CONCERTO FOR VIOLIN, IN D MAJOR, OP. 61

I. Allegro ma non troppo

II. Larghetto

III. Rondo

Beethoven composed this concerto in 1806 for the violinist, Franz

Clement, who played it for the first time at the latter’s concert in the

Theater an der Wien, December 23 of that year.

Beethoven, often behindhand in finishing compositions for solo

players—according to the testimony of Dr. Bartolini and others—did not

have the concerto ready for rehearsal. Clement played it at the concert

_a vista_.

The first movement, _allegro ma non troppo_, in D major, 4-4, begins

with a long orchestral _ritornello_. The first theme is announced by

oboes, clarinets, and bassoons. It is introduced by four taps of the

kettledrums on D. (There is a story that these tones were suggested to

the composer by his hearing a neighbor knocking at the door of his house

for admission late at night.) The wind instruments go on with the second

phrase. Then come the famous and problematical four D sharps in the

first violins. The short second theme is given out by wood-wind and

horns in D major, repeated in D minor, and developed at length. The solo

violin enters after a half cadence on the dominant. The first part of

the movement is repeated. The solo violin plays the themes or embroiders

them. The working out is long and elaborate. A _cadenza_ is introduced

at the climax of the conclusion theme. There is a short _coda_.

The second movement, _Larghetto_, in G major, 4-4, is a romance in free

form. The accompaniment is lightly scored. The theme is almost wholly

confined to the orchestra, while the solo violin embroiders with

elaborate figuration until the end, when it brings in the theme, but

soon abandons it to continue the embroidery. A _cadenza_ leads to the

_finale_.

The third movement, _rondo_, in D major, 6-8, is based on a theme that

has the character of a folk dance. The second theme is a sort of hunting

call for the horns. There is place for the insertion of a free _cadenza_

near the end.

* * *

Beethoven’s great development of the symphony was in his use of the

instruments—not in their number. For the most part, he called for

virtually the same orchestra which his predecessors, Mozart and Haydn,

evolved: two flutes, two oboes, two clarinets, two bassoons, two horns,

two trumpets, kettledrums and strings. This applies to Beethoven’s

First, Second, Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Eighth symphonies

(exceptions: the addition of a third horn in the _Eroica_ symphony, and

use of a single flute in the Fourth).

In the Fifth symphony, he gave greater sonority to his _finale_ with

three trombones, double bassoon, and piccolo.

In the Sixth, he added a piccolo for the storm, two trombones for the

storm and _finale_.

In the Ninth, he increased his horns to four, added three trombones, and

the following instruments in the _alla marcia_ of the _finale_: piccolo,

double bassoon, cymbals, triangle, and bass drum.

In the overtures here listed, Beethoven added to the above essential

orchestration as follows: _Egmont_—two additional horns, piccolo;

_Leonore_—two additional horns and three trombones. The concertos call

for the minimum orchestration, “in twos.”—EDITOR.

HECTOR

BERLIOZ

(Born at La Côte Saint-André, December 11, 1803; died at Paris, March

9, 1869)

The more Berlioz is studied, the more the wonder grows at his colossal

originality. Yet there are some who still insist that he had little

melodic invention. They have ears, and they do not hear. They should

read the essay of Romain Rolland, and the essay of Felix Weingartner in

his _Akkorde_, for there are many, unfortunately, who do not trust their

own judgment and are eager to accept the sayings of others who are

considered men of authority.

Berlioz wrote his _Fantastic_ symphony in a high-strung, hotly romantic

period. Romanticism was in the air. Much that seems fantastic to us,

living in a commercial and material period, was natural then. It was as

natural to be extravagant in belief, theories, speech, manner of life,

dress, as it was to breathe. And Berlioz was a revolutionary of

revolutionaries. His “antediluvian hair” that rose from his forehead was

as much of a symbol as was the flaming waistcoat worn by Théophile on

the memorable first night of _Hernani_. We smile now at the

eccentricities and the extravagancies of the period, but we owe the

perpetrators a heavy debt of gratitude. They made the art of today

possible.

It is easy to call Berlioz a _poseur_, but the young man was terribly in

earnest. He put his own love tragedy into his _Fantastic_ symphony; he

was a man; he suffered; he was there; and so the music did not pass away

with the outward badges of romanticism, with much of Byron’s poetry,

with plays and novels of the time. The emotions he expressed are still

universal and elemental.

Philip Hale's Boston Symphony Programme Notes · 第 23 / 143 题