THE METHODS OF GENIUS.

(_BY OUR SPECIAL LITERARY PARASITE_.)

The public already know something of the painful difficulties under

which novelists labour at the present moment owing to the paper

shortage and the enhanced cost of book production. But "the economic

consequences of the Peace" by no means exhaust the handicaps of the

conscientious and sensitive novelist. We are glad therefore to note

the efforts of _The Daily Graphic_ to enlist the sympathy of the

public on behalf of this sorely tried and meritorious class. Our

contemporary tells us, for example, of one momentous writer who was

reduced to dictating blindfold "because the facial peculiarities of

first one and then another amanuensis" upset her equanimity. Then

there is the tragic story of Mr. R.L. HITCHENS, who, being engaged

to write an article against time, sent out for a stenographer, who on

arrival proved to be a man with a large black beard of so sinister

an aspect that Mr. HICHINS was forced to dismiss him and write the

article in his own hand. Yet Mr. HICHENSis not easily put off, for we

learn that he finds he works best in big hotels and not, as we might

have guessed, in the sequestered tranquillity of a minaret.

To some writers solitude is the true school of genius. Yet Sir

LEWIS MORRIS found some of his happiest thoughts come to him while

travelling in the underground, while Mr. W.B. YEATS records a similar

experience as the result of a journey on the top of a tram-car. Your

advanced modernists, with MARINETTI at their head, find their best

stimulus to creative effort in the clang and clatter of machinery.

_per contra_, to return to _The Daily Graphic_, Mrs. C.N. WILLIAMSON

must have pretty things to look at "in business hours." But the

happiest of all our authors is Madame ALBANESI, who "finds her

brain-spur in a blank sheet of paper, and not the ghost of an idea

what she is going to write about." Less fortunate writers labour

assiduously only to leave the minds of their readers a blank, without

the ghost of an idea of what the author has been writing about.

It is a pity that Mr. W.L. GEORGE, in his interesting survey of modern

writers of fiction in the _English Review_, has told us nothing

about the methods of the "Neo-Victorians" and "Semi-Victorians,"

the "Edwardians" and "belated Edwardians," and the "Georgians" and

"Neo-Georgians." With all these classes he deals faithfully. But his

criticism is purely literary. He fails to tell us the things that

every reader wants to know. It is all very well to say that the

neo-Georgians "paint in ink," but he ought to have mentioned whether

it is green or red. Does Miss DOROTHY RICHARDSON dictate to the sound

of trumpets, garbed in crimson trouserloons? Does Mr. ARNOLD BENNETT

cantillate his "copy" into the horn of a graphophone or use a

motor-stylus? Does Mr. SIEGRIED SASSOON beat his breast with one hand

while he plays the loud bassoon with the other? Does Mr. ALEC WAUGH

use sermon-paper or foolscap? Does Mr. ALDOUS HUXLEY keep a tame

gorilla? These are the really illuminating details that we hunger for.

Without them it is impossible to appreciate the artistry of our young

Masters. Mr. W.L. GEORGE has given us a glimpse of the working of

their brains; let him now reveal to us the secrets of their workshops.

* * * * *

[Illustration: "THERE'S THAT DASHED BULL OF YOURS IN MY FIELD AGAIN!

ONE OF THSES DAYS I'LL--I'LL--WRING ITS CONFOUNDED NECK!"

* * * * *

Punch or the London Charivari, Volume 158, March 24, 1920. · 第 32 / 35 题