I do not care what the French think, I said with warmth.

But they are our Allies, said my friend severely. The Germans, on the other

hand, prefer dogs. I hope you are not a pro-German.

On the cat-and-dog issue I am, and I don't care who knows it, I said

recklessly. And I hate these attempts to drag in prejudice. Moreover, I

would beg you to observe that it was a great Frenchman, none other than

Pascal, who paid the highest of all tributes to the dog. "The more I see of

men," he said, "the better I like dogs." I challenge you to produce from

any French source such an encomium on the cat.

No, I continued, the dog is a generous, warmhearted, chivalrous fellow, who

will play with you, mourn for you, or die for you. Why, literature is full

of his heroism. Who has climbed Helvellyn without being haunted by that

shepherd's dog that inspired Scott and Byron? Or the Pass of St. Bernard

without remembering the faithful hounds of the great monastery? But the cat

is a secret and alien creature, selfish and mysterious, a Dr. Jekyll and

Mr. Hyde. See her purring on the hearth-rug in front of the fire, and she

seems the picture of innocence and guileless content. All a blind, my dear

fellow, all a blind. Wait till night comes. Then where is demure Mistress

Puss? Is she at home keeping vigil with the good dog Tray? No, the house

may be in blazes or ransacked by burglars for all she cares. She is out on

the tiles and in back gardens pursuing her unholy ritual--that strange

ritual that seems so Oriental, so sinister, so full of devilish purpose. I

can understand the old association of witchcraft with cats. The sight of

cats almost makes me believe in witchcraft, in spite of myself. I can

believe anything about a cat. She is heartless and mercenary. Her name has

become the synonym of everything that is mean, spiteful, and vicious. "An

old cat" is the unkindest thing you can say about a woman.

But the dog wears his heart on his sleeve. His life is as open as the day.

He has his indecorums, but he has no secrets. You may see the worst of him

at a glance, but the best of him is inexhaustible. A cat is as remote from

your life as a lizard, but a dog is as intimate as your own thoughts or

your own shadow, and his loyalty is one of the consolations of a disloyal

world. You remember that remark of Charles Reade's: "He was only a man, but

he was as faithful as a dog." It was the highest tribute he could pay to

his hero--that he was as faithful as a dog. And think of his services--see

him drawing his cart in Belgium, rounding up the sheep into the fold on the

Yorkshire fells, tending the cattle by the highway, warning off the night

prowler from the lonely homestead, always alert, always obedient, always

the friend of man, be he never so friendless.... Shall we go for a walk?

At the joyous word Quilp leapt on me with a frenzied demonstration. "Good

dog," I said. "If Mr. McKenna puts a guinea tax on you I'll never say a

good word for him again."

"W.G."

The worst of spending week-ends in the country in these anxious days is the

difficulty of getting news. About six o'clock on Saturday evening I am

seized with a furious hunger. What has happened on the East front? What on

the West? What in Serbia? Has Greece made up its heroic mind? Is Rumania

still trembling on the brink? What does the French communiqué say? These

and a hundred other questions descend on me with frightful insistence.

Clearly I can't go to bed without having them answered. But there is not an

evening paper to be got nearer than the little railway station in the

valley two miles away, and there is no way of getting it except by Shanks'

mare. And so, unable to resist the glamour of _The Star_, I start out

across the fields for the station.

As I stood on the platform last Saturday evening devouring the latest war

news under the dim oil lamp, a voice behind me said, in broad rural accent,

"Bill, I say, W.G. is dead." At the word I turned hastily to another column

and found the news that had stirred him. And even in the midst of

world-shaking events it stirred me too. For a brief moment I forgot the war

and was back in that cheerful world where we used to be happy, where we

greeted the rising sun with light hearts and saw its setting without fear.

In that cheerful world I can hardly recall a time when a big man with a

black beard was not my King.

I first saw him in the 'seventies. I was a small boy then, and I did him

the honour of playing truant--"playing wag" we called it. I felt that the

occasion demanded it. To have the god of my idolatry in my own little town

and not to pay him my devotions--why, the idea was almost like blasphemy. A

half-dozen, or even a dozen, from my easily infuriated master would be a

small price to pay. I should take the stripes as a homage to the hero. He

would never know, but I should be proud to suffer in his honour.

Unfortunately there was a canvas round the field where the hero played, and

as the mark of the Mint was absent from my pockets I was on the wrong side

of the canvas. But I knew a spot where by lying flat on your stomach and

keeping your head very low you could see under the canvas and get a view of

the wicket. It was not a comfortable position, but I saw the King. I think

I was a little disappointed that there was nothing supernatural about his

appearance and that there were no portents in the heavens to announce his

coming. It didn't seem quite right somehow. In a general way I knew he was

only a man, but I was quite prepared to see something tremendous happen,

the sun to dance or the earth to heave, when he appeared. I never felt the

indifference of Nature to the affairs of men so acutely.

I saw him many times afterwards, and I suppose I owe more undiluted

happiness to him than to any man that ever lived. For he was the genial

tyrant in a world that was all sunshine. There are other games, no doubt,

which will give you as much exercise and pleasure in playing them as

cricket, but there is no game that fills the mind with such memories and

seems enveloped in such a gracious and kindly atmosphere. If you have once

loved it and played it, you will find talk in it enough "for the wearing

out of six fashions," as Falstaff says. I like a man who has cricket in his

soul. I find I am prejudiced in his favour, and am disposed to disbelieve

any ill about him. I think my affection for Jorkins began with the

discovery that he, like myself, saw that astounding catch with which Ulyett

dismissed Bonnor in the Australian match at Lord's in 1883--or was it 1884?

And when to this mutual and immortal memory we added the discovery that we

were both at the Oval at the memorable match when Crossland rattled Surrey

out like ninepins and the crowd mobbed him, and Key and Roller miraculously

pulled the game out of the fire, our friendship was sealed.

The fine thing about a wrangle on cricket is that there is no bitterness in

it. When you talk about politicians you are always on the brink of bad

temper. When you disagree about the relative merits of W.B. Yeats or

Francis Thompson you are afflicted with scorn for the other's lack of

perception. But you may quarrel about cricketers and love each other all

the time. For example, I am prepared to stand up in a truly Christian

spirit to the bowling of anybody in defence of my belief that--next to him

of the black beard--Lohmann was the most naturally gifted all-round

cricketer there has ever been. What grace of action he had, what an

instinct for the weak spot of his opponent, what a sense for fitting the

action to the moment, above all, what a gallant spirit he played the game

in! And that, after all, is the real test of the great cricketer. It is the

man who brings the spirit of adventure into the game that I want. Of the

Quaifes and the Scottons and the Barlows I have nothing but dreary

memories. They do not mean cricket to me. And even Shrewsbury and Hayward

left me cold. They were too faultily faultless, too icily regular for my

taste. They played cricket not as though it was a game, but as though it

was a proposition in Euclid. And I don't like Euclid.

It was the hearty joyousness that "W.G." shed around him that made him so

dear to us youngsters of all ages. I will admit, if you like, that

Ranjitsinhji at his best was more of a magician with the bat, that Johnny

Briggs made you laugh more with his wonderful antics, that A.P. Lucas had

more finish, Palairet more grace, and so on. But it was the abundance of

the old man with the black beard that was so wonderful. You never came to

the end of him. He was like a generous roast of beef--you could cut and

come again, and go on coming. Other men flitted across our sky like

meteors, but he shone on like the sun in the heavens, and like the sun in

the heavens he scattered largesse over the land. He did not seem so much a

man as an institution, a symbol of summer and all its joys, a sort of

Father Christmas clothed in flannels and sunshine. It did you good merely

to look at him. It made you feel happy to see such a huge capacity for

enjoyment, such mighty subtlety, such ponderous gaiety. It was as though

Jove, or Vulcan, or some other god of antiquity had come down to play games

with the mortals. You would not have been much surprised if, when the

shadows lengthened across the greensward and the umpire signalled that the

day's play was done, he had wrapped himself in a cloud of glory and floated

away to Olympus.

And now he is gone indeed, and it seems as though a part, and that a very

happy part, of my life has gone with him. When sanity returns to the earth,

there will arise other deities of the cricket field, but not for me. Never

again shall I recapture the careless rapture that came with the vision of

the yellow cap flaming above the black beard, of the Herculean frame and

the mighty bared arms, and all the godlike apparition of the master. As I

turned out of the little station and passed through the fields and climbed

the hill I felt that the darkness that has come upon the earth in these

days had taken a deeper shade of gloom, for even the lights of the happy

past were being quenched.

Pebbles on the shore [by] Alpha of the plough · 第 9 / 58 题