By the treaty of October 24, 1860, the Chinese paid an indemnity of

eight million taels. The right of Europeans to travel in the interior

was granted, and freedom guaranteed to the preaching of Christianity.

By the customs tariff agreed upon the import of opium was legalized.

In the course of 1861 British, French, and Russian legations were

permanently established at Peking, and in the following years the same

right was conceded to other European nations. By treaties with Russia

in the same year China ceded all its territory north of the Amur to

Russia, and in this territory Vladivostock was founded.

Good relations having been established, the Chinese Government, with

the assistance of Gordon, carried out a successful campaign against the

Taipings, and the Manchu dynasty was restored.

Remarks:

This was the opening of the door into China, and from henceforth the

Western Powers began to compete for commercial and territorial prizes

in the Chinese Empire.

AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

1861–1865

Belligerents:

The Northern states of North America.

The Southern states of North America.

Cause:

The cultivation of cotton progressed under very different conditions

in the North and South. In the North the white man had to work

vigorously to overcome the disadvantages of the soil. In the South

the negro labourer could be used with profit to his owner, and was

held as a slave. By 1860 the thirteen original states were enlarged to

thirty-three. The territories of the North-east found their prosperity

in free labour, the South throve on the cotton crop and continued to

exploit negro labour. The Southern states gradually combined together,

and between 1830 and 1850 gained a predominant voice in the control

of Federal affairs. The North also became consolidated, and a strong

movement against slavery grew up, chiefly owing to the efforts of

W. Lloyd Garrison. A new Republican party gained strength in its

opposition to the dominating differences of the South, and sectional

political differences were intensified. The prospect of the abolition

of slavery was not the only issue. The South resented the idea that

coercive measures might be used to keep the lower South in the Union.

They believed this to be an attack on the doctrine of the sovereignty

of states. A widespread feeling in favour of secession grew up.

Occasion:

The Republican party triumphed at the election, and Abraham Lincoln

became President in November, 1860. South Carolina seceded, ten other

states followed, and the Confederate States were established under

the Presidency of Jefferson Davis. The attack on Fort Sumter by the

Confederates on April 4, 1861, made war inevitable.

Course of the War:

The North was defeated at Bull Run in July 1861, but captured forts

Henry and Donelson in 1862, and gained a victory at Shiloh. At

Richmond, and later at Fredericksburg, the North was defeated. Lincoln

issued his proclamation of Emancipation on January 1, 1863. The

South, under Lee, were defeated in the greatest battle of the war at

Gettysburg, on July 4th. In 1864 there were further victories for the

North under Grant at Spottsylvania and Coldharbour; and Atlanta and

Savanah were captured. In 1865 Petersburg and Richmond were evacuated

by the Confederates and Lee surrendered. On May 26th the war came to an

end, after a desperate struggle of nearly four years.

Political Result:

The Union was restored and slavery abolished. Lincoln was assassinated

on April 14, 1865, and his wise counsel was lost therefore for the

difficult work of reconstruction which followed the war.

Remarks:

Great Britain declared neutrality at the outset, and thereby

implicitly, though not explicitly, recognized the Southern Confederacy

as a belligerent Power. There was much sympathy with the South among

the governing class, but the people were on the side of the North. The

Trent affair brought Great Britain and America very near to war. (See

_Treaty of Washington_, p. 94.)

FRENCH EXPEDITION IN MEXICO

1862–1867

Belligerents:

France.

Mexican Republicans.

Cause:

From 1789, the date of the first conspiracy against Spain, down to

1857, when a Constitution was promulgated, Mexico was in a state of

permanent warfare. In 1861 France, Spain, and Great Britain adopted

joint measures against the republic in order to get better protection

for their subjects and their property. In 1862 Great Britain and Spain

withdrew. But Napoleon III conceived the project of establishing a

monarchy in Mexico under his patronage, and so increasing French

ascendancy beyond the Atlantic.

Occasion:

The financial misdemeanours of the Mexican Government were made the

pretext for the advance of French troops into Mexico in 1862.

Course of the War:

The French force was checked in May 1862, and further reinforcements

were sent out. They advanced again in February 1863, and entered Mexico

City in June. A Provisional Government was established, and the crown

was offered to Maximilian of Austria, who accepted it and reached

Mexico City in June 1864. Juarez, the republican leader, was driven

into the extreme north of the country. But his resistance was by no

means overcome. Napoleon III bound himself to keep a force in Mexico

for the protection of Maximilian. In 1865, on the restoration of peace

after the Civil War in the United States, the Government of Washington

refused to acknowledge any authority in Mexico but that of Juarez. The

French were obliged to withdraw in 1867, and Maximilian was left to his

fate. The Juarists got the upper hand, and Maximilian was executed.

Political Result:

Juarez, as President of Mexico, was succeeded by Diaz in 1877; and

order was maintained for a generation.

Remarks:

This foolish enterprise damaged the reputation of Napoleon III. He was

regarded as a political adventurer, and became increasingly unpopular

in his own country.

BRAZILIAN WAR

1864–1870

Belligerents:

Brazil, Uruguay, Argentine Republic.

Paraguay.

Cause:

Brazil was part of the Portuguese possessions until 1822, when it

declared its independence. The Emperors Pedro I and II had frequent

trouble not only with the republican movement in Brazil itself, but

with the neighbouring states, with whom they were constantly at war. In

1855 Pedro II sent a squadron up the Parana to adjust several questions

outstanding with the republic of Paraguay. Although certain rights were

granted to Brazil the Government of Paraguay threw every obstacle in

the way to prevent a settlement.

Occasion:

In 1864 Lopez, the ambitious dictator of Paraguay, without declaring

war, captured a Brazilian vessel, and invaded Brazil and the Argentine.

Uruguay joined them in a triple alliance of defence against Paraguay.

Course of the War:

Owing to the strong natural position of Paraguay, and the obstinacy of

Lopez, the war was drawn out with constant fighting and great sacrifice

of life in addition to vast expenditure, until 1870, when it was

terminated by the capture and death of Lopez.

Political Result:

External troubles ceased, but the republican movement gained in

strength until 1889, when Pedro was deposed and a republic declared in

Brazil.

Remarks:

The slaughter in this war was so terrific that the population of

Paraguay was reduced from 1,337,439 to 221,079.

This is only one example of the very frequent disturbances, both

internal and external, in the South American continent during the

course of the century.

THE DANISH WAR

1864

Belligerents:

Denmark.

Prussia and Austria.

Cause:

The strong revival of nationalism in Germany after the Napoleonic Wars

spread to the German inhabitants of the Duchies of Schleswig Holstein,

who desired in 1848 to be incorporated as a single constitutional

state in the German Federation. The Danish crown could be inherited by

female heirs, but in the Duchies the Salic law had never been repealed.

This made complications with regard to the succession. Frederick VII

of Denmark endeavoured to preserve the Duchy as an integral part of

Denmark. An insurrection broke out, and Prussia intervened by marching

troops into Holstein. Under pressure from other Powers the King of

Prussia signed a convention at Malmoe practically yielding all the

Danish demands, and in 1850, by the _Treaty of Berlin_, peace was

restored between Prussia and Denmark, but without any settlement of

the vexed question. In 1852 Great Britain intervened with a proposal

without success. In 1854 the King of Denmark promulgated special

Constitutions for the Duchies as well as a common Constitution for the

whole Monarchy. The German Confederation rejected this as the Diets of

the Duchies had not been consulted. The question became of European

interest: its complexity prevented any settlement being reached.

Bismarck alone was quite determined on eventual annexation, and Denmark

was equally determined not to yield.

Occasion:

After further diplomatic disputes Austrian and Prussian troops entered

Schleswig in February 1864.

Course of the War:

The allied troops broke through the frontier fortifications and

occupied the greater part of the Danish mainland. The Danes were

overthrown in the island of Alsen, and the German flag carried to the

northern extremity of Denmark. A conference was opened in London, April

1864, but the negotiations broke down and the war continued.

Political Result:

Eventually, by the _Treaty of Vienna_, October 30, 1864, the King of

Denmark ceded the rights in the whole of Schleswig Holstein to the

Sovereigns of Austria and Prussia jointly.

Remarks:

This was more a diplomatic war than a military war. The conflict was

between retention and annexation, and little regard was paid on any

side to the desires of the inhabitants of the disputed territory.

Although by the _Treaty of London_ of 1852 the Powers, including Great

Britain, had acknowledged as permanent the principle of the integrity

of the Danish Monarchy no steps were taken by them to maintain that

principle. The settlement did nothing to prevent the outbreak of war

between Prussia and Austria two years later, when Schleswig Holstein

was again one of the bones of contention.

THE AUSTRO-PRUSSIAN WAR

1866

Belligerents:

Prussia and some of the smaller North German States and Italy.

Austria and the other German States.

Cause:

From 1848 onwards in all the projects for a united Germany there was

keen rivalry between Prussia and Austria. Each resisted the domination

of the other in any new Empire, and the South German states were

inclined to side with Austria against Prussian supremacy. This state of

affairs prevented any final scheme from being agreed to. At the same

time there were serious differences between Austria and Italy, who was

Prussia’s ally. Bismarck made up his mind that Austria must be expelled

by force of arms from the German Federation. He was an ardent supporter

of the House of Hohenzollern.

Occasion:

Austria supported Schleswig Holstein in their struggle for independence

against Prussia after the conclusion of the Danish War. An attempted

congress of neutrals failed. Austria called on the Diet of Frankfort

to take the affairs of Schleswig Holstein into its own hands, and

demanded and obtained the mobilization of the whole Federal armies.

Prussia declared that this action made an end of the Federal Union,

and submitted a new plan for the organization of Germany, which was

refused. Diplomatic relations were broken off June 12, 1866.

Course of the War:

Hanover and Hesse Cassel were conquered by Prussia, the Austrians were

defeated at Königgrätz, July 3, 1866, and the Prussians pushed forward

in sight of Vienna. The Austrians defeated the Italians on land at

Custozza, and by sea at Lissa.

Political Result:

Napoleon III offered mediation, which was accepted. The _Treaty of

Prague_, August 23, 1866. Prussia annexed Hanover, Nassau, Hesse

Cassel, and Frankfort: Germany north of the Main together with Saxony

was included in a Federation under Prussia: the Southern states were

left independent. Prussian sovereignty over Schleswig Holstein was

recognized. Austria withdrew completely from German affairs.

Remarks:

Napoleon III had attempted, by dividing Germany in two, to put an

obstacle in the way of German unity. His clumsy diplomacy was greatly

disapproved of in France. By preventing a final settlement he made the

recurrence of war inevitable.

BRITISH EXPEDITION IN ABYSSINIA

1867–1868

Belligerents:

Great Britain.

Abyssinia.

Cause:

From 1855 Abyssinia came under the powerful rule of the Emperor

Theodore. He subdued the neighbouring kingdoms of Tigré and Shoa, and

took Menelek, son of the ruler of Tigré, to be trained in his service.

He ravaged the surrounding country, and oppressed his own people. In

1864 there was an interchange of letters between Theodore and the

British Government, out of which difficulties arose.

Occasion:

The British Consul and his staff, and subsequently a British emissary,

were imprisoned in Magdala and put in chains. Their release was

demanded, but the Emperor paid no attention, and the British Government

decided they must have recourse to arms.

Course of the War:

A British force under Sir Robert Napier landed in January 1868, a

march of three hundred miles was undertaken through the mountainous

districts, and, after a fierce engagement, Magdala was stormed and

taken on April 13, 1868. The Emperor committed suicide, and his son was

taken to England, where he died. The British troops left the country in

May 1868.

Political Result:

The ruler of Tigré succeeded Theodore under the title of King John, and

on his death, in 1889, Menelek became Emperor.

Remarks:

After this the Italians came on to the scene with ambitions in this

part of Africa (see p. 74), but Abyssinia remained an independent

kingdom. In the various expeditions against the Mullah in Somaliland

(1902–4) the Abyssinians co-operated with Great Britain.

THE FRANCO-GERMAN WAR

1870–1871

Belligerents:

France.

Prussia and ten other German States.

Cause:

For some years previously there had been increasing friction between

France and Prussia, owing chiefly to Louis Napoleon’s apprehensions

as to the possibility of closer union between Prussia and the South

German states, his repeated endeavours to extend the Eastern frontier

of France, and Bismarck’s counter-moves to frustrate his designs. The

desire also for a united Germany was growing stronger, and Bismarck

believed it could not be completed without a conflict with France.

Occasion:

The candidature of Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern Sigmaringen for

the throne of Spain in 1870 was resented by France as calculated to

bring Spain under the influence of Prussia. King William of Prussia,

on representations from France, persuaded Prince Leopold to withdraw,

but refused firmly but politely a guarantee against the renewal of the

candidature. Bismarck published a telegram conveying the impression

that the French Ambassador, Benedetti, had been insulted by the King at

Ems on the occasion of the refusal. This infuriated public opinion in

France, the Empress Eugénie actively used her influence, and Napoleon

agreed to a declaration of war on July 14, 1870.

Course of the War:

In the war, which lasted from July 1870 to February 1871, the

ill-organized and badly led French troops could make no stand against

the well-prepared armies of Germany. The French were defeated at Wörth,

August 6th; Metz, August 7th; Marsla Tour, August 17th; Gravelotte,

August 18th. Paris was besieged: Louis Napoleon capitulated at Sedan,

September 2nd; Strasburg fell, September 28th; Bazaine capitulated at

Metz, October 27th; and the Germans entered Paris on January 28, 1871.

Political Result:

By the _Treaty of Frankfort_, May 10, 1871, Alsace and half Lorraine

(with Metz) were ceded to Germany, and an indemnity of 200 millions was

exacted from France. The King of Prussia was proclaimed at Versailles

German Emperor. France was declared a republic, and Napoleon eventually

retired into exile in England.

Remarks:

The dictation of terms and the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine entirely

prevented friendly relations from being established between the two

countries in the succeeding years. France, by getting rid of the

corrupt and incompetent government of Napoleon III, began to recuperate

from this time onward. Germany, having reached the ideal of unity,

proceeded gradually to join in the competition for commercial expansion

and Imperial aggrandizement.

THE ASHANTI WAR

1873–1874

Belligerents:

Great Britain.

The Ashantis.

Cause:

The Ashantis, a very fierce and warlike tribe on the Gold Coast of

Africa had repeatedly caused trouble owing to their treatment of the

Fantis, a tribe on the coast under British protection. In 1824 they

defeated a British force and carried off to Kumasi the skull of the

Governor, Sir Charles M’Carthy, which was used as a royal drinking cup.

They were afterwards defeated in 1826. In 1863 an expedition against

them had to be abandoned owing to the ravages done by sickness among

the troops. In 1867 a warlike king, Kofi Karikari succeeded as ruler

and proceeded to make hostile preparations against the Fantis.

Occasion:

In 1872 some Dutch possessions on the Gold Coast were transferred to

Great Britain. The King of Ashanti claimed a tribute formerly allowed

to him by the Dutch and refused to evacuate the territory ceded

to Britain. He also held four Europeans in captivity. The British

Government determined to take up the matter seriously, and when in

January 1873 an Ashanti force invaded the British Protectorate an

expedition under Sir Garnet Wolseley was immediately despatched.

Course of the War:

Owing to difficulties of climate it was necessary that the whole

campaign should be rapidly carried out. The Ashantis were defeated at

all points. Kumasi was reached and King Kofi surrendered. The European

troops suffered severely from fever but the objects were successfully

accomplished. Wolseley sailed from England on September 12, 1873, and

returned to Portsmouth on March 21, 1874.

Political Result:

The King renounced his claim to supremacy over any part of the former

Dutch protectorate, paid an indemnity in gold, and agreed to prohibit

human sacrifices. Further trouble arose, however, after the death of

the King, his successors disregarding the treaty. In 1895 an expedition

was sent out under Colonel Sir F. Scott. Kumasi was occupied and King

Prempeh deported. Still the Ashanti tribes refused to submit, and

continued in rebellion. The Governor of the Gold Coast and a small

force were surrounded in Kumasi. He managed to escape and Kumasi was

finally relieved by an expedition under Colonel Wilcocks who gradually

suppressed the rebellion. By an Order in Council of September 26, 1901,

Ashanti was formally annexed to the British dominions and given a

separate administration under the control of the Governor of the Gold

Coast.

Remarks:

Imperial responsibilities entail the protection of friendly tribes

against hostile attack in the outlying parts of the Empire. Punitive

expeditions become necessary and annexation is found to be the best

method of securing law and order.

RUSSO-TURKISH WAR

1877–1878

Belligerents:

Russia.

Turkey.

Cause:

The persecution and oppression of Christians in the Ottoman Empire

led to a revolt in Herzegovina in 1875. Andrassy, on behalf of

Austria, presented a Note to the Turkish Government demanding reforms,

and this was followed by the Berlin Memorandum, signed by Germany,

France, Austria, Russia, and Italy. Great Britain alone stood out. The

Bulgarian massacres in June 1876 caused a great sensation in England,

and were followed by a declaration of war by Servia and Montenegro

against Turkey. Great Britain, always mistrusting Russian designs,

called a Conference. The demands of the Conference were rejected by

Turkey in January 1877. The Sultan protested against the encroachment

of the Powers on his inviolable rights.

Occasion:

The London Protocol of March 1877, signed by Great Britain and Russia

and agreed to by the other Powers, called for reforms and expressed the

intention of the Powers to safeguard the Christian population. This was

also rejected by the Turks, and Russia declared war on April 24, 1877.

Course of the War:

The Russian army crossed the Danube. Plevna fell in December 1877.

The Russians entered Adrianople, January 1878. The advance of the

Russian army towards Gallipoli was followed by the dispatch of the

British fleet to Constantinople and brought Russia and Great Britain

within a hair’s-breadth of war. This, however, was avoided and peace

negotiations began.

Political Result:

_Treaty of San Stefano_, March 3, 1878. The independence of Servia,

Montenegro, and Roumania was recognized. Bulgaria was made an

autonomous principality with frontiers including the greater part of

European Turkey; the Dobrudja and certain districts in Asia Minor were

ceded to Russia.

Great Britain objected strongly to this treaty, and proposed a Congress

at Berlin. While the chances of the Congress hung in the balance, Great

Britain made warlike preparations, but the Congress was finally agreed

to.

_Treaty of Berlin_, July 13, 1878. Bulgaria’s frontier was confined to

the country north of the Balkans. Bosnia and Herzegovina were handed

over to Austria: the territory given to Serbia and Montenegro was

further restricted: Thessaly and part of Epirus were ceded to Greece.

By a secret convention Great Britain engaged to protect Turkey against

further aggression of Russia in Asia. In return the Porte assigned

Cyprus to be occupied and administered by England.

Lord Beaconsfield was the British Plenipotentiary at the Peace Congress

and returned declaring he had secured “peace with honour.”

Remarks:

This was a patched-up peace. It settled none of the problems in the

Balkans, which continued to be the danger zone in Europe for the rest

of the century.

THE SECOND AFGHAN WAR

1878–1881

Belligerents:

Great Britain and Indian Troops.

Afghanistan.

Cause:

In 1868 the expanding power of Russia in Asia resulted in Bokhara

becoming a Russian dependency. In 1873 Russia conquered Khiva. Shere

Ali, now ruler of Afghanistan, became alarmed, but failing to come

to an understanding with the British Government, he began to make

overtures to Russia. In 1877 an offer of alliance was made by the

Viceroy of India, but Shere Ali refused to admit a British Agent into

Afghanistan.

Occasion:

In 1878 the Russian Government sent an envoy to Kabul to make a treaty

with the Amir. A British army was also sent, but was turned back on the

frontier, and hostilities were proclaimed by the Viceroy.

Course of the War:

Two British forces marched into the interior of Afghanistan, and

occupied important positions. Shere Ali fled from his capital, and

died in February 1879. By the _Treaty of Gandamuk_, May 1879, Yakub

Khan was recognized as Amir, and he agreed that a British envoy should

reside at his Court. In September 1879, the envoy, his staff, and

his escort were massacred. A fresh expedition was sent under Sir F.

Roberts, who entered Kabul. In 1880, Abdur Rahman, nephew of Shere Ali,

returned from exile in Russia and established himself in the northern

provinces. The British Government came to an agreement with him, and he

was recognized as Amir. In July 1880 Ayub Khan, another son of Shere

Ali, defeated a British force at Maiwand. Roberts reached Kandahar

from Kabul by a rapid march, and defeated Ayub Khan on September 1,

1880. Again, in July 1881, Ayub Khan returned and took possession of

Kandahar, but was finally routed by Abdur Rahman in September.

Political Result:

The frontiers of Afghanistan were delimited in agreement with Russia.

Abdur Rahman’s rulership over Afghanistan was established. He extended

and consolidated his dominion over the whole country, and was

peacefully succeeded by his son Habibullah in 1901.

Remarks:

By the Anglo-Russia Convention of 1907, Great Britain engaged not to

alter the political status of Afghanistan, and Russia recognized it as

outside her sphere of influence.

THE ZULU WAR

1879

Belligerents:

Wars & Treaties, 1815 to 1914 · 第 2 / 5 段