EPODE

_Xer._ Raise a re-echoing cry.

_Chor._ Ah woe! ah woe!

_Xer._ Go to thy home with wailing loud and long.

_Chor._ O land of Persia, full of lamentations!

_Xer._ Through the town raise your cries.

_Chor._ We raise them, yea, we raise. 1050

_Xer._ Wail, wail, ye men that walked so daintily.

_Chor._ O land of Persia, full of lamentations!

Woe; woe!

_Xer._ Alas for those who in the triremes perished!

_Chor._ With broken cries of woe will I escort thee.

[_Exeunt in procession, wailing, and

rending their robes._

-----

Footnote 3:

“The Faithful,” or “trusty,” seems to have been a special title of

honour given to the veteran councillors of the king (Xenoph. _Anab._

i. 15), just as that of the “Immortals” was chosen for his body-guard

(Herod, vii. 83).

Footnote 4:

Susa was pre-eminently the treasury of the Persian kings (Herod, v.

49; Strabo, xv. p. 731), their favourite residence in spring, as

Ecbatana in Media was in summer and Babylon in winter.

Footnote 5:

Kissia was properly the name of the district in which Susa stood; but

here, and in v. 123, it is treated as if it belonged to a separate

city. Throughout the play there is, indeed, a lavish use of Persian

barbaric names of persons and places, without a very minute regard to

historical accuracy.

Footnote 6:

Here, as in Herodotos and Greek writers generally, the title, “the

King,” or “the great King,” was enough. It could be understood only of

the Persian. The latter name had been borne by the kings of Assyria (2

Kings xviii. 28). A little later it passed into the fuller, more

boastful form of “The King of kings.”

Footnote 7:

The inhabitants of the Delta of the Nile, especially those of the

marshy districts near the Heracleotic mouth, were famed as supplying

the best and bravest soldiers of any part of Egypt.—Comp. Thucyd. i.

110.

Footnote 8:

The epithet was applied probably by Æschylos to the Lydians properly

so called, the barbaric race with whom the Hellenes had little or

nothing in common. They, in dress, diet, mode of life, their distaste

for the contests of the arena, seemed to the Greeks the very type of

effeminacy. The Ionian Greeks, however, were brought under the same

influence, and gradually acquired the same character. The suppression

of the name of the Ionians in the list of the Persian forces may be

noticed as characteristic. The Athenian poet would not bring before an

Athenian audience the shame of their Asiatic kinsmen.

Footnote 9:

Tmôlos, sacred as being the mythical birth-place of Dionysos.

Footnote 10:

“Spear-anvils,” _sc._, meeting the spear of their foes as the anvils

would meet it, turning its point, themselves steadfast and immovable.

Footnote 11:

So Herodotos (vii. 74) in his account of the army of Xerxes describes

the Mysians as using for their weapons those darts or “javelins” made

by hardening the ends in the fire.

Footnote 12:

Helle the daughter of Athamas, from whom the Hellespont took its name.

For the description of the pontoons formed by boats, which were moored

together with cables and finally covered with faggots, comp. Herod,

vii. 36.

Footnote 13:

“Gold-born,” _sc._, descended from Perseus, the child of Danaë.

Footnote 14:

Syrian, either in the vague sense in which it became almost synonymous

with Assyrian, or else showing that Syria, properly so called,

retained the fame for chariots which it had had at a period as early

as the time of the Hebrew Judges (Judg. v. 3). Herodotos (vii. 140)

gives an Oracle of Delphi in which the same epithet appears.

Footnote 15:

The description, though put into the mouth of Persians, is meant to

flatter Hellenic pride. The Persians and their army were for the most

part light-armed troops only, barbarians equipped with javelins or

bows. In the sculptures of Persepolis, as in those of Nineveh and

Khorsabad, this mode of warfare is throughout the most conspicuous.

They, the Hellenes, were the _hoplites_, warriors of the spear and the

shield, the cuirass and the greaves.

Footnote 16:

A touch of Athenian exultation in their life as seamen. To them the

sea was almost a home. They were familiar with it from childhood. To

the Persians it was new and untried. They had a new lesson to learn,

late in the history of the nation, late in the lives of individual

soldiers.

Footnote 17:

The bridge of boats, with the embankment raised upon it, is thought of

as a new headland putting out from the one shore and reaching to the

other.

Footnote 18:

Stress is laid by the Hellenic poet, as in the _Agamemnon_ (v. 895),

and in v. 707 of this play, on the tendency of the East to give to its

kings the names and the signs of homage which were due only to the

Gods. The Hellenes might deify a dead hero, but not a living

sovereign. On different grounds the Jews shrank, as in the stories of

Nebuchadnezzar and Dareios (Dan. iii. 6), from all such acts.

Footnote 19:

In the Greek, as in the translation, there is a change of metre,

intended apparently to represent the transition from the tone of eager

excitement to the ordinary level of discourse.

Footnote 20:

With reference either to the _mythos_ that Asia and Europa were both

daughters of Okeanos, or to the historical fact that the Asiatic

Ionians and the Dorians of Europe were both of the same Hellenic

stock. The contrast between the long flowing robes of the Asiatic

women, and the short, scanty kilt-like dress of those of Sparta must

be borne in mind if we would see the picture in its completeness.

Footnote 21:

Athenian pride is flattered with the thought that they had resisted

while the Ionian Greeks had submitted all too willingly to the yoke of

the Barbarian.

Footnote 22:

Lustrations of this kind, besides their general significance in

cleansing from defilement, had a special force as charms to turn aside

dangers threatened by foreboding dreams. Comp. Aristoph. _Frogs_, v.

1264; Persius, _Sat._ ii. 16.

Footnote 23:

The political bearing of the passage as contrasting this

characteristic of the despotism of Persia with the strict account to

which all Athenian generals were subject, is, of course, unmistakable.

Footnote 24:

The question, which seems to have rankled in the minds of the

Athenians, is recorded as an historical fact, and put into the mouth

of Dareios by Herodotos (v. 101). He had asked it on hearing that

Sardis had been attacked and burnt by them.

Footnote 25:

The words point to the silver mines of Laureion, which had been worked

under Peisistratos, and of which this is the first mention in Greek

literature.

Footnote 26:

Once more the contrast between the Greek _hoplite_ and the light-armed

archers of the invaders is dwelt upon. The next answer of the Chorus

dwells upon the deeper contrast, then prominent in the minds of all

Athenians, between their democratic freedom and the despotism of

Persia. Comp. Herod. v. 78.

Footnote 27:

The system of postal communications by means of couriers which Dareios

had organised had made their speed in running proverbial (Herod. vii.

97).

Footnote 28:

With the characteristic contempt of a Greek for other races, Æschylos

makes the Persians speak of themselves throughout as 'barbarians,'

'barbaric.'

Footnote 29:

Perhaps— “On planks that floated onward,”

or— “On land and sea far spreading.”

Footnote 30:

Possibly Salamis itself, as famed for the doves which were reared

there as sacred to Aphrodite, but possibly also one of the smaller

islands in the Saronic gulf, which the epithet would be enough to

designate for an Athenian audience. The “coasts of the Sileni” in v.

305 are identified by scholiasts with Salamis.

Footnote 31:

Perhaps—“And ten of these selected as reserve.”

Footnote 32:

As regards the number of the Persian ships, 1000 of average, and 207

of special swiftness. Æschylos agrees with Herodotos, who gives the

total of 1207. The latter, however, reckons the Greek ships not at

310, but 378 (vii. 89, viii. 48).

Footnote 33:

The fact that Athens had actually been taken, and its chief buildings

plundered and laid waste, was, of course, not a pleasant one for the

poet to dwell on. It could hardly, however, be entirely passed over,

and this is the one allusion to it. In the truest sense it was still

“unsacked:” it had not lost its most effective defence, its most

precious treasure.

Footnote 34:

As the story is told by Herodotos (vii. 75), this was Sikinnos, the

slave of Themistocles, and the stratagem was the device of that

commander to save the Greeks from the disgrace and ruin of a _sauve

qui peut_ flight in all directions.

Footnote 35:

The Greeks never beheaded their criminals, and the punishment is

mentioned as being specially characteristic of the barbaric Persians.

Footnote 36:

The Æginetans and Megarians, according to the account preserved by

Diodoros (xi. 18), or the Lacedæmonians, according to Herodotos (viii.

65).

Footnote 37:

This may be meant to refer to the achievements of Ameinias of Pallene,

who appears in the traditional life of Œschylos as his youngest

brother.

Footnote 38:

_Sc._, in Herod. viii. 60, the strait between Salamis and the

mainland.

Footnote 39:

Tunny-fishing has always been prominent in the occupations on the

Mediterranean coasts, and the sailors who formed so large a part of

every Athenian audience would be familiar with the process here

described, of striking or harpooning them. Aristophanes (_Wasps_,

1087) coins (or uses) the word “to tunny” (θυννάζω) to express the

act. Comp. Herod. i. 62.

Footnote 40:

_Sc._, Psyttaleia, lying between Salamis and the mainland. Pausanias

(i. 36-82) describes it in his time as having no artistic shrine or

statue, but full everywhere of roughly carved images of Pan, to whom

the island was sacred. It lay just opposite the entrance to the

Peiræos. The connexion of Pan with Salamis and its adjacent islands

seems implied in Sophocles, _Aias_, 695.

Footnote 41:

The manœuvre was, we learn from Herodotos (viii. 95), the work of

Aristeides, the personal friend of Æschylos, and the statesman with

whose policy he had most sympathy.

Footnote 42:

The lines are noted as probably a spurious addition, by a weaker hand,

to the text, as introducing surplusage, as inconsistent with

Herodotos, and as faulty in their metrical structure.

Footnote 43:

So Herodotos (viii. 115) describes them as driven by hunger to eat

even grass and leaves.

Footnote 44:

No trace of this passage over the frozen Strymon appears in Herodotos,

who leaves the reader to imagine that it was crossed, as before, by a

bridge. It is hardly, indeed, consistent with dramatic probability

that the courier should have remained to watch the whole retreat of

the defeated army; and on this and other grounds, the latter part of

the speech has been rejected by some critics as a later addition.

Footnote 45:

The Ionians, not of the Asiatic Ionia, but of Attica.

Footnote 46:

Kychreia, the archaic name of Salamis.

Footnote 47:

The ritual described is Hellenic rather than Persian, and takes its

place (Soph. _Electr._ 836; Eurip. _Iphig. Taur._ 583; Homer, _Il._

xxiii. 219) as showing what offerings were employed to soothe or call

up the spirits of the dead. Comp. Pliny, _Hist. Nat._ xxx.

Footnote 48:

The description obviously gives the state dress of the Persian kings.

They alone wore the tiara erect. Xen. _Kyrop._ viii. 3, 13.

Footnote 49:

Either that he has felt the measured tread of the mourners round his

tomb, as they went wailing round and round, or that he has heard the

rush of armies, and seen the plain tracked by chariot-wheels, and

comes, not knowing all these things, to learn what it means.

Footnote 50:

The words point to the widespread belief that when the souls of the

dead were permitted to return to the earth, it was with strict

limitations as to the time of their leave of absence.

Footnote 51:

Perhaps—“I dread to speak the truth.”

Footnote 52:

According to Herodotos (vii. 225) two brothers of Xerxes fell at

Thermopylæ.

Footnote 53:

As Herodotos (viii. 117) tells the story, the bridge had been broken

by the tempest before Xerxes reached it.

Footnote 54:

Probably Mardonios and Onomacritos the Athenian soothsayer are

referred to, who, according to Herodotos (vii. 6, viii. 99) were the

chief instigators of the expedition.

Footnote 55:

Astyages, the father-in-law of Kyaxares and grandfather of Kyros. In

this case Æschylos must be supposed to accept Xenophon's statement

that Kyaxares succeeded to Astyages. Possibly, however, the Median may

be Kyaxares I., the father of Astyages, and so the succession here

would harmonise with that of Herodotos. The whole succession must be

looked on as embodying the loose, floating notions of the Athenians as

to the history of their great enemy, rather than as the result of

inquiry.

Footnote 56:

Stress is laid on the violence to which the Asiatic Ionians had

succumbed, and their resistance to which distinguished them from the

Lydians or Phrygians, whose submission had been voluntary.

Footnote 57:

Mardos. Under this name we recognise the Pseudo-Smerdis of Herodotos

(iii. 67), who, by restoring the dominion of the Median Magi, the

caste to which he himself belonged, brought shame upon the Persians.

Footnote 58:

Possibly another form of Intaphernes, who appears in Herodotos (iii.

70) as one of the seven conspirators against the Magian

Pseudo-Smerdis.

Footnote 59:

The force of 300,000 men left in Greece under Mardonios (Herod. viii.

113), afterwards defeated at Platæa.

Footnote 60:

Comp. the speech of Mardonios urging his plan on Xerxes (Herod. viii.

100).

Footnote 61:

This was of course a popular topic with the Athenians, whose own

temples had been outraged. But other sanctuaries also, the temples at

Delphi and Abæ, had shared the same fate, and these sins against the

Gods of Hellas were naturally connected in the thoughts of the Greeks

with the subsequent disasters of the Persians. In Egypt these outrages

had an iconoclastic character. In Athens they were a retaliation for

the destruction of the temple at Sardis (Herod. v. 102).

Footnote 62:

The reference to the prominent part taken by the Peloponnesian forces

in the battle of Platæa is probably due to the political sympathies of

the dramatist.

Footnote 63:

The speech of Atossa is rejected by Paley, on internal grounds, as

spurious.

Footnote 64:

Apparently an allusion to the oracle given to Crœsos, that he, if he

crossed the Halys, should destroy a great kingdom.

Footnote 65:

The name originally given to the Echinades, a group of islands at the

mouth of the Acheloös, was applied generically to all islands lying

near the mouth of all great rivers, and here, probably, includes

Imbros, Thasos, and Samothrakè.

Footnote 66:

The geography is somewhat obscure, but the words seem to refer to the

portion of the islands that are named as opposite (in a southerly

direction) to the promontory of the Troad.

Footnote 67:

Salamis in Kypros had been colonised by Teukros, the son of Aias, and

had received its name in remembrance of the island in the Saronic

Gulf.

Footnote 68:

The Mariandynoi, a Paphlagonian tribe, conspicuous for their orgiastic

worship of Adonis, had become proverbial for the wildness of their

plaintive dirges.

Footnote 69:

The name seems to have been an official title for some

Inspector-General of the Army. Comp. Aristoph. _Acharn._ v. 92.

Footnote 70:

As in the account which Herodotos gives (vii. 60) of the way in which

the army of Xerxes was numbered, _sc._, by enclosing 10,000 men in a

given space, and then filling it again and again till the whole army

had passed through.

Footnote 71:

Æschylos Tragedies and Fragments · 第 88 / 507 题