No expert was present. (_NO-907, Pros. Ex. 412._)

In the proceedings 14 f 13, the consideration of the disease was

not the main thing.

Here there is talk about “special treatment 14 f 13”; it has

nothing to do with euthanasia but is extermination. (_NO-158,

Pros. Ex. 410._)

Correspondence of the Main Economic and Administration Office

with the concentration camp Gross-Rosen. (_1234-PS, Pros. Ex.

555._) Only special treatment is mentioned. The word

“euthanasia” nowhere appears.

_Examination._ The fact that the Mauthausen concentration camp is

mentioned as a place of execution, which was not empowered to carry out

the euthanasia within the framework of the order of 1 September 1939,

shows the arbitrariness of the “action.” It must be assumed that Himmler

included Bernburg, favorably situated to him, in the exercise of his own

full powers. The difference in the examination according to the

directions and according to the proceedings applied in the concentration

camp is shown in the correspondence of Mennecke.

Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I · 第 443 / 486 题