With great respect, I have the honor to be, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.

* * * * *

DAVID HARTLEY TO B. FRANKLIN.

London, March 2d, 1784.

My Dear Friend,

Will you be so good as to transmit the enclosed to Mr Jay? I am sorry

that we are going to lose him from this side of the Atlantic. If your

American ratification should arrive speedily, I might hope to have the

pleasure of seeing him again before his departure. As soon as I hear

from you of the arrival of your ratification I will immediately apply

for the despatch of the British ratification. I wish very much to have

the pleasure of conversing with you again. In hopes that that time may

come soon, I have nothing further to say at present. Believe me always

to be, what you have always known me to have been, a friend of general

philanthropy, and particularly your ever, most affectionate

D. HARTLEY.

* * * * *

TO CHARLES THOMPSON.

Passy, March 9th, 1784.

Sir,

I received a few days since a letter from Annapolis, dated June the

5th, in your hand writing, but not signed, acquainting the

Commissioners with the causes of delay in sending the ratification of

the Definitive Treaty. The term was expired before that letter came to

hand, but I hope no difficulty will arise from a failure in a point

not essential, and which was occasioned by accidents. I have just

received from Mr Hartley a letter on the subject, of which I enclose a

copy.

We have had a terrible winter, too, here, such as the oldest men do

not remember, and indeed it has been very severe all over Europe.

I have exchanged ratifications with the Ambassador of Sweden, and

enclose a copy of that I received from him.

Mr Jay is lately returned from England. Mr Laurens is still there, but

proposes departing for America next month, as does also Mr Jay, with

his family. Mr Adams is in Holland, where he has been detained by

business and bad weather. These absences have occasioned some delays

in our business, but not of much importance.

The war long expected between the Turks and Russians is prevented by a

treaty, and it is thought an accommodation will likewise take place

between them and the Emperor. Everything here continues friendly and

favorable to the United States. I am pestered continually with numbers

of letters from people in different parts of Europe, who would go to

settle in America, but who manifest very extravagant expectations,

such as I can by no means encourage, and who appear otherwise to be

very improper persons. To save myself trouble, I have just printed

some copies of the enclosed little piece, which I purpose to send

hereafter in answer to such letters.

Be pleased to present my dutiful respects to Congress, and believe me

to be, with sincere esteem, dear Sir, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.

* * * * *

TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.

Passy, May 12th, 1784.

Sir,

In my last I acquainted your Excellency, that Mr Hartley was soon

expected here to exchange ratifications of the Definitive Treaty. He

is now arrived, and proposes to make the exchange this afternoon. I

shall then be enabled to send a copy. Enclosed is the new British

Proclamation respecting our trade with their Colonies. It is said to

be a temporary provision, till Parliament can assemble and make some

proper regulating law, or till a commercial treaty shall be framed and

agreed to. Mr Hartley expects instructions for planning with us such a

treaty. The Ministry are supposed to have been too busy with the new

elections, when he left London, to think of those matters.

This Court has not completed its intended new system for the trade of

their Colonies, so that I cannot yet give a certain account of the

advantages that will in fine be allowed us. At present it is said we

are to have two free ports, Tobago and the Mole, and that we may carry

lumber and all sorts of provisions to the rest, except flour, which is

reserved in favor of Bordeaux, and that we shall be permitted to

export coffee, rum, molasses, and some sugar, for our own

consumption.

We have had under consideration a commercial treaty proposed to us by

the King of Prussia, and have sent it back with our remarks to Mr

Adams, who will I suppose transmit it immediately to Congress. Those

planned with Denmark and Portugal wait its determination,

Be pleased to present my dutiful respects to the Congress, and believe

me to be, with sincere and great esteem, Sir, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.

_May 13th._ I now enclose a copy of the ratification of the Definitive

Treaty, on the part of his Britannic Majesty.

* * * * *

DAVID HARTLEY TO B. FRANKLIN.

Paris, June 1st, 1784.

Sir,

I have the honor to inform you, that I have transmitted to London the

ratification on the part of Congress of the Definitive Treaty of

peace, between Great Britain and the United States of America, and I

am ordered to represent to you, that a want of form appears in the

first paragraph of that instrument, wherein the United States are

mentioned before his Majesty, contrary to the established custom in

every treaty in which a crowned head and a republic are parties. It is

likewise to be observed, that the term definitive _articles_ is used

instead of definitive _treaty_, and the conclusion appears likewise

deficient, as it is neither signed by the President, nor is it dated,

and consequently, is wanting in some of the most essential points of

form necessary towards authenticating the validity of the instrument.

I am ordered to propose to you, Sir, that these defects in the

ratification should be corrected, which might very easily be done,

either by signing a declaration in the name of Congress for preventing

the particular mode of expression, so far as it relates to precedency

in the first paragraph, being considered as a precedent to be adopted

on any future occasion, or else by having a new copy made out in

America, in which these mistakes should be corrected, and which might

be done without any prejudice arising to either of the parties from

the delay.

I am, Sir, with great respect and consideration, &c.

DAVID HARTLEY.

* * * * *

TO DAVID HARTLEY.

Passy, June 2d, 1784.

Sir,

I have considered the observations you did me the honor of

communicating to me, concerning certain inaccuracies of expression,

and supposed defects of formality, in the instrument of ratification,

some of which are said to be of such a nature as to affect the

validity of the instrument.

The first is, "that the United States are named before his Majesty,

contrary to the established custom observed in every treaty in which a

crowned head and a republic are the contracting parties." With respect

to this, it seems to me we should distinguish between that act in

which both join, to wit, the treaty, and that which is the act of each

separately, the ratification. It is necessary, that all the modes of

expression in the joint act should be agreed to by both parties,

though in their separate acts each party is master of, and alone

unaccountable for its own mode. And, on inspecting the treaty, it will

be found that his Majesty is always regularly named before the United

States. Thus, "the established custom _in treaties_ between crowned

heads and republics," contended for on your part, is strictly

observed; and the ratification following the treaty contains these

words. "Now know ye, that we, the United States in Congress assembled,

having seen and considered the definitive articles aforesaid, have

_approved_, _ratified_, and _confirmed_, and by these presents do

_approve_, _ratify_, and _confirm_ the said articles, AND EVERY PART

AND CLAUSE THEREOF," &c. Hereby all those articles, parts, and

clauses, wherein the King is named before the United States, are

_approved_, _ratified_, and _confirmed_, and this solemnly under the

signature of the President of Congress, with the public seal affixed

by their order, and countersigned by their Secretary.

No declaration on the subject more determinate or more authentic can

possibly be made or given, which, when considered, may probably induce

his Majesty's Ministers to waive the proposition of our signing a

similar declaration, or of sending back the ratification to be

corrected in this point, neither appearing to be really necessary. I

will, however, if it be still desired, transmit to Congress the

observation, and the difficulty occasioned by it, and request their

orders upon it. In the meantime I may venture to say, that I am

confident there was no intention of affronting his Majesty by their

order of nomination, but that it resulted merely from that sort of

complaisance, which every nation seems to have for itself, and of that

respect for its own government, customarily so expressed in its own

acts, of which the English among the rest afford an instance, when in

the title of the King they always name Great Britain before France.

The second objection is, "that the term definitive _articles_ is used

instead of definitive _treaty_" If the words _definitive treaty_ had

been used in the ratification instead of _definitive articles_, it

might have been more correct, though the difference seems not great

nor of much importance, as in the treaty itself it is called the

present _Definitive Treaty_.

The other objections are, "that the conclusion likewise appears

deficient, as if is neither signed by the President, nor is it dated,

and consequently is wanting in some of the most essential points of

form necessary towards authenticating the validity of the instrument."

The situation of seals and signatures, in public instruments, differs

in different countries, though all equally valid; for when all the

parts of an instrument are connected by a ribband, whose ends are

secured under the impression of the seal, the signature and seal

wherever placed are understood as relating to and authenticating the

whole. Our usage is, to place them both together in the broad margin

near the beginning of the piece, and so they stand in the present

ratification, the concluding words of which declare the intention of

such signing and sealing to be giving authenticity to the whole

instrument, viz. "_In testimony_ whereof, We have _caused_ the seal of

the United States to be hereunto affixed; Witness his Excellency

Thomas Mifflin, Esquire, President;" and the date supposed to be

omitted, perhaps from its not appearing in figures, is nevertheless to

be found written in words at length, viz. "this fourteenth day of

January, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred

eightyfour," which made the figures unnecessary.

With great esteem and respect, I have the honor to be, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.

* * * * *

TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.

Passy, June 16th, 1784.

Sir,

My letter by Mr Jay acquainted your Excellency, that the ratifications

of the Definitive Treaty were exchanged. A copy of the British part

was also sent by him.

Mr Hartley remained here expecting instructions to treat with us on

the subject of commerce. The bustle attending a new election and

meeting of Parliament, he imagined might occasion the long delay of

those instructions. He now thinks that the affair of the American

trade, being under the consideration of Parliament, it is probable no

treaty will be proposed till the result is known. Mr Jay, who sailed

for America the first instant from Dover, and who saw there several of

our friends from London before his departure, and Mr Laurens who left

London the 6th to go on in the Falmouth packet, will be able to give

you more perfect informations than I can, of what may be expected as

the determination of the British government respecting our intercourse

with their Islands; and, therefore, I omit my conjectures, only

mentioning, that from various circumstances there seems to be some

lurking remains of ill humor there, and of resentment against us,

which only wants a favorable opportunity to manifest itself.

This makes it more necessary for us to be upon our guard, and prepared

for events, that a change in the affairs of Europe may produce; its

tranquillity depending, perhaps, on the life of one man, and it being

impossible to foresee in what situation a new arrangement of its

various interests may place us. Ours will be respected in proportion

to the apparent solidity of our government, the support of our credit,

the maintenance of a good understanding with our friends, and our

readiness for defence. All which I persuade myself will be taken care

of.

Enclosed I send a copy of a letter from Mr Hartley to me, respecting

some supposed defects in the ratification, together with my answer,

which he has transmitted to London. The objections appeared to me

trivial and absurd, but I thought it prudent to treat them with as

much decency as I could, lest the ill temper should be augmented,

which might be particularly inconvenient, while the commerce was under

consideration. There has not yet been time for Mr Hartley to hear

whether my answer has been satisfactory, or whether the Ministers will

still insist on my sending for an amended copy from America, as they

proposed.

I do not perceive the least diminution in the good disposition of this

Court towards us, and I hope care will be taken to preserve it.

The Marquis de Lafayette, who will have the honor of delivering this

to you, has, ever since his arrival in Europe, been very industrious

in his endeavors to serve us and promote our interests, and has been

of great use on several occasions. I should wish the Congress might

think fit to express in some proper manner their sense of his merit.

My malady prevents my going to Versailles, as I cannot bear a carriage

upon pavement, but my grandson goes regularly on Court days to supply

my place, and is well received there. The last letters I have had the

honor of receiving from you, are of the 14th of January.

With great respect, I am, Sir, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.

* * * * *

CONSULAR CONVENTION.

Convention between His Most Christian Majesty and the Thirteen United

States of North America, for the purpose of determining and fixing the

functions and prerogatives of their respective consuls, vice consuls,

agents, and commissaries.

His Majesty, The Most Christian King, and the Thirteen United States

of North America, having, by the 29th article of the Treaty of Amity

and Commerce concluded between them, mutually granted the liberty of

having in their respective States and ports, consuls, vice consuls,

agents, and commissaries, and being willing in consequence thereof, to

determine and fix in a reciprocal and permanent manner the functions

and prerogatives of the said consuls, vice consuls, agents, and

commissaries, His Most Christian Majesty has nominated the Sieur

Charles Gravier, Count of Vergennes, Baron of Welfording, &c.

Counsellor of the King in all his Councils, Commander of his Orders,

Head of the Royal Council of Finances, Counsellor of the State of the

Sword, Minister and Secretary of State, and of his Commands and

Finances; and the United States, Mr Benjamin Franklin, their Minister

Plenipotentiary to His Most Christian Majesty, who, after having

communicated to each other their respective full powers, agreed upon

what follows.

ARTICLE I.

The consuls and vice consuls, nominated by His Most Christian Majesty

and the United States, shall be bound to present their commissions on

their arrival in their respective States, according to the form which

shall be there established. There shall be delivered to them without

any charges the _Exequatur_ necessary for the exercise of their

functions; and, on the exhibition they shall make of the said

Exequatur, the governors, commanders, heads of justice, public bodies,

tribunals, and other officers, having authority in the ports and

places of their consulates, shall cause them to enjoy, as soon as

possible, and without difficulty, the pre-eminences, authority, and

privileges, reciprocally granted, without exacting from said consuls

and vice consuls, any duty under any pretext whatever.

ARTICLE II.

The respective consuls shall have power to establish vice consuls in

the different ports and places of their departments, where necessity

shall require. There shall be delivered to them likewise the Exequatur

necessary to the exercise of their functions, in the form pointed out

in the preceding article, and on the exhibition, which they shall make

of the said Exequatur, they shall be admitted and acknowledged in the

terms and according to the powers, authority, and privileges,

stipulated by the 1st, 4th and 5th articles of the present convention.

ARTICLE III.

The respective consuls and vice consuls may establish agents in the

different ports and places of their departments, where necessity shall

require; these agents may be chosen among the merchants, either

national or foreign, and furnished with a commission from one of the

said consuls. It shall be their business, respectively, to render to

their respective merchants, navigators, and vessels, all possible

service, and to inform the nearest consul or vice consul of the wants

of the said merchants, navigators, and vessels, without the said

agents otherwise participating in the immunities, rights, and

privileges, attributed to the consuls and vice consuls, and without

power to exact from the said merchants any duty or emolument whatever,

under any pretext whatever.

ARTICLE IV.

The consuls and vice consuls, officers of the consulate, and in

general, all persons attached to the consular functions, shall enjoy

respectively a full and entire immunity for their persons, their

papers, and their houses. The list of the said persons shall be

approved and inspected by the executive power of the place of their

residence.

They shall be exempt from all personal service and public offices,

from soldier's billets, militia, watch guard, guardianship and

trusteeship, as well as from all duties, taxes, impositions, and

charges whatsoever, except the real estates of which they may be

proprietors, which shall be subject to the taxes imposed on the

estates of all other individuals.

They shall place over the outward door of their house the arms of

their sovereign, without this mark of distinction giving to the said

house the right of asylum for any malefactor or criminal, so that in

case it should happen that any malefactor or criminal take refuge

there, he shall be instantly delivered up on the first requisition,

and without difficulty.

ARTICLE V.

Generally, in all cases whatever, which concern the police or

administration of justice, where it may be necessary to have a

juridical declaration from the said consuls and vice consuls

respectively, the governors, commandants, chief justice, public

bodies, tribunals, or other officers whatever of their respective

residence there, having authority, shall be bound to inform them of

it, by writing to them, or sending to them a military or civil officer

to let them know, either the object which is proposed, or the

necessity there is for going to them to demand from them this

declaration, and the said consuls end vice consuls shall be bound on

their part to comply faithfully with what shall be desired of them on

these occasions.

ARTICLE VI.

The consuls and vice consuls respectively may establish a chancery,

where shall be deposited the consular acts and deliberations, all

effects left by deceased persons, or saved from shipwreck, as well as

testaments, obligations, contracts, and, in general, all the acts and

proceedings done between, or by, persons of their nations.

They may, in consequence, appoint for the _business_ of the said

chancery capable persons, receive them, administer an oath to them,

give to them the keeping of the seal, and the right of seal,

commissions, judgments, and other acts of the consulate, as well as

there to discharge the functions of notaries and registers.

ARTICLE VII.

The consuls and vice consuls respectively shall have the exclusive

right of receiving in their chancery, or on board of vessels, the

declarations and all other acts, which the captains, masters, seamen,

passengers, and merchants of their nation would make there, even their

testaments and other dispositions of last will, and the copies of the

said acts duly authenticated by the said consuls, or vice consuls, and

under the seal of their consulate shall receive faith in law in all

the tribunals of France and the United States.

They shall have also, and exclusively, the right to inventory,

liquidate, and proceed to the sale of the moveable effects of the

estates left by subjects of their nation who shall die within the

extent of the consulate. They shall proceed therein with the

assistance of two merchants of their said nation, of their own

choosing, and shall deposit in their chancery the effects and papers

of the said estates, and no officer, military or civil, or of the

police of the country, shall trouble them or interfere therein, in any

manner whatsoever; but the said consuls and vice consuls shall not

deliver up the same and their product to the lawful heirs, or _their

attornies_, until they shall have discharged all the debts, which the

deceased shall have contracted in the country, by judgment, by acts,

or by notes, the writing and signing of which shall be known and

certified by two principal merchants of the nation of the said

deceased, and in all other cases the payment of debts cannot be

ordered but on the creditor's giving sufficient and local security to

repay the sums unduly received, principal, interest, and costs, which

securities, however, shall remain duly discharged after a year in time

of peace, and two years in time of war, if the demand in discharge

cannot be formed before these delays, against the heirs who shall

present themselves.

ARTICLE VIII.

The respective consuls and vice consuls shall receive the

declarations, "_consulats_," and other consular acts from all captains

and masters of their respective nations on account of average losses

sustained at sea by leakage, or throwing merchandises overboard, and

these captains and masters shall leave in the chancery of the said

consuls and vice consuls, the "consulats," and other consular acts,

which they may have had made in other ports on account of the

accidents, that may have happened to them on their voyage. If a

subject of His Most Christian Majesty and a citizen of the United

States are interested in the said cargo, the average shall be fixed by

the tribunals of the country, and not by the consuls or vice consuls;

and the tribunals shall admit the acts and declarations; if any should

have been passed before the said consuls and vice consuls; but when

only the subjects of their own nation, or foreigners, shall be

interested, the respective consuls or vice consuls, and in case of

their absence or distance, their agents furnished with their

commission, shall officially nominate skilful persons of their said

nation to regulate the damages and averages.

ARTICLE IX.

In case, by storms or other accidents, French ships or vessels shall

run ashore on the coasts of the United States, or the ships and

vessels of the United States shall run ashore on the coasts of France,

the consul or vice consul nearest to the place of shipwreck shall do

whatever he may judge proper, as well for the purpose of saving the

said ship or vessel, its cargo and appurtenances, as for the storing

and security of the effects and merchandise saved. He may take an

inventory, without any officers military, of the custom house,

justices, or the police of the country interfering, otherwise than to

facilitate to the consuls, vice consuls, captain and crew of the

vessel shipwrecked, or run ashore, all the assistance and favor, which

they shall ask, either for the celerity and security of the salvage

and effects saved, or to prevent all disturbances.

The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 04 · 第 14 / 34 段