CONSPIRACY TO MURDER BILL (1858).

=Source.=--_The Greville Memoirs_, edited by Henry Reeve, C.B., D.C.L.,

vol. viii., p. 164. (Longmans, Green and Co., 1888.)

_February 14 [1858]._--Last week saw the debates in the House of

Commons about the Conspiracy Bill, and the first act of the India Bill.

The first is very unpopular, but it will be carried nevertheless.

John Russell has taken it up with extraordinary vehemence and anger.

His opposition to it is furious on high constitutional grounds, which

appear to me absurd and uncalled for. If I were in Parliament I should

be puzzled how to vote, for there is much to be said against the Bill,

and much against voting against it, particularly against leave to

bring it in. Almost all the Tories voted with the Government, and John

Russell carried very few with him, and neither of his own nephews.

He is more than ever exasperated against Palmerston for bringing it

in. The apology tended by the Emperor, which was read to the House,

reconciled a great many to the Bill, but I have no notion that it will

do any good, or that the French Government will be satisfied with it.

After such a Bill, which will certainly be carried, the British lion

must put his tail between his legs, and, “Civis Romanus,” give up

swaggering so loftily. If Aberdeen had attempted such a measure when

Louis Philippe was King and Guizot minister, what would Palmerston have

said? and what would not have been the indignant outcry throughout the

country?

[NOTE.--On February 19 the Government were defeated on the Conspiracy

Bill in the House of Commons by a majority of 234 to 215. The majority

consisted of 146 Conservatives and 84 Liberals. Mr. Gladstone, Lord

John Russell, Sir James Graham, and Mr. Sidney Herbert voted against

the Bill. Lord Palmerston immediately resigned.]

From Palmerston to Disraeli (1856-1876) · 第 23 / 116 题