The New View of Matter

Up to the point we have reached, then, we see what the new view of

Matter is. Every atom of matter, of whatever kind throughout the whole

universe, is built up of electrons in conjunction with a nucleus. From

the smallest atom of all--the atom of hydrogen--which consists of one

electron, rotating round a positively charged nucleus, to a heavy

complicated atom, such as the atom of gold, constituted of many

electrons and a complex nucleus, _we have only to do with positive and

negative units of electricity_. The electron and its nucleus are

particles of electricity. All Matter, therefore, is nothing but a

manifestation of electricity. The atoms of matter, as we saw, combine

and form molecules. Atoms and molecules are the bricks out of which

nature has built up everything; ourselves, the earth, the stars, the

whole universe.

But more than bricks are required to build a house. There are other

fundamental existences, such as the various forms of energy, which give

rise to several complex problems. And we have also to remember, that

there are more than eighty distinct elements, each with its own definite

type of atom. We shall deal with energy later. Meanwhile it remains to

be said that, although we have discovered a great deal about the

electron and the constitution of matter, and that while the physicists

of our own day seem to see a possibility of explaining positive and

negative electricity, the nature of them both is unknown. There exists

the theory that the particles of positive and negative electricity,

which make up the atoms of matter, are points or centres of disturbances

of some kind in a universal ether, and that all the various forms of

energy are, in some fundamental way, aspects of the same primary entity

which constitutes matter itself.

But the discovery of the property of radio-activity has raised many

other interesting questions, besides that which we have just dealt with.

In radio-active elements, such as uranium for example, the element is

breaking down; in what we call radio-activity we have a manifestation of

the spontaneous change of elements. What is really taking place is a

transmutation of one element into another, from a heavier to a lighter.

The element uranium spontaneously becomes radium, and radium passes

through a number of other stages until it, in turn, becomes lead. Each

descending element is of lighter atomic weight than its predecessor. The

changing process, of course, is a very slow one. It may be that all

matter is radio-active, or can be made so. This raises the question

whether all the matter in the universe may not undergo disintegration.

There is, however, another side of the question, which the discovery of

radio-activity has brought to light, and which has effected a revolution

in our views. We have seen that in radio-active substances the elements

are breaking down. Is there a process of building up at work? If the

more complicated atoms are breaking down into simpler forms, may there

not be a converse process--a building up from simpler elements to more

complicated elements? It is probably the case that both processes are at

work.

There are some eighty-odd chemical elements on the earth to-day: are

they all the outcome of an inorganic evolution, element giving rise to

element, going back and back to some primeval stuff from which they

were all originally derived infinitely long ago? Is there an evolution

in the inorganic world which may be going on, parallel to that of the

evolution of living things; or is organic evolution a continuation of

inorganic evolution? We have seen what evidence there is of this

inorganic evolution in the case of the stars. We cannot go deeply into

the matter here, nor has the time come for any direct statement that can

be based on the findings of modern investigation. Taking it altogether

the evidence is steadily accumulating, and there are authorities who

maintain that already the evidence of inorganic evolution is convincing

enough. The heavier atoms would appear to behave as though they were

evolved from the lighter. The more complex forms, it is supposed, have

_evolved_ from the simpler forms. Moseley's discovery, to which

reference has been made, points to the conclusion that the elements are

built up one from another.

§ 8

The Outline of Science, Vol. 1 (of 4) A Plain Story Simply Told · 第 430 / 470 题