The invasion of Ireland by the Anglo-Normans differs in several respects

from other invasions and conquests, not the least singular feature about

it being that nearly the whole of that famous band of knightly

adventurers who took part in it, and to whose audacity it was in the

first instance due, were more or less closely related to one another,

either as brothers, nephews, uncles, or cousins. The connecting link

between these variously-named relations was one Nesta, princess of South

Wales, daughter of a Welsh king, Rice ap Tudor, a heroine whose

adventures are of a sufficiently striking, not to say startling,

character. By dint of a succession of alliances, some regular, others

highly irregular, she became the ancestress of nearly all the great

Anglo-Norman families in Ireland. Of these the Fitzgeralds, Carews,

Barrys, and Cogans, are descended from her first husband, Gerald of

Windsor. Robert FitzStephen, who plays, as will presently be seen, a

prominent part in the conquest, was the son of her second husband,

Stephen, the Castlelan of Abertivy, while Robert and Meiler FitzHenry,

of whom we shall also hear, are said to have been the sons of no less a

person than King Henry I. of England.

[Illustration: WEST FRONT OF ST. CRONAN'S CHURCH, ROSCREA. (_From a

Photograph_.)]

Conspicuous amongst this band of knights and adventurers was one who was

himself no knight, but a priest and the self-appointed chronicler of the

rest, Gerald de Barri--better known as Gerald of Wales, or Giraldus

Cambrensis, who was the grandson of Nesta, through her daughter

Angareta.

Giraldus is one of those writers whom, to tell the truth, we like a

great deal better than they deserve. He is prejudiced to the point of

perversity, and gullible almost to sublimity, uncritical even for an

eminently uncritical age, accepting and retailing any and every

monstrous invention, the more readily apparently in proportion to its

monstrosity. For all that--despite his prejudices, despite even his

often deliberate perversion of the truth, it is difficult to avoid a

certain kindliness for him. To the literary student he is indeed a

captivating figure. With his half-Welsh, half-Norman blood; with the

nimble, excitable, distinctly Celtic vein constantly discernible in him;

with a love of fighting which could hardly have been exceeded by the

doughtiest of the knights, his cousins and brothers; with a pen that

seems to fly like an arrow across the page; with a conceit which knows

neither stint nor limit, he is the most entertaining, the most vividly

alive of chroniclers; no historian certainly in any rigid sense of the

word, but the first, as he was also unquestionably the chief and prince

of war correspondents.

Whether we like him or not, we at any rate cannot dispense with him,

seeing that nearly everything we know of the Ireland of the Conquest, we

know from those marvellous pages of his, which, if often exasperating,

are at any rate never dull. In them, as in a mirror, we see how, when,

and where the whole plan of the campaign was laid; who took part in it;

what they said, did, projected; their very motives and thoughts--the

whole thing stands out fresh and alive as if it had happened yesterday.

There were no lack of motives, any of which would have been temptation

enough for invasion. To the pious it took on the alluring guise of a

Crusade. The Irish Church, which had obtained such glowing fame in its

early days, had long since, as we have seen, grown into very bad repute

with Rome. Despite that halo of early sanctity, she was held to be

seriously tainted with heresy. She allowed bishops to be irregularly

multiplied, and consecrated contrary to the Roman rule by one bishop

only; tithes and firstfruits were not collected with any regularity;

above all, the collection of Peter's pence, being the sum of one penny

due from every household, was always scandalously in arrears, nay, often

no attempt was made to collect it at all. She did many wrong things, but

it may shrewdly be suspected that this was one of the very worst

of them.

[Illustration: WEST DOORWAY OF FRESHFORD CHURCH, CO. KILKENNY. _(From a

Photograph.)_]

It is not a little edifying at this juncture to find the Danes of Dublin

amongst those who were enlisted upon the orthodox side. Cut off by

mutual hatred rather than theological differences from the Church of

Ireland, they had for some time back been regularly applying to

Canterbury for their supply of priests. These priests upon being sent

over painted the condition of Irish heterodoxy in tints of the deepest

black for their own countrymen. Even before this there had been grave

complaints. Lanfranc, Anselm, St. Bernard of Clairvaux, all had had

their theological ire aroused against the Irish recusants. Many of the

Irish ecclesiastics themselves seem to have desired that closer union

with Rome, which could only be brought about by bringing Ireland under

the power of a sworn son of the Church. Henry I--little as that most

secular-minded of monarchs cared probably for the more purely

theological question--was fully alive to its value as supporting his own

claims. He obtained from Pope Hadrian IV. (the Englishman Brakespeare),

a Bull sanctioning and approving of the conquest of Ireland as prompted

by "the ardour of faith and love of religion," in which Bull he is

desired to enter the island and therein execute "whatever shall pertain

to the honour of God, and the welfare of the land."

Fourteen years elapsed before the enterprise thus warmly commended was

carried into effect. The story of Dermot McMurrough, king of Leinster,

and his part in the invasion, has often been told, and does not, I

think, need dwelling upon at any great length. He was a brutal,

violent-tempered savage, detested in his own country, and especially by

his unfortunate subjects in Leinster. How he foully wronged the honour

of O'Rorke, a chieftain of Connaught; how, for this and other offences,

he was upon the accession of Roderick O'Connor driven away from Ireland;

how he fled to England to do homage to Henry, and seek his protection;

how, finding him gone to Aquitaine, he followed him there, and in return

for his vows of allegiance received letters authorizing the king's

subjects to enlist if they choose for the Irish service; how armed with

these he went to Wales, and there succeeded in recruiting a band of

mixed Norman and Norman-Welsh adventurers--all this is recorded at large

in the histories.

Of the recruits thus enlisted, the most important was Robert de Clair,

Earl of Pembroke and Chepstow, nicknamed by his contemporaries,

Strongbow, whom Dermot met at Bristol, and won over by a double

bribe--the hand, namely, of his daughter Eva, and the succession to the

sovereignty of Leinster--a succession which, upon the Irish mode of

election, he had, it may be observed, no shadow of right to dispose of.

Giraldus, who seems to have been himself in Wales at the time, speaks

sentimentally of the unfortunate exile, and describes him inhaling the

scent of his beloved country from the Welsh coast, and feasting his eyes

tenderly upon his own land: "Although the distance," he more prosaically

adds, "being very great, it was difficult to distinguish mountains from

clouds." As a matter of fact, Dermot McMurrough, we may be sure, was not

the person to do anything of the sort. He was simply hungry--as a wild

beast or a savage is hungry--for revenge, and would have plunged into

any number of perjuries, or have bound himself to give away any amount

of property he had no right to dispose of in order to get it. He could

safely trust, too, he knew, to the ignorance of his new allies as to

what was or was not a legal transfer in Ireland.

His purpose achieved, "inflamed," says Giraldus, "with the desire to see

his native land," but really the better to concoct his plans, he

returned home, landing a little south of Arklow Head, and arriving at

Ferns, where he was hospitably entertained during the winter by its

bishop. The following spring, in the month of May, the first instalment

of the invaders arrived under Robert FitzStephen, a small fleet of Welsh

boats landing them in a creek of the bay of Bannow, where a chasm

between the rocks was long known as "FitzStephen's stride."

Here they were met by Donald McMurrough, son of Dermot, and ten days

later drew up under the walls of Wexford, having so far encountered no

opposition.

In this old Danish town a stout fight was made. The townsfolk, no longer

Vikings but simple traders, did what they could in their own defence.

They burnt their suburbs, consisting doubtless of rude wooden huts; shut

the gates, and upon the first two assaults drove back the assailants. So

violently were they repelled, "that they withdrew," Giraldus tells us,

"in all great haste from the walls." His own younger brother, Robert de

Barri, was amongst the wounded, a great stone falling upon his helmet

and tumbling him headlong into one of the ditches, from the effects of

which blow, that careful historian informs us incidentally, "Sixteen

years later all his jaw teeth fell out!"

Next morning, after mass, they renewed the assault; this time with more

circumspection. Now there were at that time, as it happened, two bishops

in the town, who devoted their energies to endeavouring to induce the

citizens to make peace. In this attempt they were successful, more

successful than might have been expected with men descended from the old

Land Leapers. Wexford opened its gates, its townsmen submitting to

Dermot, who thereupon presented the town to his allies, FitzStephen,

true to his Norman instincts, proceeding forthwith to build a castle

upon the rock of Carneg, at the narrowest point of the river Slaney, the

first of that large crop of castles which subsequently sprang up upon

Irish soil.

The next sharers of the struggle were the wild Ossory clans, who

gathered to the defence of their territory under Donough McPatrick, an

old and especially hated enemy of Dermot's. The latter had now three

thousand men at his back, in addition to his Welsh and Norman allies.

The Ossory men fought, as Giraldus admits, with furious valour, but upon

rashly venturing out of their own forests into the open, were charged by

FitzStephen, whose horsemen defeated them, killing a great number, over

two hundred heads being collected and laid at the feet of Dermot, who,

"turning them over, one by one, to recognize them, lifted his hands to

heaven in excess of joy, and with a loud voice returned thanks to God

most High." So pious was Dermot!

After this, finding that the country at large was beginning to take some

note of their proceedings, the invaders fell back upon Ferns, which they

fortified according to the science of the age under the superintendence

of Robert FitzStephen. Roderick O'Connor, the Ard-Reagh, was by this

time not unnaturally beginning to get alarmed, and had gathered his men

together against the invaders. The winter, however, was now at hand, and

a temporary peace was accordingly patched up; Leinster being restored to

Dermot on condition of his acknowledging the over-lordship of Roderick.

Giraldus recounts at much length the speeches made upon both sides on

this occasion; the martial addresses to the troops, the many classical

and flowery quotations, which last he is good enough to bestow upon the

unlucky Roderick no less than upon his own allies. Seeing, probably,

that all were alike imaginary, it is hardly necessary to delay to

record them.

The next to arrive upon the scene was Maurice Fitzgerald, half brother

of Robert FitzStephen and uncle of Giraldus. Strongbow meanwhile was

still upon the eastern side of the channel awaiting the return of his

uncle, Hervey de Montmorency, whom he had sent over to report upon the

condition of affairs. Even after Hervey's return bringing with him a

favourable report, he had still the king's permission to gain. Early in

1170 he again sought Henry and this time received an ambiguous reply,

which, however, he chose to interpret in his own favour. He sent back

Hervey to Ireland, accompanied by Raymond Fitzgerald, surnamed Le Gros,

and a score of knights with some seventy archers. These, landing in

Kilkenny, entrenched themselves, and being shortly afterwards attacked

by the Danes of Waterford, defeated them with great slaughter, seizing a

number of prisoners. Over these prisoners a dispute arose; Raymond was

for sparing their lives, Hervey de Montmorency for slaying. The

eloquence of the latter prevailed. "The citizens," says Giraldus, "as

men condemned, had their limbs broken and were cast headlong into the

sea and so drowned."

Shortly after this satisfactory beginning, Strongbow himself appeared

with reinforcements. He attacked Waterford, which was taken after a

short but furious resistance, and the united forces of Dermot and the

Earl marched into the town, where the marriage of the latter with Eva,

Dermot's daughter, was celebrated, as Maclise has represented it in his

picture, amid lowering smoke and heaps of the dead and dying.

Dermot was now on the top of the wave. With his English allies and his

own followers he had a considerable force around him. Guiding the latter

through the Wicklow mountains, which they would probably have hardly got

through unaided, he descended with them upon Dublin, and despite the

efforts of St. Lawrence O'Toole, its archbishop, to effect a pacific

arrangement, the town was taken by assault. The principal Danes, with

Hasculph, their Danish governor, escaped to their ships and sailed

hastily away for the Orkneys.

Meath was the next point to be attacked. O'Rorke, the old foe of Dermot,

who held it for King Roderick, was defeated; whereupon, in defiance of

his previous promises, Dermot threw off all disguise and proclaimed

himself king of Ireland, upon which Roderick, as the only retaliation

left in his power, slew Dermot's son who had been deposited in his hands

as hostage.

It was now Strongbow's aim to hasten back and place his new lordship at

the feet of his sovereign, already angry and jealous at such unlocked

for and uncountenanced successes. He was not able however to do so at

once. Hasculph the Dane returned suddenly with sixty ships, and a large

force under a noted Berserker of the day, known as John the Mad,

"warriors," says Giraldus, "armed in Danish fashion, having long

breast-plates and shirts of mail, their shields round and bound about

with iron. They were iron-hearted," he says, "as well as

iron-armed men."

In spite of their arms and their hearts, he is able triumphantly to

proclaim their defeat. Milo de Cogan, the Norman governor of Dublin,

fell upon his assailants suddenly. John the Mad was slain, as were also

nearly all the Berserkers. Hasculph was brought back in triumph, and

promptly beheaded by the conquerors.

He was hardly dead before a new assailant, Godred, king of Man, appeared

with thirty ships at the mouth of the Liffy. Roderick, in the meanwhile,

had collected men from every part of Ireland, with the exception of the

north which stood aloof from him, and now laid siege to Dublin by land,

helped by St. Lawrence its patriotic archbishop. Strongbow was thus shut

in with foes behind and before, and the like disaster had befallen

Robert FitzStephen, who was at this time closely besieged in his own new

castle at Wexford. Dermot their chief native ally had recently died.

There seemed for a while a reasonable chance that the invaders would be

driven back and pushed bodily into the sea.

Discipline and science however again prevailed. The besieged, excited

both by their own danger and that of their friends in the south, made a

desperate sally. The Irish army kept no watch, and was absolutely

undrilled. A panic set in. The besiegers fled, leaving behind them their

stores of provisions, and the conquerors thereupon marched away in

triumph to the relief of FitzStephen. Here they were less successful. By

force, or according to Giraldus, by a pretended tale of the destruction

of all the other invaders, the Wexford men seized possession of him and

the other English, and had them flung into a dungeon. Finding that

Strongbow and the rest were not destroyed, but that on the contrary they

were marching down on them, the Wexford men set fire to their own town

and departed to an island in the harbour, carrying their prisoner with

them and threatening if pursued to cut off his head.

Foiled in this attempt, Strongbow hastened to Waterford, took boat

there, and flew to meet the king, whom he encountered near Gloucester

with a large army. Henry's greeting was a wrathful one. His anger and

jealousy had been thoroughly aroused. Not unwarrantably. But for his

promptness his head-strong subjects--several of them it must be

remembered of his own dominant blood--would have been perfectly capable

of attempting to carve out a kingdom for themselves at his very gates.

Happily Strongbow had found the task too large for his unaided energies,

and, as we have seen, had barely escaped annihilation. He was ready,

therefore, to accept any terms which his sovereign chose to impose. His

submission appears to have disarmed the king. He allowed himself to be

pacified, and after a while they returned to Ireland together. Henry II.

landed at Waterford in the month of October, 1171.

[Illustration: SOUTH WINDOW OF ST. CAIMIN'S CHURCH, INISMAIN.]

XI.

HENRY II. IN IRELAND.

This was practically the end of the struggle. The king had four thousand

men-at-arms at his back, of whom no less than four hundred were knights.

In addition his ships contained vast stores of provisions, a variety of

war devices never before seen in Ireland, artizans for building bridges

and making roads--a whole war train, in short. Such a display of force

was felt to be irresistible. The chieftains one after the other came in

and made their submission. Dermot McCarthy, lord of Desmond and Cork,

was the first to do homage, followed by Donald O'Brien, Prince of

Thomond; while another Donald, chieftain of Ossory, rapidly followed

suit. The men of Wexford appeared, leading their prisoner with them by a

chain, and presenting him as an offering to his master, who, first

rating him soundly for his unauthorized proceedings, ordered him to be

chained to another prisoner and shut up in Reginald's tower. Later,

soothed by his own triumph, or touched, as Giraldus tells us, with

compassion for a brave man, he, at the intercession of some of his

courtiers, forgave and restored him to his possessions, reserving,

however, the town of Wexford for himself.

From Wexford Henry marched to Dublin, having first visited Tipperary and

Waterford. The Danes at once submitted and swore allegiance; so also did

O'Carrol of Argial, O'Rorke of Brefny, and all the minor chieftains of

Leinster; Roderick O'Connor still stood at bay behind the Shannon, and

the north also remained aloof and hostile, but air the other chieftains,

great and small, professed themselves willing to become tributaries of

the king of England.

The idea of an Ard-Reagh, or Over-lord, was no new one, as we have seen,

to any of them. Theoretically they had always acknowledged one,

although, practically, he had rarely exercised any authority save over

his own immediate subjects. Their feeling about Henry was doubtless the

same. They were as willing to swear fealty to him as to Roderick

O'Connor, more so in fact, seeing that he was stronger than Roderick,

but that was all. To Henry and to his successors this recognition

carried with it all the complicated dependence of feudalism, which in

England meant that his land and everything else which a man possessed

was his only so long as he did service for it to the king. To these new

Irish subjects, who had never heard of feudalism, it entailed nothing of

the sort. They regarded it as a mere vague promise of adhesion, binding

them at most to a general muster or "hosting" under his arms in case of

war or some common peril. This was an initial misconception, which

continued, as will be seen, to be a deeper and deeper source of

confusion as the years went on.

In the meanwhile Henry was established in Dublin, where he kept

Christmas in high state, occupying a palace built in the native fashion

of painted wicker-work, set up just outside the walls. Here he

entertained the chiefs, who were naturally astonished at the splendour

of his entertainments. "They learnt," Giraldus observes with

satisfaction, "to eat cranes"--does this mean herons?--"a species of

food which they had previously loathed;" and, in general, were suitably

impressed with the greatness and glory of the conqueror. The bishops

were most of them already warmly in his favour, and at a synod shortly

afterwards held at Cashel, at which all the Irish clergy were

represented, the Church of Ireland was solemnly declared to be finally

united to that of England, and it was laid down that, "as by Divine

Providence Ireland has received her lord and king from England, so she

should also submit to a reformation from the same source."

The weather that winter was so rough that hardly a ship could cross the

channel, and Henry in his new kingdom found himself practically cut off

from his old one. About the middle of Lent, the wind veering at last to

the east, ships arrived from England and Aquitaine, bearers of very ill

news to the king. Two legates were on their way, sent by the Pope, to

inquire into the murder of Becket, and armed in case of an

unsatisfactory reply with all the terrors of an interdict. Henry hastily

made over the government of Ireland to Hugo de Lacy, whom he placed in

Dublin as his representative, and sailed from Wexford upon Easter

Monday. He never again revisited his new dominions, where many of the

lessons inculcated by him--including possibly the delights of eating

cranes--were destined before long to be forgotten.

XII.

EFFECTS OF THE ANGLO-NORMAN INVASION.

Henry had been only six months in Ireland, but he had accomplished

much--more certainly than any other English ruler ever accomplished

afterwards within the same time. He had divided the ceded districts into

counties; had appointed sheriffs for them; had set up three Law

Courts--Bench, Pleas, and Exchequer; had arranged for the going on

circuit by judges; and had established his own character for orthodoxy,

and acquitted himself of his obligations to the papacy by freeing all

church property from the exactions of the chiefs, and rigidly enforcing

the payment of tithes.

In a still more important point--that about which he was evidently

himself most tenacious--his success was even more complete. He once for

all put a stop to all danger of an independent lordship by forcing those

who had already received grants of land from the native chiefs to

surrender them into his hands, and to receive them back direct from

himself, according to the ordinary terms of feudal tenure.

That he had larger and more statesmanlike views for the new dependency

than he was ever able to carry out there can be no question. As early as

1177 he appointed his youngest son John king of Ireland, and seems to

have fully formed the intention of sending him over as a permanent

governor or viceroy, a purpose which the misconduct of that youthful

Rehoboam, as Giraldus calls him, was chiefly instrumental in foiling.

It is curious to hear this question of a royal viceroy and a permanent

royal residence in Ireland coming to the front so very early in the

history of English rule there. That the experiment, if fairly tried, and

tried with a man of the calibre of Henry himself, might have made the

whole difference in the future of Ireland, we cannot, I think,

reasonably doubt. Any government, indeed, so that it was central, so

that it gathered itself into a single hand and took its impress from a

single mind, would have been better a thousand times than the miserable

condition of half-conquest, half-rule, whole anarchy and confusion which

set in and continued with hardly a break.

This is one reason more why it is so much to be regretted that Ireland,

save for a few years, had never any real king or central government of

her own. Had this been the case, even if she had been eventually

conquered by England--as would likely enough have been the case--the

result of that conquest would have been different. There would have been

some one recognized point of government and organization, and the

struggle would have been more violent and probably more successful at

first, but less chronic and less eternally renewed in the long run. As

it was, all the conditions were at their very worst. No native ruler of

the calibre of a Brian Boru could ever again hope to unite all Ireland

under him, since long before he arrived at that point his enemies would

have called in the aid of the new colonists, who would have fallen upon

and annihilated him, though after doing so they would have been as

little able to govern the country for themselves as before.

The Story of Ireland · 第 5 / 24 段