P. L. F.

_Friends and Fellow Citizens_:

There are times and seasons, when _general evils_ spread general

alarm and uneasiness, and yet arise from causes too complicated, and

too little understood by many, to produce an unanimity of opinions

respecting their remedies. Hence it is, that on such occasions, the

conflict of arguments too often excites a conflict of passions, and

introduces a degree of discord and animosity, which, by agitating the

public mind dispose it to precipitation and extravagance. They who on

the ocean have been unexpectedly enveloped with tempests, or suddenly

entangled among rocks and shoals, know the value of that serene,

self-possession and presence of mind, to which in such cases they owed

their preservation; nor will the heroes who have given us victory and

peace, hesitate to acknowledge that we are as much indebted for those

blessings to the calm prevision, and cool intrepidity which planned and

conducted our military measures, as to the glowing animation with which

they were executed.

While reason retains her rule, while men are as ready to receive as to

give advice, and as willing to be convinced themselves, as to convince

others, there are few political evils from which a free and enlightened

people cannot deliver themselves. It is unquestionably true, that the

great body of the people love their country, and wish it prosperity;

and this observation is particularly applicable to the people of a

_free_ country, for they have more and stronger reasons for loving it

than others. It is not therefore to vicious motives that the unhappy

divisions which sometimes prevail among them are to be imputed; the

people at large always mean well, and although they may on certain

oc- [4] casions be misled by the counsels, or injured by the efforts

of the few who expect more advantage from the wreck, than from the

preservation of national prosperity, yet the motives of these few, are

by no means to be confounded with those of the community in general.

That such seeds of discord and danger have been disseminated and begin

to take root in America, as unless eradicated will soon poison our

gardens and our fields, is a truth much to be lamented; and the more

so, as their growth rapidly increases, while we are wasting the season

in honestly but imprudently disputing, not whether they shall be pulled

up, but by whom, in what manner, and with what instruments, the work

shall be done.

When the king of Great Britain, misguided by men who did not merit

his confidence, asserted the unjust claim of binding us in all cases

whatsoever, and prepared to obtain our submission by force, the object

which engrossed our attention, however important, was nevertheless

plain and simple, “What shall we do?” was the question—the people

answered, let us unite our counsels and our arms. They sent Delegates

to Congress, and soldiers to the field. Confiding in the probity

and wisdom of Congress, they received their recommendations as if

they had been laws; and that ready acquiesence in their advice

enabled those patriots to save their country. Then there was little

leisure or disposition for controversy respecting the expediency of

measures—hostile fleets soon filled our ports, and hostile armies

spread desolation on our shores. Union was then considered as the most

essential of human means and we almost worshipped it with as much

fervor, as pagans in distress formerly implored the protection of their

tutelar deities. That union was the child of wisdom—heaven blessed it,

and it wrought out our political salvation.

That glorious war was succeeded by an advantageous peace. When danger

disappeared, ease, tranquility, and a sense of security loosened the

bands of union; and Congress and soldiers and good faith depreciated

with their apparent importance. Recommendations lost their influence,

and requisitions were rendered nugatory, not by their want of

propriety, but by their want of power. The spirit of private gain

expelled the spirit of public good, and men became more intent on the

means of enriching and aggrandizing themselves, than of enriching and

aggrandizing their country. Hence the war-worn veteran, whose re- [5]

ward for toils and wounds existed in written promises, found Congress

without the means, and too many of the States without the disposition,

to do him justice. Hard necessity compelled him, and others under

similar circumstances, to sell their honest claims on the public for a

little bread; and thus unmerited misfortunes and patriotic distresses

became articles of speculation and commerce.

These and many other evils, too well known to require enumeration,

imperceptibly stole in upon us, and acquired an unhappy influence on

our public affairs. But such evils, like the worst of weeds, will

naturally spring up in so rich a soil; and a good Government is as

necessary to subdue the one, as an attentive gardener or husbandman

is to destroy the other—Even the garden of Paradise required to be

dressed, and while men continue to be constantly impelled to error and

to wrong by innumerable circumstances and temptations, so long will

society experience the unceasing necessity of government.

It is a pity that the expectations which actuated the authors of the

existing confederation, neither have nor can be realized:—accustomed

to see and admire the glorious spirit which moved all ranks of people

in the most gloomy moments of the war, observing their steadfast

attachment to Union, and the wisdom they so often manifested both in

choosing and confiding in their rulers, those gentlemen were led to

flatter themselves that the people of America only required to know

what ought to be done, to do it. This amiable mistake induced them to

institute a national government in such a manner, as though very fit to

give advice, was yet destitute of power, and so constructed as to be

very unfit to be trusted with it. They seem not to have been sensible

that mere advice is a sad substitute for laws; nor to have recollected

that the advice even of the all-wise and best of Beings, has been always

disregarded by a great majority of all the men that ever lived.

Experience is a severe preceptor, but it teaches useful truths, and

however harsh, is always honest—Be calm and dispassionate, and listen

to what it tells us.

Prior to the revolution we had little occasion to inquire or know much

about national affairs, for although they existed and were managed, yet

they were managed _for_ us, but not _by_ us. Intent on our domestic

concerns, our internal legislative business, our agriculture, and our

buying and selling, we were seldom anxious about what passed or was [6]

doing in foreign Courts. As we had nothing to do with that department

of policy, so the affairs of it were not detailed to us, and we took as

little pains to inform ourselves, as others did to inform us of them.

War, and peace, alliances, and treaties, and commerce, and navigation,

were conducted and regulated without our advice or controul. While

we had liberty and justice, and in security enjoyed the fruits of

our “vine and fig tree,” we were in general too content and too much

occupied, to be at the trouble of investigating the various political

combinations in this department, or to examine and perceive how

exceedingly important they often were to the advancement and protection

of our prosperity. This habit and turn of thinking affords one reason

why so much more care was taken, and so much more wisdom displayed, in

forming our State Governments, than in forming our Federal or national

one.

By the Confederation as it now stands, the direction of general and

national affairs is committed to a single body of men, viz. the

Congress. They may make war, but are not empowered to raise men or

money to carry it on. They may make peace, but without power to

see the terms of it observed—They may form alliances, but without

ability to comply with the stipulations on their part—They may

enter into treaties of commerce, but without power to enforce them

at home or abroad—They may borrow money, but without having the

means of repayment—They may partly regulate commerce, but without

authority to execute their ordinances—They may appoint ministers and

other officers of trust, but without power to try or punish them for

misdemeanors—They may resolve, but cannot execute either with dispatch

or with secrecy—In short, they may consult, and deliberate, and

recommend, and make requisitions, and they who please, may regard them.

From this new and wonderful system of Government, it has come to

pass, that almost every national object of every kind, is at this

day unprovided for; and other nations taking the advantage of its

imbecility, are daily multiplying commercial restraints upon us. Our

fur trade is gone to Canada, and British garrisons keep the keys of

it. Our shipyards have almost ceased to disturb the repose of the

neighborhood by the noise of the axe and hammer; and while foreign

flags fly triumphantly above our highest houses, the American Stars

seldom do more than shed a few feeble rays about the humble masts of

river sloops and coasting schooners. The greater part of our hardy

seamen, are [7] plowing the ocean in foreign pay; and not a few of

our ingenious shipwrights are now building vessels on alien shores.

Although our increasing agriculture and industry extend and multiply

our productions, yet they constantly diminish in value; and although

we permit all nations to fill our country with their merchandises,

yet their best markets are shut against us. Is there an English, or

a French, or a Spanish island or port in the West-Indies, to which

an American vessel can carry a cargo of flour for sale? Not one. The

Algerines exclude us from the Mediterranean, and adjacent countries;

and we are neither able to purchase, nor to command the free use of

those seas. Can our little towns or larger cities consume the immense

productions of our fertile country? or will they without trade be able

to pay a good price for the proportion which they do consume? The last

season gave a very unequivocal answer to these questions—What numbers

of fine cattle have returned from this city to the country for want

of buyers? What great quantities of salted and other provisions still

lie useless in the stores? To how much below the former price, is our

corn, and wheat and flour and lumber rapidly falling? Our debts remain

undiminished, and the interest on them accumulating—our credit abroad

is nearly extinguished, and at home unrestored—they who had money have

sent it beyond the reach of our laws, and scarcely any man can borrow

of his neighbor. Nay, does not experience also tell us, that it is as

difficult to pay as to borrow? That even our houses and lands cannot

command money—that law suits and usurious contracts abound—that

our farms sell on executions for less than half their value, and that

distress in various forms, and in various ways, is approaching fast to

the doors of our best citizens.

These things have been gradually coming upon us ever since the

peace—they have been perceived and proclaimed, but the universal

rage and pursuit of private gain conspired with other causes, to

prevent any proper efforts being made to meliorate our condition by

due attention to our national affairs, until the late Convention was

convened for that purpose. From the result of their deliberations, the

States expected to derive much good, and should they be disappointed,

it will probably be not less their misfortune than their fault. That

Convention was in general composed of excellent and tried men—men who

had become conspicuous for their wisdom and public services, and whose

names [8] and characters will be venerated by posterity. Generous and

candid minds cannot perceive without pain, the illiberal manner in

which some have taken the liberty to treat them; nor forbear to impute

it to impure and improper motives, zeal for public good, like zeal for

religion, may sometimes carry men beyond the bounds of reason, but it

is not conceivable, that on this occasion, it should find means so to

inebriate any _candid_ American, as to make him forget what he owed to

truth and to decency, or induce him either to believe or to say, that

the almost unanimous advice of the Convention, proceeded from a wicked

combination and conspiracy against the liberties of their country.

This is not the temper with which we should receive and consider

their recommendations, nor the treatment that would be worthy either

of us or them. Let us continue careful therefore that facts do not

warrant historians to tell future generations, that envy, malice and

uncharitableness pursued our patriotic benefactors to their graves, and

that not even pre-eminence in virtue, nor lives devoted to the public,

could shield them from obloquy and detraction. On the contrary, let

our bosoms always retain a sufficient degree of honest indignation to

disappoint and discourage those who expect our thanks or applause for

calumniating our most faithful and meritorious friends.

The Convention concurred in opinion with the people, that a national

government, _competent to every national object_, was indispensibly

necessary; and it was as plain to them, as it now is to all America,

that the present confederation does not provide for such a government.

These points being agreed, they proceeded to consider how and in what

manner such a government could be formed, as on the one hand, should be

sufficiently energetic to raise us from our prostrate and distressed

situation, and on the other be perfectly consistent with the liberties

of the people of every State. Like men to whom the experience of other

ages and countries had taught wisdom, they not only determined that

it should be erected by, and depend on the people; but remembering

the many instances in which governments vested solely in one man, or

one body of men, had degenerated into tyrannies, they judged it most

prudent that the three great branches of power should be committed to

different hands, and therefore that the executive should be separated

from the legislative, and the judicial from both. Thus far the

propriety of their work is easily seen and understood, and therefore is

thus far _almost_ uni- [9] versally approved—for no one man or thing

under the sun ever yet pleased every body.

The next question was, what particular powers should be given to these

three branches? Here the different views and interests of the different

states, as well as the different abstract opinions of their members on

such points, interposed many difficulties. Here the business became

complicated, and presented a wide field for investigation; too wide for

every eye to take a quick and comprehensive view of it.

It is said that “in a multitude of counsellors there is safety,”

because in the first place, there is greater security for probity; and

in the next, if every member cast in only his mite of information and

argument, their joint stock of both will thereby become greater than

the stock possessed by any one single man out of doors. Gentlemen out

of doors therefore should not be hasty in condemning a system, which

probably rests on more good reasons than they are aware of, especially

when formed under such advantages, and recommended by so many men of

distinguished worth and abilities.

The difficulties before mentioned occupied the Convention a long time

and it was not without mutual concessions that they were at last

surmounted. These concessions serve to explain to us the reason why

some parts of the system please in some states, which displease in

others; and why many of the objections which have been made to it,

are so contradictory and inconsistent with one another. It does great

credit to the temper and talents of the Convention, that they were able

so to reconcile the different views and interests of the different

States, and the clashing opinions of their members as to unite with

such singular and almost perfect unanimity in any plan whatever, on a

subject so intricate and perplexed. It shews that it must have been

thoroughly discussed and understood; and probably if the community

at large had the same lights and reasons before them, they would, if

equally candid and uninfluenced, be equally unanimous.

It would be arduous, and indeed impossible, to comprise within the

limits of this address, a full discussion of every part of the plan.

Such a task would require a volume, and few men have leisure or

inclination to read volumes on any subject. The objections made to

it are almost without number, and many of them without reason—some

of them are real and honest, and others merely ostensible. There are

friends to [10] Union and a national Government who have serious

doubts, who wish to be informed, and to be convinced; and there are

others who, neither wishing for union, nor any national Government at

all, will oppose and object to any plan that can be contrived.

We are told, among other strange things, that the liberty of the

press is left insecure by the proposed Constitution, and yet that

Constitution says neither more nor less about it, than the Constitution

of the State of New York does. We are told that it deprives us of trial

by jury, whereas the fact is, that it expressly secures it in certain

cases, and takes it away in none—it is absurd to construe the silence

of this, or of our own constitution, relative to a great number of

our rights, into a total extinction of them—silence and blank paper

neither grant nor take away anything. Complaints are also made that

the proposed constitution is not accompanied by a bill of rights;

and yet they who would make these complaints, know and are content

that no bill of rights accompanied the Constitution of this State. In

days and countries, where Monarchs and their subjects were frequently

disputing about prerogative and privileges, the latter often found it

necessary, as it were to run out the line between them, and oblige the

former to admit by solemn acts, called bills of rights, that certain

enumerated rights belonged to the people, and were not comprehended in

the royal prerogative. But thank God we have no such disputes—we have

no Monarchs to contend with, or demand admission from—the proposed

Government is to be the government of the people—all its officers are

to be their officers, and to exercise no rights but such as the people

commit to them. The Constitution only serves to point out that part

of the people’s business, which they think proper by it to refer to

the management of the persons therein designated—those persons are to

receive that business to manage, not for themselves and as their own,

but as agents and overseers for the people to whom they are constantly

responsible, and by whom only they are to be appointed.

But the design of this address is not to investigate the merits of

the plan, nor of the objections to it. They who seriously contemplate

the present state of our affairs will be convinced that other

considerations of at least equal importance demand their attention. Let

it be admitted that this plan, like everything else devised by man, has

its imperfections: That it does not please every body is certain and

there is little [11] reason to expect one that will. It is a question

of great moment to you, whether the probability of your being able

seasonably to obtain a better, is such as to render it prudent and

advisable to reject this, and run the risque. Candidly to consider this

question is the design of this address.

As the importance of this question must be obvious to every man,

whatever his private opinions respecting it may be, it becomes us all

to treat it in that calm and temperate manner, which a subject so

deeply interesting to the future welfare of our country and prosperity

requires. Let us therefore as much as possible repress and compose

that irritation in our minds, which to warm disputes about it may

have excited. Let us endeavour to forget that this or that man, is on

this or that side; and that we ourselves, perhaps without sufficient

reflection, have classed ourselves with one or the other party. Let

us remember that this is not a matter to be regarded as a matter that

only touches our local parties, but as one so great, so general, and so

extensive in its future consequences to America, that for our deciding

upon it according to the best of our unbiassed judgment, we must be

highly responsible both here and hereafter.

The question now before us now naturally leads to _three_ enquiries:

Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States Published During Its Discussion by the People 1787-1788 · 第 26 / 257 题