There is a woman in this city who loathes me. There are people

everywhere who loathe me. I could name them; if they were in a book I

could turn to the exact page. People who loathe me do so for one of

two reasons: because I have frightened them because I have loathed

them (that is, made my death-face at them, which I shall not describe

as it might in this way lose some of its virtue) or because they are

interested in me and there seems no practical way of (or excuse for)

satisfying their interest. As to love, that is another matter--it has

nothing to do with either interest or fear. Love is simply a matter of

history, beginning like cancer from small incidents. There is nothing

further to be said about it.

But as to loathing: I feel an intense intimacy with those who have this

loathing interest in me. Further than this, I know what they mean, I

sympathize with them, I understand them. There should be a name (as

poetic as love) for this relationship between loather and loathed; it

is of the closest and more full of passion than incest.

To continue about this woman. What is to her irritation is to me

myself. She has therefore a very direct sense of me, as I have a very

direct sense of her, from being a kind of focus of her nervous system.

There is no sentiment, no irony between us, nothing but feeling: it is

an utterly serious relationship.

For if one eat my meat, though it be known

The meat was mine, the excrement is his own.

I forget in what context these words were used by Donne--but they

express very accurately how organic I feel this relationship to be. The

tie between us is as positive as the tie between twins is negative.

I think of her often. She is a painter--not a very good painter. I

understand this too: it is difficult to explain, but quite clear to

myself that one of the reasons I am attached to her is that she is

not a good painter. Also her clothes, which do not fit her well: this

again makes me even more attached to her. If she knew this she would be

exasperated against me all the more, and I should like it; not because

I want to annoy her but because this would make our relationship still

more intense. It would be terrible to me if we ever became friends;

like a divorce.

HUNGRY TO HEAR

Hungry to hear (like Jew-faces, kind but anticipating pain) they sit,

their ears raw. The conversation remains genteel, of motor cars: her

brother bought a car, he was having a six months’ vacation from an

Indian post, he should have known better than to buy an American car,

the value depreciates so, and _she_ (his sister) should not have lent

it to _her_ (her friend) even though it wasn’t her fault that the car

only did fifteen miles to the gallon after she returned it. A clear

situation like this, in which life is easy to understand, is cruel

to them. It leaves no scratches in the mind around which opinions,

sympathies, silly repetitions can fester and breed dreams and other

remote infections--too remote always to give serious pain. They long

to be fumbled, to have confusion and uncertainty make a confused and

uncertain end of them. There they sit, having pins-and-needles of

obscurity which they mistake for sensation. They open their newspapers:

‘I suppose it is foolish to spend all this time reading newspapers?

They are lying and dishonest and devoted to keeping a certain portion

of the population in ignorance and intellectual slavery? Or is it

foolish to take it so seriously? I shall go on reading them out of

sophistication?...’ Oh, go to hell.

IN A CAFÉ

This is the second time I have seen that girl here. What makes me

suspicious is that her manner has not changed. From her ears I should

say she is Polish. If this is so, is it not dangerous to drink coffee

here? Does anyone else think of this, I wonder? Yet why should I be

suspicious? And why should her manner not remain unchanged? She has

probably been cold, unhappy, unsuccessful or simply not alive ever

since I saw her last. Quite honestly I wish her success. The man who is

making sketches from pictures in the Art Magazine may find her little

Polish ears not repulsive. For good luck I turn away and do not look

at her again. I, who am neither sluttish nor genteel, like this place

because it has brown curtains of a shade I do not like. Everything,

even my position, which is not against the wall, is unsatisfactory and

pleasing: the men coming too hurriedly, the women too comfortably from

the lavatories, which are in an unnecessarily prominent position--all

this is disgusting; it puts me in a sordid good-humour. This attitude

I find to be the only way in which I can defy my own intelligence.

Otherwise I should become barbaric and be a modern artist and

intelligently mind everything, or I should become civilized and be a

Christian Scientist and intelligently mind nothing. Plainly the only

problem is to avoid that love of lost identity which drives so many

clever people to hold difficult points of view--by _difficult_ I mean

big, hungry, religious points of view which absorb their personality.

I for one am resolved to mind or not mind only to the degree where my

point of view is no larger than myself. I can thus have a great number

of points of view, like fingers, and which I can treat as I treat the

fingers of my hand, to hold my cup, to tap the table for me and fold

themselves away when I do not wish to think. If I fold them away now,

then I am sitting here all this time (without ordering a second cup)

because other people go on sitting here, not because I am thinking.

It is all indeed, I admit, rather horrible. But if I remain a person

instead of becoming a point of view, I have no contact with horror. If

I become a point of view, I become a force and am brought into direct

contact with horror, another force. As well set one plague of cats

loose upon another and expect peace of it. As a force I have power, as

a person virtue. All forces eventually commit suicide with their power,

while virtue in a person merely gives him a small though constant pain

from being continuously touched, looked at, mentally handled; a pain by

which he learns to recognize himself. Poems, being more like persons,

probably only squirm every time they are read and wrap themselves round

more tightly. Pictures and pieces of music, being more like forces, are

soon worn out by the power that holds them together. To me pictures and

music are always like stories told backwards: or like this I read in

the newspaper: ‘Up to the last she retained all her faculties and was

able to sign cheques.’

It is surely time for me to go and yet I do not in the least feel like

going. I have been through certain intimacies and small talk with

everything here, when I go out I shall have to begin all over again in

the street, in addition to wondering how many people are being run over

behind me; when I get home I shall turn on the light and say to myself

how glad I am it is winter, with no moths to kill. And I shall look

behind the curtain where my clothes hang and think that I have done

this ever since the homicidal red-haired boy confided his fear to me

and I was sorry for him and went to his room and did it for him. And my

first look round will be a Wuthering-Heights look; after that I shall

settle down to work and forget about myself.

I am well aware that we form, all together, one monster. But I refuse

to giggle and I refuse to be frightened and I refuse to be fierce. Nor

will I feed or be fed on. I will simply think of other things. I will

go now. Let them stare. I am well though eccentrically dressed.

FRAGMENT OF AN UNFINISHED NOVEL

What could I do but treat my secret as if it did not exist, that is,

as my mother did hers until she confided it to me? which was not

confiding, but a necessary explanation of the curious gift or curse

(you will decide which for yourself before many pages) that I had

from her (the flesh only knows how) when she put me into this world

fifty-four years ago in a carved bed made of an old sea-chest that she

had of her father (together with many other things) who was a Dutch Jew

of a family that had fled from Spain and made its fortune as merchants

and traders and in African mines and which disinherited him when he ran

away to sea from school and saw things in China which neither white man

nor Jew might see without death, but which long afterwards recalled him

when he was in America and too proud to accept the portion denied him

in his youth, which my mother never forgave him but continually during

her lifetime besought me to apply for in my own person, which was

pleasing and persuasive.

My mother, I say, broke her secret to no one, excepting me, and this

was not breaking it, since I had the same secret, and I broke my secret

to no one, which was either wise or foolish (I can’t say which) but not

wicked, for had I wished it was a thing that could go against no one

but myself (as you shall see). How my mother had it, she did not know,

although she was of the opinion that she caught it from a travelling

bookseller who secretly sold romances to the pupils of the French

convent in New Orleans where her father kept her--over the garden

wall. It could not be the books, she said, for they were as innocent

as the Bible, with no more rapes and indeed fewer mysteries. The

contamination, if it was such, must have been from his eyes, if at all,

which were long-lasting ones, she remembering them many days after each

visit and for a long time seeing through them, as it were. She knew

nothing about him but that he was Mexican, of a poor breed but of such

charm (he dressed in the Mexican manner) that she would have run away

with him had not her strange possession come over her at about this

time and changed the whole course of her life.

‘Perhaps,’ I suggested, when she told me this, ‘he used a charm against

you. It is known there are certain herbs to be found in Mexico which

may be used to cunning ends.’

‘That may indeed be so,’ my mother said, ‘for I remember he once gave

me a fine gold chain to wear on which was suspended an image of a pale

blue stone, and I could never make out what it represented, as it was

all twisted and seemed a different thing each time I looked at it, now

like a snake, now like a clenched hand or like a troll’s face.’

‘Surely,’ I cried, ‘it was this charm that brought the thing upon us.’

For I thought, if it was a charm that brought this thing on my mother,

it might be a charm that would take this thing from me; and for this

reason I have ever been one easily affected by superstitions of all

kinds and ready to put my faith in what is but circus farce to others,

a weakness that has been as great a source of misfortune to me as my

possession.

‘It might indeed have been so,’ replied my mother, ‘but I cannot be

sure. At about the same time Sister Mathilde began praying for me, as

if God had sent her against this journeyman for my sake. She prayed in

my room and soon she slept in my bed the better to protect me, and I

began strongly to dislike it for she sweated powerfully and loved me

more tenderly than is good for girlish sleep. Wherever I was between

these two I shall never know. If one was of God and the other of the

Devil, then there is a third power which exists to save the human soul

from both, I hesitate to say with what intentions or effects. For as I

was one morning sitting on my pot and enjoying innocent conversation

with myself, suddenly I looked up, feeling myself not alone. Think

how my modesty fainted to behold the room full of people all looking

intently (and kindly) at me. I covered my face with my hands. I dared

not rise.

‘“Never mind, child,” said a shrill voice at my ear that sounded like

an aunt’s, “it will soon be happily over.”

‘“Happily over!” I tried to shriek but could not, trying to rise and

button myself.

‘“Leave your dress alone, chicken, you could not look better,” said

another voice at my nose, a third cousin’s by its sound. Nor could I

have--I caught a glimpse of myself in a mirror just then, and I was a

bride! This is how I found myself married to Mr. Pink, whose calling

was jobs for which no name could be found, and could ask no questions

for shame, since the last I knew of myself was on a chamber-pot, but

only pretend to be possessed, as seemed reasonable in the principal

party of the event, of full knowledge of what was going on about me.’

This martyr’s discretion in my mother has ever been a noble example to

me in my own endurance of that cruel idiosyncrasy which she, to her

everlasting grief, passed on to me. ‘Never lose self-possession,’ she

continually besought me, ‘or contradict circumstances, which cannot

lie and which know you better than yourself.’ Dearest Mother! Shall

I blame her for that inheritance she gave me against her heart and

will and by which I had the blessing of her eternal (so long as she

lived) solicitude? Not to mention (petty recompense and enjoyment) the

liberty she gave me beyond all reasonable expectation I could have had

of remorseful indulgence from her, which included the privacy of her

papers which I could not read since she wrote always in bed and upon

brown paper, from sombreness of spirit, and the treasures her father

gave her out of spite to her mother, for bearing him a black child by

perfidy of blood or whoring, it exasperated him not to know which, and

of which, though all were mine from childhood, I loved and attached

to me but one shabby trifle, a totem six inches long that did me for

a doll while I remained a child and for a child when I became a woman

and dared not breed, confide, form honourable attachments or soften my

heart save to that which, being wooden, could not soften its heart to

me.

My mother, as I said, having once grasped her unspeakable peril,

resolved to protect herself with the means at hand, that is, to remain

Mrs. Pink, if she could, until she found herself something else. And

to further her security in this she formed a second painful resolve,

never while she could help it to leave her bed, thinking that she might

thus restrain her visitations or at least govern the place in which

they seized her. Alas! restrain them she could not, and alas! a bed (as

she learned too late) was more ungovernable than a chamber-pot, for in

this bed she got me, in a cruel lapse when Mr. Pink her husband was in

the Argentine collecting the names of common tropical plants for the

Secretary of State known in private life as a gifted maker of South

American tales, and when she must undoubtedly have been visited by

hundreds of Mr. Pink’s friends and relatives, Mr. Pink, who understood

my mother’s infirmity and never blamed it except as such, insisting

that it was his uncle the Chicago photographer who had nearly an

artist’s appreciation of the human form, of which my mother being half

Jew and perhaps a dash negro, was an exotic and irresistible example.

This unavoidable slip, of which I was a living and growing reminder,

never prejudiced Mr. Pink my mother’s husband against me, but on the

contrary seemed to stimulate his curiosity in me. He was a thin man,

but I think of a passionate imagination, and I wanted nothing. Nor was

he quite certain that it was his uncle the Chicago photographer, but in

the wistful hope that it might have been Prince Moredje, the famous

Balkan adventurer whom he used to decorate official banquets of which

he was responsible for the seating plan, he provided me with a riding

master though we lived in an unimproved flat in the rear and bought me

when I was quite young a green plumed hat from an auctioneer friend

of his who specialized in theatrical costumes. Himself he dressed

shabbily, as his profession required. I never knew him otherwise than

in his black and white checked suit and red tie, and it was one of the

sorrows of his life that he could not wear black, for he was a quiet

man, since his greatest attraction to his clients was that he was not

genteel, by which he seemed more efficient, mysterious, quaint and

criminal. My mother required very little beyond bed shawls, of which

she kept two, one for company and one for private, the company one

being pure white, that she might be thought of by visitors as a pale

object martyred to her bed and so not excite experiences; I have this

very shawl to thank for myself, which she was wearing when her sense

was suddenly transported in time and she found herself with me in her

womb and could make no denial or protest, and her white shawl on her

shoulders though in private, that is, alone with her husband Mr. Pink

who had just let himself in at the door from the Argentine, whence he

had come in all haste to embrace her, having been made anxious by

certain reports which his friends and relatives maliciously wrote

him of my mother. Her private shawl, a red cashmere, she consoled

herself in; she only wore it when she felt safe. In this shawl too

she consented to rise for her needs and melancholies. How often have

I come upon her standing in her shirt at the window, only half of her

decently covered, the rest of her naked and unhappy--a pair of pretty

buttocks that she could scarcely trust as far as the door and ready

to betray her at the least winking of her eye and plant her where she

must acknowledge her position by that she sat in it with them. It was

to our further mortification that our sad affliction only came over

my mother and me when we were sitting, an attitude that by its ease

soothes suspicion, and that we have never come to ourselves except in

this attitude, which may try dignity painfully, as I have reason to

know. ‘To find one’s feet’--how well, alas, do _I_ know the tragic

significance of that phrase....

WILLIAM AND DAISY: FRAGMENT OF A FINISHED NOVEL

William and Daisy lived in Cemetery Street. They had no connection

with each other except that they were not attracted by life or death;

so they lived in Cemetery Street. William was pessimistic because he

disliked life a little more than death, Daisy was optimistic because

she disliked death a little more than life. William had two memories:

one, that he had been familiar with harlots; two, that he had been

familiar with famous writers. These two memories mixed and he could

make nothing of them. Daisy had two memories: one, that she had once

been a harlot; two, that she had in her time known several famous

writers. These two memories mixed and she could make nothing of them.

They could make nothing of their memories except that they both felt

dignified and did not wish to end their days in a workhouse. So they

lived in Cemetery Street.

Every night Daisy went for a walk down Cemetery Street and said ‘What

a lovely night,’ and passed William on her walk and said ‘What a

coincidence’; and every night William, too, said ‘What a lovely night’

and ‘What a coincidence.’ They began to know each other’s thoughts and

were more bored with each other than ever.

They had their shoes mended by the same shoemaker. Each knew the

shoemaker had taken a girl to live with him behind the shop and then

thrown her into the street when his wife had learned about it. Yet each

continued to think him a nice man because they could not be bothered

to think him a mean man. They became more and more absolute in their

thoughts and habits until ...

I do not know what happened to them, nor do they.

AN ANONYMOUS BOOK

§1

An anonymous book for children only was published by an anonymous

publisher and anonymously praised in an anonymous journal. Moreover,

it imitated variously the style of each of the known writers of the

time, and this made the responsibility for its authorship all the

more impossible to place. For none of the known writers could in the

circumstances look guilty. But every one else did, so this made the

responsibility for its authorship all the more difficult to place.

The police had instructions to arrest all suspicious-looking persons.

But as every one except the known writers was under suspicion the

department of censorship gave orders that the known authors should be

put in prison to separate them from the rest of the population and that

every one else should be regarded as legally committed to freedom. ‘Did

you write it?’ every one was questioned at every street corner. And as

the answer was always ‘No’, the questioned person was always remanded

as a suspect.

The reasons why this book aroused the department of censorship were

these. One--it imitated (or seemed to imitate) the style of all

the known authors of the time and was therefore understood by the

authorities to be a political (or moral) satire. Two--it had no title

and was therefore feared by the authorities to be dealing under the

cover of obscurity with dangerous subjects. Three--its publisher could

not be traced and it was therefore believed by the authorities to have

been printed uncommercially. Four--it had no author and was therefore

suspected by the authorities of having been written by a dangerous

person. Five (and last)--it advertised itself as a book for children,

and was therefore concluded by the authorities to have been written

with the concealed design of corrupting adults. As the mystery grew,

the vigilance of the police grew, and the circulation of the book

grew: for the only way that its authorship could be discovered was by

increasing the number of people suspected, and this could only be done

by increasing the number of readers. The authorities secretly hoped to

arrive at the author by separating those who had read the book from

those who had not read it, and singling out from among the latter him

or her who pretended to know least about it.

All the stories in the book were about people who did not like the

world and who would have been glad to be somewhere else. Some were

irreligious, some were ungrateful, some were scornful, some were openly

rebellious, some were secretly rebellious, some were merely ironical,

some were merely bored. Many were too good, many were too bad. All were

disobedient, and all wanted to go away. Wanting to go away to somewhere

else did not mean wanting to go away to somewhere else with the rest

of the entire population of the world. It meant in all the stories

wanting to go away alone. All the stories in the book were about people

who wanted to go away to somewhere where they would be, no matter how

many other people they found there, the only one. All the people in the

book thought the world fit only for light, heat, moisture, electricity,

plants, the lower animals, and perhaps for occasional parties,

excursions, commemoration days, Sunday afternoons, exhibitions,

spectacles, concerts, sight-seeing and conversation. But none of them

thought it fit for higher creatures to live in permanently, because all

who were in it, they said, were the only one, and were thus objects of

hate, ridicule or mock-adoration for one another, being each by his

mind freakish and uncommon but by his brain natural and common.

Such was the philosophical import of this book. But its philosophical

import was got only if the reader had a taste for, a passion for,

a suspicion of, an obsession with, or instructions to look for

philosophical imports. Or if he shrank from stories. What was plain and

comprehensible before all philosophical imports was just stories. The

four upon which most suspicion was fixed were _The Flying Attic_, _The

Man Who Told Lies To His Mother_, _The Woman Who Loved an Engine_, and

_The Woman Who Was Bewitched By a Parallel_.

It was impossible to say particularly which story was written in the

style of which author. The effect of imitation that the book gave

was rather a mixed one; that is, it was generally and throughout a

witty, energetic, beautiful, simple, earnest, intricate, entertaining,

ironic, stern, fantastic, eloquent, modest, outspoken, matter-of-fact

and so-forth book, so that generally speaking it could not be read

but as a conglomerate imitation of the noted literary manners of the

time, of the well-known author who wrote so wittily, of the well-known

author who wrote so energetically, of the well-known author who wrote

so beautifully, of the well-known author who wrote so simply, of the

well-known author who wrote so earnestly, of the well-known author

who wrote so intricately, of the well-known author who wrote so

entertainingly, of the well-known author who wrote so ironically, of

the well-known author who wrote so sternly, of the well-known author

who wrote so fantastically, of the well-known author who wrote so

eloquently, of the well-known author who wrote so modestly, of the

well-known author who wrote so outspokenly, of the well-known author

who wrote so matter-of-factly, and of the well-known author who wrote

and-so-forthly.

Anarchism is not enough · 第 6 / 11 段