CHAPTER III.

1760-1824.

British intercourse with Ava—Alves’s mission—Symes’s

mission—Canning—King Nun-Sun—Rise of the Burman war—Its origin

in official aggression—Evacuation of Cachar.

We must now return somewhat upon our steps, to observe the changes which

had taken place in European relations with the native kings. We have

to look back to the time of the decease of Alompra. Doubtless, had the

English force in Burmah been adequate to the execution of such a measure,

ample revenge would have been taken, or rather, ample satisfaction would

have been enforced, for the brutal massacre of the English at Negrais:

but their means were not up to the mark. “Perhaps, also,” as Symes

remarks, “they were not ignorant that a discussion of the causes might

only produce useless explanations: a conjecture that is, in some degree,

corroborated by there being no steps taken at any subsequent period when

the British superiority in Asia had crushed all rivalry, to vindicate

the national honour, and chastise the perpetrators of the cruelty.”[252]

Most probably, however, the English government was sensible that the

part their countrymen had acted had been a treacherous one, and that

it would not do to have it thrown in their faces, as it undoubtedly

would have been. In this case the French would have succeeded in their

darling scheme of shaking the importance of the English in the country,

for the accomplishment of which they have never in any way omitted any

opportunity, supporting their plans also by that form of assertion, which

admits of contradiction, but can never be disproved: and a like system of

falsehood had been pursued by the English.

It was, however, necessary to make some appeal in behalf of the

remaining Europeans, and Captain Alves, who had brought the sad news to

Bengal, was the man selected for the negotiation. He was charged with

letters, which, while they show little desire to uphold the dignity

of England, yet manifest a praiseworthy and heartfelt interest in the

fate of the British. They were signed by Mr. Holwell, the governor of

Bengal, and Mr. Pigot, the governor of Madras. The letter of the latter

gentleman, indeed, was of a more independent character, “and intimated

expectation that the murderers of the English settlers should be brought

to punishment; a requisition that was little attended to, and which

the British government of India never manifested any inclination to

enforce.”[253]

Captain Alves sailed from Madras with these letters on the 10th of May,

1760. He did not steer direct for Negrais, but addressed a letter to

Gregory the Armenian, then Ackawoon of Rangoon, whom it was desirable to

conciliate, and after exaggerating his influence at court, he entreated

his good offices in behalf of the captives. With these letters a present

of some value was sent. On the 5th of June, he arrived at Diamond Island,

near Negrais, when he reconnoitred the disposition of the natives.

However, his fears were removed, and he landed. Upon this, Antony came

down, and was received with hypocritical cordiality by Alves, and the

interpreter tried all he could to prevent his being considered guilty. In

a short time he received a letter from Mungai Narrataw, one of the royal

family, inviting him to Rangoon; he thought it politic to go thither, and

arrived on the 5th of August. There seemed to be little objection to the

release of the prisoners, and Mr. Robertson was permitted to accompany

Captain Alves to Bassein. Meanwhile, Gregory the Armenian returned,

bearing a letter from Anaundopra, or Namdogee-Praw. “In the translation,

which Gregory, as interpreter, delivered to Captain Alves, the crafty

Armenian introduced passages favourable to himself, attributing the

obtainment of any attention to his intercession; these interpolations

were fabricated, as the imperial mandate did not even mention the name

of Gregory.”[254] Accordingly, on the 22nd of August, Alves took his

departure from Bassein, and, though much annoyed by the officials, he

arrived at Chagaing, the then capital, on the 22nd of September, without

any important event occurring in the interim.

On the 23rd, Alves had an audience with the king. His majesty seemed

surprised that the English should desire any satisfaction for the

punishment which had been dealt out against the Company’s servants in

consequence of their own ill behaviour. At the same time he regretted

the accident which had involved Mr. Southby in their fate, yet it was

unavoidable; “for,” said the king, “I suppose you have seen that in

this country, in the wet season, there grows so much useless grass and

weeds in the fields, that in dry weather we are forced to burn them to

clear the ground: it sometimes happens that there are salubrious herbs

amongst these noxious weeds and grass, which, as they cannot easily

be distinguished, are indiscriminately consumed with the others; thus

it happened to be the new governor’s lot.”[255] To the other demands,

regarding restitution of property, a decided refusal was returned, except

as regarded the Company’s goods; but the release of the British prisoners

was acceded to. “Having given an order for the release of all English

subjects that were prisoners in his dominions, he desired that two of

the most prudent should remain to take care of the timbers, and reside

at Persaim,[256] where he consented to give the Company a grant of as

much ground as they might have occasion to occupy, under the stipulation

that their chief settlement should be at Persaim, and not at Negrais.

He assigned as a reason, that at Negrais they would be exposed to the

depredations of the French, or any other nation with whom the English

might be at war, without a possibility of his _extending that protection

to them that he wished_: but of which they could always have _the full

benefit_ at Persaim.”[257] But at the same time he stipulated for an

equivalent in arms and other goods, which were _conditionally_ promised

him.

Falsehood and treachery rarely go unrewarded. And be it ever so well

disguised, some hook _will_ tear a hole in the garment and show the

nakedness beneath. Suddenly, the interpreter Gregory was discovered in

his plans, and his punishment was quick, just, and severe; indeed, he

nearly lost his life.

The transactions concluded, Captain Alves at length left Chagaing

for Persaim; and leaving Messrs. Robertson and Helass at that place,

he proceeded to Rangoon, whence he returned by the 14th of November.

Having completed his mission, he then sailed for Bengal, which he

reached before the end of the year. From this time down to 1795, under

the administration of Men-ta-ra-gyee, nothing of importance occurred in

the colony. And here I cannot do better than offer a few remarks of Mr.

Macfarlane, the historian of British India, already referred to:—

“Ava and the Burmese empire either held a direct sovereignty or exercised

control over nearly one-half of the vast regions described in maps as

India beyond the Ganges.... By a series of conquests they had overthrown

all the adjacent nations, and had advanced their frontier to the

shores of the Bay of Bengal, and close to the limits of the Company’s

territories. They proved but troublesome and encroaching neighbours.

During Lord Wellesley’s administration, in 1799, when the mass of the

Anglo-Indian army was engaged in the last war against Tippoo Sultaun, the

Burmese made frequent attacks, and were very troublesome on our then weak

eastern frontier.[258] As exclusive and anti-social as the Chinese, and

quite as proud and insolent in their bearing towards foreign envoys, and

foreigners of all classes, it was difficult to establish any intercourse

with them, or to obtain, by pacific representations, any redress of

grievances. Their government, too, was subject to frequent and sanguinary

revolutions, insurrections, and rebellions; one tyrant being murdered,

and succeeded by another.”[259]

In 1795, Symes was deputed to the arrogant Men-ta-ra-gyee, to remonstrate

against the incursions of the Burmese troops. “In 1795,” says Macfarlane,

“a Burmese army of five thousand men pursued three rebellious chiefs,

or, as they termed them (and as they might be), robbers, right into

the English district of Chittagong. A strong detachment was sent from

Calcutta to oppose these Burmese; but the officer in command had orders

to negotiate—not to fight. After some tedious negotiations, which ought

not to have been allowed to occupy a single hour, the violators of our

frontier condescended to agree to retire; and they retired, accordingly,

into their own country. Nor was this all. These three men, who had taken

refuge in our territories, were subsequently given up to the Burmese, and

two out of the three were put to death with atrocious tortures.”[260]

Little, however, came of the colonel’s embassy, “except,” as our

historian goes on to remark,[261] “a very interesting book of travels.”

In the year 1809, a French ship attacked a small island belonging to

the Burmese, and the Golden Foot, not understanding the difference

between French and English,[262] sent a sort of mission to Calcutta

to expostulate against the proceeding, and to demand satisfaction. As

this seemed to open the door of the jealously-guarded court of Ava to

some diplomatic intercourse, Lord Minto despatched Lieutenant Canning

on an embassy. This officer reached Rangoon; and the king of Ava, from

the midst of his white elephants, decreed that the Englishman should be

allowed to proceed to the capital, in all safety and honour; but the

incursions into the Company’s territory at Chittagong of a predatory

tribe of Burmese, called the Mughs, and other untoward events, broke off

an intercourse which never could have promised any very satisfactory

result. Both our embassies to Ava appear to have been capital mistakes,

for they exhibited to a semi-barbarous and vain-glorious people a number

of Englishmen in a very humiliating condition, and in the attitude of

supplicants.

“Lieutenant Canning returned to Calcutta, and disputes continued to occur

on the frontiers of Chittagong and Tippera. As they were not met by

bayonets, the Burmese grew more and more audacious; and at the time when

Lord Minto gave up his authority in India to the earl of Moira, the King

of the World and the Lord of the White Elephants was threatening to march

with forty thousand soldier-pilgrims, from Ava to Benares.”

We will now return to the history of the Burmese monarchy. At the death

of Men-ta-ra-gyee, his grandson, Nun-Sun, “The Enjoyer of the Palace,”

ascended the throne. His father, the heir-apparent, was the idol of the

people, but an early death had deprived him of the crown to which he was

so justly entitled. Out of policy, Men-ta-ra-gyee, some of whose acts

had contributed to render unpopular, adopted Nun-Sun, his son, to the

exclusion of the rest of the family. The history of this prince is thus

given by Malcom:[263]—

“He was married in early life to a daughter of his uncle, the Mekaru

prince; but one of his inferior wives, daughter of a comparatively humble

officer, early acquired great ascendancy over his mind, and on his coming

to the throne, was publicly crowned by his side. On the same day the

proper queen was sent out of the palace, and now lives in obscurity.

His plan for securing the succession shows that he was aware that even

the late king’s will would not secure him from powerful opposition. The

king’s death was kept secret for some days, and the interval employed

to station a multitude of adherents in different parts of the city,

to prevent any gatherings. On announcing the demise, the ceremony of

burning was forthwith performed in the palace-yard, at which he appeared

as king, with the queen by his side, under the white umbrella, and at

once took upon himself all the functions of royalty. Several suspected

princes were soon after executed, and many others deprived of all their

estates.... Two years after his accession, the king resolved to restore

the seat of government to Ava. To this he was induced, partly from the

great superiority of the latter location; partly from the devastation of

a fire which burnt a great part of Umerapoora, with the principal public

buildings; partly from a desire to create a more splendid palace; and

partly (perhaps, not least) from the ill omen of a vulture lighting on

the royal spire.[264] The greater part of his time, for two years, was

spent at Ava, in temporary buildings, and superintending in person the

erection of a palace, twice the size of the old one, and other important

buildings. During this period, many citizens, especially those who had

been burnt out, and numbers of the court, settled in the new city, and

the place became populous. On completing the palace (February, 1824), the

king returned to Umerapoora, and, after brilliant parting festivities,

came from thence with great pomp and ceremony, attended by the various

governors, Chobwant, and highest officers. The procession, in which the

white elephant, decorated with gold and gems, was conspicuous, displayed

the glories of the kingdom, and great rejoicings pervaded all ranks.”

It was at this time that the portentous omens that had menaced the Burman

monarchy found a corroboration in truth; the glow of enmity, never to be

extinguished even in the hearts of civilised men, fanned by the breath of

presumption, had burnt into a flame that scorched and scared the weaker

party. We must stay awhile to consider the causes, and which led to the

appeal to arms in 1824.

It may be imagined that an outbreak of some kind was far from being

unexpected on the part of the Anglo-Indian government. There were two

interests striving against each other and the world—or rather the

Indian world—within the territories of Burmah. The first of these,

creating more apparent commotion and less real damage, was the struggle

between the dog-like royal family for the bone-like tiara; the second,

more dangerous and more concealed, was the envious and avaricious

passions of the nobles, or more properly, the officials employed by the

Burmese government to defeat its wishes and objects; a task which the

officials of every administration seldom fail to perform to the complete

dissatisfaction of all parties. This has been the true cause of many

disturbances in Burmah; and I am compelled to dissent in some degree

from that feeling which causes Professor Wilson to say, that, “animated

by the reaction, which suddenly elevated the Burmans from a subjugated

and humiliated people, into conquerors and sovereigns, the era of their

ambition may be dated from the recovery of their political independence;

and their liberation from the temporary yoke of the Peguers was the

prelude to their conquest of all the surrounding realms.”[265] This might

be very true of the immediate successors of the great Alompra; but the

power of the dignitaries had, by the time or which we now speak, risen to

a very great pitch, which insensibly overawed and restrained the holder

of the diadem, whoever he might be; and though, indeed, the “vigorous

despotism” of Men-ta-ra-gyee might temporarily set at defiance this

incomprehensible power, yet under the government of Nun-sun, the distant

viceroys first, and gradually the less remote officers, resumed their

former powerful position. And though they acted in subordination to the

crown, and showed a species of heroism in defending its interests, yet

they had raised the storm; and it was for them, they knew, to battle with

it, and uphold that single bond, the destruction of which would have been

totally ruinous to them.

The organized forays into our territory of Chittagong hardly assumed

any definite form until the end of 1823. “The Burmans,” says Professor

Wilson, “claimed the right of levying a toll upon all boats entering the

mouth of the river, although upon the British side; and on one occasion,

in January, 1823, a boat laden with rice, having entered the river on the

west or British side of the channel, was challenged by an armed Burman

boat, which demanded duty. As the demand was unprecedented, the Mugs, who

were British subjects, demurred payment; on which the Burmans fired upon

them, killed the manjhee, or steersman, and then retired. This outrage

was followed by reports of the assemblage of armed men on the Burman side

of the river, for the purpose of destroying the villages on the British

territory; and in order to provide against such a contingency, as well as

to prevent the repetition of any aggression upon the boats trafficking

on the Company’s side of the river, the military guard at Tek-naf, or

the mouth of the Naf, was strengthened from twenty to fifty men, of whom

a few were posted on the adjoining island of Shapurí; a small islet

or sandbank at the mouth of the river on the British side, and only

separated from the mainland by a narrow channel, which was fordable at

low water.”[266]

This act attracted the attention of the Arakhan viceroy, who thereupon

demanded its unconditional surrender, claiming it as the property of

the Burmese government. This was certainly untrue; and the existence of

many documents and facts, favourable to the British claims, caused the

resident to propose a friendly discussion of the matter. The fruitless

negotiation met an almost decisive blow on the 24th of September, when

one thousand Burmans landed and overpowered the British force, “killing

three and wounding four of the sipahees stationed there.”

“In order, however,” observes Wilson, “to avoid till the last possible

moment the necessity of hostilities, the government of Bengal, although

determined to assert their just pretensions, resolved to afford to

the court of Ava an opportunity of avoiding any collision. With this

intent, they resolved to consider the forcible occupation of Shapurí

as the act of the local authorities alone [as, in the first case, it

probably was], and addressed a declaration to the Burman government,

recapitulating the past occurrences, and calling upon the court of Ava

to disavow its officers in Arakan. The declaration was forwarded by ship

to Rangoon, with a letter addressed to the viceroy of Pegu. The tone

of this despatch was that of firmness, though of moderation; but when

rendered into the Burmese language, it may, probably, have failed to

convey the resolved and conciliatory spirit by which it was dictated,

as subsequent information, of the most authentic character, established

the fact of its having been misunderstood as a pusillanimous attempt

to deprecate the resentment of the Burmese; and it was triumphantly

appealed to at the court of Ava as a proof that the British government of

India was reluctant to enter upon the contest, because it was conscious

of possessing neither courage nor resources to engage in it with any

prospect of success; it had no other effect, therefore, than that of

confirming the court of Ava in their confident expectation of reannexing

the eastern provinces of Bengal to the empire, if not of expelling the

English from India altogether.”[267] However, the British reoccupied

Shapurí, and stockaded themselves in that post, while, in retaliation,

the Burmese seized upon the master and officers of the Company’s vessel

_Sophia_, and sent them up the country.

To continue the story in the words of Macfarlane, who has here ably

epitomized the history of Wilson:—“More and more confirmed in their

idea that we were afraid, from four thousand to five thousand Burmese

and Asamese advanced from Asam into the province of Cachar, and began

to stockade themselves at a post within five miles of the town of

Sylhet, and only two hundred and twenty-six miles from Calcutta. Major

Newton, the officer commanding on the Sylhet frontier, concentrated his

detachment and marched against the invaders. It was at daybreak on the

17th of January, 1824, that he came in sight of their stockade and of

a village adjoining, of which they had taken possession. The Burmese

in the village presently gave way, but those in the stockades made a

resolute resistance, and were not driven out until they had lost about

one hundred men, and had killed six of our sepoys. They then fled to the

hills. Shortly after this action, Mr. Scott, our commissioner, arrived

at Sylhet, and from that point he advanced to Bhadrapoor, in order to

maintain a more ready communication with the Burmese authorities. On the

31st of January, Mr. Scott received a message from the Burmese general,

who justified his advance into Cachar, and declared that he had orders to

follow and apprehend certain persons wherever they might take refuge. In

reply, this Burmese general, who held the chief command in Asam, was told

that he must not disturb the frontiers of the Company, nor interfere in

the affairs of its allies; and that the Burmese invaders must evacuate

Cachar, or the forces of the British government would be compelled to

advance both into Cachar and Asam. To this communication no answer was

received.

“It was clearly the object of the Burmese to procrastinate the

negotiations until they had strengthened themselves in the advanced

positions they had occupied. The rajah of Synteea, who had been

imperiously summoned to the Burmese camp, and commanded to prostrate

himself before the shadow of the Golden Foot, threw himself upon the

British government for protection; and various native chiefs, whose

territories lay between the frontiers of the Burmese empire and the

frontiers of the British dominions, called loudly for English aid. Thus,

the south-east frontier of Bengal had in fact been kept in constant dread

and danger of invasion for more than a year, while the adjoining and

friendly territories had been exposed to the destructive inroads and the

overbearing insolence of the Burmese and Asamese, for many years.

“Major Newton did not follow the Burmese he had routed, but, after

driving them from their stockade, he returned to Sylhet, and withdrew

the whole of his force from Cachar. Almost as soon as the major was

within his own frontier, the Burmese advanced again into the country from

which he had driven them, and stockaded some stronger positions. They

were joined by another considerable force, while another detachment,

2,000 strong, collected in their rear, as a reserve, or column of

support. Still advancing, and stockading as they advanced, the main

body of the Burmese pushed their stockades on the north bank of the

river Surma, to within 1,000 yards of the British post at Bhadrapoor.

Captain Johnstone, who commanded at that post, had but a very small

force with him, yet he succeeded in dislodging the invaders from their

unfinished works at the point of the bayonet, and in driving them

beyond the Surma. This was on the 13th of February. On the following

day, Lieutenant-Colonel Bowen joined, and took the command over Captain

Johnstone, and instantly marched in pursuit of the retreating enemy. They

were found stockading themselves in a strong position on the opposite

bank of the Jelingha. As soon as our troops were over, and had fixed

their bayonets, the Burmese cleared out of their stockade, and fled to

the hills. But there was another division of the army of the Lord of

the White Elephant, which had stockaded a much stronger position at

Doodpatlee, where their front was covered by the Surma river, and their

rear rested on steep hills. The exposed face of this intrenchment was

defended by a deep ditch, about fourteen feet wide; a strong fence of

bamboo spikes ran along the outer edge of the ditch, and the approach

on the land side was through jungle and high grass. Lieutenant-Colonel

Bowen, however, marched against this formidable stockade, and attacked

it. The Burmese remained passive till our troops advanced to the bamboo

spikes, when they poured upon them a destructive and well-maintained

fire, which completely checked their advance, although they kept their

ground. When Lieutenant Armstrong had been killed, and four other

officers wounded, and about 150 of our sepoys killed or wounded, Bowen

called off the attacking party, and retired to Jatrapoor, at a short

distance. On the 27th of February, Colonel Innes joined the force at

Jatrapoor, with four guns and a battalion of fresh troops, and assumed

the command. But, in the mean while, the Burmese had retreated from

their formidable position, and retired into their own country, evacuating

the whole of Cachar.”[268]

Such was the origin and early progress of a war fated to be most

disastrous to all parties concerned in it. We must not introduce so great

a man as the Maha Bundoola at the close of a chapter; so we end it here.

Burmah and the Burmese · 第 3 / 8 章