CHAPTER XV.

FRENCH COLLECTORS--NAUDÉ TO RENOUARD.

Gabriel Naudé was a Doctor of Medicine, and held an appointment at one

time as physician in ordinary to Louis XIII. But even as a student he

manifested that passion for books which furnished the real occupation of

his life. Before taking his degree at Padua he was librarian to Henri de

Mesmes, and afterwards to Cardinal Bagni at Rome. On his patron's death

he was placed in charge of the great library which Cardinal Barberini was

establishing in his palace in the Piazza of the Quattro Fontane. Some

part of his time was spent in collecting books for Cardinal Richelieu,

who offered Naudé the charge of his library in 1642; but, the Cardinal

having died in that year, Naudé transferred his services to Mazarin. He

inspired his employer with the desire of emulating the magnificence of

Barberini and the patriotic generosity of Borromeo; and the librarian's

keen scent for books and minute knowledge of their values were

thenceforth utilised in the work of creating the _Bibliothèque Mazarine_.

Richelieu had done things on a grand scale. He had confiscated to his own

use the whole town-library at La Rochelle; and Naudé was anxious that

Mazarin's great undertaking should begin with an acquisition _en bloc_. A

provincial governor named Simeon Dubois had made a collection in the

Limousin. His books had passed into the hands of Jean Descordes, a Canon

of Limoges, who died in 1642 possessed of about 6000 volumes. Naudé

prepared the catalogue, and persuaded the Cardinal to purchase the whole

property by private contract. A few months afterwards the King gave him

the State Papers collected by Antoine de Loménie. A great number of

printed books were added under Naudé's superintendence, and in a short

time the new library was opened to the public. Its regulations were

framed in a very liberal spirit, as may be learned from the first of

Naudé's rules: 'The library is to be open to all the world without the

exception of any living soul; readers will be supplied with chairs and

writing-materials, and the attendants will fetch all books required in

any language or department of learning, and will change them as often as

is necessary.'

In reviewing the condition of the other great libraries, Naudé pointed

out that there was nothing like an unrestrained admission except at the

Bodleian, the Ambrosian, and the Angelica Library at Rome. The public had

no rights at the Vatican, or the Laurentian, or the Library of St. Mark

at Venice. It was just the same at Bologna, or Naples, or in the Duchy of

Urbino. The same thing, he said, might be seen in other countries.

Ximènes built a fine library at Alcalà, and there was a collection of

the books of Nuñez at Salamanca; there were the Rantzaus at Copenhagen

and the Fuggers at Augsburg; they had done everything for the use of

scholars except making the libraries free. The French themselves had the

King's Library, a vast accumulation at St. Victor's, and a rich bequest

from De Thou; but the use of all this wealth of books was hampered by the

most complicated restrictions. We can see that he was rejoicing in his

own good work while he praised the stately Ambrosiana. 'Is it not

astonishing,' he asks, 'that any one can go in when he likes, and stay as

long as he cares to look about or to read or make extracts? All that he

has to do is to sit at a desk and ask for any book that he wishes to

study.'

For some years after the new library was established Naudé travelled in

quest of books over the greater part of Europe. He said that he would

have ransacked Spain if Mazarin had not preferred an invasion by the

regular army. He was the 'familiar spirit' of the auction-room, and it

became a by-word that a visit from the great book-hunter was as bad as a

storm in the book-shops. He boasted in his epigrams of exploits in

Flanders, in Switzerland, and among the Venetian book-stalls. At Rome he

bought books by the fathom; he skimmed the German shelves, and passed

over into England to relieve the islanders of their riches. At Lyons he

met Marshal Villeroi, who gave him a great portion of the books which

Cardinal de Tournon had bequeathed to the Jesuits. We trace the result

of his travels in his description of the libraries of Europe. Certain

subjects, as he said, are in vogue at particular places, and we ought

always to notice the book-fashions to show our respect for the feelings

of mankind. 'For positive science we go to Rome or Florence or Naples,

and for jurisprudence to Paris or Milan; France supplies us with history;

and if we wanted scholastic lore we might go to Spain, or the colleges of

Oxford and Cambridge.'

In 1647 the Mazarine Library contained about 45,000 volumes, and Naudé in

his joy proclaimed it as the eighth wonder of the world. The Parisians

appeared to be delighted with the superb Loménie MSS. and the crowd of

bright volumes in the Cardinal's ordinary livery. But in 1651 the

Parliament got the upper hand of the 'Red Tyrant' in one of the unmeaning

struggles of the Wars of the Fronde; the property of Mazarin was

confiscated for a time, and the library was put up for sale. The list of

Commissioners included the respectable names of Alexandre Pétau and

Pierre Pithou; yet we are assured that the auction resembled a massacre,

and that hardly any obstacle was placed in the way of the most impudent

thefts. Naudé in vain petitioned against a decree which had fallen like a

thunder-bolt on the 'wonderful work of his life.' 'Why will you not save

this daughter of mine, this library that is the fairest and best-endowed

in the world? Can you permit the public to be deprived of such a precious

and useful treasure? Can you endure that this fair flower, which spreads

its perfume through the world, should wither as you hold it in your

hands?'

Naudé spent his own small fortune in ransoming the books on medicine. He

had worked hard to persuade Queen Christina to purchase the whole

collection; but when it came to the point she only bought a few MSS.

which were afterwards returned. The 'Pallas of the North,' was interested

in Naudé's misfortunes. She invited him to take charge of the Royal

Library at Stockholm, and here he rested for a while. He made

acquaintance in Sweden with several celebrated men of letters; Descartes

was a guest at the Court, and used to be ready to begin his metaphysical

discourses at day-break. Naudé on one occasion delighted the young Queen

by stepping a Greek dance with Professor Meibomius, who was just at that

time bringing out his work upon the music of the ancients. The climate,

or the excitement of that vivacious Court, began to disagree with Naudé's

health; he resigned his appointment and returned to France, but died at

Abbeville on his way to Paris, a few months before his patron's return to

power. When the public library was established again the Cardinal

purchased Naudé's private collection of 8000 books; and care was taken to

preserve them apart, as a mark of distinction, in a gallery named after

the famous librarian.

The hereditary collections of Colbert and La Moignon were as much

indebted to their librarians as the Mazarine to the labours of Naudé.

The Minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert was as celebrated for his books as for

his finance: but the magnificence of the library was mainly due to its

guardian Calcavi and his successor the venerable Baluze. Colbert's

manuscripts are believed to have been the most valuable ever amassed by a

person of private fortune. Among their eight thousand volumes were the

choicest treasures from St. Martin's Abbey at Metz, including the _Book

of Hours_ used by Charles the Great, and a Bible said to have been

illuminated for Charles the Bald. There were about 50,000 printed books,

almost all well-bound; and it was thought that the choicest Levantine

moroccos had been secured for the Minister by an article in a treaty with

the Sultan. Colbert died in 1683, and the library remained in his family

for half a century afterwards. In 1728 the Marquis de Seignelaye sold the

books, and began to sell a portion of the manuscripts; the world was

alarmed at the idea of a general dispersion; the remaining manuscripts,

however, were offered to Louis XV.; and there was great rejoicing when he

wrote '_Bon, 300,000 livres_' on the letter received from the Marquis.

The other famous library was amassed by 'an extraordinary family of

book-collectors.' It was begun by Guillaume de la Moignon, who was

President of the Parliament of Paris in 1658. His son Chrétien de la

Moignon was as zealous a book-buyer as his father, and he secured the

renown of their library by engaging the services of Adrien Baillet.

Dibdin quoted passages from Baillet's biography that show the tenderness

with which the family treated his 'crazy body and nervous mind': 'Madame

La Moignon and her son always took a pleasure in anticipating his wishes,

soothing his irritabilities, promoting his views, and speaking loudly and

constantly of the virtues of his head and heart.' Baillet in his turn

gave to his employers the credit of his best literary work. 'It was done

for you,' he wrote, 'and in your house, and by one who is ever yours to

command.' The library was much enlarged by its owner in the third

generation; and by its union with the collection of M. Berryer, who died

in 1762, it became 'one of the most splendid in Europe.' It was dispersed

during the troubles of the Revolution, and a great portion was brought to

London in 1791; but the works on jurisprudence were reserved, and were

sold in Paris a few years afterwards.

David Ancillon is perhaps best known as the defender of Luther and

Calvin. But according to Bayle he was an indefatigable book-collector,

and notable for having set the fashion of buying books in the first

edition. Most people thought, said D'Israeli, that the first edition was

only an imperfect essay, 'which the author proposes to finish after

trying the sentiments of the literary world.' Bayle was on the side of

Ancillon. There are cases, as he remarked, in which the second edition

has never appeared; and at any rate the man who waits for the reprint

shows 'that he loves a pistole better than knowledge.' Ancillon,

however, always indulged himself with 'the most elegant edition,'

whatever the first might have been; he considered that 'the less the eyes

are fatigued in reading or work the more liberty the mind feels in

judging of it.' It is easier to detect the merits in print than in

manuscript: 'and so we see them more plainly in good paper and clear type

than when the impression and paper are bad?' Some have thought it better

to have many editions of a good book: 'among other things,' says our

critic, 'we feel great satisfaction in tracing the variations.' Ancillon

was naturally accused of an indiscriminate mania for collecting; and he

confessed that he was to some extent infected with the 'book-disease.' It

was said that he never left his books day or night, except when he went

to preach to his humble congregation. He was convinced that some golden

thought might be found in the dullest work. Ancillon remained in France

as long as his religion was tolerated. He found a home across the Rhine

after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes; but from that time he had to

be content with German editions, all his fine tall volumes having been

destroyed by the 'Catholic' rioters at Metz.

If Evelyn can be believed, the art of book-collecting had come to a very

poor pass in France about the seventeenth century. It had been discovered

that certain classes of books were the necessary furniture of every

gentleman's library. If a man of quality built a mansion he would expect

to find a book-room and a quantity of shelves; it was a simple matter

further on to order so many yards of folios or octavos, all in red

morocco, with the coat of arms stamped in gold. Such collections, said La

Bruyère, are like a picture-gallery with a strong smell of leather: the

owner is most polite in showing off 'the gold leaves, Etruscan bindings,

and fine editions'; 'we thank him for his kindness, but care as little as

himself to visit the tan-yard which he calls his library.' We must not

forget the financier Bretonvilliers, who about the year 1657 determined

to become a bibliophile, and so far succeeded that some of his local

books on Lorraine were purchased for the National Library. He first built

a Hôtel, not far from the Cathedral of Notre-Dame, with a large gallery

in which with infinite pains he built up a magnificent book-case; the

contents were of less importance; but he succeeded after a time in

filling it with books stamped with his new device of an eagle holding the

olive-branch.

One or two of the more serious collectors may be noticed before we pass

to the great age of Rothelin and La Vallière. Henri du Bouchet had

gathered about eight thousand books, all very well chosen, according to

the testimony of the Père Jacob; on his death in 1654 he bequeathed them

to the Abbey of St. Victor on public trusts so that those who came after

him might find a solace in what had been 'his dearest delight.' He

requested that they might be free to students for three days in the week

and for seven hours in the day; and his wishes were duly regarded until

the great library of St. Victor was dispersed in 1791. The monks set up a

tablet and bust in memory of the generous donor; and perceiving that the

volumes were not emblazoned in the usual way they adopted the singular

plan of inserting pieces of leather bearing his arms into holes cut in

the ancient bindings.

The Abbé Boisot was another of the scholars who lived entirely for books.

While quite a young man he acquired a considerable library in his travels

through Spain and Italy; and in 1664, during an official visit to

Besançon, he was so fortunate as to acquire the MSS. of the Cardinal de

Granvelle, who had been the confidential minister of the Emperor Charles

V. Boisot wrote a delightful account of the adventures through which this

collection had passed. 'At first,' he says, 'the servants used what they

pleased, and then the neighbours' children helped themselves; when some

packing-cases were wanted, the butler, to show his economy, sold the

records contained in them to a grocer.' At last they were all tired of

these 'useless old papers,' and determined to throw them away. Jules

Chifflet, according to Guigard, was the means of saving the remainder. He

examined a number of the documents and recognised their importance,

though they were mostly in cipher; but he died before they could be

sorted out. Boisot bought what he could from the heirs, and found a good

many more MSS. in the neighbourhood. They passed with the rest of

Boisot's books to the Abbey of St. Vincent at Besançon; and during the

Revolution the whole collection became the property of the citizens and

was transferred to the public library.

The hereditary treasures of the Bouhier family were dispersed in the same

way through several provincial libraries. The collection had begun in the

reign of Louis XII., and something had been done in each generation

afterwards by way of adding fine books and manuscripts. Étienne Bouhier

had collected in all parts of Italy. Jean Bouhier in 1642 bought the

accumulations of Pontus de Thyard, the learned Bishop of Châlons. His

father's own library had been dispersed among his children; but Jean

Bouhier succeeded in getting it together again, and added a large number

of MSS. which he had gathered for the illustration of the history of

Burgundy. The library became still more famous in the time of his

grandson the President Jean Bouhier, who has been admired as the type of

the true bibliophile. The bibliomaniac heaps up books from avarice or

some animal instinct; he is a collector, it is said, 'without intelligent

curiosity.' Bouhier used to read his books and make notes upon them; and

it is said that he carried the practice to such excess as to deface with

marginal scribblings the finest work of Henri Estienne and Antoine

Vérard. A visitor to his library described the sober magnificence of the

rosewood shelves with silken hangings in which the rare editions and

long rows of manuscripts were ranged. In the next generation there was a

startling change. The library had been left to Bouhier's son-in-law,

Chartraire de Bourbonne: the grave offspring of Aldus and Gryphius found

themselves in company with poets of the _talon rouge_ and muses of the

_Opéra bouffe_. When the gay De Bourbonne died, the ill-assorted crowd

passed to his son-in-law in his turn, and was transferred in 1784 to the

Abbey of Clairvaux.

We cannot name or classify the bibliophiles of the eighteenth century. It

would be endless to describe them with the briefest of personal notes;

how M. Barré loved out-of-the-way books and fugitive pieces, or Lambert

de Thorigny a good history, or how Gabriel de Sartines, the policeman of

the Parc aux Cerfs, had a marvellous collection about Paris. When Count

Macarthy sold his books at Toulouse his catalogue contained a list of

about ninety others, issued in the same century, from which his riches

were derived. We can point to a few of the mightiest Nimrods. We see the

serene Gaignat pass, and the bustling La Vallière; the Duc d'Estrées is

recognised as a busy book-hunter, and there are the physicians Hyacinthe

Baron and Falconnet whose keenness no prey could escape. We can

distinguish the forms of the elegant '_bibliomanes_' to whom their books

were as pictures or as jewels to be enclosed in a shrine; there is Count

d'Hoym with a house full of treasures, and Boisset and Girardot de

Préfond with their cabinets of marvels. If the crowds in the

old-fashioned libraries are like the multitude at Babel, these tall

volumes in crushed morocco and 'triple gold bands' remind us of what our

antiquaries have said of books glimmering in their wire cases 'like

eastern beauties peering through their jalousies.' We ought to say

something of M. de Chamillard, best known in his public capacity as a

good match for the King at billiards and as the minister who proposed the

revocation of the Edict of Nantes. In private life Michael de Chamillard

was a virtuoso with well-filled galleries and portfolios; and he had

assembled a large company of books of fashionable appearance. But our

real interest is not so much with the Minister of Billiards, as M. Uzanne

described him, but rather with his wife and three daughters, who were all

true female bibliophiles. The eldest daughter, the Marquise de Dreux, was

wife of the Grand Master of the Ceremonies; but though his collection was

gay and polite the Marquise insisted on a separate establishment for the

books that she had discovered and bought and bound. The Duchesse de la

Feuillade and the Duchesse de Lorges insisted, like their elder sister,

on having libraries for their separate use. The minister's wife was

celebrated for the splendour of her books, and marvellous prices have

been paid for specimens of her earlier style. But 'little Madame de

Chamillard' attached herself in all things to the Maintenon, and followed

the uncrowned queen in abandoning the paths of vanity; she gave up the

world, so far as gilt arabesques and crushed morocco were concerned, and

dressed all her later acquisitions _à la Janséniste_, in plain leather

with perhaps the thinnest line of blind-tooling for an ornament.

Charles du Fay was a captain in the Guards, compelled by his misfortunes

to confine himself to the battles of the book-sale. He lost a leg at the

bombardment of Brussels in 1695; and though he was promoted to a company

in the Guards, it became at last apparent that he could not serve on

horseback. Du Fay, we are told, was fortunately fond of literature; and

he devoted himself with eagerness to the task of collecting a magnificent

library. History and Latin poetry had always been his favourite subjects,

and it appears that he was already collecting fine examples in this

department during his campaigns in Germany and Flanders.

M. de Lincy commemorates the good taste that impelled Du Fay to buy

several of Grolier's books, and records the industry with which he sought

to remedy his defects of education. Professor Brochard, he says, was a

learned man, with a good library of his own, who went to inspect the

books gathered by Du Fay from all parts of Europe. The visitor expressed

surprise that out of nearly four thousand volumes there should hardly be

any in Greek. 'I have hardly retained a word of the language,' said Du

Fay. 'Cato in his old age,' replied the Professor, 'did not hesitate for

a moment to learn it; and a person quite ignorant of Greek can never know

Latin well.' Du Fay was an easy good-natured man, and at once followed

his friend's advice, beginning from that day to buy Greek books and to

work at the language so as to be able to read them. His object, however,

in forming a library was not so much to gather useful information as to

set up a museum of literary rarities. The idea is in accordance with our

modern taste, and perhaps with the common sense of mankind; but some of

the old-fashioned collectors were angry with the poor epicure of

learning. The Président Bouhier writes to Marais in 1725 on seeing a

catalogue of the library: 'This savours more of bibliomania than

scholarship.' Marais at once replied: 'Your judgment on Du Fay's

catalogue is most excellent: it is not a library, but a shop full of

curious book-specimens, made to sell and not to keep for one's self.'

Many of Du Fay's books were bought by Count d'Hoym, who lived for many

years at Paris as ambassador from Augustus of Poland and Saxony. The

Count has been accused of showing bad manners at Court, and of bad faith

in giving the trade secrets of Dresden to the factory at Sèvres; in

bibliography at any rate, he was supreme among the amateurs, and his

White Eagle of Poland appears upon no volume that is not among the best

of its kind. He sat at one time at the feet of the Abbé de Rothelin; but

he soon became his master's equal in matters of taste, and was accepted

until his exile at Nancy as the arbiter of elegance among the Parisians.

M. Guigard quotes from the dedication of a 'treasury' of French poetry a

passage that indicates his high position: 'To the poets in this

assemblage, whoever they be, it is a glory, Monseigneur, to enter your

Excellency's library, so full, so magnificent, so well chosen, that it is

justly accounted the prodigy of learning.'

Charles d'Orléans, Abbé de Rothelin, had died in 1744, when most of his

books became the property of the nation. In some respects he was the most

distinguished of the book-collectors. His learning and wealth enabled him

to make a collection of theology that has never been surpassed; and he

had the good fortune to acquire the vast series of State Papers and the

priceless mediæval MSS. collected by Nicolas Foucault. His special taste

was for immaculate editions in splendid bindings; but nothing escaped his

notice that was in any way remarkable or interesting.

Paul Girardot de Préfond was a timber-merchant who fell into an apathetic

state on retiring from active business. His physician, Hyacinthe Baron,

was an eminent book-collector, and he advised the patient to take up the

task of forming a library. So successful was the prescription that the

merchant became renowned during the next half century for his superb

bindings, his specimens from Grolier's stores, and the Delphin and

Variorum classics which he procured from the library of Gascq de la

Lande. On two occasions the sale of his surplus treasures made an

excitement for the literary world. Some of his rarest books were sold in

1757, and twelve years afterwards his Delphin series and the greater part

of his general collection were purchased by Count Macarthy.

Mérard de St. Just was another collector, whose exquisite taste is still

gratefully remembered, though his small library has long been dispersed,

and was indeed almost destroyed by a series of accidents before the

outbreak of the great Revolution. 'My library,' he said, 'is very small,

but it is too large for me to fill it with good books.' He would not have

the first editions of the classics, because they were generally printed

on bad paper which it was disagreeable to touch, with the exception of

works produced by the Aldine Press. Nor would he buy mere curiosities,

says Guigard, but left them to persons who cared for empty display, 'like

one who proudly exhibits his patents of nobility without being able to

point to any distinguished action of his ancestors.' He was the owner of

many choice books that had belonged to Gaignat and Charron de Ménars, or

had been bound for Madame de Pompadour, or to the undiscriminating Du

Barry. In 1782, we are told, he despatched the best part of his library

to America, but had the grief of learning soon afterwards that they had

been captured at sea by the English. His philosophical temper was shown

in his reply to the bad news: 'I have but one wish upon the subject; I

hope that the person who gets this part of the booty will be able to

comprehend the value of the treasure that has come to his hands.'

The elder Mirabeau was a collector of another type. The 'friend of

mankind' intended to gather together the best and largest library in the

world. He cared nothing for the scarcity or the external adornments of a

volume; but he had a huge appetite for knowledge, and he longed to have

the means of referring to all that could illustrate the progress of the

race. He did not live to attain any marked success in his gigantic

design; but his library had at least the distinction of containing all

the books of the Comte de Buffon, enriched with marginal notes in the

naturalist's handwriting.

A modest collection was formed a few years afterwards by Pierre-Louis

Guinguené, who wrote a valuable work on the literary history of Italy. He

is remembered as having published amid the terrors of 1791 an amusing

essay on the authority of Rabelais 'in the matter of this present

Revolution.' He led a peaceful life through all that troubled time, and

succeeded in forming a very useful library containing about 3000 volumes;

it was purchased for the British Museum on his death, and became the

foundation of the great series of works on the French Revolution which

has been brought together there.

The long life of M. Antoine Renouard bridges over the space between the

days of Mirabeau and the time when the _élégants_ of the Third Empire had

invented a new bibliomania. Renouard had ordered bindings from the elder

Derôme; in 1785 he bought a book at La Vallière's sale. In his

_Epictetus_ there is the following note: 'Bought in May 1785, the first

book printed on vellum that entered my library; rather luxurious for a

young fellow of seventeen, but then all my little savings were devoted to

acquiring books; parties of pleasure, and elegancies of toilette,

everything was sacrificed to my beloved books; and at that time a brisk

and brilliant business permitted expenses which were followed by hard

years of privation; it was in my first youth that I found it easiest to

spend money on my books.' Renouard began life as a manufacturer. His

father made gauze stuffs, and kept a shop in the Rue Apolline. In 1787

the Abbé le Blond, the librarian of the Collège Mazarin, heard that

Molini had sold a fine Aldine Horace to a shopkeeper. 'The next day,'

says Renouard, 'Le Blond came into my library. "Oh! I shall not have the

book," he exclaimed, and when I looked round, he said, "I beg your

pardon, I hoped to tempt you with a few _louis_ for your bargain, but I

have given up the idea at once, and I only ask the double favour of

seeing the book and of being allowed to make your acquaintance."'

Renouard was the historian of the House of Aldus, and naturally became

the possessor of some of Grolier's finest books. During his career as a

bookseller he parted with most of them; and at the sale of his library in

1854 the 'Lucretius,' the 'Virgil,' and the 'Erasmus,' were all that

remained in his collection.

The Great Book-Collectors · 第 15 / 16 章