MEDITATION XXII. OF CATASTROPHES.

The word _Catastrophe_ is a term of literature which signifies the final

climax of a play.

To bring about a catastrophe in the drama which you are playing is a

method of defence which is as easy to undertake as it is certain to

succeed. In advising to employ it, we would not conceal from you its

perils.

The conjugal catastrophe may be compared to one of those high fevers

which either carry off a predisposed subject or completely restore his

health. Thus, when the catastrophe succeeds, it keeps a woman for years

in the prudent realms of virtue.

Moreover, this method is the last of all those which science has been

able to discover up to this present moment.

The massacre of St. Bartholomew, the Sicilian Vespers, the death of

Lucretia, the two embarkations of Napoleon at Frejus are examples of

political catastrophe. It will not be in your power to act on such a

large scale; nevertheless, within their own area, your dramatic climaxes

in conjugal life will not be less effective than these.

But since the art of creating a situation and of transforming it, by the

introduction of natural incidents, constitutes genius; since the return

to virtue of a woman, whose foot has already left some tracks upon

the sweet and gilded sand which mark the pathway of vice, is the most

difficult to bring about of all denouements, and since genius neither

knows it nor teaches it, the practitioner in conjugal laws feels

compelled to confess at the outset that he is incapable of reducing to

definite principles a science which is as changeable as circumstances,

as delusive as opportunity, and as indefinable as instinct.

If we may use an expression which neither Diderot, d’Alembert nor

Voltaire, in spite of every effort, have been able to engraft on our

language, a conjugal catastrophe _se subodore_ is scented from afar; so

that our only course will be to sketch out imperfectly certain conjugal

situations of an analogous kind, thus imitating the philosopher of

ancient time who, seeking in vain to explain motion, walked forward in

his attempt to comprehend laws which were incomprehensible.

A husband, in accordance with the principles comprised in our Meditation

on _Police_, will expressly forbid his wife to receive the visits of a

celibate whom he suspects of being her lover, and whom she has promised

never again to see. Some minor scenes of the domestic interior we leave

for matrimonial imaginations to conjure up; a husband can delineate them

much better than we can; he will betake himself in thought back to those

days when delightful longings invited sincere confidences and when

the workings of his policy put into motion certain adroitly handled

machinery.

Let us suppose, in order to make more interesting the natural scene

to which I refer, that you who read are a husband, whose carefully

organized police has made the discovery that your wife, profiting by

the hours devoted by you to a ministerial banquet, to which she probably

procured you an invitation, received at your house M. A----z.

Here we find all the conditions necessary to bring about the finest

possible of conjugal catastrophes.

You return home just in time to find your arrival has coincided with

that of M. A----z, for we would not advise you to have the interval

between acts too long. But in what mood should you enter? Certainly not

in accordance with the rules of the previous Meditation. In a rage then?

Still less should you do that. You should come in with good-natured

carelessness, like an absent-minded man who has forgotten his purse,

the statement which he has drawn up for the minister, his

pocket-handkerchief or his snuff-box.

In that case you will either catch two lovers together, or your wife,

forewarned by the maid, will have hidden the celibate.

Now let us consider these two unique situations.

But first of all we will observe that husbands ought always to be in a

position to strike terror in their homes and ought long before to make

preparations for the matrimonial second of September.

Thus a husband, from the moment that his wife has caused him to perceive

certain _first symptoms_, should never fail to give, time after time,

his personal opinion on the course of conduct to be pursued by a husband

in a great matrimonial crisis.

“As for me,” you should say, “I should have no hesitation in killing the

man I caught at my wife’s feet.”

With regard to the discussion that you will thus give rise to, you will

be led on to aver that the law ought to have given to the husband, as it

did in ancient Rome, the right of life and death over his children, so

that he could slay those who were spurious.

These ferocious opinions, which really do not bind you to anything, will

impress your wife with salutary terror; you will enumerate them lightly,

even laughingly--and say to her, “Certainly, my dear, I would kill you

right gladly. Would you like to be murdered by me?”

A woman cannot help fearing that this pleasantry may some day become a

very serious matter, for in these crimes of impulse there is a certain

proof of love; and then women who know better than any one else how

to say true things laughingly at times suspect their husbands of this

feminine trick.

When a husband surprises his wife engaged in even innocent conversation

with her lover, his face still calm, should produce the effect

mythologically attributed to the celebrated Gorgon.

In order to produce a favorable catastrophe at this juncture, you

must act in accordance with the character of your wife, either play a

pathetic scene a la Diderot, or resort to irony like Cicero, or rush to

your pistols loaded with a blank charge, or even fire them off, if you

think that a serious row is indispensable.

A skillful husband may often gain a great advantage from a scene

of unexaggerated sentimentality. He enters, he sees the lover and

transfixes him with a glance. As soon as the celibate retires, he falls

at the feet of his wife, he declaims a long speech, in which among other

phrases there occurs this:

“Why, my dear Caroline, I have never been able to love you as I should!”

He weeps, and she weeps, and this tearful catastrophe leaves nothing to

be desired.

We would explain, apropos of the second method by which the catastrophe

may be brought about, what should be the motives which lead a husband

to vary this scene, in accordance with the greater or less degree of

strength which his wife’s character possesses.

Let us pursue this subject.

If by good luck it happens that your wife has put her lover in a place

of concealment, the catastrophe will be very much more successful.

Even if the apartment is not arranged according to the principles

prescribed in the Meditation, you will easily discern the place into

which the celibate has vanished, although he be not, like Lord Byron’s

Don Juan, bundled up under the cushion of a divan. If by chance your

apartment is in disorder, you ought to have sufficient discernment to

know that there is only one place in which a man could bestow himself.

Finally, if by some devilish inspiration he has made himself so small

that he has squeezed into some unimaginable lurking-place (for we may

expect anything from a celibate), well, either your wife cannot help

casting a glance towards this mysterious spot, or she will pretend to

look in an exactly opposite direction, and then nothing is easier for a

husband than to set a mouse-trap for his wife.

The hiding-place being discovered, you must walk straight up to the

lover. You must meet him face to face!

And now you must endeavor to produce a fine effect. With your face

turned three-quarters towards him, you must raise your head with an air

of superiority. This attitude will enhance immensely the effect which

you aim at producing.

The most essential thing to do at this moment, is to overwhelm the

celibate by some crushing phrase which you have been manufacturing all

the time; when you have thus floored him, you will coldly show him the

door. You will be very polite, but as relentless as the executioner’s

axe, and as impassive as the law. This freezing contempt will already

probably have produced a revolution in the mind of your wife. There

must be no shouts, no gesticulations, no excitement. “Men of high social

rank,” says a young English author, “never behave like their inferiors,

who cannot lose a fork without sounding the alarm throughout the whole

neighborhood.”

When the celibate has gone, you will find yourself alone with your wife,

and then is the time when you must subjugate her forever.

You should therefore stand before her, putting on an air whose affected

calmness betrays the profoundest emotion; then you must choose from

among the following topics, which we have rhetorically amplified, and

which are most congenial to your feelings: “Madame,” you must say, “I

will speak to you neither of your vows, nor of my love; for you have too

much sense and I have too much pride to make it possible that I should

overwhelm you with those execrations, which all husbands have a right

to utter under these circumstances; for the least of the mistakes that I

should make, if I did so, is that I would be fully justified. I will not

now, even if I could, indulge either in wrath or resentment. It is not

I who have been outraged; for I have too much heart to be frightened

by that public opinion which almost always treats with ridicule and

condemnation a husband whose wife has misbehaved. When I examine my

life, I see nothing there that makes this treachery deserved by me,

as it is deserved by many others. I still love you. I have never been

false, I will not say to my duty, for I have found nothing onerous in

adoring you, but not even to those welcome obligations which sincere

feeling imposes upon us both. You have had all my confidence and you

have also had the administration of my fortune. I have refused you

nothing. And now this is the first time that I have turned to you a

face, I will not say stern, but which is yet reproachful. But let us

drop this subject, for it is of no use for me to defend myself at

a moment when you have proved to me with such energy that there is

something lacking in me, and that I am not intended by nature to

accomplish the difficult task of rendering you happy. But I would ask

you, as a friend speaking to a friend, how could you have the heart to

imperil at the same time the lives of three human creatures: that of the

mother of my children, who will always be sacred to me; that of the

head of the family; and finally of him--who loves--[she perhaps at these

words will throw herself at your feet; you must not permit her to do so;

she is unworthy of kneeling there]. For you no longer love me, Eliza.

Well, my poor child [you must not call her _my poor child_ excepting

when the crime has not been committed]--why deceive ourselves? Why do

you not answer me? If love is extinguished between a married couple,

cannot friendship and confidence still survive? Are we not two

companions united in making the same journey? Can it be said that during

the journey the one must never hold out his hand to the other to raise

up a comrade or to prevent a comrade’s fall? But I have perhaps said too

much and I am wounding your pride--Eliza! Eliza!”

Now what the deuce would you expect a woman to answer? Why a catastrophe

naturally follows, without a single word.

In a hundred women there may be found at least a good half dozen of

feeble creatures who under this violent shock return to their husbands

never perhaps again to leave them, like scorched cats that dread the

fire. But this scene is a veritable alexipharmaca, the doses of which

should be measured out by prudent hands.

For certain women of delicate nerves, whose souls are soft and timid, it

would be sufficient to point out the lurking-place where the lover lies,

and say: “M. A----z is there!” [at this point shrug your shoulders].

“How can you thus run the risk of causing the death of two worthy

people? I am going out; let him escape and do not let this happen

again.”

But there are women whose hearts, too violently strained in these

terrible catastrophes, fail them and they die; others whose blood

undergoes a change, and they fall a prey to serious maladies; others

actually go out of their minds. These are examples of women who take

poison or die suddenly--and we do not suppose that you wish the death of

the sinner.

Nevertheless, the most beautiful and impressionable of all the queens

of France, the charming and unfortunate Mary Stuart, after having seen

Rizzio murdered almost in her arms, fell in love, nevertheless, with

the Earl of Bothwell; but she was a queen and queens are abnormal in

disposition.

We will suppose, then, that the woman whose portrait adorns our first

Meditation is a little Mary Stuart, and we will hasten to raise the

curtain for the fifth act in this grand drama entitled _Marriage_.

A conjugal catastrophe may burst out anywhere, and a thousand

incidents which we cannot describe may give it birth. Sometimes it is a

handkerchief, as in _Othello_; or a pair of slippers, as in _Don

Juan_; sometimes it is the mistake of your wife, who cries out--“Dear

Alphonse!” instead of “Dear Adolph!” Sometimes a husband, finding out

that his wife is in debt, will go and call on her chief creditor, and

will take her some morning to his house, as if by chance, in order to

bring about a catastrophe. “Monsieur Josse, you are a jeweler and you

sell your jewels with a readiness which is not equaled by the readiness

of your debtors to pay for them. The countess owes you thirty thousand

francs. If you wish to be paid to-morrow [tradesmen should always be

visited at the end of the month] come to her at noon; her husband will

be in the chamber. Do not attend to any sign which she may make to

impose silence upon you--speak out boldly. I will pay all.”

So that the catastrophe in the science of marriage is what figures are

in arithmetic.

All the principles of higher conjugal philosophy, on which are based the

means of defence outlined in this second part of our book, are derived

from the nature of human sentiments, and we have found them in different

places in the great book of the world. Just as persons of intellect

instinctively apply the laws of taste whose principles they would find

difficulty in formulating, so we have seen numberless people of deep

feeling employing with singular felicity the precepts which we are about

to unfold, yet none of them consciously acted on a definite system.

The sentiments which this situation inspired only revealed to them

incomplete fragments of a vast system; just as the scientific men of the

sixteenth century found that their imperfect microscopes did not enable

them to see all the living organisms, whose existence had yet been

proved to them by the logic of their patient genius.

We hope that the observations already made in this book, and in those

which follow, will be of a nature to destroy the opinion which frivolous

men maintain, namely that marriage is a sinecure. According to our view,

a husband who gives way to ennui is a heretic, and more than that, he is

a man who lives quite out of sympathy with the marriage state, of whose

importance he has no conception. In this connection, these Meditations

perhaps will reveal to very many ignorant men the mysteries of a world

before which they stand with open eyes, yet without seeing it.

We hope, moreover, that these principles when well applied will produce

many conversions, and that among the pages that separate this second

part from that entitled _Civil War_ many tears will be shed and many

vows of repentance breathed.

Yes, among the four hundred thousand honest women whom we have so

carefully sifted out from all the European nations, we indulge the

belief that there are a certain number, say three hundred thousand, who

will be sufficiently self-willed, charming, adorable, and bellicose to

raise the standard of _Civil War_.

To arms then, to arms!

The Physiology of Marriage, Complete · 第 43 / 90 题