This also explains what is often set down as the inexplicable want of

patriotism shown by the native Irish in not combining more resolutely

together against their assailants. It is true that they did not do so,

but the fact is not referred to the right cause. An Englishman of the

time of the Heptarchy had, if at all, little more patriotism, and hardly

more sense of common country. He was a Wessex man, or a Northumbrian, or

a man of the North or the East Angles, rather than an Englishman. So too

in Ireland. As a people the Irish of that day can hardly be said to have

had any corporate existence. They were O'Briens, or O'Neils, or

O'Connors, or O'Flaherties, and that no doubt in their own eyes appeared

to be quite nationality enough.

Unfortunately both for the country and for his own successors, Henry had

no time to carry out his plans, and all that he had begun to organize

fell away into disorder again after his departure. "That inconstant

sea-nymph," says Sir John Davis, "whom the Pope had wedded to him with a

ring," remained obedient only as long as her new lord was present, and

once his back was turned she reverted to her own ways again. The crowd

of Norman and Welsh adventurers who now filled the country were each and

all intent upon ascertaining how much of that country they could seize

upon and appropriate for themselves. There were many gallant men amongst

them, but there was not one apparently who had the faintest trace of

what is meant by public spirit. Occupied only by their own interests,

and struggling solely for their own share of the spoil, they could never

really hold the country, and even those parts which they did get into

their hands lapsed back after a while into the old condition again.

The result was that the fighting never ended. The new colonists built

castles and lived shut up in them, ruling their own immediate retainers

with an odd mixture of Brehon and Norman law. When they issued forth

they appeared clad from head to foot in steel, ravaging the country more

like foreign mercenaries than peaceful settlers. The natives, driven to

bay and dispossessed of their lands, fought too, not in armour, but,

like the Berserkers of old, in their shirts, with the addition at most

of a rude leather helmet, more often only with their hair matted into a

sort of cap on their foreheads in the fashion known as the "gibbe," that

"rascally gibbe" to which Spenser and other Elizabethan writers object

so strongly. By way of defence they now and then threw up a rude

stockade of earth or stone, modifications of the primitive rath, more

often they made no defence, or merely twisted a jungle of boughs along

the pathways to break the advance of their more heavily armed foes. The

ideas of the two races were as dissimilar as their weapons. The instinct

of the one was to conquer a country and subdue it to their own uses; the

instinct of the other was to trust to the country itself, and depend

upon its natural features, its forests, morasses, and so forth for

security. The one was irresistible in attack, the other, as his

conqueror soon learnt to his cost, practically invincible in defence,

returning doggedly again and again, and a hundred times over to the

ground from which he seemed at first to have been so easily and so

effectually driven off.

All these peculiarities, which for ages continued to mark the struggle

between the two races now brought face to face in a death struggle, are

just as marked and just as strikingly conspicuous in the first twenty

years which followed the invasion as they are during the succeeding

half-dozen centuries.

[Illustration: FIGURES ON KILCARN FONT, MEATH.]

XIII.

JOHN IN IRELAND.

Henry had gone, and the best hopes of the new dependency departed with

him never to return again. Fourteen years later he despatched his son

John, then a youth of nineteen, with a train of courtiers, and amongst

them our friend Giraldus, who appeared to have been sent over in some

sort of tutorial or secretarial capacity.

The expedition was a disastrous failure. The chiefs flocked to Waterford

to do honour to their king's son. The courtiers, encouraged by their

insolent young master, scoffed at the dress, and mockingly plucked the

long beards of the tributaries. Furious and smarting under the insult

they withdrew, hostile every man of them now to the death. The news

spread; the more distant and important of the chieftains declined to

appear. John and his courtiers gave themselves up to rioting and

misconduct of various kinds. All hopes of conciliation were at an end. A

successful confederation was formed amongst the Irish, and the English

were for a while driven bodily out of Munster. John returned to England

at the end of eight months, recalled in hot haste and high displeasure

by his father.

Twenty-five years later he came back again, this time as king, with a

motley army of mercenaries gathered to crush the two brothers De Lacy,

who for the moment dominated all Ireland--the one, Hugo, being Earl of

Ulster, and Viceroy; the other, Walter, Lord of the Palatinate of Meath.

Among his many vices John had not at least that of indolence to be laid

to his charge! He marched direct from Waterford to Trim, the

head-quarters of the De Lacys, seized the castle, moved on next day to

Kells, thence proceeded by rapid stages to Dundalk, Carlingford,

Downpatrick, and Carrickfergus. Hugo de Lacy fled in dismay to Scotland.

The chieftains of Connaught and Thomond joined their forces with those

of the king; even the hitherto indomitable O'Neil made a proffer of

submission. Leaving a garrison at Carrickfergus, John marched back by

Downpatrick and Drogheda, re entered Meath, visited Duleck, slept a

night at Kells, and so back to Dublin, where he was met by nearly every

Anglo-Norman baron, each and all eager to exhibit their own loyalty. His

next care was to divide their territory into counties; to bind them over

to supply soldiers when called upon to do so by the viceroy, and to

arrange for the muster of troops in Dublin. Then away he went again to

England. He had been in the country exactly sixty-six days.

Unpleasant man and detestable king as he was, John had no slight share

of the governing powers of his race, and even his short stay in Ireland

did some good, enough to show what might have been done had a better

man, and one in a little less desperate hurry, remained to hold the

reins. He had proved that, however they might ape the part, the barons

were not as a matter of fact the absolute lords of Ireland; that they

had a master beyond the sea; one who, if aroused, could make the boldest

of them shake in his coat of mail. The lesson was not as well learnt as

it ought to have been, but it was better at least than if it had not

been learnt at all.

At that age and in its then condition a strong ruler--native if

possible, if not, foreign--was by far the best hope for Ireland. Such a

ruler, if only for his own sake, would have had the genuine interests of

the country at heart. He might have tyrannized himself, but the little

tyrants would have been kept at bay. Few countries--and certainly

Ireland was not one of the exceptions--were at that time ripe for what

we now mean by free institutions. Freedom meant the freedom of a strong

government, one that was not at the beck of accident, and was not

perpetually changing from one hand to another. The English people found

this out for themselves centuries later during the terrible anarchy

which resulted from the Wars of the Roses, and of their own accord put

themselves under the brutal, but on the whole patriotic, yoke of the

Tudors. In Ireland the petty masters unfortunately were always near; the

great one was beyond the sea and not so easily to be got at! There was

no unity; no pretence of even-handed justice, no one to step between the

oppressed and the oppressor. And the result of all this is still to be

seen written as in letters of brass upon the face of the country and

woven into the very texture of the character of its people.

XIV.

THE LORDS PALATINE.

The jealousy shown by Henry and his sons towards the earliest invaders

of Ireland is doubtless the reason why Giraldus--for a courtier and an

ecclesiastic upon his promotion--is so remarkably explicit upon their

royal failings. The Geraldines especially seem to have been the objects

of this not very unnatural jealousy, and the Geraldines are, on the

other hand, to Giraldus himself, objects of an almost superstitious

worship. His pen never wearies of expatiating upon their valour, fame,

beauty, and innumerable graces, laying stress especially--and in this he

is certainly borne out by the facts--upon the great advantage which men

trained in the Welsh wars, and used all their lives to skirmishing in

the lightest order, had over those who had had no previous experience of

the very peculiar warfare necessary in Ireland. "Who," he cries with a

burst of enthusiasm, "first penetrated into the heart of the enemy's

country? The Geraldines! Who have kept it in submission? The Geraldines!

Who struck most terror into the enemy? The Geraldines! Against whom are

the shafts of malice chiefly directed? The Geraldines! Oh that they had

found a prince who could have appreciated their distinguished worth! How

tranquil, how peaceful would then have been the state of Ireland under

their administration!"

Even their indignant chronicler admits however that the Geraldines did

not do so very badly for themselves! Maurice Fitzgerald, the eldest of

the brothers, became the ancestor both of the Earls of Kildare and

Desmond; William, the younger, obtained an immense grant of land in

Kerry from the McCarthys, indeed as time went on the lordship of the

Desmond Fitzgeralds grew larger and larger, until it covered nearly as

much ground as many a small European kingdom. Nor was this all. The

White Knight, the Knight of Glyn, and the Knight of Kerry were all three

Fitzgeralds, all descended from the same root, and all owned large

tracts of country. The position of the Geraldines of Kildare was even

more important, on account of their close proximity to Dublin. In later

times their great keep at Maynooth dominated the whole Pale, while their

followers swarmed everywhere, each man with a G. embroidered upon his

breast in token of his allegiance. By the beginning of the sixteenth

century their power had reached to, perhaps, the highest point ever

attained in these islands by any subject. Whoever might be called the

Viceroy in Ireland it was the Earl of Kildare who practically governed

the country.

Originally there were three Palatinates--Leinster granted to Strongbow,

Meath to De Lacy, and Ulster to De Courcy. To these two more were

afterwards added, namely, Ormond and Desmond. The power of the Lord

Palatine was all but absolute. He had his own Palatinate court, with its

judges, sheriffs, and coroners. He could build fortified towns, and

endow them with charters. He could create as many knights as he thought

fit, a privilege of which they seem fully to have availed themselves,

since we learn that Richard, Earl of Ulster, created no less than

thirty-three upon a single occasion. For all practical purposes the

Palatinates were thus simply petty kingdoms or principalities,

independent in everything but the name.

Strongbow, the greatest of all the territorial barons, left no son to

inherit his estates, only a daughter, who married William Marshall, Earl

of Pembroke. Through her his estates passed to five heiresses, who

married five great nobles, namely, Warrenne, Mountchesny, De Vesci, De

Braosa, and Gloucester. Strongbow's Palatinate of Leinster was thus

split up into five smaller Palatinates. As none of the new owners

moreover chose to live in Ireland, and their revenues were merely drawn

away to England, the estates were after awhile very properly declared

forfeited, and went to the Crown. Thus the one who of all the

adventurers had cherished the largest and most ambitious hopes in the

end left no enduring mark at all in Ireland.

Connaught--despite a treaty drawn up between Henry I. and Cathal

O'Connor, its native king--was granted by John to William FitzAldelm de

Burgh and his son Richard, on much the same terms as Ulster had been

already granted to De Courcy, on the understanding, that is to say, that

if he could he might win it by the sword. De Courcy failed, but the De

Burghs were wilier and more successful. Carefully fostering a strife

which shortly after broke out between the two rival princes of the house

of O'Connor, and watching from the fortress they had built for

themselves at Athlone, upon the Shannon, they seized an opportunity when

both combatants were exhausted to pounce upon the country, and wrest the

greater part of it away from their grasp. They also drove away the clan

of O'Flaherty--owners from time immemorial of the region known as Moy

Seola, to the east of the bay of Galway--and forced them back across

Lough Corrib, where they took refuge amongst the mountains of far

Connaught, descending continually in later times in fierce hordes, and

wreaking their vengeance upon the town of Galway, which had been founded

by the De Burghs at the mouth of the river which carries the waters of

Lough Corrib to the sea. To this day the whole of this region of Moy

Seola and the eastern shores of Lough Corrib may be seen to be thickly

peppered over with ruined De Burgh castles, monuments of some four or

five centuries of uninterrupted fighting.

At one time the De Burghs were by far the largest landowners in Ireland.

Not only did they possess an immense tract of Connaught, but by the

marriage of Richard de Burgh's son to Maud, daughter of Hugh de Lacy,

Earl of Ulster, they became the nominal owners of nearly all Ulster to

boot. It never was more, however, than a nominal ownership, the clutch

of the O'Neills and O'Donnells being found practically impossible to

unloose, so that all the De Burghs could be said to hold were the

southern borders of what are now the counties of Down, Monaghan, and

Antrim. When, too, William, the third Earl of Ulster, was murdered in

1333, his possessions passed to his daughter and heiress, a child of two

years old. A baby girl's inheritance was not likely, as may be imagined,

to be regarded at that date as particularly sacred. Ulster was at once

retaken by the O'Neills and O'Connels. Two of the Burkes, or De Burghs,

Ulick and Edmund, seized Connaught and divided it between them, becoming

in due time the ancestors, the one of the Mayos, the other of the

Clanricardes.

Another of the great houses was that of the Ormonds, descended from

Theobald Walter, a nephew of Thomas à Becket, who was created hereditary

cup-bearer or butler to Henry II. Theobald Walter received grants of

land in Tipperary and Kilkenny, as well as at Arklow, and in 1391

Kilkenny Castle was sold to his descendant the Earl of Ormond by the

heirs of Strongbow. The Ormonds' most marked characteristic is that from

the beginning to the end of their career they remained, with hardly an

exception, loyal adherents of the English Crown. Their most important

representative was the "great duke" as he was called, James, Duke of

Ormond, who bore an important part in the civil wars of Charles I., and

is perhaps the most distinguished representative of all these great

Norman Irish houses, unless indeed one of the greatest names in the

whole range of English political history--that of Edmund Burke--is to be

added to the list, as perhaps in fairness it ought.

Troublesome as it is to keep these different houses in the memory, it is

hopeless to attempt without doing so to understand anything of the

history of Ireland. In England where the ruling power was vested first

in the sovereign and later in the Parliament, the landowners, however

large their possessions, rarely attained to more than a local

importance, save of course when one of them chanced to rise to eminence

as a soldier or a statesman. In Ireland the parliament, throughout

nearly the whole of its separate existence, was little more than a name,

irregularly summoned, and until the middle of the sixteenth century,

representing only one small corner of the country. The kings never came;

the viceroys came and went in a continually changing succession;

practically, therefore, the great territorial barons constituted the

backbone of the country--so far as it could be said to have had any

backbone at all. They made war with the native chiefs, or else made

alliances with them and married their daughters. They raided one

another's properties, slew one another's kerns, and carried one another

away prisoner. Sometimes their independent action went even further than

this. The battle of Knocktow, of which we shall hear in due time, arose

because the Earl of Kildare's daughter had quarrelled with her husband,

the Earl of Clanricarde, and her father chose to espouse her quarrel.

Two large armies were collected, nearly all the lords of the Pale and

their followers being upon one side, under the banner of Kildare, a vast

and undisciplined horde of natives under Clanricarde upon the other, and

the slaughter is said to have exceeded 8,000. Parental affection is a

very attractive quality, but when it swells to such dimensions as these

it becomes formidable for the peace of a country!

XV.

EDWARD BRUCE IN IRELAND.

One of the greatest difficulties to be faced in the study of Irish

history, no matter upon what scale, is to discover any reasonable method

of dividing our space. The habit of distributing all historical affairs

into reigns is often misleading enough even in England; in Ireland it

becomes simply ridiculous. What difference can any one suppose it made

to the great bulk of the people of that country whether a Henry, whom

they had never seen, had been succeeded by an Edward they had never

seen, or an Edward by a Henry? No two sovereigns could have been less

alike in character or aims than Henry III. and Edward I., yet when we

fix our eyes upon Ireland the difference is to all intents and purposes

imperceptible.

That, though he never visited the country, Edward I., like his

great-grandfather, had large schemes for the benefit of Ireland is

certain. Practically, however? his schemes never came to anything, and

the chief effect of his reign was that the country was so largely drawn

upon for men and money for the support of his wars elsewhere as greatly

to weaken the already feeble power of the Government, the result being

that at the first touch of serious trouble it all but fell to pieces.

Very serious trouble indeed came in the reign of the second Edward. The

battle of Bannockburn--the greatest disaster which ever befel the

English during their Scotch wars--had almost as marked an effect on

Ireland as on Scotland. All the elements of disaffection at once began

to boil and bubble. The O'Neills--ever ready for a fray, and the nearest

in point of distance to Scotland--promptly made overtures to the Bruces,

and Edward Bruce, the victorious king's brother, was despatched at the

head of a large army, and landing in 1315 near Carrickfergus was at once

joined by the O'Neills, and war proclaimed.

The first to confront these new allies was Richard de Burgh, the "Red

Earl" of Ulster, who was twice defeated by them and driven back on

Dublin. The viceroy, Sir Edmund Butler, was the next encountered, and he

also was defeated at a battle near Ardscul, whereupon the whole country

rose like one man. Fedlim O'Connor, the young king of Connaught, the

hereditary chieftain of Thomond, and a host of smaller chieftains of

Connaught, Munster, and Meath, flew to arms. Even the De Lacys and

several of the other Norman colonists threw in their lot with the

invaders. Edward Bruce gained another victory at Kells, and having

wasted the country round about, destroying the property of the colonists

and slaughtering all whom he could find, he returned to Carrickfergus,

where he was met by his brother, King Robert, and together they crossed

Ireland, descending as far south as Cashel, and burning, pillaging, and

destroying wherever they went. In 1316 the younger Bruce was crowned

king at Dundalk.

Such was the panic they created, and so utterly disunited were the

colonists, that for a time they carried all before them. It is plain

that Edward Bruce--who on one side was descended both from Strongbow and

Dermot McMurrough--fully hoped to have cut out a kingdom for himself

with his sword, as others of his blood had hoped and intended before

him. His own excesses, however, went far to prevent that. So frightfully

did he devastate the country, and so horrible was the famine which he

created, that many even of his own army perished from it or from the

pestilence which followed. His Irish allies fell away in dismay. English

and Irish annalists, unanimous for once, alike exclaim in horror over

his deeds. Clyn, the Franciscan historian, tells us how he burned and

plundered the churches. The annals of Lough Cè say that "no such period

for famine or destruction of men" ever occurred, and that people "used

then to eat one another throughout Erin." "They, the Scots," says the

poet Spenser, writing centuries later, "utterly consumed and wasted

whatsoever was before left unspoyled so that of all towns, castles,

forts, bridges, and habitations they left not a stick standing, nor yet

any people remayning, for those few which yet survived fledde from their

fury further into the English Pale that now is. Thus was all that goodly

country utterly laid waste."

Such insane destruction brought its own punishment. The colonists began

to recover from their dismay. Ormonds, Kildares, and Desmonds bestirred

themselves to collect troops. The O'Connors, who with all their tribe

had risen in arms, had been utterly defeated at Athenry, where the young

king Fedlim and no less than 10,000 of his followers are said to have

been left dead. Roger Mortimer, the new viceroy, was re-organizing the

government in Dublin. The clergy, stimulated by a Papal mandate, had all

now turned against the invader. Robert Bruce had some time previously

been recalled to Scotland, and Sir John de Bermingham, the victor of

Athenry, pushing northward at the head of 15,000 chosen troops, met the

younger Bruce at Dundalk. The combat was hot, short, and decisive. The

Scots were defeated, Edward Bruce himself killed, and his head struck

off and sent to London. The rest hastened back to Scotland with as

little delay as possible. The Scotch invasion was over.

It was over, but its effects remained. From one end of Ireland to the

other there was disaffection, anger, revolt. England had proved too weak

or too negligent to interfere at the right time and in the right way,

and although successful in the end she could not turn back the tide.

There was a general feeling of disbelief in the reality of her

government. A semi-national feeling had sprung up which temporarily

united colonists and natives in a bond of self-defence. Norman nobles

and native Irish chieftains threw in their lot together. The English

yeoman class, which had begun to get established in Leinster and

Munster, had been all but utterly destroyed by Edward Bruce, and the

remnant now left the country in despair. The great English lords, with

the exception of Ormond and Kildare, from this out took Irish names and

adopted Irish dress and fashions. The two De Burghs, as already stated,

seized upon the Connaught possessions of their cousin, and divided them,

taking the one Galway and the other Mayo, and calling themselves

McWilliam Eighter and McWilliam Oughter, or the Nether and the Further

Burkes. So too with nearly all the rest. Bermingham of Athenry, in spite

of his late famous victory over the Irish, did the same, calling himself

McYorris; Fitzmaurice of Lixnaw became McMaurice; FitzUrse of Louth,

McMahon; and so on through a whole list.

The Story of Ireland · 第 6 / 24 段