So matters stood for what remained of Henry's reign. As far

Produced by Paul Murray, Janet Blenkinship and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

ENGLISH SEAMEN

IN

THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY

_LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD EASTER TERMS 1893-4_

BY

JAMES ANTHONY FROUDE

LATE REGIUS PROFESSOR OF MODERN HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

New Edition

LONDON

LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 1896

[_All rights reserved_]

RICHARD CLAY & SONS, LIMITED, LONDON & BUNGAY.

CONTENTS

LECTURE PAGE

I. THE SEA CRADLE OF THE REFORMATION 1

II. JOHN HAWKINS AND THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE 35

III. SIR JOHN HAWKINS AND PHILIP THE SECOND 68

IV. DRAKE'S VOYAGE ROUND THE WORLD 102

V. PARTIES IN THE STATE 141

VI. THE GREAT EXPEDITION TO THE WEST INDIES 176

VII. ATTACK ON CADIZ 207

VIII. SAILING OF THE ARMADA 238

IX. DEFEAT OF THE ARMADA 272

LECTURE I

THE SEA CRADLE OF THE REFORMATION

Jean Paul, the German poet, said that God had given to France the empire

of the land, to England the empire of the sea, and to his own country

the empire of the air. The world has changed since Jean Paul's days. The

wings of France have been clipped; the German Empire has become a solid

thing; but England still holds her watery dominion; Britannia does still

rule the waves, and in this proud position she has spread the English

race over the globe; she has created the great American nation; she is

peopling new Englands at the Antipodes; she has made her Queen Empress

of India; and is in fact the very considerable phenomenon in the social

and political world which all acknowledge her to be. And all this she

has achieved in the course of three centuries, entirely in consequence

of her predominance as an ocean power. Take away her merchant fleets;

take away the navy that guards them: her empire will come to an end; her

colonies will fall off, like leaves from a withered tree; and Britain

will become once more an insignificant island in the North Sea, for the

future students in Australian and New Zealand universities to discuss

the fate of in their debating societies.

How the English navy came to hold so extraordinary a position is worth

reflecting on. Much has been written about it, but little, as it seems

to me, which touches the heart of the matter. We are shown the power of

our country growing and expanding. But how it grew, why, after a sleep

of so many hundred years, the genius of our Scandinavian forefathers

suddenly sprang again into life--of this we are left without

explanation.

The beginning was undoubtedly the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588.

Down to that time the sea sovereignty belonged to the Spaniards, and had

been fairly won by them. The conquest of Granada had stimulated and

elevated the Spanish character. The subjects of Ferdinand and Isabella,

of Charles V. and Philip II., were extraordinary men, and accomplished

extraordinary things. They stretched the limits of the known world; they

conquered Mexico and Peru; they planted their colonies over the South

American continent; they took possession of the great West Indian

islands, and with so firm a grasp that Cuba at least will never lose the

mark of the hand which seized it. They built their cities as if for

eternity. They spread to the Indian Ocean, and gave their monarch's name

to the _Philippines_. All this they accomplished in half a century, and,

as it were, they did it with a single hand; with the other they were

fighting Moors and Turks and protecting the coast of the Mediterranean

from the corsairs of Tunis and Constantinople.

They had risen on the crest of the wave, and with their proud _Non

sufficit orbis_ were looking for new worlds to conquer, at a time when

the bark of the English water-dogs had scarcely been heard beyond their

own fishing-grounds, and the largest merchant vessel sailing from the

port of London was scarce bigger than a modern coasting collier. And yet

within the space of a single ordinary life these insignificant islanders

had struck the sceptre from the Spaniards' grasp and placed the ocean

crown on the brow of their own sovereign. How did it come about? What

Cadmus had sown dragons' teeth in the furrows of the sea for the race to

spring from who manned the ships of Queen Elizabeth, who carried the

flag of their own country round the globe, and challenged and fought the

Spaniards on their own coasts and in their own harbours?

The English sea power was the legitimate child of the Reformation. It

grew, as I shall show you, directly out of the new despised

Protestantism. Matthew Parker and Bishop Jewel, the judicious Hooker

himself, excellent men as they were, would have written and preached to

small purpose without Sir Francis Drake's cannon to play an

accompaniment to their teaching. And again, Drake's cannon would not

have roared so loudly and so widely without seamen already trained in

heart and hand to work his ships and level his artillery. It was to the

superior seamanship, the superior quality of English ships and crews,

that the Spaniards attributed their defeat. Where did these ships come

from? Where and how did these mariners learn their trade? Historians

talk enthusiastically of the national spirit of a people rising with a

united heart to repel the invader, and so on. But national spirit could

not extemporise a fleet or produce trained officers and sailors to match

the conquerors of Lepanto. One slight observation I must make here at

starting, and certainly with no invidious purpose. It has been said

confidently, it has been repeated, I believe, by all modern writers,

that the Spanish invasion suspended in England the quarrels of creed,

and united Protestants and Roman Catholics in defence of their Queen and

country. They remind us especially that Lord Howard of Effingham, who

was Elizabeth's admiral, was himself a Roman Catholic. But was it so?

The Earl of Arundel, the head of the House of Howard, was a Roman

Catholic, and he was in the Tower praying for the success of Medina

Sidonia. Lord Howard of Effingham was no more a Roman Catholic than--I

hope I am not taking away their character--than the present Archbishop

of Canterbury or the Bishop of London. He was a Catholic, but an English

Catholic, as those reverend prelates are. Roman Catholic he could not

possibly have been, nor anyone who on that great occasion was found on

the side of Elizabeth. A Roman Catholic is one who acknowledges the

Roman Bishop's authority. The Pope had excommunicated Elizabeth, had

pronounced her deposed, had absolved her subjects from their allegiance,

and forbidden them to fight for her. No Englishman who fought on that

great occasion for English liberty was, or could have been, in communion

with Rome. Loose statements of this kind, lightly made, fall in with the

modern humour. They are caught up, applauded, repeated, and pass

unquestioned into history. It is time to correct them a little.

I have in my possession a detailed account of the temper of parties in

England, drawn up in the year 1585, three years before the Armada came.

The writer was a distinguished Jesuit. The account itself was prepared

for the use of the Pope and Philip, with a special view to the reception

which an invading force would meet with, and it goes into great detail.

The people of the towns--London, Bristol, &c.--were, he says, generally

heretics. The peers, the gentry, their tenants, and peasantry, who

formed the immense majority of the population, were almost universally

Catholics. But this writer distinguishes properly among Catholics. There

were the ardent impassioned Catholics, ready to be confessors and

martyrs, ready to rebel at the first opportunity, who had renounced

their allegiance, who desired to overthrow Elizabeth and put the Queen

of Scots in her place. The number of these, he says, was daily

increasing, owing to the exertions of the seminary priests; and plots,

he boasts, were being continually formed by them to murder the Queen.

There were Catholics of another sort, who were papal at heart, but went

with the times to save their property; who looked forward to a change in

the natural order of things, but would not stir of themselves till an

invading army actually appeared. But all alike, he insists, were eager

for a revolution. Let the Prince of Parma come, and they would all join

him; and together these two classes of Catholics made three-fourths of

the nation.

'The only party,' he says (and this is really noticeable), 'the only

party that would fight to death for the Queen, the only real friends she

had, were the _Puritans_ (it is the first mention of the name which I

have found), the Puritans of London, the Puritans of the sea towns.'

These he admits were dangerous, desperate, determined men. The numbers

of them, however, were providentially small.

The date of this document is, as I said, 1585, and I believe it

generally accurate. The only mistake is that among the Anglican

Catholics there were a few to whom their country was as dear as their

creed--a few who were beginning to see that under the Act of Uniformity

Catholic doctrine might be taught and Catholic ritual practised; who

adhered to the old forms of religion, but did not believe that obedience

to the Pope was a necessary part of them. One of these was Lord Howard

of Effingham, whom the Queen placed in his high command to secure the

wavering fidelity of the peers and country gentlemen. But the force, the

fire, the enthusiasm came (as the Jesuit saw) from the Puritans, from

men of the same convictions as the Calvinists of Holland and Rochelle;

men who, driven from the land, took to the ocean as their natural home,

and nursed the Reformation in an ocean cradle. How the seagoing

population of the North of Europe took so strong a Protestant impression

it is the purpose of these lectures to explain.

Henry VIII. on coming to the throne found England without a fleet, and

without a conscious sense of the need of one. A few merchant hulks

traded with Bordeaux and Cadiz and Lisbon; hoys and fly-boats drifted

slowly backwards and forwards between Antwerp and the Thames. A fishing

fleet tolerably appointed went annually to Iceland for cod. Local

fishermen worked the North Sea and the Channel from Hull to Falmouth.

The Chester people went to Kinsale for herrings and mackerel: but that

was all--the nation had aspired to no more.

Columbus had offered the New World to Henry VII. while the discovery was

still in the air. He had sent his brother to England with maps and

globes, and quotations from Plato to prove its existence. Henry, like a

practical Englishman, treated it as a wild dream.

The dream had come from the gate of horn. America was found, and the

Spaniard, and not the English, came into first possession of it. Still,

America was a large place, and John Cabot the Venetian with his son

Sebastian tried Henry again. England might still be able to secure a

slice. This time Henry VII. listened. Two small ships were fitted out at

Bristol, crossed the Atlantic, discovered Newfoundland, coasted down to

Florida looking for a passage to Cathay, but could not find one. The

elder Cabot died; the younger came home. The expedition failed, and no

interest had been roused.

With the accession of Henry VIII. a new era had opened--a new era in

many senses. Printing was coming into use--Erasmus and his companions

were shaking Europe with the new learning, Copernican astronomy was

changing the level disk of the earth into a revolving globe, and turning

dizzy the thoughts of mankind. Imagination was on the stretch. The

reality of things was assuming proportions vaster than fancy had dreamt,

and unfastening established belief on a thousand sides. The young Henry

was welcomed by Erasmus as likely to be the glory of the age that was

opening. He was young, brilliant, cultivated, and ambitious. To what

might he not aspire under the new conditions! Henry VIII. was all that,

but he was cautious and looked about him. Europe was full of wars in

which he was likely to be entangled. His father had left the treasury

well furnished. The young King, like a wise man, turned his first

attention to the broad ditch, as he called the British Channel, which

formed the natural defence of the realm. The opening of the Atlantic had

revolutionised war and seamanship. Long voyages required larger vessels.

Henry was the first prince to see the place which gunpowder was going

to hold in wars. In his first years he repaired his dockyards, built new

ships on improved models, and imported Italians to cast him new types of

cannon. 'King Harry loved a man,' it was said, and knew a man when he

saw one. He made acquaintance with sea captains at Portsmouth and

Southampton. In some way or other he came to know one Mr. William

Hawkins, of Plymouth, and held him in especial esteem. This Mr. Hawkins,

under Henry's patronage, ventured down to the coast of Guinea and

brought home gold and ivory; crossed over to Brazil; made friends with

the Brazilian natives; even brought back with him the king of those

countries, who was curious to see what England was like, and presented

him to Henry at Whitehall.

Another Plymouth man, Robert Thorne, again with Henry's help, went out

to look for the North-west passage which Cabot had failed to find.

Thorne's ship was called the _Dominus Vobiscum_, a pious aspiration

which, however, secured no success. A London man, a Master Hore, tried

next. Master Hore, it is said, was given to cosmography, was a

plausible talker at scientific meetings, and so on. He persuaded 'divers

young lawyers' (briefless barristers, I suppose) and other

gentlemen--altogether a hundred and twenty of them--to join him. They

procured two vessels at Gravesend. They took the sacrament together

before sailing. They apparently relied on Providence to take care of

them, for they made little other preparation. They reached Newfoundland,

but their stores ran out, and their ships went on shore. In the land of

fish they did not know how to use line and bait. They fed on roots and

bilberries, and picked fish-bones out of the ospreys' nests. At last

they began to eat one another--careless of Master Hore, who told them

they would go to unquenchable fire. A French vessel came in. They seized

her with the food she had on board and sailed home in her, leaving the

French crew to their fate. The poor French happily found means of

following them. They complained of their treatment, and Henry ordered an

inquiry; but finding, the report says, the great distress Master Hore's

party had been in, was so moved with pity, that he did not punish them,

but out of his own purse made royal recompense to the French.

Something better than gentlemen volunteers was needed if naval

enterprise was to come to anything in England. The long wars between

Francis I. and Charles V. brought the problem closer. On land the

fighting was between the regular armies. At sea privateers were let

loose out of French, Flemish, and Spanish ports. Enterprising

individuals took out letters of marque and went cruising to take the

chance of what they could catch. The Channel was the chief

hunting-ground, as being the highway between Spain and the Low

Countries. The interval was short between privateers and pirates.

Vessels of all sorts passed into the business. The Scilly Isles became a

pirate stronghold. The creeks and estuaries in Cork and Kerry furnished

hiding-places where the rovers could lie with security and share their

plunder with the Irish chiefs. The disorder grew wilder when the divorce

of Catherine of Aragon made Henry into the public enemy of Papal Europe.

English traders and fishing-smacks were plundered and sunk. Their crews

went armed to defend themselves, and from Thames mouth to Land's End the

Channel became the scene of desperate fights. The type of vessel altered

to suit the new conditions. Life depended on speed of sailing. The State

Papers describe squadrons of French or Spaniards flying about, dashing

into Dartmouth, Plymouth, or Falmouth, cutting out English coasters, or

fighting one another.

After Henry was excommunicated, and Ireland rebelled, and England itself

threatened disturbance, the King had to look to his security. He made

little noise about it. But the Spanish ambassador reported him as

silently building ships in the Thames and at Portsmouth. As invasion

seemed imminent, he began with sweeping the seas of the looser vermin. A

few swift well-armed cruisers pushed suddenly out of the Solent, caught

and destroyed a pirate fleet in Mount's Bay, sent to the bottom some

Flemish privateers in the Downs, and captured the Flemish admiral

himself. Danger at home growing more menacing, and the monks spreading

the fire which grew into the Pilgrimage of Grace, Henry suppressed the

abbeys, sold the lands, and with the proceeds armed the coast with

fortresses. 'You threaten me,' he seemed to say to them, 'that you will

use the wealth our fathers gave you to overthrow my Government and bring

in the invader. I will take your wealth, and I will use it to disappoint

your treachery.' You may see the remnants of Henry's work in the

fortresses anywhere along the coast from Berwick to the Land's End.

Louder thundered the Vatican. In 1539 Henry's time appeared to have

come. France and Spain made peace, and the Pope's sentence was now

expected to be executed by Charles or Francis, or both. A crowd of

vessels large and small was collected in the Scheldt, for what purpose

save to transport an army into England? Scotland had joined the Catholic

League. Henry fearlessly appealed to the English people. Catholic peers

and priests might conspire against him, but, explain it how we will, the

nation was loyal to Henry and came to his side. The London merchants

armed their ships in the river. From the seaports everywhere came armed

brigantines and sloops. The fishermen of the West left their boats and

nets to their wives, and the fishing was none the worse, for the women

handled oar and sail and line and went to the whiting-grounds, while

their husbands had gone to fight for their King. Genius kindled into

discovery at the call of the country. Mr. Fletcher of Rye (be his name

remembered) invented a boat the like of which was never seen before,

which would work to windward, with sails trimmed fore and aft, the

greatest revolution yet made in shipbuilding. A hundred and fifty sail

collected at Sandwich to match the armament in the Scheldt; and

Marillac, the French ambassador, reported with amazement the energy of

King and people.

The Catholic Powers thought better of it. This was not the England which

Reginald Pole had told them was longing for their appearance. The

Scheldt force dispersed. Henry read Scotland a needed lesson. The Scots

had thought to take him at disadvantage, and sit on his back when the

Emperor attacked him. One morning when the people at Leith woke out of

their sleep, they found an English fleet in the Roads; and before they

had time to look about them, Leith was on fire and Edinburgh was taken.

Charles V., if he had ever seriously thought of invading Henry, returned

to wiser counsels, and made an alliance with him instead. The Pope

turned to France. If the Emperor forsook him, the Most Christian King

would help. He promised Francis that if he could win England he might

keep it for himself. Francis resolved to try what he could do.

Five years had passed since the gathering at Sandwich. It was now the

summer of 1544. The records say that the French collected at Havre near

300 vessels, fighting ships, galleys, and transports. Doubtless the

numbers are far exaggerated, but at any rate it was the largest force

ever yet got together to invade England, capable, if well handled, of

bringing Henry to his knees. The plan was to seize and occupy the Isle

of Wight, destroy the English fleet, then take Portsmouth and

Southampton, and so advance on London.

Henry's attention to his navy had not slackened. He had built ship on

ship. The _Great Harry_ was a thousand tons, carried 700 men, and was

the wonder of the day. There were a dozen others scarcely less

imposing. The King called again on the nation, and again the nation

answered. In England altogether there were 150,000 men in arms in field

or garrison. In the King's fleet at Portsmouth there were 12,000 seamen,

and the privateers of the West crowded up eagerly as before. It is

strange, with the notions which we have allowed ourselves to form of

Henry, to observe the enthusiasm with which the whole country, as yet

undivided by doctrinal quarrels, rallied a second time to defend him.

In this Portsmouth fleet lay undeveloped the genius of the future naval

greatness of England. A small fact connected with it is worth recording.

The watchword on board was, 'God save the King'; the answer was, 'Long

to reign over us': the earliest germ discoverable of the English

National Anthem.

The King had come himself to Portsmouth to witness the expected attack.

The fleet was commanded by Lord Lisle, afterwards Duke of

Northumberland. It was the middle of July. The French crossed from Havre

unfought with, and anchored in St. Helens Roads off Brading Harbour.

The English, being greatly inferior in numbers, lay waiting for them

inside the Spit. The morning after the French came in was still and

sultry. The English could not move for want of wind. The galleys crossed

over and engaged them for two or three hours with some advantage. The

breeze rose at noon; a few fast sloops got under way and easily drove

them back. But the same breeze which enabled the English to move brought

a serious calamity with it. The Mary Rose, one of Lisle's finest

vessels, had been under the fire of the galleys. Her ports had been left

open, and when the wind sprang up, she heeled over, filled, and went

down, carrying two hundred men along with her. The French saw her sink,

and thought their own guns had done it. They hoped to follow up their

success. At night they sent over boats to take soundings, and discover

the way into the harbour. The boats reported that the sandbanks made the

approach impossible. The French had no clear plan of action. They tried

a landing in the island, but the force was too small, and failed. They

weighed anchor and brought up again behind Selsea Bill, where Lisle

proposed to run them down in the dark, taking advantage of the tide. But

they had an enemy to deal with worse than Lisle, on board their own

ships, which explained their distracted movements. Hot weather, putrid

meat, and putrid water had prostrated whole ships' companies with

dysentery. After a three weeks' ineffectual cruise they had to hasten

back to Havre, break up, and disperse. The first great armament which

was to have recovered England to the Papacy had effected nothing. Henry

had once more shown his strength, and was left undisputed master of the

narrow seas.

So matters stood for what remained of Henry's reign. As far as he had

gone, he had quarrelled with the Pope, and had brought the Church under

the law. So far the country generally had gone with him, and there had

been no violent changes in the administration of religion. When Henry

died the Protector abolished the old creed, and created a new and

perilous cleavage between Protestant and Catholic, and, while England

needed the protection of a navy more than ever, allowed the fine fleet

which Henry had left to fall into decay. The spirit of enterprise grew

with the Reformation. Merchant companies opened trade with Russia and

the Levant; adventurous sea captains went to Guinea for gold. Sir Hugh

Willoughby followed the phantom of the North-west Passage, turning

eastward round the North Cape to look for it, and perished in the ice.

English commerce was beginning to grow in spite of the Protector's

experiments; but a new and infinitely dangerous element had been

introduced by the change of religion into the relations of English

sailors with the Catholic Powers, and especially with Spain. In their

zeal to keep out heresy, the Spanish Government placed their harbours

under the control of the Holy Office. Any vessel in which an heretical

book was found was confiscated, and her crew carried to the Inquisition

prisons. It had begun in Henry's time. The Inquisitors attempted to

treat schism as heresy and arrest Englishmen in their ports. But Henry

spoke up stoutly to Charles V., and the Holy Office had been made to

hold its hand. All was altered now. It was not necessary that a poor

sailor should have been found teaching heresy. It was enough if he had

an English Bible and Prayer Book with him in his kit; and stories would

come into Dartmouth or Plymouth how some lad that everybody knew--Bill

or Jack or Tom, who had wife or father or mother among them,

perhaps--had been seized hold of for no other crime, been flung into a

dungeon, tortured, starved, set to work in the galleys, or burned in a

fool's coat, as they called it, at an _auto da fé_ at Seville.

The object of the Inquisition was partly political: it was meant to

embarrass trade and make the people impatient of changes which produced

so much inconvenience. The effect was exactly the opposite. Such

accounts when brought home created fury. There grew up in the seagoing

population an enthusiasm of hatred for that holy institution, and a

passionate desire for revenge.

The natural remedy would have been war; but the division of nations was

crossed by the division of creeds; and each nation had allies in the

heart of every other. If England went to war with Spain, Spain could

encourage insurrection among the Catholics. If Spain or France declared

war against England, England could help the Huguenots or the Holland

Calvinists. All Governments were afraid alike of a general war of

religion which might shake Europe in pieces. Thus individuals were left

to their natural impulses. The Holy Office burnt English or French

Protestants wherever it could catch them. The Protestants revenged their

injuries at their own risk and in their own way, and thus from Edward

VI.'s time to the end of the century privateering came to be the special

occupation of adventurous honourable gentlemen, who could serve God,

their country, and themselves in fighting Catholics. Fleets of these

dangerous vessels swept the Channel, lying in wait at Scilly, or even at

the Azores--disowned in public by their own Governments while secretly

countenanced, making war on their own account on what they called the

enemies of God. In such a business, of course, there were many mere

pirates engaged who cared neither for God nor man. But it was the

Protestants who were specially impelled into it by the cruelties of the

Inquisition. The Holy Office began the work with the _autos da fé_. The

privateers robbed, burnt, and scuttled Catholic ships in retaliation.

One fierce deed produced another, till right and wrong were obscured in

the passion of religious hatred. Vivid pictures of these wild doings

survive in the English and Spanish State Papers. Ireland was the rovers'

favourite haunt. In the universal anarchy there, a little more or a

little less did not signify. Notorious pirate captains were to be met in

Cork or Kinsale, collecting stores, casting cannon, or selling their

prizes--men of all sorts, from fanatical saints to undisguised ruffians.

Here is one incident out of many to show the heights to which temper had

risen.

'Long peace,' says someone, addressing the Privy Council early in

Elizabeth's time, 'becomes by force of the Spanish Inquisition more

hurtful than open war. It is the secret, determined policy of Spain to

destroy the English fleet, pilots, masters and sailors, by means of the

Inquisition. The Spanish King pretends he dares not offend the Holy

House, while we in England say we may not proclaim war against Spain in

revenge of a few. Not long since the Spanish Inquisition executed sixty

persons of St. Malo, notwithstanding entreaty to the King of Spain to

spare them. Whereupon the Frenchmen armed their pinnaces, lay for the

Spaniards, took a hundred and beheaded them, sending the Spanish ships

to the shore with their heads, leaving in each ship but one man to

render the cause of the revenge. Since which time Spanish Inquisitors

have never meddled with those of St. Malo.'

A colony of Huguenot refugees had settled on the coast of Florida. The

Spaniards heard of it, came from St. Domingo, burnt the town, and hanged

every man, woman, and child, leaving an inscription explaining that the

poor creatures had been killed, not as Frenchmen, but as heretics.

Domenique de Gourges, of Rochelle, heard of this fine exploit of

fanaticism, equipped a ship, and sailed across. He caught the Spanish

garrison which had been left in occupation and swung them on the same

trees--with a second scroll saying that they were dangling there, not as

Spaniards, but as murderers.

The genius of adventure tempted men of highest birth into the rovers'

ranks. Sir Thomas Seymour, the Protector's brother and the King's uncle,

was Lord High Admiral. In his time of office, complaints were made by

foreign merchants of ships and property seized at the Thames mouth. No

redress could be had; no restitution made; no pirate was even punished,

and Seymour's personal followers were seen suspiciously decorated with

Spanish ornaments. It appeared at last that Seymour had himself bought

the Scilly Isles, and if he could not have his way at Court, it was said

that he meant to set up there as a pirate chief.

The persecution under Mary brought in more respectable recruits than

Seymour. The younger generation of the western families had grown with

the times. If they were not theologically Protestant, they detested

tyranny. They detested the marriage with Philip, which threatened the

independence of England. At home they were powerless, but the sons of

honourable houses--Strangways, Tremaynes, Staffords, Horseys, Carews,

Killegrews, and Cobhams--dashed out upon the water to revenge the

Smithfield massacres. They found help where it could least have been

looked for. Henry II. of France hated heresy, but he hated Spain worse.

Sooner than see England absorbed in the Spanish monarchy, he forgot his

bigotry in his politics. He furnished these young mutineers with ships

and money and letters of marque. The Huguenots were their natural

friends. With Rochelle for an arsenal, they held the mouth of the

Channel, and harassed the communications between Cadiz and Antwerp. It

was a wild business: enterprise and buccaneering sanctified by religion

and hatred of cruelty; but it was a school like no other for seamanship,

and a school for the building of vessels which could out-sail all others

on the sea; a school, too, for the training up of hardy men, in whose

blood ran detestation of the Inquisition and the Inquisition's master.

Every other trade was swallowed up or coloured by privateering; the

merchantmen went armed, ready for any work that offered; the Iceland

fleet went no more in search of cod; the Channel boatmen forsook nets

and lines and took to livelier occupations; Mary was too busy burning

heretics to look to the police of the seas; her father's fine ships

rotted in harbour; her father's coast-forts were deserted or dismantled;

she lost Calais; she lost the hearts of her people in forcing them into

orthodoxy; she left the seas to the privateers; and no trade flourished,

save what the Catholic Powers called piracy.

When Elizabeth came to the throne, the whole merchant navy of England

engaged in lawful commerce amounted to no more than 50,000 tons. You may

see more now passing every day through the Gull Stream. In the service

of the Crown there were but seven revenue cruisers in commission, the

largest 120 tons, with eight merchant brigs altered for fighting. In

harbour there were still a score of large ships, but they were

dismantled and rotting; of artillery fit for sea work there was none.

The men were not to be had, and, as Sir William Cecil said, to fit out

ships without men was to set armour on stakes on the seashore. The

mariners of England were otherwise engaged, and in a way which did not

please Cecil. He was the ablest minister that Elizabeth had. He saw at

once that on the navy the prosperity and even the liberty of England

must eventually depend. If England were to remain Protestant, it was not

by articles of religion or acts of uniformity that she could be saved

without a fleet at the back of them. But he was old-fashioned. He

believed in law and order, and he has left a curious paper of

reflections on the situation. The ships' companies in Henry VIII.'s days

were recruited from the fishing-smacks, but the Reformation itself had

destroyed the fishing trade. In old times, Cecil said, no flesh was

eaten on fish days. The King himself could not have license. Now to eat

beef or mutton on fish days was the test of a true believer. The English

Iceland fishery used to supply Normandy and Brittany as well as England.

Now it had passed to the French. The Chester men used to fish the Irish

seas. Now they had left them to the Scots. The fishermen had taken to

privateering because the fasts of the Church were neglected. He saw it

was so. He recorded his own opinion that piracy, as he called it, was

_detestable_, and could not last. He was to find that it could last,

that it was to form the special discipline of the generation whose

business would be to fight the Spaniards. But he struggled hard against

the unwelcome conclusion. He tried to revive lawful trade by a

Navigation Act. He tried to restore the fisheries by Act of Parliament.

He introduced a Bill recommending godly abstinence as a means to virtue,

making the eating of meat on Fridays and Saturdays a misdemeanour, and

adding Wednesday as a half fish-day. The House of Commons laughed at him

as bringing back Popish mummeries. To please the Protestants he inserted

a clause, that the statute was politicly meant for the increase of

fishermen and mariners, not for any superstition in the choice of meats;

but it was no use. The Act was called in mockery 'Cecil's Fast,' and the

recovery of the fisheries had to wait till the natural inclination of

human stomachs for fresh whiting and salt cod should revive of itself.

Events had to take their course. Seamen were duly provided in other

ways, and such as the time required. Privateering suited Elizabeth's

convenience, and suited her disposition. She liked daring and adventure.

She liked men who would do her work without being paid for it, men whom

she could disown when expedient; who would understand her, and would not

resent it. She knew her turn was to come when Philip had leisure to deal

with her, if she could not secure herself meanwhile. Time was wanted to

restore the navy. The privateers were a resource in the interval. They

might be called pirates while there was formal peace. The name did not

signify. They were really the armed force of the country. After the war

broke out in the Netherlands, they had commissions from the Prince of

Orange. Such commissions would not save them if taken by Spain, but it

enabled them to sell their prizes, and for the rest they trusted to

their speed and their guns. When Elizabeth was at war with France about

Havre, she took the most noted of them into the service of the Crown.

Ned Horsey became Sir Edward and Governor of the Isle of Wight;

Strangways, a Red Rover in his way, who had been the terror of the

Spaniards, was killed before Rouen; Tremayne fell at Havre, mourned over

by Elizabeth; and Champernowne, one of the most gallant of the whole of

them, was killed afterwards at Coligny's side at Moncontour.

But others took their places: the wild hawks as thick as seagulls

flashing over the waves, fair wind or foul, laughing at pursuit, brave,

reckless, devoted, the crews the strangest medley: English from the

Devonshire and Cornish creeks, Huguenots from Rochelle; Irish kernes

with long skenes, 'desperate, unruly persons with no kind of mercy.'

The Holy Office meanwhile went on in cold, savage resolution: the Holy

Office which had begun the business and was the cause of it.

A note in Cecil's hand says that in the one year 1562 twenty-six English

subjects had been burnt at the stake in different parts of Spain. Ten

times as many were starving in Spanish dungeons, from which

occasionally, by happy accident, a cry could be heard like this which

follows. In 1561 an English merchant writes from the Canaries:

'I was taken by those of the Inquisition twenty months past, put into a

little dark house two paces long, loaded with irons, without sight of

sun or moon all that time. When I was arraigned I was charged that I

should say our mass was as good as theirs; that I said I would rather

give money to the poor than buy Bulls of Rome with it. I was charged

with being a subject to the Queen's grace, who, they said, was enemy to

the Faith, Antichrist, with other opprobrious names; and I stood to the

defence of the Queen's Majesty, proving the infamies most untrue. Then I

was put into Little Ease again, protesting very innocent blood to be

demanded against the judge before Christ.'

The innocent blood of these poor victims had not to wait to be avenged

at the Judgment Day. The account was presented shortly and promptly at

the cannon's mouth.

LECTURE II

JOHN HAWKINS AND THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE

I begin this lecture with a petition addressed to Queen Elizabeth.

Thomas Seely, a merchant of Bristol, hearing a Spaniard in a Spanish

port utter foul and slanderous charges against the Queen's character,

knocked him down. To knock a man down for telling lies about Elizabeth

might be a breach of the peace, but it had not yet been declared heresy.

The Holy Office, however, seized Seely, threw him into a dungeon, and

kept him starving there for three years, at the end of which he

contrived to make his condition known in England. The Queen wrote

herself to Philip to protest. Philip would not interfere. Seely remained

in prison and in irons, and the result was a petition from his wife, in

which the temper which was rising can be read as in letters of fire.

Dorothy Seely demands that 'the friends of her Majesty's subjects so

imprisoned and tormented in Spain may make out ships at their proper

charges, take such Inquisitors or other Papistical subjects of the King

of Spain as they can by sea or land, and retain them in prison with such

torments and diet as her Majesty's subjects be kept with in Spain, and

on complaint made by the King to give such answer as is now made when

her Majesty sues for subjects imprisoned by the Inquisition. Or that a

Commission be granted to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the other

bishops word for word for foreign Papists as the Inquisitors have in

Spain for the Protestants. So that all may know that her Majesty cannot

and will not longer endure the spoils and torments of her subjects, and

the Spaniards shall not think this noble realm dares not seek revenge of

such importable wrongs.'

Elizabeth issued no such Commission as Dorothy Seely asked for, but she

did leave her subjects to seek their revenge in their own way, and they

sought it sometimes too rashly.

In the summer of 1563 eight English merchantmen anchored in the roads

of Gibraltar. England and France were then at war. A French brig came in

after them, and brought up near. At sea, if they could take her, she

would have been a lawful prize. Spaniards under similar circumstances

had not respected the neutrality of English harbours. The Englishmen

were perhaps in doubt what to do, when the officers of the Holy Office

came off to the French ship. The sight of the black familiars drove the

English wild. Three of them made a dash at the French ship, intending to

sink her. The Inquisitors sprang into their boat, and rowed for their

lives. The castle guns opened, and the harbour police put out to

interfere. The French ship, however, would have been taken, when

unluckily Alvarez de Baçan, with a Spanish squadron, came round into the

Straits. Resistance was impossible. The eight English ships were

captured and carried off to Cadiz. The English flag was trailed under De

Baçan's stern. The crews, two hundred and forty men in all, were

promptly condemned to the galleys. In defence they could but say that

the Frenchman was an enemy, and a moderate punishment would have

sufficed for a violation of the harbour rules which the Spaniards

themselves so little regarded. But the Inquisition was inexorable, and

the men were treated with such peculiar brutality that after nine months

ninety only of the two hundred and forty were alive.

Ferocity was answered by ferocity. Listen to this! The Cobhams of

Cowling Castle were Protestants by descent. Lord Cobham was famous in

the Lollard martyrology. Thomas Cobham, one of the family, had taken to

the sea like many of his friends. While cruising in the Channel he

caught sight of a Spaniard on the way from Antwerp to Cadiz with forty

prisoners on board, consigned, it might be supposed, to the Inquisition.

They were, of course, Inquisition prisoners; for other offenders would

have been dealt with on the spot. Cobham chased her down into the Bay of

Biscay, took her, scuttled her, and rescued the captives. But that was

not enough. The captain and crew he sewed up in their own mainsail and

flung them overboard. They were washed ashore dead, wrapped in their

extraordinary winding-sheet. Cobham was called to account for this

exploit, but he does not seem to have been actually punished. In a very

short time he was out and away again at the old work. There were plenty

with him. After the business at Gibraltar, Philip's subjects were not

safe in English harbours. Jacques le Clerc, a noted privateer, called

Pie de Palo from his wooden leg, chased a Spaniard into Falmouth, and

was allowed to take her under the guns of Pendennis. The Governor of the

castle said that he could not interfere, because Le Clerc had a

commission from the Prince of Condé. It was proved that in the summer of

1563 there were 400 English and Huguenot rovers in and about the

Channel, and that they had taken 700 prizes between them. The Queen's

own ships followed suit. Captain Cotton in the _Phoenix_ captured an

Antwerp merchantman in Flushing. The harbour-master protested. Cotton

laughed, and sailed away with his prize. The Regent Margaret wrote in

indignation to Elizabeth. Such insolence, she said, was not to be

endured. She would have Captain Cotton chastised as an example to all

others. Elizabeth measured the situation more correctly than the Regent;

she preferred to show Philip that she was not afraid of him. She

preferred to let her subjects discover for themselves that the terrible

Spaniard before whom the world trembled was but a colossus stuffed with

clouts. Until Philip consented to tie the hands of the Holy Office she

did not mean to prevent them from taking the law into their own hands.

Now and then, if occasion required, Elizabeth herself would do a little

privateering on her own account. In the next story that I have to tell

she appears as a principal, and her great minister, Cecil, as an

accomplice. The Duke of Alva had succeeded Margaret as Regent of the

Netherlands, and was drowning heresy in its own blood. The Prince of

Orange was making a noble fight; but all went ill with him. His troops

were defeated, his brother Louis was killed. He was still struggling,

helped by Elizabeth's money. But the odds were terrible, and the only

hope lay in the discontent of Alva's soldiers, who had not been paid

their wages, and would not fight without them. Philip's finances were

not flourishing, but he had borrowed half a million ducats from a house

at Genoa for Alva's use. The money was to be delivered in bullion at

Antwerp. The Channel privateers heard that it was coming and were on the

look-out for it. The vessel in which it was sent took refuge in

Plymouth, but found she had run into the enemy's nest. Nineteen or

twenty Huguenot and English cruisers lay round her with commissions from

Condé to take every Catholic ship they met with. Elizabeth's special

friends thought and said freely that so rich a prize ought to fall to no

one but her Majesty. Elizabeth thought the same, but for a more

honourable reason. It was of the highest consequence that the money

should not reach the Duke of Alva at that moment. Even Cecil said so,

and sent the Prince of Orange word that it would be stopped in some way.

But how could it decently be done? Bishop Jewel relieved the Queen's

mind (if it was ever disturbed) on the moral side of the question. The

bishop held that it would be meritorious in a high degree to intercept a

treasure which was to be used in the murder of Protestant Christians.

But the how was the problem. To let the privateers take it openly in

Plymouth harbour would, it was felt, be a scandal. Sir Arthur

Champernowne, the Vice-admiral of the West, saw the difficulty and

offered his services. He had three vessels of his own in Condé's

privateer fleet, under his son Henry. As vice-admiral he was first in

command at Plymouth. He placed a guard on board the treasure ship,

telling the captain it would be a discredit to the Queen's Government if

harm befell her in English waters. He then wrote to Cecil.

'If,' he said, 'it shall seem good to your honour that I with others

shall give the attempt for her Majesty's use which cannot be without

blood, I will not only take it in hand, but also receive the blame

thereof unto myself, to the end so great a commodity should redound to

her Grace, hoping that, after bitter storms of her displeasure, showed

at the first to colour the fact, I shall find the calm of her favour in

such sort as I am most willing to hazard myself to serve her Majesty.

Great pity it were such a rich booty should escape her Grace. But surely

I am of that mind that anything taken from that wicked nation is both

necessary and profitable to our commonwealth.'

Very shocking on Sir Arthur's part to write such a letter: so many good

people will think. I hope they will consider it equally shocking that

King Philip should have burned English sailors at the stake because they

were loyal to the laws of their own country; that he was stirring war

all over Europe to please the Pope, and thrusting the doctrines of the

Council of Trent down the throats of mankind at the sword's point. Spain

and England might be at peace; Romanism and Protestantism were at deadly

war, and war suspends the obligations of ordinary life. Crimes the most

horrible were held to be virtues in defence of the Catholic faith. The

Catholics could not have the advantage of such indulgences without the

inconveniences. The Protestant cause throughout Europe was one, and

assailed as the Protestants were with such envenomed ferocity, they

could not afford to be nicely scrupulous in the means they used to

defend themselves.

Sir Arthur Champernowne was not called on to sacrifice himself in such

peculiar fashion, and a better expedient was found to secure Alva's

money. The bullion was landed and was brought to London by road on the

plea that the seas were unsafe. It was carried to the Tower, and when it

was once inside the walls it was found to remain the property of the

Genoese until it was delivered at Antwerp. The Genoese agent in London

was as willing to lend it to Elizabeth as to Philip, and indeed

preferred the security. Elizabeth calmly said that she had herself

occasion for money, and would accept their offer. Half of it was sent to

the Prince of Orange; half was spent on the Queen's navy.

Alva was of course violently angry. He arrested every English ship in

the Low Countries. He arrested every Englishman that he could catch, and

sequestered all English property. Elizabeth retaliated in kind. The

Spanish and Flemish property taken in England proved to be worth double

what had been secured by Alva. Philip could not declare war. The

Netherlands insurrection was straining his resources, and with Elizabeth

for an open enemy the whole weight of England would have been thrown on

the side of the Prince of Orange. Elizabeth herself should have

declared war, people say, instead of condescending to such tricks.

Perhaps so; but also perhaps not. These insults, steadily maintained and

unresented, shook the faith of mankind, and especially of her own

sailors, in the invincibility of the Spanish colossus.

English Seamen in the Sixteenth Century Lectures Delivered at Oxford Easter Terms 1893-4 · 第 1 / 13 段