DEBATE ON THE FRAME-WORK BILL, IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS, FEBRUARY 27, 1812.

The order of the day for the second reading of this Bill being read,

Lord BYRON rose, and (for the first time) addressed their Lordships

as follows:--

My Lords; the subject now submitted to your Lordships for the first

time, though new to the House, is by no means new to the country. I

believe it had occupied the serious thoughts of all descriptions of

persons, long before its introduction to the notice of that

legislature, whose interference alone could be of real service. As a

person in some degree connected with the suffering county, though a

stranger not only to this House in general, but to almost every

individual whose attention I presume to solicit, I must claim some

portion of your Lordships' indulgence, whilst I offer a few

observations on a question in which I confess myself deeply

interested.

To enter into any detail of the riots would be superfluous: the House

is already aware that every outrage short of actual bloodshed has

been perpetrated, and that the proprietors of the Frames obnoxious to

the rioters, and all persons supposed to be connected with them, have

been liable to insult and violence. During the short time I recently

passed in Nottinghamshire, not twelve hours elapsed without some

fresh act of violence; and on the day I left the county I was

informed that forty Frames had been broken the preceding evening, as

usual, without resistance and without detection.

Such was then the state of that county, and such I have reason to

believe it to be at this moment. But whilst these outrages must be

admitted to exist to an alarming extent, it cannot be denied that

they have arisen from circumstances of the most unparalleled

distress: the perseverance of these miserable men in their

proceedings, tends to prove that nothing but absolute want could have

driven a large, and once honest and industrious, body of the people,

into the commission of excesses so hazardous to themselves, their

families, and the community. At the time to which I allude, the town

and county were burdened with large detachments of the military; the

police was in motion, the magistrates assembled, yet all the

movements, civil and military, had led to--nothing. Not a single

instance had occurred of the apprehension of any real delinquent

actually taken in the fact, against whom there existed legal evidence

sufficient for conviction. But the police, however useless, were by

no means idle: several notorious delinquents had been detected; men,

liable to conviction, on the clearest evidence, of the capital crime

of poverty; men, who had been nefariously guilty of lawfully

begetting several children, whom, thanks to the times! they were

unable to maintain. Considerable injury has been done to the

proprietors of the improved Frames. These machines were to them an

advantage, inasmuch as they superseded the necessity of employing a

number of workmen, who were left in consequence to starve. By the

adoption of one species of Frame in particular, one man performed the

work of many, and the superfluous labourers were thrown out of

employment. Yet it is to be observed, that the work thus executed was

inferior in quality; not marketable at home, and merely hurried over

with a view to exportation. It was called, in the cant of the trade,

by the name of "Spider work." The rejected workmen, in the blindness

of their ignorance, instead of rejoicing at these improvements in

arts so beneficial to mankind, conceived themselves to be sacrificed

to improvements in mechanism. In the foolishness of their hearts they

imagined, that the maintenance and well doing of the industrious

poor, were objects of greater consequence than the enrichment of a

few individuals by any improvement, in the implements of trade, which

threw the workmen out of employment, and rendered the labourer

unworthy of his hire. And it must be confessed that although the

adoption of the enlarged machinery in that state of our commerce

which the country once boasted, might have been beneficial to the

master without being detrimental to the servant; yet, in the present

situation of our manufactures, rotting in warehouses, without a

prospect of exportation, with the demand for work and workmen equally

diminished, Frames of this description tend materially to aggravate

the distress and discontent of the disappointed sufferers. But the

real cause of these distresses and consequent disturbances lies

deeper. When we are told that these men are leagued together not only

for the destruction of their own comfort, but of their very means of

subsistence, can we forget that it is the bitter policy, the

destructive warfare of the last eighteen years, which has destroyed

their comfort, your comfort, all men's comfort? That policy, which,

originating with "great statesmen now no more," has survived the dead

to become a curse on the living, unto the third and fourth

generation! These men never destroyed their looms till they were

become useless, worse than useless; till they were become actual

impediments to their exertions in obtaining their daily bread. Can

you, then, wonder that in times like these, when bankruptcy,

convicted fraud, and imputed felony, are found in a station not far

beneath that of your Lordships, the lowest, though once most useful

portion of the people, should forget their duty in their distresses,

and become only less guilty than one of their representatives? But

while the exalted offender can find means to baffle the law, new

capital punishments must be devised, new snares of death must be

spread for the wretched mechanic, who is famished into guilt. These

men were willing to dig, but the spade was in other hands: they were

not ashamed to beg, but there was none to relieve them: their own

means of subsistence were cut off, all other employments

pre-occupied; and their excesses, however to be deplored and

condemned, can hardly be subject of surprise.

It has been stated that the persons in the temporary possession of

frames connive at their destruction; if this be proved upon enquiry,

it were necessary that such material accessories to the crime should

be principles in the punishment. But I did hope, that any measure

proposed by his Majesty's government, for your Lordships' decision,

would have had conciliation for its basis; or, if that were hopeless,

that some previous enquiry, some deliberation would have been deemed

requisite; not that we should have been called at once without

examination, and without cause, to pass sentences by wholesale, and

sign death-warrants blindfold. But, admitting that these men had no

cause of complaint; that the grievances of them and their employers

were alike groundless; that they deserved the worst; what

inefficiency, what imbecility has been evinced in the method chosen

to reduce them! Why were the military called out to be made a mockery

of, if they were to be called out at all? As far as the difference of

seasons would permit, they have merely parodied the summer campaign

of Major Sturgeon; and, indeed, the whole proceedings, civil and

military, seemed on the model of those of the mayor and corporation

of Garratt.--Such marchings and counter-marchings! from Nottingham to

Bullwell, from Bullwell to Banford, from Banford to Mansfield! and

when at length the detachments arrived at their destination, in all

"the pride, pomp, and circumstance of glorious war," they came just

in time to witness the mischief which had been done, and ascertain

the escape of the perpetrators, to collect the "_spolia opima_" in

the fragments of broken frames, and return to their quarters amidst

the derision of old women, and the hootings of children. Now, though,

in a free country, it were to be wished, that our military should

never be too formidable, at least to ourselves, I cannot see the

policy of placing them in situations where they can only be made

ridiculous. As the sword is the worst argument that can be used, so

should it be the last. In this instance it has been the first; but

providentially as yet only in the scabbard. The present measure will,

indeed, pluck it from the sheath; yet had proper meetings been held

in the earlier stages of these riots, had the grievances of these men

and their masters (for they also had their grievances) been fairly

weighed and justly examined, I do think that means might have been

devised to restore these workmen to their avocations, and

tranquillity to the county. At present the county suffers from the

double infliction of an idle military and a starving population. In

what state of apathy have we been plunged so long, that now for the

first time the house has been officially apprised of these

disturbances? All this has been transacting within 130 miles of

London, and yet we, "good easy men, have deemed full sure our

greatness was a ripening," and have sat down to enjoy our foreign

triumphs in the midst of domestic calamity. But all the cities you

have taken, all the armies which have retreated before your leaders,

are but paltry subjects of self-congratulation, if your land divides

against itself, and your dragoons and your executioners must be let

loose against your fellow-citizens.--You call these men a mob,

desperate, dangerous, and ignorant; and seem to think that the only

way to quiet the "_Bellua multorum capitum_" is to lop off a few of

its superfluous heads. But even a mob may be better reduced to reason

by a mixture of conciliation and firmness, than by additional

irritation and redoubled penalties. Are we aware of our obligations

to a mob? It is the mob that labour in your fields and serve in your

houses,--that man your navy, and recruit your army,--that have

enabled you to defy all the world, and can also defy you when neglect

and calamity have driven them to despair! You may call the people a

mob; but do not forget, that a mob too often speaks the sentiments of

the people. And here I must remark, with what alacrity you are

accustomed to fly to the succour of your distressed allies, leaving

the distressed of your own country to the care of Providence or--the

parish. When the Portuguese suffered under the retreat of the French,

every arm was stretched out, every hand was opened, from the rich

man's largess to the widow's mite, all was bestowed, to enable them

to rebuild their villages and replenish their granaries. And at this

moment, when thousands of misguided but most unfortunate

fellow-countrymen are struggling with the extremes of hardships and

hunger, as your charity began abroad it should end at home. A much

less sum, a tithe of the bounty bestowed on Portugal, even if those

men (which I cannot admit without enquiry) could not have been

restored to their employments, would have rendered unnecessary the

tender mercies of the bayonet and the gibbet. But doubtless our

friends have too many foreign claims to admit a prospect of domestic

relief; though never did such objects demand it. I have traversed the

seat of war in the Peninsula, I have been in some of the most

oppressed provinces of Turkey, but never under the most despotic of

infidel governments did I behold such squalid wretchedness as I have

seen since my return in the very heart of a Christian country. And

what are your remedies? After months of inaction, and months of

action worse than inactivity, at length comes forth the grand

specific, the never-failing nostrum of all state physicians, from the

days of Draco to the present time. After feeling the pulse and

shaking the head over the patient, prescribing the usual course of

warm water and bleeding, the warm water of your mawkish police, and

the lancets of your military, these convulsions must terminate in

death, the sure consummation of the prescriptions of all political

Sangrados. Setting aside the palpable injustice and the certain

inefficiency of the bill, are there not capital punishments

sufficient in your statutes? Is there not blood enough upon your

penal code, that more must be poured forth to ascend to Heaven and

testify against you? How will you carry the bill into effect? Can you

commit a whole county to their own prisons? Will you erect a gibbet

in every field, and hang up men like scarecrows? or will you proceed

(as you must to bring this measure into effect) by decimation? place

the county under martial law? depopulate and lay waste all around

you? and restore Sherwood Forest as an acceptable gift to the crown,

in its former condition of a royal chase and an asylum for outlaws?

Are these the remedies for a starving and desperate populace? Will

the famished wretch who has braved your bayonets be appalled by your

gibbets? When death is a relief, and the only relief it appears that

you will afford him, will he be dragooned into tranquillity? Will

that which could not be effected by your grenadiers, be accomplished

by your executioners? If you proceed by the forms of law, where is

your evidence? Those who have refused to impeach their accomplices,

when transportation only was the punishment, will hardly be tempted

to witness against them when death is the penalty. With all due

deference to the noble lords opposite, I think a little

investigation, some previous enquiry would induce even them to change

their purpose. That most favourite state measure, so marvellously

efficacious in many and recent instances, temporising, would not be

without its advantages in this. When a proposal is made to emancipate

or relieve, you hesitate, you deliberate for years, you temporise and

tamper with the minds of men; but a death-bill must be passed off

hand, without a thought of the consequences. Sure I am, from what I

have heard, and from what I have seen, that to pass the hill under

all the existing circumstances, without enquiry, without

deliberation, would only be to add injustice to irritation, and

barbarity to neglect. The framers of such a bill must be content to

inherit the honours of that Athenian lawgiver whose edicts were said

to be written not in ink but in blood. But suppose it past; suppose

one of these men, as I have seen them,--meagre with famine, sullen

with despair, careless of a life which your Lordships are perhaps

about to value at something less than the price of a

stocking-frame;--suppose this man surrounded by the children for whom

he is unable to procure bread at the hazard of his existence, about

to be torn for ever from a family which he lately supported in

peaceful industry, and which it is not his fault that he can no

longer so support;--suppose this man, and there are ten thousand such

from whom you may select your victims, dragged into court, to be

tried for this new offence, by this new law; still, there are two

things wanting to convict and condemn him; and these are, in my

opinion,--twelve butchers for a jury, and a Jefferies for a judge!

DEBATE ON THE EARL OF DONOUGHMORE'S MOTION FOR A COMMITTEE ON THE

ROMAN CATHOLIC CLAIMS, APRIL 21. 1812.

Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 6 With His Letters and Journals · 第 116 / 153 题