Changes in the Animal Life of a Country

Nothing gives us a more convincing impression of evolution in being than

a succession of pictures of the animal life of a country in different

ages. Dr. James Ritchie, a naturalist of distinction, has written a

masterly book, _The Influence of Man on Animal Life in Scotland_ (1920),

in which we get this succession of pictures. "Within itself," he says,

"a fauna is in a constant state of uneasy restlessness, an assemblage of

creatures which in its parts ebbs and flows as one local influence or

another plays upon it." There are temporary and local changes, endless

disturbances and readjustments of the "balance of nature." One year

there is a plague of field-voles, perhaps next year "grouse disease" is

rife; in one place there is huge increase of starlings, in another place

of rabbits; here cockchafers are in the ascendant, and there the moles

are spoiling the pasture. "But while the parts fluctuate, the fauna as a

whole follows a path of its own. As well as internal tides which swing

to and fro about an average level, there is a drift which carries the

fauna bodily along an 'irretraceable course.'" This is partly due to

considerable changes of climate, for climate calls the tune to which

living creatures dance, but it is also due to new departures among the

animals themselves. We need not go back to the extinct animals and lost

faunas of past ages--for Britain has plenty of relics of these--which

"illustrate the reality of the faunal drift," but it may be very useful,

in illustration of evolution in being, to notice what has happened in

Scotland since the end of the Great Ice Age.

Some nine thousand years ago or more, certain long-headed,

square-jawed, short-limbed, but agile hunters and fishermen, whom we

call Neolithic Man, established themselves in Scotland. What was the

state of the country then?

It was a country of swamps, low forests of birch, alder, and willow,

fertile meadows, and snow-capped mountains. Its estuaries penetrated

further inland than they now do, and the sea stood at the level of

the Fifty-Foot Beach. On its plains and in its forests roamed many

creatures which are strange to the fauna of to-day--the Elk and the

Reindeer, Wild Cattle, the Wild Boar and perhaps Wild Horses, a

fauna of large animals which paid toll to the European Lynx, the

Brown Bear and the Wolf. In all likelihood, the marshes resounded to

the boom of the Bittern and the plains to the breeding calls of the

Crane and the Great Bustard.

Such is Dr. Ritchie's initial picture.

[Illustration: LIFE-HISTORY OF A FROG

1, Before hatching; 2, newly hatched larvæ hanging on to water-weed; 3,

with external gills; 4, external gills are covered over and are

absorbed; 5, limbless larva about a month old with internal gills; 6,

tadpole with hind-legs, about two months old; 7, with the fore-limbs

emerging; 8, with all four legs free; 9, a young frog, about three

months old, showing the almost complete absorption of the tail and the

change of the tadpole mouth into a frog mouth.]

[Illustration: _Photo: J. J. Ward. F.E.S._

HIND-LEG OF WHIRLIGIG BEETLE WHICH HAS BECOME BEAUTIFULLY MODIFIED FOR

AQUATIC LOCOMOTION

The flattened tips form an expanding "fan" or paddle, which opens and

closes with astonishing rapidity. The closing of the "fan," like the

"feathering" of an oar, reduces friction when the leg is being moved

forwards for the next stroke.]

[Illustration: THE BIG ROBBER-CRAB (_Birgus Latro_), THAT CLIMBS THE

COCO-NUT PALM AND BREAKS OFF THE NUTS

It occurs on islands in the Indian Ocean and Pacific, and is often found

far above sea-level. It is able to breathe dry air. One is seen emerging

from its burrow, which is often lined with coco-nut fibre. The empty

coco-nut shell is sometimes used by the Robber-Crab for the protection

of its tail.]

Now what happened in this kingdom of Caledonia which Neolithic Man had

found? He began to introduce domesticated animals, and that meant a

thinning of the ranks of predacious creatures. "Safety first" was the

dangerous motto in obedience to which man exterminated the lynx, the

brown bear, and the wolf. Other creatures, such as the great auk, were

destroyed for food, and others like the marten for their furs. Small

pests were destroyed to protect the beginnings of agriculture; larger

animals like the boar were hunted out of existence; others, like the

pearl-bearing river-mussels, yielded to subtler demands. No doubt there

was protection also--protection for sport, for utility, for æsthetic

reasons, and because of humane sentiments; even wholesome superstitions

have safeguarded the robin redbreast and the wren. There were

introductions too--the rabbit for utility, the pheasant for sport, and

the peacock for amenity. And every introduction, every protection, every

killing out had its far-reaching influences.

But if we are to picture the evolution going on, we must think also of

man's indirect interference with animal life. He destroyed the forests,

he cultivated the wild, he made bridges, he allowed aliens, like rats

and cockroaches, to get in unawares. Of course, he often did good, as

when he drained swamps and got rid of the mosquitoes which once made

malaria rife in Scotland.

What has been the net result? Not, as one might think for a moment, a

reduction in the _number_ of different kinds of animals. Fourteen or so

species of birds and beasts have been banished from Scotland since man

interfered, but as far as numbers go they have been more than replaced

by deliberate introductions like fallow deer, rabbit, squirrel, and

pheasant, and by accidental introductions like rats and cockroaches. But

the change is rather in _quality_ than in quantity; the smaller have

taken the place of the larger, rather paltry pigmies of noble giants.

Thus we get a vivid idea that evolution, especially when man interferes,

is not necessarily progressive. That depends on the nature of the sieves

with which the living materials are sifted. As Dr. Ritchie well says,

the standard of the wild fauna as regards size has fallen and is

falling, and it is not in size only that there is loss, there is a

deterioration of quality. "For how can the increase of Rabbits and

Sparrows and Earthworms and Caterpillars, and the addition of millions

of Rats and Cochroaches and Crickets and Bugs, ever take the place of

those fine creatures round the memories of which the glamour of

Scotland's past still plays--the Reindeer and the Elk, the Wolf, the

Brown Bear, the Lynx, and the Beaver, the Bustard, the Crane, the

Bumbling Bittern, and many another, lost or disappearing." Thus we see

again that evolution is going on.

§ 3

The Outline of Science, Vol. 1 (of 4) A Plain Story Simply Told · 第 324 / 470 题