359. The following facts seemed to emerge:

(1) The two flight bags were lodged in the Police store at McMurdo

and would have been returned in due course to Mrs Collins and Mrs

Cassin by the Police. But they were taken away from the store by

someone and have not since been seen.

...

These paragraphs followed a discussion by the Commissioner of a

submission by counsel for the Pilots Association that a number of

documents which would have tended to support the proposition that

Captain Collins had relied upon the incorrect co-ordinates had not been

located; and in that context the Commissioner recorded Captain Gemmell's

denial that he had recovered any documents relevant to the flight which

had not been handed over to the chief inspector. There was also a

reference shortly afterwards in the report to Captain Gemmell having

brought back some quantity of documents with him from Antarctica. On its

own this would be innocuous, but it is part of a context which could

lead to inferences adverse to Captain Gemmell being drawn from the

paragraphs complained of.

The applicants say that there was a mistake of fact, no evidence of

probative value and no fair opportunity to answer the criticisms or

findings which they claim to be implicit in these paragraphs. The last

point, the natural justice one, has a special feature in the case of

Captain Gemmell. The applicants say that the findings, apart from one

made under mistake (paragraph 352), were based on information or

evidence gathered by the Commissioner after the public hearings; and

that, while an opportunity of meeting the new matter was given to the

Chief Inspector of Air Accidents, none was given to Air New Zealand or

Captain Gemmell.

Another special feature is that the Commissioner himself ultimately

concluded (paragraph 360) 'However, there is not sufficient evidence to

justify any finding on my part that Captain Gemmell recovered documents

from Antarctica which were relevant to the fatal flight, and which he

did not account for to the proper authorities'.

Judgments of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand on Proceedings to Review Aspects of the Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Mount Erebus Aircraft Disaster C.A. 95/81 · 第 8 / 41 题