Lastly and chiefly the answer of Ruth implies a religious

change--conversion. She renounces Chemosh and turns in faith and hope to

the God of Israel, and this is the striking feature of her choice. Dimly

seen, the grace and righteousness of the Most High touched her soul,

commanded her reverence, drew her to follow one who was His servant and

could recount the wonderful story of His people. Surely it is a supreme

event in any life when this vision of the Best allures the mind and

engages the will, even though knowledge of God be as yet very imperfect.

And the reliance of Ruth upon the little she felt and knew of God, her

clear resolution to seek rest under His wings appear in striking

contrast with the reluctance, the unconcern, the hard unfaith of many

to-day. How is it that they to whom the Word speaks and the life is

revealed, whose portion is at every moment enriched by that Word and

that life are so blind to the grace that encompasses and deaf to the

love that entreats? Again and again we see them on the banks of some

Jordan, with the land of God clear in view, with the promise of devotion

trembling on their lips; but they turn back to Moab and Chemosh, to

paganism, unrest and despair.

Ruth's life properly began when at Naomi's side she passed through the

waters, the very waters of baptism to her. There, with the purple

mountains of Moab and the precipices of the Dead Sea shore behind, she

sent her last look to Orpah and the past, and saw before her the steep

narrow ascent through the Judaean hills. With rising faith, with growing

love she moved to the fulfilment of womanhood in realizing the soul's

highest power and privilege. The upward path was hard to weary feet and

all was not to be easy for Ruth in the Bethlehem of which she had

dreamed; but fully committed and pledged to the new life she went

forward. How much is missed when the choice to serve God is not

unreservedly made, and there is not that full consecration of which

Ruth's decision may be a type.

Of this loss we see examples on every side. To remain in the low ground

by the river, still within reach of some paganism that fascinates even

after profession and baptism--this is the end of religious feeling with

many. Where the narrow way of discipleship leads they will not

adventure; it is too bare, confining and severe. They will not believe

that freedom for the human soul is found by that path alone; they

refuse to be bound and therefore never discover the inheritance of

God's children to which they are called. When He who alone can guide,

quicken, redeem is accepted solemnly and finally as the Lord of life,

then at last the weak and entangled spirit knows the beginning of

liberty and strength. Sad is the reckoning in our time of those who

refuse to pledge themselves to the Saviour Whose claim they do feel to

be divine and urgent. Not yet may the preacher cease to speak of

conversion as the necessity in every life. Rather because it is easy to

be in touch with Christianity at some point, because gospel influences

are widely diffused, and church connection can be lightly held, the

personal pledge to Christ must be insisted upon in the pulpit and kept

in view as the end to which all the work of the church is directed.

* * * * *

Life has many partings, and we have all had our experience of some which

without fault on either side separate those well fitted to serve and

bless each other. Over matters of faith, questions of political order

and even social morality separations will occur. There may be no lack of

faithfulness on either side when at a certain point widely divergent

views of duty are taken by two who have been friends. One standing only

a little apart from the other sees the same light reflected from a

different facet of the crystal, streaming out in a different direction.

As it would be altogether a mistake to say that Orpah took the way of

worldly selfishness, Ruth only going in the way of duty, so it is

entirely a mistake to accuse those who part with us on some question of

faith or conduct and think of them as finally estranged. A little more

knowledge and we would see with them or they with us. Some day they and

we shall reach the truth and agree in our conclusions. Separations there

must be for a time, for as the character leans to love or justice, the

mind to reasoning or emotion, there is a difference in the vision of the

good for which a man should strive. And if it comes to this that the

paths chosen by those who were once dear friends divide them to the end

of earthly days, they should retain the recollection not so much of the

single point that separated, as of the many on which there was

agreement. Even though they have to fight on opposite sides it should be

as those who were brothers once and shall be brothers again. Indeed, are

they not brothers still, if they fight for the same Master?

Yet one difference between men reaches to the roots of life. The company

of those who keep the straight way and press on towards the light have

the most sorrowful recollection of some partings. They have had to leave

comrades and brethren behind who despised the quest of holiness and

immortality and had nothing but mockery for the Friend and Saviour of

man. The shadows of estrangement falling between those who are of

Christ's company are nothing compared with the dense cloud which divides

them from men pledged to what is earthly and ignoble; and so the

reproach of sectarian division coming from irreligious persons needs not

trouble those who have as Christians an eternal brotherhood.

There are divisions sharp and dreadful, not always at some river which

clearly separates land from land. They may be made in the street where

parting seems temporary and casual. They may be made in the very house

of God. While some members of a family are responding with joy to a

divine appeal, one may be resolutely turning from it to a base

idolatry. Of three who went together to a place of prayer two may from

that hour keep company in the heavenward journey, while the third moves

every day towards the shadow of self-chosen reprobation. Christ has

spoken of tremendous separations which men make by their acceptance or

rejection of Him. "These shall go away into eternal punishment, but the

righteous into life eternal."

III.

_IN THE FIELD OF BOAZ._

RUTH i. 19-ii. 23.

Weary and footsore the two travellers reached Bethlehem at length, and

"all the city was moved about them." Though ten years had elapsed, many

yet remembered as if it had been yesterday the season of terrible famine

and the departure of the emigrants. Now the women lingering at the well,

when they see the strangers approaching, say as they look in the face of

the elder one, "Is this Naomi?" What a change is here! With husband and

sons, hoping for a new life across in Moab, she went away. Her return

has about it no sign of success; she comes on foot, in the company of

one who is evidently of an alien race, and the two have all the marks of

poverty. The women who recognize the widow of Elimelech are somewhat

pitiful, perhaps also a little scornful. They had not left their native

land nor doubted the promise of Jehovah. Through the famine they had

waited, and now their position contrasts very favourably with hers.

Surely Naomi is far down in the world since she has made a companion of

a woman of Moab. Her poverty is against the wayfarer, and to those who

know not the story of her life that which shows her goodness and

faithfulness appears a cause of reproach and reason of suspicion.

Is it too harsh to interpret thus the question with which Naomi is met?

We are only using a key which common experience of life supplies. Do

people give sincere and hearty sympathy to those who went away full and

return empty, who were once in good standing and repute and come back

years after to their old haunts impoverished and with strange

associates? Are we not more ready to judge unfavourably in such a case

than to exercise charity? The trick of hasty interpretation is common

because every one desires to be on good terms with himself, and nothing

is so soothing to vanity as the discovery of mistakes into which others

have fallen. "All the brethren of the poor do hate him," says one who

knew the Hebrews and human nature well; "how much more do his friends go

far from him. He pursueth them with words, yet they are wanting to him."

Naomi finds it so when she throws herself on the compassion of her old

neighbours. They are not uninterested, they are not altogether unkind,

but they feel their superiority.

And Naomi appears to accept the judgment they have formed. Very touching

is the lament in which she takes her position as one whom God has

rebuked, whom it is no wonder, therefore, that old friends despise. She

almost makes excuse for those who look down upon her from the high

ground of their imaginary virtue and wisdom. Indeed she has the same

belief as they that poverty, the loss of land, bereavement and every

kind of affliction are marks of God's displeasure. For, what does she

say? "Call me not Naomi, Pleasant, call me Mara, Bitter, for the

Almighty hath dealt very bitterly with me.... The Lord hath testified

against me and the Almighty hath afflicted me." Such was the Hebrew

thought, the purpose of God in His dealings with men not being

apprehended. Under the shadow of loss and sorrow it seemed that no heat

of the Divine Presence could be felt. To have a husband and children

appeared to Naomi evidence of God's favour; to lose them was a proof

that He had turned against her. Heavy as her losses had been the

terrible thing was that they implied the displeasure of God.

It is perhaps difficult for us to realize even by an imaginative effort

this condition of soul--the sense of banishment, darkness, outlawry

which came to the Hebrew whenever he fell into distress or penury. And

yet we ourselves retain the same standard of judgment in our common

estimate of life; we still interpret things by an ignorant unbelief

which causes many worthy souls to bow in a humiliation Christians should

never feel. Do not the loneliness, the poverty, the testimony of Christ

teach us something altogether different? Can we still cherish the notion

that prosperity is an evidence of worth and that the man who can found a

family must be a favourite of the heavenly powers? Judge thus and the

providence of God is a tangle, a perplexing darkening problem which,

believe as you may, must still overwhelm. Wealth has its conditions;

money comes through some one's cleverness in work and trading, some

one's inventiveness or thrift, and these qualities are reputable. But

nothing is proved regarding the spiritual tone and nature of a life

either by wealth or by the want of it. And surely we have learned that

loss of friends and loneliness are not to be reckoned the punishment of

sin. Often enough we hear the warning that wealth and worldly position

are not to be sought for themselves, and yet, side by side with this

warning, the implication that a high place and a prosperous life are

proofs of divine blessing.

On the whole subject Christian thought is far from clear, and we have

need to go anew to the Master and inquire of Him Who had no place where

to lay His head. The Hebrew belief in the prosperity of God's servants

must fulfil itself in a larger better faith or the man of to-morrow will

have no faith at all. One who bewails the loss of wealth or friends is

doing nothing that has spiritual meaning or value. When he takes himself

to task for that despondency he begins to touch the spiritual.

In Bethlehem Naomi found the half-ruined cottage still belonging to her,

and there she and Ruth took up their abode. But for a living what was to

be done? The answer came in the proposal of Ruth to go into the fields

where the barley harvest was proceeding and glean after the reapers. By

great diligence she might gather enough day by day for the bare

sustenance that contents a Syrian peasant, and afterwards some other

means of providing for herself and Naomi might be found. The work was

not dignified. She would have to appear among the waifs and wanderers of

the country, with women whose behaviour exposed them to the rude gibes

of the labourers. But whatever plan Naomi vaguely entertained was

hanging in abeyance, and the circumstances of the women were urgent. No

kinsman came forward to help them. Loath as she was to expose Ruth to

the trials of the harvest-field, Naomi had to let her go. So it was Ruth

who made the first move, Ruth the stranger who brought succour to the

Hebrew widow when her own people held aloof and she herself knew not how

to act.

Now among the farmers whose barley was falling before the sickle was the

land-owner Boaz, a kinsman of Elimelech, a man of substance and social

importance, one of those who in the midst of their fruitful fields

shine with bountiful good-humour and by their presence make their

servants work heartily. To Ruth in after days it must have seemed a

wonderful thing that her first timid expedition led her to a portion of

ground belonging to this man. From the moment he appears in the

narrative we note in him a certain largeness of character. It may be

only the easy kindness of the prosperous man, but it commends him to our

good opinion. Those who have a smooth way through the world are bound to

be especially kind and considerate in their bearing toward neighbours

and dependants, this at least they owe as an acknowledgment to the rest

of the world, and we are always pleased to find a rich man paying his

debt so far. There is a certain piety also in the greeting of Boaz to

his labourers, a customary thing no doubt and good even in that sense,

but better when it carries, as it seems to do here, a personal and

friendly message. Here is a man who will observe with strict eye

everything that goes on in the field and will be quick to challenge any

lazy reaper. But he is not remote from those who serve him, he and they

meet on common ground of humanity and faith.

The great operations which some in these days think fit to carry on,

more for their own glory certainly than the good of their country or

countrymen, entirely preclude anything like friendship between the chief

and the multitude of his subordinates. It is impossible that a man who

has a thousand under him should know and consider each, and there would

be too much pretence in saying, "God be with you," on entering a yard or

factory when otherwise no feeling is shown with which the name of God

can be connected. Apart altogether from questions as to wealth and its

use every employer has a responsibility for maintaining the healthy

human activity of his people, and nowhere is the immorality of the

present system of huge concerns so evident as in the extinction of

personal good will. The workman of course may adjust himself to the

state of matters, but it will too often be by discrediting what he knows

he cannot have and keeping up a critical resentful habit of mind against

those who seem to treat him as a machine. He may often be wrong in his

judgment of an employer. There may be less hardness of temper on the

other side than there is on his own. But, the conditions being what they

are, one may say he is certain to be a severe critic. We have

unquestionably lost much and are in danger of losing more, not in a

financial sense, which matters little, but in the infinitely more

important affairs of social sweetness and Christian civilization.

Boaz the farmer had not more in hand than he could attend to honestly,

and everything under his care was well ordered. He had a foreman over

the reapers, and from him he required an account of the stranger whom he

saw gleaning in the field. There were to be no hangers-on of loose

character where he exercised authority; and in this we justify him. We

like to see a man keeping a firm hand when we are sure that he has a

good heart and knows what he is doing. Such a one is bound within the

range of his power to have all done rightly and honourably, and Boaz

pleases us all the better that he makes close inquiry regarding the

woman who seeks the poor gains of a common gleaner.

Of course in a place like Bethlehem people knew each other, and Boaz was

probably acquainted with most whom he saw about; at once, therefore, the

new figure of the Moabite woman attracted his attention. Who is she? A

kindly heart prompts the inquiry for the farmer knows that if he

interests himself in this young woman he may be burdened with a new

dependant. "It is the Moabitish damsel that came back with Naomi out of

the country of Moab." She is the daughter-in-law of his old friend

Elimelech. Before the eyes of Boaz one of the romances of life, common

and tragic too, is unfolding itself. Often had Boaz and Elimelech held

counsel with each other, met at each other's houses, talked together of

their fields or of the state of the country. But Elimelech went away and

lost all and died; and two widows, the wreck of the family, had returned

to Bethlehem. It was plain that these would be new claimants on his

favour, but unlike many well-to-do persons Boaz does not wait for some

urgent appeal; he acts rather as one who is glad to do a kindness for

old friendship's sake.

Great was the surprise of the lonely gleaner when the rich man came to

her side and gave her a word of comfortable greeting. "Hearest thou not,

my daughter? Go not to glean in another field, but abide here fast by my

maidens." Nothing had been done to make Ruth feel at home in Bethlehem

until Boaz addressed her. She had perhaps seen proud and scornful looks

in the street and at the well, and had to bear them meekly, silently. In

the fields she may have looked for something of the kind and even feared

that Boaz would dismiss her. A gentle person in such circumstances is

exceedingly grateful for a very small kindness, and it was not a slight

favour that Boaz did her. But in making her acknowledgments Ruth did not

know what had prepared her way. The truth was that she had met with a

man of character who valued character, and her faithfulness commended

her. "It hath been fully showed me, all that thou hast done unto thy

mother-in-law since the death of thine husband." The best point in Boaz

is that he so quickly and fully recognises the goodness of another and

will help her because they stand upon a common ground of conscience and

duty.

Is it on such a ground you draw to others? Is your interest won by

kindly dispositions and fidelity of temper? Do you love those who are

sincere and patient in their duties, content to serve where service is

appointed by God? Are you attracted by one who cherishes a parent, say a

poor mother, in the time of feebleness and old age, doing all that is

possible to smooth her path and provide for her comfort? Or have you

little esteem for such a one, for the duties so faithfully discharged,

because you see no brilliance or beauty, and there are other persons

more clever and successful on their own account, more amusing because

they are unburdened? If so, be sure of your own ignorance, your own

undutifulness, your own want of principle and heart. Character is known

by character, and worth by worth. Those who are acquainted with you

could probably say that you care more for display than for honour, that

you think more of making a fine figure in society than of showing

generosity, forbearance integrity at home. The good appreciate goodness,

the true honour truth. One important lesson of the Book of Ruth lies

here, that the great thing for young women, and for young men also, is

to be quietly faithful in the service, however humble, to which God has

called them and the family circle in which He has set them. Not indeed

because that is the line of promotion, though Ruth found it so; every

Ruth does not obtain favour in the eyes of a wealthy Boaz. So honourable

and good a man is not to be met on every harvest held; on the contrary

she may encounter a Nabal, one who is churlish and evil in his doings.

We must take the course of this narrative as symbolic. The book has in

it the strain of a religious idyl. The Moabite who wins the regard of

this man of Judah represents those who, though naturally strangers to

the covenant of promise, receive the grace of God and enter the circle

of divine blessing--even coming to high dignity in the generations of

the chosen people. It is idyllic, we say, not an exhibition of every-day

fact; yet the course of divine justice is surely more beautiful, more

certain. To every Ruth comes the Heavenly Friend Whose are all the

pastures and fields, all the good things of life. The Christian hope is

in One Who cannot fail to mark the most private faithfulness, piety and

love hidden like violets among the grass. If there is not such a One,

the Helper and Vindicator of meek fidelity, virtue has no sanction and

well-doing no recompense.

The true Israelite Boaz accepts the daughter of an alien and unfriendly

people on account of her own character and piety. "The Lord recompense

thy work, and a full reward be given thee of the Lord, the God of

Israel, under Whose wings thou art come to take refuge." Such is the

benediction which Boaz invokes on Ruth, receiving her cordially into the

family circle of Jehovah. Already she has ceased to be a stranger and a

foreigner to him. The boundary walls of race are overstepped, partly, no

doubt, by that sense of kinship which the Bethlehemite is quick to

acknowledge. For Naomi's sake and for Elimelech's as well as her own he

craves divine protection and reward for the daughter of Moab. Yet the

beautiful phrase he employs, full of Hebrew confidence in God, is an

acknowledgment of Ruth's act of faith and her personal right to share

with the children of Abraham the fostering love of the Almighty. The

story, then, is a plea against that exclusiveness which the Hebrews too

often indulged. On this page of the annals the truth is written out that

though Jehovah cared for Israel much He cares still more for love and

faithfulness, purity and goodness. We reach at last an instance of that

fulfilment of Israel's mission to the nations around which in our study

of the Book of Judges we looked for in vain.

Not for Israel only in the time of its narrowness was the lesson given.

We need it still. The justification and redemption of God are not

restricted to those who have certain traditions and beliefs. Even as a

Moabite woman brought up in the worship of Chemosh, with many heathen

ideas still in her mind, has her place under the wings of Jehovah as a

soul seeking righteousness, so from countries and regions of life which

Christian people may consider a kind of rude heathen Moab many in

humility and sincerity may be coming nigh to the kingdom of God. It was

so in our Lord's time, and it is so still. All along the true religion

of God has been for reconciliation and brotherhood among men, and it was

possible for many Israelites to do what Naomi did in the way of making

effectual the promise of God to Abraham that in his seed all families of

the earth should be blessed. There never was a middle wall of partition

between men except in the thought of the Hebrew. He was separated that

he might be able to convert and bless, not that he might stand aloof in

pride. The wall which he built Christ has broken down that the servants

of His gospel may go freely forth to find everywhere brethren in common

humanity and need, who are to be made brethren in Christ. The outward

representation of brotherhood in faith must follow the work of the

reconciling Spirit--cannot precede it. And when the reconciliation is

felt in the depth of human souls we shall have the all-comprehensive

church, a fair and gracious dwelling-place, wide as the race, rich with

every noble thought and hope of man and every gift of Heaven.

IV.

_THE HAZARDOUS PLAN._

RUTH iii.

The Expositor's Bible: Judges and Ruth · 第 26 / 28 段