LORD HUGH CECIL.]

Lord HUGH CECIL, like _Harlequin_, smote everyone impartially, one

of his most telling strokes being the remark that the PRIME MINISTER

could not distinguish between the art of winning an election and the

art of governing a country; but otherwise his performance was about on

a par with that of Mr. JACK JONES, who spoke against the Amendment

and voted for it. Mr. BONAR LAW'S declaration that the Bill, however

unacceptable to Ireland at the moment, furnished the only hope of

ultimate settlement, coupled with the Ulster leader's promise that,

much as he loathed the idea of a separate Parliament, he would work

it for all he was worth, carried the day. Mr. ASQUITH'S Amendment was

knocked out by 259 to 55.

In subsequent Amendments other Members attempted to emphasise the idea

of ultimate union by calling the statutory bodies "Councils" instead

of "Parliaments," and by setting up a single Senate to control them

both. But they did not meet with acceptance. Captain ELLIOTT thought

the first as absurd as the idea that you could make two dogs agree

by chaining them together, and Mr. LONG dismissed the second with the

remark (which shows how rapidly his political education has advanced

since the Parliament Act) that he was in great doubt as to whether a

Second Chamber was in itself a protection for minorities.

[Illustration: A PROTESTING CONVERT.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, May 19, 1920 · 第 29 / 42 题