CHAPTER I

Produced by Suzanne Shell, Janet Blenkinship and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

GALLIPOLI DIARY

BY GENERAL SIR IAN HAMILTON, G.C.B.

AUTHOR OF "A STAFF-OFFICER'S SCRAP-BOOK," ETC.

WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS

IN TWO VOLUMES

VOL. I

NEW YORK GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY 1920

PRINTED BY UNWIN BROTHERS, LTD.--WOKING--ENGLAND

PREFACE

On the heels of the South African War came the sleuth-hounds pursuing

the criminals, I mean the customary Royal Commissions. Ten thousand

words of mine stand embedded in their Blue Books, cold and dead as so

many mammoths in glaciers. But my long spun-out intercourse with the

Royal Commissioners did have living issue--my Manchurian and Gallipoli

notes. Only constant observation of civilian Judges and soldier

witnesses could have shown me how fallible is the unaided military

memory or have led me by three steps to a War Diary:--

(1) There is nothing certain about war except that one side won't win.

(2) The winner is asked no questions--the loser has to answer for

everything.

(3) Soldiers think of nothing so little as failure and yet, to the

extent of fixing intentions, orders, facts, dates firmly in their own

minds, they ought to be prepared.

Conclusion:--In war, keep your own counsel, preferably in a note-book.

The first test of the new resolve was the Manchurian Campaign, 1904-5;

and it was a hard test. Once that Manchurian Campaign was over I never

put pen to paper--in the diary sense[1]--until I was under orders for

Constantinople. Then I bought a note-book as well as a Colt's automatic

(in fact, these were the only two items of special outfit I did buy),

and here are the contents--not of the auto but of the book. Also, from

the moment I took up the command, I kept cables, letters and copies

(actions quite foreign to my natural disposition), having been taught in

my youth by Lord Roberts that nothing written to a Commander-in-Chief,

or his Military Secretary, can be private if it has a bearing on

operations. A letter which may influence the Chief Command of an Army

and, therefore, the life of a nation, may be "Secret" for reasons of

State; it cannot possibly be "Private" for personal reasons.[2]

At the time, I am sure my diary was a help to me in my work. The

crossings to and from the Peninsula gave me many chances of reckoning up

the day's business, sometimes in clear, sometimes in a queer cipher of

my own. Ink stands with me for an emblem of futurity, and the act of

writing seemed to set back the crisis of the moment into a calmer

perspective. Later on, the diary helped me again, for although the

Dardanelles Commission did not avail themselves of my formal offer to

submit what I had written to their scrutiny, there the records were.

Whenever an event, a date and a place were duly entered in their actual

coincidence, no argument to the contrary could prevent them from falling

into the picture: an advocate might just as well waste eloquence in

disputing the right of a piece to its own place in a jig-saw puzzle.

Where, on the other hand, incidents were not entered, anything might

happen and did happen; _vide_, for instance, the curious misapprehension

set forth in the footnotes to pages 59, 60, Vol. II.

So much for the past. Whether these entries have not served their turn

is now the question. They were written red-hot amidst tumult, but

faintly now, and as in some far echo, sounds the battle-cry that once

stopped the beating of thousands of human hearts as it was borne out

upon the night wind to the ships. Those dread shapes we saw through our

periscopes are dust: "the pestilence that walketh in darkness" and "the

destruction that wasteth at noonday" are already images of speech: only

the vastness of the stakes; the intensity of the effort and the grandeur

of the sacrifice still stand out clearly when we, in dreams, behold the

Dardanelles. Why not leave that shining impression as a martial cloak to

cover the errors and vicissitudes of all the poor mortals who, in the

words of Thucydides, "dared beyond their strength, hazarded against

their judgment, and in extremities were of an excellent hope?"

Why not? The tendency of every diary is towards self-justification and

complaint; yet, to-day, personally, I have "no complaints." Would it not

be wiser, then, as well as more dignified, to let the Dardanelles

R.I.P.? The public will not be starved. A Dardanelles library exists---

nothing less--from which three luminous works by Masefield, Nevinson and

Callwell stand out; works each written by a man who had the right to

write; each as distinct from its fellow as one primary colour from

another, each essentially true. On the top of these comes the Report of

the Dardanelles Commission and the Life of Lord Kitchener, where his

side of the story is so admirably set forth by his intimate friend, Sir

George Arthur. The tale has been told and retold. Every morsel of the

wreckage of our Armada seems to have been brought to the surface. There

are fifty reasons against publishing, reasons which I know by heart. On

the other side there are only three things to be said:--

(1) Though the bodies recovered from the tragedy have been stripped and

laid out in the Morgue, no hand has yet dared remove the masks from

their faces.

(2) I cannot destroy this diary. Before his death Cranmer thrust his own

hand into the flames: "his heart was found entire amidst the ashes."

(3) I will not leave my diary to be flung at posterity from behind the

cover of my coffin. In case anyone wishes to challenge anything I have

said, I must be above ground to give him satisfaction.

Therefore, I will publish and at once.

A man has only one life on earth. The rest is silence. Whether God will

approve of my actions at a moment when the destinies of hundreds of

millions of human beings hung upon them, God alone knows. But before I

go I want to have the verdict of my comrades of all ranks at the

Dardanelles, and until they know the truth, as it appeared to me at the

time, how can they give that verdict?

IAN HAMILTON.

LULLENDEN FARM,

DORMANSLAND.

_April_ 25, 1920.

LETTER FROM GENERAL D'AMADE TO THE AUTHOR

MON GÉNÉRAL,

Dans la guerre Sud Africaine, ensuite en Angleterre, j'avais en

spectateur vécu avec votre armée. Avec elle je souhaitais revivre en

frère d'armes, combattant pour la même cause.

Les Dardanelles ont réalisé mon rêve. Mais le lecteur ne doit pas

s'attarder avec moi. Lire le récit de celui même qui a commandé: quel

avantage! L'Histoire, comme un fleuve, se charge d'impuretés en

s'éloignent de ses sources. En en remontant le cours, dans votre

Journal, j'ai découvert les causes de certains effets demeuré, pour moi

des énigmes.

Au début je n'avais pas cru à la possibilité de forcer les Dardanelles

sans l'intervention de l'armée. C'est pour cela que, si la décision

m'eût appartenus et avant d'avoir été placé sous vos ordres, j'avais

songé à débarquer à Adramit, dans les eaux calmes de Mithylène, à courir

ensuite à Brousse et Constantinople, pour y saisir les clefs du détroit.

En présence de l'opiniâtre confiance de l'amiral de Robecq j'abaissai

mon pavillion de terrien et l'inclinai devant son autorité de marin

Anglais. Nous fûmes conquis par cette confiance.

Notre théâtre de guerre de Gallipoli était très borné sur le terrain. Ce

front restreint a permis à chacun de vos soldats de vous connaître.

Autant qu'avec leurs armes, ils combattaient avec votre ardeur de grand

chef et votre inflexible volonté.

Dans le passé ce théâtre qui était la Troade, venait se souder aux

éternels récommencements de l'Histoire.

Dans l'avenir son domaine était aussi vaste. "Si nos navires avaient pu

franchir les détroits, a dit le Premier Ministre Loyd Georges le 18

décembre 1919 aux Communes, la guerre aurait été raccourcie de 2 ou 3

ans."

Il y a pire qu'une guerre, c'est une guerre qui se prolonge. Car les

dévastations s'accumulent. Le vaincu qui a eu l'habileté de les éviter à

son pays, se donnera, sur les ruines, des manières de vainqueur. Le

premier but de guerre n'est il pas d'infliger à l'adversaire plus de mal

qu'il ne vous en fait?

Si nous avions atteint Constantinople dans l'été 1915 c'était alors

terminer la guerre, éviter la tourmente russe et tous les obstacles

dressés par ce cataclysme devant le rétablissement de la paix du monde.

C'était épargner à nos Patries des milliards de dépenses et des

centaines de milliers de deuils.

Que nous n'ayons pas atteint ce but ne saurait établir qu'il n'ait été

juste et sage de le poursuivre.

Voilà pour quelle cause sont tombés les soldats des Dardanelles.

"Honneur à vous, soldats de France et soldats du Roi! ainsi que vous

les adjuriez en les lançant à l'attaque.

"Morts héroïques! il n'a rien manqué à votre gloire, pas même une

apparence d'oubli. Des triomphes des autres vous n'avez recueilli que

les rayons extrêmes: ceux qui ont franchi la cime des arcs de triomphe

pour aller au loin, coups égarés de la grande gerbe, éclairer vos

tombés.

"Mais 'Ne jugez pas avant le temps.' Le crépuscule éteint, laissez

encore passer la nuit. Vous aurez pour vous le soleil Levant."

Vous, Mon Général, vous aurez été l'ouvrier de cette grande idée, et

l'annonciateur de cette aurore.

Gén. A. d'Amade.

Fronsac,

Gironde, France.

22 décembre, 1919.

CONTENTS

PAGE

PREFACE v

LETTER FROM GENERAL D'AMADE TO THE AUTHOR x

CHAPTER

I. THE START 1

II. THE STRAITS 21

III. EGYPT 54

IV. CLEARING FOR ACTION 86

V. THE LANDING 127

VI. MAKING GOOD 159

VII. SHELLS 196

VIII. TWO CORPS OR AN ALLY? 219

IX. SUBMARINES 243

X. A DECISION AND THE PLAN 283

XI. BOMBS AND JOURNALISTS 314

XII. A VICTORY AND AFTER 343

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

SIR ROGER KEYES, VICE-ADMIRAL DE ROBECK, SIR IAN HAMILTON, GENERAL

BRAITHWAITE _Frontispiece_

LIEUT.-GEN. SIR J.G. MAXWELL, G.C.B., K.C.M.G 58

REVIEW OF FRENCH TROOPS AT ALEXANDRIA 78

S.S. "RIVER CLYDE" 132

"W" BEACH 176

GENERAL D'AMADE 222

VIEW OF "V" BEACH, TAKEN FROM S.S. "RIVER CLYDE" 254

MEN BATHING AT HELLES 294

THE NARROWS FROM CHUNUK BAIR 330

GENERAL GOURAUD 346

MAPS

KEY MAP _Inside front cover_

CAPE HELLES AND THE SOUTHERN AREA _At end of volume_

GALLIPOLI DIARY

CHAPTER I

THE START

_In the train between Paris and Marseilles, 14th March, 1915._

Neither the Asquith banquet, nor the talk at the Admiralty that midnight

had persuaded me I was going to do what I am actually doing at this

moment. K. had made no sign nor waved his magic baton. So I just kept as

cool as I could and had a sound sleep.

Next morning, that is the 12th instant, I was working at the Horse

Guards when, about 10 a.m., K. sent for me. I wondered! Opening the door

I bade him good morning and walked up to his desk where he went on

writing like a graven image. After a moment, he looked up and said in a

matter-of-fact tone, "We are sending a military force to support the

Fleet now at the Dardanelles, and you are to have Command."

Something in voice or words touched a chord in my memory. We were once

more standing, K. and I, in our workroom at Pretoria, having just

finished reading the night's crop of sixty or seventy wires. K. was

saying to me, "You had better go out to the Western Transvaal." I asked

no question, packed up my kit, ordered my train, started that night. Not

another syllable was said on the subject. Uninstructed and unaccredited

I left that night for the front; my outfit one A.D.C., two horses, two

mules and a buggy. Whether I inspected the columns and came back and

reported to K. in my capacity as his Chief Staff Officer; or, whether,

making use of my rank to assume command in the field, I beat up de la

Rey in his den--all this rested entirely with me.

So I made my choice and fought my fight at Roodewal, last strange battle

in the West. That is K.'s way. The envoy goes forth; does his best with

whatever forces he can muster and, if he loses;--well, unless he had

liked the job he should not have taken it on.

At that moment K. wished me to bow, leave the room and make a start as I

did some thirteen years ago. But the conditions were no longer the same.

In those old Pretoria days I had known the Transvaal by heart; the

number, value and disposition of the British forces; the characters of

the Boer leaders; the nature of the country. But my knowledge of the

Dardanelles was nil; of the Turk nil; of the strength of our own forces

next to nil. Although I have met K. almost every day during the past six

months, and although he has twice hinted I might be sent to Salonika;

never once, to the best of my recollection, had he mentioned the word

Dardanelles.

I had plenty of time for these reflections as K., after his one

tremendous remark had resumed his writing at the desk. At last, he

looked up and inquired, "Well?"

"We have done this sort of thing before, Lord K." I said; "we have run

this sort of show before and you know without saying I am most deeply

grateful and you know without saying I will do my best and that you can

trust my loyalty--but I must say something--I must ask you some

questions." Then I began.

K. frowned; shrugged his shoulders; I thought he was going to be

impatient, but although he gave curt answers at first he slowly

broadened out, until, at the end, no one else could get a word in

edgeways.[3]

My troops were to be Australians and New Zealanders under Birdwood (a

friend); strength, say, about 30,000. (A year ago I inspected them in

their own Antipodes and no finer material exists); the 29th Division,

strength, say 19,000 under Hunter-Weston--a slashing man of action; an

acute theorist; the Royal Naval Division, 11,000 strong (an excellent

type of Officer and man, under a solid Commander--Paris); a French

contingent, strength at present uncertain, say, about a Division, under

my old war comrade the chivalrous d'Amade, now at Tunis.

Say then grand total about 80,000--probably panning out at some 50,000

rifles in the firing line. Of these the 29th Division are

extras--_division de luxe._

K. went on; he was now fairly under weigh and got up and walked about

the room as he spoke. I knew, he said, his (K.'s) feelings as to the

political and strategic value of the Near East where one clever tactical

thrust delivered on the spot and at the spot might rally the wavering

Balkans. Rifle for rifle, _at that moment_, we could nowhere make as

good use of the 29th Division as by sending it to the Dardanelles, where

each of its 13,000 rifles might attract a hundred more to our side of

the war. Employed in France or Flanders the 29th would at best help to

push back the German line a few miles; at the Dardanelles the stakes

were enormous. He spoke, so it struck me, as if he was defending himself

in argument: he asked if I agreed. I said, "Yes." "Well," he rejoined,

"You may just as well realize at once that G.H.Q. in France do not

agree. They think they have only to drive the Germans back fifty miles

nearer to their base to win the war. Those are the same fellows who used

to write me saying they wanted no New Army; that they would be amply

content if only the old Old Army and the Territorials could be kept up

to strength. Now they've been down to Aldershot and seen the New Army

they are changing their tune, but I am by no means sure, _now_, that

I'll give it to them. French and his Staff believe firmly that the

British Imperial Armies can pitch their camp down in one corner of

Europe and there fight a world war to a finish. The thing is absurd but

French, plus France, are a strong combine and they are fighting tooth

and nail for the 29th Division. It must clearly be understood then:--"

(1) That the 29th Division are only to be a loan and are to be returned

the moment they can be spared.

(2) That all things ear-marked for the East are looked on by powerful

interests both at home and in France as having been stolen from the

West.

Did I take this in? I said, "I take it from you." Did I myself, speaking

as actual Commander of the Central Striking Force and executively

responsible for the land defence of England, think the 29th Division

could be spared at all? "Yes," I said, "and four more Territorial

Divisions as well." K. used two or three very bad words and added, with

his usual affability, that I would find myself walking about in civilian

costume instead of going to Constantinople if he found me making any

wild statements of that sort to the politicians. I laughed and reminded

him of my testimony before the Committee of Imperial Defence about my

Malta amphibious manoeuvres; about the Malta Submarines and the way

they had destroyed the battleships conveying my landing forces. If there

was any politician, I said, who cared a hang about my opinions he knew

quite well already my views on an invasion of England; namely, that it

would be like trying to hurt a monkey by throwing nuts at him. I didn't

want to steal what French wanted, but now that the rifles had come and

the troops had finished their musketry, there was no need to squabble

over a Division. Why not let French have two of my Central Force

Territorial Division at once,--they were jolly good and were wasting

their time over here. That would sweeten French and he and Joffre would

make no more trouble about the 29th.

K. glared at me. I don't know what he was going to say when Callwell

came into the room with some papers.

We moved to the map in the window and Callwell took us through a plan of

attack upon the Forts at the Dardanelles, worked out by the Greek

General Staff. The Greeks had meant to employ (as far as I can remember)

150,000 men. Their landing was to have taken place on the North-west

coast of the Southern part of the Peninsula, opposite Kilid Bahr. "But,"

said K., "half that number of men will do you handsomely; the Turks are

busy elsewhere; I hope you will not have to land at all; if you _do_

have to land, why then the powerful Fleet at your back will be the prime

factor in your choice of time and place."

I asked K. if he would not move the Admiralty to work a submarine or two

up the Straits at once so as to prevent reinforcements and supplies

coming down by sea from Constantinople. By now the Turks must be on the

alert and it was commonsense to suppose they would be sending some sort

of help to their Forts. However things might pan out we could not be

going wrong if we made the Marmora unhealthy for the Turkish ships. Lord

K. thereupon made the remark that if we could get one submarine into the

Marmora the defences of the Dardanelles would collapse. "Supposing," he

said, "one submarine pops up opposite the town of Gallipoli and waves a

Union Jack three times, the whole Turkish garrison on the Peninsula will

take to their heels and make a bee line for Bulair."

In reply to a question about Staff, Lord K., in the gruff voice he puts

on when he wants no argument, told me I could not take my own Chief of

Staff, Ellison, and that Braithwaite would go with me in his place.

Ellison and I have worked hand in glove for several years; our qualities

usefully complement one another; there was no earthly reason I could

think of why Ellison should _not_ have come with me, but; I like

Braithwaite; he had been on my General Staff for a time in the Southern

Command; he is cheery, popular and competent.

Wolfe Murray, the Chief of the Imperial General Staff, was then called

in, also Archie Murray, Inspector of Home Forces, and Braithwaite. This

was the first (apparently) either of the Murrays had heard of the

project!!! Both seemed to be quite taken aback, and I do not remember

that either of them made a remark.

Braithwaite was very nice and took a chance to whisper his hopes he

would not give me too much cause to regret Ellison. He only said one

thing to K. and that produced an explosion. He said it was vital that we

should have a better air service than the Turks in case it came to

fighting over a small area like the Gallipoli Peninsula: he begged,

therefore, that whatever else we got, or did not get, we might be fitted

out with a contingent of up-to-date aeroplanes, pilots and observers. K.

turned on him with flashing spectacles and rent him with the words,

_"Not one_!"

_15th March, 1915. H.M.S. "Phaeton." Toulon Harbour._ Embarked at

Marseilles last night at 6 p.m. and slept on board. Owing to some

mistake no oil fuel had been taken aboard so we have had to come round

here this morning to get it. Have just breakfasted with the Captain,

Cameron by name, and have let the Staff go ashore to see the town. We do

not sail till 2 p.m.: after special trains and everything a clean

chuck-away of 20 hours.

I left off in the S. of S.'s room at the War Office. After the bursting

of the aeroplane bomb K. did most of the talking. I find it hard to

remember all he said: here are the outstanding points:--

(1) We soldiers are to understand we are string Number 2. The sailors

are sure they can force the Dardanelles on their own and the whole

enterprise has been framed on that basis: we are to lie low and to bear

in mind the Cabinet does not want to hear anything of the Army till it

sails through the Straits. But if the Admiral fails, then we will have

to go in.

(2) If the Army has to be used, whether on the Bosphorus or at the

Dardanelles, I am to bear in mind his order that no serious operation is

to take place until the whole of my force is complete; ready;

concentrated and on the spot. No piecemeal attack is to be made.

(3) If we do start fighting, once we _have_ started we are to burn our

boats. Once landed the Government are resolved to see the enterprise

through.

(4) Asia is out of bounds. K. laid special stress on this. Our sea

command and the restricted area of Gallipoli would enable us to

undertake a landing on the Peninsula with clearly limited liabilities.

Once we began marching about continents, situations calling for heavy

reinforcements would probably be created. Although I, Hamilton, seemed

ready to run risks in the defence of London, he, K., was not, and as he

had already explained, big demands would make his position difficult

with France; difficult everywhere; and might end by putting him (K.) in

the cart. Besika Bay and Alexandretta were, therefore, taboo--not to be

touched! Even after we force the Narrows no troops are to be landed

along the Asian coastline. Nor are we to garrison any part of the

Gallipoli Peninsula excepting only the Bulair Lines which had best be

permanently held, K. thinks, by the Naval Division.

When we get into the Marmora I shall be faced by a series of big

problems. What would I do? From what quarter could I attack

Constantinople? How would I hold it when I had taken it? K. asked me

the questions.

With the mud of prosaic Whitehall drying upon my boots these remarks of

K.'s sounded to me odd. But, knowing Constantinople, and--what was more

to the point at the moment--knowing K.'s hatred of hesitation, I managed

to pull myself together so far as to suggest that if the city was weakly

held and if, as he had said, (I forgot to enter that) the bulk of the

Thracian troops were dispersed throughout the Provinces, or else moving

to re-occupy Adrianople, why then, possibly, by a _coup de main_, we

might pounce upon the Chatalja Lines from the South before the Turks

could climb back into them from the North. Lord K. made a grimace; he

thought this too chancy. The best would be if we did not land a man

until the Turks had come to terms. Once the Fleet got through the

Dardanelles, Constantinople could not hold out. Modern Constantinople

could not last a week if blockaded by sea and land. That was a sure

thing; a thing whereon he could speak with full confidence. The Fleet

could lie off out of sight and range of the Turks and with their guns

would dominate the railways and, if necessary, burn the place to ashes.

The bulk of the people were not Osmanli or even Mahomedan and there

would be a revolution at the mere sight of the smoke from the funnels of

our warships. But if, for some cause at present non-apparent, we were

forced to put troops ashore against organized Turkish opposition, then

he advocated a landing on the Asiatic side of the Bosphorus to hold out

a hand to the Russians, who would simultaneously land there from the

Black Sea. He only made the suggestion, for the man on the spot must be

the best judge. Several of the audience left us here, at Lord K.'s

suggestion, to get on with their work. K. went on:--

The moment the holding of Constantinople comes along the French and the

Russians will be very jealous and prickly. Luckily we British have an

easy part to play as the more we efface ourselves at that stage, the

better he, K., will be pleased. The Army in France have means of making

their views work in high places and pressure is sure to be put on by

them and by their friends for the return of the 29th and Naval Divisions

the moment we bring Turkey to book. Therefore, it will be best in any

case to "let the French and Russians garrison Constantinople and sing

their hymns in S. Sophia," whilst my own troops hold the railway line

and perhaps Adrianople. Thus they will be at a loose end and we shall be

free to bring them back to the West; to land them at Odessa or to push

them up the Danube, without weakening the Allied grip on the waterway

linking the Mediterranean with the Black Sea.

This was the essence of our talk: as it lasted about an hour and a half,

I can only have put down about one tenth of it.

At odd times I have been recipient of K.'s reveries but always,

_always_, he has rejected with a sort of horror the idea of being War

Minister or Commander-in-Chief. Now by an extreme exercise of its ironic

spirit, Providence has made him both.

In pre-war days, when we met in Egypt and at Malta, K. made no bones

about what he wanted. He wanted to be Viceroy of India or Ambasssador at

Constantinople.

I remember very well one conversation we had when I asked him why he

wanted to hang on to great place, and whether he had not done enough

already. He said he could not bear to see India being mismanaged by

nincompoops or our influence in Turkey being chucked out of the window

with both hands: I answered him, I remember, by saying there were only

two things worth doing as Viceroy and they would not take very long. One

was to put a huge import duty on aniline dyes and so bring back the

lovely vegetable dyes of old India, the saffrons, indigoes, madders,

etc.; the other was to build a black marble Taj at Agra opposite the

white and join the two by a silver bridge. I expected to get a rise, but

actually he took the ideas quite seriously and I am sure made a mental

note of them. Anyway, as Viceroy, K. would have flung the whole vast

weight of India into the scale of this war; he would have poured Army

after Army from East to West. Under K. India could have beaten Turkey

single-handed; aye, and with one arm tied behind her back. With K. as

Ambassador at Constantinople he would have prevented Turkey coming into

the war. There is no doubt of it. Neither Enver Pasha nor Talaat would

have dared to enrage K., and as for the idea of their deporting him, it

is grotesque. They might have shot him in the back; they could never

have faced him with a war declaration in their hands. As an impresser

of Orientals he is a nonesuch. So we put him into the War Office in the

ways of which he is something of an amateur, with a big prestige and a

big power of drive. Yes, we remove the best experts from the War Office

and pop in K. like a powerful engine from which we have removed all

controls, regulators and safety valves. Yet see what wonders he has

worked!

Still, he remains, in the War Office sense, an amateur. The Staff left

by French at the W.O. may not have been von Moltke's, but they were K.'s

only Councillors. An old War Office hand would have used them. But in no

case, even had they been the best, could K. have had truck or parley

with any system of decentralization of work--of semi-independent

specialists each running a show of his own. As late (so-called) Chief of

Staff to Lord K. in South Africa, I could have told them that whatever

work K. fancies at the moment he must swipe at it, that very moment, off

his own bat. The one-man show carried on royally in South Africa and all

the narrow squeaks we had have been completely swallowed up in the final

success; but how will his no-system system work now? Perhaps he may pull

it through; anyway he is starting with a beautifully cleaned slate. He

has surpassed himself, in fact, for I confess even with past experience

to guide me, I did not imagine our machinery could have been so

thoroughly smashed in so short a time. Ten long years of General Staff;

Lyttelton, Nicholson, French, Douglas; where are your well-thought-out

schemes for an amphibious attack on Constantinople? Not a sign!

Braithwaite set to work in the Intelligence Branch at once. But beyond

the ordinary text books those pigeon holes were drawn blank. The

Dardanelles and Bosphorus might be in the moon for all the military

information I have got to go upon. One text book and one book of

travellers' tales don't take long to master and I have not been so free

from work or preoccupation since the war started. There is no use trying

to make plans unless there is some sort of material, political, naval,

military or geographical to work upon.

Winston had been in a fever to get us off and had ordered a special

train for that very afternoon. My new Staff were doubtful if they could

get fixed up so quickly and K. settled the matter by saying there was no

need to hustle. For myself, I was very keen to get away. The best plan

to save slips between cup and lip is to swallow the liquor. But K.

thought it wisest to wait, so I 'phoned over to Eddie to let Winston

know we should not want his train that day.

Next morning, the 13th, I handed over the Central Force Command to

Rundle and then, at 10.30 went in with Braithwaite to say good-bye. K.

was standing by his desk splashing about with his pen at three different

drafts of instructions. One of them had been drafted by Fitz--I suppose

under somebody's guidance; the other was by young Buckley; the third K.

was working on himself. Braithwaite, Fitz and I were in the room; no one

else except Callwell who popped in and out. The instructions went over

most of the ground of yesterday's debate and were too vague. When I

asked the crucial question:--the enemy's strength? K. thought I had

better be prepared for 40,000. How many guns? No one knows. Who was in

command? Djavad Pasha, it is believed. But, K. says, I may take it that

the Kilid Bahr Plateau has been entrenched and is sufficiently held.

South of Kilid Bahr to the point at Cape Helles, I may take it that the

Peninsula is open to a landing on very easy terms. The cross fire from

the Fleet lying part in the Aegean and part in the mouth of the Straits

must sweep that flat and open stretch of country so as to render it

untenable by the enemy. Lord K. demonstrated this cross fire upon the

map. He toiled over the wording of his instructions. They were headed

"Constantinople Expeditionary Force." I begged him to alter this to

avert Fate's evil eye. He consented and both this corrected draft and

the copy as finally approved are now in Braithwaite's despatch box more

modestly headed "Mediterranean Expeditionary Force." None of the drafts

help us with facts about the enemy; the politics; the country and our

allies, the Russians. In sober fact these "instructions" leave me to my

own devices in the East, almost as much as K.'s laconic order "git" left

me to myself when I quitted Pretoria for the West thirteen years ago.

So I said good-bye to old K. as casually as if we were to meet together

at dinner. Actually my heart went out to my old Chief. He was giving me

the best thing in his gift and I hated to leave him amongst people who

were frightened of him. But there was no use saying a word. He did not

even wish me luck and I did not expect him to, but he did say, rather

unexpectedly, _after_ I had said good-bye and just as I was taking up my

cap from the table, "If the Fleet gets through, Constantinople will fall

of itself and you will have won, not a battle, but the war."

At 5 o'clock that afternoon we bade adieu to London. Winston was

disappointed we didn't dash away yesterday but we have not really let

much grass grow under our feet. He and some friends came down to Charing

Cross to see us off. I told Winston Lord K. would not think me loyal if

I wrote to another Secretary of State. He understood and said that if I

wanted him to be aware of some special request all I had to say was,

"You will agree perhaps that the First Lord should see." Then the S. of

S. for War would be bound to show him the letter:--which proves that

with all his cleverness Winston has yet some points to learn about his

K. of K.!

My Staff still bear the bewildered look of men who have hurriedly been

snatched from desks to do some extraordinary turn on some unheard of

theatre. One or two of them put on uniform for the first time in their

lives an hour ago. Leggings awry, spurs upside down, belts over shoulder

straps! I haven't a notion of who they all are: nine-tenths of my few

hours of warning has been taken up in winding up the affairs of the

Central Force.

At Dover embarked on H.M.S. _Foresight_,--a misnomer, for we ran into a

fog and had to lie-to for a devil of a time. Heard far-off guns on

French front,--which was cheering.

At 10.30 p.m. we left Calais for Marseilles and during the next day the

French authorities caused me to be met by Officers of their Railway

Mobilization Section. Had my first breathing space wherein to talk over

matters with Braithwaite, and he and I tried to piece together the

various scraps of views we had picked up at the War Office into a

pattern which should serve us for a doctrine. But we haven't got very

much to go upon. A diagram he had drawn up with half the spaces unfilled

showing the General Staff. Another diagram with its blank spaces only

showed that our Q. branch was not in being. Three queried names,

Woodward for A.G., Winter for Q.M.G. and Williams for Cipher Officer.

The first two had been left behind, the third was with us. The following

hurried jottings by Braithwaite:--"Only 1600 rounds for the 4.5

Howitzers!!! High Explosive essential. Who is to be C.R.E.? Engineer

Stores? French are to remain at Tunis until the day comes that they are

required. Egyptian troops also remain in Egypt till last moment.

Everything we want by 30th (it is hoped). Await arrival of 29th Division

before undertaking anything big. If Carden wants military help it is for

Sir Ian's consideration whether to give or to withhold it." These rough

notes; the text book on the Turkish Army, and two small guide books: not

a very luminous outfit. Braithwaite tells me our force are not to take

with them the usual 10 per cent. extra margin of reserves to fill

casualties. Wish I had realised this earlier. He had not time to tell

me he says. The General Staff thought we ought certainly to have these

and he and Wolfe Murray went in and made a personal appeal to the A.G.

But he was obdurate. This seems hard luck. Why should we not have our

losses quickly replaced--supposing we do lose men? I doubt though, if I

should have been able to do very much even if I had known. To press K.

would have been difficult. Like insisting on an extra half-crown when

you've just been given Fortunatus' purse. Still, fair play's a jewel,

and surely if formations destined for the French front cross the Channel

with 10 per cent. extra, over and above their establishment, troops

bound for Constantinople ought to have a 25 per cent. margin over

establishment?

_17th March, 1915. H.M.S. "Phaeton." At sea._ Last night we raced past

Corfu--my birthplace--at thirty knots an hour. My first baby breath was

drawn from these thyme scented breezes. This crimson in the Eastern sky,

these waves of liquid opal are natal, vital.

Thirty miles an hour through Paradise! Since the 16th January, 1853, we

have learnt to go the pace and as a result the world shrinks; the

horizons close in upon us; the spacious days are gone!

Thoughts of my Mother, who died when I was but three. Thoughts of her

refusal as she lay dying--gasping in mortal pain--her refusal to touch

an opiate, because the Minister, Norman Macleod, had told her she so

might dim the clearness of her spiritual insight--of her thoughts

ascending heavenwards. What pluck--what grit--what faith--what an

example to a soldier.

Exquisite, exquisite air; sea like an undulating carpet of blue velvet

outspread for Aphrodite. Have been in the Aegean since dawn. At noon

passed a cruiser taking back Admiral Carden invalided to Malta. One week

ago the thunder of his guns shook the firm foundations of the world. Now

a sheer hulk lies poor old Carden. _Vanitas vanitatum_.

Have got into touch with my staff. They are all General Staff: no

Administrative Staff. The Adjutant-General-to-be (I don't know him) and

the Chief Medico (I don't know who he is to be) could not get ready in

time to come off with us, and the Q.M.G., too, was undecided when I

left. There are nine of the General Staff. I like the looks of them.

Quite characteristic of K., though, that barring Braithwaite, not one of

the associates he has told off to work hand in glove with me in this

enterprise should ever have served with me before.

Only two sorts of Commanders-in-Chief could possibly find time to

scribble like this on their way to take up an enterprise in many ways

unprecedented--a German and a Britisher. The first, because every

possible contingency would have been worked out for him beforehand; the

second, because he has nothing--literally nothing--in his portfolio

except a blank cheque signed with those grand yet simple words--John

Bull. The German General is the product of an organising nation. The

British General is the product of an improvising nation. Each army would

be better commanded by the other army's General. Sounds fantastic but is

true.[4]

Gallipoli Diary, Volume 1 · 第 1 / 12 章