Nor should I omit a translation into English by Mr. Elphinston:--

“He snatched the bolt from Heaven’s avenging hand,

Disarmed and drove the tyrant from the land.”[284]

A song, by the Abbé Morellet, written for one of the dinners of Madame

Helvétius, adopts, in some of its verses, the idea of Turgot.

“Comme un aigle audacieux,

Il a volé jusqu’aux cieux,

_Et dérobé le tonnerre_

Dont ils effrayaient la terre,

Heureux larcin

De l’habile Benjamin.

“L’Américain indompté

_Recouvre sa liberté_;

Et ce généreux ouvrage,

Autre exploit de notre sage,

Est mis à fin

Par Louis et Benjamin.”

These verses are characteristic of that intimate circle. _L’habile

Benjamin!_

Nothing with regard to Franklin is more curious than the Memoirs

of the long-lived Abbé,[285] including especially the humorous

engraving illustrating the benevolence of Nature in the construction

of the elbow, from a design by the lightning-and-sceptre-seizer.

In some copies this engraving is wanting. Franklin is represented

as fond especially of Scottish airs and _chansons à boire_, which

he accompanied sometimes on the harmonica, “an instrument, as is

known, of his invention.” The scandalous whispers with regard to him,

strangely adopted by a German traveller in our country,[286] had no

better authority, probably, than these hilarities and the well-known

“infatuation” of the court ladies. But the good Abbé, who saw him

so freely with the friends he loved, dwells on his exquisite social

qualities, his perfect good-nature, his simplicity of manners, his

uprightness of soul, which made itself felt in the smallest things, his

extreme tolerance, and, above all, his sweet serenity, changing easily

into gayety; and he describes the great void made in that circle when

he left for America.

* * * * *

In concluding this sketch, I wish to say that the literary

associations of the subject did not tempt me; but I could not resist

the inducement to present in proper light an interesting incident,

which is truly comprehended only when seen in its political relations.

Its history, even in details, becomes important, so that the verse

which occupied so much attention should be recognized not only in

its scholarly fascination, but in its wide-spread influence among

the learned and even the fashionable in Paris and throughout France,

binding this great nation by an unchangeable vow to the support of

American Liberty. Words are sometimes deeds; but never were words so

completely deeds as those with which Turgot welcomed Franklin. The

memory of that welcome cannot be forgotten in America. Can it ever be

forgotten in France?

* * * * *

And now the country is amazed by the report that the original welcome

of France to America, and the inspired welcome of Turgot to Franklin,

are forgotten by the France of this day, or, rather let me say,

forgotten by the Emperor, whose memory for the time is the memory of

France. It is said that Louis Napoleon is concerting alliance with the

Rebel Slavemongers of our country, founded on the recognition of their

independence, so that they may take their place as a new power in the

Family of Nations. Indeed, we have been told, through the columns of

the official organ, the “Moniteur,” that he wishes to do this thing.

Can he imagine that he follows the great example of the last century?

What madness!

The two cases are in conspicuous contrast,--as opposite as the poles,

as unlike as Liberty and Slavery.

The struggle for American independence was for Liberty, and was

elevated throughout by this holy cause. But the struggle for

Slavemonger independence is necessarily and plainly for Slavery, and

is degraded throughout by the unutterable vileness of its undisguised

pretensions.

The earlier struggle, adopted by the enlightened genius of France, was

solemnly placed under the benediction of “God and Liberty.” The present

struggle, happily thus far discarded by that same enlightened genius,

can have no other benediction than “Satan and Slavery.”

The earlier struggle was to snatch the sceptre from a kingly tyrant.

The present struggle is to put whips in the hands of Rebel Slavemongers

with which _to compel work without wages_, thus giving wicked power to

vulgar tyrants without number.

The earlier struggle was fitly pictured by the welcome of Turgot to

Franklin. But another feeling must be found, and other words invented,

to portray the struggle now seeking the protection of France.

The earlier struggle was grandly represented by Benjamin Franklin,

who was already known by a sublime discovery in science. The present

struggle is characteristically represented by John Slidell,[287] whose

great fame is from electioneering frauds to control a Presidential

election; so that his character is fitly drawn, when it is said that he

thrust fraudulent votes into the ballot-box, and whips into the hands

of taskmasters.

The earlier struggle was predicted by Turgot, who said, that, in the

course of Nature, colonies must drop from the parent stem, like ripe

fruit. But where is the Turgot who has predicted, that, in the course

of Nature, the great Republic must be broken to found a new power on

the corner-stone of Slavery?

The earlier struggle gathered about it the sympathy of the learned,

the good, and the wise, while the people of France rose up to call it

blessed. The present struggle can expect nothing but detestation from

all not lost to duty and honor, while the people of France must cover

it with curses.

The earlier struggle enjoyed the favor of France, whether in assemblies

of learning or of fashion, in spite of its King. It remains to be seen

if the present struggle must not ignobly fail in France, still mindful

of its early vows, in spite of its Emperor.

Where duty and honor are so plain, it is painful to think that even for

a moment there can be hesitation.

Alas for France!

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20) · 第 45 / 99 题