BARONS OF HUGH LUPUS.

(Vol. iii., pp. 87. 189.)

The inquiry of P., in p. 87., seems to indicate an impression that all the

witnesses to the charter of Hugh Lupus to Chester Abbey were barons of the

Palatinate, but only a few of them were such, the rest being of England

generally.

The original barons of the Palatinate were clearly distinguishable by

possession of privileges confirmed to them by a well-known charter of Earl

Ranulph III.; and all the Norman founders of their baronies will be found,

under Cestrescire, in Domesday, as tenants in capite, from the Earl

Palatine, of lordships within the lyme of his county.

_Bigod de Loges_ (one of the subjects of P.'s inquiry) will not bear this

test, unless he was identical with Bigot, Norman lord of the manors

afterwards comprised in Aldford Fee, which is not known to have been the

case. For this last-named Bigot, whose lands descended through the Alfords

to Arderne, reference may be made to the _History of Cheshire_, I. xxix.,

II. 411.

_William Malbanc_, the other subject of inquiry, who has eluded M. J. T.'s

searches, is easily identified. He was the Norman baron of Nantwich, the

Willelmus Malbedeng of the _Domesday Survey_ (vol. i. p. 265. col. 2.), and

the name is also written thus in the copy of H. Lupus's charter referred

to, which was ratified under inspection by Guncelyn de Badlesmere,

Justiciary of Chester in 8 Edw. I.

The charter, with Badlesmere's attestation prefixed, will be found in

Leycester's _Cheshire Antiquities_, p. 109., and in Ormerod's _Hist. of

Cheshire_, vol. i. p. 12. In the latter work, in vol. iii., the inquirer

will also find an account of William Malbedeng or Malbanc, his estates, his

descendant coheirs, and their several subdivisions, extending from p. 217.

to p. 222., under the proper head of Nantwich or _Wich Malbanc_, a still

existing Palatine barony.

Notes and Queries, Number 75, April 5, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 68 / 98 题