AUSTRIAN, RUSSIAN AND TURKISH MANOEUVRES

While Bulgaria came from the San Stefano peace dazzled with jewels

that she was not to clasp, the Serbs continued walking in the shadows

which had, from the time of Michael's death, been gradually falling

round them. No practical result was obtained from a letter which the

Serbian Government ordered their representative to read to the Greek

Patriarch, pointing out that only such parishes should be held as

unquestionably Bulgarian which had formerly been subject to the

Patriarchate of Trnovo, even as those of the Pe['c] Patriarchate were

undoubtedly Serbian, while those of Ochrida were disputable, since

that region had belonged in turn to both of them. Small advantage

accrued to the Serbs from their fidelity to the Greek Patriarch: in

Macedonia they came to be regarded by many Slavs as foes to the new

national Church, while the only desire of the Greeks was to use them

for their own purposes. "There are no Serbs in this parish," wrote a

Bishop when the Patriarch commanded him to permit the Serbian priests

now and then to celebrate a Slav service, "there are no Serbs but

merely Greeks" (in which official terminology the Serbs were included)

"and hellenized Vlachs." ... The Serbs about this time were most

unfortunate in warfare. Prince Milan tried to secure, without coming

to blows, from the Sultan what he expected that his victorious armies

would give him, namely, the administration of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

After the failure of the 1874 crops the peasants of Herzegovina and

then of Bosnia were driven to desperation by the demands of the

tax-gatherers. Miss Irby's eloquent description[56] tells us of the

terrible state of these provinces during the years that preceded the

outbreak. Taxes of one-eighth were demanded by the Governor, one-third

or one-half by the Beg, taxes for exemption from military service,

taxes for pigs, cattle and everything "you have or have not." One

informant said, "I have seen men driven into pigsties and shut up

there in cold and hunger till they paid; hung from the rafters with

their heads downwards in the smoke, until they disclosed where their

little stores were hidden. I have known them hung from trees and water

poured down them in the freezing cold; I have known them chained

barefoot and forced to run behind the Beg's carriage...." The

provinces revolted and vengeance was wrecked upon them. More than a

third of the population fled the country. Sir Arthur Evans[57]

describes the refugees as a "squalid, half-naked swarm of women and

children and old men, with faces literally eaten away with hunger and

disease.... After seeing every moral mutilation," he goes on to say,

"that centuries of tyranny could inflict ... who can go away without a

feeling of despair for the present generation of refugee Bosnia?" The

people of Montenegro and Serbia were profoundly stirred by the

miseries of their brothers. But Milan vacillated, and when finally he

took up arms it was without success, and five weeks after the peace

signature Russia began the Turkish War, one of whose necessary

antecedents was the recognition by Russia that the Austrians were not

to be hampered in Bosnia-Herzegovina. (After the Treaty of Berlin had

placed the two provinces under Austria's administration it is said

that Andrassy, on his return from Berlin, remarked to Francis Joseph

that the door of the Balkans was now open to His Majesty. But the

Russian delegate, Prince Gortchakoff, had prophesied to Andrassy that

Bosnia-Herzegovina would prove the Empire's grave.) One effect

produced by this incursion of the Austrian eagles was a serious

divergence between the Croats and the Serbs. By historic and by ethnic

rights the provinces, so the Serbs argued, should be theirs when once

the Turk had ceased to rule. The Croats, laying special emphasis on

the religious question, were for justifying Austria's occupation. The

Catholic Slav clergy, unlike the Orthodox, ranged themselves with the

great Catholic Power; while Croat politicians of the school of

Star[vc]evi['c] invoked other historic and ethnic sanctions in their

endeavour to found, under the name of "Great Croatia," a State uniting

all the Yugoslav lands of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy. Thus the

Serbs and their Croatian brothers were acutely in conflict. Never,

said the Serbs, would that "Trialism" come to pass, for the Magyars

would veto the formation of a Yugoslav State within the Empire, having

a population roughly equal in numbers to its own. We Yugoslavs have

nothing to hope for, said the Serbs, except from ourselves, and, being

divided, we are ruining our common interests.... From yet another

quarter was a storm-wind blowing on the Serbs. The Russian volunteers

and officers had taken back with them highly unfavourable impressions

as to the capabilities of the Serbian army, which they accompanied in

the luckless campaign of 1876; also, in the opinion of the

Pan-Slavists the Serbs had been contaminated by European civilization,

whereas the Bulgars seemed, in the words of Professor Miliukoff,[58]

to be the sons of an untouched, virgin soil, free from politics and

ready to work, with all possible zeal for the "inner truth" of

Pan-Slavism, while begging its protector to concern herself with the

"outer truth." The Bulgars were, for these reasons, to have the

preference in the allotment of the spoils of the Turkish War; and,

owing to the conflicting demands of Russia and Prince Milan, Serbia

did not declare war against Turkey until several days after the fall

of Plevna, so that she could not hope that the Russians would show any

special tenderness towards her national aspirations. It is difficult

to see what Serbia could have hoped to gain from the elder brother,

if she had been less dilatory; she gained from this intervention no

vast gratitude from the younger brother. Men may still be found in

Bulgarian frontier villages who were prominent there during the

Serbian army's regime. Some of the officers seem to have told the

people that they ought no longer to call themselves Bulgars, since

they were Serbs; but the propaganda was very mild. Serbian schools

were opened here and there, but if no pupils wished to attend them,

the schoolmasters had a holiday; and the occupying troops limited

themselves to collecting signatures on addresses of loyalty to Prince

Milan. No one, probably, thought that the addresses and petitions were

very serious--no one, that is to say, except a Dalmatian publicist

called Spiridon Gop[vc]evi['c], who printed a large number of them in

his handsome, illustrated book, _Makedonien und Alt-Serbien_ (Vienna,

1889). With regard to Gop[vc]evi['c] as a savant--he says that all the

Macedonian Slavs are Serbs--and there are equally uncompromising

Bulgarian authors--the celebrated Slavist Jagi['c] says that he is

sorry for the good paper which was used for Gop[vc]evi['c]'s book.

Another of his wonderful discoveries was that the Macedonian Slavs are

Croats. And one of his severest judges is a Croat, S. Jurini['c]. He

gives, as if they were most valuable, these fatuous lists of

signatures and informs us that some Bulgarian priests and agitators

tried to prevent them being collected. A Turkish official did, it is

true, show in too Oriental a fashion that he disapproved of these

collectors--on July 16, 1878, he quartered one Cvetkovi['c]-Bo[vz]in[vc]e

on the road between Skoplje and Kumanovo for having obtained 5000

signatures; and after quartering him, the Turk nailed the four parts

of his body, each with a quarter of the petition tied to it, on to

four posts at a place where four roads met. But many of the more

reasonable Bulgars appear to have recognized that these activities of

some Serbian officers and others need certainly not embroil the two

people; while some other manifestations of joy, such as when they

pulled out the beard of the priest of Pirot, and after nightfall, in

celebration of this triumph, illuminated the town, those and similar

transactions were treated as the folly of exuberant subalterns; and

Tako Peyeff of Trn, the spokesman of the little, far-away town and

its representative at San Stefano, told me that although he refused to

sign petitions, yet he said that if Prince Milan should visit Trn it

was the duty of all men to salute him. Up to this time, then, there

was no veritable friction--there was only the cloud gathering over

Macedonia; and even when the Berlin Congress of 1879 adjudged certain

towns to Serbia, as a recompense for the abandonment of any claims on

Bosnia, this was rightly taken by most Bulgars as being far less the

fault of Serbia than of Austria and the other Powers. It is strange,

in fact, that this difficult passage in Serbia's history was marked by

greater animus between Serb and Croat than between Serb and

Bulgar--and the Serbs were standing in Bulgaria. Milan had not yet

made his ill-omened remark that the road to Sarajevo went _via_ Sofia.

The Birth of Yugoslavia, Volume 1 · 第 122 / 193 题