3. _N-substance._ No experiments, no statement.

_C. Type of experimental subjects._

1. _F 1001._ The documents submitted do not reveal the nature of the

experimental subjects, though the year 1939 indicates that in no case

were foreigners used.

2. _“Lost”._ According to Sievers’ testimony, the persons used in the

experiments in the Natzweiler concentration camp volunteered, so that

the nature of the experimental subjects would appear to be of no

significance as a basis for judgment. The testimony of the defendant

Rudolf Brandt (_NO-372, Pros. Ex. 252_) is no basis to judge the true

state of affairs, as Rudolf Brandt’s testimony (_Tr. pp. 4930-34_) shows

that he himself never witnessed an experiment and that his statements

are conclusions drawn from documents and statements submitted by the

interrogators.

Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I · 第 225 / 486 题