Russians polled by the American Pew Research Center admitted that they

feel much better in a world dominated by the United States as a single

superpower. The KGB and its successors - Putin's former long-term

employers - actually engineered Russia's opening to the West and the

president's meteoric ascendancy. And no one in the army seriously

disputes the need for reform, professionalization and merciless

trimming of the bloated corps.

Reforms - of the military, Russia's decrepit utilities, dilapidated

infrastructure and housing, inflated and venal bureaucracy, corrupt

judiciary and civil service, choking monopolies and pernicious banking

sector - depend on the price of oil. Russia benefited mightily from the

surge in the value of the "black gold". But the windfall has helped

mask pressing problems and allowed timid legislators and officials to

postpone much needed - and fiercely resisted - changes.

Russia's "economic miracle" - oft-touted by the "experts" that brought

you "shock therapy" and by egregiously self-interested, Moscow-based,

investment bankers - is mostly prestidigitation. As the European Bank

for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) correctly noted in November,

Russia's 20 percent growth in the last three years merely reflects

enhanced usage of capacity idled by the ruination of 1998.

Neutering the positive externality of rising oil prices, one is left

with no increase in productivity since 1999. Industrial production -

outside the oil sector - actually slumped. As metropolitan incomes

rise, Russians revert to imports rather than consume shoddy and shabby

local products.

This, in turn, adversely affects the current account balance and the

viability of local enterprises, some of which are sincerely attempting

to restructure. According to Trud, a Russian business publication, two

fifths of the country's businesses are in the red. Russia's number of

small and medium enterprises peaked at 1 million in 1995-6. They employ

less than one fifth of the workforce (compared to two thirds in the

European Union and in many other countries in transition).

Thus, falling oil prices - though detrimental to Russia's ability to

repay its external debt and balance its budget - are a blessing in

disguise. Such declines will force the hand of the Putin administration

to engage in some serious structural reform - even in the face of

parliamentary elections in 2003 and presidential ones the year after.

Russians - wrongly - feel that their standard of living has stagnated.

Gazeta.ru claims that 39 million people are below the poverty line.

Many pensioners survive on $1 a day. In truth, real income per capita

is actually up by more than 8 percent this year alone. Income

inequality, though, has, indeed, gaped.

Responding to these concerns, though, in a "coattails" effect, the

president is expected to carry pro-Kremlin parties back into power in

2003 - a modicum of elections-inspired bribing is inevitable. State

wages and pensions will outpace inflation. The energy behemoths - major

sources of campaign financing - will be rewarded with rises in tariffs

to match cost of living increases.

Russia faces more than merely a skewed wealth distribution or

dependence on mineral wealth. Its difficulties are myriad. On cue from

Washington, it is again being hyped in the Western press as a sure-fire

investment destination and a pair of safe geostrategic hands. But the

dismal truth is that it is a third world country with first world

pretensions (and nuclear weapons). It exhibits all the risks attendant

to other medium-sized developing countries and emerging economies.

External debt repayments next year will exceed $15 billion. It can

easily afford them with oil prices anywhere above $20 and foreign

exchange reserves the highest since 1991. Russia even prepaid some of

its debt mountain this year. But if its export proceeds were to decline

by 40 percent in the forthcoming 3-4 years, Russia will, yet again, be

forced to reschedule or default. Every $1 dollar decline in Ural crude

prices translates to more than $1 billion lost income to the government.

Russia's population is both contracting and ageing. A ruinous pension

crisis is in the cards unless both the run-down health system and the

abysmally low birthrate recover. Immigration of ethnic Russians from

the former republics of the USSR to the Russian Federation has largely

run its course. According to Pravda.ru, more than 7 million people

emigrated from the Federation in the last decade.

Russia's informal sector is a vital, though crime-tainted, engine of

growth. Laundered money coupled with reinvested profits - from both

legitimate and illicit businesses - drive a lot of the private sector

and underlie the emergence of an affluent elite, especially in Moscow

and other urban centers. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit,

Goskomstat - the State Statistics Committee - regularly adjusts the

formal figures up by 25 percent to incorporate estimates of the black

economy.

Russia faces a dilemma: to quash the economic underground and thus

enhance both tax receipts and Russia's image as an orderly polity - or

to let the pent-up entrepreneurial forces of the "gray sectors" work

their magic?

Russia is slated to join the World Trade Organization in 2004. This

happy occasion would mean deregulation, liberalization and opening up

to competition - all agonizing moves. Russian industry and agriculture

are not up to the task. It took a massive devaluation and a

debilitating financial crisis in 1998 to resurrect consumer appetite

for indigenous goods.

Farming is mostly state-owned, or state-sponsored. Monopolies,

duopolies and cartels make up the bulk of the manufacturing and mining

sectors - especially in the wake of the recent tsunami of mergers and

acquisitions. The Economist Intelligence Unit quotes estimates that 20

conglomerates account for up to 70 percent of the country's $330

billion GDP. The oligarchs are still there, lurking. The banks are

still paralyzed and compromised, though their retail sector is

reviving.

Russians are still ambivalent about foreigners. Paranoid xenophobia was

replaced by guarded wariness. Recently, Russia revoked the fast track

work permit applications hitherto put to good use by managers, scholars

and experts from the West. Foreign minority shareholders still complain

of being ripped-off by powerful, well-connected - and minacious -

business interests.

With the bloody exception of Chechnya, Putin's compelling personality

has helped subdue the classic tensions between center and regions. But,

as Putin himself admitted in a radio Q-and-A session on December 19,

this peaceful co-existence is fraying at the edges.

The president will try to reach a top-down political settlement in the

renegade province prior to the 2004 elections, but will fail. Reform is

anathema to many suborned governors of the periphery and the Kremlin's

miserly handouts are insufficient to grant it a decisive voice in

matters provincial. Devolution - a pet Putin project - is more about

accepting an unsavory reality than about re-defining the Russian state.

The economic disparity between rural and urban is striking. The

Economist Intelligence Unit describes this chasm thus:

"The processing industry is concentrated in the cities of Moscow, St

Petersburg, Yekaterinburg and Nizhny Novgorod. These larger cities have

managed the transition relatively well, as size has tended to bring

with it industrial diversity; smaller industrial centers have fared far

worse. The Soviet regime created new industrial centers such as Tomsk

and Novosibirsk, but Siberia and the Russian Far Eastern regions remain

largely unindustrialised, having traditionally served as a raw

materials and energy base. Owing to the boundless faith of Soviet

planners in the benefits of scale, one massive enterprise, or a small

group of related enterprises, often formed the basis for the entire

local economy of a substantial city or region. This factor, compounded

by the absence of unemployment benefits, makes the closure of bankrupt

enterprises a politically difficult decision."

The politically incorrect truth is that Russia's old power-structure is

largely intact, having altered only its ideological label. It is as

avaricious, nefarious and obstructive as ever. Nor does the Russian

state sport any checks and balances. Its institutions are suspect, its

executive untouchable, its law enforcement agencies delinquent.

Russians still hanker after "men of iron" and seek tradition rather

than innovation, prefer unity to pluralism, and appreciate authority

more than individualism. Russia - a ramshackle amalgamation of

competing turfs - is still ill-suited for capitalism or for liberal

democracy, though far less than it was only ten years ago.

Conspicuous consumption of imported products by vulgar parvenus is no

substitute to true modernity and a functioning economy. Russia is

frequently praised by expats with vested interests and by international

financial institutions, the long arms of its newfound ally, the United

States.

But, in truth, "modern", "stable", Russia is merely a glittering veneer

beneath which lurk, festering, the old ills of authoritarianism,

lawlessness, oligarchy, aggression, ignorance, superstition, and

repression mingled with extremes of poverty and disease. Here is one

safe prediction: none of these will diminish next year.

Russia Straddles the Euro-Atlantic Divide

By: Dr. Sam Vaknin

Also published by United Press International (UPI)

Also Read

The Janus Look

Russia's Second Empire

Russian Roulette - The Security Apparatus

Russia as a Creditor

Let My People Go - The Jackson-Vanik Controversy

The Chechen Theatre Ticket

Russia's Israeli Oil Bond

Russia's Idled Spies

Russia in 2003

Russian President Vladimir Putin warned on Tuesday, in an interview he

granted to TF1, a French television channel, that unilateral

American-British military action against Iraq would be a "grave

mistake" and an "unreasonable use of force". Russia might veto it in

the Security Council, he averred.

In a joint declaration with France and Germany, issued the same day, he

called to enhance the number of arms inspectors in Iraq as an

alternative to war.

Only weeks ago Russia was written off, not least by myself, as a

satellite of the United States. This newfound assertiveness has

confounded analysts and experts everywhere. Yet, appearances aside, it

does not signal a fundamental shift in Russian policy or worldview.

Russia could not resist the temptation of playing once more the

Leninist game of "inter-imperialist contradictions". It has long

masterfully exploited chinks in NATO's armor to further its own

economic, if not geopolitical, goals. Its convenient geographic sprawl

- part Europe, part Asia - allows it to pose as both a continental

power and a global one with interests akin to those of the United

States. Hence the verve with which it delved into the war against

terrorism, recasting internal oppression and meddling abroad as its

elements.

As Vladimir Lukin, deputy speaker of the Duma observed recently,

Britain having swerved too far towards America - Russia may yet become

an intermediary between a bitterly disenchanted USA and an irked Europe

and between the rich, industrialized West and developing countries in

Asia. Publicly, the USA has only mildly disagreed with Russia's

reluctance to countenance a military endgame in Iraq - while showering

France and Germany with vitriol for saying, essentially, the same

things.

The United States knows that Russia will not jeopardize the relevance

of the Security Council - one of the few remaining hallmarks of past

Soviet grandeur - by vetoing an American-sponsored resolution. But

Russia cannot be seen to be abandoning a traditional ally and a major

customer (Iraq) and newfound friends (France and Germany) too

expediently.

Nor can Putin risk further antagonizing Moscow hardliners who already

regard his perceived "Gorbachev-like" obsequiousness and far reaching

concessions to the USA as treasonous. The scrapping of the Anti

Ballistic Missile treaty, the expansion of NATO to Russia's borders,

America's presence in central Asia and the Caucasus, Russia's "near

abroad" - are traumatic reversals of fortune.

An agreed consultative procedure with the crumbling NATO hardly

qualifies as ample compensation. There are troubling rumblings of

discontent in the army. A few weeks ago, a Russian general in Chechnya

refused Putin's orders publicly - and with impunity. Additionally,

according to numerous opinion polls, the vast majority of Russians

oppose an Iraqi campaign.

By aligning itself with the fickle France and the brooding and

somnolent Germany, Russia is warning the USA that it should not be

taken for granted and that there is a price to pay for its allegiance

and good services. But Putin is not Boris Yeltsin, his inebriated

predecessor who over-played his hand in opposing NATO's operation in

Kosovo in 1999 - only to be sidelined, ignored and humiliated in the

postwar arrangements.

Russia wants a free hand in Chechnya and to be heard on international

issues. It aspires to secure its oil contracts in Iraq - worth tens of

billions of dollars - and the repayment of $9 billion in old debts by

the postbellum government. It seeks pledges that the oil market will

not be flooded by a penurious Iraq. It desires a free hand in Ukraine,

Armenia and Uzbekistan, among others. Russia wants to continue to sell

$4 billion a year in arms to China, India, Iran, Syria and other

pariahs unhindered.

Only the United States, the sole superpower, can guarantee that these

demands are met. Moreover, with a major oil producer such as Iraq as a

US protectorate, Russia becomes a hostage to American goodwill. Yet,

hitherto, all Russia received were expression of sympathy, claimed

Valeri Fyodorov, director of Political Friends, an independent Russian

think-tank, in an interview in the Canadian daily, National Post.

These are not trivial concerns. Russia's is a primitive economy, based

on commodities - especially energy products - and an over-developed

weapons industry. Its fortunes fluctuate with the price of oil, of

agricultural produce and with the need for arms, driven by regional

conflicts.

Should the price of oil collapse, Russia may again be forced to resort

to multilateral financing, a virtual monopoly of the long arms of US

foreign policy, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The USA

also has a decisive voice in the World Trade Organization (WTO),

membership thereof being a Russian strategic goal.

It was the United States which sponsored Russia's seat at table of the

G8 - the Group of Eight industrialized states - a much coveted

reassertion of the Russian Federation's global weight. According to

Rossiiskaya Gazeta, a Russian paper, the USA already announced a week

ago that it is considering cutting Russia off American financial aid -

probably to remind the former empire who is holding the purse strings.

But siding with America risks alienating the all-important core of

Europe: Germany and France. Europe - especially Germany - is Russia's

largest export destination and foreign investor. Russia is not

oblivious to that. It would like to be compensated generously by the

United States for assuming such a hazard.

Still, Europe is a captive of geography and history. It has few

feasible alternatives to Russian gas, for instance. As the recent $7

billion investment by British Petroleum proves, Russia - and, by

extension, central and east Europe - is Europe's growth zone and

natural economic hinterland.

Yet, it is America that captures the imagination of Russian oligarchs

and lesser businesses.

Russia aims to become the world's largest oil producer within the

decade. With this in mind, it is retooling its infrastructure and

investing in new pipelines and ports. The United States is aggressively

courted by Russian officials and "oiligarchs" - the energy tycoons.

With the Gulf states cast in the role of anti-American Islamic

militants, Russia emerges as a sane and safe - i.e., rationally driven

by self-interest - alternative supplier and a useful counterweight to

an increasingly assertive and federated Europe.

Russia's affinity with the United States runs deeper that the

confluence of commercial interests.

Russian capitalism is far more "Anglo-Saxon" than Old Europe's. The

Federation has an educated but cheap and abundant labor force, a patchy

welfare state, exportable natural endowments, a low tax burden and a

pressing need for unhindered inflows of foreign investment.

Russia's only hope of steady economic growth is the expansion of its

energy behemoths abroad. Last year it has become a net foreign direct

investor. It has a vested interest in globalization and world order

which coincide with America's. China, for instance, is as much Russia's

potential adversary as it is the United State's.

Russia welcomed the demise of the Taliban and is content with regime

changes in Iraq and North Korea - all American exploits. It can - and

does - contribute to America's global priorities. Collaboration between

the two countries' intelligence services has never been closer. Hence

also the thaw in Russia's relations with its erstwhile foe, Israel.

Russia's population is hungry and abrasively materialistic. Its robber

barons are more American in spirit than any British or French

entrepreneur. Russia's business ethos is reminiscent of 19th century

frontier America, not of 20th century staid Germany.

Russia is driven by kaleidoscopically shifting coalitions within a

narrow elite, not by its masses - and the elite wants money, a lot of

it and now. In Russia's unbreakable cycle, money yields power which

leads to more money. The country is a functioning democracy but

elections there do not revolve around the economy. Most taxes are

evaded by most taxpayers and half the gross national product is anyhow

underground. Ordinary people crave law and order - or, at least a

semblance thereof.

Hence Putin's rock idol popularity. He caters to the needs of the elite

by cozying up to the West and, in particular, to America - even as he

provides the lower classes with a sense of direction and security they

lacked since 1985. But Putin is a serendipitous president. He enjoys

the aftereffects of a sharply devalued, export-enhancing,

imports-depressing ruble and the vertiginous tripling of oil prices,

Russia's main foreign exchange generator.

The last years of Yeltsin have been so traumatic that the bickering

cogs and wheels of Russia's establishment united behind the only

vote-getter they could lay their hands on: Putin, an obscure politician

and former KGB officer. To a large extent, he proved to be an agreeable

puppet, concerned mostly with self-preservation and the imaginary

projection of illusory power.

Putin's great asset is his pragmatism and realistic assessment of the

shambles that Russia has become and of his own limitations. He has

turned himself into a kind of benevolent and enlightened arbiter among

feuding interests - and as the merciless and diligent executioner of

the decisions of the inner cabals of power.

Hitherto he kept everyone satisfied. But Iraq is his first real test.

Everyone demands commitments backed by actions. Both the Europeans and

the Americans want him to put his vote at the Security Council where

his mouth is. The armed services want him to oppose war in Iraq. The

intelligence services are divided. The Moslem population inside Russia

- and surrounding it on all sides - is restive and virulently

anti-American.

The oil industry is terrified of America' domination of the world's

second largest proven reserves - but also craves to do business in the

United States. Intellectuals and Russian diplomats worry about

America's apparent disregard for the world order spawned by the horrors

of World War II. The average Russian regards the Iraqi stalemate as an

internal American affair. "It is not our war", is a common refrain,

growing commoner.

Putin has played it admirably nimbly. Whether he ultimately succeeds in

this impossible act of balancing remains to be seen. The smart money

says he would. But if the last three years have taught us anything it

is that the smart money is often disastrously wrong.

Russia's Stealth Diplomacy

By: Dr. Sam Vaknin

Also published by United Press International (UPI)

Also Read

The Janus Look

Russia's Second Empire

Russia as a Creditor

The Chechen Theatre Ticket

Russia's Israeli Oil Bond

Russia's Idled Spies

Russia in 2003

Russia Straddles the Euro-Atlantic Divide

Russian Roulette - The Security Apparatus

Let My People Go - The Jackson-Vanik Controversy

Possibly irked by persistent American U-2 aerial spy missions above its

fringes, Russia fired yesterday, from a mobile launcher, a "Topol"

RS-12M Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM).

On Wednesday, Agriculture Minister Alexei Gordeyev, offered Iraq aid in

the form of wheat. The Russian Grain Union, the industry lobby group,

claims to have already provided the besieged country with half a

million tons of grain under the oil-for-food program.

Russia linked with Syria in declining to approve the new oil-for-food

draft resolution as long as it implied a regime change in Iraq. The

Duma - having failed to ratify a key nuclear treaty with the USA -

called to increase defense spending by at least 3.5 percent of gross

domestic product, or about $4 billion this year.

Only 28 percent of Russians polled now view the United States

favorably, compared with 68 percent a mere few months ago. A majority

of 55 percent disapprove of the USA in a country that was, until very

recently, by far the most pro-American in Europe. A Russian telecom,

Excom, is offering unlimited free phone calls to the White House to

protest U.S. "aggression".

Washington, on its part, has accused the Russian firm, Aviaconversiya,

of helping Iraqi forces to jam global positioning system (GPS) signals.

Other firms - including anti-tank Kornet missile manufacturer, KBP Tula

- have also been fingered for supplying Iraq with sensitive military

technologies.

These allegations were vehemently denied by President Vladimir Putin in

a phone call to Bush - and ridiculed by the companies ostensibly

involved. Russia exported c. $5 billion of military hardware and

another $2.6 billion in nuclear equipment and expertise last year,

mostly to India and China - triple the 1994 figure.

Russia and the United States have continually exchanged barbs over the

sale of fission technology to Iran. In retaliation, Atomic Energy

Minister, Alexander Rumyantsev, exposed an Anglo-German-Dutch deal with

the Iranians, which, he said, included the sale of uranium enrichment

centrifuges.

Is Putin reviving the Cold War to regain his nationalist credentials,

tarnished by the positioning, unopposed, of American troops in central

Asia, the unilateral American withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic

Missile (ABM) treaty and the expansion of NATO and the European Union

to Russia's borders?

Or, dependent as it is on energy exports, is Russia opposed to the war

because it fears an American monopoly on the second largest known

reserves of crude? Russia announced on Thursday that it would insist on

honoring all prewar contracts signed between Iraq and Russian oil

companies and worth of billions of dollars - and on the repayment of

$8-9 billion in Iraqi overdue debt to Russia.

According to Rosbalt, every drop of $1 in oil prices translates into

annual losses to the Russian treasury of $2 billion. Aggregate

corporate profits rose in January by one fifth year on year, mostly on

the strength of surging crude quotes. The Economist Intelligence Unit

expects this year's GDP to grow by 3.8 percent. Foreign exchange

reserves are stable at $54 billion.

Russian Roulette: Russia's Economy in Putin's Era · 第 6 / 7 段