CHAPTER XVIII

THE ALBANIAN FIASCO

The world has not known just what to do with the mountainous country

which comes out in a bend on the upper western side of the Balkan

Peninsula directly opposite the heel of Italy. It caused trouble to

the Romans from the very moment that they became an extra-Italian

power. Inherited from them by the Byzantines, fought for with the

varying fortunes by the Frankish princes, the Venetians, and the Turks,

Albania has remained a country which cannot be said to have ever been

wholly subjected. Nor can it be said to have ever had a national

entity. Its present mediæval condition is due to the fact that, owing

to its high mountains and its being on the road to nowhere, it has not,

since the Roman days at least, undergone the influences of a

contemporary civilization.

Venice recognized the importance of Albania during the days of her

commercial prosperity. For the Albanian coast, with its two splendid

harbours, of Valona and Durazzo, effectively guards the entrance of the

Adriatic into the Mediterranean Sea.

But Albania did not demand attention a hundred years ago when the last

map of Europe was being {352} made by the Congress of Vienna. The

reason for this is simple. Italy was not a political whole. The head

of the Adriatic was entirely in the hands of Austria. There was no

thought at that time of our modern navies, and of the importance of

keeping open the Straits of Otranto. It was the Dalmatian coast, north

of Albania, which Austria considered essential to her commercial

supremacy. Then, too, Greece had not yet received her freedom, and the

Servians had not risen in rebellion against the Ottoman Empire. There

were no Slavic, Hellenic, and Italian questions to disturb Austria in

her peaceful possession of the Adriatic Sea.

It was not until the union of Italy had been accomplished, and the

south Slavic nationalities had formed themselves into political units,

that Albania became a "question" in the chancelleries of Europe.

Austria-Hungary determined that Italy should not get a foothold in

Albania. Italy had the same determination in regard to

Austria-Hungary. Since the last Russo-Turkish War, Austria-Hungary and

Italy have had the united determination to keep the Slavs from reaching

the Adriatic. For the past generation, feeling certain that the end of

the Ottoman Empire was at hand, Austria and Italy through their

missionaries, their schools, and their consular and commercial agents,

have struggled hard against each other to secure the ascendancy in

Albania. Their intrigues have not ceased up to this day.

When Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the Young Turk

oppression of the Albanians aroused the first expression of what might

possibly {353} be called national feeling since the time of Skander

bey's resistance to the Ottoman conquest, the rival Powers, instead of

following in the line of Russia and Great Britain in Persia, and

establishing spheres of interest, agreed to support the Albanian

national movement as the best possible check upon Servian and Greek

national aspirations. This was the status of Albania in her

relationship to the Adriatic Powers, when the war of the Balkan States

against Turkey broke out. The accord between Austria and Italy had

stood the strain of Italy's war with Turkey. Largely owing to their

fear of Russia and to the pressure of Germany, it stood the strain of

the Balkan War. But both Italy and Austria let it be known to the

other Powers that if the Turkish Empire in Europe disappeared, there

must be an independent Albania.

This dictum was accepted in principle by the other four Powers, who saw

in it the only possible chance of preventing the outbreak of a conflict

between Austria and Russia which would be bound to involve all Europe

in war. No nation wanted to fight over the question of Albania.

Russia could not hope to have support from Great Britain and France to

impose upon the Triple Alliance her desire for a Slavic outlet to the

Adriatic. For neither France nor Great Britain was anxious for the

Russian to get to the Mediterranean. The accord between the Powers was

shown in the warning given to Greece and Servia that the solution of

the Albanian question must be reserved for the Powers when a treaty of

peace was signed with Turkey. The accord weathered {354} the severe

test put upon it by the bold defiance of the Montenegrin occupation of

Scutari.

We have spoken elsewhere of the policy of the Young Turks towards

Albania. This most useful and loyal corner of the Sultan's dominions

was turned into a country of perennial revolutions, which started soon

after the inauguration of the constitutional _régime_. In the winter

of 1911-1912, when the group of Albanian deputies in the Ottoman

Parliament saw their demands for reforms rejected by the Cabinet, and

even the right of discussion of their complaints refused on the floor

of Parliament, the Albanians north and south, Catholic and Moslem,

united in a resistance to the Turkish authorities that extended to

Uskub and Monastir. After the spring elections of 1912, the resistance

became a formidable revolt. For the Young Turks had rashly manoeuvred

the balloting with more than Tammany skill. The Albanians were left

without representatives in Parliament! Former deputies, such as Ismail

Kemal bey, Hassan bey, and chiefs such as Isa Boletinatz, Idris Sefer,

and Ali Riza joined in a determination to demand autonomy by force of

arms.

When, in July, the Cabinet decided to move an army against the

Albanians, there were wholesale desertions from the garrison of

Monastir, and of Albanian officers from all parts of European Turkey.

Mahmoud Shevket pasha was compelled to resign the Ministry of War, and

was followed by Saïd pasha and the whole Cabinet. The Albanians

demanded as a _sine qua non_ the dissolution of Parliament. The {355}

Mukhtar Cabinet agreed to the dissolution, and accepted almost all the

demands of the rebels in a conference at Pristina.

For the tables had now been turned. Instead of a Turkish invasion of

Albania for "pacification," as in previous summers, it was a question

now of an Albanian invasion of Turkey. In spite of the conciliatory

spirit of the new Cabinet, the agitation persisted. It was rumoured

that the Malissores and the Mirdites were planning a campaign against

Scutari and Durazzo. I was in Uskub in the early part of September.

Isa Boletinatz and his band were practically in possession of the city.

A truce for Ramazan, the Moslem fast month, had been arranged between

Turks and Albanians. But the Albanians said they would not lay down

their arms until a new and honestly constitutional election was held.

Immediately after Ramazan came the Balkan War. Albania found herself

separated from Turkey, and in a position to have more than autonomy

without having to deal further with the Turks.

During the Balkan War, the attitude of the Albanians was a tremendous

disappointment to the Turks. One marvels that loyalty to the Empire

could have been expected, even from the Moslem element, in Albania.

And yet the Turks did expect that a Pan-Islamic feeling would draw the

Albanian _beys_ to fight for the Sultan, just as they had expected a

similar phenomenon on the part of the rebellious Arabs of the Arabic

peninsula during the war with Italy.

{356}

From the very beginning the Albanians adopted an attitude of

opportunism. They did not lift a hand directly to help the Turks. Had

they so desired, they might have made impossible the investment of

Janina by the Greeks. But nowhere, save in Scutari, did the Albanians

make a stubborn stand against the military operations of the Balkan

allies. Almost from the beginning, they had understood that the Powers

would not allow the partition of Albania. They knew that the retention

of Janina was hopeless after the successes of the allies during

October. But they received encouragement from both Austria-Hungary and

Italy to fight for Scutari.

The heroic defence of Scutari, which lasted longer than that of any of

the other fortified towns in the Balkan Peninsula, cannot be regarded

as a feat of the Turkish army. During the siege, the general

commanding Scutari had been assassinated by order of Essad pasha, who

was his second in command. Essad then assumed charge of the defence as

purely Albanian in character. He refused to accept the armistice, and

continued the struggle throughout the debates in London. Scutari is at

the south end of a lake which is shared between Albania and Montenegro.

Commanding the city is a steep barren hill called Tarabosh. With their

heavy artillery on this hill, the Albanians were able to prevent

indefinitely the capture of their city. Servians and Montenegrins

found themselves confronted with the task of taking Tarabosh by

assault, if they hoped to occupy Scutari. This was a feat beyond the

strength of a Balkan army. On the {357} steep slopes of this hill were

placed miles of barbed wire. The assailants were mowed down each time

they tried to reach the batteries at the top. As Tarabosh commanded

the four corners of the horizon, its cannon could prevent an assault or

bombardment of the city from the plain. The allies were unable to

silence the batteries on the crest of this hill.

During the winter, the principal question before the concert of

European Powers was that of Scutari. Austria-Hungary was so determined

that Scutari should not fall into the hands of the Montenegrins and

Servians that she mobilized several army corps in Bosnia-Herzegovina

and on the Russian frontier of Galicia, at Christmas time, 1912. The

New Year brought with it ominous forebodings for the peace of Europe.

Diplomacy worked busily to bring about an accord between the Powers,

and pressure upon the besiegers of Scutari. In the middle of March, it

was unanimously agreed that Scutari should remain to Albania, and that

Servia should receive Prizrend, Ipek, Dibra, and Diakova as

compensation for not reaching the Adriatic, and the assurance of an

economic outlet for a railroad at some Albanian port. The European

concert then decided to demand at Belgrade and Cettinje the lifting of

the siege of Scutari.

Servia, yielding to the warning of Russia that nothing further could be

done for her, consented to withdraw her troops from before Scutari, and

to abandon the points in Albanian territory which had been allotted by

the Powers to the independent Albanian State which they intended to

create. {358} Servia had another reason for doing this. Seeing the

hopelessness of territorial aggrandizement in Albania, she decided to

denounce her treaty of partition, concluded before the war, with

Bulgaria. To realize this act of faithlessness and treachery, she had

need of the sympathetic support of the Powers in the quarrel which was

bound to ensue. We see here how the blocking of Servia's outlet to the

Adriatic led inevitably to a war between the Balkan Allies.

But with Montenegro the situation was entirely different. She had

sacrificed one-fifth of her army in the attacks upon Tarabosh, and

Scutari seemed to her the only thing that she was to get out of the war

with Turkey. Perched up in her mountains, there was little harm that

the Powers could do to her. Just as King Nicholas had precipitated the

Balkan War against the advice of the Powers the previous October, he

decided on April 1st to refuse to obey the command of the Powers to

lift the siege of Scutari. From what I have gathered myself from

conversations in the Montenegrin capital two months later, I feel that

the King of Montenegro can hardly be condemned for what the newspapers

of Europe called his "audacious folly" in refusing to give a favourable

response to the joint note presented to him by the European Ministers

at Cettinje. The Montenegrins are illiterate mountaineers, who know

nothing whatever about considerations of international diplomacy. If

their King had listened to words written on a piece of paper, and had

ordered the Montenegrin troops to withdraw from {359} before Scutari,

he would probably have lost his throne.

So the Powers were compelled to make a show of force. Little

Montenegro, with its one port, and its total population not equal to a

single _arrondissement_ of the city of Paris, received the signal

honour of an international blockade. On April 7th, an international

fleet, under the command of the British Admiral Burney, blockaded the

coast from Antivari to Durazzo. While all Europe was showing its

displeasure in the Adriatic, the Montenegrins kept on, although

deserted by the Servians, sitting in a circle around Scutari, only

twenty-five miles inland from the blockading fleet. On April 23d,

after the Balkan War was all finished, Europe was electrified by the

news that the Albanians had surrendered Scutari to Montenegro. The

worst was to be feared, for Austria announced her determination to send

her troops across the border from Bosnia into Montenegro. Such an

action would certainly have brought on a great European war. For

neither at Rome nor at Petrograd could Austrian intervention have been

tolerated.

No Power in Europe was at that moment ready for war. Largely through

pressure brought to bear at Cettinje by his son-in-law, the King of

Italy, King Nicholas decided on May 5th to deliver Scutari to the

Powers. The Montenegrins withdrew, and ten days later Scutari was

occupied by detachments of marines from the international squadron.

The blockade was lifted. The peace of Europe was saved.

{360}

The Treaty of London, signed on May 30, 1913, put Albania into the

hands of the Powers. The northern and eastern frontiers had been

arranged by the promise made to Servia in return for her withdrawal

from the siege of Scutari. But the southern frontier was still an open

question. Here Italy was as much interested as was Austria in the

north. With Corfu in the possession of Greece, Italy would not agree

that the coast of the mainland opposite should also be Hellenic. The

Greeks, on the contrary, declared that the littoral and _hinterland_,

up beyond Santi Quaranta, was part of ancient Epirus, and inhabited

principally by Greeks. It should therefore revert logically to greater

Greece. Athens lifted again the old cry, "Where there are Hellenes,

there is Hellas." The Greeks were occupying Santi Quaranta. They

claimed as far north as Argyrokastron. But they consented to withdraw

from the Adriatic, north of and opposite Corfu, if interior points

equally far to the north were left to them. An international

commission was formed to make a southern boundary for Albania. Its

task has is still open.

What was to be done with this new state, foster child of all Europe,

with indefinite boundaries, with guardians each jealous of the other,

and neighbours waiting only for a favourable moment to throw themselves

upon her and extinguish her life?

I visited Albania in July, 1913, during the second Balkan War. At

Valona, in the south, I found a provisional government,

self-constituted during the {361} previous winter, whose authority was

problematical outside of Valona itself. At the head of the government

was Ismail Kemal, whom I had known as the champion of Albanian autonomy

in the Ottoman Parliament at Constantinople. He talked passionately of

Albania, the new State in Europe, with its _united_ population and its

_national_ aspirations. He was eager to have the claims of Albania to

a generous southern frontier presented at London. He assured me that I

could write with perfect confidence in glowing terms concerning the

future of Albania, that a spirit of harmony reigned throughout the

country, and that the Albanians of all creeds, freed from Turkish

oppression, were looking eagerly to their new life as an independent

nation. When I expressed misgivings as to the rôle of Essad pasha, the

provisional president asserted that the former commander of Scutari was

wholly in accord with him, and cited as proof the fact that he had that

very day received from Essad pasha his acceptance of the portfolio of

Minister of the Interior.

But that indefinable feeling of misgiving, which one always has over

the enthusiasm of Orientals, caused me to withhold judgment as to the

liability of Albania until I had seen how things were going in other

portions of the new kingdom.

At Durazzo, the northern port of Albania, the friends of Essad pasha

were in control of the government. Things were still being done _à la

turque_, and there was a feeling of great uncertainty concerning the

future. Few had any faith whatever in the provisional government at

Valona, and it was declared {362} that the influence of Essad pasha

would decide the attitude of the Albanians in Durazzo, Tirana, and

Elbassan. Essad was chief of the Toptanis, the most influential family

in the neighbourhood of Durazzo. He had "made his career" in the

_gendarmerie_, and had risen rapidly through the approval and

admiration of Abdul Hamid. This is an indication of his character. He

was credited with the ambition of ruling Albania. To withdraw his

forces and his munitions of war intact, so that he could press these

claims, is the only explanation of his "deal" with King Nicholas of

Montenegro to surrender Scutari. Essad had sacrificed the pride and

honour of Albania to his personal ambition.

From Durazzo, I went to San Giovanni di Medua, which was occupied by

the Montenegrins, just as I had found Santi Quaranta in the south

occupied by the Greeks. Going inland from this port (one must use his

imagination in calling San Giovanni di Medua a port) by way of Alessio,

I reached Scutari, from whose citadel flew the flags of the Powers. In

every quarter of this typically and hopelessly Turkish town, one ran

across sailors from various nations. Each Power had its quarter, and

had named the streets with some curious results. The Via Garibaldi ran

into the Platz Radetzky. On the Catholic cathedral was a sign

informing you that you were in the Rue Ernest Renan.

This accidental naming of streets was a prophecy of the hopelessness of

trying to reconcile the conflicting aims and ideals of the Powers whose

bands were playing side by side in the public garden. In {363} the

dining-room of the hotel, when I saw Austrians, Italians, Germans,

British, and French officers eating together at the long tables,

instead of rejoicing at this seeming spirit of European harmony, I had

the presentiment of the inevitable result of the struggle between Slav

and Teuton, to prevent which these men were there. Just a year later,

I stood in front of the Gare du Montparnasse in Paris reading the order

for General Mobilization. There came back to me as in a dream the

public garden at Scutari, and the mingled strains of national anthems,

with officers standing rigidly in salute beside their half-filled

glasses.

In the palatial home of a British nobleman who had loved the Albanians

and had lived long in Scutari, Admiral Burney established his

headquarters. I talked with him there one afternoon concerning the

present and the future of Albania, and the relationship of the problem

which he had before him with the peace of Europe. Never have I found a

man more intelligently apprehensive of the possible outcome of the

drama in which he was playing a part, and at the same time more

determinedly hopeful to use all his ability and power to save the peace

of Europe by welding together the Albanians into a nation worthy of the

independence that has been given to them by the European concert. Such

men as Admiral Burney are more than the glory of a nation: they are the

making of a nation. The greatness of Britain is due to the men who

serve her. High ideals, self-sacrifice, ability, and energy are the

corner-stones of the British overseas Empire.

{364}

There was little, however, that Admiral Burney, or anyone in fact,

could do for Albania. No nation can exist in modern times, when

national life is in the will of the people rather than in the unifying

qualities of a ruler, if there are no common ideals and the

determination to attain them. Albania is without a national spirit and

a national past. It is, therefore, no unit, capable of being welded

into a state. The creation by the Ambassadors of the Powers in London

may have been thought by them to be a necessity. But it was really a

makeshift. If the Albanians had done their part, and had shown the

possibility of union, the makeshift might have developed into a new

European state. As things have turned out, it has stayed what it was

in the beginning,--a fiasco.

Among the many candidates put forward for the new throne, Prince

William of Wied was finally decided upon. He was a Protestant, and

could occupy a position of neutrality among his Moslem, Orthodox, and

Catholic subjects. He was a German, and could not be suspected of

Slavic sympathies. He was a relative of the King of Rumania, and could

expect powerful support in the councils of the Balkan Powers.

It would be wearisome to go into the story of Prince William's short

and unhappy reign. At Durazzo, which was chosen for the capital, he

quickly showed himself incapable of the rôle which a genius among

rulers might have failed to play successfully. Lost in a maze of

bewildering intrigues, foreign and domestic, the ruler of Albania saw

his prestige, and {365} then his dignity, disappear. He never had any

real authority. He had been forced upon the Albanians. They did not

want him. The Powers who had placed him upon the throne did not

support him. In the spring, the usual April heading, "Albania in

Arms," appeared once more in the newspapers of the world. Up to the

outbreak of the European war, when Albania was "lost in the shuffle,"

almost daily telegrams detailed the march of the insurgents upon

Durazzo, the useless and fatal heroism of the Dutch officers of the

_gendarmerie_, the incursions of the Epirote bands in the south, and

the embarrassing position of the international forces still occupying

Scutari. What the Albanians really wanted, none could guess, much less

they themselves!

The European war, in August, 1914, enabled the Powers to withdraw

gracefully from the Albanian fiasco. Their contingents hurriedly

abandoned Scutari, and sailed for home. The French did not have time

to do this, so they went to Montenegro. Since the catastrophe, to

prevent which they had created Albania, had fallen upon Europe, what

further need was there for the Powers to bother about the fortunes of

Prince William and his subjects? Italy alone was left with hands free,

and her interests were not at stake, so long as Greece kept out of the

fray. For Prince William of Wied, Italy felt no obligation whatever.

Without support and without money, there was nothing left to Prince

William but to get out. He did not have the good sense to make his

withdrawal from Albania a dignified proceeding. The palace {366} was

left under seals. The Prince issued a proclamation which would lead

the Albanians to believe that it was his intention to return. It may

be that he thought the triumph of the German and Austrian armies in the

European war would mean his re-establishment to Durazzo. But after he

was once again safely home at Neu-Wied, he did what he ought to have

done many months before. A high-sounding manifesto announced his

abdication, and wished the Albanians Godspeed in the future. After

this formality had been accomplished, the former Mpret of Albania

rejoined his regiment in the German army, and went out to fight against

the French.

With Prince William of Wied and the international corps of occupation

gone, the Albanians were left to themselves. At Durazzo, a body of

notables, calling themselves the Senate, adopted resolutions restoring

the Ottoman flag and the suzerainty of the Sultan, invited Prince

Burhaneddin effendi, a son of Abdul Hamid, to become their ruler, and

solemnly decreed that hereafter the Turkish language should be restored

to its former position as the official language of the country.

But Essad pasha thought otherwise. The psychological moment, for which

he had been waiting ever since his surrender of Scutari to the

Montenegrins, had come. In the first week of October, he hurried to

Durazzo with his followers, had himself elected head of a new

provisional government by the Albanian Senate, and announced openly

that his policy would be to look to Italy instead of to Austria for

support. After rendering homage to the Sultan as Khalif, {367} asking

the people to celebrate the happy spirit of harmony which now reigned

throughout Albania, and prophesying a new era of peace and prosperity

for Europe's latest-born independent state, the former _gendarme_ of

Abdul Hamid entered the palace, broke the seals of the international

commission, and went to sleep in the bed of Prince William of Wied.

One wonders whether the new ruler of Albania will have more restful

slumbers than his predecessor. In spite of all protests, Greece is

still secretly encouraging the Epirotes in their endeavour to push

northward the frontier of the Hellenic kingdom. Italy has two army

corps at Brindisi waiting for a favourable moment to occupy Valona.

The Montenegrins and Servians are planning once more to reach the

Adriatic through the valleys of the Boyana and Drin, after they have

driven the Austro-Hungarian armies from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Only

an Austrian triumph could now save Albania from her outside enemies.

But could anything save her from her inside enemies? When I read of

Essad Pasha in Durazzo, self-chosen Moses of his people, there comes

back to me a conversation with the leading Moslem chieftain of Scutari,

whose guest I had the privilege of being, in his home in the summer of

1913. When I mentioned Essad pasha, he rose to his feet before the

fire, waved his arms, and cried out: "When I see Essad, I shall shoot

him like a dog!"

{368}

The New Map of Europe (1911-1914) The Story of the Recent European Diplomatic Crises and Wars and of Europe's Present Catastrophe · 第 18 / 21 章