EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE[157]

_CROSS-EXAMINATION_

* * * * *

MR. MCHANEY: And you suggested and asked him [defendant Mrugowsky] to

carry out experiments with Copenhagen vaccine in the typhus experiments

in Buchenwald, didn’t you?

DEFENDANT ROSE: I was asking whether there was still a possibility of

carrying out such a series of experiments. That is quite understandable,

considering the situation, because one can see from my report of 29 May

1943, that this seemed to constitute a considerable advance on the

experiments already made on animals. I knew that such experiments had

been carried out earlier, although I basically objected to these

experiments. This institution had been set up in Germany and was

approved by the state and covered by the state. At that moment I was in

a position which might correspond to that of a lawyer who is, perhaps, a

basic opponent of capital punishment. On occasions when he is dealing

with leading members of the government or with lawyers during public

congresses or meetings, he will do everything in his power to maintain

his opinion on the subject and have it put into effect. If, however, he

does not succeed, he stays in his profession and in his environment in

spite of this. Under certain circumstances he may perhaps even be forced

to pronounce such a death sentence himself, although he is basically an

opponent of the principle. Of course, it does not go as far as this in

my case. I am only in touch with people of whom I assume that they

somehow are included in the official channels of such an institution,

which I disapprove of basically, and which I want to see removed.

Q. Professor, six persons died in this experiment with the Copenhagen

vaccine, didn’t they?

A. Yes. They were six people who were furnished by the Reich Criminal

Police Office through ordinary channels as determined by competent

agencies.

* * * * *

-----

[149] Closing statement is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 14 July

1947, pp. 10718-10796.

[150] Defendant before International Military Tribunal. See Trial of the

Major War Criminals, Vols. I-XLII, Nuremberg, 1947.

[151] Final plea is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 18 July 1947,

pp. 11220-11244.

[152] Defendant in case of United States _vs._ Ernst von Weizsaecker, et

al. See Vols. XII, XIII, XIV.

[153] United States _vs._ Josef Altstoetter, et al. See Vol. III.

[154] Final plea is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 16 July 1947,

pp. 10922-10941.

[155] Trial of the Major War Criminals, vol. XVII, pp. 458-494,

Nuremberg, 1948.

[156] Complete testimony is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 3, 4,

5, 6, 7 Feb. 1947, pp. 2301-2661.

[157] Complete testimony is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 18, 21,

22, 23, 24, 25 Apr. 1947, pp. 6081-6484.

Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I · 第 482 / 486 题