But there are _Shibboleths_ of party, and we must be careful lest in

trying others we use some catchword of our own Gilead by which to judge

their religion or their virtue. The danger of the earnest, alike in

religion, politics and philanthropy, is to make their own favourite

plans or doctrines the test of all worth and belief. Within our churches

and in the ranks of social reformers distinctions are made where there

should be none and old strifes are deepened. There are of course certain

great principles of judgment. Christianity is founded on historical fact

and revealed truth. "Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is

come in the flesh is of God." In such a saying lies a test which is no

tribal _Shibboleth_. And on the same level are others by which we are

constrained at all hazards to try ourselves and those who speak and

write. Certain points of morality are vital and must be pressed. When a

writer says, "In mediaeval times the recognition that every natural

impulse in a healthy and mature being has a claim to gratification was a

victory of unsophisticated nature over the asceticism of

Christianity"--we use no Shibboleth-test in condemning him. He is judged

and found wanting by principles on which the very existence of human

society depends. It is in no spirit of bigotry but in faithfulness to

the essentials of life and the hope of mankind that the sternest

denunciation is hurled at such a man. In plain terms he is an enemy of

the race.

Passing from cases like this, observe others in which a measure of

dogmatism must be allowed to the ardent. Where there are no strong

opinions strenuously held and expressed little impression will be made.

The prophets in every age have spoken dogmatically; and vehemence of

speech is not to be denied to the temperance reformer, the apostle of

purity, the enemy of luxurious self-indulgence and cant. Moral

indignation must express itself strongly; and in the dearth of moral

conviction we can bear with those who would even drag us to the ford and

make us utter their _Shibboleth_. They go too far, people say: perhaps

they do; but there are so many who will not move at all except in the

way of pleasure.

Now all this is clear. But we must return to the danger of making one

aspect of morality the sole test of morals, one religious idea the sole

test of religion and so framing a formula by which men separate

themselves from their friends and pass narrow bitter judgments on their

kinsfolk. Let sincere belief and strong feeling rise to the prophetic

strain; let there be ardour, let there be dogmatism and vehemence. But

beyond urgent words and strenuous example, beyond the effort to persuade

and convert there lie arrogance and the usurpation of a judgment which

belongs to God alone. In proportion as a Christian is living the life of

Christ he will repel the claim of any other man however devout to force

his opinion or his action. All attempts at terrorism betray a lack of

spirituality. The Inquisition was in reality the world oppressing

spiritual life. And so in less degree, with less truculence, the

unspiritual element may show itself even in company with a fervent

desire to serve the gospel. There need be no surprise that attempts to

dictate to Christendom or any part of Christendom are warmly resented by

those who know that religion and liberty cannot be separated. The true

church of Christ has a firm grasp of what it believes and is aiming at,

and by its resoluteness it bears on human society. It is also gracious

and persuasive, reasonable and open, and so gathers men into a free and

frank brotherhood, revealing to them the loftiest duty, leading them

towards it in the way of liberty. Let men who understand this try each

other and it will never be by limited and suspicious formulae.

Amidst pedants, critics, hot and bitter partisans, we see Christ moving

in divine freedom. Fine is the subtlety of His thought in which the

ideas of spiritual liberty and of duty blend to form one luminous

strain. Fine are the clearness and simplicity of that daily life in

which He becomes the way and the truth to men. It is the ideal life,

beyond all mere rules, disclosing the law of the kingdom of heaven; it

is free and powerful because upheld by the purpose that underlies all

activity and development. Are we endeavouring to realize it? Scarcely at

all: the bonds are multiplying not falling away; no man is bold to claim

his right, nor generous to give others their room. In this age of Christ

we seem neither to behold nor desire His manhood. Shall this always be?

Shall there not arise a race fit for liberty because obedient, ardent,

true? Shall we not come in the unity of the faith and of the knowledge

of the Son of God unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature

of the fulness of Christ?

* * * * *

For a little we must return to Jephthah, who after his great victory and

his strange dark act of faith judged Israel but six years. He appears in

striking contrast to other chiefs of his time and even of far later

times in the purity of his home life, the more notable that his father

set no example of good. Perhaps the legacy of dispeace and exile

bequeathed to him with a tainted birth had taught the Gileadite, rude

mountaineer as he was, the value of that order which his people too

often despised. The silence of the history which is elsewhere careful to

speak of wives and children sets Jephthah before us as a kind of

puritan, with another and perhaps greater distinction than the desire to

avoid war. The yearly lament for his daughter kept alive the memory not

only of the heroine but of one judge in Israel who set a high example of

family life. A sad and lonely man he went those few years of his rule in

Gilead, but we may be sure that the character and will of the Holy One

became more clear to him after he had passed the dreadful hill of

sacrifice. The story is of the old world, terrible; yet we have found in

Jephthah a sublime sincerity, and we may believe that such a man though

he never repented of his vow would come to see that the God of Israel

demanded another and a nobler sacrifice, that of life devoted to His

righteousness and truth.

XIX.

_THE ANGEL IN THE FIELD._

JUDGES xiii. 1-18.

In our ignorance not in our knowledge, in our blindness not in our light

we call nature secular and think of the ordinary course of events as a

series of cold operations, governed by law and force, having nothing to

do with divine purpose and love. Oftentimes we think so, and suffer

because we do not understand. It is a pitiful error. The natural could

not exist, there could be neither substance nor order without the

over-nature which is at once law and grace. Vitality, movement are not

an efflorescence heralding decay--as to the atheist; they are not the

activity of an evil spirit--as sometimes to confused and falsely

instructed faith. They are the outward and visible action of God, the

hem of the vesture on which we lay hold and feel Him. In the seen and

temporal there is a constant presence maintaining order, giving purpose

and end. Were it otherwise man could not live an hour; even in

selfishness and vileness he is a creature of two worlds which yet are

one, so closely are they interwoven. At every point natural and

supernatural are blended, the higher shaping the development of the

lower, accomplishing in and through the lower a great spiritual plan.

This it is which gives depth and weight to our experience,

communicating the dignity of the greatest moral and spiritual issues to

the meanest, darkest human life. Everywhere, always, man touches God

though he know Him not.

No surprise, therefore, is excited by the modes of speech and thought we

come upon as we read Scripture. The surprise would be in not coming upon

them. If we found the inspired writers divorcing God from the world and

thinking of "nature" as a dark chamber of sin and torture echoing with

His curse, there would be no profit in studying this old volume. Then

indeed we might turn from it in discontent and scorn, even as some cast

it aside just because it is the revelation of God dwelling with men upon

the earth.

But what do the writers of faith mean when they tell of divine

messengers coming to peasants at labour in the fields, speaking to them

of events common to the race--the birth of some child, the defeat of a

rival tribe--as affairs of the spiritual even more than of the temporal

region? The narratives simple yet daring which affirm the mingling of

divine purpose and action with human life give us the deepest science,

the one real philosophy. Why do we have to care and suffer for each

other? What are our sin and sorrow? These are not material facts; they

are of quite another range. Always man is more than dust, better or

worse than clay. Human lives are linked together in a gracious and awful

order the course of which is now clearly marked, now obscurely

traceable; and if it were in our power to revive the history of past

ages, to mark the operation of faith and unbelief among men, issuing in

virtue and nobleness on the one hand, in vice and lethargy on the other,

we should see how near heaven is to earth, how rational a thing is

prophecy, not only as relating to masses of men but to particular

lives. It is our stupidity not our wisdom that starts back from

revelations of the over-world as if they confused what would otherwise

be clear.

In more than one story of the Bible the motherhood of a simple peasant

woman is a cause of divine communications and supernatural hopes. Is

this amazing, incredible? What then is motherhood itself? In the coming

and care of frail existences, the strange blending in one great

necessity of the glad and the severe, the honourable and the

humiliating, with so many possibilities of failure in duty, of error and

misunderstanding ere the needful task is finished, death ever waiting on

life, and agony on joy--in all this do we not find such a manifestation

of the higher purpose as might well be heralded by words and signs? Only

the order of God and His redemption can explain this "nature." Right in

the path of atheistic reasoners, and of others not atheists, lie facts

of human life which on their theory of naturalism are simply

confounding, too great at once for the causes they admit and the ends

they foresee. And if reason denies the possibility of prediction

relating to these facts we need not wonder. Without philosophy or faith

the range of denial is unlimited.

From the quaint and simple narrative before us the imaginative

rationalist turns away with the one word--"myth." His criticism is of a

sort which for all its ease and freedom gives the world nothing. We

desire to know why the human mind harbours thoughts of the kind, why it

has ideas of God and of a supernatural order, and how these work in

developing the race. Have they been of service? Have they given strength

and largeness to poor rude lives and so proved a great reality? If so,

the word myth is inadmissible. It sets falsehood at the source of

progress and of good.

Here are two Hebrew peasants, in a period of Philistine domination more

than a thousand years before the Christian era. Of their condition we

know only what a few brief sentences can tell in a history concerned

chiefly with the facts of a divine order in which men's lives have an

appointed place and use. It is certain that a thorough knowledge of this

Danite family, its own history and its part in the history of Israel,

would leave no difficulty for faith. Belief in the fore-ordination of

all human existence and the constant presence of God with men and women

in their endurance, their hope and yearning would be forced upon the

most sceptical mind. The insignificance of the occasion marked by a

prediction given in the name of God may astonish some. But what is

insignificant? Wherever divine predestination and authority extend, and

that is throughout the whole universe, nothing can properly be called

insignificant. The laws according to which material things and forces

are controlled by God touch the minutest particles of matter, determine

the shape of a dew-drop as certainly as the form of a world. At every

point in human life, the birth of a child in the poorest cottage as well

as of the heir to an empire, the same principles of heredity, the same

disposition of affairs to leave room for that life and to work out its

destiny underlie the economy of the world.

A life is to appear. It is not an interposition or interpolation. No

event, no life is ever thrust into an age without relation to the past;

no purpose is formed in the hour of a certain prophecy. For Samson as

for every actor distinguished or obscure upon the stage of the world

the stars and the seasons have co-operated and all that has been done

under the sun has gone to make a place for him. One who knows this can

speak strongly and clearly. One who knows what hinders and what is sure

to aid the fulfilment of a great destiny can counsel wisely. And so the

angel of Jehovah, a messenger of the spiritual covenant, is no mere

vehicle of a prediction he does not understand. Without hesitation he

speaks to the woman in the field of what her son shall do. By the story

of God's dealings with Israel, by the experiences of tribe and family

and individual soul since the primitive age, by the simple faith of

these parents that are to be and the honest energy of their humble lives

he is prepared to announce to them their honour and their duty. "Thou

shalt bear a son and he shall begin to deliver Israel." The messenger

has had his preparation of thought, inquiry deep devout and pondering,

ere he became fit to announce the word of God. No seer serves the age to

which he is sent with that which costs him nothing, and here as

elsewhere the law of all ministry to God and man must apply to the

preparation and work of the revealer.

The personality of the messenger was carefully concealed. "A man of God

whose countenance was like that of an angel of God very terrible"--so

runs the pathetic, suggestive description; but the hour was too intense

for mere curiosity. The honest mind does not ask the name and social

standing of a messenger but only--Does he speak God's truth? Does he

open life? There are few perhaps, to-day, who are simple and intelligent

enough for this; few, therefore, to whom divine messages come. It is the

credentials we are anxious about, and the prophet waits unheard while

people are demanding his family and tribe, his college and reputation.

Are these satisfactory? Then they will listen. But let no prophet come

to them unnamed. Yet of all importance to us as to Manoah and his wife

are the message, the revelation, the announcement of privilege and duty.

Where that divine order is disclosed which lies too deep for our own

discovery but once revealed stirs and kindles our nature, the prophet

needs no certification.

The child that was to be born, a gift of God, a divine charge, was

promised to these parents. And in the case of every child born into the

world there is a divine predestination which whether it has been

recognized by the parents or not gives dignity to his existence from the

first. There are natural laws and spiritual laws, the gathering together

of energies and needs and duties which make the life unique, the care of

it sacred. It is a new force in the world--a new vessel, frail as yet,

launched on the sea of time. In it some stores of the divine goodness,

some treasures of heavenly force are embarked. As it holds its way

across the ocean in sunshine or shadow, this life will be watched by the

divine eye, breathed gently upon by the summer airs or buffeted by the

storms of God. Does heaven mind the children? "In heaven their angels do

always behold the face of My Father."

In the marvellous ordering of divine providence nothing is more

calculated than fatherhood and motherhood to lift human life into the

high ranges of experience and feeling. Apart from any special message or

revelation, assuming only an ordinary measure of thoughtfulness and

interest in the unfolding of life, there is here a new dignity the sense

of which connects the task of those who have it with the creative energy

of God. Everywhere throughout the world we can trace a more or less

clear understanding of this. The tide of life is felt to rise as the new

office, the new responsibility are grasped. The mother is become--

"A link among the days to knit

The generations each to each."

The father has a sacred trust, a new and nobler duty to which his

manhood is entirely pledged in the sight of that great God who is the

Father of all spirits, doubly and trebly pledged to truth and purity and

courage. It is the coronation of life; and the child, drawing father and

mother to itself, is rightly the object of keenest interest and most

assiduous care.

The interest lies greatly in this, that to the father and mother first,

then to the world there may be untold possibilities of good in the

existence which has begun. Apart from any prophecy like that given

regarding Samson we have truly what may be called a special promise from

God in the dawning energy of every child-life. By the cradle surely, if

anywhere, hope sacred and heavenly may be indulged. With what earnest

glances will the young eyes look by-and-by from face to face. With what

new and keen love will the child-heart beat. Enlarging its grasp from

year to year the mind will lay hold on duty and the will address itself

to the tasks of existence. This child will be a heroine of home, a

helper of society, a soldier of the truth, a servant of God. Does the

mother dream long dreams as she bends over the cradle? Does the father,

one indeed amongst millions, yet with his special distinction and

calling, imagine for the child a future better than his own? It is well.

By the highest laws and instincts of our humanity it is right and good.

Here men and women, the rudest and least taught, live in the immaterial

world of love, faith, duty.

We observe the anxiety of Manoah and his wife to learn the special

method of training which should fit their child for his task. The

father's prayer so soon as he heard of the divine annunciation was, "O

Lord, let the man of God whom Thou didst send come again unto us and

teach us what we shall do unto the child that shall be born." Conscious

of ignorance and inexperience, feeling the weight of responsibility, the

parents desired to have authoritative direction in their duty, and their

anxiety was the deeper because their child was to be a deliverer in

Israel. In their home on the hillside, where the cottages of Zorah

clustered overlooking the Philistine plain, they were frequently

disturbed by the raiders who swept up the valley of Sorek from Ashdod

and Ekron. They had often wondered when God would raise up a deliverer

as of old, some Deborah or Gideon to end the galling oppression. Now the

answer to many a prayer and hope was coming, and in their own home the

hero was to be cradled. We cannot doubt that this made them feel the

pressure of duty and the need of wisdom. Yet the prayer of Manoah was

one which every father has need to present, though the circumstances of

a child's birth have nothing out of the most ordinary course.

To each human mind are given powers which require special fostering,

peculiarities of temperament and feeling which ought to be specially

considered. One way will not serve in the upbringing of two children.

Even the most approved method of the time, whether that of private

tutelage or public instruction, may thwart individuality; and if the way

be ignorant and rough the original faculty will at its very springing be

distorted. It is but the barest commonplace, yet with what frequency it

needs to be urged that of all tasks in the world that of the guide and

instructor of youth is hardest to do well, best worth doing, therefore

most difficult. There is no need to deny that for the earliest years of

a child's life the instincts of a loving faithful mother may be trusted

to guide her efforts. Yet even in those first years tendencies declare

themselves that require to be wisely checked or on the other hand wisely

encouraged; and the wisdom does not come by instinct. A spiritual view

of life, its limitations and possibilities, its high calling and

heavenly destiny is absolutely necessary--that vision of the highest

things which religion alone can give. The prophet comes and directs; yet

the parents must be prophets too. "The child is not to be educated for

the present--for this is done without our aid unceasingly and

powerfully--but for the remote future and often in opposition to the

immediate future.... The child must be armed against the close-pressing

present with a counter-balancing weight of three powers against the

three weaknesses of the will, of love and of religion.... The girl and

the boy must learn that there is something in the ocean higher than its

waves--namely, a Christ who calls upon them."[7] On the religious

teaching especially which is given to children much depends, and those

who guide them should often begin by searching and reconsidering their

own beliefs. Many a promising life is marred because youth in its wonder

and sincerity was taught no living faith in God, or was thrust into the

mould of some narrow creed which had more in it of human bigotry than of

divine reason and love.

[7] Richter, _Levana_.

"What shall be the ordering of the child?" is Manoah's prayer, and it is

well if simply expressed. The child's way needs ordering. Circumstances

must be understood that discipline may fit the young life for its part.

In our own time this represents a serious difficulty. What to do with

children, how to order their lives is the pressing question in thousands

of homes. The scheme of education in favour shows little insight, little

esteem for the individuality of children, which is of as much value in

the case of the backward as of those who are lured and goaded into

distinction. To broaden life, to give it many points of interest is

well. Yet on the other hand how much depends on discipline, on

limitation and concentration, the need of which we are apt to forget.

Narrow and limited was the life of Israel when Samson was born into it.

The boy had to be what the nation was, what Zorah was, what Manoah and

his wife were. The limitations of the time held him and the secluded

life of Dan knowing but one article of patriotic faith, hatred of the

Philistines. Was there so much of restriction here as to make greatness

impossible? Not so. To be an Israelite was to have a certain moral

advantage and superiority. It was not a barren solidarity, a dry ground

in which this new life was planted; the sprout grew out of a living

tree; traditions, laws full of spiritual power made an environment for

the Hebrew child. Through the limitations, fenced and guided by them, a

soul might break forth to the upper air. It was not the narrowness of

Israel nor of his own home and upbringing but the licence of Philistia

that weakened the strong arm and darkened the eager soul of the young

Danite. Are we now to be afraid of limitations, bent on giving to youth

multiform experience and the freest possible access to the world? Do we

dream that strength will come as the stream of life is allowed to wander

over a whole valley, turning hither and thither in a shallow and shifty

bed? The natural parallel here will instruct us, for it is an image of

the spiritual fact. Strength not breadth is the mark at which education

should be directed. The intellectually and morally strong will find

culture waiting them at every turn of the way and will know how to

select, what to appropriate. In truth there must be first the moral

power gained by concentration, otherwise all culture--art, science,

literature, travel--proves but a Barmecide feast at which the soul

starves.

The special method of training for the child Samson is described in the

words, "He shall be a Nazirite unto God." The mother was to drink no

strong drink nor eat any unclean thing. Her son was to be trained in the

same rigid abstinence; and always the sense of obligation to Jehovah was

to accompany the austerity. The hair neither cut nor shaven but allowed

to grow in natural luxuriance was to be the sign of the separated life.

For the hero that was to be, this ascetic purity, this sacrament of

unshorn hair were the only things prescribed. Perhaps there was in the

command a reference to the godless life of the Israelites, a protest

against their self-indulgence and half-heathen freedom. One in the tribe

of Dan would be clear of the sins of drunkenness and gluttony at least,

and so far ready for spiritual work.

The Expositor's Bible: Judges and Ruth · 第 18 / 28 段