CHAPTER V.

THE MONKS AND FRIARS AT OXFORD.

[Sidenote: Benedictines and Augustinians]

The history of the monastic settlements at Oxford, and of their

connection with the University, still remains to be written, but

enough is known to show how great a part they played in its earlier

life. For some time before, and for two generations after the Norman

Conquest, the Benedictine monks of St. Frideswide, having displaced

the secular canons, seem to have been the only body of regular clergy

in Oxford. In the monasteries of this Order had been sheltered most

of the scanty learning and culture which survived the night of the

Dark Ages. Having been well nigh crushed out and despoiled of their

few literary treasures in two Danish invasions, they had revived and

extended their influence in the eleventh century. In the reign of Henry

I., Roger, Bishop of Salisbury, is said to have established a convent

of Augustinian canons at St. Frideswide’s, under the care of Guimond,

chaplain to the King, and soon after 1129 they were reinforced by a

society of the same Order inhabiting the new abbey founded in that year

at Oseney. It does not clearly appear how far the Benedictines were

dislodged from Oxford by the new-comers, but they probably retained

houses there for their students until they obtained possession of

Gloucester Hall.

[Sidenote: Rise of mendicant Orders]

If the claustral schools of the Benedictines were the nursery of

the University, a still more powerful impulse was imparted to it

at a later period by the rise of the two great mendicant Orders,

both of which received munificent aid from Henry III. In 1221 the

Dominicans, or Black Friars, first appeared in Oxford, and located

themselves in the heart of the Jewry, from which they migrated forty

years afterwards into a new monastery by the water-gate in the parish

of St. Ebbe’s, near the modern Speedwell Street. Two or three years

later a little band of Franciscans, or Grey Friars, after a temporary

residence in Canterbury and London, found their way to Oxford, where

they were hospitably entertained by the Dominicans, and obtained the

loan of a house or hall in the parish of St. Ebbe’s. Notwithstanding

their exemplary self-denial and boundless charity, they succeeded in

accumulating funds sufficient to build a magnificent church on a site

near Paradise Gardens, and opened schools of their own. After the lapse

of another generation—in 1251 or 1252—a company of Augustinian Friars

were sent into England by Lanfranc, of Milan, and a detachment of

them settled on the southern part of the site now occupied by Wadham

College, purchased for them by Sir John Handlow, of Boarstall. Here

were instituted those famous disputations which, under the name of

‘Austins,’ became the chief school of academical grammar teaching in

the Middle Ages, and survived in a degenerate form until the end of the

last century. In 1254 the Carmelite, or White Friars, took up their

abode close by the Castle, whence they were transferred to Beaumont

Palace by Edward II. in 1313. In 1281 or 1291 Edmund, Earl of Cornwall,

founded, or refounded, the Cistercian Abbey of Rewley, and established

a brotherhood of Trinitarians without the East Gate. Meanwhile the

Benedictines had adopted Gloucester Hall (now Worcester College) as a

seminary for their younger members.

[Sidenote: Claustral schools]

Other smaller religious fraternities are known to have existed in

Oxford, and neighbouring abbeys, such as those of Oseney, Eynsham,

Littlemore, and Dorchester, kept houses in Oxford for the instruction

of boys and young men under their special charge. The systematic

teaching of theology was doubtless the main object of the lessons given

in the old claustral schools, and the curriculum of secular education

was as meagre in reality as it was imposing in profession. Yet even

in these a true spirit of scholarship was kept alive, and the great

teachers of the mendicant Orders were the leading exponents of the new

Aristotelian philosophy, which inspired the subtlest intellects of

the thirteenth century with the power of a revelation. These Orders

possessed a great advantage over the University itself, before colleges

were founded, in occupying handsome and spacious buildings, attractive

to poor students, while the University schools or lecture rooms were

apparently little better than sheds, and St. Mary’s Church was the one

edifice capable of being used for solemn academical functions.

[Sidenote: Migration from Paris and influence of Robert Grosteste]

Two causes favoured the rapid establishment of the mendicant Orders,

and especially of the Franciscans, in the schools of Oxford. In the

year 1228 a memorable conflict took place between the students and

citizens in Paris, in which the students were grossly maltreated.

Queen Blanche refused them redress, but Henry III. invited them to

settle in England, and Oxford, as well as Cambridge, benefited largely

by the migration which ensued.[7] These Paris students were mostly

the disciples of Dominican or Franciscan professors, some of whom

seem to have accompanied them, and when the Dominicans again became

paramount at Paris, the Franciscans retained a stronghold at Oxford.

Here they owed much to the powerful aid and patronage of Robert

Grosteste, the great scholastical and ecclesiastical reformer of the

thirteenth century. The fame of this remarkable man for scholarship,

as well as piety, rests upon the universal testimony of his own and

the succeeding age, including that of Roger Bacon, himself perhaps the

brightest luminary of mediæval Oxford. But it is only of late that his

influence upon the University has been fully understood. It was indeed

an extraordinary chance which elevated to the See of Lincoln, then

possessing a paramount jurisdiction over the University of Oxford, a

man who had been the foremost of Oxford teachers, the first theological

lecturer of the Franciscans. It was as a working professor and _Rector

scholarum_ that he infused new life into University studies by the

comprehensive vigour and originality of his teaching. When he commenced

his stormy episcopate in 1235, his attention was inevitably directed

to larger questions then disturbing the peace of Church and State,

but his spirit animated his staunch friend and successor, Adam Marsh

(or de Marisco), the great Franciscan college-tutor, as he may well

be called. It is the glory of the Franciscans to have produced in the

same age Adam Marsh and Roger Bacon, who is sometimes claimed as an

early Fellow of Merton College, but who really belongs to a period

immediately preceding the foundation of colleges. Though Roger Bacon

attests the premature degeneracy of the mendicant Orders in his own

lifetime, though his bold vindication of scientific truth is little

in harmony with the abject submission to Papal authority enjoined

upon the friars, and though he was actually persecuted by his own

community for persevering in his scientific researches, yet he was

essentially a Franciscan. It was in obedience to his patron, Clement

IV., that he compiled his three great treatises, embodying a knowledge

which no other scholar of his time possessed, advocating the claims

of mathematics and language against the frivolous dialectics of the

mediæval schools, and censuring without reserve the organised ignorance

which then usurped the place of science and philosophy.

[Sidenote: Position of the friars at Oxford, and University statutes

against them]

It is extremely difficult to ascertain the nature of the control which

the friars acquired over academical studies, or the place, if any,

which they occupied in the academical system. Of their proselytising

activity we have abundant evidence, and this was probably the motive of

their constant efforts to secure the privilege of reading and lecturing

in their own schools, instead of in those of the University; efforts

which at Paris seem to have been more or less successful. At Oxford

they are clearly recognised as religious bodies in a curious ordinance

of 1300, which enjoins that in academical processions the Preaching

Friars shall walk first, the White Friars next, and the Black Friars

last. It is scarcely less significant that, although in 1314 the church

of St. Mary was made the one authorised arena of academic ceremonies,

to the exclusion of the religious houses, the four Orders were

represented jointly with the University on the Papal Commission which

delivered this decision. In another statute, of 1326, every bachelor of

arts is required to dispute once and respond once each year before the

Augustins (_apud Augustinenses_), from which it must be inferred that

this Order had already acquired almost a monopoly of grammar-teaching.

But the lay and secular element in the University always rebelled

against the encroachments of the friars, and was destined to prevail.

It is a suggestive fact that Walter de Merton rigorously excluded every

‘religious’ person or member of a monastic Order from the benefits of

his foundation. Soon afterwards the University took alarm. In 1358[8]

we have a trenchant statute against the abduction of boys under

eighteen by the mendicant Orders, which shows how great a jealousy

they had provoked among the secular clergy of the University, for

whose special benefit Merton and other colleges were founded. This

statute expressly recites that noblemen and commoners are afraid to

send their sons to the University, lest they should be seduced by the

mendicant friars into joining their Order before arriving at years of

discretion; and that by these practices the peace of the University is

often disturbed and its numbers diminished. It is therefore enacted

that if any mendicant friar thus seduces or causes to be seduced any

youth under eighteen years of age, or procures his removal from Oxford

with intent that he may be received elsewhere into a religious Order,

no graduate of the cloister or society to which the offender belongs

shall be allowed to deliver or attend lectures in Oxford during the

year next ensuing. Another statute of the same date is apparently aimed

at the attempt of friars to lecture on logic before undergoing the

regular yearly course of disputations. This is immediately followed by

the public recantation extorted from a friar who had affirmed, among

other startling propositions, that tithes belonged more properly to

mendicants than to rectors of churches, and that the University was a

school of heresy. Another friar who had disparaged the School of Arts

was compelled to apologize with equal humility. Still the power of the

monastic Orders continued to be formidable, and at Cambridge they seem

to have ultimately carried their point in obtaining exemption from

academical exercises in Arts for their theological students; while at

Oxford there are many instances of college fellows joining their ranks.

[Sidenote: Intervention of the Pope and the King]

In 1365 the Pope entered the lists against the University on behalf

of the friars, and directed the Archbishop of Canterbury and bishops

to insist upon the Chancellor’s procuring the repeal of the obnoxious

statutes. In the meantime, however, the intervention of the King and

Parliament was invoked by memorials from both the Universities and

the four mendicant Orders. In consequence of this an ordinance was

made, with the assent of Parliament, by which the statutes against the

admission of scholars into these Orders were relaxed, but all bulls and

processes to be procured by the friars against the Universities from

the Court of Rome were prohibited and declared void. Still the feud

continued. One main source of Wyclif’s popularity in the University was

his unsparing denunciation of the Mendicants, and their decline was

among the most permanent results of the movement which he initiated.

But other causes were at work to undermine their influence. The rise

of the colleges was, in fact, the rise of the secular clergy, and in

organising itself more completely, the University naturally outgrew

its dependence on the missionary zeal for education which had been its

life-blood in the thirteenth century.

FOOTNOTES:

[7] See Chapter I. p. 9.

[8] This is the date assigned to the statute by Mr. Anstey in his

_Munimenta Academica_, on the authority of Anthony Wood, supported by

historical probability.

A history of the University of Oxford · 第 5 / 19 章