1742, when Gottsched,

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(216)

who had waged incessant war against them throughout his career, had the

satisfaction of chronicling the opera of "Atalanta," in Dresden, as the

last of its kind[1] but they were succeeded by a sort of aftergrowth

in the form of the operetta.[2] The theatrical managers could not

altogether dispense with similar means of attraction, and attempts were

made to introduce the musical intermezzo, together with the now fairly

well-established ballet. In 1743 Schonemann produced in Berlin Coffey's

"Devil to Pay" ("Der Teufel ist los"), adapted by Von Barck, with the

English melodies;[3] but this attempt, as well as the performance of

Schürer's vaudeville "Doris," in Dresden, in 1747,[4] remained

without result. In 1752 Koch, of Leipzig, who had had recourse to the

performance of Italian intermezzi,[5] commissioned Chr. Fel. Weisse

to make a new adaptation of Coffey's "Devil to Pay, or the Bewitched

Wives," which was set to music by Standfuss, the assistant-manager of

Koch's company.[6] Gottsched and his wife renewed the old strife against

this attempt, but were completely defeated.[7] The second part of the

opera "Der Teufel ist los"--"Der Lustige Schuster"--was produced by

Koch, in 1759, at Lubeck.[8] But not until his return to

{GERMAN OPERETTA.}

(217)

Leipzig, in 1765, did he give his serious attention to vaudeville.

Weisse revised his old opera of "Der Teufel ist los," which, with

partially new music by Hiller, was performed in 1766, and received

with fresh applause.[9] Koch found in Joh. Ad. Hiller what had always

hitherto been wanting, viz., a composer of good musical and general

education, having a decided talent for light, easy, and characteristic

music (more especially comic music), and full of zeal for the elevation

of the national art. He endeavoured to make another step in advance,

and by the composition of Schieb-ler's romantic poem of "Lisuart and

Dariolette" (performed November 25, 1766) to lay the foundation of

serious German opera.[10] Educated in the tradition of Hasse and Graun,

with the additional influence of Ph. Em. Bach, he followed with interest

the attempts to gain favour for Italian music in Paris by reconciling it

with the demands of French taste; and he wished to establish a national

German opera on the same principles. He denied that the German language

was unfitted for song, if only the poet would take the trouble of

accommodating it to the music, and if artists were trained for German

singing with as much care as for Italian. Since German taste was more

Italian than French, but the French were superior to the Italians in

dramatic treatment, a French plan in Italian form was most likely to be

approved of by Germans.[11] The insufficient appointments of the Leipzig

stage must, however, have dissuaded him from any idea of a grand opera.

To this was added his connection with Weisse, who during his residence

in Paris had taken a lively interest in the comic opera, and had exerted

himself to transplant it into Germany.[12]

His first opera, "Lottchen am Hofe," after "Ninette ä la Cour," and "Die

Liebe auf dem Lande," after "Annette et

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(218)

Lubin" and "La Clochette," had so great a success in 1767 and 1768

that they prepared the way for other similar attempts.[13] These simple

dramas, which occupied the mind without exerting it, and moved the

feelings without unduly exciting them, were so much in keeping with

Weisse's own nature that he was able to give them characteristic and

appropriate form. They opened a field, too, for Hiller's simple hearty

spirit, embodied in a popular form, which made his style appeal at once

to the multitude; while an endeavour after higher things would only have

turned him into an imitator of Hasse. A rapid succession of operas by

Weisse and Hiller, which were received with unanimous approbation, and

spread with incredible rapidity, soon established a definite type of

German operetta, and raised up a host of imitators. The interest of the

public, especially in North Germany, was almost exclusively confined to

operetta,[14] so that in Berlin, for instance, during the years

1781-83, 117, 141, and 151 operettas were performed.[15] This implies an

extraordinary production. Besides translations from French operettas

by Duni, Philidor, Monsigny, Grétry, and Italian intermezzi, there

were innumerable German vaudevilles, for the most part also founded on

foreign originals.[16] Some idea may be formed of the fertility of these

composers, by the fact that between 1765 and 1785, Hiller composed 13

operas, Wolf 18, Neefe 10, Holly 13, André 22, Schweitzer 16, Stegmann

10, G. Benda 8; to whom may be added a host of other less productive and

less celebrated composers.

This activity had indeed drawbacks, for it was practised with great

ease, and many amateurs of very inferior musical education intruded

themselves among the operatic musicians.[17] The careless dilettantism

of the poet went hand in hand

{GERMAN OPERETTA.}

(219)

with that of the composer. A host of unskilful verse-makers allied

themselves with Weisse, Michaelis, and Gotter, and threatened to degrade

the operetta to the lower level of the opera buffa. A further drawback

consisted in the very defective performances, which in most instances

resulted from the insufficient powers of the operetta companies.

"We must remember," says Reichardt, in his "History of the Comic Opera,"

"how much Hiller was hampered by the miserable state of our operatic

companies. He was fully aware of this, and what I admire in him is that

he never lost sight of the fact that he was writing, not for singers,

but for actors, who had scarcely music enough in them to sing over their

wine." The state of things had not altered much since Hiller began to

write. The Italian operas alone were supported by the courts; the German

operettas remained in the hands of private speculators; who did not

possess the means of attracting vocalists of artistic cultivation.

No singer of any reputation would have thought it consistent with his

dignity to appear in German vaudeville. The vaudeville, therefore,

remained in the hands of actors, who had seldom any vocal powers and

still seldomer any but a superficial cultivation, but who willingly

appeared in operettas on account of the high fees[18] and great applause

they might reckon upon. Reichardt gives an appalling description of the

German opera in Berlin in 1774; he heard one of Hiller's operas "sung

by a wide-mouthed, screeching woman, and a lover with a voice like a

night-watchman," and that before an audience which had "the reputation

of very refined taste";[19] he was no better pleased at Leipzig.[20]

Müller says of a performance of Wolf's "Treuen Kohler" at Dresden in

1776: "As only two of all the performers were at all musical, you may

imagine how the opera was

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(220)

rendered." It is conceivable, therefore, that the growing partiality for

German opera was regarded with disfavour by earnest men, as prejudicial

alike to the dramatic interests which were still struggling to assert

themselves in Germany,[21] and to the artistic development of operatic

music proper.[22] The actor Müller, during his professional tour in

1776, made himself acquainted with the views of competent judges as to

the admissibility of German operettas; the different opinions which

he collected are characteristic enough. Lessing--who held the union

of poetry and music as the most perfect in existence, "so that nature

herself appears to have destined them not so much for union as to be

considered as one and the same art"[23]--was against vaudevilles. "They

are the ruin of our stage. Such works are easily written; every comedy

affords material to the author; he scatters a few songs about, and the

thing is done. Our new dramatic poets find this a far easier task than

writing a good character piece." Gleim was even more violently

opposed to vaudeville than Lessing, and gave Müller an epigram upon

the

"Witch":--

Die, schlau wie

Schlang' und Krokodill,

Sich schleicht in aller

Menschen Herzen

Und drinnen sitzt, als wie ein

Huhn Auf seinem

Nest, und lehrt:

Nur klcine Thaten thun

Und über grosse

Thaten scherzen!"

Weisse smiled when Müller repeated the lines to him, and declared

himself, as became the founder of German opera, in its favour. He was

too modest, however, to maintain that operettas were dramatic works of

art, or to hope thereby to raise the taste of his countrymen; he could

only disclaim all intention of degrading it or of doing more than

encouraging

{GERMAN OPERETTA.}

(221)

German people to come together, and providing pleasant and popular

entertainments for them when they did so.[24] Gotter preserved a

discreet neutrality on the subject, since he had had a direct interest

in more than one operatic libretto; he would not declare for either

side, and was of opinion that variety was the root of all pleasure.

Wieland was more explicit, and declared that the national stage could

only be rendered of importance by German music; comic and serious German

vaudevilles were wanted, but good poets would soon come forward to

supply the need. He was not only able to point to his own "Alceste,"

and the success it had obtained; he had developed his views on the

cultivation of German vaudeville with a lively acknowledgment of

the achievements of Schweitzer, and he possessed genuine feeling and

interest for music. Even a musician like Reichardt declared himself

against the operetta, but thought as it was there it ought at least to

be improved, and made as useful as possible.[25]

The interest which was taken by great poets in the elevation of the

vaudeville is exemplified by Goethe; after "Erwin und Elmire" and

"Claudina von Villabella" were written, his intercourse with his

early friend Christoph Kayser[26] (b. 1736) caused him to attempt

the construction of vaudeville after the received type of the Italian

operetta. His first experiment was "Scherz, List und Rache," which he

began in 1784, and sent at once to Kayser for composition;[27] the two

first acts were ready the following year, and were well thought of in

Weimar;[28] in Rome, whither Goethe was followed by Kayser at the end of

1787, they finished the operetta together.[29] But Goethe thought that

the operetta

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(222)

was extravagantly mounted,[30] and complains himself that a defective

conception of the intermezzo had led him to spin out the trivial subject

into innumerable musical pieces, which had been treated by Kayser quite

after the old-fashioned models. "Unhappily," says Goethe, "adherence to

the old principles caused it to suffer from poverty of parts; it never

went beyond a terzet, and one felt inclined to wish that the doctor's

medical books might be endowed with life to form a chorus. All the pains

we took, therefore, to confine ourselves within narrow and simple limits

went for nothing when Mozart appeared. The 'Entführung aus dem Serail'

threw all else into the shade, and our carefully worked-out piece was

never heard of again at any theatre."[31]

A closer examination of Mozart's opera will make it clear to us why it

threw all others into the shade. The plot of Bretzner's[32] "Entführung

aus dem Serail," written for André in 1781, is simple and in no way

original:--

Constanze, the beloved of Belmont, is in the power of the Pasha Selim,

who has confined her in his seraglio, and sues in vain for her love.

Belmont has been made aware of her place of confinement by Pedrillo,

his former servant, who has also fallen into the hands of the Pasha,

and become the overseer of his gardens; Belmont hastens to liberate his

beloved. In seeking Pedrillo he stumbles upon Osmin, overseer of the

country-house in which the action takes place; and both he and Pedrillo

(who is even more obnoxious to Osmin from his known love to Blondchen,

Constanze's waiting-maid, whom Osmin seeks to win) are rudely repulsed

by Osmin. In the meantime Pedrillo succeeds in recommending Belmont

to his master as an accomplished architect; Selim takes him into

his service, and Osmin is reluctantly obliged to admit him to the

country-house. In the second act Blondchen makes short work of Osmin's

arrogant jealousy in respect of her, and Constanze remains constant

against the renewed attempts of the Pasha. Hereupon Pedrillo inveigles

Osmin into drinking with him, and renders him harmless by means of a

sleeping potion; the freedom thus obtained is employed by the lovers in

an interview at which their flight the following night is determined on.

In the third act this is put into effect. Pedrillo

{ALTERATIONS IN THE LIBRETTO.}

(223)

gives the sign, Belmont escapes with Constanze; as Pedrillois carrying

off Blondchen, Osmin enters still half asleep; they contrive to escape

but he causes them to be pursued, and both couples are brought before

the Pasha. They are condemned to death, but the Pasha, moved at last by

their self-sacrificing love and fidelity, pardons and unites them.

The original libretto is arranged for a genuine vaudeville. All the

dramatic interest lies in the spoken dialogue; the songs are, with a few

exceptions, superfluous additions, and imply a very moderate amount of

execution. Mozart undertook to indicate to Stephanie where and how, in

the interests of the composer, alterations should be made, and only left

to him the framing of the text, with which it was not necessary to be

so particular, if only the situations were well arranged in their main

features. The principal point, next to giving to the musical element

of the piece its due prominence as the most fitting expression of lyric

sentiment, was the proper consideration of the individualities of the

performers themselves. Fortunately this task was not complicated in the

way which had so often been the case. Madame Cavalieri was certainly

more of a bravura singer than anything else, and neither her appearance

nor her acting was effective; but Adamberger and Fischer were just as

Mozart would have had them, both as singers and actors, and Fischer

especially was an extraordinarily gifted artist. The part of Osmin,

which was created for him, shows the influence of a congenial spirit on

the conceptions of the creating artist. When Mozart was fairly

embarked in the work, he wrote to his father about the libretto and the

alterations already made in it (September 26, 1781):--

The opera began with a soliloquy which I have begged Herr Stephanie

to turn into a little ariette, and also, instead of the two chattering

together after Osmin's song, to make a duet out of the dialogue. As

we have given the part to Fischer, who has an excellent bass voice

(although the Archbishop once told me he sang too low for a bass, and I

assured his grace that he would sing higher next time), we must give him

something to do, especially as he is such a favourite with the public.

In the original book Osmin has only one little song, and nothing else

but the terzet and finale. I have given him an aria in the first

act, and he is to have another in the second. I have trusted the aria

altogether to Stephanie, the music was ready before he knew a word about

it.

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(224)

These alterations were of specially good dramatic effect in the first

scene, and Osmin's song called to life the first German comic aria which

deserves to be called great. In the second act the dialogue between

Blondchen and Osmin becomes a duet; on the other hand, a superfluous

duet between Constanze and Blondchen is very rightly omitted. Instead of

it Constanze has the great bravura song "Mar-tem aller Arten," chiefly

as a concession to the singer; for the repetition of the scene in

which she scornfully rejects the Sultan's proposals is in every way

superfluous. Blondchen's second song--newly inserted--is, however, quite

appropriate; in it she expresses her joy at her approaching deliverance;

so that the original duet is really embodied to a certain extent in

these two songs.

But the chief alteration which Mozart contemplated was in the conclusion

of the second act. In Bretzner's text the abduction scene is treated as

a grand ensemble movement, with which the third act commences. A long

and elaborate duet between Belmont and Pedrillo, who are lying in

ambush, makes the beginning, and then Constanze appears and is carried

off by Belmont. After Pedrillo has climbed up to Blondchen in the

window, Osmin comes out of the house still heavy with sleep; but he sees

the fugitives and has them pursued and brought back by his guard; they

beg for mercy, seek to regain their liberty by bribery--in vain; Osmin

rages, and all the characters are in a state of excitement.

Mozart's quick eye saw that this scene, bringing together all

the characters in a succession of rapidly varying and contrasting

situations, forms the culminating point of the opera; he wished,

therefore, that this "charming quintet, or rather finale, should

be placed at the close of the second act." He also saw that this

transposition would necessitate other important alterations. The second

act could be kept together very well by the mutual understanding of the

two lovers; but the third act, for which nothing was reserved but the

unravelling of the knot by the clemency of the Sultan, if it was to

have any substance or interest, "must be provided with an entirely new

intrigue." The difficulty

{ALTERATIONS IN THE LIBRETTO.}

(225)

of finding this seems to have put a stop to the alteration, and the

original arrangement remained. But for Bretzner's insignificant finale

to the second act there was substituted an elaborate quartet, which

expresses in music the reunion of the lovers in its various aspects of

joy and jealousy, of disputes and reconciliation. An air for Belmont

precedes this; it is well-fitted for the situation, and is intended

also as a concession to the singer, for in this act, where all the other

characters come to the front, Belmont had originally nothing to sing but

the ensemble music.

Mozart began the composition of the ensemble movement at the

commencement of the third act. The greater part of the duet between

Belmont and Pedrillo before the romanze was sketched out by him in

his usual way, the voices and bass written in full, the accompaniment

indicated here and there. It breaks off, however, in the middle; and

Mozart appears to have purposely laid it aside, convinced that the scene

must be differently treated.[33] The ensemble was given up; Mozart saw

that it would throw the whole opera out of gear, and would concentrate

the interest and the action at the wrong place. The abduction scene was

confined to dialogue, only Pedrillo's romanze being left; in addition,

songs for Belmont and Osmin were inserted, both highly characteristic.

The duet for Belmont and Constanze, which follows, is altered only in

the words, not in the situation; the closing catastrophe it was

thought well to modify. In Bretzner's version the Pasha Selim, who is

a renegade, recognises in Belmont his son, which leads to the

_dénouement_;

but Stephanie makes him pardon the lovers from generosity and

magnanimity, which, as a critic remarked, were the fashion of the day in

Vienna.[34] Constanze's song of gratitude at the close is very rightly

omitted, and replaced by the then customary vaudeville, in which all the

characters declare in turn: "Wer solche Huld vergessen kann, den seh man

mit Verachtung an!

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(226)

Mozart's father had raised objections to the libretto, and the

alterations in it; he was particularly concerned that the verses

were not in regular rhyme throughout. Thereupon his son made him the

following remarkable answer (October):--

Now about the text of the opera. As far as Stephanie's work is

concerned, you are quite right, but the poetry is very well suited to

the character of the stupid, boorish, and malicious Osmin. I am quite

aware that the versification is not of the best; but it goes so well

with my musical thoughts (which were running in my head long before)

that I cannot but be pleased; and I would wager that no fault will be

found in performance. Belmont's aria, "O wie ängtslich," could scarcely

be written better for the music. Constanze's aria too is not bad, with

the exception of the "Hui,"[35] and the line "Sorrow reposes in my

bosom," for sorrow cannot repose. After all, in an opera, the poetry

must be the handmaid of the music. Why do Italian comic operas always

please, in spite of their wretched librettos--even in Paris, as I was

witness myself? Because the music is supreme, and everything else is

forgotten. All the more then will an opera be likely to please in which

the plan of the piece is well carried out, and the words are written

simply to suit the music; not turned and twisted so as to ruin the

composition for the sake of a miserable rhyme, which God knows does far

more harm than good in a dramatic representation.[36] Verse, indeed, is

indispensable for music, but rhyme is bad in its very nature: and poets

who go to work so pedantically will certainly come to grief, together

with the music. It would be by far the best if a good composer who

understands the theatre, and know-how to produce a piece, and a clever

poet, could be (like a veritable phoenix), united in one; there would

be no reason to be afraid as to the applause of the ignorant then. The

poets seem to me something like trumpeters, with their

{MUTUAL RELATIONS OF MUSIC AND VERSE.}

(227)

mechanical tricks--if we composers were to adhere so closely to our

rules (which were well enough as long as we knew no better) we should

soon produce music just as worthless as their worthless books."[37]

"Now I think I have talked nonsense enough for this time"--so Mozart

concludes this interesting letter, as he was fond of doing when his

desire to justify himself had led him into general aesthetic questions,

on which he was averse to expatiating at any length. His opinion as

to the relative positions of music and poetry in operatic works is

unusually interesting. In complete opposition to Gluck, who considered

music as subordinate to poetry, Mozart requires that poetry shall be the

handmaid of music. In the sense in which the context shows him to have

meant it, he is undoubtedly right. He exacts that the plan of the piece

shall be well laid out; that is, that the plot shall be interesting,

and shall as it proceeds afford dramatic situations fitted for musical

expression. He requires further that the words shall be written merely

for the music, that is, that the poetical conceptions shall be of a kind

to stimulate the composer, to elevate and support him, while allowing

him perfect freedom of thought and action. He had mentioned Osmin's song

to Stephanie, and the music was ready before the latter had written a

word of the poetry; the words he then prepared accorded so admirably

with the musical ideas which had been running in Mozart's head, that

faults here and there in the versification did not seem to him of much

consequence.

The impulse he required for his musical conceptions was the

representation of the dramatis persona in certain definite situations,

not the verbal framing of the poet's ideas.[38] The

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(228)

points which were contained in the verse, and influenced the

construction of the musical idea, were to him co-operating but not

dominating elements. The words of an opera have a definite object; they

provide foundation and support for the musical expression, and are not

therefore absolutely independent, as in the drama,[39] but are obliged

to recognise and respect the laws of music, as well as those of poetry.

To attain this end a compromise is as indispensable as in every other

union of the sister arts. Architecture, in her highest achievements,

turns for embellishment to sculpture and painting; and no one has ever

doubted that in such co-operation each art must make some concession

to the other. The architectural plan must be so conceived as to afford

fitting space and position for the sculpture and painting; these, on the

other hand, must be introduced with a view to the essential conditions

of the building; the pediment, the arch, the metope are not freely

selected forms, but constitute the limitations which arise from the

necessities of the building. The sculptor modifies his style to suit the

character of the building, the painter knows how to give significance

to the whole design by skilful composition and combinations of colour on

the flat surface of the walls. Doubtless architecture, with her severe

laws and inflexible forms, imposes restrictions on the fancies of

the artist; but who can imagine that Phidias in the sculptures of the

Parthenon, Raphael in the Loggia of the Vatican, renounced their freedom

of design or their independence of execution in obedience to the will

of the architect? The relation between poetry and music is of the same

kind. Mozart saw the necessity for co-operation between the musician and

the poet, if the right effect was to be given in its just proportions.

The musician must be ready to "give some hints" which shall put the poet

in possession of his intentions and of the conditions necessitated

by the rules of his art; the poet must be "intelligent," clever, and

cultivated enough to fall in with the intentions of the musician, and

poet enough to retain his poetical powers in spite of these limitations.

{MUTUAL RELATIONS OF MUSIC AND VERSE.}

(229)

Mozart is quite right in asserting that co-operation of this kind is

the surest pledge for an altogether satisfactory opera; unhappily he is

quite right also in declaring such a co-opera-tion to be attainable only

by "a veritable phoenix."

To a certain degree a mutual understanding is of course indispensable,

but it confines itself, as a rule, to an unwilling concession on this or

the other side.[40] Music finally assumes the mastery in opera, where

it is the actual medium of expression; no one could deny that good music

would make the poorest verse pass muster, whereas bad music could not be

made acceptable even when "wedded to immortal verse." But the very

fact that music appeals direct to the senses gives it an advantage when

opposed to poetry, which reaches the imagination through the intellect;

just as a poetical description of a work of art falls far short of

the effect produced directly on the mind by contemplation of the work

itself. Music works on the sense of hearing in an as yet inexplicable

manner, rousing emotions and fancies with an instantaneous power

surpassing that of poetry. Even if this be disputed, it must be allowed

that music does not appeal immediately to the intellect as language

does. Even the species of music which is said to occupy the intellect

most especially, viz., music in strict forms of counterpoint, does not

do it in such a way as to enable the hearer to discover the meaning

of the composition by means of its actual utterances; it exercises his

intellect otherwise by rousing the desire in him to grasp and hold the

artistic forms as such, and the laws upon which they depend.[41] Music

must borrow from poetry what it does not possess for itself, namely, the

ability to call forth a well-defined image which shall identify itself

with the sentiment evoked i by the music and give to this its exact

significance. This point is, of course, of special importance in opera,

although the fact must not be lost sight of that the stage accessories

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(230)

and pantomimic representation come greatly to the aid of the music,

so that it is quite possible for an audience to follow an opera with

interest and gratification without understanding the language in which

it is written. This is a further proof that, important as the poetic

details doubtless are, the plot and situations are the really essential

points. For the paradox that a libretto if it is to be musical cannot be

poetical, but can only have certain external forms of poetic delivery,

is certainly false. The conditions of poetic delivery and musical

execution are essentially the same, and a distinction between them is

impossible. But the means of delivery which the poet has at his disposal

are manifold and varied, and not all applicable in the same place; if

the poet is master of his art, and has a clear conception of what he is

striving after, he will know what are the particular means he ought to

employ to be in accord with the musical part of the work.[42]

Bretzner was very indignant at the proposed alterations in his libretto,

and inserted the following notice in the "Berliner Litteratur und

Theater-Zeitung" (No. 1783):--

It has pleased some hitherto unknown person in Vienna to take in hand my

opera, "Belmont und Constanze," or "Die Entführung aus dem Serail,"

and to publish the piece in a very altered form. The alterations in the

dialogue are not considerable, and may be passed over; but the adapter

has inserted a vast number of songs, the words of which are in many

cases edifying and touching in the highest possible degree. I would not

willingly deprive the improver of the glory belonging to his work, and

I therefore take this opportunity of specifying these inserted songs as

belonging to the Vienna edition and Mozart's composition.

In conclusion, and after giving "a specimen of the improver's work

from the quartet," Bretzner exclaims: "And this is called improvement!"

Nevertheless the text was improved, and although far from first-rate, it

had been rendered a fairly satisfactory and practicable libretto, which

has not yet been very far surpassed in the literature of German comic

opera. The plot is certainly not thrilling, but it

{THE "ENTFÜHRUNG," A GERMAN OPERA.}

(231)

allows the natural development of a succession of musical situations. It

was, as we have seen, Mozart's merit to recognise these in his musical

representation, to make them available in such a way as to distinguish

the "Entführung" from all earlier vaudevilles and operettas.

Mozart's performance was not confined to the adoption of certain

ready-developed forms of Italian opera, pressed into the service of the

German opera, partly from necessity, partly from the narrow principle

that the songs were to be sung by personages of supposed high

position.[43] This would have been no sufficient reason for substituting

the aria for the Lied; it was done to give full scope to musical

construction, and to make the standard and measure of the execution to

consist only in the artistic conditions of the dramatic situations, and

in the nature of the musical expression.[44]

At home as he was in Italian, French and German opera, in sacred and

instrumental music, he had obtained such a mastery over musical forms

as gave him a freedom of action which his favourable circumstances in

Vienna allowed him to make use of, and the fact that he was composing a

German opera gave him a sense of a still higher freedom. He was German

in every thought and feeling, and German music was his natural way of

expressing himself as an artist, requiring no unusual form, no special

characterisation, nothing but freedom of thought and action. In

the "Entführung," German sentiment, emotion, and disposition found

expression for the first time at the hands of a true artist. It is easy

to understand how the fulness of life and truth in such a work would

throw into the shade all who believed solely in those forms which were

borrowed from foreign

{DIE EXTFÜHRUXG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(232)

sources, and only superficially remodelled.[45] This truly German and

truly Mozart-like style is nowhere more decidedly exemplified than in

the part of Belmont. It is only necessary to note the contrast between

the male sopranos of the opera seria, or the comic lovers of the opera

buffa, and this Belmont, who expresses manly love in all its force and

intensity. It is plain that his love is not the wild and transitory

gleam of passion, but an emotion having its roots deep in the heart,

sanctified by sorrow, and held with the constancy of a true moral

nature. Manliness is the ground-tone of all his agitated sentiments; the

steady glow of a well-balanced mind penetrates every" expression of his

feelings. It is an easier task to portray the wild excitement of passion

than to depict a mind and character in its totality by means of each

separate expression;[46] and the conception of love, the essential

motive power of musical drama, from this point of view, marks an era in

musical representation, important alike for its national character and

its artistic construction. It was not by mere chance that Mozart

made the tenor voice, which had been virtually deprived of its proper

province in Italian opera, into the organ of manly love and tenderness.

Belmont has become a type in German opera. Adamberger, judging from

contemporary testimony was the most fitting representative of such a

character.[47] Various songs composed for him by Mozart characterise him

as a singer of noble and expressive delivery.[48]

{BELMONT.}

(233)

Belmont's character and tone of mind are drawn in firm lines in his

first cavatina (1). His state of anxious suspense is implied rather than

fully indicated by his expression of secret devotion. But this little

song, which none but a master-hand could have thrown off so lightly and

so surely, is of most significance, by reason of its connection with the

overture. Mozart makes no remark to his father on the overture except

that it was short, and that "it alternates between forte and piano, the

Turkish music being always forte, modulated by changes of key, and I do

not think any one can go to sleep over it, even if they have lain awake

all the night before" (September 26, 1781). As usual, when he speaks of

his compositions, he only indicates the means employed and the external

effect, and does not attempt any verbal description of the music itself.

It is certainly true that a lively and incessant suspense is kept up by

the constant modulatory changes, especially from major to minor, and

by sharp contrasts of _forte_ and _piano_. But this is not all; the

character of the overture is so singularly fanciful that a few bars

suffice to place the hearer in an imaginative mood. The most varied

emotions of joy and sorrow are lightly touched, but never held, the tone

of the whole is so fresh and cheerful that the listener involuntarily

yields to the spell; and the impressions of the new world in which he

finds himself are heightened by the highly original tone-colouring. Then

comes a slower movement, expressing longing desires in the tenderest,

most appealing tones. It has scarcely died away before we are again

whirled along our fantastic course, which ends in an appealing cry,

followed without a pause by Belmont's cavatina, "Hier soli ich dich denn

sehen, Constanze!" We recognise at

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(234)

once the middle movement of the overture, but changed from the minor to

the major key. This change, and the difference of shading between

the arrangement for the voice and that for the orchestra, give to the

charming little movement two distinct expressions, just as the same

landscape has two different aspects seen at noon or in the moonlight.

The overture renders us free to receive the effect of the work of art

as such, prepared by what forms the starting-point of the work; and the

first song sets the crown on the overture, while it transports us at

once into the frame of mind which predominates throughout the opera.

Still more important in its climax and composition is Belmont's second

song (4). The situation is more definitely developed; Belmont knows now

that Constanze is there, that he will soon see her, and this certainty

condenses all the emotions roused by the memory of a sorrowful past, and

the prospect of a perilous future, into the one feeling of their speedy

reunion. Mozart was so taken with this song that he wrote it down as

soon as he received the libretto. "This is the favourite song of all who

have heard it--myself included," he wrote to his father (September

26, 1781), "and is exactly calculated for Adamberger's voice. 'Fo wie

ängstlich, o wie feurigl' You can imagine how it is expressed, with

the very beating of the heart--the violins in octaves. One can see the

trembling, the hesitation, the very swelling of the breast is expressed

by a crescendo, one can hear the sighs, the whispers, rendered by the

violins muted, with one flute in unison."

It would be doing Mozart an injustice to consider this sound-painting

as his first object; it is in reality but a subordinate, although a very

effective and useful element of the whole musical conception. Belmont's

two other songs--one in the second act, before the meeting with

Constanze (15),[49] and the other at the beginning of the third act,

before the

{CONSTANZE.}

(235)

abduction (17)[50]--are much quieter in tone, and are characterised

by manly composure combined with warm sensibility. These qualities are

visible also in the musical construction of the broad and expressive

cantilene, which allows free scope for the display of a full tenor

voice in its best position. The structure of the melodies diverges in

a remarkable degree from that which predominates in Mozart's Italian

operas, and approaches nearer to that employed in his instrumental

music. And yet the national character of the melodies is not so

pronounced in the "Entführung" as in the "Zauber-flöte," nor are the

songs in their whole design so completely absolved from Italian forms.

The part of Constanze, so far as musical characterisation is concerned,

is not nearly so well thought out as that of Belmont. "I have been

obliged," writes Mozart to his father (September 26, 1781), "to

sacrifice Constanze's song (6) in some degree to the voluble organ of

Mdlle. Cavalieri. But I have sought to express 'Trennung war mein banges

Loos und nun schwimmt mein Aug' in Thranen' as far as is compatible with

an Italian bravura song."[51] We shall readily allow that he has been so

far successful; and that, apart from the inserted bravura passages, the

song is not only fine from a musical point of view, but appropriate

to the situation. But in the great bravura song of the second act

everything has been sacrificed to Mdlle. Cavalieri's voluble organ, and,

as Gluck would have said, it _smells of music_,[52] It is, as we have

seen, inserted without reference to the plot, and this may have led

to the further consequence of treating it altogether as an extraneous

piece. As regards length and difficulty, it is one of the greatest of

bravura songs, and is accompanied by four obbligato instruments--flute,

oboe, violin, and

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(236)

violoncello.[53] Considered as a concert piece it is of importance by

reason of the plan, artistic in design and execution, which permits

the treatment of the five obbligato parts as integral divisions of

the whole, while making due provision for sound effects and musical

interest. The song is still often sung, although the glitter surrounding

mere execution has passed away. But it does not belong to the

"Entführung." Together with the brilliant execution there is a certain

heroic tone in the song which is quite out of keeping with the opera and

with the character of Constanze in it. The true Con-stanze, as Mozart

imagined her, is found in the second air (10), which expresses with much

truth and intensity the ardent longing of the maiden sorrowing for

her lover. Firmness and assurance are manly attributes, but a dreamy

resigned absorption in the contemplation of vanished happiness is proper

to a woman, and to this maidenly sentiment Mozart has given beautiful

expression. This feminine tone gives the song a certain resemblance to

that of Ilia in "Idomeneo" (Vol. II., p. 151); but the latter is, as the

situation requires, drawn in darker lines, and takes more hold on the

mind. Here as elsewhere the same point is noticeable, viz., that when

Mozart works outward from the heart of an individual situation, the

separate elements of the musical construction are more striking, and the

form is freer and more lifelike than it would otherwise be.[54]

The instrumentation also is peculiarly effective, especially by the

employment of the wind instruments, which shed a gentle glow over the

whole. Mozart, against his custom,

{OSMIN.}

(237)

makes use of the basset-horn instead of the clarinet in this song.

In the part of Belmont, too, the instrumentation is modified to

some extent. The second song (4) is very delicate and tender in its

instrumentation, the wind instruments being treated as solos, although

not concertante; in the others there is a very pithy forcible tone,

which in the last (16) becomes almost brilliant.

The duet (20), owing to the singularity of the situation, differs

materially in character from an ordinary love duet. Within sight of

death each of the lovers has the painful consciousness of having led the

other to destruction; and their mutual endeavour to console one another

with the certainty of their love, which death may consummate but cannot

destroy, raises them to the height of enthusiastic inspiration. This

sentiment is excellently well expressed in the first calm movement with

fervour and clearness, and a perceptible blending of painful emotion and

loving consolation; the second movement does not quite reach the same

high level. Not only do some of the passages, and the very tedious

conclusion, make concessions to passing effect, but the expression does

not rise to the ecstatic strain which is implied in the situation.[55]

The noble forms of the two lovers stand in the sharpest contrast to that

of Osmin, which is altogether Mozart's creation, and certainly one of

the most original characters of dramatic music. The very way in which

he is introduced is masterly. After Belmont has sung his cavatina, which

breathes the noblest love and constancy, Osmin comes out of the house to

gather figs; he sings a song for his pastime; it is a love song, but one

suggested by painful jealousy. The minor key of Osmin's song gives it a

wild, desolate expression, in strong contrast to the cheerful candour of

the cavatina; many popular songs have this expression, and Osmin's song

is successfully imitated from the popular style. The phrasing is clumsy

in spite of the marked rhythm, but the effect is quite startling when

Osmin in a complacent hum

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(238)

repeats the last words an octave lower, and then at once breaks out

into a wild "Trallalera!" The uncouth fellow lolls and stretches so

completely at his ease that there cannot be a moment's doubt of how

unamiable he will prove to be if any one should venture to cross

his path.[56] This is soon put to the proof. He refuses with assumed

indifference to answer Belmont's repeated inquiries, and on the latter

interrupting him (involuntarily, as it were, with the melody of his own

song, which has so irritated Belmont), the unabashed rudeness of Osmin

breaks out in speech. It is as interesting as instructive to note how in

this duet the simplest and easiest means of musical representation

are used to produce a continuous climax and the most lively

characterisation. While it is still in full train Pedrillo enters, and

Osmin turns upon him with a fresh outbreak of rage in the song which

Mozart had spoken of to his father (3). Again changing his tactics, he

endeavours to repress his opponent with all the weight of his dignity

and cleverness. Gravity and importance, expressed by the rhythm,

the pompous intervals, the syncopated accompaniment, alternate

with impatience and haste, when the singer becomes irritated. Very

characteristic is the demeanour of Osmin as he complacently nurses the

thought: "I have my wits about me!" ("Ich hab' auch Ver-stand!"). He

works himself gradually up into a rage, and the threats which he pours

forth in a breath fall like blows on the head of the hapless Pedrillo.

The effect is produced by the accentuation given to the rapid flow of

words; the first fourth of every bar is forcibly given by the orchestra,

and the second is taken up by the voice in fifths, and then in octaves.

At last he comes to a triumphant close, and one thinks it is all over.

But he has only stopped to take breath, and at once resuming his furious

course, he ends by completely overpowering his opponent. Mozart writes

to his father on the conclusion of this song (September 26, 1781): "The

'Drum beim Barte des Propheten' is in the same time, but the notes are

more rapid, and as his anger grows one imagines the climax must be close

at hand; the allegro assai

{OSMIN--TURKISH MUSIC.}

(239)

follows in quite a different time and key, and has an excellent effect.

A man in such violent rage oversteps all bounds of moderation, and

loses all command over himself, and so must the music. But since," he

continues, expressing in simple words that wherein lies the charm of all

true art, "since the passions, violent or not, must never be carried to

the point of producing disgust, and the music, however thrilling, must

never fail to satisfy the ear, consequently must always remain music, I

have not chosen a distant key to follow the F (the key of the song) but

an allied one; not the nearest key of all, D minor, but the farther

one of A minor." In point of fact, the effect of the minor key is

extraordinary, both here and in other places where it is only cursorily

touched. It adds to the frenzied wildness of the character in which lust

and cruelty are blended, and it is emphasised by the strongly marked

though monotonous rhythm. And how wonderfully all these characteristics

are enhanced by the instrumentation!

"Osmin's rage," writes Mozart, "acquires a comic element by the

introduction of the Turkish music." The effect is enhanced by the

simplicity which has hitherto characterised the instrumentation. The

oboes (with bassoons and horns) predominate until, in the last verse:

"Sonderlich beim Monden-scheine," a flute insinuates itself with very

good effect. There are many characteristic touches in spite of the

scanty means at disposal, as for instance, the mocking entry of the oboe

at the words, "Ich hab' auch Verstand."

The Turkish music serves for far more than local colour and

characterisation. The expression of fanaticism is coloured as well as

heightened by the shrill sound of the piccolo flute, the blows of the

drum and cymbals, and the tingle of the triangles.[57] The bewilderment

produced by these

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(240)

instruments, the breathless rapidity of the movement, and the monotony

of the rhythm make one feel that giddiness must ensue if it goes on

much longer. But Mozart never makes us giddy, he makes use of the most

forcible means for characterisation, but never to the point of becoming

painful, and all with so much cheerfulness and humour that the total

effect is decidedly pleasing.

We make acquaintance with Osmin's boorish character in many different

situations; he is true to himself in them all. The second great song

(19) contrasts in some measure with the first. He is triumphant, he

has his enemies in his power, and he is beside himself with joy; but he

retains the same savage nature, and in the midst of all his rejoicing

the main point for him is that he can now loll and stretch himself

comfortably, which he proceeds to do to his heart's content on the

long-sustained A and D, to which he easily carries his scale. Especially

characteristic is the middle movement of this song. One seems to see a

wild beast, now yawning and stretching, now crouching for a spring;

grim cruelty and lustful indolence are wonderfully characterised by the

alternation of octaves and dissonant suspensions in the accompaniment,

as well as by the triplet passages which are given by the orchestra in

unison, as if there could be no harmony here; the expression of joy is

mingled with unspeakable brutality, and comes to a climax in the shrill

note of exultation at the close.[58] But Osmin shows himself a true

poltroon in the duet with Blondchen (9)--her snappish impudence

completely gets the better of him, and although he endeavours to overawe

her with the deepest notes of his deep bass voice, her persiflage drives

her unwieldy antagonist quite out of the field. The lament which he

thereupon sings: "Ihr Englander, seid ihrnicht Thoren, ihr lasst euren

Weibem den Willen!" ("You Englishmen, what fools you are, to leave your

wives their freedom!") is in contrast to his love song, and completes

the conception of it. Here there is nothing of

{OSMIN.}

(241)

the barbarous nature which showed itself in lust and jealousy, but only

the pitiful whining of a slavish soul which trembles before a resolute

woman's will. The characterisation of the last movement--when Osmin

gives up all appearance of superiority and yields upon every point--is

charming, and produced by the simplest musical means. He displays

another side of his character in the duet (14) in which Pedrillo induces

him to drink.[59] His senses are soon overcome, and he endeavours

to outvie Pedrillo. It is of advantage to the situation that the

personality of the singers required that even here Osmin must be

considered the chief person; one only needs to hear the arrogance with

which he delivers the principal subject in order to feel sure on whom

the wine will take strongest effect,[60] and even when the rapidly

concluded entente cordiale is expressed in unison, Osmin's low-pitched

octaves keep the upper hand. But here, too, Mozart keeps within bounds,

and never goes beyond a joke; Osmin's drunken sleep is excluded from his

representation. Osmin's character is least strongly characterised in the

terzet (7), of which Mozart writes to his father as follows (September

26, 1781):--

Now for the terzet which concludes the first act. Pedrillo has

represented his master as an architect, which affords him an opportunity

of meeting his Constanze in the garden. The Pasha has taken him into

his service; and Osmin, as overseer, and knowing nothing of this, is

insolent to him as a stranger, being himself an unmannerly churl and

the arch-enemy of all strangers, and refuses to allow him to enter the

garden. The first movement is short, and as the words allowed of it I

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(242)

have kept the three voices fairly well together; but then begins the

major _pianissimo_, which must go very fast, and the conclusion will

draw many tears, which is just what the conclusion of a first act should

do; the more tears the better--but the shorter the better, so that the

audience may not forget the applause.

We see from this that Mozart thought more in this instance of a vivid

expression of the situation than of minute characterisation, and all

the three characters are alike in their urging and scolding. The

advisability, therefore, of keeping the three voices "fairly well"

together, their imitative arrangement keeping up the impression of

great excitement, is indicated by the situation, although, owing to

the necessity for stricter attention to form, the individual

characterisation is thereby limited.

Osmin's last appearance in the finale is very amusing. While all the

other characters are expressing their gratitude, in the favourite form

of a round, Osmin tries in vain to keep in the same track; but the

round sticks in his throat, and his angry spite will have vent; the

hunting-song of the first act with the obbligato janizaries' music

rushes once more past our ears. Although some elements borrowed from the

conventional forms of the Italian bass buffo are discernible in the part

of Osmin, yet Mozart has made use of them in such an entirely original

manner that they are closely interwoven in his own creation. It is,

however, the consistency of the individual characterisation which

distinguishes the part of Osmin and raises it far above the ordinary

buffo parts, causing it to afford a striking instance of Mozart's

eminent talent for dramatic construction.

The part requires a performer such as Fischer, of whom Reichardt

writes: "He is an excellent bass singer; his voice has the depth of a

violoncello, and the height of an ordinary tenor; its compass is--[See

Page Image]

so that his deep notes are never harsh, nor his high ones shrill; his

voice flows with ease and certainty, and is full of charm. In praise of

his style I need only say that he is a

{FISCHER.}

(243)

worthy pupil of the great tenor Raaff, who was, and still is considered,

the best tenor in all Europe. Fischer has a more flexible organ than

perhaps any other bass singer, and his acting is as good in serious

drama as in comic."

Such materials as this are calculated to bring forth good effects. Among

them may be noted the original sense of climax which Mozart produces

by repeating a passage an octave lower; this is done in the Lied and

in both of Osmin's airs at the words "Ich hab' auch Verstand" (3), and

"Denn nun hab ich vor euch Ruh!" (19). The same effect occurs in the

beautiful song "Non sö d'onde viene," composed also for Fischer; an

expressive and sustained passage is repeated an octave lower, and the

effect is very beautiful.

In order to give an adequate idea of Fischer's powers, the two serious

songs composed for him by Mozart must be considered along with this

decidedly comic part. The above-mentioned, "Non sò d'onde viene" (512

K.), broad in conception and style, displays the whole compass and

wealth of Fischer's organ in the most favourable light. The other,

"Aspri rimorsi atroce" (432 K.), composed in 1783, is remarkable for

the expression of a gloomy, agitated mood, not illumined by any ray of

light.

An expressive recitative is followed by a single movement (allegro, F

minor) in incessant agitation, the almost uninterrupted triplets of the

stringed instruments giving it the character of trembling unrest. The

voice part is very striking by reason of its decided rhythm and frequent

dissonant intervals; but it is mostly declamatory, and there is no

appearance of a cantilene proper; the wind instruments give effect

to the strong accents. The whole song pursues its rapid course like

a gloomy nocturne, and dies away at last in a dull moan. This song is

distinguished among all that Mozart has written by its uninterrupted

expression of gloomy passion, and it would be almost inconceivable that

he intended it for concert singing, did we not know that Fischer was to

sing it: he was unsurpassed in every species of delivery.

The parts of Blondchen and Pedrillo are not by any

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(244)

means so important in their characterisation as those of the principal

personages, neither have they much influence on the development of

the plot. Blondchen, besides her share in the duet with Osmin, has two

songs, of which the first (8) is in no way remarkable, written evidently

for a seconda donna. The only point to be noted is a passage going up

to--[See Page Image]

which gives proof of Mdlle. Teyber's vocal powers.[61] The second song

(12) is far fresher and more original, and expresses heartfelt joy in so

lively and charming a manner, without ever overstepping the province

of a good-humoured soubrette, that the hearer is involuntarily beguiled

into the same cheerful frame of mind. A German element is unmistakably

present (we are reminded of the "Zauberflote"), and we may note the

first appearance of those naïve girl-parts common to German opera.[62]

Mozart has given to Pedrillo's song (15) somewhat of a military tone,

suggested perhaps by the opening words "Frisch zum Kampfe!" and although

his servile nature is indicated here and there in the accompaniment, the

effect of the whole is too forcible and brilliant for the character.[63]

On the other hand, the romanze (18) which he sings in the third act to

the guitar is a jewel of delicate characterisation. Not, however, with

any reference to Pedrillo himself, for he sings the song, not from

personal impulse, but as something he has heard and learnt; but the

strange effects of harmony and rhythm, the mixture of bold

{PEDRILLO--QUARTET.}

(245)

knightly impulse with timid dismay, is so fantastic, so unreal, that we

seem to be ourselves in Moorish lands, and are readily persuaded that we

are listening to genuine Moorish music. But we are listening, in fact,

to no music but Mozart's, whose own mind evolved the music which the

situation demanded, without any previous philological study of Moorish

national melodies. The two choruses of janizaries (so Mozart calls them

in the score[64] ) are not only characterised by the Turkish airs they

embody, but by original harmonies and rhythm which give them a foreign

and national character, without any special regard as to whether it is

actually Turkish or not.[65]

We have already had occasion to remark how the ensemble movements

proceed naturally from the exigencies of the situation, and are

therefore essential to the musical characterisation of the work. This is

especially true of the quartet (16), which forms the conclusion of the

second act. Belmont and Constanze meet for the first time in the Pasha's

garden, where are also Blondchen and Pedrillo. The meeting of the

lovers is the more significant, since it is in anticipation of their

approaching flight. An unusually elevated tone of sentiment is therefore

common to them all; but the particular circumstances produce many

different shades of feeling, and each character has its own distinct

peculiarities. It is the task of the composer to combine this

multifariousness into an artistic whole. The scenic accessories come

very happily to his aid. The two pairs of lovers wander about the garden

in close converse, so that they are heard sometimes apart, sometimes one

after the other, sometimes together, according to the requirements of

the situation and of the musical grouping. The beginning is a simple

matter. Constanze and Belmont

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(246)

express their feelings in a short duet-like movement, full of heart, such

as Mozart has made proper to lovers. When they turn aside Pedrillo and

Blondchen advance, deep in consultation on the flight, so that the music

assumes a lighter and more cheerful tone. But their thoughts are also

occupied with the approaching happy turn in their fortunes, and when

Belmont and Constance draw near, they all spontaneously join in the

expression of joyful emotion. Small touches betray the master. The

consultation between Pedrillo and Blondchen is in A major, and closes

with an easy phrase on the words: "Wär der Augenblick schon da!" ("O,

that the moment had come!"), very expressive of the girl's character.

The orchestra at once takes up this phrase with great emphasis, produced

both by the sudden change to the key of D major and by the forcible

unison of the instruments, as if they were exclaiming, "It has come!"

and then leads back simply and expressively to the leading motif, which

now for the first time asserts its full significance:--[See Page Image]

But now the tone grows troubled. Belmont cannot repress a feeling of

jealousy, and, embarrassed and confused, he seeks to express his doubts

to Constanze, who does not understand him. Pedrillo follows in the

same direction to Blondchen, who is far more ready in apprehending his

meaning. The oboe gives charming expression to the feelings which

the jealous lovers scarcely dare to clothe in words. Then Belmont and

Constanze came forward again. The two men speak together, each after

his manner--Belmont noble and open, Pedrillo with chattering haste.

Constanze bursts into tears, Blondchen answers Pedrillo with a box on

the ears; the women lament together, and the men are aware that they

have gone too far. After the lively expression of these contrasting

emotions in rapid alternation,

{QUARTET.}

(247)

the lovers emerge from the confusion, explain themselves as to their

true feelings, and so prepare for the reconciliation. The short ensemble

movement in which Mozart consummates this dénouement (andante 6-8) is

one of those passages of which a friend used to say that "der liebe

Gott" himself could not have done it better; the purest beauty and

a truly holy expression of satisfaction penetrates the simple and

unpretending phrase. The magic of such conceptions cannot be rendered in

words, nor can it be satisfactorily indicated by what actual means the

effect is attained, and yet it is always of interest to see the master

in his workshop.

It is easy to see in this case that the key selected (A major) combines

with the rhythm and the harmonic treatment to produce the wished-for

effect. It gives the voices a pitch allowing of the clearest and most

melodious tones, heightened in their effect by the deeper pitch of the

accompanying stringed instruments, and it also, although in fact the

nearest key to the principal one, produces an impression of surprise as

great as though it were a more distant one. This is due to what precedes

the adoption of the A major key. The first movement in D major is

followed by one in G minor, which leads to E flat major, B minor, F

major; D minor is just touched, but only to pass again through C minor

and B flat major into G minor, with a rapid transition into E major.

After this restless change of key, the passage into A major has

a wonderfully tranquillising effect, and the adherence to the

key throughout the movement gives it a peculiar charm. But the

reconciliation has not yet taken place; the lovers sue for pardon,

but the two women allow them first to feel their injustice, and here

Blondchen assumes the lead by virtue of her fluent tongue, while the men

supplicate more and more earnestly, until at last peace is concluded.

This movement is a model of dramatic characterisation. An excellent

effect is produced by Blondchen's singing throughout in triplets (12-8

against 4-4), in contrast to the calm flowing melodies for the other

voices. The movement only acquires its full significance by contrast

with what has preceded it.

{DIE ENTFÜHRUNG AUS DEM SERAIL.}

(248)

When pardon has been granted, every trace of past sorrow is obliterated

by the feeling of complete satisfaction. After so much mental strain a

complete relaxation is necessary from a musical point of view. The last

movement is therefore very simple, although appropriately brilliant and

fiery. It seldom departs from the principal key, and is frequently in

canon form; very light passages for the voices, rapid instrumentation,

and an unusually effective _crescendo_ at the close, give it an

impulsive and quickening effect. This was the first really dramatic

ensemble movement in a German opera, and in it we find concentrated all

Mozart's services to the German opera--a full and free employment of all

the means afforded by song and orchestra to give musical expression to

emotion, without subservience to any more binding forms than those laws

which are founded on the nature of music.

The masterly treatment of the orchestra in the "Entführung has been

repeatedly pointed out, and there is no need to repeat that Mozart

turned to account all the advantages offered to him by the Vienna

orchestra. In comparison with "Idomeneo" the instrumentation is not

exactly scantier, but it is clearer and simpler; the tendency to employ

the different instruments independently, to bring forward subordinate

subjects, &c., is held in check, and the details are more lightly

treated on account of stage effects. "I think I may venture to

lay down," says Weber, "that in the 'Entführung' Mozart's _artist

experience_ came to maturity, and that his _experience of the world_

alone was to lead him to further efforts. The world might look for

several operas from him like 'Figaro' and 'Don Juan,' but with the best

will possible he could only write one 'Entführung.' I seem to perceive

in it what the happy years of youth are to every man; their bloom never

returns, and the extirpation of their defects carries with it some

charms which can never be recovered."[66]

FOOTNOTES OF CHAPTER XXV.

[Footnote 1: Gottsched, Nothiger Vorrath, p. 314.]

[Footnote 2: Schletterer, Das Deutsche Singspiel, p. 110.]

[Footnote 3: Chronologie des Deutschen Theaters, p. 109. Plümicke, Entwurf e.

Theatergesch. von Berlin, p. 193.]

[Footnote 4: Furstenau, Zur Gesch. der Musik zu Dresden, II., p. 246.]

[Footnote 5: Chronol., p. 159; Cäcilia, VIII., p. 277.]

[Footnote 6: Weisse, Selbstbiogr., pp. 25, 41; Blümner, Gesch. d. Theat. in

Leipzig, p. 98.]

[Footnote 7: Blümner, ibid. Danzel, Gottsched, p. 172.]

[Footnote 8: Chronol., p. 202]

[Footnote 9: Chronol., p. 247.]

[Footnote 10: Blumner, Gesch. d. Theat. in Leipzig, p. 159. Hiller, Wochentl.

Nachr., I., p. 219; II., pp. 135, 150. N. Bibl. d. Schön. Wiss., 1767,

IV., p. 178. [Reichardt] Briefe e. Aufm. Reia., II., p. 23. Meyer, L.

Schroder, I., p. 131. Goethe, Werke, XVII., p. 295.]

[Footnote 11: Hiller, Wöch. Nachr., I., p. 253; III., p. 59.]

[Footnote 12: Weisse, Selbstbiogr., p. 102.]

[Footnote 13: Hiller, Lebensbeschr. beruhmter Musikgelehrten, p. 311.]

[Footnote 14: Cf. Deutsch. Museum, 1779, II., p.268. Plümicke, Entwurf e.

Theatergesch. von Berlin, p. 205. The contrary is reported of Cassel as

a rare exception (Berl. Litt. u. Theat.-Ztg., 1783, II., p. 409).]

[Footnote 15: L. Schneider, Gesch. d. Oper in Berlin, p. 209.]

[Footnote 16: The constitution of the operatic repertory of the time is shown

in the review of the operettas performed in Berlin from 1771-1787 by

Schneider (Ibid., p. 206.).]

[Footnote 17: Reichardt, Ueb. d. Com. Oper., p. 20.]

[Footnote 18: "Operettas are the favourite pieces in Berlin, and cost a great

deal of money," wrote Ramier to Knebel, in 1772 (Litt Nachl., II., p.

36). He paid the actors of the first parts one louis-d'or, of the second

one ducat, and the rest two gulden for a first performance (Plümicke,

Entwurf e. Theatergesch. von Berlin, p. 274).]

[Footnote 19: Briefe e. Aufmerks. Reisenden, I., p. 147.]

[Footnote 20: Briefe e. Aufmerks. Reisenden, II., p. 94. Burney, Reise, III., p.

46.]

[Footnote 21: "Comic operas push out all tragedies and legitimate drama,"

complained Ramier in 1771 (Knebel, Litt. Nachl., II., p. 33). Boie

writes to Knebel to the same effect in 1771 (Litt. Nachl., II., p. 108):

"I do not like operettas. The taste which our public is developing for

them threatens to extinguish all hope of the revival of true comedy." So

also Schubart, Teutsche Chronik, 1774, pp. 349. 478; Knigge, Ephemer. d.

Litt. u. d. Theat., 1785, II., p. 98.]

[Footnote 22: A. M. Z., III., p. 327.]

[Footnote 23: Lessing's Werke, XI., p. 152.]

[Footnote 24: Weissc, Selbstbiogr., p. 103. Engel says the same in the preface to

the "Apotheke," p. viII. Cf. Schmid, Das Parterr, p. 155.]

[Footnote 25: Briefe eines Aufmerks. Reisenden, I., p. 141. Ueb. d. Com. Opera,

p. 6. Cf. Mus. Kunstmag., I., p. 161. Geist des Mus. Kunstmag,, p. 94.]

[Footnote 26: Riemer, Mitth., II., p. 111.]

[Footnote 27: Riemer, Mitth., II., p. 194.]

[Footnote 28: Goethe, Br. an Frau von Stein, III., pp. 181,191. Knebel, Litt.

Nachl., I., P 149.]

[Footnote 29: Riemer, Mitth., II., p. 192. Briefw. m. Zelter, II., p. 121.]

[Footnote 30: Goethe, Werke, XXI., p. 6. Cf. Br. an Frau von Stein, III., p. 235.]

[Footnote 31: Cf. Goethe, Briefw. mit Zelter, II., p. 121. Riemer, Mittheil.,

II., p. 292.]

[Footnote 32: "Belmont und Constanze, oder die Entfuhrung aus dem Serail." Eine

Operette. in drei Akten von C. F. Bretzner (Leipzig, 1781). A French

adaptation, "L'Enlèvement" was made by Ch. Destrais, Strasburg, 1857.]

[Footnote 33: Jul. André has lately published this interesting relic: duet,

"Welch ängst-liches Beben," zur Oper "Die Entfuhrung aus dem Serail "

von Mozart. Offenbach: André (389 K.).]

[Footnote 34: Cramer, Magazin der Musik, II., p. 1057.]

[Footnote 35: In Constanze's aria the words run:-- Mozart had previously written

to his father (September 26, 1781): "! have altered Hui into schnell,

thus: 'Doch wie schnell schwand meine Freude.' I do not know what our

German poets are thinking of. Even if they do not trouble themselves to

understand what is best fitted for dramatic or operatic treatment, they

need not make human beings converse like pigs."]

[Footnote 36: Reichardt finds special fault with the rhyming in his Briefe über

die musikalische Poesie, p. 115 (an appendix to his pamphlet on the

German Comic Opera, Leipzig, 1774).]

"Doch im Hui schwand meine

Freude Trennung war mein banges;

Und nun schwimmt mein Aug' in

Thränen Kummer ruht in meinem Schooss."]

[Footnote 37: It must be kept in mind that German operatic poets confined

themselves to imitating Italian opera libretti, which were all cast in

the same mould. Krause's pamphlet, highly esteemed by contemporaries,

Von der musikalischen Poesie (Berlin, 1752) takes this for granted;

Hiller (Ueber Metastasio, 1786, p.6) refers the German librettists to

Metastatio; even Goethe, although in another way, endeavoured to form

German vaudeville after an Italian type. Views of the subject, similar

to those of Mozart and Reichardt, are carried out in detail in Cramer's

Magazin der Musik, II., p. 1061.]

[Footnote 38: Gluck's intentions were unquestionably the same. He warred against

the mechanical formalism of musicians, and strove to free the composer

from the fetters of form and make him a poet. But he was in some danger

of going too far, and making the musician merely the interpreter of the

poet.]

[Footnote 39: Cf. Hanslick, Vom Musikalisch-Schönen, p. 27.]

[Footnote 40: The same difficulty has led composers of the present day to write

their own libretti. But it is not in nature that the highest aims can

thus be attained. Burney quotes Metastatio's utterances on this point

(Reise, II., p. 222). Cf. O. Jahn, Ges. Aufs. üb. Musik, p. 70.]

[Footnote 41: Cf. Hanslik Vom Musikalisch-Schönen, p. 78.]

[Footnote 42: Lessing has some excellent observations on the relations of music

to poetry in the continuation of his Laokoon (Werke, XI., p. 153).]

[Footnote 43: Hiller, Wochentl. Nachr., I., p. 256. Lebensbeschreibungen, I., p.

312. Reichardt, Ueb. d. Com. Oper, p. 8.]

[Footnote 44: He was perfectly aware that comic opera must follow its own laws.

"You cannot imagine,'' he wrote to his father (June 16,1781), "that I

should write an opéra comique in the same style as an opera seria. Just

as in an opera seria there must be a display of much learning and good

sense, and very little playfulness, so in an opera buffa there must be

very little display of learning and a great deal of playful merriment.

It cannot be helped if people will have comic music in an opera seria;

but there is a great difference. I believe that buffoonery is not quite

rooted out of music yet; and in this case the French are right."]

[Footnote 45: The autograph score of the "Entfùhrung" (384 K.), in three volumes

(453 pages), was presented by Mozart to his sister-in-law, Madame Hofer,

one evening when she had especially gratified him by her singing; it is

now in the possession of Paul Mendelssohn-Bartholdv. of Berlin. Some of

the odd sheets are in Andre's collection. Wolfgang writes to his father

July 20, 1782: "You will find many erasures, because I knew that the

score would be copied at once; so I let my ideas have free play, and

made my alterations and abbreviations before sending it to the copyist."]

[Footnote 46: The ancients indicated this distinction by the terms _pathos_ and

_ethos_.]

[Footnote 47: Meyer II. Schroder. I., p. 368 speaks of his nasal tones in the

high notes.]

[Footnote 48: These are the beautiful air, "Per pietä non ricercate" 420 K..

part Si; the air written in 1785 for the oratorio "Davide Penitente "

(469 K.. 61. "A te fra tanti attanni" and a grand air belonging to

1783 (431 K. part 3.) which is one of the most beautiful. It supposes

a faithful lover awaking to find himself in prison, and expressing his

surprise and anger in an agitated recitative, "Misero! O sogno!" In the

andante, "Aura che intomo spin," his thoughts turn to his beloved one,

for whom he is suffering; a simple and dignified cantilene, full of

warm, deep feeling. The allegro, expressive of his horror at his

position, is full of wild excitement and anguish. The whole song is

simple and full of manly dignity without bravura, which seems to have

been Adam-berger's peculiar style. The musical treatment is rich in

interesting detail; the wind instruments--flutes, bassoons, and

horns--are employed to give individual colouring.]

[Footnote 49: This air was considerably abbreviated by Mozart. In the adagio

there was originally a distinct middle movement following the second

occurrence of the subject; it passed into the key of E flat major, and

at the seventeenth bar closed in D minor, whereupon the first subject

recurred. The allegro was also shortened.]

[Footnote 50: This air also was considerably altered by Mozart.]

[Footnote 51: The same may almost be said of the air "Tra le oscure ombre

funeste," which Mozart composed in 1785 for Mdlle. Cavalieri in the

oratorio, "Davide Penitente" (469 K., 8). The first movement is

expressive of earnest feeling; the second has more of bravura.]

[Footnote 52: Salieri narrates that Gluck was dissatisfied with one part of his

"Danaides" without knowing the reason why; after many repetitions he

exclaimed at last, "I have it! the passage _smells of music!_" (Mosel,

Salieri, p. 79).]

[Footnote 53: The bravura part was originally extended into eleven bars (from bar

5, p. 153)f with the voices and instruments contending; the close was

also longer, fifteen bars being inserted at p. 175, bar 7. Rochlitz

asserts (A. M. Z., I., p. 145) that in later years Mozart undertook a

searching revision of the "Entfuhrung," making numerous alterations,

especially abbreviations. "I heard him play one of Constanze s principal

airs, after twofold revision, and deplored some of the omitted passages.

'They may do for the piano,' said he, 'but not on the stage.' When I

wrote that I was too fond of hearing myself, and did not know when to

leave off." This is the only instance known of such hypercriticism on

Mozart's part.]

[Footnote 54: It has already been remarked that Mozart made use of a motif from

"Zaide" for this air (Vol. II., p. 121).]

[Footnote 55: Tieck, Dramaturg. Blatter, II., p. 315: "The duet is one which

may draw tears from the eyes of the most insensible." Even Berlioz (X

Travers Chants, p. 243) thought highly of it.]

[Footnote 56: Cf. Lobe, A. M. Z., XLVIII., p. 537.]

[Footnote 57: A singular effect is given by the sustained notes of the oboes and

bassoons with the appoggiatura:--[See Page Image]

Mozart has made a similar use of them in the Wedding March in "Figaro,"

where he was equally desirous of imparting peculiarity of colouring.]

[Footnote 58: Mozart has used only the piccolo flute here, as specially adapted

for the tattoo-like principal subject, and its wild, shrill conclusion.

The clarinets are very originally treated, particularly in those places

where they are apart from the other wind instruments and support the

voice with sustained notes.]

[Footnote 59: Mozart's expression, in his letter to his father (September 26,

1781), "The drinking duet, which consists entirely of my Turkish tattoo

(Zapfenstreich)," leads to the conclusion that he has here made use

of an earlier composition, with which I am not acquainted. The Turkish

music, in conjunction with trumpets (no drums), is admirably suggestive

of Osmin's excited, half-tipsy state.]

[Footnote 60: This motif was evidently composed just as Osmin sings it. Fischer's

flexible and melodious voice made it doubly effective in contrast to the

less voluble tenor, so characteristic of the insignificant Pedrillo. At

the outset, an admirable effect is produced by the violins, strengthened

by piccolo and ordinary flutes, which gently accentuate the melody

detached from its simple but agitated accompaniment. There is something

peculiarly seductive in this melodious rippling sound, of which there is

another instance in the Moor's song in the "Zauberflöte."]

[Footnote 61: In its first design this air was considerably longer; the second

part began at p. mt bar 9, instead of p. 109, bar 19; it was in D major,

instead of A major, and led back into the first subject, bringing the

whole to a conclusion after twenty-nine interpolated bars.]

[Footnote 62: The instrumentation of this air in full, and the orchestral parts

carefully worked out; the accompaniment at the words "ohne Aufschub

will ich eilen" is unusually charming and animated. It also has been

shortened by Mozart.]

[Footnote 63: Arnold (Mozart's Geist, p. 375) interprets the words as though

Pedrillo was trying to assume a courage which he did not possess.]

[Footnote 64: He writes to his father of the first (September 26, 1781): "The

janizary chorus is all that can be desired, short and merry, and very

well suited for the Viennese public."]

[Footnote 65: Ulibicheff, who makes some striking observations on this chorus,

notices its many points of resemblance (such as the alternation of

relative major and minor keys) to Russian national melodies, with which

Mozart may have become acquainted at Prince Gallitzin's (II., p. 375).]

[Footnote 66: C. M. von Weber, Lebensbild, III., p. 191. Cf. A. Wendt, Leipzig

Kunstbl., 1817, p. 189. (Heinse, Reise- und Lebensskizzen, I., p. 298.)]

Life of Mozart, Vol. 2 (of 3) · 第 8 / 16 章