Now when Badcoke and Harrison came to occupy their chambers

TEDIOUS BRIEF TALES OF GRANTA

AND GRAMARYE.

[Illustration:

E. Joyce Shillington Scales

1919.

_Entrance Gateway, Jesus College._]

TEDIOUS BRIEF TALES OF

GRANTA AND GRAMARYE

BY

“INGULPHUS”

(ARTHUR GRAY, Master of Jesus College)

_With illustrations by_

E. JOYCE SHILLINGTON SCALES

“Merry and tragical, tedious and brief:

That is hot ice and wondrous strange snow.”

_A Midsummer Night’s Dream._

CAMBRIDGE:

W. HEFFER & SONS LTD.

LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT & CO. LTD.

FIRST PUBLISHED, DECEMBER, 1919.

For permission to reprint these tales, which originally appeared in

_The Cambridge Review_, _The Gownsman_ and _Chanticlere_ (the Jesus

College Magazine), the writer thanks the editors and proprietors of

those papers.

Contents

PAGE

I. TO TWO CAMBRIDGE MAGICIANS viii

II. THE EVERLASTING CLUB 1

III. THE TREASURE OF JOHN BADCOKE 9

IV. THE TRUE HISTORY OF ANTHONY FFRYAR 19

V. THE NECROMANCER 28

VI. BROTHER JOHN’S BEQUEST 37

VII. THE BURDEN OF DEAD BOOKS 48

VIII. THANKFULL THOMAS 67

IX. THE PALLADIUM 76

X. THE SACRIST OF SAINT RADEGUND 84

List of Illustrations

I. ENTRANCE GATEWAY, JESUS COLLEGE _Frontispiece_

II. DOORWAY, COW LANE 5

III. ORIEL WINDOW OF HALL AND ENTRANCE TO “K” STAIRCASE 11

IV. OLD HALL, MASTER’S LODGE 17

V. NORTH-WEST CORNER OF CLOISTERS 20

VI. THE MASTER’S STALL 23

VII. MAIN GATEWAY AND PORTER’S LODGE 31

VIII. ON “A” STAIRCASE 33

IX. FIREPLACE IN MASTER’S LODGE 41

X. A CORNER OF THE LIBRARY 51

XI. CHAPEL DOORWAY IN MASTER’S GARDEN 57

XII. NORMAN GALLERY, NORTH TRANSEPT 71

XIII. SOUTH-WEST PIER OF TOWER 74

XIV. IN THE FENS 83

XV. ENTRANCE TO CHAPTER HOUSE 87

XVI. THE CHANCEL SQUINT 90

To Two Cambridge Magicians

In London lanes, uncanonized, untold

By letter’d brass or stone, apart they lie,

Dead and unreck’d of by the passer-by.

Here still they seem together, as of old,

To breathe our air, to walk our Cambridge ground,

Here still to after learners to impart

Hints of the magic that gave Faustus art

To make blind Homer sing “with ravishing sound

To his melodious harp” of Oenon, dead

For Alexander’s love; that framed the spell

Of him who, in the Friar’s “secret cell,”

Made the great marvel of the Brazen Head.

Marlowe and Greene, on you a Cambridge hand

Sprinkles these pious particles of sand.

The Everlasting Club

There is a chamber in Jesus College the existence of which is probably

known to few who are now resident, and fewer still have penetrated into

it or even seen its interior. It is on the right hand of the landing on

the top floor of the precipitous staircase in the angle of the cloister

next the Hall--a staircase which for some forgotten story connected

with it is traditionally called “Cow Lane.” The padlock which secures

its massive oaken door is very rarely unfastened, for the room is bare

and unfurnished. Once it served as a place of deposit for superfluous

kitchen ware, but even that ignominious use has passed from it, and it

is now left to undisturbed solitude and darkness. For I should say that

it is entirely cut off from the light of the outer day by the walling

up, some time in the eighteenth century, of its single window, and such

light as ever reaches it comes from the door, when rare occasion causes

it to be opened.

Yet at no extraordinarily remote day this chamber has evidently been

tenanted, and, before it was given up to darkness, was comfortably

fitted, according to the standard of comfort which was known in college

in the days of George II. There is still a roomy fireplace before which

legs have been stretched and wine and gossip have circulated in the

days of wigs and brocade. For the room is spacious and, when it was

lighted by the window looking eastward over the fields and common, it

must have been a cheerful place for a sociable don.

Let me state in brief, prosaic outline the circumstances which account

for the gloom and solitude in which this room has remained now for

nearly a century and a half.

In the second quarter of the eighteenth century the University

possessed a great variety of clubs of a social kind. There were

clubs in college parlours and clubs in private rooms, or in inns

and coffee-houses: clubs flavoured with politics, clubs clerical,

clubs purporting to be learned and literary. Whatever their professed

particularity, the aim of each was convivial. Some of them, which

included undergraduates as well as seniors, were dissipated enough, and

in their limited provincial way aped the profligacy of such clubs as

the Hell Fire Club of London notoriety.

Among these last was one which was at once more select and of more evil

fame than any of its fellows. By a singular accident, presently to be

explained, the Minute Book of this Club, including the years from 1738

to 1766, came into the hands of a Master of Jesus College, and though,

so far as I am aware, it is no longer extant, I have before me a

transcript of it which, though it is in a recent handwriting, presents

in a bald shape such a singular array of facts that I must ask you to

accept them as veracious. The original book is described as a stout

duodecimo volume bound in red leather and fastened with red silken

strings. The writing in it occupied some 40 pages, and ended with the

date November 2, 1766.

The Club in question was called the Everlasting Club--a name

sufficiently explained by its rules, set forth in the pocket-book. Its

number was limited to seven, and it would seem that its members were

all young men, between 22 and 30. One of them was a Fellow-Commoner of

Trinity: three of them were Fellows of Colleges, among whom I should

specially mention a Fellow of Jesus, named Charles Bellasis: another

was a landed proprietor in the county, and the sixth was a young

Cambridge physician. The Founder and President of the Club was the

Honourable Alan Dermot, who, as the son of an Irish peer, had obtained

a nobleman’s degree in the University, and lived in idleness in the

town. Very little is known of his life and character, but that little

is highly in his disfavour. He was killed in a duel at Paris in the

year 1743, under circumstances which I need not particularise, but

which point to an exceptional degree of cruelty and wickedness in the

slain man.

I will quote from the first pages of the Minute Book some of the laws

of the Club, which will explain its constitution:--

“1. This Society consisteth of seven Everlastings, who may be Corporeal

or Incorporeal, as Destiny shall determine.

2. The rules of the Society, as herein written, are immutable and

Everlasting.

3. None shall hereafter be chosen into the Society and none shall cease

to be members.

4. The Honourable Alan Dermot is the Everlasting President of the

Society.

5. The Senior Corporeal Everlasting, not being the President, shall be

the Secretary of the Society, and in this Book of Minutes shall record

its transactions, the date at which any Everlasting shall cease to

be Corporeal, and all fines due to the Society. And when such Senior

Everlasting shall cease to be Corporeal he shall, either in person or

by some sure hand, deliver this Book of Minutes to him who shall be

next Senior and at the time Corporeal, and he shall in like manner

record the transactions therein and transmit it to the next Senior. The

neglect of these provisions shall be visited by the President with fine

or punishment according to his discretion.

6. On the second day of November in every year, being the Feast of All

Souls, at ten o’clock _post meridiem_, the Everlastings shall meet

at supper in the place of residence of that Corporeal member of the

Society to whom it shall fall in order of rotation to entertain them,

and they shall all subscribe in this Book of Minutes their names and

present place of abode.

7. It shall be the obligation of every Everlasting to be present at the

yearly entertainment of the Society, and none shall allege for excuse

that he has not been invited thereto. If any Everlasting shall fail

to attend the yearly meeting, or in his turn shall fail to provide

entertainment for the Society, he shall be mulcted at the discretion of

the President.

8. Nevertheless, if in any year, in the month of October and not less

than seven days before the Feast of All Souls, the major part of the

Society, that is to say, four at the least, shall meet and record in

writing in these Minutes that it is their desire that no entertainment

be given in that year, then, notwithstanding the two rules last

rehearsed, there shall be no entertainment in that year, and no

Everlasting shall be mulcted on the ground of his absence.”

The rest of the rules are either too profane or too puerile to be

quoted here. They indicate the extraordinary levity with which the

members entered on their preposterous obligations. In particular, to

the omission of any regulation as to the transmission of the Minute

Book after the last Everlasting ceased to be “Corporeal,” we owe the

accident that it fell into the hands of one who was not a member of the

society, and the consequent preservation of its contents to the present

day.

Low as was the standard of morals in all classes of the University in

the first half of the eighteenth century, the flagrant defiance of

public decorum by the members of the Everlasting Society brought upon

it the stern censure of the authorities, and after a few years it was

practically dissolved and its members banished from the University.

Charles Bellasis, for instance, was obliged to leave the college,

and, though he retained his fellowship, he remained absent from it

for nearly twenty years. But the minutes of the society reveal a more

terrible reason for its virtual extinction.

Between the years 1738 and 1743 the minutes record many meetings of

the Club, for it met on other occasions besides that of All Souls

Day. Apart from a great deal of impious jocularity on the part of the

writers, they are limited to the formal record of the attendance of

the members, fines inflicted, and so forth. The meeting on November

2nd in the latter year is the first about which there is any departure

from the stereotyped forms. The supper was given in the house of the

physician. One member, Henry Davenport, the former Fellow-Commoner of

Trinity, was absent from the entertainment, as he was then serving

in Germany, in the Dettingen campaign. The minutes contain an entry,

“Mulctatus propter absentiam per Presidentem, Hen. Davenport.” An entry

on the next page of the book runs, “Henry Davenport by a Cannon-shot

became an Incorporeal Member, November 3, 1743.”

[Illustration: _Doorway, Cow Lane._]

The minutes give in their own handwriting, under date November 2, the

names and addresses of the six other members. First in the list, in

a large bold hand, is the autograph of “Alan Dermot, President, at

the Court of His Royal Highness.” Now in October Dermot had certainly

been in attendance on the Young Pretender at Paris, and doubtless

the address which he gave was understood at the time by the other

Everlastings to refer to the fact. But on October 28, five days

_before_ the meeting of the Club, he was killed, as I have already

mentioned, in a duel. The news of his death cannot have reached

Cambridge on November 2, for the Secretary’s record of it is placed

below that of Davenport, and with the date November 10: “this day was

reported that the President was become an Incorporeal by the hands of

a french chevalier.” And in a sudden ebullition, which is in glaring

contrast with his previous profanities, he has dashed down “The Good

God shield us from ill.”

The tidings of the President’s death scattered the Everlastings like

a thunderbolt. They left Cambridge and buried themselves in widely

parted regions. But the Club did not cease to exist. The Secretary

was still bound to his hateful records: the five survivors did not

dare to neglect their fatal obligations. Horror of the presence of the

President made the November gathering once and for ever impossible:

but horror, too, forbade them to neglect the precaution of meeting

in October of every year to put in writing their objection to the

celebration. For five years five names are appended to that entry in

the minutes, and that is all the business of the Club. Then another

member died, who was not the Secretary.

For eighteen more years four miserable men met once each year to

deliver the same formal protest. During those years we gather from

the signatures that Charles Bellasis returned to Cambridge, now, to

appearance, chastened and decorous. He occupied the rooms which I have

described on the staircase in the corner of the cloister.

Then in 1766 comes a new handwriting and an altered minute: “Jan. 27,

on this day Francis Witherington, Secretary, became an Incorporeal

Member. The same day this Book was delivered to me, James Harvey.”

Harvey lived only a month, and a similar entry on March 7 states that

the book has descended, with the same mysterious celerity, to William

Catherston. Then, on May 18, Charles Bellasis writes that on that day,

being the date of Catherston’s decease, the Minute Book has come to

him as the last surviving Corporeal of the Club.

As it is my purpose to record fact only I shall not attempt to describe

the feelings of the unhappy Secretary when he penned that fatal

record. When Witherington died it must have come home to the three

survivors that after twenty-three years’ intermission the ghastly

entertainment must be annually renewed, with the addition of fresh

incorporeal guests, or that they must undergo the pitiless censure of

the President. I think it likely that the terror of the alternative,

coupled with the mysterious delivery of the Minute Book, was

answerable for the speedy decease of the two first successors to the

Secretaryship. Now that the alternative was offered to Bellasis alone,

he was firmly resolved to bear the consequences, whatever they might

be, of an infringement of the Club rules.

The graceless days of George II. had passed away from the University.

They were succeeded by times of outward respectability, when religion

and morals were no longer publicly challenged. With Bellasis, too, the

petulance of youth had passed: he was discreet, perhaps exemplary. The

scandal of his early conduct was unknown to most of the new generation,

condoned by the few survivors who had witnessed it.

On the night of November 2nd, 1766, a terrible event revived in the

older inhabitants of the College the memory of those evil days. From

ten o’clock to midnight a hideous uproar went on in the chamber of

Bellasis. Who were his companions none knew. Blasphemous outcries and

ribald songs, such as had not been heard for twenty years past, aroused

from sleep or study the occupants of the court; but among the voices

was not that of Bellasis. At twelve a sudden silence fell upon the

cloisters. But the Master lay awake all night, troubled at the relapse

of a respected colleague and the horrible example of libertinism set to

his pupils.

In the morning all remained quiet about Bellasis’ chamber. When his

door was opened, soon after daybreak, the early light creeping through

the drawn curtains revealed a strange scene. About the table were drawn

seven chairs, but some of them had been overthrown, and the furniture

was in chaotic disorder, as after some wild orgy. In the chair at the

foot of the table sat the lifeless figure of the Secretary, his head

bent over his folded arms, as though he would shield his eyes from

some horrible sight. Before him on the table lay pen, ink and the red

Minute Book. On the last inscribed page, under the date of November

2nd, were written, for the first time since 1742, the autographs of

the seven members of the Everlasting Club, but without address. In the

same strong hand in which the President’s name was written there was

appended below the signatures the note, “Mulctatus per Presidentem

propter neglectum obsonii, Car. Bellasis.”

The Minute Book was secured by the Master of the College, and I believe

that he alone was acquainted with the nature of its contents. The

scandal reflected on the College by the circumstances revealed in it

caused him to keep the knowledge rigidly to himself. But some suspicion

of the nature of the occurrences must have percolated to students and

servants, for there was a long-abiding belief in the College that

annually on the night of November 2 sounds of unholy revelry were

heard to issue from the chamber of Bellasis. I cannot learn that the

occupants of the adjoining rooms have ever been disturbed by them.

Indeed, it is plain from the minutes that owing to their improvident

drafting no provision was made for the perpetuation of the All Souls

entertainment after the last Everlasting ceased to be Corporeal. Such

superstitious belief must be treated with contemptuous incredulity.

But whether for that cause or another the rooms were shut up, and have

remained tenantless from that day to this.

[Illustration]

The Treasure of John Badcoke

As this narrative of an occurrence in the history of Jesus College

may appear to verge on the domain of romance, I think it proper to

state by way of preface, that for some of its details I am indebted to

documentary evidence which is accessible and veracious. Other portions

of the story are supplied from sources the credibility of which my

readers will be able to estimate.

On the 8th of November, 1538, the Priory of St. Giles and St. Andrew,

Barnwell, was surrendered to King Henry VIII. by John Badcoke, the

Prior, and the convent of that house. The surrender was sealed with the

common seal, subscribed by the Prior and six canons, and acknowledged

on the same day in the Chapter House of the Priory, before Thomas Legh,

Doctor of Laws.[1]

Dr. Legh and his fellows, who had been deputed by Cromwell to visit the

monasteries, had too frequent occasion to deplore the frowardness of

religious households in opposing the King’s will in the matter of their

dissolution. Among many such reports I need only cite the case of the

Prior of Christ Church, Canterbury, mentioned in a letter to Cromwell

from one of his agents, Christopher Leyghton.[2] He tells Cromwell

that in an inventory exhibited by the Prior to Dr. Leyghton, the

King’s visitor, the Prior had “wilfullye left owte a remembraunce of

certayne parcells of silver, gold and stone to the value of thowsandys

of poundys”; that it was not to be doubted that he would “eloyne owt

of the same howse into the handys of his secret fryndys thowsandes of

poundes, which is well knowne he hathe, to hys comfort hereafter”; and

that it was common report in the monastery that any monk who should

open the matter to the King’s advisers “shalbe poysenyde or murtheryde,

as he hath murthredde diverse others.”

Far different from the truculent attitude of this murderous Prior

was the conduct on the like occasion of Prior John Badcoke. Dr. Legh

reported him to be “honest and conformable.” He furnished an exact

inventory of the possessions of his house, and quietly retired on the

pittance allowed to him by the King. He prevailed upon the other canons

to shew the same submission to the royal will, and they peaceably

dispersed, some to country incumbencies, others to resume in the

Colleges the studies commenced in earlier life.

John Badcoke settled in Jesus College. The Bursar’s Rental of 1538-39

shows that his residence there began in the autumn of the earlier year,

immediately after the surrender of the monastery. Divorced from the

Priory he was still attached to Barnwell, and took up the duties of

Vicar of the small parish church of St. Andrew, which stood close to

the Priory gate. So long as Henry VIII. lived, and the rites of the old

religion were tolerated, he seems to have ministered faithfully to the

spiritual needs of his parishioners, unsuspected and unmolested.

More than twelve months elapsed before the demolition of the canons’

house was taken in hand, and, for so long, in the empty church the

Prior still offered mass on ceremonial days for the repose of the souls

of the Peverels and Peches who had built and endowed the house in long

bygone days, and were buried beside the High Altar. In the porter’s

lodge remained the only occupant of the monastery--a former servant of

the house, who, from the circumstance that in his secular profession he

was a mason, had the name of Adam Waller. Occasional intruders on the

solitude of the cloister or the monastic garden sometimes lighted on

the ex-Prior pacing the grass-grown walks, as of old, and generally in

company with a younger priest.

[Illustration: Oriel Window of Hall & Entrance to ‘K’ Staircase]

This companion was named Richard Harrison. He was not one of the

dispossessed canons, but came from the Priory of Christ Church,

Canterbury, of which mention has been made. He was the youngest and

latest professed of the monks there, a nephew of the Prior, as also of

John Badcoke. He had not been present at the time of Dr. Leyghton’s

visitation, as he happened then to be visiting his uncle at Barnwell.

As the Canterbury monks were ejected in his absence he had remained

at Barnwell, and there he shared his uncle’s parochial duties. He,

too, became a resident at Jesus, and he occupied rooms in the College

immediately beneath those of Badcoke.

Late in the year 1539 the demolition of Barnwell Priory was begun. Adam

Waller was engaged in the work. One incident, which apparently passed

almost unnoticed at the time, may be mentioned in connection with this

business. The keys of the church were in the keeping of Waller, who

had been in the habit of surrendering them to the two ecclesiastics

whenever they performed the divine offices there. On the morning when

the demolition was to begin, it was found that the stone covering

the altar-tomb of Pain Peverel, crusader and founder of the Priory,

had been dislodged, and that the earth within it had been recently

disturbed. Waller professed to know nothing of the matter.

The account rolls of the College Bursars in the reigns of Henry

VIII. and Edward VI. fortunately tell us exactly the situation of

the rooms occupied by Badcoke and Harrison, and as, for the proper

understanding of subsequent events, it is necessary that we should

realise their condition and relation to the rest of the College, I

shall not scruple to be particular. They were on the left-hand side of

the staircase now called K, in the eastern range of the College, and

at the northern end of what had once been the dormitory of the Nuns of

St. Radegund. Badcoke’s chamber, which was on the highest floor, was

one of the largest in the College, and for that reason the Statutes

prescribed that it should be reserved “for more venerable persons

resorting to the College”; and Badcoke, being neither a Fellow nor a

graduate, was regarded as belonging to this class. Below his chamber

was that of Harrison, and on the ground-floor was the “cool-house,”

where the College fuel was kept. Between this ground-floor room and L

staircase--which did not then exist--there is seen at the present day a

rarely opened door. Inside the door a flight of some half-dozen steps

descends to a narrow space, which might be deemed a passage, save that

it has no outlet at the farther end. On either side it is flanked, to

the height of two floors of K staircase, by walls of ancient monastic

masonry; the third and highest floor is carried over it. Here, in the

times of Henry VIII. and the Nunnery days before them, ran or stagnated

a Stygian stream, known as “the kytchynge sinke ditch,” foul with scum

from the College offices. Northward from Badcoke’s staircase was “the

wood-yard,” on the site of the present L staircase. It communicated by

a door in its outward, eastern wall with a green close which in the old

days had been the Nunnery graveyard. In Badcoke’s times it was still

uneven with the hillocks which marked the resting-places of nameless,

unrecorded Nuns. The old graveyard was intersected by a cart-track

leading from Jesus Lane to the wood-yard door. The Bursar’s books show

that Badcoke controlled the wood-yard and coal-house, perhaps in the

capacity of Promus, or Steward.

Now when Badcoke and Harrison came to occupy their chambers on K

staircase, Jesus, like other Colleges in those troublous times, had

fallen on evil days. Its occupants comprised only the Master, some

eight Fellows, a few servants, and about half-a-dozen “disciples.”

Nearly half the rooms in College were empty, and the records show

that many were tenantless, _propter defectum reparacionis_; that is,

because walls, roofs and floors were decayed and ruinous. Badcoke,

being a man of means, paid a handsome rent for his chambers, not less

than ten shillings by the year, in consideration of which the College

put it in tenantable repair; and, as a circumstance which has some

significance in relation to this narrative, it is to be noted that the

Bursar--the accounts of the year are no longer extant--recorded that

in 1539 he paid a sum of three shillings and fourpence “to Adam Waller

for layyinge of new brick in yᵉ cupboard of Mr. Badcoke’s chamber.”

The cupboard in question was seemingly a small recessed space, still

recognisable in a gyp-room belonging to the chambers which were

Badcoke’s. The rooms on the side of the staircase opposite to those of

Badcoke and Harrison were evidently unoccupied; the Bursar took no

rent from them. The other inmates of the College dwelt in the cloister

court.

In this comparative isolation Badcoke and Harrison lived until the

death of Henry VIII. in 1546. In course of time Harrison became a

Fellow of the College; but Badcoke preferred to retain the exceptional

status of its honoured guest. To the Master, Dr. Reston, and the

Fellows, whose religious sympathies were with the old order of things,

their company was inoffensive and even welcome. But trouble came upon

the College in 1549, when it was visited by King Edward’s Protestant

Commissioners. It stands on record, that on May 26th “they commanded

six altars to be pulled down in the church,” and in a chamber, which

may have been Badcoke’s, “caused certayn images to be broken.” Mr.

Badcoke “had an excommunicacion sette uppe for him,” and was dismissed

from the office, whatever it was, that he held in the College. Worse

still for his happiness, his companion of many years, Richard Harrison,

was “expulsed his felowshippe” on some supposition of trafficking with

the court of Rome.[3] He went overseas, as it was understood, to the

Catholic University of Louvain in Flanders.

In 1549 Badcoke must have been, as age went in the sixteenth century,

an old man. His deprivation of office, the loss of his friend, and

the abandonment of long treasured hopes for the restitution of the

religious system to which his life had been devoted, plunged him in

a settled despondency. The Fellows, who showed for him such sympathy

as they dared, understood that between him and Harrison there passed

a secret correspondence. But in course of years this source of

consolation dried up. Harrison was dead, or he had travelled away

from Louvain. With the other members of the College Badcoke wholly

parted company, and lived a recluse in his unneighboured room. By the

wood-yard gate, of which he still had a key, he could let himself

out beyond the College walls, and sometimes by day, oftener after

nightfall, he was to be seen wandering beneath his window in the Nuns’

graveyard, his old feet, like Friar Laurence’s, “stumbling at graves.”

An occasional visitor, who was known to be his pensioner, was Adam

Waller. But, though Waller was still at times employed in the service

of the College, his character and condition had deteriorated with

years. He was a sturdy beggar, a drunkard, sullen and dangerous in his

cups, and Badcoke was heard to hint some terror of his presence. At

last the Master learnt from the ex-Prior that he was about to quit the

College, and none doubted that he would follow Harrison to Louvain.

Shortly after this became known, Badcoke disappeared from College. He

had lived in such seclusion that for a day or two it was not noticed

that his door remained closed, and that he had not been seen in his

customary walks. When the door was at last forced it was discovered

that he had indeed gone, but, strangely, he had left behind him the

whole of his effects. Adam Waller was the last person who was known to

have entered his chamber, and, being questioned, he said that Badcoke

had informed him of his intention to depart three days previously,

but, for some unexplained reason, had desired him to keep his purpose

secret, and had not imparted his destination. Badcoke’s life of

seclusion, and his known connection with English Catholics beyond sea,

gave colour to Waller’s story, and, so far as I am aware, no enquiries

were made as to the subsequent fate of the ex-Prior. But a strange fact

was commented on--that the floor of the so-called cupboard was strewn

with bricks, and that in the place from which they had been dislodged

was an arched recess of considerable size, which must have been made

during Badcoke’s tenancy of the room. There was nothing in the recess.

Another circumstance there was which called for no notice in the then

dilapidated state of half the College rooms. Two boards were loose in

the floor of the larger chamber. Thirty feet below the gap which their

removal exposed, lay the dark impurities of the “kytchynge sinke ditch.”

Adam Waller died a beggar as he had lived.

A century after these occurrences--in the year 1642--the attention of

the College was drawn by a severe visitation of plague to a much-needed

sanitary reform. The black ditch which ran under K staircase was

“cast,” that is, its bed was effectually cleaned out, and its channel

was stopped; and so it came about that from that day to this it has

presented a clean and dry floor of gravel. Beneath the settled slime of

centuries was discovered a complete skeleton. How it came there nobody

knew, and nobody enquired. Probably it was guessed to be a relic of

some dim and grim monastic mystery.

Now whether Adam Waller knew or suspected the existence of a treasure

hidden in the wall-recess of Badcoke’s chamber, and murdered the

ex-Prior when he was about to remove it to Louvain, I cannot say.

One thing is certain--that he did not find the treasure there. When

Badcoke disappeared he left his will, with his other belongings, in

his chamber. After a decent interval, when it seemed improbable that

he would return, probate was obtained by the Master and Fellows, to

whom he had bequeathed the chief part of his effects. In 1858 the wills

proved in the University court were removed to Peterborough, and there,

for aught I know, his will may yet be seen. The property bequeathed

consisted principally of books of theology. Among them was Stephanus’

Latin Vulgate Bible of 1528 in two volumes folio. This he devised “of

my heartie good wylle to my trustie felow and frynde, Richard Harrison,

if he shal returne to Cambrege aftyr the tyme of my decesse.” Richard

Harrison never returned to Cambridge, and the Bible, with the other

books, found its way to the College Library.

Now there are still in the Library two volumes of this Vulgate Bible.

There is nothing in either of them to identify them with the books

mentioned in Badcoke’s will, for they have lost the fly-leaves which

might have revealed the owner’s autograph. Here and there in the

margins are annotations in a sixteenth-century handwriting; and in the

same handwriting on one of the lost leaves was a curious inscription,

which suggests that the writer’s mind was running on some treasure

which was not spiritual. First at the top of the page, in clear

and large letters, was copied a passage from Psalm 55: “Cor meum

conturbatum est in me: et formido mortis cecidit super me. Et dixi,

Quis dabit pennas mihi sicut columbae, et volabo et requiescam.” (My

heart is disquieted within me: and the fear of death is fallen upon

me. And I said, O that I had wings like a dove: for then would I fly

away, and be at rest.) Then, in lettering of the same kind, came a

portion of Deuteronomy xxviii. 12: “Aperiet dominus thesaurum suum,

benedicetque cunctis operibus tuis.” (The Lord will disclose his

treasure, and will bless all the works of thy hands.) Under this, in

smaller letters, were the words, “Vide super hoc Ezechielis cap. xl.”

[Illustration: Old Hall, Master’s Lodge.]

If in the same volume the chapter in question is referred to, a

singular fact discloses itself. Certain words in the text are

underscored in red pencil, and fingers, inked in the margin, are

directed to the lines in which they occur. Taken in their consecutive

order these words run: “Ecce murus forinsecus ... ad portam quae

respiciebat viam orientalem ... mensus est a facie portae extrinsecus

ad orientem et aquilonem quinque cubitorum ... hoc est gazophylacium.”

This may be taken to mean, “Look at the outside wall ... at the gate

facing towards the eastern road ... he measured from the gate outwards

five cubits (7¹⁄₂ feet) towards the north-east ... there is the

treasure.”

The outer wall of the College, the wood-yard gate and the road through

the Nuns’ cemetery must at once have suggested themselves to Richard

Harrison, had he lived to see his friend’s bequest, and he must have

taken it as an instruction from the testator that a treasure known

to both parties was hidden in the spot indicated, close to Badcoke’s

chamber. And the first text cited must have conveyed to him that his

friend, in some deadly terror, had transferred the treasure thither

from the place where the two friends had originally laid it. But

the message never reached Harrison, and it is quite certain that no

treasure has been sought or found in that spot. If the Canterbury or

any other treasure was deposited there by Badcoke it rests there still.

To those who are curious to know more of this matter I would say:

first, ascertain minutely from Loggan’s seventeenth-century plan of the

College the position of the wood-yard gate; and, secondly, which indeed

should be firstly, make absolutely certain that John Badcoke was not

mystifying posterity by an elaborate jest.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Cooper, _Annals_, I., p. 393.

[2] _The Suppression of the Monasteries_ (Camden Society’s

Publications), p. 90.

[3] Cooper, _Annals_, II. p. 29.

The True History of Anthony Ffryar

The world, it is said, knows nothing of its greatest men. In our

Cambridge microcosm it may be doubted whether we are better informed

concerning some of the departed great ones who once walked the confines

of our Colleges. Which of us has heard of Anthony Ffryar of Jesus?

History is dumb respecting him. Yet but for the unhappy event recorded

in this unadorned chronicle his fame might have stood with that of

Bacon of Trinity, or Harvey of Caius. _They_ lived to be old men:

Ffryar died before he was thirty--his work unfinished, his fame unknown

even to his contemporaries.

So meagre is the record of his life’s work that it is contained in a

few bare notices in the College Bursar’s Books, in the Grace Books

which date his matriculation and degrees, and in the entry of his

burial in the register of All Saints’ Parish. These simple annals I

have ventured to supplement with details of a more or less hypothetical

character which will serve to show what humanity lost by his early

death. Readers will be able to judge for themselves the degree of care

which I have taken not to import into the story anything which may

savour of the improbable or romantic.

Anthony Ffryar matriculated in the year 1541-2, his age being then

probably 15 or 16. He took his B.A. degree in 1545, his M.A. in 1548.

He became a Fellow about the end of 1547, and died in the summer of

1551. Such are the documentary facts relating to him. Dr. Reston was

Master of the College during the whole of his tenure of a Fellowship

and died in the same year as Ffryar. The chamber which Ffryar occupied

as a Fellow was on the first floor of the staircase at the west end

of the Chapel. The staircase has since been absorbed in the Master’s

Lodge, but the doorway through which it was approached from the

cloister may still be seen. At the time when Ffryar lived there the

nave of the Chapel was used as a parish church, and his windows

overlooked the graveyard, then called “Jesus churchyard,” which is now

a part of the Master’s garden.

[Illustration: _North West Corner of Cloisters._]

Ffryar was of course a priest, as were nearly all the Fellows in his

day. But I do not gather that he was a theologian, or complied more

than formally with the obligation of his orders. He came to Cambridge

when the Six Articles and the suppression of the monasteries were of

fresh and burning import: he became a Fellow in the harsh Protestant

days of Protector Somerset: and in all his time the Master and the

Fellows were in scarcely disavowed sympathy with the rites and beliefs

of the Old Religion. Yet in the battle of creeds I imagine that he

took no part and no interest. I should suppose that he was a somewhat

solitary man, an insatiable student of Nature, and that his sympathies

with humanity were starved by his absorption in the New Science which

dawned on Cambridge at the Reformation.

When I say that he was an alchemist do not suppose that in the middle

of the sixteenth century the name of alchemy carried with it any

associations with credulity or imposture. It was a real science and

a subject of University study then, as its god-children, Physics and

Chemistry, are now. If the aims of its professors were transcendental

its methods were genuinely based on research. Ffryar was no visionary,

but a man of sense, hard and practical. To the study of alchemy he was

drawn by no hopes of gain, not even of fame, and still less by any

desire to benefit mankind. He was actuated solely by an unquenchable

passion for enquiry, a passion sterilizing to all other feeling. To

the somnambulisms of the less scientific disciples of his school, such

as the philosopher’s stone and the elixir of life, he showed himself a

chill agnostic. All his thought and energies were concentrated on the

discovery of the _magisterium_, the master-cure of all human ailments.

For four years in his laboratory in the cloister he had toiled at

this pursuit. More than once, when it had seemed most near, it had

eluded his grasp; more than once he had been tempted to abandon it as

a mystery insoluble. In the summer of 1551 the discovery waited at his

door. He was sure, certain of success, which only experiment could

prove. And with the certainty arose a new passion in his heart--to make

the name of Ffryar glorious in the healing profession as that of Galen

or Hippocrates. In a few days, even within a few hours, the fame of his

discovery would go out into all the world.

The summer of 1551 was a sad time in Cambridge. It was marked by a more

than usually fatal outbreak of the epidemic called “the sweat,” when,

as Fuller says, “patients ended or mended in twenty-four hours.” It

had smouldered some time in the town before it appeared with sudden

and dreadful violence in Jesus College. The first to go was little

Gregory Graunge, schoolboy and chorister, who was lodged in the College

school in the outer court. He was barely thirteen years old, and known

by sight to Anthony Ffryar. He died on July 31, and was buried the

same day in Jesus churchyard. The service for his burial was held in

the Chapel and at night, as was customary in those days. Funerals in

College were no uncommon events in the sixteenth century. But in the

death of the poor child, among strangers, there was something to move

even the cold heart of Ffryar. And not the pity of it only impressed

him. The dim Chapel, the Master and Fellows obscurely ranged in their

stalls and shrouded in their hoods, the long-drawn miserable chanting

and the childish trebles of the boys who had been Gregory’s fellows

struck a chill into him which was not to be shaken off.

Three days passed and another chorister died. The College gates were

barred and guarded, and, except by a selected messenger, communication

with the town was cut off. The precaution was unavailing, and the boys’

usher, Mr. Stevenson, died on August 5. One of the junior Fellows,

sir Stayner--“sir” being the equivalent of B.A.--followed on August

7. The Master, Dr. Reston, died the next day. A gaunt, severe man was

Dr. Reston, whom his Fellows feared. The death of a Master of Arts on

August 9 for a time completed the melancholy list.

Before this the frightened Fellows had taken action. The scholars were

dismissed to their homes on August 6. Some of the Fellows abandoned the

College at the same time. The rest--a terrified conclave--met on August

8 and decreed that the College should be closed until the pestilence

should have abated. Until that time it was to be occupied by a certain

Robert Laycock, who was a College servant, and his only communication

with the outside world was to be through his son, who lived in Jesus

Lane. The decree was perhaps the result of the Master’s death, for he

was not present at the meeting.

Goodman Laycock, as he was commonly called, might have been the sole

tenant of the College but for the unalterable decision of Ffryar

to remain there. At all hazards his research, now on the eve of

realisation, must proceed; without the aid of his laboratory in College

it would miserably hang fire. Besides, he had an absolute assurance of

his own immunity if the experiment answered his confident expectations,

and his fancy was elated with the thought of standing, like another

Aaron, between the living and the dead, and staying the pestilence with

the potent _magisterium_. Until then he would bar his door even against

Laycock, and his supplies of food should be left on the staircase

landing. Solitude for him was neither unfamiliar nor terrible.

[Illustration: _The Master’s Stall._]

So for three days Ffryar and Laycock inhabited the cloister, solitary

and separate. For three days, in the absorption of his research,

Ffryar forgot fear, forgot the pestilence-stricken world beyond the

gate, almost forgot to consume the daily dole of food laid outside his

door. August 12 was the day, so fateful to humanity, when his labours

were to be crowned with victory: before midnight the secret of the

_magisterium_ would be solved.

Evening began to close in before he could begin the experiment which

was to be his last. It must of necessity be a labour of some hours,

and, before it began, he bethought him that he had not tasted food

since early morning. He unbarred his door and looked for the expected

portion. It was not there. Vexed at the remissness of Laycock he waited

for a while and listened for his approaching footsteps. At last he took

courage and descended to the cloister. He called for Laycock, but heard

no response. He resolved to go as far as the Buttery door and knock.

Laycock lived and slept in the Buttery.

At the Buttery door he beat and cried on Laycock; but in answer he

heard only the sound of scurrying rats. He went to the window, by the

hatch, where he knew that the old man’s bed lay, and called to him

again. Still there was silence. At last he resolved to force himself

through the unglazed window and take what food he could find. In the

deep gloom within he stumbled and almost fell over a low object, which

he made out to be a truckle-bed. There was light enough from the window

to distinguish, stretched upon it, the form of Goodman Laycock, stark

and dead.

Sickened and alarmed Ffryar hurried back to his chamber. More than ever

he must hasten the great experiment. When it was ended his danger would

be past, and he could go out into the town to call the buryers for the

old man. With trembling hands he lit the brazier which he used for his

experiments, laid it on his hearth and placed thereon the alembic which

was to distil the _magisterium_.

Then he sat down to wait. Gradually the darkness thickened and the

sole illuminant of the chamber was the wavering flame of the brazier.

He felt feverish and possessed with a nameless uneasiness which, for

all his assurance, he was glad to construe as fear: better that than

sickness. In the college and the town without was a deathly silence,

stirred only by the sweltering of the distilment, and, as the hours

struck, by the beating of the Chapel clock, last wound by Laycock. It

was as though the dead man spoke. But the repetition of the hours told

him that the time of his emancipation was drawing close.

Whether he slept I do not know. He was aroused to vivid consciousness

by the clock sounding _one_. The time when his experiment should have

ended was ten, and he started up with a horrible fear that it had been

ruined by his neglect. But it was not so. The fire burnt, the liquid

simmered quietly, and so far all was well.

Again the College bell boomed a solitary stroke: then a pause and

another. He opened, or seemed to open, his door and listened. Again

the knell was repeated. His mind went back to the night when he had

attended the obsequies of the boy-chorister. This must be a funeral

tolling. For whom? He thought with a shudder of the dead man in the

Buttery.

He groped his way cautiously down the stairs. It was a still, windless

night, and the cloister was dark as death. Arrived at the further side

of the court he turned towards the Chapel. Its panes were faintly

lighted from within. The door stood open and he entered.

In the place familiar to him at the chancel door one candle flickered

on a bracket. Close to it--his face cast in deep shade by the light

from behind--stood the ringer, in a gown of black, silent and absorbed

in his melancholy task. Fear had almost given way to wonder in the

heart of Ffryar, and, as he passed the sombre figure on his way to the

chancel door, he looked him resolutely in the face. The ringer was

Goodman Laycock.

Ffryar passed into the choir and quietly made his way to his accustomed

stall. Four candles burnt in the central walk about a figure laid on

trestles and draped in a pall of black. Two choristers--one on either

side--stood by it. In the dimness he could distinguish four figures,

erect in the stalls on either side of the Chapel. Their faces were

concealed by their hoods, but in the tall form which occupied the

Master’s seat it was not difficult to recognise Dr. Reston.

The bell ceased and the service began. With some faint wonder Ffryar

noted that it was the proscribed Roman Mass for the Dead. The solemn

introit was uttered in the tones of Reston, and in the deep responses

of the nearest cowled figure he recognised the voice of Stevenson, the

usher. None of the mourners seemed to notice Ffryar’s presence.

The dreary ceremony drew to a close. The four occupants of the

stalls descended and gathered round the palled figure in the aisle.

With a mechanical impulse, devoid of fear or curiosity, and with a

half-prescience of what he should see, Anthony Ffryar drew near and

uncovered the dead man’s face. He saw--himself.

At the same moment the last wailing notes of the office for the dead

broke from the band of mourners, and, one by one, the choristers

extinguished the four tapers.

“Requiem aeternam dona ei, Domine,” chanted the hooded four: and one

candle went out.

“Et lux perpetua luceat ei,” was the shrill response of the two

choristers: and a second was extinguished.

“Cum sanctis tuis in aeternum,” answered the four: and one taper only

remained.

The Master threw back his hood, and turned his dreadful eyes straight

upon the living Anthony Ffryar: he threw his hand across the bier

and held him tight. “Cras tu eris mecum,”[4] he muttered, as if in

antiphonal reply to the dirge-chanters.

With a hiss and a sputter the last candle expired.

* * * * *

The hiss and the sputter and a sudden sense of gloom recalled Ffryar

to the waking world. Alas for labouring science, alas for the fame

of Ffryar, alas for humanity, dying and doomed to die! The vessel

containing the wonderful brew which should have redeemed the world had

fallen over and dislodged its contents on the fire below. An accident

reparable, surely, within a few hours; but not by Anthony Ffryar.

How the night passed with him no mortal can tell. All that is known

further of him is written in the register of All Saints’ parish. If

you can discover the ancient volume containing the records of the

year 1551--and I am not positive that it now exists--you will find it

written:

“Die Augusti xiii

Buryalls in Jhesus churchyarde

Goodman Laycock }

Anthony Ffryar } of yᵉ sicknesse”

Tedious brief tales of Granta and Gramarye · 第 1 / 7 段