The Madrid government, which, since the commencement of the present

year, has constantly provoked petty disturbances, as pretexts for

arbitrarily consigning to the dungeon or the colonies as many as

possible of those they dislike or fear, now find themselves face to

face with a real insurrection of most formidable aspect. They have

cried wolf till the wolf has come, and they run considerable risk

of being devoured. In vain they deny their peril, affect to bluster

and talk big; their real alarm peeps through the flimsy cloak of

bravado. A government confident of its strength, and of the support

and sympathies of the governed, does not condescend to treat and

tamper with rebels. If the insurgents be so contemptible in numbers

and resources as the organs of Narvaez and the Queen-mother daily

assert them to be, why not crush them at once, instead of attempting

to buy over their chiefs, who, on their part, pocket the bribes and

laugh at their seducers? If Cabrera, for weeks together, lay sick

and bedridden in a Catalonian village, why was not a detachment,

or, if necessary, a division, sent to apprehend him? Such flimsy

impostures deceive no one. The truth is, that, with the exception

of a few fortified places, the east of Spain is in the hands of the

Carlists and Progresistas, who come up to the walls of the cities

and levy contributions at the very gates. The north only waits the

signal to burst into revolt; in the Castiles alarming demonstrations

are daily made, and armed bands show themselves on various points; in

the large commercial towns in the south, whose desire for a revision

of the present absurd Spanish tariff renders them ardent liberals,

discontent smoulders, and in an instant may burst into a flame. There

are Andalusian cities where the appearance of Espartero, or of some

other popular and influential Progresista, would at once raise the

entire population. At present, however, the revolt is in its infancy,

and can hardly be said to have begun. Its chiefs avoid encounters,

and busy themselves with organisation--which proceeds rapidly, in

spite of the marches and countermarches of Messrs Cordova, Pavia,

Villalonga, and the other Christino generals, and of the glorious

victories narrated in the columns of the _Heraldo_ and other equally

veracious journals. According to these, Cabrera has already been

several times totally routed and driven over the frontier. We have

strong grounds for believing that, up to this moment,--although

his lieutenants have been engaged in small affrays, of little or no

importance, but terminating, with scarcely an exception, in their

favour--he himself has not smelt powder, burned in anger, since he

left Spain in 1840. He waits the proper moment, when his arrangements

shall be completed, to commence operations upon a large scale; and

meanwhile he very judiciously avoids frittering away his strength in

profitless skirmishes. By the last advices worthy of credit, he is at

the head of six thousand men, well armed and uniformed, and nearly

all old soldiers, in high spirits and thorough discipline. This force

does not include the numerous detached and irregular bands spread

over Catalonia and Valencia, or various bodies of Progresistas, who

march under their own banner, but are on the best of terms with

the Carlists, and will co-operate with them in the day of battle.

Arms and ammunition are procured without difficulty from France

and England. The French Republic has its hands too full to attend

seriously to such trifles. Although General Cavaignac, to get rid

of the importunities of that blatant knave Sotomayor, did order the

arrest of a brace of unlucky Progresistas, there is little chance of

his carrying out the preventive system to a rigorous extent, or of

his depriving the starving French manufacturers of the crust they may

obtain by fabricating arms and clothing for the Carlist troops. As

to England, she is, of course, in no way called upon to prevent the

export of Birmingham muskets and Hounslow cartridges, even should she

suspect their destination to be different from that entered at the

custom-house. Indeed, it is shrewdly suspected that Lord Palmerston

would like nothing better than to see his quondam friends ejected

from Spain, and to resume amicable relations with that country by

accrediting an ambassador to the court of Charles VI.

It is worthy of remark that Cabrera, who made himself so

notorious, during the last civil war in Spain, by his barbarous

cruelties--provoked, but not justified, by his mother's

murder--appears now to have adopted a totally different system,

and to have exchanged his ferocity for moderation and humanity. We

hear of no more cold-blooded shooting of prisoners, or wanton and

unprovoked aggressions; Christino soldiers who have fallen into his

hands, or into those of his subordinates, have been disarmed and

set at liberty; good treatment has been shown to magistrates and

other officials, carried off as hostages or held for ransom. The

contributions levied on the country have been regularised, and are

willingly paid; the peasantry receive the insurgents as liberators,

instead of shunning them as spoilers. Furious at this state of

things, which they can neither alter nor conceal, the Christinos

know not how to show their wrath, or on whom to wreak it; and the

means they resort to for the expression of their spite are perfectly

suicidal. The unfortunate _Constitucional_ of Barcelona, one of

the few remaining papers in Spain which now and then venture to

speak the truth, is arbitrarily suppressed for drawing a faithful

picture of the state of the province; whilst the very next day one

of the government generals confirms the truth of the sketch, and the

disaffection of the peasants, by enforcing the premature gathering

in of the fruits of the earth, to rot and perish in store, and by

forbidding the labourer to carry to the field more than six ounces

of food, lest he should sell or give it to the Carlists--annexing to

these stringent enactments others equally onerous and tyrannical.

All this time, at Madrid and in other cities, arrests continue; and

every day fresh victims are consigned to Ceuta, the Philippines, or

the prisons, their relatives and friends being thenceforward added to

the host of the disaffected. Why, this is stark-staring madness!--the

insanity, preceding perdition, with which God afflicts those he would

destroy. To discomfiture and destruction, total and lasting, the

party still dominant in Spain are to all appearance hastening. None

will pity their fall. They will be condemned not only by all just

men, but by the most reckless advocates of political expediency;

for they have been blind to their own true interests, as well as

unblushingly contemptuous of every principle of morality and good

government.

CONSERVATIVE UNION.

No private calamity which has occurred for years has so startled

the mind of England as the withdrawal of Lord George Bentinck from

the scene of his useful labours. In the prime of life, in the full

possession of a vigorous and masculine intellect, at the head of

a large and increasing political party, who revered him for his

unsullied honour, and loved him for his undaunted courage, he has

been taken from us by one of those mysterious visitations which are

sent as a token that the destinies of the world are indeed in the

hands of God. Short as was his public career, he had won for himself

a name which will not lightly die away in the history of his country,

and his memory will be cherished among us as that of a man who had

the welfare of Britain thoroughly at heart; and who, in an age of

degenerate and vacillating statesmanship, had the firmness to tear

off the mask from the features of hypocrisy, and to expose the awful

consequences of that culpable race for power which has effected the

partial disorganisation of this great and once prosperous empire.

The loss of such a man at such a time is indeed far more a public

than a private calamity. As such, it has been felt throughout the

realm by thousands who understood the true position of Bentinck as

the champion of native industry, and the utter uncompromising foe of

that selfish and sordid system which seeks to aggrandise the few at

the cost of the labouring many. A large proportion even of those who

originally yielded to the deleterious doctrines of the free-traders,

but who, through sad and wholesome experience, had become alive

to the folly and iniquity of the modern scheme, were gathering

confidence from his unremitting exertions, and preparing to rank

themselves by his side. In him the British colonies have lost their

firmest friend and advocate. The noble struggle which he made this

year in behalf of the oppressed and defrauded West Indian planters,

was, in the opinion of many who knew him well, the proximate cause of

his death; for a similar amount of physical and intellectual labour

has hardly ever been undertaken even by a professional man, and never

without the imminent risk of shattering the constitution.

We should ill perform our duty to the public, and to the

constitutional party whose cause we have undeviatingly supported,

if we omitted to take this last sad opportunity of testifying our

respect for the memory of so valuable a man. The tendency of the

present age is to estimate merit by success, and to offer its sole

homage to the winner of the desperate game. But those who look deeper

into the secret springs of human action and impulse, can hardly fail

to recognise in Bentinck a character invested with that rare chivalry

and devotion which, by common consent, we accept as the attribute of

our purest patriots and heroes. Chicanery, deceit, and falsehood were

utterly abhorrent to his mind. He had no taste for those state tricks

which have superseded the old manly English method, and no sympathy

for those who used them. He went into the arena of politics as a

soldier might go to battle, confident in the integrity and justice

of the cause in which he was engaged, and determined to maintain it

to the last against any weight of opposition. It was this resolute

and undaunted spirit which at once raised him from comparative

obscurity to the rank of a great parliamentary leader; for those who

co-operated with him knew well that they were dealing with a man

superior to all intrigue, and ready to lay down his life rather than

infringe, in the slightest degree, on the pledge which he had offered

to his country.

We have no hesitation in saying this, because we are certain that no

one will question the sincerity of our conviction. During the last

two years, and almost without intermission, we have been compelled to

devote a large portion of our space to the consideration of public

questions, and of the political difficulties of the time. On more

than one point our views were seriously opposed to those entertained

and advocated by Lord George Bentinck; nor have we concealed our

opinion that his tactics, however bold, were not the best adapted

for accomplishing the object which we have most warmly at heart, the

reconstitution of the Conservative party upon such clear and defined

principles as may rescue the country from its present perilous

position.

We feel that the necessity of such a union is so plain and

urgent--that the danger of allowing the affairs of Britain to be

longer administered by a feeble but stubborn ministry has been so

clearly demonstrated--that we cannot any longer afford to remain

inactive, or to indulge in idle recrimination. The safety of the

country peremptorily demands the adoption of a different policy, and

the resumption of the reins of government by hands that are capable

of holding them. It is for the gentlemen of England to decide whether

they shall adopt such a course by uniting cordially hand and heart

to retrieve us from our present embarrassments, or sit idly by as

mere spectators of a fatal course of legislation. The present crisis

is by far too serious to be viewed with indifference, or through the

coloured glass of obsolete party interest. The welfare of the empire

is at stake, and that is a subject with which none of us can dare to

dally.

What are the differences which at present separate one section of

the Conservatives from the other? They resolve themselves simply

into the adhesion of a few talented, but we must say obstinate men,

to a leader whose tortuous policy has been the main cause of our

present unhappy position. We have no wish to say hard things even of

Sir Robert Peel. We believe, and devoutly hope, that his reign of

office is over, and that no combination of circumstances may occur

to bring him back, even for the shortest period, into power; and,

believing and hoping this, we are content to let him alone, and leave

him to the judgment of that posterity which he is so peculiarly

prone to invoke. But we ask those who have clung with such extreme

tenacity to his cause, seriously to view the effect of the late

legislative measures upon the community at large--to consider how

far the result of the free-trade scheme has corresponded with the

nature of its promise--and to reflect upon the present precarious

state of our oldest and most valuable dependencies. We blame no

one for having entertained an opinion conscientiously differing

from our own. There may not be any disgrace in having, consented

to an experiment which, when put into practice, has resulted in an

absolute failure; but there is disgrace, ay, and infinite dishonour,

in refusing to acknowledge an error when its consequences are made

palpably manifest, and in persisting to gloss it over for the sake of

an egotistical consistency. We do not believe that high-minded and

honourable men will be guilty of such vain and frivolous conduct; and

it is in that belief that we make our present most urgent appeal.

Look at the effect of our present free-trade laws, not only upon

the revenue, but upon the internal industry of Britain. Is it not

clear and utterly beyond dispute, that our exports, for which we

have sacrificed every thing, are greatly on the decline, and that

our imports are steadily increasing? Not even the merest tyro in

political science,--not even the dullest dolt that clamoured at

the meetings of the League,--will venture to affirm that this is a

state of things which can continue without entailing ruin on the

country; and yet the Whigs, with that insensibility and sottishness

which is as much their characteristic as obstinacy, have announced

for next session their intention of pushing the experiment further!

For a year, we have had no budget, a circumstance entirely without

a parallel in parliamentary history. The excess of the national

expenditure above the revenue has been stated at the enormous sum

of a million and a half, though we believe that in reality three

millions would not cover the deficiency; and a considerable item even

of that revenue is to be cut off from us, when the act repealing

the corn law shall come into full operation. We cannot look for any

improvement in trade whilst we leave our markets open to the produce

of foreign labour, and allow the wealthy classes to be supplied

with almost all their articles of consumption from an unremunerating

source. We must again look to the customs as our main source of

revenue, and more than that, as our absolute salvation from the

anarchy which must ensue, if the hundred small non-exporting trades

of the country are to be sacrificed for the monopoly of the few, and

the millions engaged in these pursuits made beggars and driven to

desperation.

And what is the state of the monopoly? How have the manufacturers

gained? Let FOUR MILLIONS of diminished exports _on the half year_

only, and the suppression of the Manchester return of the number of

unemployed operatives in the very metropolis of the League, be the

reply. Yes--it has come to this pass, that the free-traders DARE

not publish to the world the results of their own madness. In the

month of June last, there were within a fraction of EIGHT THOUSAND

workmen without employment in Manchester alone, and the numbers were

increasing so fast, that it was deemed expedient to discontinue

the startling return. How can we be surprised that Chartism and

disaffection are rankling in men's minds, when we take such

deliberate pains to make them paupers?

We are told that the state of the Continent is such that our export

market is impeded. Let us for the moment admit that such is the

case, and let us see what sort of argument that furnishes for the

continuance of the present system. Is it deliberately proposed that

we are to remain with our ports open, until France and Germany, and

Spain and Italy, are tranquillised? Are the prophets of peace still

so sanguine of the speedy realisation of their visions? Are we to

wait for years--with an increasing debt, a diminished revenue, and

still further stagnation of employment--until our brethren on the

other side of the Channel have reconciled their jarring theories of

Red Republics and of unity, adjusted their boundaries, and again

betaken themselves to the arts of peace? Our own constitution may

well be shattered before that consummation can arrive! But the truth

is, that, in many respects, the Continental disturbances are not

unfavourable to our export trade. If, on the one hand, they have

occasioned a less degree of consumption; on the other, they have

paralysed industry and depreciated capital abroad. Belgium, it is

true, is a formidable competitor for our staples in the foreign

market; but, notwithstanding, we do not expect any serious diminution

in this branch of our foreign trade. The evil of which we complain

is chronic, and it has not been caused by any sudden or violent

convulsions.

It is to our colonies that we must look for the cause of our

diminished exports. It was our paramount duty and obligation to

have fostered these, and to have made them, by a wise system of

reciprocity, at once the best supporters of our power, and the most

sure and steady consumers of our manufactured produce. We have done

nothing of this. On the contrary, the course which we have thought

proper to pursue towards those integral portions of the empire has

been marked by tyranny and injustice. We have ruined the West Indies,

and yet we wonder why they do not consume our cottons! Our weak and

ridiculous legislation, without foresight and without principle,

has not only retarded the progress of the colonies, but absolutely

frightened them out of our market; and unless a very different system

is speedily adopted, we may have bitter occasion to rue our folly,

and to curse the selfishness of the men who, from mere lust of

personal power, have sacrificed the best interests of the nation.

How, then, have the manufacturers gained by free trade? On the one

hand, they have not been able, by inviting and giving every facility

to imports, to increase the quantity of their export; on the other,

they have closed up several of their surest markets. The full extent

of our egregious folly has not yet become visible to the public. The

manufacturers, by a sort of retributive justice, are the persons

who are feeling it the most, and ere long they will be compelled to

acknowledge it. It is seriously affecting the trade and commerce

of our greatest cities. The number of vessels which have cleared

out of the Clyde from the port of Glasgow during the last nine

months, is in the proportion of 382 to 602 for the same period in

the previous year! Glasgow, as every one knows, owed its rise and

opulence to its connexion with the colonies, more especially the West

Indies; and here is the heaviest blow which probably was ever heard

of in the history of commerce, struck, through free trade, at the

second city of Britain. It is good that we should know these things;

better if, by revolving them, we can turn experience to advantage.

Let the electors throughout the kingdom, more especially in the

towns, meditate seriously before they are again called on to use

their political franchise; let them reflect on their own diminished

prosperity, and beware of that hollow liberalism combined with

quackery which is the stain and the curse of the age.

To this position we have been brought by a bad commercial policy,

originated by mean and mercenary men, and most unhappily adopted

by a minister who became a convert towards the close of a long

official life. We have seen and felt the system as it works; and

the only question now for our consideration is, whether we are to

suffer it to endure? If we do so, it is vain to deny that we are on

the verge of general ruin. There is not a symptom of improvement.

Day by day the cry of distress waxes louder, and yet we hesitate to

take the necessary steps for effecting our own emancipation. There

is hardly one man in the country--the bailie of Blairgowrie perhaps

excepted--who can have, or feels, the slightest confidence in the

abilities of Lord John Russell. Such a cabinet as this, in point of

political decrepitude and imbecility, was never yet formed; and it

could not live for an hour save for the unseemly dissensions in the

Conservative camp. These cannot be permitted to last. There is no

merit in personal devotion when pushed beyond its proper sphere; and

the best service which Sir Robert Peel can render to his sovereign,

is utterly to abjure all pretension of ever returning to power.

Surely he can have no wish to head a reactionary movement, or expose

himself to the obloquy of recanting the last edition of his views.

There is another reason why the Conservatives are imperatively called

upon to unite. Recent disclosures of a very startling nature have

forced upon us the conviction, that the Whigs are worse than weak,

and that they cannot be depended on as steadfast guardians of the

crown. There is more in the famous letter written by Mr Thomas Young,

formerly private secretary to Lord Melbourne, than meets the eye.

We attach no undue importance to this epistle--we shall not stoop

so low as to examine the motives and intention of its author. His

own attempted explanation is, if possible, more damning than the

treasonable missive itself. We could only, were we to exhaust our

whole powers of illustration, repeat what has been already stated

in the masterly article of the _Standard_. It is as clear as day,

that at the time of the passing of the Reform Bill, the underlings

of the Whig administration were cognisant of a hideous project for a

violent and bloody revolution, and that, to take the mildest point

of view, they concealed that knowledge from their masters. Franks

were obtained _from the Home Office_, for the purpose of suborning

the loyalty of at least one officer, high in his Majesty's service,

and proposing to him the odious part of a leader in a popular

insurrection. Whether that letter, written as it probably was in

the fullest confidence, ought or ought not to have seen the light,

especially after the lapse of so many years, is a matter with which

we have no concern. That is a question which is only personal to

Mr Young and his correspondent; but we have the document, and the

whole nation is entitled to inquire into its tenor. And never, upon

any accusation of so grave a nature, was a more miserable defence

preferred. In fact there can be, and there is, no escape from the

legitimate conclusion. At that time a section of the Whigs were

ready, for the sake of carrying their own scheme, not only to have

connived at, but to have lent their whole influence to a popular

outbreak and rising, which might, in all human probability, have been

subversive of the constitution of the country. Lord Melbourne might

not have known of that letter: we go farther, and state our positive

opinion that he was utterly ignorant of its existence, because,

however we may have differed from him in politics, he is a man whose

personal honour and loyalty have always been free from a stain. We

believe--and are glad in stating it--that he was utterly ignorant

of the vile treason which was hatching in his own department; but

we shall not extend the same shelter of belief to others of his

unpatriotic party. That treason was meditated is plain; and very

thankful shall we be if the higher order of the Whigs shall take the

pains, by disavowing and repudiating the acts of their subordinates,

and by withdrawing from those implicated the unmerited rewards

of their sedition, to clear themselves from the heavy suspicion

which this document undoubtedly affixes on their loyalty. It is a

disclosure too grave to be met with a light explanation. The fact of

meditated treason, known to Whig officials, has transpired, and we

are entitled to know how far upwards the rank contagion had spread.

That letter, apart from its historical value, is important at the

present moment, inasmuch as we think that no one can peruse it

without feeling convinced that, in any struggle for power, the Whigs

would have no scruple in sacrificing principle to their interest.

They have done so already repeatedly, and their tactics have always

been to retain or recover office by making large concessions to

the demands of the Radical or the Irish party. We are not without

apprehension that they are, even now, contemplating some move of a

similar nature, to be made during the ensuing session of Parliament,

for the purpose of retrieving some portion of their lost popularity.

The Radical party have openly threatened to withdraw their support

from the ministry unless some increase of the suffrage shall be

granted; and an agitation to that effect would be particularly

palatable to the free-traders, as it might tend, in some degree,

to draw public attention from the utter failure of their schemes.

Any movement, in such a direction, would be followed by the most

disastrous consequences. A further infusion of the popular element

into the House of Commons, would simply lead to greater encroachments

on the constitution, more reckless experiments upon the stability

of our trade and commerce, and more culpable bidding by ministries

for popularity in every shape. Where is to be the end of such an

agitation--unless, indeed, we were to follow the notable examples

of France and Germany, and adopt universal suffrage--if, on each

occasion when the country is suffering under the pressure of noxious

laws, no mode of relief can be suggested, save through an extension

of the Reform Bill? We should have thought that the success of the

first experiment was not quite so conspicuous as to invite another

of the same nature. The impudence of the Radical faction is really

almost incredible. Mr Cobden and his confederates have got free

trade, from the effects of which we are presently languishing; and

they now propose to revive our spirits and replenish our purses by

stocking the House of Commons with an additional importation of men

of precisely the same caste and opinions as their own! We suspect

that the funds would scarce be lively if the country were assured

that forty Brights, instead of one, were seated in our National

Assembly.

We therefore again implore the Conservatives to unite without loss

of time, since in their hands alone can we have a thorough guarantee

for the safety of the crown, the stability of the national churches,

and for the integrity of the constitution. Let all lukewarmness, all

promptings of personal ambition, all latent rancour, and all absurd

and unreciprocated confidence, be given to the winds at once; and let

us seriously and diligently apply ourselves to the task of recalling

to Britain and her colonies that measure of prosperity which we

possessed before evil counsels prevailed, and which, even now, is not

beyond our power to recall. The industrious classes of the community,

impoverished and straitened as they have been, have a right to this

service from the high-minded gentlemen of England. The power and the

ability are with us, if we only testify the disposition; and surely

it is madness to remain at idle feud while the enemy are visible at

the gate.

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 64, No. 397, November 1848 · 第 20 / 21 段