OVERTURE TO THE OPERA, “THE MARRIAGE OF FIGARO”

_Le Nozze di Figaro: dramma giocoso in quadro atti; poesia di Lorenzo Da

Ponte, aggiustata dalla commedia del Beaumarchais, “Le Mariage de

Figaro”; musica di W. A. Mozart_, was composed at Vienna in 1786 and

produced there on May 1 of the same year.

The overture opens (_presto_, D major, 4-4) immediately with the first

theme; the first part of it is a running passage of seven measures in

eighth notes (strings and bassoons in octaves), and the second part is

given for four measures to wind instruments, with a joyous response of

seven measures by full orchestra. This theme is repeated. A subsidiary

theme follows, and the second theme appears in A major, a gay figure in

the violins, with bassoon, afterward flute. There is no free fantasia.

There is a long _coda_.

Mozart saw in the play of Beaumarchais an excellent libretto for an

opera. Da Ponte tells the story in his amusing _Memoirs_: “Talking one

day with him [Mozart], he asked me if I could turn Beaumarchais’s _Noces

de Figaro_ into an opera. The proposition was to my taste, and the

success was immediate and universal. A little before, this piece had

been forbidden by the Emperor’s command, on account of its immorality.

How then to propose it anew? Baron Vetzlar [Wezlar] offered me with his

customary generosity a reasonable price for my libretto and assured me

that he would see to its production at London or in France, if it were

refused in Vienna. I did not accept the offer, and I secretly began

work. I waited the opportune moment to propose the poem either to the

Intendant or, if I had the courage, to the Emperor himself. Martin alone

was in my confidence, and he was so generous, out of deference to

Mozart, to give me time to finish my piece before I began work on one

for him. As fast as I wrote the words, Mozart wrote the music, and it

was all finished in six weeks. The lucky star of Mozart willed an

opportune moment and permitted me to carry my manuscript directly to the

Emperor.

“‘How’s this?’ said Joseph to me. ‘You know that Mozart, remarkable for

his instrumental music, has with one exception never written for song,

and the exception is not good for much.’

“I answered timidly, ‘Without the kindness of the Emperor, I should have

written only one drama in Vienna.’

“‘True: but I have already forbidden the German company to play this

piece _Figaro_.’

“‘I know it; but, in turning it into an opera, I have cut out whole

scenes, shortened others, and been careful everywhere to omit anything

that might shock the conventionalities and good taste; in a word, I have

made a work worthy of the theater honored by His Majesty’s protection.

As for the music, as far as I can judge, it seems to me a masterpiece.’

“‘All right; I trust to your taste and prudence. Send the score to the

copyists.’

“A moment afterward I was at Mozart’s. I had not yet told him the good

news, when he was ordered to go to the palace with his score. He obeyed,

and the Emperor thus heard several _morceaux_ which delighted him.

Joseph II had a very correct taste in music, and in general for

everything that is included in the fine arts. The prodigious success of

this work throughout the whole world is a proof of it. The music,

incredible to relate, did not obtain a unanimous vote of praise. The

Viennese composers crushed by it, Rosenberg and Casti especially, never

failed to run it down.”[40]

Did Da Ponte show himself the courtier when he spoke of the Emperor’s

“very correct taste in music”?

There was a cabal from the start against the production of Mozart’s

opera. Kelly says in his _Reminiscences_: “Every one of the opera

company took part in the contest. I alone was a stickler for Mozart, and

naturally enough, for he had a claim on my warmest wishes.... Of all the

performers in this opera at that time, but one survives—myself. [This

was written in 1826.] It was allowed that never was opera stronger cast.

I have seen it performed at different periods in other countries, and

well too, but no more to compare with its original performance than

light is to darkness. All the original performers had the advantage of

the instruction of the composer, who transfused into their minds his

inspired meaning. I never shall forget his little animated countenance,

when lighted up with the glowing rays of genius; it is as impossible to

describe as it would be to paint sunbeams.”

Philip Hale's Boston Symphony Programme Notes · 第 68 / 143 题