Top Secret

Subject: Experiments with aconitine nitrate projectiles

To the Criminological Institute [Stamp]

attn: Dr. Widmann

Berlin Criminological Institute

Department: Chemistry

received: 13 Sep 1944

Journal No. g 53/44

in charge:

In the presence of SS Sturmbannfuehrer Dr. Ding, Dr. Widmann, and the

undersigned, experiments with aconitine nitrate projectiles were

conducted on 11 September 1944 on 5 persons who had been condemned to

death. The projectiles in question were of a 7.65 mm. caliber, filled

with crystallized poison. The experimental subjects, in a lying

position, were each shot in the upper part of the left thigh. The thighs

of two of them were cleanly shot through. Even afterwards, no effect of

the poison was to be observed. These two experimental subjects were

therefore exempted.

The entrance of the projectile did not show any peculiarities. Evidently

the arteria femoralis of one of the subjects were injured. A slight

stream of blood issued from the wound. But the bleeding stopped after a

short time. The loss of blood was estimated as having been at the most ¾

of a liter, and consequently was on no account fatal.

The symptoms of the condemned three showed a surprising similarity. At

first no peculiarities appeared. After 20 to 25 minutes a motor

agitation and a slight ptyalism set in, but stopped again. After 40 to

45 minutes a stronger salivation set in. The poisoned persons swallowed

repeatedly, but later the flow of saliva became so strong that it could

not even be overcome by swallowing. Foamy saliva flowed from their

mouths. Then choking and vomiting set in.

After 58 minutes the pulse of two of them could no longer be felt. The

third had a pulse rate of 76. After 65 minutes his blood pressure was

90/60. The sounds were extremely low. A reduction of blood pressure was

evident.

During the first hour of the experiment the pupils did not show any

changes. After 78 minutes the pupils of all three showed a medium

dilation together with a retarded light reaction. Simultaneously,

maximum respiration with heavy breathing inhalations set in. This

subsided after a few minutes. The pupils contracted again and their

reaction improved. After 65 minutes the patellar and achilles tendon

reflexes of the poisoned subjects were negative. The abdominal reflexes

of two of them were also negative. The upper abdominal reflexes of the

third were still positive, while the lower were negative. After

approximately 90 minutes, one of the subjects again started breathing

heavily. This was accompanied by an increasing motor unrest. Then the

heavy breathing changed into a flat, accelerated respiration,

accompanied by extreme nausea. One of the poisoned persons tried in vain

to vomit. To do so he introduced four fingers of his hand up to the

knuckles into his throat, but nevertheless could not vomit. His face was

flushed.

The other two experimental subjects had already early shown a pale face.

The other symptoms were the same. The motor unrest increased so much

that the persons flung themselves up, and down, rolled their eyes and

made meaningless motions with their hands and arms. Finally the

agitation subsided, the pupils dilated to the maximum, and the condemned

lay motionless. Masseter spasms and urination were observed in one case.

Death occurred 121, 123, and 129 minutes after entry of the projectile.

_Summary._ The projectiles filled with approximately 38 mg. of aconitine

nitrate in solid form had, in spite of only insignificant injuries, a

deadly effect after two hours. Poisoning showed 20 to 25 minutes after

injury. The main reactions were salivation, alteration of the pupils,

negative tendon reflexes, motor unrest, and extreme nausea.

[Signature] MRUGOWSKY

SS Lecturer Oberfuehrer and Office Chief.

* * * * *

_Poison Projectile of a Russian 7.65 Caliber Pistol Cartridge_

(Perspective view, scale 10:1)

[Illustration]

The projectile is cut open and ¼ of the lead core (1 segment) is

removed. The lead seal at the bottom of the projectile is not shown in

this illustration. The section is clearly visible on the right half of

the jacket of the projectile.

Criminological Institute of the Security Police

Department: Chemistry

Journal No. g 15/44

_Russian 7.65 mm. Caliber Pistol Cartridge with Poison Projectile_

(Stamp on bottom of cartridge case: Geco)

[Illustration]

Criminological Institute of the Security Police

Department: Chemistry

EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS DR.

EUGEN KOGON[70]

_DIRECT EXAMINATION_

* * * * *

MR. MCHANEY: Do you know anything about experiments with poisons in the

Buchenwald concentration camp?

WITNESS KOGON: I know of two such cases. The one case was about the turn

of the year 1943-44 or in the late fall of 1943, and the second case was

probably in the summer of 1944. In each case Russian prisoners of war

were used for these experiments. In the first case various preparations

of the so-called alkaloid series were put into noodle soup and

administered to 40 of these prisoners of war who were in Block 46. They,

of course, had no idea what was going on. Two of these prisoners became

so sick that they vomited, one was unconscious, the fourth showed no

symptoms at all. Thereupon, all four were strangled in the crematorium.

They were dissected and the contents of their stomachs and other effects

were determined. The experiment was ordered by the SS court, by the SS

investigating judge, Sturmbannfuehrer Dr. Morgen. It was carried out in

the presence of Dr. Ding, Dr. Morgen, Dr. Wehner, SS Hauptsturmfuehrer

and SS judges, and one of the three camp leaders, I do not know whether

it was SS Sturmbannfuehrer Schubert or SS leader Florstedt. The second

experiments—

Q. Witness, before continuing with the second experiment, I wonder if

you could tell the Tribunal the reason why this poison experiment which

you have just mentioned was carried out?

A. In the summer of 1943 the SS court in Berlin was trying the former

commander of Buchenwald and later commander of the Lublin concentration

camp in Poland, SS Standartenfuehrer Koch. The trial was reaching its

climax. The investigation had led to very serious charges against Koch.

Here I must mention that SS Obergruppenfuehrer Prince Waldeck, then head

of the SS main district [Oberabschnitt] Fulda-Werra, was personally

opposing Koch, and it was merely this personal antagonism of the two men

which had brought about the trial. A man by the name of Koehler, a

Hauptscharfuehrer in Buchenwald, was arrested by Dr. Morgen and kept in

custody in the Buchenwald concentration camp. This Hauptscharfuehrer

seemed to have testified against Koch. Two or three days later this

Hauptscharfuehrer Koehler was found dead in his cell. A few hours before

he had been quite healthy. He seemed to have taken strong poison. Dr.

Morgen contended that Dr. Hoven, together with the guard,

Hauptscharfuehrer Sommer, had killed Koehler. Koehler was dissected in

the dissecting room in the presence of a scientist from Jena and two of

my comrades. The head of the pathology section was also present. Drugs

of the alkaloid series were found in the stomach of the dead man. The

amount and the specific type was not known. In order to determine the

fatal dosage of poisons of this type, the SS court ordered an experiment

on four Russian prisoners of war. This is the experiment which I have

just described in Block 46. On 20 September 1943, Dr. Hoven was arrested

on Dr. Morgen’s orders and remained in the custody of the SS court until

the end of March 1945. I know the date exactly because on that Saturday

afternoon Dr. Hoven came to Block 50 on his motorcycle, asked me about

Dr. Ding-Schuler, who was not there, and went away again quite

depressed. Half an hour later I learned from the hospital, the

prisoners’ hospital, that Dr. Hoven expected to be arrested himself.

Q. In other words, Hoven was suspected by Morgen of having done away

with the witness against Koch, is that right?

A. Yes.

Q. Now, will you explain to the Tribunal about his second poison

experiment?

A. In the summer of 1944—I am not quite sure of the exact date—Dr.

Ding, who was already called Schuler, came from Berlin at the time and

told me that he had a very unpleasant task to perform. He said it was

extremely secret and a few hours later, without my having asked, he told

me details about it in his room.

I must point out that at this time there was really nothing at all

private or official, that Dr. Schuler would not have told me in order to

get my advice. He realized quite clearly that the cause of National

Socialism was lost. He was only looking for safety.

He said, “Kogon, can you see any way of getting me out of this affair? I

am supposed to test a poison here on Russian prisoners of war. I have to

report on it immediately. It is a direct order from Mrugowsky. I don’t

know how I can get out of it.”

He gave me the prescription, the chemical formula of this poison, and I

was to put this prescription in an envelope and seal it in his presence.

In my haste I was not able to read it. It had some code name. I put the

prescription in the envelope and only said to him, because we were

interrupted, “You know my point of view.” I must add here that in long

conversations at night I had tried to explain to him that his only way

out was to do as much as possible for the political prisoners, but that

in serious cases he must, as a human being, refuse to carry out orders

which violated the moral laws.

He laughed when I said that and replied, “I know your religious and

moral ideas. You know I don’t believe in anything. This way is out of

the question for me; all I can do is comply with the first suggestion

and collaborate with the political prisoners.”

In this poison case, he went in great haste and excitement to the camp

leader, Sturmbannfuehrer Schubert, whom he had informed beforehand by

telephone, and the commander, Oberfuehrer Pister, who also knew about it

and they all went—I don’t know whether the camp physician was also

present—at any rate, they went to the crematorium, not to Block 46. The

Russian prisoners of war, again, four of them, had been taken there into

the cellar with the 46 hooks on the walls on which the people were

strangled. These four Russians were given this poison. I do not know how

it was administered. As Ding-Schuler told me later, they died in a very

short time. Then they were dissected and cremated. Dr. Ding did not send

a written report on this matter to Berlin. He told me he had to report

on it to Mrugowsky orally. Ding was not only excited about this matter,

but afterwards he was also very secretive about it. He did not want me

to talk about it any more. From indications in his conversation I

learned that there was some connection with experiments in the

Sachsenhausen concentration camp near Oranienburg which Mrugowsky had

performed in Ding’s presence. Prisoners must have been shot there with

poisoned bullets, because Ding said that a Russian prisoner of war had

succeeded in getting hold of a knife and attacking Mrugowsky, but that

the prisoner had been immediately overpowered.

In any case, Ding did not want to have anything more to do with the

matter, even in my presence. A short time later the prescription and the

sealed envelope were burned by Ding in my presence. He held it over a

candle in my presence and burned it. I could not find out what the

contents were.

* * * * *

-----

[67] United States _vs._ Oswald Pohl, et al. See Vol. V.

[68] Final plea is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 17 July 1947,

pp. 11049-11074.

[69] United States _vs._ Oswald Pohl, et al. See Vol. V.

[70] Complete testimony is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 6, 7, 8

Jan 1947, pp. 1150-1300. See also testimony of defendant Mrugowsky, sec.

VIII G, vol. II.

Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I · 第 346 / 486 题