Constantine, the emperor Heraclius' son, guarded that part of the

country where Amrou lay, with a considerable army. The weather was very

cold, and the Christians were quite disheartened, having been frequently

beaten and discouraged with the daily increasing power of the Saracens,

so that a great many grew weary of the service and withdrew from the

army. Constantine, having no hopes of victory, and fearing lest the

Saracens should seize Cæsarea, took the opportunity of a tempestuous

night to move off, and left his camp to the Saracens. Amrou, acquainting

Abu Obeidah with all that had happened, received express orders to march

directly to Cæsarea, where he promised to join him speedily, in order to

go against Tripoli, Acre, and Tyre. A short time after this, Tripoli was

surprised by the treachery of Youkinna, who succeeded in getting

possession of it on a sudden, and without any noise. Within a few days

of its capture there arrived in the harbor about fifty ships from Cyprus

and Crete, with provisions and arms which were to go to Constantine. The

officers, not knowing that Tripoli was fallen into the hands of new

masters, made no scruple of landing there, where they were courteously

received by Youkinna, who proffered the utmost of his service, and

promised to go along with them, but immediately seized both them and

their ships, and delivered the town into the hands of Kaled, who was

just come.

With these ships the traitor Youkinna sailed to Tyre, where he told the

inhabitants that he had brought arms and provisions for Constantine's

army; upon which he was kindly received, and, landing, he was liberally

entertained with nine hundred of his men. But being betrayed by one of

his own soldiers, he and his crew were seized and bound, receiving all

the while such treatment from the soldiers as their villanous practices

well deserved. In the mean time Yezid Ebn Abu Sofian, being detached by

Abu Obeidah from the camp before Cæsarea, came within sight of Tyre. The

governor upon this caused Youkinna and his men to be conveyed to the

castle, and there secured, and prepared for the defence of the town.

Perceiving that Yezid had with him but two thousand men in all, he

resolved to make a sally. In the mean time the rest of the inhabitants

ran up to the walls to see the engagement. While they were fighting,

Youkinna and his men were set at liberty by one Basil, of whom they give

the following account, viz.: That this Basil going one day to pay a

visit to Bahira the monk, the caravan of the Koreishites came by, with

which were Kadija's camels, under the care of Mahomet. As he looked

toward the caravan, he beheld Mahomet in the middle of it, and above him

there was a cloud to keep him from the sun. Then the caravan having

halted, as Mahomet leaned against an old, withered tree, it immediately

brought forth leaves. Bahira, perceiving this, made an entertainment for

the caravan, and invited them into the monastery. They all went, leaving

Mahomet behind with the camels. Bahira, missing him, asked if they were

all present. "Yes," they said, "all but a little boy we have left to

look after their things and feed the camels." "What is his name?" says

Bahira. They told him, "Mahomet Ebn Abdallah." Bahira asked if his

father and mother were not both dead, and if he was not brought up by

his grandfather and his uncle. Being informed that it was so, he said:

"O Koreish! Set a high value upon him, for he is your lord, and by him

will your power be great both in this world and that to come; for he is

your ornament and glory." When they asked him how he knew that, Bahira

answered, "Because as you were coming, there was never a tree nor stone

nor clod but bowed itself and worshipped God." Moreover, Bahira told

this Basil that a great many prophets had leaned against this tree and

sat under it since it was first withered, but that it never bore any

leaves before. And I heard him say, says this same Basil: "This is the

prophet concerning whom Isa (Jesus) spake. Happy is he that believes in

him and follows him and gives credit to his mission." This Basil, after

the visit to Bahira, had gone to Constantinople and other parts of the

Greek Emperor's territories, and upon information of the great success

of the followers of this prophet was abundantly convinced of the truth

of his mission. This inclined him, having so fair an opportunity

offered, to release Youkinna and his men; who, sending word to the

ships, the rest of their forces landed and joined them. In the mean time

a messenger in disguise was sent to acquaint Yezid with what was done.

As soon as he returned, Youkinna was for falling upon the townsmen upon

the wall; but Basil said, "Perhaps God might lead some of them into the

right way," and persuaded him to place the men so as to prevent their

coming down from the wall. This done, they cried out, "La Ilaha," etc.

The people, perceiving themselves betrayed and the prisoners at liberty,

were in the utmost confusion, none of them being able to stir a step or

lift up a hand. The Saracens in the camp, hearing the noise in the city,

knew what it meant, and, marching up, Youkinna opened the gates and let

them in. Those that were in the city fled, some one way and some

another, and were pursued by the Saracens and put to the sword. Those

upon the wall cried, "Quarter!" but Yezid told them that since they had

not surrendered, but the city was taken by force, they were all slaves.

"However," said he, "we of our own accord set you free, upon condition

you pay tribute; and if any of you has a mind to change his religion, he

shall fare as well as we do." The greatest part of them turned

Mahometans. When Constantine heard of the loss of Tripoli and Tyre his

heart failed him, and taking shipping with his family and the greater

part of his wealth he departed for Constantinople. All this while Amrou

ben-el-Ass lay before Cæsarea. In the morning when the people came to

inquire after Constantine, and could hear no tidings of him nor his

family, they consulted together, and with one consent surrendered the

city to Amrou, paying down for their security two thousand pieces of

silver, and delivering into his hands all that Constantine had been

obliged to leave behind him of his property. Thus was Cæsarea lost in

the year of our Lord 638, being the seventeenth year of the Hegira and

the fifth of Omar's reign, which answers to the twenty-ninth year of the

emperor Heraclius. After the taking of Cæsarea all the other places in

Syria which as yet held out, namely, Ramlah, Acre, Joppa, Ascalon, Gaza,

Sichem (or Nablos), and Tiberias, surrendered, and in a little time

after the people of Beiro Zidon, Jabalah, and Laodicea followed their

example; so that there remained nothing more for the Saracens to do in

Syria, who, in little more than six years from the time of their first

expedition in Abu-Beker's reign, had succeeded in subduing the whole of

that large, wealthy, and populous country.

Syria did not remain long in the possession of those persons who had the

chief hand in subduing it, for in the eighteenth year of the Hegira the

mortality in Syria, both among men and beasts, was so terrible,

particularly at Emaus and the adjacent territory, that the Arabs called

that year the year of destruction. By that pestilence the Saracens lost

five-and-twenty thousand men, among whom were Abu Obeidah, who was then

fifty-eight years old; Serjabil Ebn Hasanah, formerly Mahomet's

secretary; and Yezid Ebn Abu Sofian, with several other officers of

note. Kaled survived them about three years, and then died; but the

place of his burial--consequently of his death, for they did not use in

those days to carry them far--is uncertain; some say at Hems, others at

Medina.

FOOTNOTES:

[66] Those of Medina are called by that name because they helped Mahomet

in his flight from Mecca.

[67] Those that fled with him are called Mohajerins; by these names the

inhabitants of Mecca and Medina are often distinguished.

SARACENS CONQUER EGYPT

DESTRUCTION OF THE LIBRARY AT ALEXANDRIA

A.D. 640

WASHINGTON IRVING

Who shall estimate the loss to civilization and the world that has

been caused by the destruction of accumulated stores of books,

through the crass ignorance or stupid bigotry of benighted rulers?

The chronicles record a number of such vandal acts. Hwangti, one of

China's greatest monarchs, he who built the Great Wall of China,

attempted the complete extinction of literature in that country,

B.C. 213. That prince, being at one time strongly opposed by

certain men of letters, expressed his hatred and contempt, not only

of the literary class, but of literature itself, and resorted to

extreme measures of coercion. All books were proscribed, and orders

issued to burn every work except those relating to medicine,

agriculture, and science. The destruction was carried out with

terrible completeness. The burning of the books was accompanied by

the execution of five hundred of the _literati_ and by the

banishment of many thousands.

The destruction of the Alexandrian Library, by command of Omar, was

as complete as the extinction of literature in China by Hwangti, as

head of the Moslem religion.

Omar, using the intrepid Amru, was vicariously proselyting in true

Mahometan style--in one hand offering the _Koran_, the while the

other extended the sword.

After a successful campaign in Palestine, Omar's victorious banners

were planted in the historic soil of the Pharaohs. A protracted

siege of seven months found Amru master of the royal city of

Alexandria. The library there was famed as the greatest magazine of

literature. But this availed nothing with the ruthless Omar, for he

doomed it to annihilation.

Prof. Thomas Smith says: "The library had been collected at

fabulous expense of labor and money, from all countries of the

world. Its destruction was a wanton act; but its perpetrator

showed, like the loving spouse 'of another noted personage, that

'though on pleasure he was bent, he had a frugal mind.' He did not

consume the books on their shelves, or in whatever repositories

contained them, although doubtless they would have made a beautiful

blaze. He utilized them as fuel for heating the baths of the city;

and we are told that they sufficed to heat the water for four

thousand such baths for six months. With an average share of

persuasibility, when it is not against our will to be convinced, we

stagger at the statement that seven hundred and thirty thousand

furnaces could have been supplied with fuel from the contents of

even that magnificent palace, and therefore venture to suggest that

the papyri and palm-leaf manuscripts were used rather as

fire-lighters than as fuel. Even this is a rather large order; but

undoubtedly the collection was enormous. The reason tradition

ascribes to Omar for this act has never, so far as we know, been

disputed till quite recently, when 'historical criticism' has taken

it in hand. 'The contents of these books are either in accordance

with the teaching of the _Koran_ or they are opposed to it. If in

accord, then they are useless, since the _Koran_ itself is

sufficient; and if in opposition, they are pernicious and must be

destroyed.'

"But the piecemeal destruction of many hundreds of thousands of

manuscripts was no trifling task, even for a despotic caliph. A few

escaped their doom; how, we do not know. Perhaps some officer

annexed for himself some manuscript that struck him as specially

beautiful; or perhaps some stoker at some bath rejected one as slow

of ignition. At all events a few--probably very few--were

preserved, and among them must have been copies of the writings of

Euclid and Ptolemy, the _Elements_ of the one, the _Almagest_ of

the other."

A proof of the religious infatuation, or the blind confidence in

destiny, which hurried the Moslem commanders of those days into the most

extravagant enterprises, is furnished in the invasion of the once proud

empire of the Pharaohs, the mighty, the mysterious Egypt, with an army

of merely five thousand men. The caliph Omar himself, though he had

suggested this expedition, seems to have been conscious of its rashness,

or rather to have been chilled by the doubts of his prime counsellor

Othman; for, while Amru was on the march, he despatched missives after

him to the following effect: "If this epistle reach thee before thou

hast crossed the boundary of Egypt, come instantly back; but if it find

thee within the Egyptian territory, march on with the blessing of Allah,

and be assured I will send thee all necessary aid."

The bearer of the letter overtook Amru while yet within the bounds of

Syria; that wary general either had secret information or made a shrewd

surmise as to the purport of his errand, and continued his march across

the border without admitting him to an audience. Having encamped at the

Egyptian village of Arish, he received the courier with all due respect,

and read the letter aloud in the presence of his officers. When he had

finished, he demanded of those about him whether they were in Syria or

Egypt. "In Egypt," was the reply. "Then," said Amru, "we will proceed,

with the blessing of Allah, and fulfil the commands of the Caliph."

The first place to which he laid siege was Farwak, or Pelusium, situated

on the shores of the Mediterranean, on the isthmus which separates that

sea from the Arabian Gulf, and connects Egypt with Syria and Arabia. It

was therefore considered the key to Egypt. A month's siege put Amru in

possession of the place; he then examined the surrounding country with

more forethought than was generally manifested by the Moslem conquerors,

and projected a canal across the isthmus, to connect the waters of the

Red Sea and the Mediterranean. His plan, however, was condemned by the

Caliph as calculated to throw open Arabia to a maritime invasion of the

Christians.

Amru now proceeded to Misrah, the Memphis of the ancients, and residence

of the early Egyptian kings. This city was at that time the strongest

fortress in Egypt, except Alexandria, and still retained much of its

ancient magnificence. It stood on the western bank of the Nile, above

the Delta, and a little east of the pyramids. The citadel was of great

strength and well garrisoned, and had recently been surrounded with a

deep ditch, into which nails and spikes had been thrown, to impede

assailants.

The Arab armies, rarely provided with the engines necessary for the

attack of fortified places, generally beleaguered them, cut off all

supplies, attacked all foraging parties that sallied forth, and thus

destroyed the garrison in detail or starved it to a surrender. This was

the reason of the long duration of their sieges. This of Misrah, or

Memphis, lasted seven months, in the course of which the little army of

Amru was much reduced by frequent skirmishings. At the end of this time

he received a reinforcement of four thousand men, sent to him at his

urgent entreaties by the Caliph. Still his force would have been

insufficient for the capture of the place had he not been aided by the

treachery of its governor, Mokawkas.

This man, an original Egyptian, or Copt, by birth, and of noble rank,

was a profound hypocrite. Like most of the Copts, he was of the Jacobite

sect, who denied the double nature of Christ. He had dissembled his

sectarian creed, however, and deceived the emperor Heraclius by a show

of loyalty, so as to be made prefect of his native province and governor

of the city. Most of the inhabitants of Memphis were Copts and Jacobite

Christians, and held their Greek fellow-citizens, who were of the

regular Catholic Church of Constantinople, in great antipathy.

Mokawkas, in the course of his administration, had collected, by taxes

and tribute, an immense amount of treasure, which he had deposited in

the citadel. He saw that the power of the Emperor was coming to an end

in this quarter, and thought the present a good opportunity to provide

for his own fortune. Carrying on a secret correspondence with the Moslem

general, he agreed to betray the place into his hands on condition of

receiving the treasure as a reward for his treason. He accordingly, at

an appointed time, removed the greater part of the garrison from the

citadel to an island in the Nile. The fortress was immediately assailed

by Amru, at the head of his fresh troops, and was easily carried by

assault, the Copts rendering no assistance.

The Greek soldiery, on the Moslem standard being hoisted on the citadel,

saw through the treachery, and, giving up all as lost, escaped in their

ships to the mainland; upon which the prefect surrendered the place by

capitulation. An annual tribute of two ducats a head was levied on all

the inhabitants of the district, with the exception of old men, women,

and boys under the age of sixteen years. It was further conditioned that

the Moslem army should be furnished with provisions, for which they

would pay, and that the inhabitants of the country should forthwith

build bridges over all the streams on the way to Alexandria. It was also

agreed that every Mussulman travelling through the country should be

entitled to three days' hospitality, free of charge.

The traitor Mokawkas was put in possession of his ill-gotten wealth. He

begged of Amru to be taxed with the Copts and always to be enrolled

among them, declaring his abhorrence of the Greeks and their doctrines;

urging Amru to persecute them with unremitting violence. He extended

his sectarian bigotry even into the grave, stipulating that at his death

he should be buried in the Christian Jacobite church of St. John at

Alexandria.

Amru, who was politic as well as brave, seeing the irreconcilable hatred

of the Coptic or Jacobite Christians to the Greeks, showed some favor to

that sect, in order to make use of them in his conquest of the country.

He even prevailed upon their patriarch Benjamin to emerge from his

desert and hold a conference with him, and subsequently declared that

"he had never conversed with a Christian priest of more innocent manners

or venerable aspect." This piece of diplomacy had its effect, for we are

told that all the Copts above and below Memphis swore allegiance to the

Caliph.

Amru now pressed on for the city of Alexandria, distant about one

hundred and twenty-five miles. According to stipulation, the people of

the country repaired the roads and erected bridges to facilitate his

march; the Greeks, however, driven from various quarters by the progress

of their invaders, had collected at different posts on the island of the

Delta and the channels of the Nile, and disputed with desperate but

fruitless obstinacy the onward course of the conquerors. The severest

check was given at Keram al Shoraik, by the late garrison of Memphis,

who had fortified themselves there after retreating from the island of

the Nile. For three days did they maintain a gallant conflict with the

Moslems, and then retired in good order to Alexandria. With all the

facilities furnished to them on their march, it cost the Moslems

two-and-twenty days to fight their way to that great city.

Alexandria now lay before them, the metropolis of wealthy Egypt, the

emporium of the East, a place strongly fortified, stored with all the

munitions of war, open by sea to all kinds of supplies and

reinforcements, and garrisoned by Greeks, aggregated from various

quarters, who here were to make the last stand for their Egyptian

empire. It would seem that nothing short of an enthusiasm bordering on

madness could have led Amru and his host on an enterprise against this

powerful city.

The Moslem leader, on planting his standard before the place, summoned

it to surrender on the usual terms, which being promptly refused, he

prepared for a vigorous siege. The garrison did not wait to be attacked,

but made repeated sallies and fought with desperate valor. Those who

gave greatest annoyance to the Moslems were their old enemies, the Greek

troops from Memphis. Amru, seeing that the greatest defence was from a

main tower, or citadel, made a gallant assault upon it and carried it,

sword in hand. The Greek troops, however, rallied to that point from all

parts of the city; the Moslems, after a furious struggle, gave way, and

Amru, his faithful slave Werdan, and one of his generals, named Moslema

Ibn al Mokalled, fighting to the last, were surrounded, overpowered, and

taken prisoners.

The Greeks, unaware of the importance of their captives, led them before

the governor. He demanded of them, haughtily, what was their object in

thus overrunning the world and disturbing the quiet of peaceable

neighbors. Amru made the usual reply that they came to spread the faith

of Islam; and that it was their intention, before they laid by the

sword, to make the Egyptians either converts or tributaries. The

boldness of his answer and the loftiness of his demeanor awakened the

suspicions of the governor, who, supposing him to be a warrior of note

among the Arabs, ordered one of his guards to strike off his head. Upon

this Werdan, the slave, understanding the Greek language, seized his

master by the collar, and, giving him a buffet on the cheek, called him

an impudent dog, and ordered him to hold his peace, and let his

superiors speak. Moslema, perceiving the meaning of the slave, now

interposed, and made a plausible speech to the governor, telling him

that Amru had thoughts of raising the siege, having received a letter to

that effect from the Caliph, who intended to send ambassadors to treat

for peace, and assuring the governor that, if permitted to depart, they

would make a favorable report to Amru.

The governor, who, if Arabian chronicles may be believed on this point,

must have been a man of easy faith, ordered the prisoners to be set at

liberty; but the shouts of the besieging army on the safe return of

their general soon showed him how completely he had been duped.

But scanty details of the siege of Alexandria have reached the

Christian reader, yet it was one of the longest, most obstinately

contested, and sanguinary in the whole course of the Moslem wars. It

endured fourteen months with various success; the Moslem army was

repeatedly reinforced and lost twenty-three thousand men. At length

their irresistible ardor and perseverance prevailed; the capital of

Egypt was conquered and the Greek inhabitants were dispersed in all

directions. Some retreated in considerable bodies into the interior of

the country, and fortified themselves in strongholds; others took refuge

in the ships and put to sea.

Amru, on taking possession of the city, found it nearly abandoned; he

prohibited his troops from plundering, and, leaving a small garrison to

guard the place, hastened with his main army in pursuit of the fugitive

Greeks. In the mean time the ships, which had taken off a part of the

garrison, were still lingering on the coast, and tidings reached them

that the Moslem general had departed and had left the captured city

nearly defenceless. They immediately made sail back for Alexandria, and

entered the port in the night. The Greek soldiers surprised the

sentinels, got possession of the city, and put most of the Moslems they

found there to the sword.

Amru was in full pursuit of the Greek fugitives when he heard of the

recapture of the city. Mortified at his own negligence in leaving so

rich a conquest with so slight a guard, he returned in all haste,

resolved to retake it by storm. The Greeks, however, had fortified

themselves strongly in the castle and made stout resistance. Amru was

obliged, therefore, to besiege it a second time, but the siege was

short. The castle was carried by assault; many of the Greeks were cut to

pieces, the rest escaped once more to their ships and now gave up the

capital as lost. All this occurred in the nineteenth year of the Hegira,

and the year 640 of the Christian era.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 04 · 第 27 / 38 段