On this attack Kellermann's artillery moved forward and took up its

position in front of the infantry. More than twenty thousand balls were

exchanged during two hours from one hundred twenty guns, which thundered

from the sides of the opposite hills, as though they strove to batter a

breach in the mountains. The Prussians, more exposed than the French,

suffered more severely, and their fire began to slacken. Kellermann, who

narrowly watched the enemy's movements, fancied he saw some confusion in

their ranks, and charged at the head of a column to carry the guns. A

Prussian battery, masked by an inequality in the ground, suddenly opened

its fire on them, and Kellermann's horse, struck by a ball in the chest,

fell on its rider. His aide-de-camp, Lieutenant-Colonel Lormier, was

killed, and the head of the column, exposed on three sides to a

withering fire, fell back in disorder, while Kellermann, disengaged and

carried off by his troops, sought for a fresh charger. The Prussians,

witnessing his fall and the retreat of his column, redoubled their fire,

and a well-directed volley of shells silenced the French artillery.

The Duc de Chartres, who for three hours had supported the fire of the

Prussians at the decisive post of Valmy, without drawing a trigger, saw

the danger of his general. He hastened to the second line, put himself

at the head of the reserve of artillery, advanced to the plateau by the

mill, covered the disorder of the centre, rallied the flying caissons,

supported the fire, and checked the enemy's onset.

The Duke of Brunswick would not give the French time to strengthen their

position, but formed three formidable columns of attack, supported by

two wings of cavalry. These columns advanced in spite of the fire of the

French batteries, and were about to crush beneath their masses the

division of the Duc de Chartres, who at the mill of Valmy awaited the

onset. Kellermann, who had renewed the line, formed his army into

columns by battalions, sprang from his horse, and casting the bridle to

his orderly, bade him lead it behind the ranks, showing the soldiers

that he was resolved to conquer or die. "Comrades," cried Kellermann, in

a voice of thunder, "the moment of victory is at hand. Let us suffer the

enemy to advance, and then charge with the bayonet." Then waving his hat

on the top of his sword, "_Vive la nation!_" cried he more

enthusiastically than before; "let us conquer for her."

This cry of the general, repeated by the nearest battalions, and taken

up successively by the rest, created an immense clamor like the country

herself encouraging her defenders. This shout of the whole army,

resounding from one hill to another, and heard above the cannon's roar,

reassured the troops, and made the Duke of Brunswick pause, for such

hearts promised equally terrible hands. Kellermann still advanced at the

head of his column. The Duc de Chartres, his sword in one hand and a

tricolored flag in the other, followed the horse artillery with the

cavalry. The Duke of Brunswick, with the quick eye of a veteran soldier,

and that economy of human life that characterizes an able general, saw

that this attack would fail when opposed to such enthusiasm; and he

re-formed the head of his columns, sounded the retreat, and slowly

retired to his positions unpursued.

The fire ceased on both sides and the battle was as it were suspended

until four in the evening, when the King of Prussia, indignant at the

hesitation of his army, formed in person, and with the flower of his

infantry and cavalry, three formidable columns of attack; then riding

down the line, he bitterly reproached them with suffering the standard

of the monarch to be thus humiliated. At the voice of their sovereign

the troops marched to the conflict, and the King, surrounded by the Duke

of Brunswick and his principal officers, marched in the first rank,

exposed to the fire of the French, which mowed down his staff around

him. Intrepid as the blood of Frederick, he commanded as a king jealous

of the honor of his nation, and exposed himself like a soldier who holds

his life but lightly compared to victory. All was in vain; the Prussian

columns, assailed by the fire of twenty-four pieces of cannon, in

position on the heights of Valmy, retreated at nightfall, leaving behind

them eight hundred dead. Not to have been defeated was to the French

army a victory. Kellermann felt this so fully that he assumed the name

of Valmy in after-years,[39] and in his will bequeathed his heart to the

village of that name, in order that it might repose on the theatre of

his greatest renown, and sleep amid the companions of his first field.

While the French army fought and triumphed at Valmy, the Convention

decreed the Republic at Paris.

Dumouriez returned to his camp amid the roar of Kellermann's cannon; but

while he congratulated himself on the success of a day that strengthened

the patriotic feelings of the army, and that rendered the first attack

on the country fatal to her enemies, he was too clear-sighted not to

perceive the faults of Kellermann and the temerity of his position. The

Duke of Brunswick was on the morrow the same as he was the previous

evening, and had, moreover, extended his right wing beyond Gizaucourt

and cut off the route to Chalons.

Early on the morning of the 21st Dumouriez went to the camp of his

colleague, and ordered him to pass the river Auve, and fall back on the

camp of Dampierre, in the position previously assigned him. This

position, less brilliant, yet more secure, strengthened and united the

French army. Kellermann felt this and obeyed without a murmur.

The Prussians had lost so much time that they had no longer any to

spare. The rainy season had already affected them, and the winter would

be sufficient in itself to force them to retreat. The Duke of Brunswick

lost ten days in observing the French army; and the rain and fever

season surprised him, while yet undecided. The rains cut up the roads

from Argonne, by which his convoys arrived from Verdun, while his

soldiers, destitute of shelter and provisions, wandered about in the

fields, the orchards and vineyards, plucking the unripe grapes which

these inhabitants of the North tasted for the first time. Their

stomachs, already weakened by bad living, were soon disordered, and they

were attacked by that dysentery which is so fatal to the soldier; the

contagion spread rapidly through the camp, and thinned the corps.

The situation of Dumouriez did not appear, however, less perilous to

those who were not in the secret of his intentions. Hemmed in on the one

side of Les Eveches by the Prince de Hohenlohe; on the Paris side by the

King of Prussia, the Prussians were within six leagues of Chalons, the

emigres still nearer. The Uhlans, the light cavalry of the Prussians,

pillaged at the gates of Rheims, and between Chalons and the capital

there was not a position or an army. Paris dreaded to find itself thus

exposed. Kellermann, a brave, but susceptible general, shaken by the

opinion in Paris, threatened to quit the camp and abandon his colleague

to his fate. Dumouriez, employing alternately the ascendency of his rank

and the seduction of his genius, passed, in order to detain him, from

menace to entreaty, and thus gained day by day his victory of patience.

Sometimes he threatened to deprive of their uniform and arms those who

complained of the want of provisions, and drive them from the camp as

cowards who were unworthy to suffer privations for their country. Eight

battalions of federes, recently arrived from the camp at Chalons, and

intoxicated with massacre and sedition, were those who most threatened

the subordination of the camp, saying openly that the ancient officers

were traitors, and that it was necessary to purge the army, as they had

Paris, of its aristocrats. Dumouriez posted these battalions apart from

the others, placed a strong force of cavalry behind them, and two pieces

of cannon on their flank. Then, affecting to review them, he halted at

the head of the line, surrounded by all his staff and an escort of one

hundred hussars. "Fellows," said he--"for I will not call you either

citizens or soldiers--you see before you this artillery, behind you this

cavalry; you are stained with crimes, and I do not tolerate here

assassins or executioners. I know that there are scoundrels among you

charged to excite you to crime. Drive them from among you, or denounce

them to me, for I shall hold you responsible for their conduct." The

battalions trembled and at once assumed the same spirit that pervaded

the army.

The ancient feelings of honor were associated in the camps with

patriotism, and Dumouriez encouraged it among his troops. Every day he

received from Paris threats of dismissal, to which he replied in terms

of defiance. "I will conceal my dismissal," he wrote, "until the day

when I behold the flight of the enemy: I will then show it to my

soldiers, and return to Paris, to suffer the punishment my country

inflicts on me for having saved her in spite of herself."

Three commissioners of the Convention, Sillery, Carra, and Prieur,

arrived at the camp on the 24th, to proclaim the Republic, and Dumouriez

did not hesitate. Although a royalist, he yet felt that at present it

was not a question of government, but of the safety of the country; and

besides, his ambition was vast as his genius, vague as the future. A

republic agitated at home, threatened from abroad, could not but be

favorable to an ambitious soldier at the head of an army who adored him;

for when royalty was abolished, there was no one of higher rank in the

nation than its generalissimo. The commissioners had also instructions

to order the retreat of the army behind the Marne. Dumouriez asked and

obtained from them six days' delay; on the seventh, at sunrise, the

French videttes beheld the heights of La Lune deserted, and the columns

of the Duke of Brunswick slowly defiling between the hills of Champagne,

and taking the direction of Grandpre. Fortune had justified

perseverance, and genius had baffled numbers. Dumouriez was triumphant,

and France was saved.

At this intelligence, one general shout of "Vive la nation!" burst from

the French army. The commissioners, the generals Beurnonville, Miranda,

even Kellermann, threw themselves into the arms of Dumouriez, and

acknowledged the superiority of his judgment and the accuracy of his

perception--while the soldiers proclaimed him the Fabius of his country.

But this name, which he accepted for a day, but ill responded to the

ardor of his soul; and he already meditated playing the part of

Hannibal, which was more consonant with the activity of his character

and the determination of his genius. At home, that of Caesar might one

day tempt him. This ambition of Dumouriez explains the unmolested

retreat of the Prussians through an enemy's country, and through defiles

which might easily have been converted into Caudine Forks, and under the

cannon of seventy thousand French, before which the weakened and

enervated army of the Duke of Brunswick had to make a flank movement.

While the military genius of Dumouriez triumphed over the Prussian army,

his political genius was not asleep; for his camp, during the last days

of the campaign, was at once the head-quarters of an army and the centre

of diplomatic negotiations. Dumouriez had created a connection, half

apparent, half secret, with the Duke of Brunswick and those officers and

ministers who had most influence over the King of Prussia. Danton, the

only minister who possessed any authority over Dumouriez, was in the

secret of these negotiations.

The Duke of Brunswick was no less desirous than Dumouriez to negotiate,

while fighting at the head-quarters of the King of Prussia were two

parties, one of whom wished to retain the King with the army, and the

other to remove him from it. The Count de Schulemberg, the King's

confidential agent, was the leader of the first, the Duke of Brunswick

of the second; Haugwitz, Lucchesini, Lombard, the King's secretary,

Kalkreuth, and the Prince de Hohenlohe were of the party of the latter.

The King resisted with the firmness of a man who has engaged his honor

in a great cause in the eyes of the world, and who wished to come off

with credit, or at least without loss of reputation. He remained with

the army, and sent the Count de Schulemberg to direct the operations in

Poland. From this day the Prince was exposed in his camp to an influence

whose interest it was to slacken his march and enervate his resolutions;

and from this day everything tended to a retreat.

The Duke of Brunswick only sought a pretext for opening negotiations

with the French at head-quarters. So long as he was behind the Argonne,

within ten leagues of Grandpre, this pretext did not offer itself, for

the King of Prussia would look on these advances as a proof of treason

or cowardice. The combat of Valmy, in the idea of the Duke of Brunswick,

was but a negotiation carried on by the mouth of the cannon. Dumouriez

held the fate of the French Revolution in his hands, and he could not

believe that this general would become the mere tool of anarchical

democracy. "He will cast the weight of his sword," said he, "to weigh

down the scale in favor of a constitutional monarchy; he will turn upon

the jailers of the King and the murderers of September. Guardian of the

frontiers, he has only to threaten to open them to the coalition, to

insure obedience from the National Assembly. An arrangement between

monarchical France and Prussia, under the auspices of Dumouriez, is a

thousand times preferable to a war in which Prussia stakes her army

against the despair of a nation."

FOOTNOTES:

[36] The royalists who left Paris or France in 1789 and after, on

account of the Revolution.--ED.

[37] The National Convention, which succeeded the Legislative Assembly,

actually opened September 21st.--ED.

[38] This was Louis Philippe, afterward known as "the Citizen-King." He

was the son of Philippe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, and was at this time

about twenty years old.--ED.

[39] Kellermann was created Duc de Valmy by Napoleon.--ED.

INVENTION OF THE COTTON-GIN

GROWTH OF THE COTTON INDUSTRY IN AMERICA

A.D. 1793

CHARLES W. DABNEY R. B. HANDY DENISON OLMSTED

Lord Macaulay declared that "what Peter the Great did to

make Russia dominant, Eli Whitney's invention of the

cotton-gin has more than equalled in its relation to the

power and progress of the United States." When Macaulay

delivered this opinion, "King Cotton" was more absolute in

the United States than to-day, for the cultivation of cotton

has since been supplemented in this country by other

industries of equal importance. Yet, what cotton had done

for the United States in Macaulay's day has been far

surpassed by its record since, as one of the great

industrial and commercial interests of the land; and judged

by export values, as estimated by the specialist Dabney, at

one time Assistant Secretary of Agriculture, cotton is still

king of the American market.

The growth of the cotton industry in the United States,

traced so minutely by Handy, witnesses from one decade to

another to the supreme achievement of the American inventor

so highly estimated by Macaulay. Eli Whitney was born at

Westboro, Massachusetts, in 1765, and died in 1825. In 1792

he was graduated at Yale College, and that year became a

teacher in Georgia, where he invented the cotton-gin. Before

he could secure a patent his machine was stolen from his

workshop, and others reaped the profits of his ingenuity. It

is pleasing to know that he afterward made a fortune by

other uses of his inventive skill. His service to the cotton

industry in all its departments has not only been vastly

influential in the development of his own country, but has

also greatly affected the relations of the United States

with other industrial nations, especially with Great

Britain, the leading cotton-manufacturing country of the

world.

CHARLES W. DABNEY

Cotton is the principal product of eight great States of the American

Union, and the most valuable "money crop" of the entire country.

Climatic conditions practically restrict its cultivation to a group of

States constituting less than one-fourth of the total area of the

country, and yet the value of the annual crop is exceeded among

cultivated products only by corn, which is grown in every State of the

Union, and occasionally by wheat. Cotton furnishes the raw material for

one of our most important manufacturing industries and from one-fourth

to one-third of our total exports.

Considered without reference to any particular country, its economic

importance is far beyond numerical expression; for while the total crop

of the world is approximately ascertainable, the effect of cotton upon

the commercial and social relations of mankind is too far-reaching for

estimation. Of the four great staples that provide man with

clothing--cotton, silk, wool, and flax--cotton, by reason of its

cheapness and its many excellencies, is rapidly superseding its several

rivals. Sixty years ago only about two million five hundred thousand

bales of cotton, or less than the present production of Texas, were

annually converted into clothing; the spindles of the world now use over

thirteen million bales per annum. Yet less than half the people of the

world are supplied with cotton goods made by modern machinery, and it

has been estimated that it would require annually a crop of forty-two

million bales of five hundred pounds each to raise the world's standard

of consumption to that of the principal nations.

Cotton stands preeminent among farm crops in the ease and cheapness of

its production, as compared with the variety and value of its products.

No crop makes so slight a drain upon the fertility of the soil, and for

none has modern enterprise found so many uses for its several parts. The

cotton plant yields, in fact, a double crop--a most beautiful fibre and

a seed yielding both oil and feed, which, although neglected for a long

time, is now esteemed worth one-sixth as much as the fibre. In addition

to this, the stems can be made to yield a fibre which waits only for a

machine to work it, and the roots yield a drug. It is entirely possible,

therefore, that cotton may ultimately be grown as much for these parts

as for the lint.

The history of cotton production in the United States differs from that

of almost every other agricultural product in several important

particulars. For nearly three-quarters of a century slave labor was

almost exclusively employed in this branch of agricultural industry, and

an immense majority of the colored people of to-day look to it for their

chief support. Cotton was also the great pioneer crop in the new

Southwestern States. Not only has the westward movement of the industry

been more rapid than that of any other crop, but the centre of

production has always been farther in advance of the centre of

population. As long ago as 1839 Mississippi was producing almost

one-fourth of the entire crop of the country. Recent years have

witnessed an enormous development in the regions to the west, which

would have carried the centre of production across the Mississippi River

if the cultivation of cotton, unlike that of wheat and corn and other

products, had not taken a new lease of life in the older States along

the Atlantic seaboard, where the use of manures has both extended the

area and increased the production.

Probably no equally great industry was ever more completely paralyzed or

had its future placed in greater jeopardy than cotton growing in the

United States during the war of 1861-1865. So great was the decrease in

production which followed the effectual closing of the ports that only

one bale of cotton was grown in 1864-1865 for every fifteen bales raised

in 1861-1862. The chief menace to the future of cotton production lay in

the efforts that were put forth by other cotton-growing countries at

this time to produce those particular varieties which had for so long

given the United States the monopoly of the European markets; and

nothing could more completely demonstrate the remarkable adaptation of

our Southern States to the growing of varieties which the experience of

generations has proved to be the best for manufacturing purposes than

the fact that it took them only thirteen years from the end of the war

to regain the primacy of position which they held at its commencement.

ROBERT B. HANDY

When cotton manufacture was introduced into England is not definitely

settled. There is no mention of the manufacture or use of cotton in the

celebrated poor-law of Elizabeth (1601), though hemp, flax, and wool are

expressly named. The first authentic record is in Roberts' _Treasure of

Traffic_, published in 1641; but it is possible, and even probable, that

the art was imported from Flanders by the artisans who fled from that

country to England in the latter part of the sixteenth century, as it is

probable that the manufacture had established itself more or less

firmly before it attracted the attention of the author of the

above-named pamphlet. We may presume, then, that it was well established

in England by 1641, but after that date the spread was not rapid. The

crudeness of the machinery for spinning was such that fine yarn could

not be made. Both spinning and weaving were done by individuals and

families in their own houses on clumsy and heavy machines. These

implements were but little better than those in use two thousand years

before. The distaff, the earliest of spinning-machines, was still in

use, and the best to be had was the one-thread spinning-wheel. The loom

used was scarcely an improvement on that which the East Indian had used

centuries before, though it was constructed with greater firmness and

compactness. Owing to imperfections in their machines, it was impossible

for the Europeans to make cotton yarn combining strength and firmness.

The yarn when spun was loose and flimsy; to make it strong it had to be

heavy.

The finished web had often to be carried a long distance to market. It

was only in 1760 that Manchester merchants began to furnish the weavers

in the neighboring villages with linen yarn and raw cotton and to pay a

fixed price for the perfected web, thus relieving the weavers of the

necessity of providing themselves with material and seeking a market for

their cloth, and enabling them to prosecute their employment with

greater regularity.

It was also about that time that England began to export her cotton

goods, for until then her weavers had not been able to do more than

supply the home demand. This foreign trade at once increased the demand

for cotton goods, and the increased demand presented a problem which the

manufacturers at first found difficult of solution. The procuring of

supplies of linen yarn needed for the warp of these textiles was not

difficult, but where was the cotton yarn to come from? The spinners were

producing already as much as their rude machines would permit, and

additional spinners were not to be had. The demand for cotton thread

exceeded the supply; the price of yarn rose with the demands of trade

and the extension of the manufacture and operated as a check to the

further increase of the exports. The trade had reached the point where

hand carders, single-thread spinning-wheels, and the hand-loom,

requiring a man to each machine, were clearly inadequate to the

service, and the cotton trade of Great Britain in the middle of the

eighteenth century seemed to have reached its limit. About this time

Hargreaves, Arkwright, Crompton, Cartwright, and Watt, men either

directly or indirectly engaged in and familiar with the needs of the

cotton manufacture, invented machines which raised the trade from an

experimental or at least a struggling industry into the most important

manufacture of the world. The carding-engine, the spinning-jenny, the

spinning-frame, the stocking-frame, the power-loom, and the adaptation

of the steam-engine to the propulsion of these machines, at once

supplied the means of producing an immense amount of yarn and cloth.

These inventions, it is true, were not in themselves perfect, but the

principles on which they were built are those on which the most

complicated textile machines of this day are based.

The supply of raw material to meet the demands of the trade was limited.

The West Indies, the Levant, and India were the countries from which

this supply was drawn, but they were unable to furnish enough raw cotton

to keep the new machines in operation, and it was necessary to look

elsewhere.

America was the only hope of the cotton manufacturer; but as at that

time the United States produced little or no cotton, for a few years all

the increased supply came from Brazil.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 14 · 第 26 / 36 段