Butler, in his Hudibras, says, of medical quacks, they

Seek out for plants, with signatures,

To quack of universal cures.

In the Spectator, Addison has this observation--"At the first appearance,

that a French quack made in Paris, a boy walked before him, publishing,

with a shrill voice, '_my father cures all sorts of distempers_;' to which

the doctor added, in a grave manner, '_what the boy says is true_.'"

The imposture of James Aymar, to which I have alluded, was of a different

kind. Aymar was an ignorant peasant of Dauphine. He finally confessed

himself to be an impostor, before the Prince of Conde; and the whole

affair is narrated, by the apothecary of the prince, in a _Lettre a M.

L'Abbe, D. L., sur les veritables effets de la baguette de Jaques Aymar

par P. Buissiere; chez Louis Lucas, a Paris, 1694_.

The power of this fellow's wand was not limited, to the discovery of

hidden treasures, or springs of water; nor were his only dupes the lowly

and the ignorant. As I have said, he was detected, and made a full

confession, before the Prince of Conde. The magistrates published an

official account of the imposture; yet such is the energy of the credulous

principle, that M. Vallemont, a man of note, published a treatise "_on the

occult philosophy of the divining wand_;" in which he tries to show, that

Aymar, notwithstanding his mistakes, before the Prince, was really

possessed of all the wonderful power he claimed, of divining with his

wand. The measure of this popular credulity will be better understood,

after perusing the following translation of an extract from the _Mercure

Historique_, for April, 1697, page 440.--"The Prior of the Carthusians

passed through Villeneuve with Aymar, to discover, by the aid of his wand,

some landmarks, that were lost. Just before, a foundling had been left on

the steps of the monastery. Aymar was employed, by the Superior, to find

out the father. Followed by a great crowd, and guided by the indications

of his wand, he went to the village of Comaret, in the County of

Venaissin, and thence to a cottage, where he affirmed the child was born."

Bayle says, on the authority of another letter from M. Buissiere, in 1698,

that Aymar's apparent simplicity, and rustic dialect, and the rapid motion

of his wand went far, to complete the delusion. He was also exceedingly

devout, and never absent from mass, or confession. While he was at Paris,

and before his exposure, the Pythoness, herself, would not have been more

frequently, and zealously consulted, than was this crafty and ignorant

boor, by the Parisians. Fees showered in from all quarters; and he was

summoned, in all directions, to detect thieves; recover lost property;

settle the question of genuine identity, among the relics of _prima facie_

saints, in different churches; and, in truth, no limit was set, by his

innumerable dupes, to the power of his miraculous wand. "I myself," says

M. Buissiere, "saw a simple, young fellow, a silk weaver, who was engaged

to a girl, give Aymar a couple of crowns, to know if she were a virgin."

Joseph Francis Borri flourished, about the middle of the seventeenth

century, and a most complicated scoundrel he was--heresiarch, traitor,

alchymist, and empiric. He had spiritual revelations, of course. He was an

intelligent and audacious liar, and converts came in apace. At his

suggestion, his followers took upon themselves an oath of poverty, and

placed all they possessed in the hands of Borri, who told them he would

take care it should never again interfere with their devotions, but would

be spent in prayers and masses, for their ulcerated souls. The bloodhounds

of the Inquisition were soon upon his track, at the moment he was about to

raise the standard of insurrection in Milan.

He fled to Amsterdam--made capital of his persecution by the Inquisition;

and won the reputation of a great chemist, and wonderful physician. He

then went to Hamburg, and persuaded Queen Christina, to advance him a

large sum of money, to be reimbursed, from the avails of the philosopher's

stone, which Borri was to discover. This trick was clearly worth

repeating. So thought Borri; and he tried it, with still better success,

on his Majesty of Denmark. Still the stone remained undiscovered; and the

thought occurred to Signor Borri, that it might not be amiss, to look for

it, in Turkey. He accordingly removed; but was arrested at Vienna, by the

Pope's agents; and consigned to the prisons of the Inquisition, for life.

His fame, however, had become so omnipotent, that, upon the earnest

application of the Duke d'Etree, he was let loose, to prescribe for that

nobleman, whom the regular physicians had given over. The Duke got well,

and the world gave Borri the credit of the cure. When a poor suffering

mortal is given over, in other words, _let alone_, by half a dozen

doctors--I am speaking now of the regulars, not less than of the

volunteers--he, occasionally, gets well.

A wit replied to a French physician, who was marvelling how a certain Abbe

came to die, since he himself and three other physicians were unremitting,

in their attentions--"_My dear doctor, how could the poor abbe sustain

himself, against you all four?_" The doctors do much as they did of old.

Pliny, lib. xxix. 5, says, of consultations--"_Hinc illae circa aegros

miserae sententiarum concertationes, nullo idem censente ne videatur

accessio alterius. Hinc illa infelicis monumenti inscriptio_, TURBA SE

MEDICORUM PERIISSE." Hence those contemptible consultations, round the

beds of the sick--no one assenting to the opinion of another, lest he

should be deemed his subaltern. Hence the monumental inscription, over the

poor fellow, who was destroyed in this way--KILLED BY A MOB OF DOCTORS!

Who has not seen a fire rekindle, _sua sponte_, after the officious

bellows have, apparently, extinguished the last spark? So, now and then,

the vital spark, stimulated by the _vis medicatrix naturae_ will rekindle

into life and action, after having been well nigh smothered, by all sorts

of complicated efforts to restore it.

This is the _punctum instans_, the very nick of time, for the charlatan:

in he comes, looking insufferably wise, and brim full of sympathetic

indignation. All has been done wrong, of course. While he affects to be

doing everything, he does exactly nothing--stirs up an invisible,

impalpable, infinitessimal, incomprehensible particle, in a little water,

which the patient can neither see, feel, taste, nor smell. Down it goes.

The patient's faith, as to the size of it, rather resembles a cocoanut

than a grain of mustard seed. His confidence in the _new_ doctor is as

gigantic, and as blind, as Polyphemus, after he had been _gouged_, by him

of Ithaca. He plants his galvanic grasp, upon the wrist of the little

doctor, much in the manner of a drowning man, clutching at a full grown

straw. He is absolutely better already. The wife and the little ones look

upon the mountebank, as their preserver from widowhood and orphanage.

"_Dere ish noting_," he says, "_like de leetil doshes_;" and he takes his

leave, regretting, as he closes the door, that his sleeve is not large

enough, to hold the sum total of his laughter. Yet some of these quacks

become _honest men_; and, however surprised at the result, they are

finally unable, to resist the force of the popular outcry, in their own

favor. They almost forget their days of duplicity, and small things--they

arrive, somehow or other, at the conclusion, that, however unexpectedly,

they are great men, and their wild tactics a system. They use longer

words, move into larger houses, and talk of first principles: and all the

practice of a neighborhood finally falls into the hands of Dr. Ninkempaup

or Dr. Pauketpeeker.

Francis Joseph Borri died, in prison, in 1695. Sorbiere in his _Voiage en

Angleterre_, page 158, describes him thus--"He is a cunning blade; a

lusty, dark-complexioned, good-looking fellow, well dressed, and lives at

considerable expense, though not at such a rate, as some suppose; for

eight or ten thousand livres will go a great way at Amsterdam. But a

house, worth 15,000 crowns, in a fine location, five or six footmen, a

French suit of clothes, a treat or two to the ladies, the occasional

refusal of fees, five or six rix dollars distributed, at the proper time

and place among the poor, a spice of insolence in discourse, and sundry

other artifices have made some credulous persons say, that he gave away

handfulls of diamonds, that he had discovered the philosophers stone, and

the universal medicine." When he was in Amsterdam, he appeared in a

splendid equipage, was accosted, by the title of "_your excellence_," and

they talked of marrying him to one of the greatest fortunes.

I have no taste for unsocial pleasures. Will the reader go with me to

Franklin Place--let us take our station near No. 2, and turn our eyes to

the opposite side--let us put back the hand of the world's timekeeper,

some thirty years. A showy chariot, very peculiar, very yellow, and

abundantly supplied with glass, with two tall bay horses, gaudily

harnessed, is driven to the door of the mansion, by a coachman, in livery;

and there it stands; till, after the expiration of an hour, perhaps, the

house door is flung open, and there appears, upon the steps, a tall, dark

visaged, portly personage, in black, who, looking slowly up and down the

avenue, proceeds, with great deliberation, to draw on his yellow, buckskin

gloves. Rings glitter upon his fingers; seals, keys, and safety chain,

upon his person. His beaver, of an unusual form, is exquisitely glossy,

surpassed, by nothing but the polish of his tall suwarrows, surmounted

with black, silk tassels.

He descends to the vehicle--the door is opened, with a bow of profound

reverence, which is scarcely acknowledged, and in he gets, the very fac

simile of a Spanish grandee. The chariot moves off, so very slowly, that

we can easily follow it, on foot--on it goes, up Franklin, and down

Washington, up Court, into Tremont, down School, into Washington, along

Washington, up Winter, and through Park to Beacon Street, where it halts,

before the mansion of some respectable citizen. The occupant alights, and,

leaving his chariot there, proceeds, through obscure and winding ways, to

visit his patients, on foot, in the purlieus of _La Montagne_.

This was no other than the celebrated patentee of the famous bug liquid;

who was forever putting the community on its guard, by admonishing the

pill-taking public, that they _could not be too particular_, for _none

were genuine, unless signed W. T. Conway_.

No. CXIV.

Charity began at home--I speak of Charity Shaw, the famous root and herb

doctress, who was a great blessing to all undertakers, in this city, for

many years--her practice was, at first, purely domestic--she began at

home, in her own household; and, had she ended there, it had fared better,

doubtless, with many, who have received the final attentions of our craft.

The mischief of quackery is negative, as well as positive. Charity could

not be fairly classed with those reckless empirics, who, rather than lose

the sale of a nostrum, will send you directly to the devil, for a dollar:

Charity was kind, though she vaunted herself a little in the newspapers.

She was, now and then, rather severely handled, but she bore all things,

and endured all things, and hoped all things; for, to do her justice, she

was desirous, that her patients should recover: and, if she believed not

all things, her patients did; and therein consisted the negative

mischief--in that stupid credulity, which led them to follow this poor,

ignorant, old woman, and thus prevented them, from applying for relief,

where, if anywhere, in this uncertain world, it may be found--at the

fountains of knowledge and experience. In Charity's day, there were

several root and herb practitioners; but the greatest of these was

Charity.

Herb doctors have, for some two thousand years, attempted to turn back the

tables, upon the faculty--they are a species of _garde mobile_, who have

an old grudge against the _corps regulier_: for they have not forgotten,

that, some two thousand years ago, herb doctors had all things pretty much

in their own way. Two entire books, the twenty-sixth and twenty-seventh of

Pliny's Natural History, are devoted to a consideration of the medicinal

properties of herbs--the twentieth treats of the medicinal properties of

vegetables--the twenty-third and twenty-fourth of the medicinal properties

of roots and barks. Thus, we see, of what importance these simples were

accounted, in the healing art, in that early age. Herbs, barks, and roots

were, and, for ages, had been, the principal _materia medica_, and were

employed, by the different sects--by the Rationalists, of whom Pliny, lib.

xxvi. cap. 6, considers Herophilus the head, though this honor is

ascribed, by Galen, to Hippocrates--the Empirics, or experimentalists--and

the Methodics, who avoided all actions, for _mala praxis_, by adhering to

the rules. Pliny manifestly inclined to herb doctoring. In the chapter,

just now referred to, after alluding to the _verba, garrulitatemque_ of

certain lecturers, he intimates, that they and their pupils had an easy

time of it--_sedere namque his in scholis auditioni operatos gratius erat,

quam ire in solitudines, et quoerere herbas alias aliis diebus anni_--for

it was pleasanter to sit, listening in the lecture-rooms, than to run

about in the fields and woods, culling certain simples, on certain days in

the year.

Herb doctors were destined to be overthrown; and the account, given by

Pliny, in chapters 7, 8 and 9, book xxvi. of the sudden and complete

revolution, in the practice of the healing art, is curious and

interesting.

Asclepiades, of Prusa, in Bythinia, came to Rome, in the time of Pompey

the Great, about one hundred years before Christ, to teach rhetoric; and,

like an impudent hussy, who came to this city, as a cook, from Vermont,

some years ago, and, not succeeding, in that capacity, but hearing, that

wet nurses obtained high wages here, prepared herself, for that lucrative

occupation--so Asclepiades, not succeeding, as a rhetorician, prepared

himself for a doctor. He was ignorant of the whole matter; but a man of

genius; and, as he knew nothing of root and herb practice, he determined

to cut up the whole system root and branch, and substitute one of his

own--_torrenti ac meditata quotidie oratione blandiens omnia abdicavit:

totamque medicinam ad causam revocando, conjecturae fecit_. By the power of

his forcible and preconcerted orations, pronounced from day to day, in a

smooth and persuasive manner, he overthrew the whole; and, bringing back

the science of medicine to cause and effect, he constructed a system of

inference or conjecture. Pliny is not disposed to be altogether pleased

with Asclepiades, though he recounts his merits fairly. He says of

him--_Id solum possumus indignari, unum hominem, e levissima gente, sine

ullis opibus orsum, vectigalis sua causa, repente leges salutis humano

genere dedisse, quas tamen postea abrogavere multi_--at least, we may feel

rather indignant, that one, born among a people, remarkable for their

levity, born also in poverty, toiling for his daily support, should thus

suddenly lay down, for the human race, the laws of health, which,

nevertheless, many rejected afterwards.

Now it seems to me, that Asclepiades was a very clever fellow; and I

think, upon Pliny's own showing, there was more reason, for indignation,

against a people, who had so long tolerated the marvellous absurdities of

the herb system, such as it then was, than against a man, who had the good

sense to perceive, and the courage and perseverance to explode, them. What

there was in the poverty of Asclepiades, or in the character of his

countrymen, to rouse Pliny's indignation, I cannot conceive. Pliny says,

lib. xxvi. cap. 9, after naming several things, which promoted this great

change, in the practice of Physic--_Super omnia adjuvere eum magicae

vanitates, in tantum erectae, ut abrogare herbis fidem cunctis possent_. He

was especially assisted in his efforts, by the excesses, to which the

magical absurdities had been carried, in respect to herbs, so that they

alone were enough to destroy all confidence, in such things.

Pliny proceeds to narrate some of these magical absurdities--the plant

AEthiops, thrown into lakes and rivers, would dry them up--the touch of it

would open everything, that was shut. The Achaemenis, cast among the enemy,

would cause immediate flight. The Latace would ensure plenty. Josephus

also, De Bell, Ind. lib. vii. cap. 25--speaks of an excellent root for

driving out devils.

Pliny says, Asclepiades laid down five important

particulars--_abstinentiam cibi_, _alias vini_, _fricationem corporis_,

_ambulationem_, _gestationes_--abstinence from meat, and, at other times,

from wine, friction of the body, walking, and various kinds of gestation,

on horseback, and otherwise. There were some things, in the old practice,

_nimis anxia et rudia_, too troublesome and coarse, whose rejection

favored the new doctor greatly, _obruendi agros veste sudoresque omni modo

ciendi; nunc corpora ad ignes torrendi_, etc.--smothering the sick in

blankets, and exciting perspiration, by all possible means--roasting them

before fires, &c. Like every other ingenious physician, he had something

pleasant, of his own contriving, to propose--_tum primum pensili

balinearum usu ad infinitum blandientem_--then first came up the

employment of hanging baths, to the infinite delight of the public. These

hanging baths, which Pliny says, lib. ix. 79, were really the invention of

Sergius Orata, were rather supported than suspended--fires were kindled

below--there were different _ahena_, or caldrons, the _caldarium_, and

_frigidarium_. The _corrivatio_ was simply the running together of the

cold and hot water. Annexed was the _laconicum_, or sweating room. The

curious reader may compare the Roman baths with those at Constantinople,

described by Miss Pardoe.

_Alia quoque blandimenta_, says Pliny, _excogitabat, jam suspendendo

lectulos, quorum jactatu aut morbos extenuaret, aut somnos alliceret_. He

excogitated other delights, such as suspended beds, whose motion soothed

the patient, or put him to sleep. The principle here seems pretty

universal, lying at the bottom of all those simple contrivances,

rocking-chairs, cribs, and cradles, swings, hammocks, &c. This is truly

Indian practice--

Rock-a-bye baby upon the tree top,

And, when the wind blows, the cradle will rock.

_Praeterea in quibusdam morbis medendi cruciatus detraxit, ut in anginis

quas curabant in fauces organo demisso. Damnavit merito et vomitiones,

tunc supra modum frequentes._ He also greatly diminished the severity of

former practice, in certain diseases, in quinsies for example, which they

used to cure, with an instrument, introduced into the fauces. He very

properly condemned those vomitings, then frequent, beyond all account.

This refers to the Roman usage, which is almost incomprehensible by us.

Celsus, De Med. lib. i. 3, refers to it, as the practice _eorum, qui

quotidie ejiciendo, vorandi facultatem moliuntur_--of those, who, by

vomiting daily, acquired the faculty of gormandizing. Suetonius says of

the imperial brute, Vitellius, sec. xiii. that he regularly dined, at

three places daily, _facile omnibus sufficiens, vomitandi

consuetudine_--easily enabled to do so, by his custom of vomiting.

Pliny's reflection, upon the success of the new doctor, is very

natural--_quae quum unusquisque semetipsum sibi praestare posse

intelligeret, faventibus cunctis, ut essent vera quae facillima erant,

universum prope humanum genus circumegit in se, non alio modo quam si

coelo emissus advenisset_. When every one saw, that he could apply the

rules for himself, all agreeing that things, which were so very simple,

must certainly be true, he gathered all mankind around him, precisely as

though he had been one, sent from Heaven.

In the following passage, Pliny employs the word, _artificium_, in an

oblique sense. _Trahebat praeterea mentes artifcio mirabili, vinum

promittendo aegris._ He attracted men's minds, by the remarkable _artifice_

of allowing wine to the sick.

During the temperance movement, some eminent physicians have asserted,

that wine was unnecessary, in every case--others have extended their

practice, and increased their popularity, by making their patients as

comfortable, as possible--_while they continued in the flesh_. A German,

who had been very intemperate, joined a total abstinence society, by the

advice of a temperance physician. In a little time the _tormina_ of his

stomach became unbearable. Instead of calling his temperance physician,

who would, probably, have eased the irritation, with a little wormwood, or

opium, he sent for the popular doctor, who told him, at once, that he

wanted brandy--"How much may I take?" inquired the German. "An ounce,

during the forenoon;" replied the doctor. After he had gone, the German

said to his son, "Harman, go, get de measure pook, and zee how mooch be

won ounz." The boy brought the book, and read aloud, eight drachms make

one ounce--the patient sprang half out of bed; and, rubbing his hands,

exclaimed--"dat ish de toctor vor me; I never took more nor voor trams in

a morning, in all my porn days--dat ish de trouble--I zee it now."

No. CXV.

Miss Bungs is dead. It is well to state this fact, lest I should be

suspected of some covert allusion to the living. She firmly believed in

the XXXIX. articles, and in a fortieth--namely--that man is a

fortune-hunter, from his cradle. She often declared, that, sooner than wed

a fortune-hunter, she would die a cruel death--she would die a maid--she

did so, in the full possession of her senses, to the last.

Her entire estate, consisting of sundry shares, in fancy stocks, two

parrots, a monkey, a silver snuff-box, and her paraphernalia, she directed

to be sold; and the avails employed, for the promotion of celibacy, among

the heathen.

Yet it was the opinion of those, who knew her intimately, that Miss Bungs

was, at heart, sufficiently disposed to enter into the holy state of

matrimony, could she have found one pure, disinterested spirit; but,

unfortunately, she was fully persuaded, that every man, who smiled upon

her, and inquired after her health, was "_after her money_." Miss Bungs

was not unwilling to encourage the impression, that she was an object of

particular regard, in certain quarters; and, if a gentleman picked up her

glove, or escorted her across a gutter, she was in the habit of

instituting particular inquiries, among her acquaintances--in strict

confidence of course--in regard to his moral character--ejaculating with a

sigh, that men were so mercenary now-a-days, it was difficult to know who

could be trusted.

Now, this was very wrong, in Miss Bungs. By the English law, if a man or a

woman pretends, falsely, that he or she is married to any person, that

person may libel, in the spiritual court, and obtain an injunction of

silence; and this offence, in the language of the law, is called

_jactitation of marriage_. I can see no reason why an injunction in cases

of _jactitation of courtship_, should not be allowed; for serious evils

may frequently arise, from such unauthorized pretences.

After grave reflection, I am of opinion, that Miss Bungs carried her

opposition to fortune-hunters, beyond the bounds of reason. Let us define

our terms. The party, who marries, only for money, intending, from the

very commencement, to make use of it, for the selfish gratification of

vain, or vicious, propensities--is a fortune-hunter of the very worst

kind. But let us not forget, as we go along, that this field is occupied

by huntresses, as well as by hunters; and that, upon such voyages of

discovery, the cap may be set, as effectually, as the compass.

There is another class, with whom the degree of personal attachment, which

really exists, is too feeble, to resist the combined influence of

selfishness and pride. Such also, I suppose, may be placed in the category

of fortune-hunters. We find an illustration of this, in the case of Mr.

Mewins. After a liberal arrangement had been made, for the young lady, by

her father; Mr. Mewins, having taken a particular fancy to a little, brown

mare, demanded, that it should be thrown into the bargain; and, upon a

positive refusal, the match was broken off. After a couple of years, the

parties accidentally met, at a country ball--Mr. Mewins was quite willing

to renew the engagement--the lady appeared not to have the slightest

recollection of him. "Surely you have not forgotten me," said he--"What

name, sir?" she inquired--"Mewins," he replied; "I had the honor of paying

my addresses to you, about two years ago."--"I remember a person of that

name," she rejoined, "who paid his addresses to my father's brown mare."

In matrimony, wealth is, of course, a very comforting accessory. It

renders an agreeable partner still more so--and it often goes, not a

little way, to balance an unequal bargain. Time and talent may as wisely

be wasted, in pursuit of the philosopher's stone, as of an unmixed good or

evil, on this side the grave. Temper may be mistaken, or it may change;

beauty may fade; but L60,000, well managed, will enable the _happy man or

woman_, to bear up, with tolerable complacency, under the severest trials

of domestic life. What a blessed thing it is, to fall back upon, when one

is compelled to mourn, over the infirmities of the living, or the absence,

of the dead! What a solace!

It was therefore wrong, in Miss Bungs, to designate, as fortune-hunters,

those, of either sex, who have come to the rational conclusion, that money

is essential to the happiness of married life. No man or woman of common

sense, who is poor, will, now-a-days, commit the indiscretion of _falling

in love_, unless with some person of ample possessions.

What, then, is to become of the penniless, and the unpretty! We must adopt

the custom of the ancient Babylonians, introduced about 1433 B. C., by

Atossa, the daughter of Belochus. At a certain season of the year, the

most lovely damsels were assembled, and put up, singly, at auction, to be

purchased, by the _highest_ bidder. The wealthy swains of Babylon poured

forth their wealth, like water; and rivals settled the question, not by

the length of their rapiers, but of their purses. The money, thus

obtained, became the dowry of those, whose personal attractions were not

likely to obtain them husbands. They also were put up, and sold to the

_lowest_ bidder, as the poor were formerly disposed of, in our villages.

Every unattractive maiden, young, old, and of no particular age, was put

up, at a _maximum_, and bestowed on him, who would take her, with the

smallest amount of dowry. It is quite possible, that certain lots may have

been withdrawn.

I rather prefer this practice to that of the Spartans, which prevailed,

about 884 B. C. At an appointed time, the marriageable damsels were

collected, in a hall, perfectly dark; and the young men were sent into the

apartment; walking, evidently, neither by faith nor by sight, but,

literally, feeling their way, and thus selected their helpmates. This is

in perfect keeping with the principle, that love is blind.

The ancient Greeks lived, and multiplied, without marriage. Eusebius, in

the preface to his Chronicon, states, that marriage ceremonies were first

introduced among them, by Cecrops, about 1554 B. C. The Athenians provided

by law, that no unmarried man should be entrusted with public affairs, and

the Lacedemomans passed severe laws against those, who unreasonably

deferred their marriage. It is not easy to reconcile the general policy of

promoting marriages, with the statute, 8 William III., 1695, by which they

were taxed; as they were again, in 1784.

The earliest celebration of marriages, in churches, was ordained by Pope

Innocent III., A. D. 1199. Marriages were forbidden in Lent, A. D. 364,

conforming, perhaps, to the rule of abstinence from flesh.

Fortune-hunting has not always been unaccompanied with violence. Stealing

an heiress was made felony, by 3 Henry VII. 1487, and benefit of clergy

denied, in such cases, by 39 Eliz. 1596. In the first year of George IV.

1820, this offence was made punishable by transportation. In the reign of

William III., Captain Campbell forcibly married Miss Wharton, an heiress.

The marriage was annulled, by act of Parliament, and Sir John Johnston was

hanged, for abetting. In 1827, two brothers and a sister, Edward, William,

and Frances Wakefield, were tried and convicted, for the felonious

abduction of Miss Turner, an heiress, whose marriage with Edward Wakefield

was annulled, by act of Parliament.

No species of fortune-hunter appears so entirely contemptible, as the

wretch, who marries for money, intending to employ it, not for the joint

comfort of the parties, but for the payment of his own arrearages; and who

resorts to the expedient of marriage, not to obtain a wife, but to avoid a

jail. And the exultation is pretty universal, when such a vagabond falls,

himself, into the snare, which he had so deliberately prepared, for

another.

In the fifth volume of the Diary of Samuel Pepys, pages 323, 329 and 330,

Lord Braybrooke has recorded three letters to Pepys, from an extraordinary

scoundrel of this description. The first letter from this man, Sir Samuel

Morland, who seems to have had some employment in the navy, bears date

"Saturday, 19 February, 1686-7." After communicating certain information,

respecting naval affairs, he proceeds, as follows:--

"I would have wayted on you with this account myself, but I presume you

have, ere this time, heard what an unfortunate and fatall accident has

lately befallen me, of which I shall give you an abreviat."

"About three weeks or a month since, being in very great perplexities, and

almost distracted for want of moneys, my private creditors tormenting me

from morning to night, and some of them threatening me with a prison, and

having no positive answer from his Majesty, about the L1300 which the late

Lord Treasurer cutt off from my pension so severely, which left a debt

upon me, which I was utterly unable to pay, there came a certain person to

me, whom I had relieved in a starving condition, and for whom I had done a

thousand kindnesses; who pretended, in gratitude to help me to a wife, who

was a very vertuous, pious, and sweet disposition'd lady, and an heiress,

who had L500 per ann. in land and inheritance, and L4000 in ready money,

with the interest since nine years, besides a mortgage upon L300 per ann.

more, with plate, jewels, &c. The devil himself could not contrive more

probable circumstances than were layd before me; and when I had often a

mind to enquire into the truth, I had no power, believing for certain

reasons, that there were certain charms or witchcraft used upon me; and,

withall, believing it utterly impossible that a person so obliged should

ever be guilty of so black a deed as to betray me in so barbarous a

manner. Besides that, I really believ'd it a blessing from Heaven for my

charity to that person: and I was, about a fortnight since, led as a fool

to the stocks, and married a coachman's daughter not worth a shilling, and

one who, about nine months since, was brought to bed of a bastard; and

thus I am both absolutely ruined, in my fortune and reputation, and must

become a derision to all the world."

"My case is at present in the Spiritual Court, and I presume, that one

word from his Majesty to his Proctor, and Advocate, and Judge, would

procure me speedy justice; if either our old acquaintance or Christian

pity move you, I beg you to put in a kind word for me, and to deliver the

enclosed into the King's own hands, with all convenient speed; for a

criminal bound and going to execution is not in greater agonies than has

been my poor, active soul since this befell me: and I earnestly beg you to

leave in three lines for me with your porter, what answer the King gives

you, and my man shall call for it. A flood of tears blind my eyes, and I

can write no more, but that I am your most humble and poor distressed

servant,

Dealings with the Dead, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 11 / 90 题