But as I have just observed, it is not in Infancy only that Stays are

used; but in one Sex, ’till four, five, or six, Years old; and in the

other for Life. The Solicitude of Parents about Shape, is chiefly

confin’d to the Girls; Boys, when breech’d, like Eels, twist themselves

into a thousand Forms, and prove strait at last; while the Girls, with

less Freedom and more Anxiety, seldom come off so well. Still Mothers

contend for the Necessity of Stays; and maintain from Experience, that

the Shape, instead of being hurt with them, is spoil’d without them. Here

then is the grand Point, whether Nature requires these Props or not;

the Learned say they don’t; general Practice says they do: the Learned

recommend that Nature be left to Fashion the Parts herself; but general

Practice contradicts this: and who will take upon them to decide so

important a Matter? for me, I confess it is too much.

When I read or hear the Opinion of skilful Men, and weigh their

Reasoning, I heartily concur with them; and when I see an exquisite

Shape under a judicious Mother’s Management, I am inclin’d to applaud her

Judgment, and commend the Choice of her Stay-maker. However, that I might

not leave this Head and determine nothing, I have already recommended

to Parents to exercise their own Judgment, and to seek that of others;

whereby many of the Errors, become general thro’ Ignorance and Time, will

be removed. The Learned, unless dogmatical, will be brought to allow,

that Stays may often be worn without the least Injury; that as Girls are

by Nature more tender and delicate than Boys, many of them would have

been deformed either thro’ bad nursing, or some inbred Infirmity, tho’

they never had worn a Stay in their Lives: and Parents will be convinc’d,

that while Nature is labouring to compleat their Children’s Growth, both

Health and Beauty greatly depend on their not being braced injudiciously.

As I am speaking of Health and Beauty, it will not be improper to

observe, that with regard to the outward Form, what is most agreeable

to see, is often most conducive to Health and Strength. Thus the

Dancing-master has Power to confer many Advantages on his Scholars.

That Command and free Play of the Joints of the Knees, with the Habit

of keeping them unbent but when necessary, and the proper turning out

of the Toes, add great Firmness and Grace both to standing and walking:

that graceful Power of the Arms, the easy Fall, and the dropping of the

Shoulders from the Neck, gives a pleasing Distinction of the bred from

the unbred: and the keeping the Body upright, and throwing forward the

Chest, are besides being great Beauties, vastly conducive to the free

Exercise of the Lungs, and to the proper Action of the whole _Viscera_.

But while this Part of Education is justly commended as conducive to

Health, and pleasing to behold, what shall we say of those, who under the

Appearance of increasing their Beauty destroy it; and who, while aiming

at Health, often deprive themselves of Life. I have shewn that bodily

Defects are more or less the Lot of all Mankind; but where Judgment free

from Error can rectify them, we have Power to do it. If we can find a

Cure for Diseases born with us, we certainly may and ought; if we can

increase our Strength, and add Graces to Nature, we undoubtedly should;

we may curl our Hair, increase its Growth, or cut it off; we may and

ought to comb or shave our Head, pare our Nails, and scour off all

that Foulness which Nature throws out upon the Surface of our Body, and

maintain a constant Cleanliness: But all this does not imply that we may

give ourselves a new Face; and yet little less is frequently attempted.

When Nature is oppressed within us, she often, for our Relief, throws

out the Malady upon the Skin; if it happen to be on the Face, we grow

restless and impatient; we are ignorant of the Kindness done to us;

and to remove the Blemish to our Beauty, we unadvisedly drive back the

redundant Humour; perhaps on our Vitals; and thus fall a Sacrifice to our

Pride or Ignorance.

There is a Practice, particularly among the Great, shocking to Nature

and to Reflection; that of using Paint. Paint is to the Face, what

Affectation is to the Mind: as the one is a ridiculous Mimic of amiable

Qualities we are Strangers to, so the other is a ridiculous Affectation

of Beauty we cannot reach. But while Paint disappoints those who are

attach’d to it, by conferring false Beauty, it is attended with the

Mischief of impairing real; and many who by Nature alone would be comely

in the Decline of Life, are, by this odious Practice, hagged even in

Youth. Temperance, Exercise, good Hours, and a chearful Mind, will

best preserve the Bloom of Life; but such is the present Age, such the

prevailing false Taste, that Error is confounded with Error, and our

corrupt Judgment is still farther corrupted. There was a Time that Paint

was designed to give a false Bloom when the real was declining; but now

it is used to hide even the natural Bloom: it is made an Instrument to

destroy that Beauty which Providence has bestowed; and instead of being

grateful for the Blessing, it is shamefully hid under a pale Enamel, or a

dead White! What an Indignity, what an Affront is this to the Author of

all Nature, to the Bestower of all Blessings!

Lord _Hallifax_, in his Advice to a Daughter, goes so far as to dissuade

her even from the Use of Sweets. “Those Ladies (says he) who perfume

themselves, will be strongly suspected of doing it to conceal some other

Stink.” Cleanliness is to be preferred to every foreign Aid; for tho’

it is certain, that Nature throws off some offensive Matter, whether

perceptible or not, by the several Organs given for those Purposes, yet

daily washing the Mouth, combing the Head, and using every other Means

of Cleanliness, bids much fairer for rendering us inoffensive to others,

than the general and immoderate Use of Perfumes. And therefore I cannot

but concur with this noble Writer, in dissuading Parents from introducing

among their Children the Custom of seeking foreign Assistance in order to

be sweet. Should I add to this, that continually striking on those Nerves

which convey the Sense of Smelling to us, is prejudicial to our Health, I

should advance no more than what many learned Men hold as a Truth.

But there is another Pretext for using Sweets, which must not pass

unobserved; that of keeping us from being sensible of the various Smells

around us. It is true that those are sometimes so grossly offensive,

as to justify, and even demand, our shutting them out: but in general,

there is too much false Delicacy, too strong a Tincture of Pride, and

too little Sense of our own Infirmities in this Practice. On these last

Heads then I must beg Leave to admonish Parents, even of the highest

Rank (should this little Work ever fall into their Hands) to be greatly

circumspect with regard to their Children; that they be careful to give

them a due Sense of the Blessings Nature has bestowed on them; that they

point out to them the most rational Way of correcting natural Defects;

and above all, to imprint on them a just Detestation of every Practice

which has a Tendency to raise their Vanity, and add Fuel to their Pride.

To this end, Parents should convince their Children, that the fashionable

Cosmetics greatly endanger Health; Paint debases both the Face and the

Mind; the wanton Use of Perfumes is an Error in Principle, and all are

fraught with mischievous Effects.

It may be urged, that Children are not subject to the Use of these

things, at least while Children: I grant it. But my Readers must observe,

that when I enter on a Topic, I am naturally led thro’ it; and as we

never stand still in Life, so Parents must bring their Ideas forward,

and consider their Children as always advancing. Nay I may without

Impropriety say farther, that Vanity is one of the first things that

Children learn; and it demands the early Attention of Parents to keep it

under, by discountenancing the Practice of every thing which tends to

support or cherish it.

Parents are naturally anxious to have this first Entrance on the Stage of

Life got thro’ with Success; and I flatter myself, that the Rules already

laid down will conquer, or at least lessen the Difficulty attending it.

How eager are all good Parents to see their Children weaned; to have them

firm on their Feet; to find their Mouths full of Teeth; and to hear

them prattle: nay there are many, particularly Fathers, who think their

Children of no Importance, at least they have no Pleasure in them, ’till

these are effected. That nothing therefore may obstruct this Progress, I

will here add a Word or two more.

It is a Point much disputed, whether a young Child is better or worse for

wearing Shoes and Stockings; for my own Part, I think they are both: but,

as this may seem a Paradox, I will explain myself. The Disuse of Shoes

and Stockings is to make Children hardy; but my Readers will remember,

that unless Regard be had to Time and Season, they may cramp their tender

Limbs, and do them great Harm. Stockings therefore cannot with Prudence

be totally neglected, lest it prove a Neglect to the Child; and Shoes,

when they are put on it’s Feet, are, besides being not so disagreeable

to see, much safer to walk about in; as nobody can answer that Pins,

Splinters, Stones, and various other things will not sometimes fall in

their Way, even on the smoothest Floor, or a Carpet. Thus much in their

Favour: but what I have to say against them is not less significant.

According to the usual Method of managing Children, they wear no Cloth

in the Day-time after five or six Months old; and then, if they are not

carefully watched, they will frequently wet themselves, and thereby make

Shoes and Stockings an Impediment to their thriving, by soaking them, as

it were, in Wet, Cold, and Nastiness. Either then let a Child be kept

clean with them, or intirely go without them; for of two Evils, it is

always most eligible to chuse the least.

But a little Judgment and Attention would obviate this Inconvenience;

for as even Infants are not without various Ways of shewing their Wants,

an Attention to these, and a Method of putting them regularly into

their Chair, would be very convenient both to Mother and Child: and if

notwithstanding this, it should by chance wet itself, having dry Shoes

and Stockings always ready to put on, would prevent any ill Effect.

I am of Opinion, that Parents are often too eager to have their Children

walk; by which, they take such Means as serve to retard it. Two things

much in use manifestly keep Children back, viz. much sitting, especially

with their Cloaths up, and much standing. They should never sit long in

their Chair, nor be left to support the Weight of their Bodies, while

their Joints and Limbs are tender. Let them by all means feel that they

have Feet, but let them not be left alone, ’till Time, Air, and Exercise

have strengthened their Solids, and given them a lasting Firmness.

But we will now suppose that these first Difficulties are all surmounted.

Parents have still many things to do, which require indeed Attention, but

neither need, nor ought to be accompanied with any considerable Degree of

Difficulty or Pain.

Notwithstanding a Child is advancing, I still recommend, that Milk and

Water with Bread, or Milk-porridge, or Rice-milk, be it’s constant

Breakfast. Parents may sometimes alter their Course, may easily contrive

little Changes in a Child’s Diet, that will be very pleasing, without

either seeming to humour it, or varying it so sensibly, as to hurt the

Quality. For Example, in Summer, pour warm Water on Milk to take off its

Rawness, and let the Child with a Piece of Bread bite and sup: in Winter

let it have Milk-porridge, or Rice-milk. Milk is accounted to lose of its

natural Sweetness by boiling; therefore in general it should be avoided.

But there is another Principle Parents are to act by, viz. a Child’s

Habit of Body. Nothing is more certain than that our Food may be made

our Physic; and if our Judgment went Hand in Hand with Nature, we should

happily escape many bodily Infirmities, many grievous Evils: for it would

then be easy to see when she is regular, when not; whether she wants a

Curb or a Spur; whether she is robust or delicate; or, in fine, whether

she has any Bias, and where. To familiarize this, let me observe, that

where a Child is hot, dry, and costive, Parents should sometimes desist

from the Use of Milk, and give it Water-gruel, either with or without

Currants; or very small Broth, or Milk-porridge, which last is rendered

opening by the Oat-meal. So likewise, where the Bowels are weak, and

there is an habitual purging, the Child should be kept more closely

to Milk; have Rice-milk, Rice-gruel, or Broth thickened with Rice; or

thick Milk, or hasty Pudding made with Milk and Flour. Of one or other

of these things, as Occasion serves, a Child may properly breakfast as

long as the Guidance of Parents will be necessary: and when it is no

longer a Child, but comes to act for itself, it will not be easy to find

more wholesome Food. Tea, Coffee, and Chocolate are the most usual

Breakfasts in lieu of these. Tea has been spoken of already. Coffee is

hot and dry; it is rather fit for a Medicine than a Meal, and should be

used with Judgment; it is manifestly a Cephalic, and sometimes removes a

Head-ach instantaneously as if it were by Magic; but intemperately used,

it is very apt to sink the Spirits, and bring on Tremblings. Chocolate

has a nutritious, balsamic Quality, yet it disagrees with many People;

it does not sit easy on every Stomach; either from the natural Property

of the Nuts, or from its being made too thick, and sometimes drank with

Milk, which renders it still heavier. But, generally speaking, Tea is the

Breakfast for Children, which is often made worse, by being accompanied

with hot Bread. I have seen a Mother so cruelly kind, for so with Truth

we may call it, as to give a young Child all the Crum of a hot Roll for

its Breakfast; and this repeated every Day, till it had lost not only

it’s Appetite, but almost it’s Breath.

There is nothing Parents should more promote in their Children than the

Love of Bread; they should be taught to eat a great deal of it with their

Meat; be taught to eat it sometimes alone; but not be suffered to eat it

quite new: for the Custom of cramming Children with hot Bread, is one of

the Ways that make them unhealthy, without Parents being aware of it.

Butter is allowed to yield great Nourishment, but there are Objections

which Parents must not disregard. It often rises in the Stomach, is apt

to give that Pain which People call the Heart-burn, and is judged to be

frequently the Occasion of Childrens breaking out, by obstructing some

of the Glands. Butter therefore should be eat much more sparingly than

usual, and great Care should be taken that it is never rancid.

Cheese is a kind of Food which Children are naturally very fond of;

and, if left to themselves, will eat it to an immoderate Degree. I have

observed before, that little Changes in a Child’s Diet are at times very

right; particularly to prevent any Dislike to certain things, either from

Disuse or Affectation; but when Cheese comes in turn to be the Meal, it

should be under great Restraint. Suppose, for Example, a Child’s Supper

is to be Bread and Cheese, the Bread should most certainly be considered

as the Meal; a very small Quantity of Cheese to give it a Relish, and

convey it down, is all it ought to have. Cheese, tho’ nutritious, should

never be eat in large Quantity; it gives Children a restless painful

Fondness for what is relishing, and takes off their Appetite from more

wholesome simple Diet; it is found to disagree with many Stomachs;

toasted, it is particularly bad, and difficult to digest; and it has

often a Pungency, which creates Heat, Thirst, and Costiveness.

Flesh Meat has already been touched upon; I will here add, that besides

the Parents Care that Children do not begin too soon with it, nor eat it

intemperately, they must pay a due Regard not only to the Quality of the

Meat they give them, but to the Time and Manner of eating it.

Physicians are of Opinion, that Animal-food is not in Perfection ’till

full grown; for, like unripe Fruit, their Juices are crude, and always

more or less improper to mix with our Blood, ’till they are in a State

of Maturity: hence it appears, that Beef and Mutton are more wholesome

than Veal and Lamb. Nor should Beef, as the Fibres of it are very

strong, be eat too freely by those whose Digestion is weak; and when

rendered harder by lying long in Brine, it is still more improper.

Pork, tho’ a favourite kind of Food, is in several Respects improper to

be eat frequently; it is extremely apt to offend the Stomach; it has a

remarkable Tendency to bring on Purgings; and it is suspected not to form

so pure a Chyle, and to be more disposed to load the Blood with those

Particles which create scorbutic Disorders than any other Meat. Upon the

whole, no Meat is so universally suited to our Nature as Mutton. For

after all our Labour and Expence to obtain greater Rarities, after we

have fatigued ourselves with Sport, hunted down defenceless Creatures,

brought to the Ground the most wary Birds, and cloyed ourselves with the

choicest Viands, we find perhaps a truer Relish, and a better Appetite

for a Mutton-chop. So Topers, after spending the Night in search of the

richest Wine, after rioting in Excess, and wearying the Tavern-waiters to

please their Palates, seek Comfort and Refreshment in a Glass of Water.

Fish is a sort of Diet extremely improper for Children. I would recommend

to Parents never to let a Child so much as taste it for the first seven

Years at least. If it were nothing more than the Danger of Bones

sticking in it’s Throat, it is enough to alarm prudent People; but most

kinds of Fish are naturally flabby, cold, and watry; are very unfit for

young Stomachs, and usually made more so, by being accompanied with rich

Sauce.

Children should not be debarred Fruit; but the Use of it requires some

Attention; 1st, It should always be good in its Kind, and ripe. 2dly,

Regard is to be had what Sort agrees, and what disagrees. 3dly, Some

Limitation as to Quantity. It is a disputed Point whether we may eat

Fruit in a Morning; other Nations do frequently, we seldom. In _France_,

_Germany_, _Switzerland_, and many other Places, the People always eat

Bread with their Fruit; and it appears so rational that I believe it

were better that we did too. Fruit gives some a Pain at the Stomach,

others not; Apples, Currants, and those Kinds, which, tho’ ripe, have

still a Degree of grateful Acidity in them, usually agree best. Pears

and Plumbs, especially the _Orleans_ Plumb, have a Tendency to bring

on Purgings, which sometimes terminate in a Bloody Flux and Death; and

therefore should be given to Children with great Caution: but, in fine,

Experience here, as in many other things, is to be our Guide. One general

Rule I would recommend, which is, that the Skin or Rind of all Fruit

that is in any manner tough, be not eat. It is the Pulp and juicy Part

of the Fruit which refreshes us; and Nature, to preserve these, has

wrapped them up in a tough kind of Coat, which is judged by many to be

very unfit to take into the Stomach. I must not omit to speak of Nuts. I

observed before, that merely from the Danger of Bones Children should be

kept from Fish; so, had Nuts no other Effect than loosening the Teeth by

frequent cracking them, which they do manifestly, they should never be

meddled with; but in Fact they have. I have seen People eat Walnuts ’till

they could scarcely breathe; the famous _Barcelona_ Nuts, besides the

Substance or fibrous Part of them, often abound with a rank kind of Oil;

and even our own Hazel Nuts and Filberds, when eaten in any Quantity, are

apt to create Thirst, cord up, as it were, the whole Chest, and produce

Coughs.

Self-gratification on one hand, and Self-interest on the other, have

introduced several Trades the World in general might dispense with;

two of which demand my Observation, viz. the Confectioner and the

Pastry-cook. That these Trades have their Use I do not deny. A Nobleman,

according to the Rules of Politeness, cannot make an Entertainment

without a Desert; thus the Confectioner becomes necessary: in inferior

Life, the Coarseness of the Entertainment is taken off by the Assistance

of the Pastry-cook: all which may be reasonable, if reasonably used. But

when I consider the general Misapplication of these luscious Dainties to

Children, I cannot but condemn it.

If a Child is sent to visit a Relation or Friend, the grand Compliment

is, to apply to the Confectioner or the Pastry-cook; and ’till the little

Visitor be crammed with Biskets, or Cakes, or Tarts, or Sweetmeats, or

all in their Turn, and that even to a Surfeit, the welcome is not thought

compleat. Still there is some Excuse to palliate this Mistake; the Child

is considered as a Visitor; and these Excesses are the mistaken Effects

of Good-Nature and Respect; both which are apt grievously to err against

Judgment. But my Principals here are the Parents; for from them alone

must come the Habit of doing right, and by them alone must the Error be

prevented or corrected.

I have no Objection to a Child’s having a Tart or Bisket by Chance,

but I am a profess’d Enemy to the daily Abuses committed with them.

If we view the Loads of Wigs, Tarts, and Cakes, every Day made at the

Pastry-cooks, we must be astonished at their Consumption. The Truth is,

People give these Things to their Children ’till they have made them

sick, and then give them because they are sick. If a Person happens to

call on a Friend where there is a Child indisposed, it is ten to one but

they find a Tart in it’s Hands; Ah! poor thing, says Mamma, it has eat

nothing to-day, so I sent for a Tart for it. That the Hands, the Face,

the Apparel and Bedding of Children, imprudently indulg’d with this kind

of Food, be constantly daub’d and besmear’d, is the least bad Consequence

attending such Indiscretion; it has several other Effects, particularly

on their Health; by vitiating their Appetites, engendering Crudities, and

alienating them from more wholesome Diet.

But let us go lower into Common Life; and view the various Outlets from

_London_. What Swarms, what Multitudes of Children are there not in

the Fields on every fine Sunday! And what is their Entertainment? Why,

generally speaking, they are stuffed with a coarse kind of Pastry-ware

made coarse on purpose for Children, who of all the human Species ought

not to touch it: then to compleat the Mischief, they are to wash it down

with a foul, nauseous, heady kind of Ale, or other Malt Liquor. Yet when

one opposes this Practice, as every one must with Hand and Heart, who

has but a Head to guide them; Poor Things! cry the mistaken Parents,

what! take Children into the Fields, and not give them a Bun! But how

grievously does their dotard Fondness mislead them! Good Bread, with a

very little Sweet Butter, wash’d down with Water, or clear well-brew’d

Small Beer, would preserve their Health; while the only use of this

Trash, is to impair or destroy it.

To reduce to Method what has been here said concerning Diet, I must

observe, that next to the proper kind of Food, nothing is more conducive

to Health than a Habit of eating Meals regularly. Children accustomed

to eat all Day long are seldom healthy; besides, that it makes them

disorderly, and often throws a Family into Confusion to gratify all their

little Humours. The proper Breakfast has been already pointed out; their

Dinner should be made of one Dish, only, unless by great Chance a passing

Taste of a second; they should either eat a great deal of Bread, or

blend their Meat with Greens, Turnips, or other Garden Stuff; Pickles

and all high Sauces should not be touch’d by them; and their Meal should

be washed down with Water or light Small Beer. Their Supper may, like

their Breakfast, sometimes be vary’d, as to the Auxiliary; Bread is to

be the Repast; yet a small Portion of Butter, Cheese, Fruit, or Tart,

may in their Turn accompany it: the Vehicle the same as at Dinner. But

should a Child at intermediate Times, especially before Dinner, complain

of Hunger, and fasting long might make it’s Stomach ach; in that Case

nothing so good as a bit of Bread; and if used to it, it will eat it as

eagerly as the greatest Dainty; but to see Children walk about a House

with Tarts or Bread and Butter in their Hands, daubing every thing and

every body they touch, is certainly wrong; being not only detrimental to

their Health, but to their Manners too, as it is inexpressibly vulgar.

An essay on the government of children, under three general heads, viz. health, manners, and education · 第 5 / 18 段