[613] [Greek: _kai neoteron eton heptakaideka mae katalegesthai

stratiotaen_] (Plut. l.c.).

[614] Plut. l.c. [Greek: _ton de nomon ... ho men haen klaerouchikos

hama nemon tois penaesi taen daemosian_.] Liv. _Ep_. lx Tulit ... legem

agrariam, quam et frater ejus tulerat. Vellei. ii. 6 (C. Gracchus)

dividebat agros, vetabat quemquam civem plus quingentis jugeribus

habere, quod aliquando lege Licinia cautum erat. Cf. Cic. _de Leg. Agr_.

i. 7. 21; ii. 5. 10; Oros. v. 12; Florus ii. 3 (iii. 15).

[615] _Lex Agraria_ (C.I.L. i. n. 200; Bruns _Fontes_ 1. 3. 11) 1. 6.

See p. 113, note 2.

[616] In 125 B.C. the census had been 394, 726 (Liv. _Ep_. lx), in 115

it was 394, 336 (Liv. _Ep_. lxiii). See de Boor _Fasti Censorii_.

[617] Herzog _Staatsverf_. i. p. 466.

[618] In 142 B.C. (Cic. _de Fin_. ii. 16. 54).

[619] Polyb. vi. 14.

[620] Cic. _pro Mur_. 28. 58; _pro Font_. 13. 38; _Brut_. 21. 81; _Div.

in Caec_. 21. 69; Tac_. Ann_ 111. 66. Valerius Maximus (viii. 1. 11) can

scarcely be correct in saying that the trial took place _apud populum_.

It seems to have been a trial for extortion.

[621] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 22. Cf. Cic. _Div. in Caec_. 21. 69

[Ascon.] in loc.; App. _Mithr_. 57.

[622] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 22 [Greek: _oi te presbeis oi kat auton eti

parontes syn phthono tauta permontes ekekragesan_.]

[623] Plut, _C. Gracch_. 5 [Greek: _ho de dikastikos (nomos) ho to

pleiston apekopse taes ton synklaetikon dynameos ... ho de priakosious

ton hippeon proskatelexen antois ousi triakosiois kai tas kriseis koinas

ton hexakosion epoiaese_]. Cf. _Compar_. 2. Liv. _Ep_. lx Tertiam (legem

tulit) qua equestrem ordinem, tunc cum senatu consentientem,

corrumperet: "ut sexcenti ex equitibus in curiam sublegerentur: et quia

illis temporibus trecenti tantum senatores erant, sexcenti equites

trecentis senatoribus admiscerentur": id est, ut equester ordo bis

tantum virium in senatu haberet.

[624] Vellei. ii. 6 C. Gracchus ... judicia a senatu transferebat ad

equites. (Cf. ii. 13. 32). Tac. _Ann_. xii. 60 Cum Semproniis

rogationibus equester ordo in possessione judiciorum locaretur. Plin.

_H.N_. xxxiii. 34 Judicum autem appellatione separare eum (equestrem)

ordinem primi omnium instituere Gracchi, discordi popularitate in

contumeliam senatus. Cf. Diod. xxxv. 25; xxxvii. 9; App. _Bell.

Civ_. 1. 22.

[625] The qualifications of the Gracchan jurors were probably identical

with those required for jurors under the extant _lex Repetundarum_ (C.I.

L. i. n. 198; Bruns _Fontes_ i. 3. 10) which is probably the _lex

Acilia_ (Cic. _in Verr_. Act. i. 17. 51; cf. Mommsen in C.I.L. l.c.).

The conditions fixed by this law are as follows (ll. 12, l3):--Praetor

quei inter peregrinos jous deicet, is in diebus x proxumeis, quibus h. l.

populus plebesve jouserit, facito utei CDL viros legat, quei in hac

civit[ate ... dum nei quem eorum legat, quei tr. pl., q., iii vir cap.,

tr. mil. l. iv primis aliqua earum, iii vi]rum a. d. a. siet fueri[tve,

queive mercede conductus depugnavit depugnaverit, queive quaestione

joudicioque puplico conde]mnatus siet quod circa eum in senatum legei

non liceat, queive minor anneis xxx majorve annos lx gnatus siet, queive

in u[rbem Romam propiusve urbem Romam passus M domicilium non habeat,

queive ejus magistratus, quei supra scriptus est, pater frater filiusve

siet, queive ejus, quei in senatu siet fueritve, pater frater filiusve

siet, queive trans mar]e erit. (Cf. ll. 16, 17). Unfortunately the main

qualification for the jurors, which was stated after the words "in hac

civitate," has been lost.

[626] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 6 [Greek: _kakeino tous krinountas ek ton

hippeon hedoken (ho daemos) katalexai_].

[627] The _lex Acilia_ says "within ten days of its becoming law" (p.

214, note 2). If Plutarch _(l.c.)_ is right about Gracchus selecting the

original judices, the provision of this _lex_ shows that it cannot be,

as some have thought, the law which first _created_ the Gracchan jurors.

It must have been passed subsequently to Gracchus's own _lex

judiciaria_.

[628] In the Ciceronian period we find a knight as a _judex_ in a civil

case (Cic. _pro Rosc. Com_. 14. 42), but it is not probable that

senators were ever excluded from the civil bench. See Greenidge _Legal

Procedure of Cicero's Time_ p. 265.

[629] Cic. _in Verr_. Act. i. 13. 38.

[630] Cic. _pro Cluent_. 56. 154 Lege ... quae tum erat Sempronia, nunc

est Cornelia (i.e. the law mentioned in note 4) ... intellegebant ...

ea lege equestrem ordinem non teneri. Livius Drusus in 91 B.C. attempted

to fix a retrospective liability on the equestrian jurors (Cic. _pro

Rab. Post_ 7. 16). Cf. App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 35. Yet Appian elsewhere

(_Bell. Civ_. i. 22) says that the equites obviated trials for bribery

[Greek: _synistamenoi sphisin autois kai biazomenoi_]. It is possible

that prosecutions for corruption before the _judicia populi_ are meant.

See Strachan-Davidson in loc.

[631] Cic. _pro Cluent_. 55. 151 Hanc ipsam legem NE QUIS JUDICIO

CIRCUMVENIRETUR C. Gracchus tulit; eam legem pro plebe, non in plebem

tulit. Postea L. Sulla ... cum ejus rei quaestionem hac ipsa lege

constitueret, ... populum Romanum ... alligare novo quaestionis genere

ausus non est. 56. 154 Illi non hoc recusabant, ea ne lege accusarentur

... quae tum erat Sempronia, nunc est Cornelia ... intellegebant enim ea

lege equestrem ordinem non teneri.

[632] Gell. 1. xx. 7; Justin. _Inst_. iv. 5. 2.

[633] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 22.

[634] App. l.c. [Greek: _kataegorous te enetous epi tois plousiois

epaegonto_].

[635] C. Gracchus ap. Gell. xi. 10 Ego ipse, qui aput vos verba facio,

uti vectigalia vestra augeatis, quo facilius vestra commoda et rem

publicam administrare possitis, non gratis prodeo.

[636] Vellei. ii. 6. 3 Nova constituebat portoria.

[637] Cf. App. _Bell. Civ_. v. 4 (M. Antonius to the Asiatics) [Greek:

_ous ... eteleite phorous Attalo, methaekamen hymin, mechri, daemokopon

andron kai par' haemin genomenon, edeaese phoron, epei de edeaesen ...

merae pherein ton ekastote karpon epetazamen_].

[638] Fronto _ad Verum_ p. 125 (Naber) Gracchus locabat Asiam. Cic.

_in Verr_. iii. 6. 12 Inter Siciliam ceterasque provincias, judices, in

agrorum vectigalium ratione hoc interest, quod ceteris aut impositum

vectigal est certum ... aut censoria locatio constituta est, ut Asiae

lege Sempronia.

[639] Decumani, hoc est, principes et quasi senatores publicanorum (Cic.

_in Verr_. ii. 71. 175).

[640] Polyb. vi. 17.

[641] Schol. Bob. p. 259 Cum princeps esset publicanorum Cn. Plancii

pater, et societas eadem in exercendis vectigalibus gravissimo damno

videretur adfecta, desideratum est in senatu nomine publicanorum ut cum

iis ratio putaretur lege Sempronia, et remissionis tantum fieret de

summa pecunia, quantum aequitas postularet, pro quantitate damnorum

quibus fuerant hostili incursione vexati (60 B.C.; cf. Cic. _ad Att_.

i. 17. 9).

[642] Varro ap. Non. p. 308 G. Equestri ordini judicia tradidit ac

bicipitem civitatem fecit discordiarum civilium fontem. Cf. Florus ii. 5

(iii. 17).

[643] Diod. xxxvii. 9 [Greek: _apeilousaes taes synklaetou polemon to

Grakcho dia taen metathesin ton kritaerion, tetharraekotos outos eipen

hoti kan apothano, ou dialeipso to eiphos apo taes pleuras ton

synklaetikon diaeraemenos_.] Diodorus has preserved the utterance in a

more intelligible form than Cicero (_de Leg_. iii. 9. 20 C. vero

Gracchus ... sicis iis, quas ipse se projecisse in forum dixit, quibus

digladiarentur inter se cives, nonne omnem rei publicae statum

permutavit?).

[644] Cic. _pro Domo_ 9, 24 Tu provincias consulares, quas C. Gracchus,

qui unus maxime popularis fuit, non modo non abstulit a senatu, sed

etiam, ut necesse esset quotannis constitui per senatum decretas lege

sanxit, eas lege Sempronia per senatum decretas rescidisti. Sall, _Fug_.

27 Lege Sempronia provinciae futuris consulibus Numidia atque Italia

decretae. Cic. _de Prov. Cons_. 2. 3 Decernendae nobis sunt lege

Sempronia duae (provinciae). Cf. _ad Fam_. i. 7. 10; _pro Balbo_ 27. 61.

[645] Cic. _de Prov. Cons_. 7. 17.

[646] The colonists were to be [Greek: _oi chariestatoi ton politon_]

(Plut. _C. Gracch_. 9).

[647] Liv. _Ep_. lx Legibus agrariis latis effecit ut complures coloniae

in Italia deducerentur. Cf. Plut. _C. Gracch_, 6. App. _Bell. Civ_. 1.

23; Foundations at Abellinum, Cadatia, Suessa Aurunca etc. are

attributed to a _lex Sempronia_ or _lex Graccana_ in _Liber Coloniarum_

(_Gromatici_ Lachmann) pp. 229, 233, 237, 238; cf. pp. 216, 219, 228,

255. It is difficult to say whether they were products of the Gracchan

agrarian or colonial law. In either case, these foundations may have

been subsequent to his death, as neither law was repealed.

[648] Vellei. 1. 15 Et post annum (i.e. a year after the foundation

of Fabrateria, see p. 171) Scolacium Minervium, Tarentum Neptunia

(coloniae conditae sunt).

[649] Forbiger _Handb. der Alt. Geogr_. ii. p. 503.

[650] L'Année _Epigraphique_, 1896, pp. 30, 31.

[651] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 8.

[652] Vellei. ii. 6 Novis coloniis replebat provincias. This may be

wrong as a fact but true as an intention.

[653] Vellei. ii. 7.

[654] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 10 [Greek: _Rhoubrion ton synarchonton henos

oikizesthai Karchaedona grapsantos anaeraemenaen hypo Skaepionos_]....

_Lex Acilia_ 1. 22 Queive 1. Rubria in. vir col. ded. creatus siet

fueritve. Cf. _Lex Agraria_ 1. 59. Oros. v. 12 L. Caecilio Metello et Q.

Titio (_Scr_. T. Quinctio) Flaminino coss. Carthago in Africa restitui

jussa vicensimo secundo demum anno quam fuerat eversa deductis civium

Romanorum familiis, quae eam incolerent, restituta et repleta est. Cf.

Eutrop. iv. 21.

[655] Mommsen in C.I.L. i. pp. 75 ff.

[656] Mommsen l.c. This was the tenure afterwards called that of the

_jus Italicum_.

[657] Liv. _Ep_. ix; App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 24.

[658] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 6; App, _Bell. Civ_, i. 23.

[659] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 7.

[660] Nitzsch _Die Gracchen_ p. 402.

[661] These are apparently the _Viasii vicani_ of the _lex Agraria_.

Sometimes the service was performed by personal labour (_operae_), at

other times a _vectigal_ was demanded. See Mommsen in C.I.L. l.c.

[662] Cic. _ad Fam_. viii. 6. 5; cf. Mommsen l.c.

[663] This was prohibited by a _lex Licinia_ and a _lex Aebutia_ which

Cicero (_de Leg. Agr_. ii. 8. 21) calls _veteres tribuniciae_. But it is

possible that they were post-Gracchan. See Mommsen _Staatsr_. ii.

p. 630.

[664] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 23 [Greek: _ho de Grakchos kai hodous etemnen

ana ten Italian makras, plaethos ergolabon kai cheirotechnon hyph' eauto

poionmenos, hetoimon es ho ti keleuoi_]

[665] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 8.

[666] Cic. _Brut_. 26, 100.

[667] Mommsen in C.I.L. i. p. 158.

[668] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 6.

[669] Seneca _de Ben_, vi. 34. 2 Apud nos primi omnium Gracchus et mox

Livius Drusus instituerunt segregate turbam suam et alios in secretum

recipere, alios cum pluribus, alios universos. Habuerunt itaque isti

amicos primos, habuerunt secundos, numquam veros.

[670] The name of the law was probably _lex de sociis et nomine Latino_.

See Cic. _Brut_. 26. 99.

[671] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 23 [Greek: _kai tous Latinous epi panta

ekalei ta Rhomaion, hos ouk euprepos sygnenesi taes boulaes antistaenai

dynamenaes; ton de heteron symmachon hois ouk ezaen psaephon en tais

Rhomaion cheirotoniais pherein, edidous pherein apo toude, epi to echein

kai tousde en tais cherotioniais ton nomon auto syntelountas_]. The

words [Greek: _psaephon k.t.l._] refer to the limited suffrage granted to

Latin _incolae_ (Liv. xxv. 3. 16); but the voting power of his new

Latins would be so small that the motive attributed to this measure by

Appian is improbable. See Strachan-Davidson in loc. Other accounts of

Gracchus's proposal ignore this distinction between Latins and Italians,

e.g. Plutarch (_C. Gracch_. 5) describes his law as [Greek: _isopsaephous

toion tois politais tous Italiotas_] and Velleius says (ii. 6) Dabat

civitatem omnibus Italicis.

[672] If we may trust Velleius (ii. 6) Dabat civitatem omnibus Italicis,

extendebat eam paene usque Alpis. Cisalpine Gaul was not yet a separate

province, but it was not regarded as a part of Italy. The Latin colonies

between the Padus and the Rubicon would certainly have received Roman

rights, and this may have been the case with a Latin township north of

the Padus such as Aquileia. But it is doubtful whether Latin rights

would have been given to the towns between the Padus and the Alps. These

_Transpadani_ received _Latinitas_ in 89 B.C. (Ascon. _in Pisonian_.

P. 3).

[673] C. Gracch. ap, Gell. x. 3. 3.

[674] Fann. ap. Jul. Victor 6. 6. A speech of Fannius as consul against

Caius Gracchus is also mentioned by Charisius p. 143 Keil.

[675] Cic. Brut. 26. 99.

[676] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 23.

[677] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 12 [Greek: _antexethaeken ho Gaios diagramma

kataegoron ton hypaton, kai tois symmachois, an menosi, boaethaesein

epangellomenos_.] The invective may have been directed against Fannius,

According to Appian (l.c.) both consuls had been instructed by the

senate to issue the edict.

[678] If it had been hampered in this way, the judicial protection of

_peregrini_ against the judgments of the Praetor Peregrinus would have

been impossible.

[679] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 12.

[680] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 23.

[681] [Sall.] _de Rep. Ord_. ii. 8 Magistratibus creandis haud mihi

quidem apsurde placet lex quam C. Gracchus in tribunatu promulgaverat,

ut ex confusis quinque classibus sorte centuriae vocarentur. Ita

coaequatus dignitate pecunia, virtute anteire alius alium properabit.

[682] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 8.

[683] Vir et oratione gravis et auctoritate (Cic. _Brut_. 28. 109)

[Greek: _haethei de kai logo kai plouto tois malista timomenois kai

dynamenois apo touton enamillos_] (Plut. _C. Gracch_. 8).

[684] Suet. _Tib_. 3 Ob eximiam adversus Gracchos operam "patronus

senatus" dictus.

[685] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 9.

[686] App. _Bell. Civ_ i. 35.

[687] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 10.

[688] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 9 [Greek: _Libios de kai taen apophoran

tautaen_] (which had been imposed by the Gracchan laws) [Greek: _ton

neimamenon aphairon haeresken autois_]. The tense of _neimamenon_ seems

to show that the Gracchan as well as the Livian settlers are meant. See

Underhill in loc. In any case, the reimposition of the _vectigal_ on

the allotments by the law of 119 (App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 27) proves that

it had been remitted before this date.

[689] [Greek: _hopos maed' epi strateias exae tina Latinon rhabdois

aikisasthai_] (Plut. _C. Gracch_. 9).

[690] The _lex Acilia Repetundarum_ grants them the right of appeal as

an alternative to citizenship as a reward for successful prosecution.

Cf. the similar provision in the franchise law of Flaccus (p. 168).

[691] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 9.

[692] Appian (_Bell. Civ_. i. 24) says that Gracchus was accompanied by

Fulvius Flaccus. Plutarch (_C. Gracch_. 10) implies that the latter

stayed at Rome.

[693] App. l.c. Appian represents this measure as having been proposed

after the return of the commissioners to Rome. The words of Plutarch

(_C. Gracch_. 8) [Greek: _apaertaesato to plaethos ... kakon ... epi

koinoniai politeias tous Latinous_] probably refer to an invitation of

the Latins to share in these citizen colonies.

[694] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 10.

[695] Mommsen in C.I.L. l.c.

[696] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 11.

[697] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 24. According to Appian, the wolf event

occurred after Gracchus had quitted Africa.

[698] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 11.

[699] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 12.

[700] Ibid. [Greek: _synetyche d' auto kai pros tous synarchontas en

orgae genesthai. synarchontas_] here is not limited to his colleagues

in the tribunate.

[701] [Greek: _exemisthoun_] (Plut. l.c.), probably to contractors who

would sublet the seats.

[702] Beesly _The Gracchi, Marius and Sulla_ p. 53.

[703] [Greek: _psaephon men auto pleiston genomenon, adikos de kai

kakourgos ton synarchonton poiaesamenon taen anagoreusin kai anadeixin_].

(Plut. l.c.)

[704] Cic. _in Pis_. 15. 36; Varro _R.R_. iii. 5. 18.

[705] [Greek: _hos Sardonion gelota gelosin, ou gignoskontes hoson

autois skotos ek ton auton perikechytai politeumaton_.] (Plut. l.c.)

[706] Cic. _pro Caec_. 33. 95; _pro Domo_ 40. 106.

[707] [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 65.

[708] Cornelia ap. Corn. Nep. fr. 16 Ne id quidem tam breve spatium

(sc. vitae) potest opitulari quin et mihi adversere et rem publicam

profliges? Denique quae pausa erit? Ecquando desinet familia nostra

insanire? Ecquando modus ei rei haberi poterit? Ecquando desinemus et

habentes et praebentes molestiis insistere? Ecquando perpudescet

miscenda atque perturbanda re publica?

[709] [Greek: _hos dae theristas_] (Plut. _C. Gracch_. 13).

[710] Plutarch (l.c.) says that the consul had "sacrificed" [Greek:

(_thysantos_)] and, if this is correct, Opimius must have summoned

the meeting.

[711] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 25.

[712] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 13; App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 25; [Victor] _de Vir.

III_. 65. The last author calls the slain man Attilius and describes him

as "praeco Opimii consulis". Cf. Ihne _Röm. Gesch_. v. p. 103.

[713] [Victor] l.c. Imprudens contionem a tribuno plebis avocavit.

Cf. App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 25.

[714] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 14.

[715] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 25.

[716] App. l.c.

[717] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 14.

[718] Cic. _Phil_. viii. 4. 14 Quod L. Opimius consul verba fecit de re

publica, de ea re ita censuerunt, uti L. Opimius consul rem publicam

defenderet. Senatus haec verbis, Opimius armis. Cf. _in Cat_. i. 2. 4;

iv. 5. 10. Plut. _C. Gracch_. 14 [Greek: _eis to bouleutaerion

apelthontes epsaephisanto kai prosetaxan Opimio to hypato sozein taen

polin hopos dynaito kai katalyein tous tyrannous_.]

[719] Plut. l.c.

[720] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 26.

[721] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 14.

[722] Ibid. 15.

[723] App. _Bell. Civ. i_. 26.

[724] Cf. Bardey _Das sechste Consulat des Marius_ p. 61.

[725] Plut. l.c.

[726] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 16; App. l.c.

[727] Plut. l.c.

[728] Plut. l.c.

[729] Cic. _in Cat_. iv. 6. 13.

[730] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 26. Plut. (_C. Gracch_. 16) states that

Flaccus fled to a bathroom ([Greek: _eis ti balaneion_]).

[731] Dionys. viii. 80.

[732] Plut. l.c.

[733] Val. Max. iv. 7. 2; [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 65; Oros, v. 12.

Plutarch (l.c.) gives he second name as Licinius.

[734] Plut. l.c.

[735] [Victor] l.c.

[736] Translated "Grove of the Furies" by Plutarch; cf. Cic. _de Nat.

Deor_. iii. 18. 46. The true name of the grove was Lucus Furrinae, named

after some goddess, whose significance was forgotten (Varro _L. L_. vi.

19 Nunc vix nomen notum paucis). See Richter _Topographie_ p. 271.

[737] Plut. _C. Gracch_. 17. Cf. Val. Max. vi. 8. 3.

[738] Plin. _H.N_. xxxiii. 3. 48. Cf. Plut. l.c.; [Victor] l.c.;

Florus ii. 3 (iii. 15).

[739] Oros. v. 12.

[740] Oros. l.c. Opimius consul sicut in bello fortis fuit ita in

quaestione crudelis. Nam amplius tria milia hominum suppliciis necavit,

ex quibus plurimi ne dicta quidem causa innocentes interfecti sunt.

Plutarch (l.c.) gives three thousand as the number actually slain in

the tumult. Orosius (l.c.) gives the number slain on the Aventine as

two hundred and fifty. For the severity with which Opimius conducted the

_quaestio_ see Sall. _Jug_. 16. 2, 31. 7; Vellei. ii. 7.

[741] Plut. l.c.

[742] Dig. xxiv. 3. 66. The passage speaks of Licinia's dowry; yet

Plutarch (l.c.) says that this was confiscated.

[743] In Plutarch's Greek version (C. Gracch, 17) [Greek: _ergon

aponoias_] (vecordiae) [Greek: _naon homonoias_] (concordiae)

[Greek: _poiei_].

[744] Cf. Neumann _Geschichte Roms_. p. 259.

[745] Plut, _C. Gracch_, 18.

[746] Plut. _C, Gracch_, 19.

[747] Plin. _H.N_. xxxiv. 6. 31.

[748] Hence the establishment of the _praefecti jure dicundo_, sent to

the burgess colonies and _municipia_.

[749] Arist. _Pol_. iv. 6, p. 1292 b.

[750] The choice of the month of July as the date for elections seems to

be post-Sullan. See Mommsen _Staatsr_. i. p. 583. During the Jugurthine

War consular elections took place, as we shall see, in the late autumn

or even in the winter.

[751] Suet. _Caes_. 42.

[752] If some of the Gracchan assignments were thirty _jugera_ each (p.

115). The larger assignments of earlier times had been from seven to ten

_jugera_. See Mommsen in C.I. L. i. pp. 75 foll.

[753] Liv. _Ep_. lxi L. Opimius accusatus apud populum a Q. Decio

tribuno plebis quod indemnatos cives in carcerem conjecisset, absolutus

est. "In carcerem conjicere" does not express the whole truth. A

magistrate could imprison in preparation for a trial. The words must

imply imprisonment preparatory to execution and probably refer to death

in the Tullianum.

[754] Cic. _de Orat_. ii. 30. 132; _Part. Orat_. 30, 104. In the latter

passage Opimius is supposed to say "Jure feci, salutis omnium et

conservandae rei publicae causa." Decius is supposed to answer "Ne

sceleratissimum quidem civem sine judicio jure ullo necare potuisti."

The cardinal question therefore is "Potueritne recte salutis rei

publicae causa civem eversorem civitatis indemnatum necare?" Cf. Cic.

_de Orat_. ii. 39. 165 Si ex vocabulo, ut Carbo: Sei consul est qui

consuluit patriae, quid aliud fecit Opimius?

[755] Cf. Cic. _pro Sest_. 67. 140 (Opimium) flagrantem invidia

propter interitum C. Gracchi semper ipse populus Romanus periculo

liberavit.

[756] Cic. _Brut_. 34. 128 L. Bestia ... P. Popillium vi C. Gracchi

expulsum sua rogatione restituit. Cf. _post Red. in Sen_. 15. 38; _post

Red. ad Quir_. 4.10.

[757] Cic. _in Cat_. iv. 6, 13; _Phil_. viii. 4. 14.

[758] Val. Max. v. 3. 2. The colouring of the story is doubted by Ihne

(_Rom. Gesch_. v. p. 111). He thinks that perhaps Lentulus went to

Sicily to restore his shattered health.

[759] Cic. _de Orat_. ii. 25. 106; 39. 165; 40. 170.

[760] Ibid. ii. 39. 165.

[761] Cic. _Brut_. 43. 159 Crassus ... accusavit C. Carbonem,

eloquentissimum hominem, admodum adulescens. Cf. _de Orat_. i. 10. 39.

[762] Valerius Maximus (vi. 5. 6) tells the story that a slave of

Carbo's brought Crassus a letter-case (_scrinium_) full of compromising

papers. Crassus sent back the case still sealed and the slave in

chains to Carbo.

[763] Mommsen, _Hist. of Rome_ bk. iv. c. 4.

[764] Cic. _in Verr_. iii. i. 3 Itaque hoc, judices, ex ... L. Crasso

saepe auditum est, cum se nullius rei tam paenitere diceret quam quod

C. Carbonem unquam in judicium vocavisset.

[765] Cic. _ad Fam_. ix. 21. 3 (C. Carbo) accusante L. Crasso

cantharidas sumpsisse dicitur. Valerius Maximus (iii. 7. 6) implies that

Carbo was sent into exile. But the two stories are not necessarily

inconsistent.

[766] Appian (_Bell. Civ_. i. 35) says that the younger Livius Drusus

(91 B.C.) [Greek: _ton daemon ... hypaegeto apoikiais pollais es te taen

Italian kai Sikelian epsaephismenais men ek pollou, gegonuiais de oupo_].

These colonies could only have been those proposed by his father.

[767] Mommsen in C.I.L. 1 pp. 75 ff. Cf. p. 227. We have no record

of the tenure by which Romans held their lands in such settlements as

Palma and Pollentia (p. 189). They too may have been illustrations of

what was known later as the _jus Italicum_.

[768] We know that the corn law of C. Gracchus was repealed or modified

by a _lex Octavia_. Cic. _Brut_. 62. 222 (M. Octavius) tantum

auctoritate dicendoque valuit, ut legem Semproniam frumentariam populi

frequentis suffragiis abrogaverit. Cf. _de Off_. ii. 21. 72. But the

date of this alteration is unknown and it may not have been immediate.

If it was a consequence of Gracchus's fall, as is thought by Peter

(_Gesch. Roms_. ii. p. 41), the distributions may have been restored

_circa_ 119 B.C. (see p. 287). We shall see that in the tribunate of

Marius during this year some proposal about corn was before the people

(Plut. _Mar_. 4).

[769] App. _Bell. Civ_. i. 27 [Greek: _nomos te ou poly hysteron

ekyrhothae, taen gaen, hyper haes dietheronto, exeinai pipraskein tois

echousin_.]

[770] App. l.c. [Greek: _kai euthus oi plousioi para ton penaeton

eonounto, hae taisde tais prophasesin ebiazonto_.]

[771] The law permitting alienation may have been in 121 B.C. The year

119 or 118 B.C. ([Greek: _pentekaideka maliosta etesin apo taes Grakchou

nomothesias_]) is given by Appian (l.c.) for one of the two subsequent

laws which he speaks of. It is probably the date of the first of these,

the one which we are now considering.

[772] App. l.c. [Greek: _Sporios Thorios daemarchon esaegaesato nomon,

taen men gaen maeketi sianemein, all' einai ton echonton, kai phorous

hyper autaes to daemo katatithesthai, kai tade ta chrhaemata chorein es

dianomas_.]

[773] If Gracchus's corn law was abolished or modified immediately after

his fall, the corn largesses may now have been restored or extended.

Cf. p. 306.

[774] Some such guarantee may be inferred from a passage in the _lex

Agraria_ (l. 29) Item Latino peregrinoque, quibus M. Livio L. Calpurnio

[cos. in eis agris id facere ... ex lege plebeive sc(ito) exve

foedere licuit.]

[775] Cic. _Brut_. 36. 136 Sp. Thorius satis valuit in populari genere

dicendi, is qui agrum publicum vitiosa et inutili lege vectigali

levavit. Cf. _de Orat_. ii. 70. 284. Appian, on the other hand; makes

Sp. Thorius the author of the law preceding this (p. 285). It is

possible that Cicero may be mistaken, but, if he is correct, the

fragments of the agrarian law which we possess may be those of the _lex

Thoria_, the name given to it by its earlier editors. For a different

view see Mommsen in C.I.L. i. pp. 75 ff.

[776] App. _Bell Civ_. i. 27 [Greek: _tous phorous ou poly hysteron

dielyse daemarchos heteros_.]

[777] The latest years to which it refers are those of the censors of

115 and the consuls of 113, 112 and 111. The harvest and future vintage

of 111 are referred to (1. 95), and it has, therefore, been assigned to

some period between January 1 and the summer of this year. See Rudorff

_Das Ackergesetz des Sp. Thorius_ and cf. Mommsen l.c. It is a

curious fact, however, that a law dealing with African land amongst

others should have been passed in the first year of active hostilities

with Jugurtha. From this point of view the date which marks the close of

the Jugurthine war, suggested by Kiene (_Bundesgenossenkrieg_ p. 125),

i.e., 106 or 105 B.C., is more probable. But the objection to this

view is that the law contains no reference to the censors of 109. See

Mommsen l.c.

[778] _Ager compascuus_. See Mommsen l.c. and Voigt _Ueber die

staatsrechtliche possessio und den ager compascuus der röm. Republik_.

[779] The _pastores_ also must often have been too indefinite a body to

make it possible to treat them as joint owners.

[780] The tribune L. Marcius Philippus, when introducing an agrarian law

in 104 B.C., made the startling statement "Non esse in civitate duo

milia hominum, qui rem haberent" (Cic. _de Off_. ii. 21, 73). If there

was even a minimum of truth in his words, the expression "qui rem

haberent" must mean "moneyed men," "people comfortably off."

[781] Mommsen in C.I.L. l.c.

[782] Kiene also thinks (_Bundesgenossenkrieg_ p. 146) that the right

given by the law of exchanging a bit of one's own land for an equivalent

bit of the public domain, which became private property, was reserved

solely for the citizen.

[783] Cic. _Brut_. 26. 102; _de Orat_. ii. 70. 281; _de Fin_. i. 3. 8.

[784] Vellei. ii. 8; Cic. _in Verr_. iii 80. 184; iv. 10. 22.

[785] [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 72 Consul legem de sumptibus et

libertinorum suffragiis tulit.

[786] Liv. xlv, 15.

[787] [Victor] l.c..

[788] Plin. _H.N_. viii. 57. 223.

[789] Cassiodor. _Chron_. L. Metellus et Cn. Domitius censores artem

ludicram ex urbe removerunt praeter Latinum tibicinem cum cantore et

ludum talarium. The _ludus talarius_ in its chief form was a game of

skill, not of chance. The reference here may be to juggling with the

_tali_ on the stage, not to the pursuit of the game in domestic life.

[790] Liv. _Ep_. lxiii.

[791] _Fast. triumph_.; [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 72.

[792] Val. Max. vii. 1. 1.

[793] [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 72.

[794] [Victor] l.c. Ipse primo dubitavit honores peteret an

argentariam faceret.

[795] [Victor] l.c. Aedilis juri reddendo magis quam muneri edendo

studuit.

[796] Sallust (_Jug_. 15) gives the following somewhat unkind sketch of

the great senatorial champion, "Aemilius Scaurus, homo nobilis, inpiger,

factiosus, avidus potentiae, honoris, divitiarum, ceterum vitia sua

callide occultans". "Inpiger, factiosus" are testimonies of his value to

his party. The last words of the sketch are a confession that his

reputation may have been blemished by suspicion, but never by proof.

[797] [Victor] l.c. Consul Ligures et Gantiscos domuit, atque de his

triumphavit. Cf. _Fast. triumph_.

[798] [Victor] l.c.

[799] Plut. _Mar_. 3.

[800] In Velleius ii. 11 the manuscript reading _natus equestri loco_

(corrected into _agresti_) may be correct.

[801] Plut. _Mar_. 3.

[802] Plut. _Mar_. 5.

[803] Ibid. 4.

[804] His military reputation amongst old soldiers had led to his easy

attainment of the military tribunate. Sall. _Jug_. 63 Ubi primum

tribunatum militarem a populo petit, plerisque faciem ejus ignorantibus,

facile notus per omnis tribus declaratur. Deinde ab eo magistratu alium

post alium sibi peperit.

[805] Plut. _Mar_. 4.

[806] Plut. l.c. [Greek: _nomon tina peri psaephophorias graphontos

autou dokounta ton dynaton aphaireisthai taen peri tas kriseis ischyn_].

It is possible, however, that _kriseis_ may simply mean "decisions".

[807] Cic. _de Leg_. iii. 17. 38 Pontes ... lex Maria fecit angustos.

[808] Plut. l.c. [Greek: _ei me diagrapseie to dogma_.]

[809] Plut. l.c. [Greek: _nomou ... eispheromenou peri sitou

dianomaes_]. See p. 284.

[810] Plut. _Mar_ 5. Cf. Cic. _pro Planc_. 21, 51; Val. Max.

vi. 9. 14.

[811] Val. Max. vi. 9. 14.

[812] Plut. _Mar_. 5.

[813] [Greek: _dikastai_] (Plut. l.c.). It seems, therefore, that a

special _quaestio de ambitu_ existed at this time. Otherwise, the case

would naturally have gone before the Comitia. We can hardly think of a

Special Commission.

[814] Plut. _Mar_. 6 [Greek: _en men oun tae strataegia metrios

epainoumenon heauton paresche_].

[815] Plut. l.c.

[816] Plut. l.c.

[817] Vellei. ii. 7 Porcio Marcioque consulibus deducta colonia Narbo

Martius. Cf. i. 15.

[818] This was but a [Greek: _phroura Rhomaion_] (Strabo iv. 1. 5). It

had been established in 122 B.C.

[819] Cic. _pro Font_. 5. 13 Narbo Martius, colonia nostrorum civium,

specula populi Romani ac propugnaculum istis ipsis nationibus oppositum

et objectum.

[820] This fact appears from Cic. _pro Cluent_. 51. 140 (Crassus) in

dissuasione rogationis ejus quae contra coloniam Narbonensem ferebatur,

quantum potest, de auctoritate senatus detrahit. A _rogatio_ against a

project implies something more than opposition to a bill.

[821] Cic. _Brut_. 43. 160 Exstat in eam legem senior ut ita dicam quam

illa aetas ferebat oratio.

[822] Cic. _Brut. l.c. Cf. pro Cluent_. 51. 140; _de Orat_. ii. 55. 223;

Quinctil. _Inst. Or_. vi. 3. 44.

[823] The date is unknown, but the _lex Servilia repetundarum_ was

probably a product of this tribunate. An approximate date can be

assigned to this law, if we believe that it immediately superseded the

_lex Acilia_ as the law of extortion, and that the _lex Acilia_ is the

_lex repetundarum_ which has come down to us on a bronze tablet (see p.

214); for the latter law must have been abrogated by 111 B.C., since the

back of the tablet on which it is inscribed is used for the _lex

agraria_ of this year. The side containing the _lex Acilia_ must have

been turned to the wall, and this fact seems to prove the supersession

of this law by a later one on the same subject. See Mommsen in C.I.L.

i. p. 56.

[824] Peracutus et callidus cum primisque ridiculus (Cic. _Brut_.

62. 224).

[825] Cic. _pro Rab. Post, 6, 14.

[826] Stercus Curiae (Cic. _de Orat_. iii. 41. 164).

[827] Cic. _Brut_. 62. 224 Is ... equestrem ordinem beneficio legis

devinxerat. Cf. _pro Scauro_ 1. 2. But the law of Glaucia was a _lex

repetundarum_ (Ascon. _in Scaurian_. p. 21; Val. Max. viii. 1. 8; cf.

notes 4 and 5), not a _lex judiciaria_.

[828] Cic. _in Verr_. i. 9. 26.

[829] Cic. _pro Rab. Post_. 4. 8. The granting of the _civitas_ to

Latins, as a reward for successful prosecution (Cic. _pro Balbo_ 24.

54), was not an innovation due to Glaucia. It appears already in the

_lex Acilia_.

[830] Liv. _Ep_. lxiii; Florus i. 39 (iii. 4); Eutrop. iv. 24.

[831] Oros. v. 15.

[832] Plut. _Quaest. Rom_. 83.

[833] Plut. _Quaest. Rom_. 83. The manuscript reading is [Greek:

_barbarou tinos hippikou therapon_]. I have adopted Ihne's suggestion

of _Barrou_, which he supports by a reference to Porphyrio _ad Hor.

Sat_. 1. 6. 30--Hic Barrus vilisimmae libidinosaeque admodum vitae fuit,

adeo ut Aemiliam virginem Vestae incestasse dictus sit.

[834] Dio Cass. _fr_. 92.

[835] Macrob. _Sat_. i. 10. 5.

[836] Ascon. _in Milonian_. p. 46. Cf. Cic. _de Nat. Deor_. iii. 30.

74.

[837] Scopulus reorum (Val. Max. iii. 7. 9).

[838] Ascon. l.c.

[839] Val. Max. l.c. Cum id vitare beneficio legis Memmiae liceret,

quae eorum, qui rei publicae causa abessent, recipi nomina vetabat.

[840] Val. Max. vi. 8. 1.

[841] Ascon. l.c. Nimia etiam, ut existimatio est, asperitate usus.

[842] Zumpt _Criminalrecht_ i. p. 117.

[843] Plut. _Quaest. Rom_., 83 [Greek: _duo en andras duo de gynaikas en

tae boon agorai legomenae tous men Hellaenas, tous de Galatas, zontas

katorhyxan_].

[844] Plin. _H.N_. xxx. 1. 12 DCLVII demum anno urbis Cn. Cornelia

Lentulo P. Licinio Crasso consulibus (97 B.C.) senatus consultum factum

est ne homo immolaretur.

[845] Plut. l.c.

[846] Obsequens 99 (37) (111 B.C.) Maxima pars urbis exusta cum aede

Matris Magnae; lacte per triduum pluit, hostiisque expiatum majoribus,

Jugurthinum bellum exortum. The war had been determined on the

year before.

[847] Boissière _Esquisse d'une histoire de la conquête et de

l'administration Romaines dans le Nord de l'Afrique_ p. 41.

[848] App. _Lib_. [Greek: _apo Maurousion ton okeanoi mechri taes

Kyraenaion archaes es ta mesogeia_.]

[849] Boissière l.c.

[850] [Greek: _ton legomenon Megalon Pedion_] (App. _Lib_. 68).

[851] Tissot _Géographie comparée de la province Romaine d'Afrique_ ii.

p. 5.

[852] Plin. _H.N_. v. 3. 22; v. 4. 25; Ptol. iv. 3. 7.

[853] Tissot op. cit. ii. pp. 1-20.

[854] Ibid. ii. p. 20.

[855] Mercier _La population indigène de L'Afrique_ pp. 129, 130;

Boissière op. cit. p. 39.

[856] Tissot op. cit. i. pp. 400 foll. For the extension of the native

Libyan language cf. Boissière, _L'Afrique Romaine_ p. 6.

[857] Tissot op. cit. pp. 403, 404.

[858] Hence the [Greek: _Melanogatouloi_] and the [Greek: _Lenkaithiopes_]

of Ptolemy (iv. 6. 5 and 6.) See Tissot op. cit. p. 447.

[859] Mercier op. cit. p. 136.

[860] Tissot op. cit. i. pp. 414-17.

[861] Boissière (op. cit. p. 101) cites an interesting description of

the Kabyle from _Le capitaine Rinn_. In it occur the following

words:--La guerre pour lui (le Kabyle) est une affaire de devoir, de

nécessité, de point d'honneur ou de vengeance; ce n'est jamais ni un

plaisir, ni une distraction, ni même un état normal; il ne la fait

qu'après prévenu son ennemi, et, dans le combat ou après la victoire, il

n'a pas de cruauté inutile.

[862] Tissot op. cit. i. pp. 417-18.

[863] Polyb. xxxvii. 3; Diod. xxxii. 17.

[864] Plin. _H.N_. v. 3 22.

[865] Strabo xvii. 3. 13.

[866] Livy says (xxix. 29) that this was the admitted order of

succession (ita mos apud Numidas est). The brother of a late king was

probably considered to be the most capable successor. An immature son

would be passed over. Cf. Biereye _Res Numidarum et Maurorum_ p. 18.

[867] Liv. _Ep_. 1.; Val. Max. v. 2, ext. 4; Oros. iv. 22.

[868] App. _Lib_. 106.

[869] App. _Hisp_. 67; Sall. _Jug_. 7.

[870] Strabo. xvii. 3. 13; Diod. xxxiv. 35.

[871] Oros. v, 11.

[872] Strabo l.c.

[873] Sall. _Jug_. 65. 1 Morbis confectus et ob eam causam mente paulum

inminuta. We are not told that he was in this condition before Micipsa's

death; but it is perhaps the reason why the king left him only "heir in

remainder" (secundum heredem) to the crown. Another aspirant appears

later on in the person of Massiva son of Gulussa (Sall. _Jug_. 35. i),

but this prince may not have been born, or may have been an infant, at

the time when Jugurtha was recognised as a possible successor. It is

possible that Massiva may have been mentioned as one of the

supplementary heirs in Micipsa's will, although Sallust does not inform

us of the fact.

[874] Sall. _Jug_. 6. 1.

[875] Sall. _Jug_. 6. 2.

[876] Ibid. 7. 6.

[877] Sall. _Jug_. 8. 1.

[878] Ibid. 8. 2.

[879] Sall. _Jug_. 9. 1.

[880] Statimque eum adoptavit et testamento pariter cum filiis heredem

instituit (Ibid. 9. 3).

[881] Ibid. 10.

[882] Sall. _Jug_. 11.

[883] Ibid. 12. 3. The site of Thirmida is unknown.

[884] Sallust, using Roman phraseology, says that he had been "proxumus

lictor Jugurthae" (_l c_.). Such a lictor would stand nearest the

magistrate, receive his immediate orders and be, therefore, presumably a

more trusted and intimate servant.

[885] Sall. _Jug_. 12.

[886] In duas partis discedunt Numidae; plures Adherbalem secuntur, sed

illum alterum bello meliores (Ibid. 13. 1).

[887] Sall. _Jug_. 13. 4.

[888] Ibid. 13. 6.

[889] Ibid. 14.

[890] Sallust (l.c.) makes Adherbal say "Micipsa pater meus moriens

mihi praecepit, ut regni Numidiae tantum modo procurationem existumarem

meam, ceterum jus et imperium ejus penes vos esse". The "jus et

imperium" have no true application to a protectorate.

[891] Sall. _Jug_. 15. 1.

[892] Ibid. 15. 2.

[893] Sall. _Jug_. 16. 2.

[894] Ibid. 16. 3.

[895] Sall. _Jug_. 16. 5.

[896] Sall. _Jug_. 20. 4.

[897] Ibid. 20. 7 Itaque non uti antea cum praedatoria manu, sed magno

exercitu conparato bellum gerere coepit et aperte totius Numidiae

imperium petere.

[898] Ibid. 21. 3.

[899] Sallust says (_Jug_. 21. 2): Haud longe a mari prope Cirtam

oppidum utriusque exercitus consedit. He apparently underestimates the

distance of Cirta from the sea.

[900] Ibid. 21. 2 Ni multitude togatorum fuisset, quae Numidas

insequentis moenibus prohibuit, uno die inter duos reges coeptum atque

patratum bellum foret.

[901] The bridge described by Shaw, constructed on one of the natural

arches which connect the two sides of the river bed and presenting two

ranges of superposed arcades, is no longer in existence. This bridge

attached the south-eastern angle of the town to the heights of Mansoura.

See Tissot _Géographie comparée_ ii. p. 393.

[902] Sall. _Jug_. 21. 3.

[903] Sall. _Jug_. 21. 4 Postquam senatus de bello eorum accepit, tres

adulescentes in Africam legantur, qui ambos reges adeant, senatus

populique Romani verbis nuntient velle et censere eos ab armis

discedere, de controvorsiis suis jure potius quam bello disceptare: ita

seque illisque dignum esse.

[904] Is rumor clemens erat (Ibid. 22. 1).

[905] Adherbalis adpellandi copia non fuit (Ibid. 22. 5).

[906] Si ab jure gentium sese prohibuerit (Sail. _Jug_. 22.4).

[907] Ibid, 23. 2 Adherbal ... intellegit ... penuria rerum

necessariarum bellum trahi non posse.

[908] Sall. _Jug_. 23. 2.

[909] Ibid. 24.

[910] Sall. _Jug_. 25. 1.

[911] Ibid. 25. 3 Ita bonum publicum, ut in plerisque negotiis solet,

privata gratia devictum.

[912] Ibid. 25. 4 Legantur tamen in Africam majores natu nobiles,

amplis honoribus usi.

[913] Cujus ... nutu prope terrarum orbis regebatur (Cic. _pro Font_. 7,

24).

[914] Sall. _Jug_. 25. 6 Primo commotus metu atque lubidine divorsus

agitabatur. Timebat iram senatus, ni paruisset legatis: porro animus

cupidine caecus ad inceptum scelus rapiebatur.

[915] Sall, _Jug_. 25. 10.

[916] Ibid. 25. 11.

[917] Sall. _Jug_. 26. 1 Italici, quorum virtute moenia defensabantur,

confisi deditione facta propter magnitudinem populi Romani inviolatos

sese fore, Adherbali suadent uti seque et oppidum Jugurthae tradat,

tantum ab eo vitam paciscatur: de ceteris senatui curae fore.

[918] Ibid. 26. 3 Jugurtha in primis Adherbalem excruciatum necat.

[919] Sallust (l.c.) represents him as the author of this massacre;

(Jugurtha) omnis puberes Numidas atque negotiatores promiscue, uti

quisque armatus obvius fuerat, interficit. But the attribution may be

due to the brevity of the narrative. The leader of a murderous host may

easily be credited with the outrages which it commits.

[920] Cic. _Brut_. 36. 136 Tum etiam C. L. Memmii fuerunt oratores

mediocres, accusatores acres atque acerbi. Itaque in judicium capitis

multos vocaverunt, pro reis non saepe dixerunt. For his mordant style

see Cic. _de Orat_. ii. 59, 240. The lofty opinion which he was supposed

to hold of himself is illustrated in Cic. _de Orat_. ii. 66, 267 Velut

tu, Crasse, in contione "ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in

forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabianum demitteret".

[921] He was already "vir acer et infestus potentiae nobilitatis" (Sall.

_Jug_. 27. 2).

[922] Ibid. 27. 1.

[923] Ibid. 27. 2.

[924] Sall. _Jug_. 27. 3 Lege Sempronia provinciae futuris consulibus

Numidia atque Italia decretae. Consules declarati P. Scipio Nasica, L.

Bestia: Calpurnio Numidia, Scipioni Italia obvenit.

[925] Jugurtha, contra spem nuntio accepto, quippe cui Romae omnia venum

ire in animo haeserat (Ibid, 28. 1).

[926] Ibid.

[927] Sall. _Jug_. 28. 2.

[928] In consule nostro multae bonaeque artes animi et corporis erant,

quas omnis avaritia praepediebat: patiens laborum, acri ingenio, satis

providens, belli haud ignarus, firmissumus contra pericula et insidias

(Ibid. 28. 5).

[929] Sall. _Jug_. 28. 4 Calpurnius parato exercitu legal sibi homines

nobilis, factiosos, quorum auctoritate quae deliquisset munita

fore sperabat.

[930] Sall. _l. c_.

[931] The only record of this campaign is contained in the few words of

Sallust (Ibid, 28. 7) Acriter Numidiam ingressus est multosque

mortalis et urbis aliquot pugnando cepit.

[932] Possibly not at this time, but the date of its recovery is

unknown. The town is in the hands of Metellus during the closing months

of his campaign (Sall. _Jug_. 81. 2). Cf. p. 431.

[933] Sall. _Jug_. 19. 7 Mauris omnibus rex Bocchus imperitabat, praeter

nomen cetera ignarus populi Romani, itemque nobis neque bello neque pace

antea cognitus. Practically nothing is known of the predecessors of this

king. Livy (xxix. 30) mentions an earlier Baga of Mauretania, and

perhaps this name is identical with that of Bocchus or [Greek: _Bogos_].

See Biereye _Res Numidarum et Maurorum_. For the earlier history of

Mauretania see also Göbel _Die Westküste Afrikas im Altertum_. The

boundaries of the kingdom were the Atlantic and the Muluccha on the west

and east respectively (Liv. xxiv. 49, xxi. 22; Sall. _Jug_. 110). The

southern boundary naturally shifted. At times the Mauretanian kings

ruled over some of the Gaetulian tribes, and Strabo (ii. 3.4) makes the

kingdom extend at one time to tribes akin to the Aethiopians--presumably

to the Atlas range. Elsewhere (xvii. 3. 2) he speaks of it as extending

over the Rif to the Gaetulians. See Göbel op. cit. pp. 79-82.

[934] Ibid. 80. 4 Bocchus initio hujusce belli legatos Romam miserat

foedus et amicitiam petitum.

[935] Sall. _Jug_. 29. 2 Scaurus ... tametsi a principio, plerisque ex

factione ejus conruptis, acerrume regem inpugnaverat, tamen magnitudine

pecuniae a bono honestoque in pravom abstractus est.

[936] Sall. _Jug_. 29. 3.

[937] Ibid. 29. 4 Interea fidei causa mittitur a consule Sextius

quaestor in oppidum Jugurthae Vagam.

[938] Vaga (Bêdja) marks the frontier between the Numidian kingdom and

the Roman province--the frontier created in 172 B.C. by the invasions of

Masinissa and finally fixed in 146 B.C. The town lay on the west of the

Wad Bédja, which joins the Medjerda, and on the right of the road from

Carthage to Bulla Regia. There was another Vaga in the heart of Numidia,

between the Ampsaga and Thabraca. See Tissot _Géographie comparée_

ii. pp. 6, 302; Wilmanns in C.I.L. viii. p. 154.

[939] Long _Decline of the Rom. Republic_ i. p. 400.

[940] Sall. _Jug_, 29, 5 Rex ... pauca praesenti consilio locutus de

invidia fact! sui atque uti in deditionem acciperetur, reliqua cum

Bestia et Scauro secreta transigit.

[941] Ibid. (Rex) quasi per saturam sententiis exquisitis in

deditionem accipitur.

[942] Ibid. 29. 6.

[943] Bestia's presence was necessary at Rome as his colleague Nasica

had died during his tenure of the consulship (Cic. _Brut_. 34. 128).

[944] Sall. _Jug_. 30. I Postquam res in Africa gestas, quoque modo

actae forent fama divolgavit, Romae per omnis locos et conventus de

facto consulis agitari. Apud plebem gravis invidia.

[945] Sall. _Jug_. 30. 1 Patres solliciti erant: probarentne tantum

flagitium an decretum consulis subvorterent parum constabat.

[946] Ibid. 30. 2 Maxume eos potentia Scauri, quod is auctor et socius

Bestiae ferebatur, a vero bonoque inpediebat.

[947] Ibid. 30. 3.

[948] Ibid. 31.

[949] The best manuscripts read _his annis xv_ in Sall, _Jug_ 31. 2, but

xv may be a mistake for xx, which is the reading of some good ones.

Twenty years would carry us back to 131 B.C., approximately the date of

the fall of Tiberius Gracchus. The year 126 B.C. which the reading xv

gives, can hardly be said to mark an epoch in the decline of the

liberties of the people.

[950] Sociis nostris veluti hostibus, hostibus pro sociis utuntur (Sall.

_Jug_. 31. 23).

[951] Metum ab scelere suo ad ignaviam vostram transtulere, quos omnis

eadem cupere, eadem odisse, eadem metuere in unum coegit. Sed haec inter

bonos amicitia, inter malos factio est (Sall_. Jug_. 31. 14.)

[952] Quo facilius indicio regis Scauri et reliquorum, quos pecuniae

captae accersebat (Memmius), delicta patefierent (Ibid. 33. i).

[953] Alii perfugas vendere (Sall, _Jug_, 32.3). Long (_Decline of the

Rom. Rep. i. p_. 406) thinks that this means that they were sold as

slaves. But the words are probably to be brought into connection with

the terms of the Mamilian commission (Sall. _Jug_. 40.1) "qui elephantos

quique perfugas tradidissent". Ihne (_Röm. Gesch. v. p_. 131) seems to

regard these _perfugae_ as Roman subjects who had been handed over

by Jugurtha.

[954] Quoniam se populo Romano dedisset, ne vim quam misericordiam ejus

experiri mallet (Sall. _Jug_. 32. 5).

[955] Sall. _Jug_, 33.7.

[956] Confirmatus ab omnibus, quorum potentia aut scelere cuncta ea

gesserat quae supra diximus (Ibid. 33. 2).

[957] Ibid. 33. 2 (Jugurtha) C. Baebium tribunum plebis magna mercede

parat, cujus inpudentia contra jus et injurias omnis munitus foret.

[958] Sall. _Jug_. 33. 3.

[959] Producto Jugurtha (Ibid, 33. 4) i.e. led him to the front of

the tribunal, or the Rostra if the scene took place in the Forum.

[960] Regem tacere jubet (Sall. _Jug_. 34.1).

[961] Vicit tamen inpudentia (Ibid.).

[962] Ibid. 34. 2.

[963] Sall. _Jug_. 35. 2. It is not impossible that he may have been

mentioned as one of the supplementary heirs in Micipsa's will. See

p. 323.

[964] Sall. _Jug_. 35. 6.

[965] Ibid. 35. 7 Fit reus magis ex aequo bonoque quam ex jure gentium

Bomilcar, comes ejus qui Romam fide publica venerat.

[966] Sall. _Jug_. 35. 9.

[967] Urbem venalem et mature perituram, si emptorem invenerit! (Ibid.

35. 10).

[968] There was still an heir in Gauda--one too who had been recognised

in the testament of Micipsa (p. 323); but he may not have been regarded

as a suitable candidate.

[969] Sall. _Jug_. 36. 1 Albinus renovato bello commeatum, stipendium,

aliaque, quae militibus usui forent, maturat in Africam portare, ac

statim ipse profectus, uti ante comitia, quod tempus haud longe aberat,

armis aut deditione aut quovis modo bellum conficeret.

[970] Cf. Sall. _Jug_. 36. 1 Armis aut deditione aut quovis modo.

[971] Sall. _Jug_. 36. 3 Ac fuere qui tum Albinum haud ignarum consili

regis existumarent, neque ex tanta properantia tam facile tractum bellum

socordia magis quam dolo crederent.

[972] His colleague Quintus Minucius Rufus was making war with the

barbarians of Thrace (Liv. _Ep_. lxv; Vellei. ii. 8; Florus i. 39 (iii.

4); Eutrop. iv. 27).

[973] See cf. Meinel _Zur Chronologie des Jug. Krieges_ p. 11.

[974] Quae dissensio totius anni comitia inpediebat (Sall. _Jug_. 37.

2).

[975] The tribunician year ended with 9th December, but it is not likely

that the consuls of 109, Metellus and Silanus, were elected between this

date and 1st January of 109. Had they been, Metellus would have held

Numidia and Sp. Albinus would not have been allowed to return there.

[976] Sall. _Jug_. 37. 3.

[977] There is little probability that the Calama (Gelma) of Orosius (v.

15) and the Suthul of Sallust are identical. Those who have visited the

site of Gelma deny that Sallust's description suits this region and

think that Suthul was a place near by. Grellois (_Ghelma_ pp. 263 foll.)

thinks that Suthul may be placed on a site where now stands the village

of Henschir Ain Neschma, one hour's distance from Gelma. See Wilmanns in

C.I. L. viii. p. 521.

[978] Sall. _Jug_. 37. 4.

[979] Vineas agere, aggerem jacere, aliaque quae incepto usui forent

properare (Sall. _Jug_. 37. 4).

[980] Sall. _Jug. 38. 9. The treaty perhaps gave to Jugurtha a specific

guarantee of the undisturbed possession of Numidia.

[981] Oros. v. 15.

[982] Sail. _Jug_. 39. 1.

[983] Sallust (_Jug_. 39. 2) improperly calls him _consul_. The only

position which he held now was that of proconsul of Numidia.

[984] Senatus ita uti par fuerat decernit, suo atque populi injussu

nullum potuisse foedus fieri (Sall. _Jug_. 39. 3).

[985] Sall. _Jug_. 39. 4.

[986] Sall. _Jug_. 40. 1.

[987] Occulte per amicos ac maxume per homines nominis Latini et socios

Italicos inpedimenta parabant (Ibid. 40. 2). For the later relations

of the government with the Latins and allies see p. 288.

[988] Sed plebes incredibile memoratu est quam intenta fuerit quantaque

vi rogationem jusserit, magis odio nobilitatis cui mala illa parabantur,

quam cura rei publicae: tanta lubido in partibus erat (Sall. _Jug_.

40. 3).

[989] Ibid. 40. 4.

[990] [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 72; Plut. _Quaest. Rom_. 50.

[991] Sall. _Jug_. 40. 5 Sed quaestio exercita aspere violenterque ex

rumore et lubidine plebis. Ut saepe nobilitatem, sic ea tempestate

plebem ex secundis rebus insolentia ceperat.

[992] Cic. _Brut_. 34. 128 Invidiosa lege Mamilia quaestio C. Galbam

sacerdotem et quattuor consulates, L. Bestiam, C. Catonem, Sp. Albinum

civemque praestantissimum L. Opimium, Gracchi interfectorem, a populo

absolutum, cum is contra populi studium stetisset. Gracchani judices

sustulerunt. For the condemnation of Opimius cf. _pro Sest_. 67, 140;

for that of Galba, _Brut_. 33. 127. Here honour is paid to Galba's

speech in his defence (Extat ejus peroratio, qui epilogus dicitur: qui

tanto in honore pueris nobis erat, ut eum etiam edisceremus). Of Galba

it is said (l.c.) Hic, qui in collegio sacerdotum esset, primus post

Romam conditam judicio publico est condemnatus. He was perhaps a member

of the college of pontiffs (Long _Decline of the Rom. Rep_. i. p. 415).

(For the exile of Cato at Tarraco see _pro Balbo_ 11. 28).

[993] Sall. _Jug_. 43. I; Liv. _Ep_. lxv.

[994] Sallust's language (_Jug_. 43. 1) is indeterminate, but suggests

the use of the lot--Metellus et Silanus consules designati provincias

inter se partiverant, Metelloque Numidia evenerat. There are instances

in later times of a manipulation of the _sortitio_. See Cic. _ad Fam_.

v. 2. 3; _ad Att_. i. 16. 8. This assignment of the provinces followed

the treaty of Aulus (l.c.), i.e. it took place early in 109, but not

in the very first months of that year, as Spurius Albinus had gone back

to Africa as proconsul (p. 373). As we have seen (p. 369) there is no

probability that the consuls of 109 were elected in 110. Sallust's words

(l.c.) "consules designati" simply mean "appointed consuls" and have

no reference to the usual status of "consuls designate".

[995] Polyb. vi. 56.

[996] Cic. _pro Balbo_ 5. 11; _ad Att_. i. 16. 4; Val. Max. ii. 10. 1.

It is supposed that Sicily may have been the province, which he had

governed as propraetor, and from which he had returned when he was

subjected to this trial. See Drumann _Gesch. Roms_. ii. p. 31.

[997] Acri viro et, quamquam advorso populi partium, fama tamen

aequabili et inviolata (Sall. _Jug_. 43. 1).

[998] Ibid. 43. 4.

[999] Sall. _Jug_. 44. Cf. Val. Max. ii. 7. 2; Frontin. _Strat_.

iv. 1. 2.

[1000] Sed in ea difficultate Metellum non minus quam in rebus

hostilibus magnum et sapientem virum fuisse conperior: tanta temperantia

inter ambitionem saevitiamque moderatum.... Ita prohibendo a delictis

magis quam vindicando exercitum brevi confirmavit (Sall. _Jug_. 45).

[1001] Sall. _Jug_. 46. 1.

[1002] Jugurtha ... diffidere suis rebus ac tum demum veram deditionem

facere conatus est (Ibid.).

[1003] Sall. _Jug_. 46. 2.

[1004] Sed Metello jam antea experimentis cognitum erat genus Numidarum

infidum, ingenio mobili, novarum rerum avidum esse (Ibid. 46. 3).

[1005] Sall. _Jug_. 46. 5.

[1006] Sall. _Jug_. 47. 1 Oppidum Numidarum nomine Vaga, forum rerum

venalium totius regni maxume celebratum, ubi et incolere et mercari

consueverant Italici generis multi mortales. Sallust does not say that

Italian merchants were still in the town. Their presence in Numidian

cities since the massacre at Cirta may be doubted, although the fact

that the town was so near the province may have mastered the fears of

some of the traders.

[1007] Sall. _Jug_. 47. 4.

[1008] Ibid. 48. 1 Coactus rerum necessitudine statuit armis certare.

[1009] Tissot _Géographie comparée_ 1. pp. 67-68. I have followed Tissot

in his identification of the Muthul with the Wäd Mellag. This view makes

Metellus's efforts concentrate for the time on S.E. Numidia. He intended

to secure his communications before proceeding farther, whether south or

west. The older view, which identified the Muthul with the Ubus (Mannert

and Forbiger) would represent Metellus as opening his campaign in the

direction of Hippo Regius--Western Numidia would thus be his object and

the subsequent campaign about Zama would indicate a change of plan. This

is not an impossible view; but there are other indications which favour

the hypothesis that the Muthul is the Wäd Mellag. One is that Sicca in

its neighbourhood veered round to the Romans after the battle (Sall.

_Jug_. 56. 3). The other is the alleged suitability of this region to

the topographical description given by Sallust. Tissot believed that

every step in the great battle could be traced on the ground. The "mons

tractu pari" is the Djebel Hemeur mta Ouargha, parallel to the course of

the Wäd Mellag and extending from the Djebel Sara to the Wäd Zouatin.

The hill projected by this chain perpendicularly to the river is the

Koudiat Abd Allah, which detaches itself from the central block of the

Djebel Hemeur and the direction of which is perpendicular both to the

mountain and to the Wäd Mellag. The plain, waterless and desert in the

angle formed by the hill and the mountain but inhabited and cultivated

in the neighbourhood of the Muthul, is the Fëid-es-Smar, watered in its

lower part by two streams which empty into the Wäd Mellag. The distance,

however, which separates Djebel Hemeur from the left bank of the Wäd

Mellag, is not twenty (the number given by the MSS. of Sallust) but

about seven miles. S. Reinach in his edition of Tissot has not

reproduced the author's own sketch of the battle of the Muthul, but a

map of the district will be found in the Atlas appended to the work (Map

xviii., Medjerda supérieure). This map forms the basis of the one which

I have given.

[1010] See note 1. One must agree with Tissot that the "ferme milia

passuum viginti" of Sallust (_Jug_. 48. 3) cannot be accepted. Such a

distance is impossible from a strategic point of view, as Metellus could

never have sent his vanguard such a distance in advance, when he himself

was engaged with the enemy. It is also inconsistent with the account of

the battle, the details of which obviously show that it took place in a

much smaller area. The actual distance between the conjectured sites is

about seven Roman miles (note 1. See Tissot op. cit. i. p. 71).

[1011] Sall. _Jug_. 48.

[1012] This appears from the narrative in Ibid. 52. 5. Even when

Jugurtha had advanced some distance to the river, Bomilcar was not

actually in touch with the king's forces.

[1013] Sall. _Jug_. 49. 4.

[1014] Sall. _Jug_. 49. 4.

[1015] Ibid. 49. 6 Ibi conmutatis ordinibus in dextero latere, quod

proxumum hostis erat, triplicibus subsidies aciem instruxit.

[1016] Sall. _Jug_. 49. 6 Sicuti instruxerat, transvorsis principiis in

planum deducit. The word "transvorsis" here probably refers to the

direction in which the front rank faced the enemy, and the position may

be described in another way by saying that Metellus marched with his

front rank sideways to Jugurtha. See Summers in loc.

[1017] Ibid. 50. 2.

[1018] Ibid. 50. 1.

[1019] Sall. _Jug_. 52. 5.

[1020] Ibid. 50. 2.

[1021] Sall. _Jug_. 51. 3.

[1022] Sall. _Jug_. 52.5.

[1023] Aciem quam diffidens virtuti militum arte statuerat, quo hostium

itineri officeret, latius porrigit eoque modo ad Rutili castra procedit

(Ibid. 52. 6).

[1024] Sall. _Jug_. 53. 3.

[1025] Ibid. 53. 5 Instructi intentique obviam procedunt. Nam dolus

Numidarum nihil languidi neque remissi patiebatur.

[1026] Pro victoria satis jam pugnatum, reliquos labores pro praeda fore

(Sall. _Jug_. 54. 1).

[1027] Interim Romae gaudium ingens ortum cognitis Metelli rebus, ut

seque et exercitum more majorum gereret, in advorso loco victor tamen

virtute fuisset, hostium agro potiretur, Jugurtham magnificum ex Albini

socordia spem salutis in solitudine aut fuga coegisset habere

(Ibid. 55. 1).

[1028] Sall. _Jug_. 54. 1.

[1029] Ibid. 54. 3.

[1030] Metellus, ubi videt ... minore detrimento illos vinci quam suos

vincere, statuit non proeliis neque in acie, sed alio more bellum

gerundum (Ibid. 54. 5).

[1031] Sall. _Jug_. 54. 6.

[1032] Sall. _Jug_. 55. 5.

[1033] Sicca is the modern El Kef, but is still called by its

inhabitants by its old name of Sicca Veneria (Schak Benar), The name

_Veneria_ was derived from a temple of the Punic Aphrodite (cf. Val.

Max. ii. 6. 15). Of its strategic importance Tissot says "El Kef is

still regarded as the strongest place in Tunis.... The town dominates

the great plains of Es-sers, Zanfour, Lorbeus and of the Wäd Mellag, at

the same time that it commands one of the principal ways of

communication leading from Tunis to Algiers." See Wilmanns in C.I.L.

viii. p. 197; Tissot _Géogr. comp_. ii. p. 378. Zama Regia is now

identified, not with the place called Lehs, El-Lehs or Eliès (Wilmanns

op. cit. p. 210), but with Djiâma. See Tissot op. cit. ii. pp. 571,

577-79; Mommsen in _Hermes_ xx. pp. 144-56; Schmidt in _Rhein. Mus_.

1889 (N. F. 44) pp. 397 foll.

[1034] Sall. _Jug_. 56. 3.

[1035] Ibid. 56. 2.

[1036] Id oppidum in campo situm magis opere quam natura munitum erat

(Ibid. 57. 1).

[1037] Contra ea oppidani in proxumos saxa volvere, sudes, pila,

praeterea picem sulphure et taeda mixtam ardentia mittere (Sall. _Jug_.

57. 5). If _ardentia_ is correct, the _sudes_ and _pila_ must also have

been winged with fire. I have interpreted the passage as though

_ardenti_ (suggested by Herzog) were the true reading. Summers suggests

"picem sulphure mixtam et tela ardentia."

[1038] Ibid. 58. 1.

[1039] Sall. _Jug_. 59. 1.

[1040] Ibid. 59. 3.

[1041] Sall. _Jug_. 60. 4.

[1042] Ibid. 61. 1.

[1043] Sall. _Jug_. 61. 4.

[1044] Sall. _Jug_. 62, 1.

[1045] Mittuntur ad imperatorem legati, qui Jugurtham imperata facturum

dice rent (Ibid. 62. 3). The word _imperata_ implies previous

negotiations.

[1046] Metellus proper cantos senatorial ordinis ex Hibernia accurse

jubet; eorum et variorum, quos ironers defeat, console habet

(Ibid. 62. 4).

[1047] Ihne _Röm. Gesch_. v. p. 146.

[1048] Sall. _Jug_. 62. 5. Orosius (v. 15. 7) adds that Jugurtha

promised corn and other supplies.

[1049] Oros. l.c.

[1050] Sall. _Jug_. 62. 7.

[1051] Oros. l.c.

[1052] App. _Num_. 3.

[1053] Its site is unknown.

[1054] Romae senatus de provinciis consults Numidiam Metello decelerare

(Sall. _Jug_. 62. 10). It is possible that the senate merely abstained

from making Numidia a consular province. See Summers in loc. and cf.

p. 222.

[1055] Etiam tum alios magistratus plebs, consulate nobilities inter se

per manus trade bat. Novas memo tam claries neque tam egregious facts

erat, quin is indigenous illo honore et quasi pollutes aerator

(Ibid. 63. 6).

[1056] Ibid. 63. 1.

[1057] Sall. _Jug_. 64. 4.

[1058] Milites quibus in Hibernia preheat lax ore imperio quam antea

habere (Ibid. 64. 5).

[1059] Sall. _Jug_. 64. 5.

[1060] Ibid. 65. 1 Erat praeterea in exercitu nostro Unmade quidam

nomine Gauda, Mastanabalis filius, Masinissae nepos, quem Micipsa

testamento secundum heredem scripserat, morbis confectus et ob eam

causam mente paulum inminuta.

[1061] Turmam equitum Romanorum (Ibid. 65. 2). It appears, therefore,

that _equites equo publico_, although seldom (if ever) used as cavalry

at this time, still formed the escort of generals or princes.

[1062] Equites Romanos, milites et negotiatores (Sall. _Jug_. 65. 4).

[1063] Sall. _Jug_. 66. 3.

[1064] Ibid. 67.

[1065] Sall. _Jug_. 67. 3 Turpilius praefectus unus ex omnibus Italicis

intactus profugit. Id misericordiane hospitis an pactione an casu ita

evenerit, parum comperimus: nisi, quia illi in tanto malo turpis vita

integra fama potior fuit, inprobus intestabilisque videtur.

[1066] Ibid. 68. 1.

[1067] Ibid. 68. 4 Equites in primo late, pedites quam artissume ire

et signa occultare jubet.

[1068] Plut. _Mar_. 8 outos gar ho anaer aen men ek poteron xenos toi

Metello kai tote taen epi ton tektonon echon archaen synestrateue.

[1069] Plut. l.c.

[1070] Plut. l.c.

[1071] Sall. _Jug_. 69. 4 Turpilius ... condemnatus verberatusque capite

poenas solvit: nam is civis e Latio erat. If the last words mean that

Turpilius was a Latin, they may show that the law of Drusus (p. 242), if

passed, was no longer respected. If they mean that he was a Roman

citizen from a Latin town, they illustrate this law. Appian (_Num_. 3)

says that Turpilius was a Roman ([Greek: _andra Rhomaion_]).

[1072] Sall. _Jug_. 70.

[1073] Proinde reputaret cum animo suo, praemia an cruciatum mallet

(Sall. _Jug_. 70. 6).

[1074] Sall. _Jug_. 72.

[1075] Ibid. 73.

[1076] Meinel (_Zur Chronologie des Jugurth. Krieges p. 13_) thinks that

the consular elections of 108 did not take place before the winter, and

that they may even have drifted over into the following year.

[1077] Plut, _Mar_. 8.

[1078] Plut. l.c. It is possible that this story and that of Sallust

(_Jug_. 63 see p. 410) about the sacrifice at Utica belong to the same

incident. But it is not probable. A man such as Marius would often

approach a favourite shrine.

[1079] Liv. _Ep_. lxv.

[1080] [Victor] _de Vir. Ill_. 72; Ammian. xxvii. 3. 9.

[1081] The _via Aemilia_ ([Victor] l.c.; Strabo v. 1. 11).

[1082] Plut. _Quaest. Rom_. 50.

[1083] Plut. _Mar_. 8.

[1084] Sall. _Jug_. 73. 6 Denique plebes sic accensa, uti opifices

agrestesque omnes, quorum res fidesque in manibus sitae erant, relictis

operibus frequentarent Marium et sua necessaria post illius honorem

ducerent. The labours, from which the _agrestes_ were drawn, may have

been those of early spring, if the elections were delayed until the

early part of 107 B.C. (See p. 420, Meinel l.c.)

[1085] Ibid. 73. 7 Sed paulo _ante senatus Metello Numidiam_

decreverat: ea res frustra fuit. The words in italics are not given by

the good manuscripts; they are perhaps an interpolation drawn from ch.

62. See Summers in loc. It is possible that some mention of the

provinces which the senate had decreed to the new consuls stood here.

Mommsen (_Hist. of Rome_ bk. iv. c. 4) thinks that the passage may have

contained a statement that the senate had destined Gaul and Italy for

the consuls.

[1086] Sall. _Fug_. 85.

[1087] Ibid. 85. 12 Atque ego scio, Quirites, qui, postquam consules

facti sunt, et acta majorum et Graecorum militaria praecepta legere

coeperint--praeposteri homines: nam gerere quam fieri tempore posterius,

re atque usu prius est.

[1088] Ibid. 84. 2.

[1089] Polyb. vi. 19.2.

[1090] According to Gellius (xvi. 10, 10) 375 asses:--Qui ... nullo aut

perquam parvo aere censebantur, "capite censi" vocabantur, extremus

autem census capite censorum aeris fuit trecentis septuaginta quinque.

But this decline from the Polybian census seems incredibly rapid.

Perhaps the figure should be 3,750--one closely resembling that given by

Polybius. Cf. p. 61.

[1091] Cf. Liv. x. 21 (cited by Ihne _Röm. Gesch_. v. p. 154)

Senatus ... delectum omnis generis hominum haberi jussit. See also Gell.

l.c. 13. Polybius vi. 19. 3, according to Casaubon's reading (p. 135),

cannot be cited in illustration of this point.

[1092] Sall. _Jug_. 86 2 Ipse interea milites scribere, non more majorum

neque ex classibus, sed uti cujusque lubido erat, capite censos

plerosque. Val. Max. ii. 3. 1 Fastidiosum dilectus genus in exercitibus

Romanis oblitterandum duxit. Cf. Florus i. 36 (iii. 1). 13. The

tradition preserved by Plutarch (_Mar. 9_) that Marius enrolled slaves

as well ([Greek: _polyn ton aporon kai doulon katagraphon_]), is

apparently an echo from the time of the civil wars. Plutarch may mean

men of servile birth and, though it is noted that freedmen were not

employed even on occasional service until 90 B.C. (App. _Bell. Civ_. i.

49), yet it is possible that Marius's hasty levy may have swept in some

men of this standing. But after, as before the time of Marius,

free-birth (_ingenuitas_) continued to be a necessary qualification for

service in the legions.

[1093] Sall. _Jug_. 86. 3.

[1094] Sall. _Jug_. 86. 3.

[1095] Sall. _Jug_. 74. 1.

[1096] Ibid. 74. 2.

[1097] Ibid. 75. 1. There are two Thalas in Numidia. The one with

which we are here concerned is believed to be that lying east of Capsa

(Khafsa), not that near Ammaedara (the latter is probably the Thala of

Tac. _Ann_. iii. 21). Its identification was due to Pelissier who

visited the site. It has one of the characteristics mentioned by

Sallust, for the existing ruins are situated in a region destitute of

water except for one neighbouring fountain. The river from which the

Romans drew water and filled their vessels might be the one now called

the Wäd Lebem or Leben--the only one in this part of Tunis which does

not run dry even in summer. The ruins are of small extent and

unimposing, but this feature agrees with the statement of Strabo (xvii.

3. 12) that Thala was one of the towns blotted out by continuous wars in

Africa. It was, therefore, not restored by the Romans. It has been

doubted whether the name Thala is a proof of the identity of the site

with that described by Sallust, since Pelissier says (_Rev. Arch_. 1847,

p. 399) that the place is surrounded by a grove of trees, of the kind

known as _mimosa gummifera_ and called _thala_ by the Arabs. The ruins

may have drawn their name from these trees. See Wilmanns in C.I.L.

viii. p. 28 and cf. Tissot _Géogr. comp_. ii. p. 635.

[1098] Sall. _Jug_. 75. 9.

[1099] Sall. _Jug_. 76. 3 Deinde locis ex copia maxume idoneis vineas

agere, aggerem jacere et super aggerem inpositis turribus opus et

administros tutari.

[1102] The name appears on coins in Punic letters as L B Q I (Movers

_Die Phönizer_ II 2. p. 486; Müller _Numismatique de l'Afrique_ II p.

10). Greek writers also call it Neapolis, probably because it was not

far from an older town at the mouth of the Cinyps (the Wäd

Mghar-el-Ghrin), although others hold that this name designated a

particular quarter of the town. The three cities of the Syrtis--Sabrata,

Oea and Leptis--were called Tripolis, but do not seem to have been

politically connected with one another. Leptis had been stipendiary to

Carthage (Liv. xxxiv. 62) and had subsequently been occupied by

Masinissa (Liv. l.c.; cf. App. _Lib_. 106). But the occupation was

not permanent or effective. Sallust notes (_Jug_. 78) that its situation

had enabled it to escape Numidian influence.

[1101] Sall. _Jug_. 77. 3.

[1102] Ibid. 80. 1.

[1103] Forbiger _Handb. der alt. Geogr_. ii. p. 885.

[1104] Sall. _Jug_. 80. 2.

[1105] Ibid. 80. 1.

[1106] Ibid. 80. 6 Ea necessitudo apud Numidas Maurosque levis

ducitur, quia singuli pro opibus quisque quam plurumas uxores, denas

alii, alii pluris habent, sed reges eo amplius. Ita animus multitudine

distrahitur: nulla pro socia optinet, pariter omnes viles sunt.

[1107] Sall. _Jug_. 81. 1.

[1108] Ibid. 82. 1.

[1109] Cf. p. 349.

[1110] Sall. _Jug_. 81. 2.

[1111] Ibid. 82. 1.

[1112] Ibid. 82. 2.

[1113] Sall. _Jug_. 83. 1.

[1114] Sall, _Jug_. 86. 5.

[1115] Ibid. 88. 1.

[1116] Vellei. ii. II Metelli ... et triumphus fuit clarissimus et

meritum ex virtute ei cognomen Numidici inditum. Cf. Eutrop. iv. 27.

[1117] Sall. _Jug_. 88. 5.

[1118] Sall. _Jug_. 88. 3.

[1119] Sallust uses the historic infinitive (Ibid, 89. 1 Consul, uti

statuerat, oppida castellaque munita adire, partim vi, alia metu aut

praemia ostentando avortere ab hostibus), but the reduction of some of

these places may perhaps be assumed.

[1120] Cf. p. 426.

[1121] Capsa (Kafsa or Gafsa) may have been once subject to Carthage and

have been added to the kingdom of Masinissa after the Hannibalic war.

Strabo (xvii. 3. 12) mentions it amongst the ruined towns of Africa, but

it revived later on, received a Latin form of constitution under

Hadrian, and was ultimately the seat of a bishopric. See Wilmanns in C.

I. L. viii. p. 22. Its commercial importance was very great. It was, as

Tissot says (_Géogr. comp_. ii. p. 664), placed on the threshold of the

desert at the head of the three great valleys which lead, the one to the

bottom of the Gulf of Kabes, the other to Tebessa, the third to the

centre of the regency of Tunis. He describes it as one of the gates of

the Sahara and one of the keys of Tell, the necessary point of transit

of the caravans of the Soudan and the advanced post of the high plateau

against the incursions of the nomads. Strabo (l.c.) describes Capsa as

a treasure-house of Jugurtha, but it has been questioned whether this

description is not due to a confusion with Thala (Wilmanns l.c.).

[1122] Sall. _Jug_. 89. 6.

[1123] Ibid. 89. 5 Nam, praeter oppido propinqua, alia omnia vasta,

inculta, egentia aquae, infesta serpentibus, quarum vis sicuti omnium

ferarum inopia cibi acrior. Ad hoc natura serpentium, ipsa perniciosa,

siti magis quam alia re accenditur. Tissot says (op. cit. ii. p. 669)

that the solitudes which surround the oasis make a veritable "belt of

sands and snakes" (cf. Florus iii. 1. 14 Anguibus harenisque

vallatam).

[1124] Sal. _Jug_. 90. 1.

[1125] Aulus Manlius was sent with some light cohorts to protect the

stores at Lares (Ibid. 90. 2). These stores were, therefore, not

exhausted.

[1126] The Tana has often been identified with the Wäd Tina, but this

identification would take Marius along the coast by Thenae--a course

which he almost certainly did not follow. Tissot holds (_Géogr. comp_.

i. p. 85) that Tana is only a generic Libyan name for a water-course. He

thinks that the river in question is the Wäd-ed-Derb. (Ibid. p. 86).

[1127] This _locus tumulosus_ (Sall. _Jug_. 91. 3) is identified by

Tissot (op. cit. ii. p 669) with a spur of the Djebel Beni-Younès

which dominates Kafsa on the northeast at the distance indicated

by Sallust.

[1128] Ibid. 91. 7.

[1129] Sall. _Jug_. 92. 3.

[1130] Sallust omits all mention of these winter quarters. Such an

omission does not prove that he is a bad military historian, but simply

that he never meant his sketch to be a military history. But he has

perhaps freed himself too completely from the annalistic methods of most

Roman historians.

[1131] Sall. _Jug_. 92. 2.

[1132] The Wäd Muluja. It is called Muluccha by Sallust, [Greek:

_Molochath_] by Strabo (xvii. 3, 9). Other names given to it by

ancient authorities are Malvane, [Greek: _Maloua_], Malva. See Göbel

_Die Westküste Afrikas im Altertum_ pp. 79, 80.

[1133] Bocchus, however, claimed the territory within which Marius was

operating (Sall. _Jug_. 102).

[1134] Ibid. 92. 5.

[1135] Ibid. 93.

[1136] Sall. _Jug_. 94. 3.

[1137] Sall. _Jug_. 95. 1.

[1138] Sall, _Jug_. 95. 1 L. Sulla quaestor cum magno equitatu in castra

venit, quos uti ex Latio et a sociis cogeret Romae relictus erat.

[1139] Cic. _in Verr_. iii. 58. 134.

[1140] Cf. Cic. _ad Att_. vi. 6. 3 and 4.

[1141] Val. Max. vi. 9. 6 C. Marius consul moleste tulisse traditur quod

sibi asperrimum in Africa bellum gerenti tam delicatus quaestor sorte

obvenisset.

[1142] Plut. _Sulla_ 2.

[1143] Val. Max. l.c.; Plut. _Sulla_ 2.

[1144] Litteris Graecis atque Latinis juxta, atque doctissume, eruditus

(Sall. _Jug_. 95. 3).

[1145] Plut. l.c.

[1146] Plut. l.c.

[1147] He was born in 138 B.C. He was entering on his sixtieth year at

the time of his death in 78 B.C. (Val. Max. ix. 3. 8). Cf. Vellei. ii.

17 and see Lau _Lucius Cornelius Sulla_ p. 25.

[1148] Sall. _Jug_. 96.

[1149] Sall. _Jug_. 97. 2.

[1150] Sallust states later that Cirta was his original aim (Ibid. 102.

1 Pervenit in oppidum Cirtam, quo initio profectus intenderat); but

Marius's plans may have been modified by intervening events.

[1151] Vix decuma parte die reliqua (Ibid. 97. 3).

[1152] Sall, _Jug_. 98. 1.

[1153] Ibid. 97. 5 Denique Romani ... orbis facere, atque ita ab

omnibus partibus simul tecti et instructi hostium vim sustentabant.

[1154] Ibid. 98. 3.

[1155] Sall. _Jug_. 99. 1.

[1156] Pariter atque in conspectu hostium quadrato agmine incedere

(Ibid. 100. 1). For the nature and growth of this tactical formation

amongst the Romans see Marquardt _Staatsverw. ii. p. 423.

[1157] Sall. _Jug_. 101. 2.

[1158] It is possible that Jugurtha intentionally let his approach be

known, so that the Romans might form in their usual battle order.

[1159] This force is not mentioned by Sallust (Sall. _Jug_. 101. 5), but

it seems implied in the junction of Bocchus with Volux.

[1160] Quod ubi milites accepere, magis atrocitate rei quam fide nuntii

terrentur (Ibid. 101. 7).

[1161] Sall. _Jug_. 101. 9.

[1162] Oros. v. 15. 9 foll. This account in Orosius corresponds to

nothing in Sallust and is clearly drawn from other sources. The attempt

of the Romans to storm Cirta (Section 10) must be a mistake, unless it

refers to some earlier and unrecorded operation of the war. Some details

of Section 14 bear a shadowy resemblance to points in the first of the

recent battles described by Sallust; but there are other details which

make the identification impossible.

[1163] Hastilia telorum, quae manu intorquere sine ammentis solent

(Oros. v. 15. 16).

[1164] According to Sallust (_Jug_. 102. 2.); but the fight which he

describes may not have been the final battle. See p. 452.

[1165] Ibid. 102. 2.

[1166] Sall. _Jug_. 102. 5.

[1167] Ibid. 102. 12.

[1168] Cf. Sall. _Jug_. 80. 4. See p. 349.

[1169] Sall. _Jug_. 102. 15.

[1170] The headquarters were doubtless Cirta, to which we find Marius

returning (Ibid. 104. 1); but shortly afterwards we find Sulla and the

envoys coming to Cirta from a place which, according to one reading, is

called Tucca (see p. 457). All the troops were probably not concentrated

at Cirta, as Marius meant to quarter them in the coast-towns

(Ibid. 100. 1).

[1171] Ibid. 103. 2.

[1172] Sall. _Jug_. 104. 3.

[1173] Ibid. 103. 7.

[1174] Sulla and the envoys were now at a place which variant readings

make either Tucca or Utica (Ibid. 104. 1 Illosque et Sullam [ab Tucca

_or_ Utica] venire jubet, item L. Bellienum praetorem Utica). Utica is

rendered improbable by its mention a few words later, although it is

possible that the name of this town has been duplicated in the sentence.

If we keep Tucca, it cannot be Thugga (Dugga) in Numidia, which is some

distance from the coast. It may be the town which Pliny (_Hist. Nat_. v.

2. 21) calls "oppidum Tucca inpositum mari et flumini Ampsagae".

[1175] It is possible that this armistice included Jugurtha as well,

although this is not stated by Sallust (Sall. _Jug_. 104. 2).

[1176] Ibid. 104. 5.

[1177] Sall. _Jug_. 105. 1.

[1178] Ibid. 106. 2.

[1179] Sall. _Jug_. 107, 1.

[1180] Sall. _Jug_. 107. 6. Cf. Plut. _Sulla_ 3.

[1181] Ibid. 108.

[1182] This is apparently the meaning of Sallust (Ibid. 108. 1) when

he describes Dabar as Massugradae filius, ex gente Masinissae, ceterum

materno genere inpar (nam pater ejus ex concubina ortus erat).

[1183] Sall. _Jug_. 108. 3 Sed ego conperior Bocchum magis Punica fide

quam ob ea, quae praedicabat, simul Romanos et Numidam spe pacis

attinuisse, multumque cum animo suo volvere solitum, Jugurtham Romanis

an illi Sullam traderet; lubidinem advorsum nos, metum pro

nobis suasisse.

[1184] Ibid. 109, 2 Dicit se missum a consule. Marius was really

proconsul.

[1185] Ibid. 110.

[1186] Sall. _Jug_. 111.

[1187] Sall. _Jug_. 111. 2

[1188] Ibid. 112. 1.

[1189] Haec Maurus secum ipse diu volvens tandem promisit, ceterum dolo

an vere cunctatus parum comperimus (Ibid. 113. 1).

[1190] This must have been the agreement, although Sallust says only

Eodem Numida cum plerisque necessariis inermis, uti dictum erat, adcedit

(Sall. _Jug_. 113. 6).

[1191] Ibid. 114. 3.

[1192] Gauda is called king in an inscription which gives the whole

house of Juba II. The inscription (C.I.L. II. n. 3417) runs:--Regi

Jubae reg(is) Jubae filio regi(s) Iempsalis n. regis Gau(dae) pronepoti

regis Masiniss(ae) pronepotis nepoti IIvir quinq. patrono coloni (the

_coloni_, who set up the inscription, having made Juba II IIvir

quinquennalis _honoris causa_). The only doubt which affects the belief

in Gauda's succession arises from a passage in Cic. _post Red. ad Quir_.

8. 20. Cicero here says (Marius) cum parva navicula pervectus in

Africam, quibus regna ipse dederat, ad eos inops supplexque venisset.

There can be no doubt that Marius fled to Hiempsal, not to Gauda. But it

has been pointed out that Cicero's expression is "ad eos," not "ad eum."

The plural probably refers to the whole "domus" of the monarch and would

include both Gauda and Hiempsal. See Biereye _Res Numidarum et

Maurorum_ p. 7.

[1193] Mauretania subsequently includes the region of Caesariensis, but

it has been thought probable that the territory of Sitifis on the east

was not added until the new settlement in 46 B.C. (Mommsen _Hist. of

Rome_ bk. iv. c. 4). The territory between the Muluccha and Saldae

might, therefore, have been added after the close of the war with

Jugurtha. See Müller _Numismatique de l'Afrique_. p. 4; Mommsen l.c.;

Göbel _Die Westküste Afrikas im Altertum_ p. 93; Biereye op. cit. p. 6.

It is very questionable whether the limits of the Roman province were

in any way extended at the expense of Numidia. Such additions as Vaga

and Sicca probably belong to the settlement of 46 B.C. See Tissot

_Géogr. comp_. ii. pp. 21 foll. It has sometimes been thought that the

attachment of Leptis Magna to Rome (p. 429) was permanent (Wilmanns in

C.I.L. viii. p. 2) and that Tripolis became a part of the Roman

province (Marquardt _Staatsverw_. i. p. 465), but Tissot (op. cit. ii.

p. 22) believes that Leptis remained a free city.

[1194] Sall. _Jug_. 114. 3; Liv. _Ep_. lxvii; C.I.L. i. n. xxxiii p. 290

Eum (Jugurtham) cepit et triumphans in secundo consulatu ante currum

suum duci jussit ... veste triumphali calceis patriciis [? _in senatum

venit_]. It is questionable, however, whether the last words of this

Arretine inscription (words which do not immediately follow the account

of the Numidian triumph) can be brought into connection with the story

told by Plutarch (_Mar_. 12) that Marius, either through forgetfulness

or clumsiness, entered the senate in his triumphal dress. They seem to

refer to some special honours conferred after the defeat of the Germanic

tribes. It is possible that the conferment of this honour gave rise to

the malicious story, which became not only distorted but misplaced.

[1195] Plut. _Mar_. 12.

[1196] Ihne _Röm. Gesch_. v. p. 164 Wo dem Sohn des Südens der

Schmerzenschrei entfuhr.

[1197] Plut. _Mar_. 12. The epitomator of Livy (lxvii.) says in carcere

necatus est. The word _necatus_ is quite consistent with a death such as

that described by Plutarch. See Festus, pp. 162, 178.

[1198] Plut. l.c.

[1199] Plut. _Mar_. 10.

[1200] Plut. _Sulla_ 4.

[1201] Plut. _Mar_. 10; _Sulla_ 3.

[1202] Plut. _Sulla_ 6.

[1203] Ancient writers derive the name from _serere_ and connect it with

a story of the family of the Reguli (Plin. _Hist. Nat_. xviii. 3, 20;

Verg. _Aen_. vi. 844; Val. Max. iv. 4. 5). But the name appears on coins

as "Saranus" (Eckhel v. p. 146). It seems, however, to be true that the

name was borne by, or applied to, C. Atilius Regulus, the consul of 257

B.C. See Klebs in Pauly-Wissowa R. E. p. 2095.

[1204] Cic. _pro Planc_. 5. 12.

[1205] In the movement connected with the proceedings of Saturninus in

100 B.C. (Cic. _pro Rab_. 7. 21).

[1206] Eutrop. iv. 27; Val. Max. vi. 9. 13; _Fast. triumph_.

[1207] Yet no very recent cases _repetundarum_ are known. The last seems

to have been the accusation of M. Valerius Messala (Gell. xv. 14). About

this time C. Flavius Fimbria was accused by M. Gratidius and acquitted

in spite of the hostile evidence of M. Aemilius Scaurus (Cic. _pro

Font_. 11. 24; _Brut_. 45. 168; Val. Max. viii. 5. 2; Rein

_Criminalrecht_ p. 649); but even if, with Rein, we assign this case to

106 and not to a time later than Fimbria's consulship, the judiciary law

must have been prepared before the trial.

[1208] Cassiodor. _Chron_. Per Servilium Caepionem consulem judicia

equitibus et senatoribus communicata. Obsequens 101 (39) Per Caepionem

cos. senatorum et equitum judicia communicata.

[1209] Tac. _Ann_. xii. 60 Cum ... Serviliae leges senatui judicia

redderent.

[1210] Cic. _de Inv_. i. 49. 92 Offensum est quod corum qui audiunt

voluntatem laedit: ut si quis apud equites Romanos cupidos judicandi

Caepionis legem judiciariam laudet.

[1211] Pp. 135, 213.

[1212] Cic. _Brut_. 43, 161; _pro Cluent_. 51, 140.

[1213] Cic. _de Or_. ii. 59. 240, 66. 264. It is very probable that this

attack on Memmius belongs to the speech on the Servilian law.

[1214] Cic. _Brut_. 44. 164 Mihi (Ciceroni) quidem a pueritia quasi

magistra fuit, inquam, illa in legem Caepionis oratio.

[1215] Cassiod. _Chron_.; Obsequens 101 (39) (quoted p, 478).

[1216] Cicero, speaking in 70 B.C., says that the Equites had held the

courts for nearly fifty years, i.e. up to the date of the _lex

Cornelia_ of 81 B.C. (Cic. _in Verr_. Act. i. 13. 38).

[1217] [Cic.] _ad Herenn_. i. 15, 25, iv. 24. 34; _de Rep_. i. 3. 6;

_pro Balbo_ II. 28.

[1218] Cic. _de Orat_. iii. 8. 29; _Brut_. 35. 132.

[1219] Cicero, in speaking of the successive defeats of Catulus at the

polls, says Praeposuisse (populum Romanum) Q. Catulo, summa in familia

nato, sapientissimo et sanctissimo viro, non dico C. Serranum,

stultissimum hominem, (fuit enim tamen nobilis,) non C. Fimbriam, novum

hominem, (fuit enim et animi satis magni et consilii,) sed Cn. Mallium,

non solum ignobilem, verum sine virtute, sine ingenio, vita etiam

contempta ac sordida (_pro Planc_. 5. 12).

[1220] Val. Max. ii. 3. 2. The changes introduced into the military

system by Rutilius will be explained in the next chapter.

[1221] Ulp. in _Dig_. xxxviii. 2, i. i. Mommsen (_Staatsr_. iii. p. 433)

thinks that the consul of 105 is the "praetor Rutilius" of

Ulpian's account.

[1222] Gaius iv, 35 (Praetor Publius Rutilius), qui et bonorum

venditionem introduxisse dicitur. See Bethmann-Hollweg _Civilprozess_

ii. p. 671. Here again the consul of 105 is probably meant.

[1223] Cic. _Brut_. 30. 113, 114.

[1224] The disaster at Arausio took place on 6th October (Plut. _Luc_.

27). The consuls for the next year may not yet have been elected, as

there was at this time no fixed date for the consular Comitia. Cf.

p. 364 and see Sall. _Jug_. 114.

[1225] Cic. _Brut_. 34. 129; _de Orat_. ii. 22. 91.

[1226] Liv. _Ep_. lvi. (see the next note). For the probable date of

this enactment (151 B.C.) see Mommsen _Staatsrecht_ i. p. 521.

[1227] Liv. _Ep_. lvi Cum bellum Numantinum vitio ducum non sine pudore

publico duraret, delatus est ultro Scipioni Africano a senatu populoque

Romano consulatus; quem cum illi capere ob legem, quae vetabat quemquam

iterum consulem fieri, non liceret, sicut priori consulatu, legibus

solutus est.

[1228] Plut. _Mar_. 12 [Greek: _kai to deuteron hypatos apedeichthae,

tou men nomou koluontos aponta kai mae dialiponta chronon horismenon

authis aireisthai, tou de daemou tous antilegontas ekbalontos_.]

Plutarch adds that the people recalled the dispensation granted to

Scipio when the annihilation of the Carthaginian power was planned.

This is perhaps a mistaken reference to the dispensation granted to

Scipio in the Numantine war. See Liv. _Ep_. lvi. (quoted in the last

note); Cic. _pro Leg. Man_. 20. 60 and Mommsen _Staatsr_. l.c. As to

the irregularity involved in Marius's absence, it is questionable

whether Plutarch is right in supposing that a personal _professio_ was

required at this time. See Mommsen _Staatsr_. i. p. 504. Possibly the

irregularity consisted in the fact that there had been no formal

candidature at all. Other references to this election of Marius are to

be found in Sall. _Jug_. 114; Vellei. ii. 12; Liv. _Ep_. lxvii.

[1229] Sall. _Jug_. 114, Marius consul absens factus est, et ei decreta

provincia Gallia.

End of Project Gutenberg's A History of Rome, Vol 1, by A. H. J. Greenidge

A History of Rome During the Later Republic and Early Principate · 第 13 / 13 章