14.3. The text includes two companies of dragoons that joined Kearny on

the march. On account of the scarcity of grass at Santa Fe and because

he considered infantry the chief reliance, Kearny did not wish so large

a proportion of mounted men. Fischer's company enlisted to serve as

horse. The artillery had twelve brass 6-pounders and four 12-pound

howitzers. Kearny's army, being near states abounding in resources, was

more readily set in motion than Taylor's or Wool's, but on account of

its long march 459 horses, 3658 mules, 14,904 oxen, 1556 wagons, and

516 pack mules were required to transport it, its reinforcements, and

its supplies. (This account is not complete, but on the other hand it

refers not only to Kearny's expedition but to troops that followed him.

Rives's account in U.S. and Mexico, ii, 214-5, is therefore misleading,

and makes the short rations endured on the march seem incredible.) The

Indians drove off many of the cattle, robbed trains and killed not a few

drivers (Sen. 1; 30, 1, p. 545).

14.4. _S. Fe expedition ordered and organized._ S. Louis _Weekly

Reveille_, May 11, 23. Polk, Diary, May 13, 14, 16, 30. =69=Jones to

Kearny, May 13. =63=Marcy to Kearny, May 27. =240=Kennerly, Narrative.

Sen. 7; 30, 1 (Emory). =69=Kearny, orders, June 19; July 31. Richardson,

Journal, 3-6. =61=Kearny to gov. Mo., June 16; to Cummins, June

20. =60=Marcy to gov. Mo., May 13. Wash. _Union_, Sept. 24. _Nat.

Intelligencer_, Oct. 2. _Monitor Repub._, Mar. 27, 1847. Scharf, St.

Louis, i, 369, 372-3. St. Louis _Republican_, May 13, 22, 30; June 26.

Sen. 1; 30, 1, p. 545. _Niles_, July 4, 1846, p. 281; July 3, 1847, p.

279. Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 326. Elliott, Notes, 217, 221. Ruxton, Adventures

(1849), 312-3. St. Louis _New Era_, Aug. 20. Mo. Hist. Soc. Colls.,

ii, no. 4. =212=Hastings, diary. =256=Penn, Jr., [May 23]. Bancroft,

Pac. States, xii, 410, note (names of officers). Hughes, Doniphan's

Expedition, 24-7. Cooke, Conquest, 2.

14.5. The route taken by Kearny was not the shortest but it seemed

the best for his purpose (Cooke, Conquest, 13). Distances from Fort

Leavenworth: to Council Grove, 126 miles; to the Arkansas River, 393; to

Bent's Fort, 564; to S. Fe, 873 (Ho. 1; 30, 2, p. 236).

14.6. _To and at Bent's Fort._ Mexico in 1842, 128. Sen. 7; 30, 1.

=63=Marcy to Howard, May 13, 1846. Ho. 41; 30, 1. =61=Kearny, June 5;

Aug. 1. =61=Kearny, orders, June 27; July 31. =61=Capt. Johnston, diary.

=201=Gibson, diary. Prince, Concise Hist., 164-74, 178. _Niles_, Aug. 1,

1846, p. 343. Cooke, Conquest, 3-4. Elliott, Notes, 222-3. =58=Cooke,

Map of S. Fe Trace. Captain of Vols., Conquest. Ho. 45; 31, 1. Sen.

23; 30, 1. Mo. Hist. Soc. Colls., ii, no. 4. Richardson, Journal.

Sen. Misc. 26; 30, 1, pp. 5-13. Connelley, Doniphan's Exped., 179-81.

=212=Hastings, diary. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 151, 168. Ruxton, Far West,

189. =69=Kearny, July 17. Hughes, Doniphan's Exped., 30-59. =76=Kearny

to Armijo, Aug. 1. =76=Heredia to S. Anna, Dec. 31, 1846. Bent's Fort

lay about fifteen miles above the mouth of Las Animas River (Cooke,

Conquest, 12).

14.7. _Armijo's motives and preparations._ Sen. 7; 30, 1 (Emory).

Gibson, diary, Sept. 5. _Republicano_, Jan. 13; Feb. 5, 1847 (Armijo).

Twitchell, Milit. Occup., 60. Read, Guerra, 219. Prince, Concise Hist.,

179. =52=Alvarez, Sept. 4, 1846. From =76= the following. M. E. to F.

Pino. N. to F. Pino. J. F. to J. E. Ortiz. J. F. Ortiz to P. Armendaris.

M. Ramírez to Señora Casanoba. N. Quintanar to L. Téllez. D. Vigil to

J. F. Zubia. Decision of the _mesa_. Testimony given at the trial of

Magoffin. S. Anna, Dec. 8, 1846. Summary of four packets of letters,

and conclusion of the _mesa_. Armijo, Sept. 8, 1846; Jan. 20; Mar. 30,

1847. Tornel, Mar. 10, 1846. _Id._ to Ugarte, Mar. 10; June 25; July 25.

Segundo cabo, Chihuahua, July 10. Armijo to Ugarte, July 1. To Armijo,

July 25. Comte. gen. Durango, July 16. Ugarte, July 17; Aug. 23. Letter

from El Paso, Aug. 9.

14.8. The regiment under Price numbered at first about 1000, and the

battalion, commanded by Lieut. Col. Willock, about 300. In July a third

force (infantry) was ordered to take the same route but it was found

unnecessary, and the plans were given up (Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 162).

_The second (Price's; Mormons) and third (abortive) expeditions._ Polk,

Diary, May 30; June 2, 3, 5; July 18, 1846; Apr. 28, 1847. =62=Marcy to

gov. Mo., May 11, 1847. =62=Jones to Price, May 18, 22, 1847. =63=Marcy

to gov. Mo., Apr. 28; May 6, 11, 1847. =69=Jones to Scott, Apr. 20,

1847. =61=Doniphan to Marcy, Oct. 20, 1846. =61=Shields, Aug. 9, 1846.

=62=Marcy to gov. Mo., July 18, 1846. Wash. _Union_, Sept. 24, 1846.

Scharf, St. Louis, i, 375-6. _Niles_, July 18, 1846, p. 312. =2=Allred,

recolls. Sen. 439; 29, 1, p. 2. Sen. 1; 29, 2, p. 49. Ho. 60; 30, 1, p.

171. Bancroft, Pac. States, xii, 410, note (names of officers). Cooke,

Conquest, 2. Hughes, Doniphan's Exped., 134, 137-8.

14.9. Kearny's letter to Armijo, found in the Mexican archives, is

stated to have been translated by the American consul from a certified

copy of the original. A little later an American trader, who had married

a Santa Fe woman, was despatched to distribute the proclamation and

sound the people at Taos. A scouting party under Bent went forward to

examine the route.

14.10. Kearny was criticised for undertaking to release the people from

their allegiance to Mexico; but since, as our Supreme Court decided in

the Castine case, the inhabitants of conquered territories pass under

at least a temporary allegiance to the conquering power, they must

necessarily be absolved from their former obligations. See Washington

_Union_, August 21, 1847.

14.11. Kearny returned a conciliatory message by the bearer of Armijo's

letter. See note 13.

14.12. Estimates of the number of the people in arms vary from about

1800 (=76=Armijo) to 4-5000 (Cooke). Armijo's reports minified all his

means of defence. Apparently there were about 3000. So Magoffin stated

on his =76=trial, and this was the conclusion of the war department at

Mexico. Probably Armijo felt surprised and embarrassed by the response

of the people.

14.13. It was charged by Mexicans that Armijo was bought by American

agents. But Kearny had no money to use in this way, and in the absence

of substantial evidence there seems to be no good ground to suppose

that the merchants had a sufficient reason for buying him. Armijo sent

Dr. Henry Connelly back with Cooke to treat in his behalf with Kearny

(Cooke, Conquest, 31, 33), but nothing seems to have been accomplished.

Kearny probably desired (=76=Connelly to Armijo, Aug. 19) that Armijo

should surrender with his troops, and presumably Armijo asked for

impossible concessions. Magoffin went on to Chihuahua, was arrested,

tried, and imprisoned until the end of the war, and later was paid

$30,000 by the U.S. government for his services and losses (Benton,

View, ii, 683). There is little reason to suppose that his services were

of much value.

14.14. The Mexican archives contain many letters from New Mexico bearing

upon Armijo's conduct and motives. Most of the writers called him a

traitor; and a war department board (_mesa_), after reviewing the

evidence, decided that he ought to be tried. But of course this was

the opportunity for his enemies to turn upon him. The popular party

naturally insisted that the people wanted to fight, and were betrayed

by him. But he denied this, demanding why, in that case, they did not

select some other chief, and hold their ground. Armijo hovered about for

a time, pretending to coöperate with Ugarte; but, not being permitted to

remain in Chihuahua, he went south with a train of wagons filled with

American merchandise and guarded by Missourians, and finally, making his

way to the capital under an order to come and answer for his conduct, he

repeatedly demanded to be put on trial.

14.15. The population of Santa Fe was about 3000.

14.16. _Events from Aug. 1 to 18 inclusive._ Mexico in 1842, p. 128.

Sen. 7; 30, 1. Polk, Diary, June 15, 17, 1846. Sen. Misc. 26; 30, 1, pp.

17-20. Sen. 18; 31, 1, p. 237. =61=Kearny, Aug. 1. =61=Capt. Johnston,

diary. =62=Marcy to Kearny, June 18. =201=Gibson, diary. _Republicano_,

Sept. 10, 1846; Jan. 13; Feb. 5, 1847. Bustamante, Nuevo Bernal, ii,

104. Connelley, Doniphan's Exped., 181, 184. _Anzeiger des Westens_,

Aug. 6; Sept. 5, 7, 24, 1846. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 168-70. Wash. _Union_,

Sept. 14; Oct. 2, 27, 1846; July 12, 1847. _Diario_, Sept. 9, 10; Oct.

5. Read, Guerra, 220. Prince, Concise Hist., 179-80. _Niles_, Oct. 10,

pp. 90-2. Robinson, Sketches, 20-1. Elliott, Notes, 225, 231, 234-5,

237, 241. =52=Alvarez, Sept. 4. Sen. 23; 30, 1. Ruxton, Adventures

(London, 1847), 110. Benton, View, ii, 683. Mo. Hist. Soc. Colls.,

ii, no. 4. =212=Hastings, diary. =268=Kearny, letter book. =337=Capt.

Turner, diary. Cutts, Conquest, 44. Cooke, Conquest, 5-43. Richardson,

Journal. Hughes, Doniphan's Exped., 59-87. From =76= the following.

Letters from N. Mex. (undated letters in note 7). Testimony at trial

of Magoffin. S. Anna, Dec. 8. Summary of four packets of letters and

conclusion of the _mesa_. Armijo, Sept. 8. Armijo to Kearny, Aug. 12.

Connelly to Armijo, Aug. 19. Armijo, Jan. 20; Mar. 30, 1847. Re-extracto

from statement of Sambrano. Reyes, Aug. 25, 1846. Ugarte, Aug. 23; Sept.

5. Kearny to Armijo, Aug. 1. Estados of troops in Zac., Dur., Chih., and

N. Mex.

14.17. _Events from Aug. 19 to Sept. 25 inclusive._ =61=Wooster, Sept.

25. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 169-74 (Kearny). Sen. 7; 30, 1. Sen. Misc. 26;

30, 1, pp. 55, etc. =61=Kearny, Aug. 30; Sept. 24. =69=Kearny, orders,

Aug. 27; Sept. 12. =201=Gibson, diary. _Anzeiger des Westens_, Sept.

26; Nov. 16. =243=Kribben, home letter, Aug. 28. Wash. _Union_, Oct.

27. Prince, Concise Hist., 180, 182. _Niles_, Oct. 10, p. 90. Hastings,

diary. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 169-70. Hughes, Doniphan's Exped., 100-19.

=76=Vigil, reply to Kearny, Aug. 19. =76=Letter from El Paso, Aug. 9.

=76=Heredia, Oct. 17. Some of the force did not set out until Sept. 26

(Cooke, Conquest, 71).

XV. CHIHUAHUA

15.1. Willock's battalion was under Price's command. The Mormons were

intended for California. Kearny's order to Doniphan anticipated a

suggestion made independently by Scott and by Benton in November, and

forwarded, with Polk's approval, to Kearny on December 10 by Marcy.

Doniphan was anxious to be ordered to Wool, and his men, reacting from

the atrocious conditions prevailing at Santa Fe--of which quite enough

will be heard in chapter xxxi--were eager to be off.

15.2. Arriving at Santa Fe without provisions, the soldiers soon ate up

what supplies could be obtained there, and as the people were declared

to be American citizens, nothing could be taken without the consent

of the owners. Besides, Kearny had no adequate funds. By a surprising

blunder the contracts for the supplies that followed him called for

delivery, not at Santa Fe, but at Bent's Fort. Doniphan's setting out

for the south was delayed by a lack of provisions. The description of

his men is based upon a large number of documents (particularly the

diaries of Gibson and Hastings and Ruxton's Adventures) which will be

cited when the occupation of New Mexico comes to be considered (chap.

xxxi).

15.3. Ruxton speaks of tents, but perhaps he was thinking of Clark's

men. Doniphan stated that they marched across the Jornada without tents

(St. Louis _Republican_, July 3, 1847).

15.4. December 19 Heredia reported to Santa Anna that there were 108

infantry and 320 cavalry at El Paso. There is no reason to suspect the

honesty of this report, and none of the other troops in the state had

time to reach that town before Christmas. Some ex-soldiers, however, are

said in Apuntes, 141, to have joined the colors, making some 1200 in

all, including militia.

15.5. It is impossible to state positively how many men Ponce de León

had. The American accounts run as high as 1300 (Hughes), but evidently

they were not based on reliable information, and very likely the

writers assumed that all of Vidal's troops were under Ponce. From the

Mexican accounts it would appear that such was not the case. Vidal

would naturally keep men back to act as a reserve, hold what he called

his "line of defence," and guard his person; and this probability is

strengthened by the fact that three of his four guns were not used in

the fight. The figures of several Mexican accounts are about 500. The

reports of the details of the skirmish are equally irreconcilable. El

Brazito (The Little Arm) was the smaller (eastern) of the two channels

into which the river was here divided by an island.

15.6. _Doniphan's operations to Dec. 25 inclusive; Mex. preparations

at the Chihuahua frontier._ =61=Wooster, Sept. 25. =268=Portrait of

Doniphan. =240=Kennerly, narrative. =61=Kearny, special orders 11. Sen.

7; 30, 1. Richardson, Journal. Sen. Misc. 26; 30, 1, p. 61. =61=Kearny,

orders, Sept. 23. =61=Doniphan, Oct. 20. =61=Price, Feb. 26, 1847.

=61=Scott, Nov. 24 and Marcy's endorsement, Dec. 9. Cooke, Conquest, 51.

=201=Gibson, diary. _Republicano_, Jan. 26; Apr. 10, 1847. _Picayune_,

Mar. 6, 18, 1847. Bustamante, Nuevo Bernal, ii, 105. _Anzeiger des

Westens_, Apr. 11, 14; May 17, 18, 1847. =243=Kribben, letters, Oct. 20,

etc., 1846. Wash. =Union=, Mar. 18, 21, 1847. St. Louis _Republican_,

July 3, 1847. _Niles_, Mar. 6, 1847, p. 7; Apr. 3, p. 71; July 3, p.

279. Sen. 1; 30, 1, pp. 496-7 (Don.). Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 171, 1128.

Apuntes, 141-3. Elliott, Notes, 227, 229. Sen. 23; 30, 1, pp. 90-6. Sen.

439; 29, 1, p. 2. (Loss) Ho. 24; 31, 1. Ruxton, Adventures (London,

1847), 171-2, 176, 178, 183. Statement _re_ Doniphan from Hon. Champ

Clark, Jan. 27, 1906. Benton, View, ii, 686-8. Mo. Hist. Soc. Colls.,

ii, no. 4. =212=Hastings, diary. Cooke, Conquest, 39. Hughes, Doniphan's

Exped., 256-67. Connelley, Doniphan's Exped., 589. From =76= the

following. Trias, proclam., Nov. 19, 1846. _Id._, Nov. 23; Dec. 18.

Balmúdez, El Paso, Oct. 28. Vidal, proclam., Dec. 21. _Id._, Dec. 26.

Heredia, Dec. 25. Ponce to Vidal, Dec. 26. Gov. Chih. to prefect El

Paso, Sept. 19.

15.7. October 22 Marcy, learning from Kearny that surplus troops might

be ordered to report to Wool at Chihuahua, directed Taylor to notify

and instruct any such detachment in case he (Taylor) should decide to

have Wool join him (Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 365). It was probably possible to

have a Mexican spy go from Parras to Chihuahua and thence north to meet

Doniphan, but so far as we are aware no attempt to do this was made.

15.8. The insurrection will be described in chap. xxxi.

15.9. During the stay at El Paso some of the traders stole away, went to

Chihuahua, and sold ammunition to the enemy.

15.10. Lieut. Col. Mitchell had been ordered south by Price in December

to open communication with Wool, who was believed to be approaching

Chihuahua, and Mitchell had organized the Rangers as an escort.

Christian Kribben, who commanded one of the two companies, wrote (Nov.

30) that Mitchell selected the best men then at S. Fe. The commander was

named Hudson. (See also Richardson, Journal.) Mitchell nearly reached

El Paso while Doniphan was engaged with the Indians; but, alarmed by

reports of Mexican troops, he returned and joined Doniphan. There was no

engineer in Doniphan's command.

15.11. _Events from Dec. 26 to Feb. 27 inclusive._ Sen. Misc. 26; 30,

1, p. 61. =61=Price, Feb. 26, 1847. =61=Wooster, Mar. 7. Gibson, diary.

_Picayune_, Mar. 18. Bustamante, Nuevo Bernal, ii, 105. Wash. _Union_,

Mar. 18. Richardson, Journal. =228=Hughes to Miller, Jan. 26. _Id._

to war dept., Jan. 25. Sen. 1; 30, 1, pp. 498-9 (Don.), 503 (Gilpin).

Apuntes, 143. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 365, 1128. Elliott, Notes, 245.

Ruxton, Adventures (London, 1847), 156, 158, 168. Kendall, Narrative,

ii, 35. Mo. Hist. Soc. Colls., ii, no. 4. Hastings, diary. Hughes,

Doniphan's Exped., 256, 269, 271-4, 280, 286, 289-95, 301-2. From =76=

the following. García Conde, Apr. 5. Comte. gen. Chih., Oct. 10, 1846.

Heredia, Jan. 9, 1847. _Id._ to S. Anna, Dec. 31, 1846; Jan. 5, 1847.

Gov. Sonora to Bustamante, Feb. 28, 1847. Trias, Feb. 7. The artillery

arrived on Feb. 1, but the baggage and provision train not until Feb. 5.

15.12. After the battle the Mexicans represented their forces as small;

but, as Trias himself wrote on February 20 that he would set out the

next day from Chihuahua City with 2000 troops (it is not probable that

he looked upon the rancheros as troops), and García Conde was then north

of the Sacramento with about 800 cavalry, it seems impossible to reduce

the total given in the text.

15.13. _Mexican preparations to defend Chihuahua; the ground and

the fortifications._ Sen. Misc. 26; 30, 1, p. 53. Gibson, diary.

_Republicano_, Mar. 25; Apr. 10; June 8. _Anzeiger des Westens_, May

17, 18. _Diario_, Nov. 5, 1846. Edwards, Campaign, 127. Sen. 1; 30, 1,

pp. 498-513. Apuntes, 143-6. Ruxton, Adventures (London, 1847), 159.

=47=Conner, May 31, 1846. Memoria de ... Guerra, Mar., 1845, p. 28.

Kendall, Narrative, ii, 63. Hastings, diary. Hughes, Doniphan's Exped.,

303-5. From =76= the following. García Conde, Apr. 5, 1847. Martínez,

Oct. 10, 1846. Reyes, Oct. 9, 1846. J. M. Conde, Feb. 24; Mar. 15, 1847.

S. Anna, Oct. 12; Nov. 11; Dec. 24, 1846; Jan. 4, 1847. Tornel, June

25, 1846. Gov. Durango, July 27; Sept. 3, 1846. Re-extracto of Sambrano

letter. Boletín no. 8, Chih. Reyes to Trias, Oct. 7, 1846. Comte. gen.

Durango, Aug. 22; Sept. 3; Oct. 30, 1846. To Reyes, Aug. 31; Sept. 9,

18, 25, 1846. Reyes, Aug. 25; Sept. 14; Oct. 2, 6, 1846. Memo., Sept 9.

To director gen. of artill., Sept. 18. Patriotic junta, plan, July 27,

1846 (reported upon by generals, Sept. 4). Comte. gen. Chih., [Sept.]

15, 1846. Trias, Sept. 19; Dec. 26, 1846; Feb. 20; Oct. 26, 1847. Gov.

Chih., July 23, 1846. Comte. gen. Zacatecas, July 31. Segundo cabo,

Chih., July 18, res., 21, 25; Aug. 17. Estados of troops in Zac., Dur.,

Chih. and N. Mex. Heredia to S. Anna, Dec. 31, 1846; Jan. 5; Feb. 13,

20, 1847. To Heredia, Mar. 13, 1847. Memo, on defence of Chih. Heredia,

Oct. 10; Nov. 2; Dec. 7, 1846; Jan. 19, 26, 30; Feb. 20; Mar. 2, 22,

1847. Estado of Dur. troops sent to Chih., dated Feb. 20, 1847. To

comte. gen. Dur., Sept. 9, 1846. And many others.

15.14. A letter of May 18, 1847, from Chihuahua said that in the opinion

of sensible persons commercial interest in the caravan had much to do

with Doniphan's victories, and that certain extraordinary events could

be explained in no other way (_Republicano_, June 8). =76=Heredia

suspected that Chihuahua merchants were secretly working to bring about

the arrival of the caravan.

15.15. Doniphan might have crossed the cordillera bounding the eastern

side of the valley and turned the Mexican position entirely, wrote

=76=García Conde; but he did not say that the wagons could have gone

that way. If they could not, the plan was impracticable.

15.16. Doniphan said later: "There was no particular generalship at

the battle. You were marched within the proper distance, when you were

turned loose. The enemy first recoiled, then gave way, then fled." To

a great extent this was true. Doniphan knew that he was not a general,

and did not try to play the part. For a time at least he merely watched

and whittled (Edwards, Campaign, 112). Affairs were mostly in the hands

of his subordinates. But he gave some directions. Lieut. Wooster of the

Fourth Artillery, who had arrived at Santa Fe on August 28, was on the

ground, and according to his own report was mainly responsible for the

conduct of the battle.

15.17. _Events of Feb. 28._ Sen. 1; 30, 1, pp. 498 (Doniphan),

502 (Mitchell), 503 (Gilpin), 508 (Clark). (Loss) Ho. 24; 31, 1.

=201=Gibson, diary. =212=Hastings, diary. _American Eagle_, V. Cruz, May

26. Richardson, Journal, 61-4. Polk, Diary, May 4. =188=Edwards, diary.

Sen. Misc. 26; 30, 1, p. 53. =61=Wooster, Mar. 7. _Republicano_, Mar.

25; Apr. 10. México á través, iv, 644. _Anzeiger des Westens_, May 18

(Kribben). Wash. _Union_, July 12. _Diario_, Mar. 17; Apr. 8. Edwards,

Campaign, 111-2, 117. _Niles_, July 3, 1847, p. 279. Robinson, Sketches,

57-8. Apuntes, 146-9. Elliott, Notes, 245. =13=Bankhead, no. 29, 1847.

Captain of Vols., Conquest, 38. Ruxton, Adventures (1847), 159. Mo.

Hist. Soc. Colls., ii, no. 4. Benton, View, ii, 686. Cooke, Conquest,

89. =240=Kennerly, narrative. Hughes, Doniphan's Exped., 306-13.

Connelley, Doniphan's Exped., 418, 590. From =76= the following. García

Conde, Apr. 5. J. M. Conde, Mar. 15. Yáñez, Mar. 23. To Heredia, Mar.

2, 13. Heredia, Mar. 2; Apr. 1. Ugarte, Mar. 10. It is hardly necessary

to point out that howitzers and cavalry should not ordinarily be used

in storming entrenched positions. Ibarra's list of officers killed

during the war (p. 8) mentions but one as falling here. This fact seems

to suggest the true character of the battle. Drawing the fire of the

Mexican fortifications by sweeping to the left prepared the way for our

decisive charge.

15.18. Trias made active efforts but in vain. Heredia had only 200 men

on April 10; and Ugarte on April 15 merely expected to have two small

parties afoot before long. Arlégui, comandante general of Durango,

was anxious to protect his own state by recovering Chihuahua, but the

governor showed no interest in that project.

15.19. Sen. Misc. 26; 30, 1, pp. 61-2. Frost, Taylor, 304. =61=Wooster,

Mar. 7. Gibson, diary. _Republicano_, Apr. 10; June 8. Wash. _Union_,

July 12. Sen. 1; 30, 1, pp. 501 (Doniphan); 503 (Mitchell). Apuntes,

149. Robinson, Sketches, 62. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 1088 (Mora); 1128

(Doniphan). Rondé, Voyage, 136. Hastings, diary. Hughes, Doniphan's

Exped., 316, 327, 335. Richardson, Journal. From =76= the following.

Ugarte, Mar. 15; Apr. 8, 15. To comtes. gen. in Jalisco, Zacat., Guanaj.

and Dur., Mar. 13. To Filisola, Apr. 1, 30. Gov. Dur. to comte. gen.,

Mar. 7; Apr. 3. Arlégui, Mar. 31. _Id._, proclam., Apr. 11. Heredia,

Mar. 2, 18; Apr. 8. Trias, May 26. Olivares and Maceyra to Doniphan,

Mar. 5. Gov. Zacatecas, Mar. 18. The news that Mexican forces were

coming was not without foundation. Gen. Filisola, a veteran officer, had

now been given Heredia's place, the comandantes general of three states

had been ordered to the north, and the governor of Durango was expecting

1000 men.

15.20. About sixty-five Comanches had raided Parras just before the

Americans arrived there, killing eight or ten persons. As the people of

the town had been friendly to Wool, Captain Reid with about thirty-five

men pursued the Indians, and without losing a life killed seventeen,

wounded at least twenty-five, and recaptured nineteen boys and girls

besides hundreds of horses and mules. Doniphan's men were reviewed by

Wool at Buena Vista.

15.21. _The return home._ Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 1127, 1131, 1136, 1143,

1170 (Taylor); 1128 (Doniphan); 1144 (Reid). Richardson, Journal.

Hughes, Doniphan's Exped., 339-51, 359, 363-5, etc. Sen. Misc. 26;

30, 1, pp. 62-82. =61=Wooster, Mar. 7. =65=Wool, gen. orders 293.

Cutts, Conquest, 89. _Republicano_, June 8. Richardson, Journal.

_Independiente_, May 29. Wash. _Union_, July 12. Scharf, St. Louis, i,

379. Connelley, Doniphan's Exped., 591. Sen. 1; 30, 1, p. 502. Captain

of Vols., Conquest, 37, 39. Cooke, Conquest, 90, note. =148=Chamberlain,

recolls. =65=Taylor, gen. orders 59. S. Anna, Apelación, app.,

15-7. Connelley, Doniphan's Exped., 596. Mo. Hist. Soc. Colls., ii,

no. 4. Hastings, diary. _Niles_, July 3, 1847, p. 279; July 17, p.

316; Aug. 14, p. 372. Robinson, Sketches, 64-71. =76=Ugarte, May 3.

=76=Relaciones, May 20. =76=Arlégui, May 7, 14. =76=Aguirre, May 14.

=76=Jefe político, Mapimi, May 10. The distance from Chihuahua to

Saltillo was called 675 miles. Doniphan resumed the practice of law,

managed his fine farm, and served in the Missouri senate. When the Civil

War broke out, he supported the Union; but apparently he felt too much

tenderness for his neighbors to take up arms.

XVI. THE CALIFORNIA QUESTION

16.1. In 1845 there entered at Monterey, the only port of entry,

twenty-seven American vessels (9435 tons), eighteen Mexican (2620), four

British (966), three French (756) and three German (525).

16.2. Mexico tried to keep the emigrants out with proclamations and

orders to the California authorities, but the Americans appealed

successfully to the treaty of amity and commerce and (it may be

presumed) to the self-interest of local authorities.

16.3. The Mexican government was urged to buy New Helvetia, and

negotiations began; but it was said that the Americans in the valley

declared they would not permit Sutter to sell, and it seemed doubtful

whether Mexico could hold the place even if she purchased it.

The War with Mexico, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 55 / 63 段